Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- This Is What Happens When You Rip a Hole in the Safety Net
- So Your Groundwater's Poison and Your Tap Water's On Fire. Not to Worry: Fracking Chemicals Are Trade Secrets You Don't Need To Know About
- An Outpouring of Love and Support for Bradley Manning to Receive the Nobel Peace Prize
- Exxon Tar Sands Spill Continues to Devastate Arkansas Community
- Exxon's Unfriendly Skies: Why Does Exxon Control the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill?
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Organic Elite Surrenders to Monsanto
"The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well. True coexistence is a must." -- Whole Foods Market, Jan. 21, 2011
In the wake of a 12-year battle to keep Monsanto's Genetically Engineered (GE) crops from contaminating the nation's 25,000 organic farms and ranches, America's organic consumers and producers are facing betrayal. A self-appointed cabal of the Organic Elite, spearheaded by Whole Foods Market, Organic Valley, and Stonyfield Farm, has decided it's time to surrender to Monsanto. Top executives from these companies have publicly admitted that they no longer oppose the mass commercialization of GE crops, such as Monsanto's controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa, and are prepared to sit down and cut a deal for "coexistence" with Monsanto and USDA biotech cheerleader Tom Vilsack.
In a cleverly worded, but profoundly misleading email sent to its customers last week, Whole Foods Market, while proclaiming their support for organics and "seed purity," gave the green light to USDA bureaucrats to approve the "conditional deregulation" of Monsanto's genetically engineered, herbicide-resistant alfalfa. Beyond the regulatory euphemism of "conditional deregulation," this means that WFM and their colleagues are willing to go along with the massive planting of a chemical and energy-intensive GE perennial crop, alfalfa; guaranteed to spread its mutant genes and seeds across the nation; guaranteed to contaminate the alfalfa fed to organic animals; guaranteed to lead to massive poisoning of farm workers and destruction of the essential soil food web by the toxic herbicide, Roundup; and guaranteed to produce Roundup-resistant superweeds that will require even more deadly herbicides such as 2,4 D to be sprayed on millions of acres of alfalfa across the U.S.
In exchange for allowing Monsanto's premeditated pollution of the alfalfa gene pool, WFM wants "compensation." In exchange for a new assault on farmworkers and rural communities (a recent large-scale Swedish study found that spraying Roundup doubles farm workers' and rural residents' risk of getting cancer), WFM expects the pro-biotech USDA to begin to regulate rather than cheerlead for Monsanto. In payment for a new broad spectrum attack on the soil's crucial ability to provide nutrition for food crops and to sequester dangerous greenhouse gases (recent studies show that Roundup devastates essential soil microorganisms that provide plant nutrition and sequester climate-destabilizing greenhouse gases), WFM wants the Biotech Bully of St. Louis to agree to pay "compensation" (i.e. hush money) to farmers "for any losses related to the contamination of his crop."
In its email of Jan. 21, 2011 WFM
calls for "public oversight by the USDA rather than reliance on the
biotechnology industry," even though WFM knows full well that federal
regulations on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) do not require
pre-market safety testing, nor labeling; and that even federal judges
have repeatedly ruled that so-called government "oversight" of
Frankencrops such as Monsanto's sugar beets and alfalfa is basically a
farce. At the end of its email, WFM admits that its surrender to
Monsanto is permanent: "The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely
guide policies for other GE crops as well True coexistence is a must."
Why Is Organic Inc. Surrendering?
According to informed sources, the CEOs of WFM and Stonyfield are personal friends of former Iowa governor, now USDA Secretary, Tom Vilsack, and in fact made financial contributions to Vilsack's previous electoral campaigns. Vilsack was hailed as "Governor of the Year" in 2001 by the Biotechnology Industry Organization, and traveled in a Monsanto corporate jet on the campaign trail. Perhaps even more fundamental to Organic Inc.'s abject surrender is the fact that the organic elite has become more and more isolated from the concerns and passions of organic consumers and locavores. The Organic Inc. CEOs are tired of activist pressure, boycotts, and petitions. Several of them have told me this to my face. They apparently believe that the battle against GMOs has been lost, and that it's time to reach for the consolation prize. The consolation prize they seek is a so-called "coexistence" between the biotech Behemoth and the organic community that will lull the public to sleep and greenwash the unpleasant fact that Monsanto's unlabeled and unregulated genetically engineered crops are now spreading their toxic genes on 1/3 of U.S. (and 1/10 of global) crop land.
