Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Afghan War is Brutal, Expensive, Unpopular, and Ineffective – So Why Are We Spending Billions on It?
Leading Afghan Feminist Wants the U.S. and NATO to Leave Her Nation
"The sad truth is that Obama’s war policies have turned out to be even more of a nightmare than I expected.” – Malalai Joya, A Woman Among Warlords
While millions of Americans are experiencing unemployment, wage stagnation, rising tuition, dwindling social services, and poverty at levels not seen since the Great Depression, an unjustifiably large proportion of our taxes are being used to cause death and destruction in Afghanistan. With Afghanistan being the longest war the U.S. has ever officially waged, we should carefully examine the costs of the war - financial and otherwise - and ask ourselves, is it really worth it?
Afghan activist and former Member of Parliament, Malalai Joya, wants the U.S. and NATO out of her country. She will soon embark on a new US speaking tour to help reinvigorate the war debate.
The war costs taxpayers between $500,000 to $1 million per soldier in Afghanistan every year. Since President Obama deployed thousands of more troops than Bush, the escalating war has come with a bloated price tag. So far, we have spent $336 billion on the war, and if Congress approves a request for additional funding, that number will go up to $455.4 billion – nearly half a trillion dollars. According to CostofWar.com, just the $120 billion in additional funding could fund 1.6 million elementary school teachers for a year, 1.9 million firefighters for a year, or $5,550 Pell Grants for 19.3 million students. A single month’s expenses on the Afghanistan war could pay for 46.9 billion meals for the hungry each month. Six months’ worth of Afghanistan war expenses could pay for school supplies for every single child in the world.
In addition to its financial price, the Afghanistan war is costing real human lives. Over the course of the entire war, at least 1,400 U.S. troops have been killed and over 10,000 wounded. The rate of deaths is also increasing, as more than a third of the total troops killed (499) died just during the past year. The price paid by ordinary Afghans is even greater. Not counting so-called insurgents, at least 2,412 civilians were killed and 3,803 were wounded in just the first 10 months of last year – these are most likely conservative estimates. The rate of Afghan civilian deaths is up 20 percent compared to the year before, directly corresponding to the increased troop levels under President Obama. In fact, over the course of the war, U.S.-led military actions have resulted in more direct civilian deaths (5,791 - 9,060) than “insurgent”-led actions (4,949 - 6,499).
Meanwhile, the U.S.-backed government in Afghanistan has no more legitimacy than Egypt’s embattled Mubarak regime. The 2009 elections in which President Hamid Karzai claimed victory were condemned internationally as fraudulent. Released documents showed that 100% of votes from dozens of polling places in provinces like Kandahar were for Karzai. Afghanistan’s Electoral Complaints Commission received thousands of complaints of fraud. Journalists easily purchased voter registration cards on the black market. Despite documentary evidence of criminal activity implicating top government officials and Karzai himself, the U.S. continues to legitimize the central government as the only alternative to the Taliban. There is also little criticism beyond vague assertions of “corruption” of members of the Afghan Parliament. Many Afghan MPs have a history of bloody war crimes, particularly during the post-Soviet era of the early 1990’s when tens of thousands of civilians were maimed, raped, and killed often with U.S.-supplied weapons. Today, those same men, considered the Taliban’s ideological brethren, control private militias, suck up millions of dollars of aid for their private gain, terrorize civilians, and are neck-deep in the drug trade.
It is no wonder then that leading Afghan activist and former Member of Parliament, Malalai Joya, wants the U.S. and NATO out of her country. Having come face-to-face with the brutality of war and the power that U.S.-backed war criminals wield, Joya has been demanding an end to the occupation for years. In her book, A Woman Among Warlords, just out in paperback, Joya explains the situation of ordinary Afghans: “[w]e are caught between two enemies – the Taliban on one side and the U.S./NATO forces and their warlord allies on the other.” She goes on to say that “for our people, Obama is a warmonger, like Bush. He follows the same disastrous policies, only with much more determination and force.”
