Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Egypt's Day of Reckoning
Mubarak regime may not survive new protests as flames of anger spread through Middle East
A day of prayer or a day of rage? All Egypt was waiting for the Muslim Sabbath today – not to mention Egypt's fearful allies – as the country's ageing President clings to power after nights of violence that have shaken America's faith in the stability of the Mubarak regime.
Five men have so far been killed and almost 1,000 others have been imprisoned, police have beaten women and for the first time an office of the ruling National Democratic Party was set on fire. Rumours are as dangerous as tear gas here. A Cairo daily has been claiming that one of President Hosni Mubarak's top advisers has fled to London with 97 suitcases of cash, but other reports speak of an enraged President shouting at senior police officers for not dealing more harshly with demonstrators.
Mohamed ElBaradei, the opposition leader and Nobel prize-winning former UN official, flew back to Egypt last night but no one believes – except perhaps the Americans – that he can become a focus for the protest movements that have sprung up across the country.
Already there have been signs that those tired of Mubarak's corrupt and undemocratic rule have been trying to persuade the ill-paid policemen patrolling Cairo to join them. "Brothers! Brothers! How much do they pay you?" one of the crowds began shouting at the cops in Cairo. But no one is negotiating – there is nothing to negotiate except the departure of Mubarak, and the Egyptian government says and does nothing, which is pretty much what it has been doing for the past three decades.
People talk of revolution but there is no one to replace Mubarak's men – he never appointed a vice-president – and one Egyptian journalist yesterday told me he had even found some friends who feel sorry for the isolated, lonely President. Mubarak is 82 and even hinted he would stand for president again – to the outrage of millions of Egyptians.
The barren, horrible truth, however, is that save for its brutal police force and its ominously docile army – which, by the way, does not look favourably upon Mubarak's son Gamal – the government is powerless. This is revolution by Twitter and revolution by Facebook, and technology long ago took away the dismal rules of censorship.
Mubarak's men seem to have lost all sense of initiative. Their party newspapers are filled with self-delusion, pushing the massive demonstrations to the foot of front pages as if this will keep the crowds from the streets – as if, indeed, by belittling the story, the demonstrations never happened.
But you don't need to read the papers to see what has gone wrong. The filth and the slums, the open sewers and the corruption of every government official, the bulging prisons, the laughable elections, the whole vast, sclerotic edifice of power has at last brought Egyptians on to their streets.
Amr Moussa, the head of the Arab League, spotted something important at the recent summit of Arab leaders at the Egyptian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh. "Tunisia is not far from us," he said. "The Arab men are broken." But are they? One old friend told me a frightening story about a poor Egyptian who said he had no interest in moving the corrupt leadership from their desert gated communities. "At least we now know where they live," he said. There are more than 80 million people in Egypt, 30 per cent of them under 20. And they are no longer afraid.
And a kind of Egyptian nationalism – rather than Islamism – is making itself felt at the demonstrations. January 25 is National Police Day – to honour the police force who died fighting British troops in Ishmaelia – and the government clucked its tongue at the crowds, telling them they were disgracing their martyrs. No, shouted the crowds, those policemen who died at Ishmaelia were brave men, not represented by their descendants in uniform today.
This is not an unclever government, though. There is a kind of shrewdness in the gradual freeing of the press and television of this ramshackle pseudo-democracy. Egyptians had been given just enough air to breathe, to keep them quiet, to enjoy their docility in this vast farming land. Farmers are not revolutionaries, but when the millions thronged to the great cities, to the slums and collapsing houses and universities, which gave them degrees and no jobs, something must have happened.
"We are proud of the Tunisians – they have shown Egyptians how to have pride," another Egyptian colleague said yesterday. "They were inspiring but the regime here was smarter than Ben Ali in Tunisia. It provided a veneer of opposition by not arresting all the Muslim Brotherhood, then by telling the Americans that the great fear should be Islamism, that Mubarak was all that stood between them and 'terror' – a message the US has been in a mood to hear for the past 10 years."
There are various clues that the authorities in Cairo realised something was afoot. Several Egyptians have told me that on 24 January, security men were taking down pictures of Gamal Mubarak from the slums – lest they provoke the crowds. But the vast number of arrests, the police street beatings – of women as well as men – and the near-collapse of the Egyptian stock market bear the marks of panic rather than cunning.