WFM and most of the largest organic companies have deliberately separated themselves from anti-GMO efforts and cut off all funding to campaigns working to label or ban GMOs. The so-called Non-GMO Project, funded by Whole Foods and giant wholesaler United Natural Foods (UNFI) is basically a greenwashing effort (although the 100% organic companies involved in this project seem to be operating in good faith) to show that certified organic foods are basically free from GMOs (we already know this since GMOs are banned in organic production), while failing to focus on so-called "natural" foods, which constitute most of WFM and UNFI's sales and are routinely contaminated with GMOs.
From their "business as usual" perspective, successful lawsuits against GMOs filed by public interest groups such as the Center for Food Safety; or noisy attacks on Monsanto by groups like the Organic Consumers Association, create bad publicity, rattle their big customers such as Wal-Mart, Target, Kroger, Costco, Supervalu, Publix and Safeway; and remind consumers that organic crops and foods such as corn, soybeans, and canola are slowly but surely becoming contaminated by Monsanto's GMOs.
Whole Food's Dirty Little Secret: Most of the So-Called "Natural" Processed Foods and Animal Products They Sell Are Contaminated with GMOs
The main reason, however, why Whole Foods is pleading for coexistence with Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, Syngenta, BASF and the rest of the biotech bullies, is that they desperately want the controversy surrounding genetically engineered foods and crops to go away. Why? Because they know, just as we do, that 2/3 of WFM's $9 billion annual sales is derived from so-called "natural" processed foods and animal products that are contaminated with GMOs. We and our allies have tested their so-called "natural" products (no doubt WFM's lab has too) containing non-organic corn and soy, and guess what: they're all contaminated with GMOs, in contrast to their certified organic products, which are basically free of GMOs, or else contain barely detectable trace amounts.
Approximately 2/3 of the products sold by Whole Foods Market and their main distributor, United Natural Foods (UNFI) are not certified organic, but rather are conventional (chemical-intensive and GMO-tainted) foods and products disguised as "natural."
Unprecedented wholesale and retail control of the organic marketplace by UNFI and Whole Foods, employing a business model of selling twice as much so-called "natural" food as certified organic food, coupled with the takeover of many organic companies by multinational food corporations such as Dean Foods, threatens the growth of the organic movement.
Covering Up GMO Contamination: Perpetrating "Natural" Fraud
Many well-meaning consumers are confused about the difference between conventional products marketed as "natural," and those nutritionally/environmentally superior and climate-friendly products that are "certified organic."
Retail stores like WFM and wholesale distributors like UNFI have failed to educate their customers about the qualitative difference between natural and certified organic, conveniently glossing over the fact that nearly all of the processed "natural" foods and products they sell contain GMOs, or else come from a "natural" supply chain where animals are force-fed GMO grains in factory farms or Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs).
A troubling trend in organics today is the calculated shift on the part of certain large formerly organic brands from certified organic ingredients and products to so-called "natural" ingredients. With the exception of the "grass-fed and grass-finished" meat sector, most "natural" meat, dairy, and eggs are coming from animals reared on GMO grains and drugs, and confined, entirely, or for a good portion of their lives, in CAFOs.
Whole Foods and UNFI are maximizing their profits by selling quasi-natural products at premium organic prices. Organic consumers are increasingly left without certified organic choices while genuine organic farmers and ranchers continue to lose market share to "natural" imposters. It's no wonder that less than 1% of American farmland is certified organic, while well-intentioned but misled consumers have boosted organic and "natural" purchases to $80 billion annually-approximately 12% of all grocery store sales.
The Solution: Truth-in-Labeling Will Enable Consumers to Drive So-Called "Natural" GMO and CAFO-Tainted Foods Off the Market
There can be no such thing as "coexistence" with a reckless industry that undermines public health, destroys biodiversity, damages the environment, tortures and poisons animals, destabilizes the climate, and economically devastates the world's 1.5 billion seed-saving small farmers. There is no such thing as coexistence between GMOs and organics in the European Union. Why? Because in the EU there are almost no GMO crops under cultivation, nor GM consumer food products on supermarket shelves. And why is this? Because under EU law, all foods containing GMOs or GMO ingredients must be labeled. Consumers have the freedom to choose or not to choose GMOs; while farmers, food processors, and retailers have (at least legally) the right to lace foods with GMOs, as long as they are safety-tested and labeled. Of course the EU food industry understands that consumers, for the most part, do not want to purchase or consume GE foods. European farmers and food companies, even junk food purveyors like McDonald's and Wal-Mart, understand quite well the concept expressed by a Monsanto executive when GMOs first came on the market: "If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it."
