EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Popular content
Today's Top News
International Women’s Day: Miles to Walk, in the US and Across the Seas
2011 marks the 100th anniversary of International Women's Day – a day for the celebration of women worldwide. In 25 nations (including China, Afghanistan, Russia, Ukraine, Vietnam and Zambia), the day has become a national holiday, a time not only to cheer for women's advances, but also to reflect upon the many global inequalities women still face. 
We honor this day in the United States, too, and stand in solidarity with our sisters who are struggling to surmount injustice around the globe. But here at the Ms. Foundation, we know we must do more than look outward at the failures and fault-lines of equality beyond our borders. Today, this entire Women’s History Month, and throughout the year, we must take a hard look at our own country’s shortcomings. While we pride ourselves on our global leadership and our national ideals, there is no doubt that the US falls hideously short.
Of course, we need not look far. Whether it’s Representative Chris Smith’s (R-NJ) attempt to redefine rape and set the women’s movement – and our entire country – back decades, or Congressional attempts to defund Planned Parenthood and other Title X providers, it is clear that women’s reproductive rights and health are under blatant attack. But even before the Right’s most recent assault on women’s lives, the status of women’s health in the US has lagged far behind. Did you know, for example, that over the last 20 years, deaths from pregnancy and childbirth in the United States have doubled? And need we remind you that this is taking place in a nation that spends more than any other country in the world on health care?
And then there’s Wisconsin. While the battle over collective bargaining rights and unions is not being framed by mainstream media as a “woman’s issue,” it more than surely [E1] is. Women make up a majority of public sector workers at the state and local level – they also make up 56 per cent of the "working poor" and are most likely, alongside people of color, to benefit from union membership. As such, our friends at the Institute for Women’s Policy Research point out, women and their families stand to lose the most if workers’ rights in Wisconsin and elsewhere are dismantled. In a time of ongoing economic crisis in which women continue to lose jobs, this is an especially frightening prospect.
The current US political and economic climate alone makes women’s fate seem especially grim. But this should not obscure the fact that women have long experienced the disproportionate impact of harmful policies and gender discrimination. No matter the decade, if you’re a woman here in the US you’re more likely than a man to be poor, to earn minimum or below minimum wage, to pay more for health insurance…and the list goes on. This while only a small percentage of us are at policymaking tables where decisions are made that directly impact our lives.
And how do we compare to the rest of the world? Global statistics tell a striking story of just how poorly the US performs when it comes to promoting women’s well-being. Among 42 countries with “high human development” levels, the US currently ranks 37th -- in the bottom five of such countries -- in terms of gender equality according to the United Nations’ 2010 Human Development Report [pdf]. The World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Index [pdf], which analyzes rates of economic opportunity and participation, educational attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment to compile its ratings, puts the US in 19th place globally. That means women in America fare worse, by some measures, than our sisters in nations like Sri Lanka, South Africa and the Philippines, not to mention much of Western Europe and all of Scandinavia.
The bad news continues. The US currently ranks last among the 11 industrialized nations who are members of the Group of 10 in terms of both infant and maternal mortality rates. Our current gender wage gap of 19 cents places the US 64th [pdf] in the world. And we rank 73rd in terms of women's political leadership, falling behind nations like Rwanda, Uganda and Pakistan, and tying with Bosnia.
Frankly, it doesn't matter what list you turn to, or how you spin the data: check any of the published rankings of global inequality from a gendered perspective and nowhere will you see the US ranked in the top ten of nations closing the gender gap. Nowhere.
Shocking? Disappointing? Certainly -- yet if you understand the realities of daily life for most women in this country, the reason we maintain our embarrassingly low rankings, year after year, is disturbingly self-evident. Just ask the nearly 150 social justice organizations we support – groups led by and for women who, either through personal experience or through the lives of their members, come face to face with this unjust reality every day. They, better than anyone else, understand how urgent the need for change is.
Across the country, our grantees are fighting to win progressive changes that women in every corner of the world should be able to call their own. In Colorado, West Virginia, and other statehouses nationwide, they are fighting for reproductive justice, and against regressive measures that devalue women’s lives. In Wisconsin, Indiana and elsewhere, they are standing on the front lines to defend the right to collective bargaining now under attack. In Arizona, in Kentucky, and in Washington, DC, they’re taking on unjust immigration policies that disproportionately impact women and families. And at every level, whether city, state or federal, they’re fighting to ensure that women’s perspectives, and women leaders, are included at policymaking tables where key decision about our nation’s future are being made.
So, today, as the world pauses to celebrate the achievements of women worldwide, we honor our remarkable grantees. They, some of our country’s most treasured social justice trailblazers, are exemplary models of the kind of change-makers we should all aspire to be. We believe in their voices. We believe in their vision. We believe in their power to promote women’s well-being and create the just and inclusive democracy our nation was meant to be.
On this 100th International Women's Day, we stand with all women and girls -- down the street and around the world -- to cheer our wins and inspire us all to further action. We have come a long way… but we've got miles to walk, here in America and across the seas.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

17 Comments so far
Show AllReposting an article from yesterday with the most telling comment:
Published on Monday, March 7, 2011 by CommonDreams.org
The Imperative Of Women's Human Rights
Reflections On The 100th Anniversary Of International Women's Day
by Lucinda Marshall
Posted by singforpeace
Mar 8 2011 - 12:17am
Unfortunately, if you want to find the articles with the fewest comments, all you have to do is look for the word "women" in the title.
Paranoid: Keen observation. This subject is VERY uncomfortable to MANY men... hence the few comments. The statistics of anything but gender parity reflect the sad truth that women are not offered equal input in our society's decision making bodies. Heck, we're being forced back into the trenches to fight for rights we already won concerning our own bodies!