Joya is the most outspoken Afghan to have been elected to Afghanistan’s Parliament. She is beloved by her people for daring to speak out against U.S.-backed war criminals that dominate the government and is targeted by those very warlords. In fact, Joya has survived at least 4 assassination attempts. She represents a majority of Afghans that want neither a foreign occupation with its fundamentalist lackeys in government nor their enemies the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Despite this, her opinions are rarely reflected in U.S. media.
By most accounts, violence is increasing. According to the Afghanistan NGO Safety Office (ANSO), attacks in Helmand and Kandahar rose by 124% and 20% last year compared to 2009. Furthermore, the violence has now spread to parts of the previously more peaceful North and East, but the U.S. military and its spokespeople continue to cast their failures as successes. For example, in a recent letter to U.S. troops, General David Petraeus said, “Throughout the past year, you and our Afghan partners worked together to halt a downward security spiral in much of the country and to reverse it in some areas of great importance.” He went on to cite specific progress in the Afghan capital Kabul as well as the traditional Taliban strongholds of the Helmand and Kandahar provinces, ignoring the fact that the number of attacks there are increasing. The ANSO, which provides security advice for organizations operating on the ground in Afghanistan, said in its quarterly report, “No matter how authoritative the source of any such claim [of progress], messages of this nature are solely intended to influence American and European public opinion.” As Malalai Joya says in her book, “It is all a lie – dust in the eyes of the world.”
Like Malalai Joya, most Afghans are painfully aware of the war’s spiral into violence and mayhem: a November 2010 survey by the Afghan Center for Socio-Economic and Opinion Research found that favorable opinions of the U.S. have hit an all-time low of 43% among Afghans. More than twice as many Afghans now blame the U.S. and NATO for violence compared to a year ago. Afghans are also less optimistic about the availability of jobs and economic opportunities, freedom of movement, and the rights of women compared to a year earlier. Americans share the Afghan opinion that the troops should leave. A CNN Opinion Research poll last December found that 63% now oppose the war.
In the last chapter of her book, Joya details her recommendations on how the world can really help Afghans, the first of which is to the end the U.S.-NATO war. She also explains the real humanitarian needs of the Afghan people that the international community could fulfill, and how this would have to go hand-in-hand with disarmament, especially of the warlords that have enjoyed foreign support for so long. Finally, Joya ardently demands all foreign troops to withdraw from her country, making a strong case for how any outbreak of civil war could be minimized through responsible international diplomacy.
According to Joya, “the truth about Afghanistan has been hidden behind a smoke screen of words and images carefully crafted by the United States and its NATO allies and repeated without question by the Western media.” Joya will speak directly to American audiences this spring in a nationwide tour intended to expose the brutality and futility of the war and clear the smoke screen. Her speaking tour comes ahead of a major push by antiwar activists to organize bi-coastal events protesting the Afghanistan war on April 9th and 10th 2011. Starting in mid-March, Joya will begin her tour in New York. From there, she heads to New Jersey, Washington D.C., Maryland, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington state, and California. Joya’s tour will culminate with her participation in San Francisco’s April 10th Antiwar Demonstration. Details of Malalai Joya’s Spring 2011 tour are online at www.afghanwomensmission.org.
Joya’s words can help Americans clear the “dust from our eyes” and face the reality that for all our sakes, the Afghanistan war must end sooner rather than later.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



65 Comments so far
Show All"The sad truth is that Obama’s war policies have turned out to be even more of a nightmare than I expected.”
That's a horrific understatement, if ever there was one!
(She should have at least added the adjectives "Kafkaesque" and "Orwellian";-)
Why are we spending billions? EMPIRES cost lots, thats why.
This is a resource war. If you want a reserve currency with the USD, you will need wars to control the resources.
Nothing complicated or new here.
right on rat - there isn't much confusion here. it is a grab for the oil and the natural gas, as libya will soon be as well.
it's called the great game - and it is empires who play it
it's brutal and heartless - no trick too dirty - just ask the brits who slaughtered everybody they saw for 500 years.
there is also the concept of peak oil and the bottom line is this: the white people - the amerikans and nato have declared anew the all out war for oil and gas. our whole civilization runs on it and those boys hate to pay retail
it's racism in the extreme - it's cecil rhodes in the 21 century and its ugly ugly
here are a few comments by cecil rhodes, for whom the rhodes scholarship is named:
We must find new lands from which we can easily obtain raw materials and at the same time exploit the cheap slave labor that is available from the natives of the colonies. The colonies would also provide a dumping ground for the surplus goods produced in our factories.