The biotech industry and Organic Inc. are supremely conscious of the fact that North American consumers, like their European counterparts, are wary and suspicious of GMO foods. Even without a PhD, consumers understand you don't want your food safety or environmental sustainability decisions to be made by out-of-control chemical companies like Monsanto, Dow, or Dupont - the same people who brought you toxic pesticides, Agent Orange, PCBs, and now global warming. Industry leaders are acutely aware of the fact that every single industry or government poll over the last 16 years has shown that 85-95% of American consumers want mandatory labels on GMO foods. Why? So that we can avoid buying them. GMO foods have absolutely no benefits for consumers or the environment, only hazards. This is why Monsanto and their friends in the Bush, Clinton, and Obama administrations have prevented consumer GMO truth-in-labeling laws from getting a public discussion in Congress.
Although Congressman Dennis Kucinich (Democrat, Ohio) recently introduced a bill in Congress calling for mandatory labeling and safety testing for GMOs, don't hold your breath for Congress to take a stand for truth-in-labeling and consumers' right to know what's in their food. Especially since the 2010 Supreme Court decision in the so-called "Citizens United" case gave big corporations and billionaires the right to spend unlimited amounts of money (and remain anonymous, as they do so) to buy media coverage and elections, our chances of passing federal GMO labeling laws against the wishes of Monsanto and Food Inc. are all but non-existent. Perfectly dramatizing the "Revolving Door" between Monsanto and the Federal Government, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, formerly chief counsel for Monsanto, delivered one of the decisive votes in the Citizens United case, in effect giving Monsanto and other biotech bullies the right to buy the votes it needs in the U.S. Congress.
With big money controlling Congress and the media, we have little choice but to shift our focus and go local. We've got to concentrate our forces where our leverage and power lie, in the marketplace, at the retail level; pressuring retail food stores to voluntarily label their products; while on the legislative front we must organize a broad coalition to pass mandatory GMO (and CAFO) labeling laws, at the city, county, and state levels.
The Organic Consumers Association, joined by our consumer, farmer, environmental, and labor allies, has just launched a nationwide Truth-in-Labeling campaign to stop Monsanto and the Biotech Bullies from force-feeding unlabeled GMOs to animals and humans.
Utilizing scientific data, legal precedent, and consumer power the OCA and our local coalitions will educate and mobilize at the grassroots level to pressure giant supermarket chains (Wal-Mart, Kroger, Costco, Safeway, Supervalu, and Publix) and natural food retailers such as Whole Foods and Trader Joe's to voluntarily implement "truth-in-labeling" practices for GMOs and CAFO products; while simultaneously organizing a critical mass to pass mandatory local and state truth-in-labeling ordinances - similar to labeling laws already in effect for country of origin, irradiated food, allergens, and carcinogens. If local and state government bodies refuse to take action, wherever possible we must attempt to gather sufficient petition signatures and place these truth-in-labeling initiatives directly on the ballot in 2011 or 2012. If you're interesting in helping organize or coordinate a Millions Against Monsanto and Factory Farms Truth-in-Labeling campaign in your local community, sign up here: http://organicconsumers.org/oca-volunteer/
To pressure Whole Foods Market and the nation's largest supermarket chains to voluntarily adopt truth-in-labeling practices sign here, and circulate this petition widely: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22309.cfm
And please stay tuned to Organic Bytes for the latest developments in our campaigns.
Power to the People! Not the Corporations!
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

118 Comments so far
Show AllI won't eat GE alfalfa or anything that might.
The entire problem is that you will not know you are eating it unless a labeling law takes effect. Before the existing labeling law we did not know if we were eating high fructose corn syrup or organic honey, actual food or chemical 'naturals' made in a factory in New Jersey.
"What is carefully kept out of the Monsanto and other agribusiness propaganda in promoting genetically manipulated crops as an alternative to conventional is the fact that in the entire world until the present, all GMO crops have been manipulated and patented for only two things―to be resistant or “tolerant” to the patented highly toxic herbicide glyphosate chemicals that Monsanto and the others force farmers to buy as condition for buying their patented GMO seeds. The second trait is GMO seeds that have been engineered genetically to resist specific insects. Contrary to public relations myths promoted by the agribusiness giants in their own self-interest, there exists not oné single GMO seed that provides a greater harvest yield than conventional, nor one that requires less toxic chemical herbicides. That is for the simple reason there is no profit to be made in such."
f w engdahl
http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/GMO/GMO_Crop/gmo_crop.html
"there exists not oné single GMO seed that provides a greater harvest yield than conventional"
In the interests of fairness, your statement is only partly true.
Though the genetic modifications do not necessarily create seeds of greater yield per se, the techniques that eliminate field competition do translate into significant production gains---at least in the short term.
We must be careful how we frame our opposing arguments.