And one of the problems has been created by the regime itself; it has systematically got rid of anyone with charisma, thrown them out of the country, politically emasculating any real opposition by imprisoning many of them. The Americans and the EU are telling the regime to listen to the people – but who are these people, who are their leaders? This is not an Islamic uprising – though it could become one – but, save for the usual talk of Muslim Brotherhood participation in the demonstrations, it is just one mass of Egyptians stifled by decades of failure and humiliation.
But all the Americans seem able to offer Mubarak is a suggestion of reforms – something Egyptians have heard many times before. It's not the first time that violence has come to Egypt's streets, of course. In 1977, there were mass food riots – I was in Cairo at the time and there were many angry, starving people – but the Sadat government managed to control the people by lowering food prices and by imprisonment and torture. There have been police mutinies before – one ruthlessly suppressed by Mubarak himself. But this is something new.
Interestingly, there seems no animosity towards foreigners. Many journalists have been protected by the crowds and – despite America's lamentable support for the Middle East's dictators – there has not so far been a single US flag burned. That shows you what's new. Perhaps a people have grown up – only to discover that their ageing government are all children.
Internet and text messages fail in 'facebook revolution'
Egyptian authorities last night disrupted internet services and mobile-phone text messaging in efforts to stop protesters keeping in touch on social networking sites. The measure was taken as members of an elite counter-terrorism police unit were ordered to take up positions in key locations around Cairo in preparation for a wave of mass rallies today.
Among the places where they are stationed is Tahrir Square, where one of the biggest demonstrations took place. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other social networking sites have played a vital role in Egypt's protest movement, just as they did in Tunisia, enabling demonstrators to keep in touch and to organise rallies.
Who could succeed Hosni Mubarak?
Gamal Mubarak
Protesters on the streets of Egypt aren't just rallying against the 30-year-reign of President Hosni Mubarak, they are also taking aim at his son Gamal Mubarak, 47, an urbane former investment banker who has scaled the political ladder, prompting speculation that he is being groomed for his father's post.
The youngest son of Mr Mubarak and his half-Welsh wife, Suzanne, Gamal was educated at the elite American University in Cairo, going on to work for the Bank of America.
He entered politics about a decade ago, quickly moving up to become head of the political secretariat of his father's National Democratic Party (NDP). He was heavily involved in the economic liberalisation of Egypt, which pleased investors but provoked the ire of protesters, who blame the policies for lining the pockets of the rich while the poor suffered.
Although he has always denied having an eye on his father's throne, a mysterious campaign sprung up last year, with posters plastered across Cairo calling for Gamal to stand for president in elections scheduled for later this year. His 82-year-old father has not yet declared his candidacy.
Certainly the protesters appeared unhappy with the chosen son, chanting "Gamal, tell your father Egyptians hate you" and tearing up his picture.
Mohamed ElBaradei
Protests in Egypt today will be different from the others that have swept the Middle East in recent weeks in one important way. Mohamed ElBaradei, former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), landed at Cairo airport last night to lead rallies against Hosni Mubarak's rule.
The 68-year-old was born in the Egyptian capital, from where he launched a legal career. He joined the IAEA in the 1980s, becoming head of the UN body in 1997.
The 2003 invasion of Iraq thrust Mr ElBaradei into the public consciousness. He demurred on the US rationale for attacking Saddam Hussein, describing the war as "a glaring example of how, in many cases, the use of force exacerbates the problem rather than solving it". The award, jointly with the IAEA, of the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize further rankled with the Bush administration.
He has long been urged to challenge the 82-year-old President, but hitherto has bided his time, insisting first on electoral reform, but his participation in today's protests indicate he is ready. Recent speeches, including recently at Harvard, when he joked that he was "looking for a job" have done nothing to dissuade his supporters, but at 68 his presidency would surely be only a short-term fix to Egypt's problems.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



105 Comments so far
Show All¿When will the people of the USA be so brave as to stand up against it`s government like this?
¡Your answer - never!
Forgive me for repeating this.