Pure philanthropy is very well in its way but philanthropy plus five percent is a good deal better.
I contend that we are the first race in the world, and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race...If there be a God, I think that what he would like me to do is paint as much of the map of Africa British Red as possible...
In order to save the forty million inhabitants of the United Kingdom from a bloody civil war, our colonial statesmen must acquire new lands for settling the surplus population of this country, to provide new markets... The Empire, as I have always said, is a bread and butter question.
To be born English is to win first prize in the lottery of life.
http://mmalkath.blogspot.com/2009/11/cecil-rhodes-man-or-beast.html
waht can you say......
Yesterday, I posted this incredible link here on CD at the Korten article but it has as much relevance to this article.
http://ampedstatus.com/the-road-to-world-war-iii-the-global-banking-cartel-has-one-card-left-to-play/
People, if I announce like I did yesterday that a link/website I am posting is VERY good, believe me, I mean it and would not waste your time if I didnt think so,
This is the kind of info/presentation that deserves to go viral. I am going to bring up this website a lot today. If you are interested in a great presentation on the Imperial global elites, please help get this info around. That's why I posted it yesterday under the heading of:
**********************************Info Alert*****************************
i checked the link out - it is a good one
thanks! i've got that #
Btw, I was going to send the link to Joe Baegant and just found out he has serious cancer. Damn, I hope he gets well, we need him and everybody like him. I exchanged email with him briefly a while back and he is the real deal, a real stand-up guy. Get well Joe we need your help to beat the basturds!
Freakin typo - it's spelled Bageant.
And for those who may wish to follow up.
**********************************Info Alert*****************************
The Next Chapter: The Road to Revolution
http://daviddegraw.org/
medmedude wrote:
"it's called the great game - and it is empires who play it
it's brutal and heartless - no trick too dirty - just ask the brits who slaughtered everybody they saw for 500 years."
It's not just the British.
Look at history and you'll see that almost every nation has done it, or tried to do it.....Spain, France, Turkey, and on and on.
America has long had a psychotic and hypocritical stance of declaring grand ideals of equality & democracy blah, blah, blah, that the inhabitants kid themselves into believing is reality but they couldn't wait to get started on the Native American Indians let alone their own selves to conquer, exploit and step over countless bodies to grab what they could in any manner they wished.
Granted that not everyone in the USA is like that (despite what may appear) but the general direction and aims of the nation as a whole have always been the same with a cloying, insipid belief in 'American Exceptionalism" mired in religion, commerce, and old fashioned arrogance & greed.
I currently see the USA populace as becoming closer to realising and acknowledging all of this, a (very) slow awakening as to what the world has known for a very long time then moving beyond it all, but the collective powers that be and vested interests are even more determined than ever to retain the status quo and only give 'advancements' in society when it benefits them and not the people.
The USA has long viewed the world from the wrong end of the telescope, seeing it as containing 'lesser humans' because they aren't Americans, can't be fathomed or understood in the framework of mental references that the sociological myths that are engendered and encouraged to believe in the American mindset.
But there's hope because as a guide for example using the general trend of Common Dreams user comments, you can see they've changed these past years. There's an underlying demand for change for the better and continual outrage of what's being done in their name.
No longer are users being satisfied with the many facades that have always been held up as being reality & truth and such illusions have already reached the state of being demonstrably farcical and clearly outright blatant lies.
The collective American mindset has always been arrogant and the moment any criticism or alternate visions are proposed then like good little wind-up robots they'll defend the very things that need to be changed.
The mindset has to be continually bolstered up with the reinforcement that they are unique and the USA status quo must be maintained at all costs and because of all of that the mindset is quite literally terrified of change even if it benefits them. If they admit that one part if at fault then like a house of cards the whole shaky ensemble may fall apart at a moments notice taking them down with it. -- No, better to believe what they're told, how to act & respond and all will be well.....