To the poster who spoke of the offensiveness of Porn, I agree. As to then using that matter as the segue into abortion... well, now you've slipped into OTHER turf.
Frankly, anyone brave or stupid enough to bring a child into the world now might be guilty of a worse crime. Do you really think the food and clean water will last? And given today's trends, what quality of life might those offspring confront?
Allowing the full term of a pregnancy or otherwise is a matter between a woman, her partner (if there is one who cares), and The Source. A nation that makes war at its pleasure is hardly in any moral position to judge or make law defining that decision for her. A nation that cuts programs for the poor, while turning education into some form of militaristic rote/robot model, is in no position to make that determination for half the population.
There are MANY things that could be said in response to this article and the statistics related. I've had a long day. Maybe someone else with wisdom and sensitivity would care to step in.
Good that you at least weighed in.
Shiney Varghese's article Reclaiming Rights on International Women’s Day Centennial below only has a cut and paste of my comment here. If you had any more thoughts handy now, you could stick a few in her replies so I don't be so alone there.
It's discouraging being a guy who has some feminist sympathies. To actually be an aware woman in this supposedly "post-feminist" era must be, at times, unimaginably awful.
Well, maybe instead of complaining that other people are not commenting, and reposting that complaint in multiple articles, and multiple posts, you might make a comment that isn't a complaint about other people not commenting,?
@AngryIrishman
- "I am appalled at the way that women are abused in other countries, especially Muslim countries, and the feminists in this country are strangely silent about it."
- "we, unlike the Muslims, do not murder those who insult us and our Lord?"
I personally am appalled by your Islamophobic bigotry trotted out in the name of liberal activism. But, hey, this is Common Dreams, where you strangle the human soul in the name of idealism.
Have you ever been to an Arab country? Have you ever spoken to Muslim women. I live in the Middle East and the women here are a damn sight less "abused" here than they are in America and the West, where they are in sexual fetters from age 3 for the glory of their parents and the sleazy charms of mass media.
Case in point - a girl in the office has started wearing a hijab. When I asked her why, she relied that it was her personal decision, not one that she needed to justify to me, but that part of the reason was modesty - so she would not appear a slut like 99% of western women are viewed here. I was shocked. It changed the way I view our so called freedoms in the west.
And if she does NOT want to wear a hijab? If she does NOT want to be "modest"? If she wants to appear to be a "slut"?
"" here than they are in America and the West, where they are in sexual fetters from age 3 for the glory of their parents and the sleazy charms of mass media.
"
Yes, women, in the west, are too dumb to make choices of their own. How paternalistic of you.
Not sure why you call me paternalistic when all I am doing is pointing out the obsession the West has with sex. I sense nothing I could ever say would change your views on Arab women, so I won't bother.
*yawn* Another right wing concernt troll
Why are you not appalled at the income and wealth gap between men and women?
Don't bother to answer. You don't give a rat's flying ass about women.
@rfloh
Let me get this straight - you call me a right wing troll, and then tell me not to answer! What's with that? That's so typical of a blinkered, ignorant, head-in-the-sand attitude to life.
This is becoming an increasingly common trend on Common Dreams - call someone a right winger - attack the man and not the point. How you could possibly know what I feel or don't feel about the plight of women is beyond me.
My initial comment was against Islamophobia and Western women - they ain't as free as they like to believe, pal. Perhaps you think 4-year old beauty pageants are cool. Perhaps you think putting a pre-pubescent girl on the cover of Vogue is cool. Perhaps you think push-up bras for 3-year-olds are cool. The West has lost its way here. It matters not a whit whether you agree with me or not.
For the record, I DO NOT buy into Angry Irishman's antiabortion position.
Why are people afraid to actually say what abortion is? I am definitely in favor of a woman's choice to abort or not to abort and it's nobody's business but her own. But there's no convincing me that abortion isn't killing a growing human life that, especially after the first trimester, can feel pain. Can't adults just call a spade a spade?
Why are you so certain that abortion is killing a human life that can feel pain? How do you define human? If you are so very certain, you should have absolutely no problem backing up your conviction with mounds of material science.
"Can't adults just call a spade a spade?.."
Because what might look like a spade to you might no necessarly look like a spade to other people.
Scientifically itis a growing body; Spiritually it is not a living human being until the first breath when the Soul enters and science is even moving towards the first breath being life: Until that point it is existence. Tony
Citing attacks by the far right on women's rights as evidence of women's oppression is a bit disingenuous. The fact is that those rights are the law,which is a testament to the heroic efforts of feminists in the past. Of course those rights must be defended. Citing the attack on unions as a women's issue is fine,but it is just as much a men's issue,so why not admit it is a human issue?
There are still battles to be fought for women in the west,but the article sounds a bit like a feminist institution spokesperson desperately trying to justify the continued existence of said institution. How about a more celebratory note on Women's Day?
I don't agree entirely with the article the following link will lead you to,but I'd like to hear what others think about it.
www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/for-the-free-educated-and-affluent-welcome-to-the-century-of-women/article1933187/
Did you miss the part where she pointed out income disparity?
Most of this article is good, though as usual, like most authors Rahman does not talk about the economic aspects enough, but this:
"And we rank 73rd in terms of women's political leadership, falling behind nations like Rwanda, Uganda and Pakistan, and tying with Bosnia.
"
is ridiculous. It is a ridiculous comparison with no context. A straight statistical comparison of politics in America and Pakistan, without context is ridiculous. 2 high ranking politicians, 2 high profile campaigners against Pakistan's blasphemy law have been killed. In the 1st instance, the murderer had lawyers in court lionising him. A 3rd, a woman (Asma Jahangir) has now become the most prominent and obvious target. She has effectively beren silenced as she is basically in hiding.