Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
From Middle East to Madison, Justice Depends on Public Spaces
What happens when people have no place to gather as citizens?
The influence of the new digital commons in democratic uprisings from Tunisia to Egypt to Bahrain has been chronicled at length in news reports from the Middle East, with Facebook, twitter and other social media winning praise as dictatorbusters.
But the importance of a much older form of commons in these revolts has earned scant attention—the public spaces where citizens rally to voice their discontent, show their power and ultimately articulate a new vision for their homelands. To celebrate their victory over the Mubarak regime, for example, protesters in Cairo jubilantly returned to Tahrir Square, where the revolution was born, to pick up trash.
Egyptians celebrate their democratic victory in Tahrir Square. Photo by Ramy Raoof under a Creative Commons license via flickr.com)
It’s the same story all over the Middle East. In Libya’s capital city of Tripoli, people express their aspirations and face bloody reprisals in Green Square and Martyr’s Square. In Bahrain, they boldly march in Pearl Square in the capital city of Manama. In Yemen, protests have taken place in public spaces near the university in Sanaa, which students renamed Tahrir Square. Kept out of the central Revolution Square in Tehran by the repressive government, Iranian dissidents gather in Valiasr Square and Vanak Sqaure.
Last week in Tunisia, they changed the name of the main square in Tunis to honor Mohammad Bouazizi, an unlicensed street vendor whose suicide in December in response to government harassment sparked the revolution that toppled the regime of Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali.
The course of recent history was rewritten by events happening in Prague’s Wenceslas Square as dissidents ousting an oppressive regime in December 1989 helped bring down Communism. Those protests were inspired in part by events in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square that seized the world’s imagination earlier that year when democracy activists unsuccessfully challenged the power of China’s dictatorship.
This is not just an Old World thing. The Boston Common has been a sight of protests, and public gatherings for three centuries. In 1713, two hundred Bostonians protested food shortages in the city and in 1969 100,000 protested the Vietnam War.
The state capitol in Madison, where thousands of workers now protest the Wisconsin governor’s fierce attacks on collective bargaining rights, represent another case of a public commons becoming a staging ground for political resistance. The capitol, which sits right in the heart of downtown Madison, was named by Project for Public Spaces as one of the great public spaces of the world “This is truly the town square that early Americans imagined as the crux of democracy,” the PPS website explains.
The people rallying behind public sector union workers at the Capital are actually protected by the Wisconsin state constitution, which forbids the legislature from denying public access to the building when it is in session. State law does permit capitol groundskeepers to clear the building in an emergency, presumably on orders of the governor, but those groundskeepers are presumably members of the same union the governor wants to crush.
This all shows that the exercise of democracy depends upon having a literal commons where people can gather as citizens—a square, Main Street, park or other public space that is open to all. An alarming trend in American life is the privatization of our public realm. As corporate run shopping malls replaced downtowns as the center of action, we lost some of our public voice. You can’t organize a rally, hand out flyers, or circulate a petition in a shopping mall without the permission of the management, who almost certainly will say no because they don’t want to distract shoppers’ attention from the merchandise. That’s why you see few benches or other gathering spots inside malls, which limits our abilities to even discuss the issues of the day (or any other subject) with our fellow citizens.
Of course, public spaces enrich our lives in many ways beyond protests. Local commons become the site of celebrations, festivals, art events, memorial services and other expressions of a community.
The moment when I first became aware of the importance of public spaces was when the Minnesota Twins won their first ever World Series in 1987. I did not have tickets to the game but gathered hopefully with thousands of others outside the stadium in Minneapolis to share in the joy of the victory. When the Twins won the game, thousands more poured out of the ballpark into the streets and we all marched to…where? Minneapolis has no downtown square or landmark gathering place so we milled around the streets for a while—an unsatisfying way to celebrate a World Series championship. If it had been the Red Sox, everyone would head for the Boston Common. We weren’t so lucky.
I’ve often wondered if this lack of a central commons in Minneapolis and most other American communities somehow inhibits our civic expression. With no place to voice our views as citizens, do we become more passive about what happens to our country and our future? I don’t know the answer, but I imagine Hosni Mubarak wishes he had built a shopping mall in Tahrir Square.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



7 Comments so far
Show AllSpring time, 2011 rebirth of the Feminine, crush the decrepit gagging Global Oligarchy.
Noon Saturday 26 all State and World Capitals end the oppression.
All Power to the People and Anonymous!