They imagine that the world outside planet America is too scary and terrifying to contemplate, full of ideas and ideals, ever-present dangers that threaten Americans lives. The terror, panic and confusion must be kept up at all costs against all other countries & peoples.....and if need be, against their own American people as well.
It's nothing new.
The trouble is that people are also thrashing around like gasping fishes out of water desperately trying to latch onto any saving grace of their old dogmas that give them temporary and imagined solace of stability.
What's desperately needed is a complete and different social paradigm, not some tried-before-and-failed claptrap of make-believe equalities under any 'ism' name you can shake a stick at that are engineered to favour a few and exploit all others either immediately or eventually for that takes you right back to where you are right now. Stop repeating history.
So many people in the past & present realise that the entire of humanity must move beyond what has brought the world and it's peoples to it's current state. It's not just about one country, it's about everyone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9e7RU5BClYc
http://www.thevenusproject.com/en/the-venus-project-introduction/about
One of the more notable statements from this article is the one which points out that Malalai Joya's "opinions are rarely reflected in US media." One would not expect any of the demagogues of Fox "News" to have Ms. Joya on their programs. But what is the excuse of The New York Times not to run this article in the Op Ed section of their paper? Or The Washington Post? Is not the motto of the N.Y.Times All the News That's Fit To Print?
Ideally ,in a democracy like the United States, different points of view should be presented to its people besides the propaganda that is so often heard from the government, the military and those on the right. But to quote from Ms. Joya, that belief "is all a lie-dust in the eyes of the world."
The difference between Fox and entities like the NYT is one of degree, not one of kind.
The NYT and Washington Post don't publish articles like this because they receive much of their profits from the military industrial complex. They reflect the Washington view, which reflects the view that money made in war spends the same as money made in humanitarian ways. We have become a nation that exports war as its basis of being. We kill children and then apologize. I thought when you slaughtered children you went to prison. Not when you wear the US military uniform, because then baby killing wins you medals and your family calls you a hero. As long as people worship the slaughter of innocents, America will remain at war.
Tom C. correctly notes that "We have become a nation that exports war as its basis of being." This trenchant statement is affirmed by a bumper sticker that I will be receiving shortly which points out that:
War Is the Health of the State-Randolph Bourne, The State
I have a custom bumpr sticker on my car that says WH'O'S TERRORISM?
If Obama's daughters, Bush's daughters and my neighbors children had to participate in America's wars, these wars would end.
These wars will never touch 98% of Americans - so Americans don't care.
America is a nation lacking empathy.
"BOOTLICKING, n. A popular American mass participation sport which is rapidly displacing baseball as the 'national pastime.' " -Chaz Bufe, The Devil's Dictionaries ["American Heretic's Dictionary" section].
"COLLATERAL DAMAGE, n. Dead and maimed civilians"-Chaz Bufe, The Devil's dictionaries ["American Heretic's Dictionary" section]
"DUTY, n. A concept of slaves, a tool of tyrants. Doing what other people want you to do because they want you to do it." [to paraphrase Oscar Wilde]-Chaz Bufe, The Devil's Dictionaries ["American Heretic's Dictionary" section]
"GLORY, n. An exalted state achieved through participation in military operations, often by having one's guts blown out and dying in agony amidst the stench of one's own entrails."-Chaz Bufe, The Devil's Dictionaries ["American Heretic's Dictionary" section].
"PATRIOT, n. One to whom the interests of a part seem superior to those of the whole. The dupe of statesmen and the tool of conquerors."-Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
"PATRIOT, n. A dangerous tool of the powers that be. A herd member who compensates for lack of self-respect by identifying with an abstraction. An enemy of individual freedom. A fancier of the rich, arousing odor of boot leather."-Chaz Bufe, The Devil's Dictionaries ["American Heretic's Dictionary" section].
"PATRIOTISM, n. Combustible rubbish ready to the torch of any one ambitious to illuminate his name. In Dr. Johnson's famous dictionary patriotism is defined as the last resort of a scoundrel. With all due respect to an enlightened but inferior lexicographer, I beg to submit that it is the first."-Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
"PATRIOTISM, n.
1) The inability to distinguish between the government and one's 'country'.
20. A highly praiseworthy virtue characterized by the desire to dominate and kill.
3) A felling of exultation experienced when contemplating heaps of 'enemy' corpses.