The people of the US are by and large too isolated from each other, too polarized, too complacent, too self- indulgent, too frightened, too paranoid, too ill-informed and immersed in myth, and too antisocial to collectively rise up against anything or be capable of coherently identifying anything to rise up against. They are incapable of any common or unified social action other than histrionics and cathartic social theater.
well said...my point exactly..they deserve what they get
i get your point. but, not all of us deserve this, nor the rest of the world, including other beings. namaste.
"...The people of the US are by and large too isolated from each other, too polarized, too complacent, too self- indulgent, too frightened, too paranoid, too ill-informed and immersed in myth, and too antisocial to collectively rise up against anything or be capable of coherently identifying anything to rise up against. They are incapable of any common or unified social action other than histrionics and cathartic social theater..."
...Until they do...
When the masses in the US finally DO rise it will be an ugly day to be a person in ANY position of "government authority" whether real or percieved.
The people of the US are a violent, primal people and when finally prodded out of their lethergy they will respond in a very midieval fashion.
I find it interesting that you imagine that if there is some sort of uprising amongst Americans that they will be against 'ANY'person in a position of power. If there is an uprising there is not guarantee what will happen and your ideas for retribution against power as you see it may be nothing more than your individual desire for a uprising to play out in a fashion that satisfies your vision for retribution.
Only those who have never seen such a day of uprising, or cannot any longer envision the actual chaos that could follow, yearn for it as many posters here seem to be. This neat and clean uprising, the low against the high, is a fools dream, and the final natural consequence of a humanity long surpressed finally blowing out of bondage is anything but neat and clean with clear distinctions between innocent and guilty. Those kinds of age old biblical misinterpretations are all part of the problem we face today, not part of the solution.
Unless you have strong social ties of community with those around you, you are just as likely as the next person to be trampled by the unleashed masses gone astray. Ask yourself how strong your ties are with the people all around you and ask yourself if you will be seen as friend or foe in the event everything goes to hell as you envision.
You forgot 'the most brainwashed people' on the face of the earth today...
"may you live in interesting times"
We will have to put down the Playstation, get off Facebook, turn off the TV, and look at what is going on around us. Until that happens, we Americans will not see any improvements in our lives.
Too many have smoked "the American Dream".
And too many people under 20 -- or in their 20s -- are busy playing computer games or hooked up to their Ipods. The incredible brainwashing of America has been brilliant. We also have severe drug -- legal and illegal -- epidemics all over the this country that either keeps them stoned or eventually in prison.
This is just in addition to what you said from the point of view of a lifelong Long Islander, where everything you mentioned, plus the drug epidemic, is alive and well.
Samalabear
Susan Jacoby goes into much detail on this and other reasons why the dumbing down of America has taken place over the last forty years or so in her very relevant and well written book:
The Age of American Unreason.
Ms. Jacoby's book would be a nice addition to Anti-Intellectualism in American Life by Richard Hofstadter which was written back in the early 1960s but is still for the most part quite pertinent regarding the anti-intellectual times that we are faced with today.
And then of course if we do have any effective militancy at a demonstration, as they are showing in Egypt, the handwringers on the left will say, "oh no, not violence! we must be peaceful!"
the answer is not never
might happen sooner than you think
for those not familiar with the concept of the 100th monkey - it is the notion that as soon as enough people know something - then everyone knows it
the awakening that brezinski was fretting about in the nytimes a few months ago has started to materialize
amerika's judas's all through the region are shitting their pants - their 30 sheckels for the betrayal of their countries may be looking a little thin
not surprising to see fascist amerika still supporting their 82 year old, senile boy in egypt. what about abbas in palestine, the king of jordan, maliki or karzai in iraq among many others including saudi arabia
all these regimes are poised to fall and there is nothing the fascist amerikans can do to stop it
amerika has sewn the seeds of hate and depair and now the chickens are coming home to roost
all of these tyrants may have to stand for judgement in front of their people soon
as leonard cohen says:
"there's a mighty judgement comin
but i don't know when"
Oaxaca,
After they are finished with their shopping.
Which won't be long, considering many Americans can't afford to shop anyway... So, as they watch vicariously on their TV sets, life passes them by...
Good one, that.
I would respectfully submit that an unprecedented dynamic is at play in the US despite the parallels:
"Mubarak's men seem to have lost all sense of initiative. Their party newspapers are filled with self-delusion, pushing the massive demonstrations to the foot of front pages as if this will keep the crowds from the streets – as if, indeed, by belittling the story, the demonstrations never happened."