Where I live the town commons is the shopping plaza centered on a Wal-Mart (and funded with municipal and state taxpayer money). They destroyed some prime farm land to build it and threatened a rare species of mussel in the local creek. If you hold any sort of impromptu gathering in a public space, you're likely to be harrassed by the local police and storeowners. Most of the sheeple here like it that way but not me. I might start my revolution of one some day soon.
this work is much more powerful as analogy...
public spaces are important, but do not address the underlying...
a common dream (!)...
unless common spaces come to dominate socially and economically, and private property wanes, eventually to disappear altogether, a large public space will simply be a place to bring many victims into easy reach of a given weapon...
until we are ready to remove the banker and his henchmen as the deciders of whether or not land and resources are common or privately held, we thumb twiddle over job losses while the wealthy plan our lives and deaths...
Protest? Protest what, precisely? To what end? Who says?
take your life back, take the land back...
Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...unanimous, planetwide rejection of the modern world...cessation of industry and energy use...negation of title to property and contractual obligation...
a return to individual engagement in local living...sharing and defending local resources with one's immediate neighbors...
dubet says: "Protest? Protest what, precisely? To what end? Who says?"
dubet,
Perhaps you haven't noticed but the spontaneous uprisings in Wisconsin and across the Arab world have involved considerable cooperative efforts to peacefully protect and provide support for the protesters, who particularly in the case of the Arab world are taking serious risks to obtain their freedom.
Your answer to your own rhetorical question seems to be to deal a death blow to the economic and political structures which both oppress us and sustain us and to do so in ways that would put all of us at extreme risk.
The end state that you imagine you can achieve with the rash action you propose may or may not be a desirable destination, but resolving the challenges we face - including global warming and peak oil which might suggest a similar solution or destination to the one you seem to propose - involve more than simply replacing corrupt governments, which have been bought by wealthy people and their corporations.
The challenges we face include overcoming our own justifiable fear that we risk destroying ourselves, our communities, and our children, if we do not arrange for taking care of each other during the transition we need to make to democracy, much less during the even greater transition we need to make in order to completely restructure the economy and the legal system which holds it together. You apparently believe these changes can be accomplished on a planet-wide basis simply by some sort of massive strike and epidemic refusal to cooperative with those in power.
Perhaps you haven’t noticed but Egyptians in Tafrir Square and Wisconsinites in Madison have even taken pains to pick up the trash. That of course is a relatively easy thing to do, but it is nevertheless an important and beautiful expression of the deliberate respect and care these protesters have for one another and for the rest of us.
Among the challenges we face, whether in Cairo or in Madison or in Washington D.C., is figuring out how we can transform our governments and decision making processes in ways that establish and protect democracy.
I seriously doubt that you have a clue what a voting procedure which is consistent with the consent of the self-governed, majority rule, and consensus decision making would look like, since the voting procedures we now use to elect representatives around the world (including in the United States) whether “first past the post” plurality voting or Instant Runoff Voting do not satisfy these important criteria.
You may get a kick out of repeatedly calling for “unanimous, planet-wide rejection of the modern world...cessation of industry and energy use...negation of title to property and contractual obligation...” starting September 22, 2012, but I for one would be more likely to respond to the suggestions, insights, and call to action of “Two Americans”. You simply fail to provide any real substance in support of what you repeatedly propose ad absurdum.
Please pardon me for concluding, as I suspect many others here have as well, that you are either a fool or are simply mocking the need for genuine, non-violent revolution across the world. Perhaps you might consider engaging in more serious discussion here with others in these comments about what is takes to bring about real political and economic change.
~ Please pardon me for concluding, as I suspect many others here have as well, that you are either a fool or are simply mocking the need for genuine, non-violent revolution across the world. ~
call me whatever you wish...
in my opinion, our industrial and chemical devastation render every other position literally moot...when combined with the technological horrors being actively prepared for those without means, the future is arriving quickly, and time for planning is waning...time for action is nigh...
whatever the cost, these activities must be ended, and very soon...the only way to end them is to pull the financing and energy...the financing originates in the control of the land and resources, the energy from several places...
there will be no real political or economic change unless we stop ruining our planet, as we will all be dead...
ruining our planet is fundamentally necessary to the making of money and product...
whatever hardships will arise as a result of a transition away from industry and money and product will be less than those otherwise...
perhaps, you would answer the question: what follows the genuine, non-violent revolution you suggest I mock...especially where the ownership of property is concerned? I don't believe you advocated other than a vote...
again, call me a fool, but I do not believe you will reach a desirable end via the voting process, no matter how pure...
you ignore the role of evil...
wasn't Kennedy elected by a vote?
the only way out is back, and together...
please either pass my posts, or supply an idea, yourself...
beyond voting, that is...
I, too, appreciate many of Two Americas' posts...
"There is absolutely no greater high than challenging the power structure as a nobody, giving it your all, and winning!"
Abbie Hoffman
Without doubt quality public spaces are important to society politically and culturally.