4) The first, last, and perennial refuge of scoundrels."
Chaz Bufe, The Devil's Dictionaries ["American Heretic's Dictionary" section].
"REGRETTABLE NECESSITY, n. An avoidable atrocity. The term is often employed by presidents and prime ministers when announcing bombings of civilian targets and invasions of small countries."-Chaz Bufe, The Devil's Dictionaries ["American Heretic's Dictionary" section].
Amen to that. But that's why so many Americans are in poverty or falling into poverty -- they're meeting their recruitment goals very well. "Amazing" that before the fall of 2008 the MIC was having difficulty with recruitment -- then came the Great Depression II. Now, if I was a conspiracy theorist ... I just don't know, but the whole thing is very sick. What would America be if it didn't A) send the lower middle class and the poor into wars to kill other people for the MIC and BigOil and/or B) send those that don't sign up for the wars into the Prison Industrial Complex, thanks mostly to our ridiculous war on drugs (especially marijuana, which neither BigPharma nor BigAlcohol want legalized)
It seems to me that this is who we are. And then there's Hollywood, which glorifies it all and ties what we have become in a big, messy package. In watching what little commercial TV I do in one hour I was bombarded mainly with BigPharma commercials and commercials for incredibly violent movies coming to an Imax or 3D theater near you.
Hey, Samalabear!
I admit this thinking, of war as a job, simply astounds me...
one would send their kid into any battle just for money? to get them out of the house?
if my kid seriously told me he was considering enlisting as simply getting a job, I would immediately offer to beat the signing bonus, or whatever...
you wouldn't pay a few thousand to keep your kid whole, and other parents' kids, as well?
I don't understand...
save your money, save a honey...
share a house, spare a spouse...
is killing really an acceptable alternative to babysitting, or burger-flipping?
I cannot consider today's military honorable...
"is killing really an acceptable alternative to babysitting, or burger-flipping?"
I'm guessing that flipping burgers pays better than "serving" as a private in the US Army. I know for sure it is a far more honorable endeavor.
That's also my thinking on why the US will never have universal health care-- everyone with the same access no matter what their employment status or income. (Yes, I also know how powerful the insurance industry is.) They would have a hard time encouraging people to enlist if they couldn't wave those benefits in front of them.
"The Afghan War is Brutal, Expensive, Unpopular, and Ineffective – So Why Are We Spending Billions on It?"
Because it is extremely profitable for those who buy, pay for and literally own politicians.
"America is a nation lacking empathy."
Your comment is my nomination for understatement of the year.
I think you put your finger on something that the article and other posters have missed.
I often think that even more than being a resource war, this ongoing slaughter is simply profitable for the 'defense' corporations.
At this point, I'm not sure that anyone believes that the US will pacify the land and the natural gas will flow freely, etc.
It is so easy for the warmongers. Do you know any Afghans? I don't. I don't know anyone who does. USA citizens have a hard time getting worked up about people they don't know. We at this site do, but most do not, whether because of lack of compassion, or because they are overwhelmed. So Afghanistan is the perfect place to allow an ongoing war that will fill corporate coffers for just about forever. You can think of other countries that might follow. They have to be largely anonymous and far away. You don't even need a security reason, really, just invent one. Turkmenistan? Sure. Tajikistan? Who ever heard of anyone from there? Yeah, why not. Mozambique, Namibia, Mongolia? Possible candidates to be sure.
Truly and deeply depressing.
"If Obama's daughters, Bush's daughters and my neighbors children had to participate in America's wars, these wars would end.
These wars will never touch 98% of Americans - so Americans don't care.
America is a nation lacking empathy."
..egg2001
why whatever do you, mean? my newscaster told us about the slaughter in libya and went quickly on to say, "americans are concerned...
...how this will affect pump prices."
could i make something like that up?
Unfortunately I'm sure you didn't make that up, and that pretty much sums up why people all over the globe hate Americans. I have to believe, though, that that attitude stems more from the corporate controllers of the media. Hummingbird -- why not call that newscaster out for saying such a callous thing! Even if it was the national news -- call them, write them -- tell them what a disgusting statement that was and that YOU are concerned for the Libyan people.