The substantive issue is really about long term costs related to environment degradation, species loss, etc. Weighed against that, it seems the immediate gains realized, yield an eventual deficit. Unfortunately for us, the corporate and transnational entities that control our food supply are only concerned with the balance sheet as it appears today.
There is another factor. Improved varieties from the (publicly financed) land grant ag colleges using traditional breeding methods are then genetically engineered by private firms for the sole purpose of inserting "marker" genes into the crop that do not have any effect on crop or plant quality. This allows them to "own" it, and to then claim the benefits of the improved variety as their "intellectual property rights" and market improvements that were actually not done with GMO. I read an article this past spring about a groundswell of opposition to this forming among corn farmers, and many are going back to the "open source" hybrids.
This is not exactly true.
- Monsanto's patent on glyphosate herbicides has long since expired
- Glyphosate is biodegradable and relatively safe.
- No one is forced to buy it, that I have ever heard about - can't imagine how that would even be done.
- There are cultivators with increased yields being developed all of the time, and some have then been hijacked by bio-tech firms and claimed as private property. So to say that "no GMO crops have higher yields" is simply not accurate. Claims of higher yields as a result of genetic engineering are suspect.
- The main purpose of GMO crops is neither for resistance to pests nor chemicals. The purpose is to privatize and control new varieties.
Misinformation and half-truths sabotage the battle against GMO and corporate control over our food supply.
You can be sure that the food labels will not identify GM products, so we will not know what to buy and avoid based on that criterion. Eventually, it will not matter because everything will be a GM product.
Label the Betrayers.
For this betrayal all concerned folks could initiate their own labeling program on the offenders.
It's easy to make your own labels these days for said corporate organic products.
Simple slogans posted on their products could cost them millions.
A few examples:
Stoneyfield has Betrayed Organic Farmers.
Organic Valley Supports GMO-Monsanto.
Holy Foods is Sleeping with Monsanto.
etc.
Wheatpasted paper flyers near every hole food markets would suffice too if one doesn't want to frequent inside.
Boycotts with consumer education posted on every betrayers product or wfm will make them take notice.
Either Monsanto, DuPont and Cargill will survive or the biosphere will. We can't have both.
This is an emergency. We must grow our own food and save our seeds. But even more important we need to stop Monsanto and the others of face starvation.
www.foodnotbombs.net
Great suggestion! ...and will check out your site.
And I most definitely agree that for the U.S & our planet to survive, these global merchants of suffering & death must be stopped. No doubt Monsanto and the rest of these totalitarian multi-nationals will see to it that our criminal cabal of lobbyists in Congress and gov’t agencies will make it illegal to grow our own food or save seeds citing interference with their right to make profits. And will subject violators to draconian fines to compensate for their financial loss. It’s been done.
It is all too painfully clear that our democratic gov't is a sham – as our supposed representatives repeatedly pass legislation that favors the greed of powerful vested interests over the rest of us. These global multi-nationals that serve the interests of the top 2% at the sacrifice of the remaining 98% of humanity must be dismantled if “we-the-people” are ever to re-gain any control over their corrosively corrupting influence.
We need to work with the surviving small family growers and the people in the public agriculture infrastructure. No gardens or lifestyle changes can stop the juggernaut.
Eventually, there will be special sections for those supermarket shoppers with heads growing out of their hips or armpits. What noise and confusion this is going to cause.
Trylon
Grow your own
Can or freeze
Find local as organic as can be farmers
Hope for the best
Yet one more reason not to shop at Whole Paycheck.
Is there anyplace left in the world where corn [maize] is not contaminated with GMO genes? The last I heard, the stuff was spreading in Mexico, which is the genetic repository of maize, where it grew aboriginally, and where the local farmers cultivated it. I used to be able to buy organic corn tortillas from my co op but they can no longer carry them, since all corn tortillas available in the USA are GMO corn based or contaminated.
Boycott all stores and products which participate in this process. Our dollars are our only weapon. Our votes are worthless on a national scale. Can we effectively change local laws, or will the feds simply override them? Can we follow the examples set by our brothers and sisters in Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen?
I'm guessing NOT. Read a report about two years ago where Monsanto "bribed" the Argentinian gov. to allow GE corn to be grown, even they also had laws against it.
This is how Capitalism works in every country with every product from every corporation. That is what the US military, the IMF and the WTO are doing - enforcing corporate will around the world.
why would anyone be surprised that the organic movement has been completely compromised and crushed, and that US corporate interests are being forced on people in other countries? What did people imagine was happening? What did people think the outcome would be? Did they really believe that if we just kept "speaking truth to power" or if we changed our lifestyles, or of we would just "be the change we want to see," or if we "worked to get progressive candidates elected," or signed petitions or emailed politicians, or voted third party that any of that would stop what is happening?