"But you don't need to read the papers to see what has gone wrong. The filth and the slums, the open sewers and the corruption of every government official, the bulging prisons, the laughable elections, the whole vast, sclerotic edifice of power has at last brought Egyptians on to their streets."
Unlike any other time in history, despite that fact that a slim majority remains in denial of the cost of the system to the planet, the need to envision an alternative to constant expansion (and what that means psycho-socially) and systemic unsustainability, we are are being held as human shields (think Koch brothers funding Tea Party) with the rhetorical salves of freedom of speech, while extractive industry green-washes its pathological irresponsibility and voracious usury via externalized costs, and abuses of the body politic and the social contract via an economics of scarcity (eg: usurpation via intellectual and other excessive patent rights to the exclusion of the commons).
Extractive corporatism, where not already openly fascist, is a virtual religion - a monotheism where you are nothing and without voice if not aligned and climbing up the corporate deity. It is truly narcissistic, delusional, reparable and intensely in need of change.
The superficial separation of the symbols of church and state are belied by the existing dynamics.
Good post, goat.
Good? In a way, I guess. It was good at reminding me of this:
"If a new spirit is to be infused into this old country, there is one thorny and contentious reform which must be tackled, and that is the humanization and galvanization of the B.B.C. Timidity here will bespeak canker and atrophy of the soul. The heart of Britain may be sound and of strong beat, for instance, but the British lion's roar at present is like that of Bottom in Shakespeare's Midsummer Night's Dream -- as gentle as any sucking dove. A virile new Britain cannot continue indefinitely to be traduced in the eyes or rather ears, of the world by the effete languors of Langham Place, brazenly masquerading as 'standard English.' When the Voice of Britain is heard at nine o'clock, better far and infinitely less ludicrous to hear aitches honestly dropped than the present priggish, inflated, inhibited, school-ma'amish arch braying of blameless bashful mewing maidens!"
In both, there is a blizzard of familiar phrases and expressions thrown together in rapid sequence that defies analysis because there's nothing specific to analyse. As Orwell said, "People who write in this manner usually have a general emotional meaning -- they dislike one thing and want to express solidarity with another -- but they are not interested in the detail of what they are saying."
Good point Kaplan. I have problems with goat's interminable parade of vocabulary but vacuity of substance or focus. Yet every time goat writes this pompous, rather medieval and quite incoherent prose, someone encourages him/her with a compliment.
The British colonialists in India invented a term for such writing, which became typical of lower level officials of Indian origin in the Raj,and among the toadies:
Babu English
Stick it, you guys. There is nothing wrong with old goat's writing. I think you simply have trouble with complex sentences. I defy you to show me where goat's prose is 'incoherent.' If you want simple subject-verb-object composition, then go read the New York Times.
ReasonisReligion: I often wonder about some of the bloggers here on CD, like yourself.
What is it that drives you to criticize people like 'Old Goat'?
Consider this: We think, therefore we are stupid! Step back and look for ways to improve peoples mind set toward a more emphatic world.
Beware of the Baboon in you to Brother. Babu Babu.
I will put it into shorter sentences for you:
Things suck in Egypt and the people there are fed up.
Conditions in Egypt have some parallels to those here. But something profound and different is happening here. We are in uncharted waters.
Events have forced us into re-considering the true costs of Capitalism. It is destroying everything.
The capitalists are beating the shit out of us, and their tricks to keep us complacent are not going to work forever.
We must think about alternatives.
The rationales and excuses for Capitalism have become a religious creed for us.
"Capitalism [has] become a religious creed for us"
with lawyers as priests.
I think it is possible that democracy will come to the USA. Change sometimes occurs in the unseen. I was struck by what was said of the Tunisian public and the Egyptian public that they had lost their fear. This despite a system of repression that sought to maintain the fear. The US public too is kept in fear - fear of terrorists, of losing their jobs they depend upon to earn an income to support their lives, or fear of foreigners coming to take their jobs. The US public as a collective has not yet connected the dots between the distress in their lives and the cause, a system that does not serve them. But that, and change, can occur.