Why? Because the neocons want it.
This article is informative about what its going on in Afghanistan but doesn't really answer the question "WHY"? Of course, anyone who's read the PNAC docs back in 2000, watched the WTC defy the laws of gravity and collapse, and witnessed the illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan knows the answer.
~ According to Joya, “the truth about Afghanistan has been hidden behind a smoke screen of words and images carefully crafted by the United States and its NATO allies and repeated without question by the Western media.” ~
what truth? that almost the entire world's supply of heroin is flowing out of there, and wasn't doing so until after we arrived?
you can't see organized crime? not if you shut your eyes...
sometimes, it wears formal attire, and holds high office...
sometimes, it wears a military uniform, and gets slaughtered...
or slaughters others...
soon, it will look like a drone...
Wars use all the tax revenue resulting in trillion dollar deficits which give republicans an excuse to abolish unions, cut funds for social programs that benefit the poor, sick, elderly, disabled, pregnant women, children, head start, education and health care. This will destroy America. It is just what Osama bin Ladin has been trying to achieve. America wasting money and blood in Iraq and Afghanistan helping Osama bin Ladin win his war of terror. Americans terrified they will be homeless, hungry, jobless, lacking access to education, health care, a living wage clean water, air, food. The republicans are the answer to bin Ladin's prayers.
"This will destroy America."
That is part of the plan.
I get your point, but don't inadvertently prop up the fictional Osama bin Laden story line.
There is zero proof that he did it. There is testimony to his murder, but then Bhutto was killed just weeks after uttering those words.
Not one Al Qaeda operative, planner, schemer has been put on trial. No financiers have been prosecuted. There really seems to be no there, there.
The only thing the government "has", is KSM, whose "confession" of being the mastermind was gotten by water boarding at some point, over the duration of over 180 torture sessions. Of course, we'll never see the video of that tortured confession.
The rest of the so-called dangerous detainees, apparently can't be tried, because they've been tortured, and/or, we have zero evidence to their involvement in 9/11.
Isn't it interesting, that almost 10 years, after those horrible events, with the tools of the NSA, FBI, Pentagon, State Dept, the actual network of conspirators and financiers has yet to be brought before the American people as perpetrators in mass murder.
But, hey, whatever you do NEVER, and I mean NEVER, EVER, question the events of 9/11. Not here, not on Daily Kos, not on Hufpo, not on Truthout, not anywhere!
We don't talk about that, or else.
hue sir
Very well said.
911 was an inside job, by whom, we do not know, all we know is the official con-- conspiracy theory is total BS to anyone that will take the time to research it. If nothing else check out WTC #7. A few days ago Rummy was asked about WTC #7 and to quote him: " NEVER HEARD OF IT" ! Hue, you are correct, there is a total censorship and news blackout about 911. Even Amy Goodman is not the exception to the rulers on this cover-up. Someone out there in the shadows has one hell of a lot of power!
"Someone out there in the shadows has one hell of a lot of power!"
FBI National Security Letters, or NSL's, would be an excellent tool in support of your commentary. NSL's are effectively "warrants" that the FBI creates by itself without judicial oversight that allows the FBI to investigate any facet of any thing or situation. Individuals receiving NSL's are forbidden by law to even mention the fact that one has received one of these "warrants" giving the FBI the power to investigate anything it wants to. The FBI could conceivably warn an individual of dire consequences were that individual to insist on exercising his or her right of free speech. The intent/content of the investigation is kept secret and the target of the investigation is required to remain silent about it. It would definitely be a great way to keep Amy Goodman or anyone else quiet regarding "forbidden" knowledge.
After 10 years, the actual perps of 9/11 have not been brought up on charges. The reason is very simple and obvious to anyone who watches Columbo or any other detective show on the boob-tube. No real investigation has been done. We have a whitewash/coverup called the "OGS" (Official Government Story) 9/11 Commission nonsense and The Bush Crime Family refusing to even start an investigation for 444 days after the mass-murder inn New York City. That's a clue kiddies--it's known as "guilty demeanor" in the business of basic police work.