Time to wake up. The rest of the world is.
Now, while progressives here look for nice and gentle ways to fix things, or individualistic changes to their lifestyle, or shopping habits, or "beliefs," the people in the rest of the world are starting to seriously fight back against the US Capitalist juggernaut, the empire, while most progressives here have only the vaguest concept of what is happening. They are just shocked!!! that organic has not worked out. How naive and self-absorbed could we be?
No, the "cop on the beat" is not "your friend," so to speak. This is the truth that progressives need to face - people so steeped on the fantasy about the American dream that they don't even know they are, people living in some suburban nicey-nice fantasy land. No, the system cannot be made to work. No, the rulers - the corporations and the politicians they own - are never going to "do the right thing."
TA, I've read the multiple postings you've put onto this tread and suspect thay you are IN the business - but I could be wrong.
What you, and many others who accept the inevitablity of GM crops really need to understand is:
1. The unintended cross pollination of GM genes with native species can eventually lead to the demise of life on earth, not further it. Yes, this is a far extreme position, but within the range of possibility. Already the cross pollination with some weeds have made it manditory to use MORE, not less herbicide on the ground. This has a cascading effect on a chemical level, and possibly on a genetic level. Cotton genes have cross pollinated with pigweed, but what will pigweed cross pollenate with? Will that weed effect others that will eventually taint the sweet potato(?), peanuts (?) peaches or citrus?
2. GM is NOT ABOUT IMPROVING CROP QUALITY OR QUANTITY! The companies partaking of genetic research are doing so for PROFIT and CONTROL. Control of the food supply. If a company can patent seed, no person can plant or legally save seed without paying for the priviledge. HOW MUCH PROFIT WILL BE "ENOUGH"?
3. I'd argued for a long time that GM crops should only have been grown under greenhouse conditions with negative atmospheres.
Though I don't question that many politicans have good intentions, those making the money do not. I will admit that there is a lot of 'emotion' in the debate, and often that blinds people to alternatives. The real problem is that the 'regulatory' agencies believe that it is their responsibility to protedt industry, and not the people. The government does virtually no independant research in this field, but relies on the industries own studies, which are questionable at BEST. just one opinion.
In a few months Whole Paycheck is set to invade my fair city with its first store. I fear for the future of the few mom and pop natural grocery stores that we are fortuante to have. The "progressive" crowd will flock to the newest chain in town, just like they did when Trader Joe's opened. This just further reinforces why I won't shop there and will spread this story around to my friends. The organic brand is getting more and more watered down.
As of right now, the organic brand is strong! Watchdog groups like Cornucopia Institute do independent testing of USDA certified organic foods (you can compare brands using the "scorecards" at http://www.cornucopia.org/)
It's "natural" products that contain GMO ingredients. However, either Truth-in-Labeling must be implemented, or courts must stop USDA's Vilsack and Monsanto. If not, eventually GM alfalfa will contaminate all alfalfa crops including the alfalfa which is fed to organic dairy cows.
The organic brand is mostly being slapped on imported foods that have little or no inspection, regulation or certification. A premium price is being charged for inferior food.
Defending the brand is defending corporate avarice and less safe food. It should not be that way, but it is.
I am working right now with the largest organic cherry grower. He can't sell the product. Why? because the buyers, the packers and the corporations don't want organic food, they want cheap food that they can label organic and get away with it, and that means importing it from China. It is all a scam, yet people are emotionally attached to the word "organic" and are defending the brand - and a brand name is all that organic means anymore in the real world as opposed to people's imaginations - that stands for inferior and more dangerous food, more environmental destruction, and more corporate profits - all at the expense of crushing the small farmers here and placing the public at great risk.
We are thinking about putting together a way to sell those organic cherries directly to the public by mail order and through the Internet, and using that as an opportunity for exposing the utter scam and rip off that the organic industry has become.
Few activists give a crap about anything like that - actually getting food; and the truth - to people. They are too busy emoting and taking self-righteous postures and playing out some good versus evil melodrama.
WTF did people think was going to happen when they tried to change food policy through the mechanism of entrepreneurship and consumer choice? when they turned it into a cause that bears more resemblance to religious zealotry then it dos to any intelligent analysis or study? Of course the corporations would move right in and screw everyone. We do live in America. But I guess a lot of the activists still harbor some sort of Mom and Pop America the land of opportunity fantasies.