I can remember, with sadness, the day that Anwar Sadat was assassinated. He was a survivor of =solitary confinement= during imprisonment by the British. Sadat had an exuberant personality and was charming in all his relationships with world leaders. He had genuine warmth, and made Jimmy Carter and Billy Graham laugh. IMO, compared to Anwar Sadat, Mubarak was like a loaf of bread.
Trylon
Sadat was a spy for the Nazis during WWII and publicly declared his admiration for Hitler's personality in the early 50s. But, like the (latently) anti-Semitic pastor "friends of Israel", unpleasant details—even fervent admiration for der Fuhrer—will be swept under the carpet if one learns to play ball with the geopolitical interests of Israel.
http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/militant-islam-and-the-extreme-right
Word salad.
Great expression!
Sadat was a compliant US puppet scumbag and torturer of his own people.
I hope he suffered horribly when he was assasinated.
Exactly.
Don't let those comical old Garret Morris impersonations of Anwar Sadat (with Dan Akroyd as Jimmy Carter) on Saturday Night Live decieve you as to the kind of dictator Sadat was. No doubt Nasser before him too.
Condidering that the average CD reader is probably least 55 years old, I'm sure everyone here remembers those skits.
I recall multiple rifles on automatic fire, so I think your sick hopes are dashed.
But cheer up, there are lots of other US puppet scumbags upon which to pin your hopes. Kermit the Torturing Frog?
This a profound and amazing time; we can't really see where it's going, but we can clearly see where it's been, and that is country after country who populations have had to endure authoritarian governments who were doing the bidding of the West. Beginning as anti Communist in their justification, and now more the economics of the Empire, and the fear, real or imagined, of fundamentalist terror, it is the repression brought by authoritarian allies of the US on their own people that people are reacting to. Wikileaks has added to this paradigm shift, but really it more has sped up a process bound to occur; the people saying Basta! Enough!
'
Pay close attention, Juan Cole's "Informed Comment" blog on the Middle East should be required reading these days.
I cannot see one reason why Mubarak should survive. Nor should the Egyptian people heed the EU or US suggestions as to how to proceed in their own country.
But getting rid of Mubarak will not magically solve "The filth and the slums, the open sewers and the corruption of every government official, the bulging prisons, the laughable elections" (borrowed that goat)
Will they go the way of the US revolution or the French? The War of the Roses or the October revolution. The usual result has been a more repressive regime.
Pray for our Egyptian friends and the others in other countries that want to change leadership and cannot do it peacefully as we can.
"War of the Roses?"
Hardly a popular revolution; a dynastic civil war between the Lancasters and Yorks which ended with the victory of Henry Tudor.
Different "leaders", same policies. The "peaceful transfer of power" without any transfer. Yeah, we're great. Pity those poor schmucks in less-great countries.
Vote? It's either the Replug or Dem. same piece of shit!
As I watch live on Aljarzeera he won't survive.
What we have here is what I'd like to refer to as the beginning of "Reverse Domino Theory."
As a student of Cold War history, Domino Theory was the idea that if one country (Korea/Vietnam) falls to the Soviets, then the entire region may go with it. This was most obvious in Southeast Asain (Indochina), the Korean Peninsula, South America and Africa. Over the course of 40 years, the USA and Soviets fought to gain influence in these regions, mostly by proping up dictators who would serve the interest of their overlords.
For the USA, the idea was to fund a political party with military backing to take control of the "democratic" government, and establish a country that was "business friendly" to the USA. Now, as we all know, business friendly means the US can get away with just about anything in a given country b/c of the loose regulations and laws. This usually meant easy extraction of natural resources and manual labor for international industries.
As we all know, Communism was the idea of nationalizing the resources of a country for the benefit of people as a whole. This was a threat to Capitalism because it meant the closing down of foreign markets, and Capitalism cannont survive without foreign markets.
Now with current senario we have a country in Egypt that is a strong Ally to the west, as we have been funding their military for years. If the people can destabilize their country and it falls it will begin a chain reaction across the entire region.
Already Tunisia has fallen, Lebenon as well. If the Egyptians can overthrow Mubarak, it will begin the Reverse Domino Theory. Saudi Arabia will certainly be next, and this would be the worst case senario for the USA. In essence, the people are reclaiming their countries and insodoing, the right to the use of the commons. Meaning, they want the resources of their country to enrich THEMSELVES instead of the USA. If this plays out as it is, the US could literally watch as its empire falls flat on its face.