I'm sorry, but OBL had almost zero to do with 9/11 or world-wide terror. Want to hang the terror thing on the actual perps? Try USA, CIA, NSA, Mossad, MI6, PNAC, The Military-Industrial-Security-Police state-War profiteer complex. That about covers all the terror you see in this world. Don't mouth that Osama crap you keep hearing on CNN. Poor old pathetic Osama died of kidney failure in December 2001.
" So why are we spending billions on it"? That depends who you are, because from a war profiteers point of view, you are making billions!
Why is it legal to profit from wars?
Because the warmongers now write the laws. It's not only legal, but profit is mandatory.
Honestly, I didn't really want to hear the reason. I was afraid it might sound something like- or exactly like- what you wrote.
BULLS EYE!
"The Afghan War is Brutal, Expensive, Unpopular, and Ineffective – So Why Are We Spending Billions on It?"
-- A lot of good comments above already answered this question.
Here is another reason why the empire wants to continue spending billions on it:
"The United States has discovered nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral deposits in Afghanistan, far beyond any previously known reserves and enough to fundamentally alter the Afghan economy and perhaps the Afghan war itself, according to senior American government officials.
The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe...
The corruption that is already rampant in the Karzai government could also be amplified by the new wealth, particularly if a handful of well-connected oligarchs, some with personal ties to the president, gain control of the resources...
At the same time, American officials fear resource-hungry China will try to dominate the development of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth, which could upset the United States, given its heavy investment in the region. After winning the bid for its Aynak copper mine in Logar Province, China clearly wants more, American officials said. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/world/asia/14minerals.html
--- So, there it is folks... 'given [the US's] heavy investment in [Afghanistan]', the empire will stay until it knows that these newly found minerals are safely in the hands of US corporations who will be able to make massive amounts of profits raping and pillaging the land. Once the area where the minerals are located are safe for mining, the US officials will tout with glee that they created jobs and a new economy for the Afghani's. But, essentially what they will be doing is creating a new Haiti.
Spot on! Afghanistan will be turned into one big open pit mine, just like
West Virginia, and to hell with the Afghans, right along with the West Virginians. Who the hell do they think they are, anyway? We do it to our own, so there will be little incentive not to do it to the Afghans.
I think that this "previously unknown" bit is a canard. I think the Soviets knew about minerals in Afghanistan a long time ago. And the 1 trillion figure sounds to me like something the propaganda department pulled out of its anatomy. The US floated this story just to make its citizens all feel good about throwing good after bad in its doomed effort to subjugate the country.
Here's an article from Wired:
http://tinyurl.com/2bqzhh9
Maybe so... but the more important point (if you read between the lines) is that this article gives the game away and reveals the real motives of empire.
One thing you can be sure of- its all about the oil. US in Afghanistan, Iraq, and now massing military potential (totally against the wishes of the people) to intervene in Libya if necessary (that is, if it appears the people don't want to give us our oil which happens to be under thier land). All about oil. Oil to feed the economic engines that power "America's lifestyle" which GW Bush reminded us is our right. Oil that makes the rich richer.
Obama is apparently too much of a lightweight progressive to be able to fend off the directives of the oil industry people that are the "men behind the curtain". Who knows- maybe wishful thinking in a wierd way- that the pressure and the threats have been so real that he had no choice but to go along with them.
That, and the continued sentiment among the developed nations- US in particular- that they are entitled to anything they want and can get by whatever means necessary. And I'm talkin' you and me, folks. Cars. Clothes. Bananas. Toys for our kids. Cell phones. Computers. Ipads. That new appliance. Do you want the new Ipad? Then you have the answer to the question posted by the writer of this article.
Let us not forget that it is also oil which literally drives those tanks and other vehicles which are roaming around the deserts of the Middle East. Without that precious commodity called oil the U.S. war machine falls apart. Nick Turse cogently writes about this as well as other ubiquitous facts about the military in his book called The Complex: How the Military Invades Our Everyday Lives.
Obama is about as progressive as George W. Shrub. As for the new iPad, sure, who wouldn't want an $800 electronic toy manufactured in China by slave labor at a cost of about a dollar each?
Thankyou Sonali,you and Malalai are in my prayers.Thankyou both for your good work.
peace