You want your choice, to select a nicely packaged food item labeled "organic" and you ant to convince everyone else to do that? Well, the corporations found a way to make your dream cone true, and it is a nightmare. It has done serious damage to any serious efforts at making food safer or farming more sustainable. But the organic zealots will say "no, no we really care and we are for safer food and sustainable farming!" But your efforts are having the opposite effect. "But we are the good people who care and who want safer food and more sustainable farming!" It is like trying to talk to fundamentalists about evolution.
Whenever you get to the actual point of selling organic over the Internet, let us know. We're interested.
Thanks. We are not happy about the approved organic methods - the use of various "natural" poisons in massive amounts, 5 times more spraying than so-called "conventional," the use of heavy metals, the irresponsible failure to deal with serious diseases such as potato blight - and have serious concerns about the safety of organic food. We won't sell food that is unsafe, environmental destructive, or that misleads the public.
The boss told me the other day that there were tons and tons of organic fruit from the one (real) farmer attempting organic, without a home. We found this very interesting. The corporations (and 99.9999% of the food grown and then sold to the public is bought by corporations) are selling millions of tons of stuff labeled "organic," but have zero interest in actually buying true and certified organic. They are importing crap (and you have to really be naive if you think any of that is organic) and then labeling it "organic" (and, by the way, "product of USA" if it is packaged here, no matter where it is grown) and that way they are able to evade any oversight or inspection. (anyone who thinks China is certifying anything, or Mexico, is terminally naive, and anyone who thinks the USDA can inspect even a fraction of the produce and food products pouring in from China is, as well.) Don't people who are so interested in and concerned about food safety and sustainable farming want to know the truth about what is happening? Yet if you try to tell them the truth, they attack you as a "Monsanto chill." It is nuts.
The boss says "we could move those" since we have an extensive mail order and Internet marketing system. I expressed concern - we are growing safer cherries in a more environmentally friendly way here and organic requires a lot of questionable practices that impact the soil negatively (accumulation of "natural" poisons) and food safety. So he says "yeah but we could charge twice as much." I said "ka-ching!" I swear Capitalism corrupts everything.
The person growing them is serious, very progressive, and is a real farmer, so I will talk to him about exactly how they were grown, and if they are as safe as the co-called "conventional" fruit, then I will keep an open mind. I am not comfortable with charging people double, though. It just doesn't seem right. I am also not excited about reinforcing and promoting "organic" as a brand, since in the real world that leads to people selecting food branded "organic" on the supermarket shelf and then paying more for substandard, more dangerous, and less healthy imported food. That doesn't seem right to me.
I notice there is not one fact, sliver of evidence, or link to any statistics, figures or reputable information source in your diatribe. It's all opinion, and it's all bullshit.
Organic food is mostly produced on small, family farms, while most conventional food comes from monoculture, industrial "factory" farms. Even Organic Valley, one of the largest organic producers, is a cooperative with about 1,500 family farmer members. See the movie "Food, Inc." Read the statistics linked to this very OCA article.
Organic farming is absolutely sustainable. That's a big part of it's value.
As for inspections, "USDA Organic" food is subjected to many more inspections than is conventional food. It's conventional food that is dangerous, and all of the tainted beef, eggs, peanut butter, etc. that gets recalled after sickening or killing people is conventional and most often connected to industrial agriculture methods.
As to organic cherries, they are already available, whole, dried, juiced, and as ingredients in other food products. You can't sell them? Maybe that's because they aren't certified USDA Organic. And that means the grower does not want the very inspections you claim don't exist.
Do you have any idea how illogical you response is?
I say that we can not rely on inspection and certification on most of the products the corporations are labeling "organic," and you attack me.
I am quite familiar with what the USDA is doing. Yes, in people's fantasies, in theory, "organic" is somehow subjected to more rigorous inspection
The cherry industry is small, I know all of the growers, I know where all of the fruit goes. I don't know what you are buying, and I am sure you feel good because it has an "organic" label on it, but I can tell you that you are likely being conned. You don't care about that, I guess, so long as you can continue to "believe" and attack anyone who threatens your faith-based fantasy world.
That is right - the corporations dominating the food industry will not buy organic grown here, because that is not what they are interested in. Get it? They can import food cheaply, label it organic, evade all inspection, and turn massive profits. Gullible people - sold on the"consumer choice" model - eagerly line up and fork over their money and pay premium prices.
I would be more than happy to post thousands of "slivers of evidence" to thoroughly support everything I am saying here. I often do that. Then I find that no one is sincerely interested in any of this.
I don't think you rad my post very closely - your emotion on this subject interferes, no doubt. I am talking about certified organic cherries. A lot of them. In the real world. from a real farmer. The corporations are not interested. Are you following me? If you care about organic, you would welcome this information rather than attacking me.