People all over the world will soon see that it is possible to stand up to the US, and will start reclaiming the resources of their land for the betterment of the people. In Vietnam, we tried to stop this from happening. But something this big can't be stopped. In the past 10 years South American countries are freeing themselves from western debt, and exchanging their reserve currenies from US dollars to Euros, gold, and other assests. The reason that Iran is the threat it is to the US and Israel is simply because they are NOT in debt to the western banks, and they hold around %25 of their reserves in US dollars; whereas China is somewhere around 80%.
To those of you who say, "why can't this happen in America?" and "Why don't Americans have this kind of courage?" Well its because things are still good enough here, but as Reverse Domino Theory plays itself out, we'll soon find everything that we've done to others for the past half century come back to haunt us. You foreigners don't have to worry about change coming to the USA, it's part of the Karmic Cycle and its return is inevitable.
"...To those of you who say, "why can't this happen in America?" and "Why don't Americans have this kind of courage?" Well its because things are still good enough here, but as Reverse Domino Theory plays itself out, we'll soon find everything that we've done to others for the past half century come back to haunt us. You foreigners don't have to worry about change coming to the USA, it's part of the Karmic Cycle and its return is inevitable..."
AMEN!
AMEN! AMEN! AMEN!
Can't say it enough.
I've been telling folks for a while to spend some time on Google Earth and find a village/town/city in Latin America about the size of the one they live in now. Learn about it in detail... There's your future.
The US will be a third world nation with all the attendant "problems" in just a short time and those not prepared for it will suffer in ways they cannot even begin to imagine.
Karma is a bitch. ;o)
Peace...
" As we all know Communism, was the idea of nationalizing the resources of a country for the benefit of people as a whole". Any ism that is a perceived threat to the politically powerful and elite American wealth and its Empire is always demonized as it terrifies the people that really control Obama, Congress and America. That is why Iraq was attacked with shock and awe and Iran and Venezuela are the latest to be demonized by the whore press. The loses these people suffered when Castro kicked them out of his country were in the billions of $. That is really what scares hell out of them, because these evil, corrupt elite worship at the altar of $ and power. I think their greatest fear may be Saudi Arabia, which is one of the most egregious and corrupt regimes in the world; even worse than Egypt! If what the Hindu's believe about mass karma is true, then Tyler is correct: " we will soon find that everything we have done to foreigners ( for the last 100 years and especially the atom bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki)will come back to haunt us ". America is the new Nazi Germany and look what happened to their country during WWII!
Excellent post.
It about time. Thirty years is enough, and installing a defacto royal family by rigging the upcoming "election" for his son to "win" is not what most Egyptians have in mind for life after Mubarak.
Mubarak can shut down the phones and Internet, but it's not going to stop the protesters. They are fed up with this guy and his family and are not going to stop until they get rid of him.
Looks like they just torched the ruling party headquarters. Burn, baby, burn. Such a richly deserved exit for Mubarak.
What concerns me is that Obama and now Hillary keeps repeating the refrain, "Violence is not the answer," which one cannot help but interpret as an implied threat to the people of those nations.
Nevertheless, the governments that are likely to emerge in Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen if the public wins the battle are Iranian-style Islamic theocratic republics because, there as here, secular views are widely disparate while religious values are more or less monolithic.
'Violence is not the answer.'
Tell that to the Iraqis; that should be good for a 'laugh', or maybe a shoe.
"Violence is not the answer," say Obomber and Clinton, reaching for their holsters...
Nonsense.
Say what?
Isn't that chilling?
I am sure you are right. The warnings to the demonstrators that "violence is not the answer" are a precursor to violence being used against the demonstrators, with massive US support.
There is a coordination that belies Fisk's leaderless hypothesis; we just don't know who they are. The way the Muslim Brotherhood intentionally went incognito ought to be a very clear signal to longtime Egypt watchers. It's now Friday evening, and based on what I've read, the protests continue despite a curfew and involvement of the military. A somewhat similar plaint is emanating from Western capitals saying the Egyptian government must listen to its people, yet those people are adamant in saying Mubarak must go, which is essentailly the same as saying the entire government must go. The situation is fluid and far from over.