TA- you sound like and insider, but your points indicate you don't have a clue.
I am in the business of buying cert. org. product, including org. cherries and even imported org. products and have done so for close to 20 years (40 years considering "buying organic" before '91 law). I have far more trust, 100% trust in the 4-5 growers of organic cherries that we buy from and are following the rules.
Cert. Organic is the "BEST WE HAVE"! do you get that point?
Ronnie Cummins has caused a real storm here, that will have absolutely no benefit to keeping organic organic.
We need to affect change in consumer habits of what they buy. Buying organic (even if its not a perfect system of guarantee) is by far a better choice to affect the amount of enviro toxicity we all and the planet find ourselves subject too.
Cummins citing Org Valley, Stonyfield and even WFM as part of the problem is so blatantly false its SICK.
These companies have and will continue to fight GMO's. The threat to organic that GMO's represent has always been and clearly will always be very important to my customer and their customers!
If folks really want the low down of the anti-gmo lobbying effort that these companies have tried to fund themselves (vs. Monsanto and other bio tech companies have spent $547million dollars since 1999 lobbying in Washington- They spent $71 million dollars in 2009! THAT IS WHY THE USDA ISN'T REGULATING GM Alfalfa!!!!!!!) please go to the websites of each of these companies and read their reactions to both the decision and Cummins (knife in the dagger of organic community) letter.
We are in BIG trouble!!!
Surrender to MONSATANO?
Has the Maya calender hit 2012 yet? I'm going back to sleep now, and will just wait until the whole place blows up. Shouldn't be too long now.
Let me know when the endless nightmare is over.
.
.
.
So, when will Monsanto be setting up the baby incubation facilities?
Our children will be their next lineup of products.
Is your child Round-Up Ready?®™ yet?
Boycott! Boycott! Boycott!
It's the only direct action we ordinary people can take.
We can no longer look to our government to ensure health and safety ... human, animal, plant, soil, air, water.
There is no such thing as 'coexistence' for organics and GMO's.
Unfortunately, there is no way back once this road is taken. The GMO contamination will become pervasive making it literally impossible for organics to be truly organic.
We should already be boycotting Whole Foods, ever since their CEO Mackey published his anti-public-option for U.S. health care screed in the Wall Street Journal last year. He's also aggressive about squelching unions. What a schmuck.
And don't even get me started about all the self-absorbed "lifestyle" magazines they sell in their checkout lines. Nothing even vaguely political, of course. That would upset the oh-so-trendy, self-absorbed, new age sensibilties of their typical customer.
Support your local food co-op, your farmers market, your backyard garden. But don't support Whole Foods.
Well i really hate to post this.
Here's what i wrote on yesterday's thread on the Will Fantle article:
****************************************
i work at a natural foods co-op grocery.
Our national organization, the National Cooperative Grocers Association (NCGA), has joined Whole Foods and United Natural Foods Incorporated (UNFI, the dominant distributor of "natural foods" in the USA, whose number one sales contract is with Whole Foods and whose number two sales contract is with the NCGA) in "compromise" with the USDA and Monsanto, to achieve what they call "co-existence" with GMO ag following this ruling on GMO alfalfa.
Together, Whole Foods, UNFI, and many of the co-ops are members and chief funders of the "Non-GMO Project" which purports to defend organic and "natural foods" against the encroachment of GMOs.
Now they have sold out for a "seat at the table" as we work out "coexistence" with Monsanto and a GMO-dominated agricultural system.
Fucking puke on compromise and coexistence with such evil. These successful businesses, WF and UNFI and the NCGA have become so successful that they cringe at imagining organizing actual resistance to the takeover of our agricultural system by GMO purveyors, who frankly seek global economic hegemony through the "legal" ownership of the stuff of life.
As we move forward from here, how is my co-op any different from Whole Foods? i will be organizing a letter to the NCGA to inquire, but i do not expect an honest answer.
****************************************
So, i will post again when i get my letter drafted, and when i get a reply from the NCGA. And i will still shop at my co-op over WF, and i will seek to organize our co-op owners to get educated and activated about this.
We just received our promotions packet, poster and buttons, from the Non-GMO project this week. We have shelf-tags from the Non-GMO Project up on our shelves.
Here's the clip from Cummins' article above referencing the Non-GMO Project:
"WFM and most of the largest organic companies have deliberately separated themselves from anti-GMO efforts and cut off all funding to campaigns working to label or ban GMOs. The so-called Non-GMO Project, funded by Whole Foods and giant wholesaler United Natural Foods (UNFI) is basically a greenwashing effort (although the 100% organic companies involved in this project seem to be operating in good faith) to show that certified organic foods are basically free from GMOs (we already know this since GMOs are banned in organic production), while failing to focus on so-called "natural" foods, which constitute most of WFM and UNFI's sales and are routinely contaminated with GMOs."
Our co-op certainly joined the Non-GMO Project "in good faith" as Cummins assumes. Let's see what our co-op does with this latest move from our national association NCGA, working with WF and UNFI, to negotiate with the USDA on compromise and "coexistence" with Monsanto GMOs. i'll keep you posted.
Sign the petition!
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22309.cfm
Send copies to your local grocers!
Yes, I SIGNED this petition, just like dozens similar to it in years past. It just gets so damn frustrating that every year we sign for or five petitions for either truth in labeling, or to deny the release of new GMOs, but the government ignores the people. They even slipped in S510 as an amendment to a different bill after the people had rallied against it. I honestly see very little hope for a bright future for our country.
Please do not make the mistake of thinking that our votes make us the constituency of any legislator. Their constituency is the money which got them thru an election process and into office. Often that includes the people who vetted them first, like any job interview. There is good reason for legislators and government to ignore the desires and demands of the people. They don't care. They don't have to. Big Biz vets them, pays for their ads, and puts the propaganda on the television which convinces 50% of voters to vote for them. There are dozens of issues right now which the majority of Americans want solved, mostly all in the same way. But those solutions detract from the profit margins of big Biz - be it Monsanto, BP, Blackwater, or the arms industry. So the mouthpiece tells the Congressman, the Senator, and the President how they want it done. Thus, signing petitions, writing letters, telephoning, etc., are not very productive. I am definitely open to suggestions for possible courses of action to rectify this growing fascist movement in my country. I am a vet. This is a very different place than the one in which I enlisted 50 yrs ago.
Like you, I too served (1968 - 1972) and find it difficult to recognize our country today. I do grow a good portion of our own food though I've only cleared about three acres for crops and keep the rest of my land in tree growth (50 plus acres). The prices for heritage seeds have gone up drasticly over the past two years or for those that have tried to keep the prices down, the weight has been reduced.
I have no illusions as to which "master" our elected 'representatives' serve. Follow the money was good advice during the Nixon era, and still holds true today. What bothers above all else is the polarization of neighbors over some perceived difference between political parties. Neighbors are neighbors. I register 'republican' but vote my conscience. I don't ask people their party affiliation when I lend a hand getting them out of a snow bank, or clear brush from their yard.
I hope you guys noticed that the petition is being sent to the six largest supermarket chains in the U.S.; not to Congress. Organic Consumer Association is launching a consumer movement. With over 850,000 members, OCA has had some impressive successes with such campaigns in the past. Consumer dollars drive profits, profits drive corporations, and corporations have influence with politicians. That's the strategy. It's a snowball effect, so let's not piss on the snowball before it has a chance to get rolling.
As the article notes, "85-95% of American consumers want mandatory labels on GMO foods. Why? So that we can avoid buying them." Also, "in the EU there are almost no GMO crops under cultivation, nor GM consumer food products on supermarket shelves. And why is this? Because under EU law, all foods containing GMOs or GMO ingredients must be labeled."
It's helpful that Dennis Kucinich has introduced a Truth in Labeling bill, but as you point out, the real work ahead is in mobilizing the public, not the politicians.
How hard would it be to copy and print the petition, sign it, and send it to the grocery stores where you shop. (That's what I'm doing.) Post it on other blogs, and on real-world bulletin boards. Email it to friends. With an 85-95% majority, we can win this one.
Consumer choice as a model for political action is weak and ineffective. The corporations will always co-opt any such attempts.
Fighting for "choice" means that while some will then have the "choice" to eat the safe and healthy food, others will not. If anything is proved to be unsafe and unhealthy, it should not be sold to anyone. If anything is shown to be safer and more healthy, it should be equally available to all. That requires public infrastructure, not entrepreneurship, consumer choice, and lifestyle changes.
We have a population that is more divorced from its food supply - and more ignorant about it - then any population ever before in history. That is not a farming problem, it is a problem of suburbanization, and suburbia is all about "better choices" for the clever few - in all things. That is what is unreliable, unsustainable, and destructive to the planet.
The polarization is more than just party affiliation. My partner and I are currently under scrutiny because we have different religious connections than the other tenants on property including the manager, all of whom are Christians. We are literally living in a fish bowl because they fear us though we have done nothing to provoke anyone. I see two major recurring themes, religious domination (see Wall Builders from California) and elitism (financial and otherwise). The other tenants will allow us to help them, but hold a superiority even as they hesitantly interact with us as if we were lepers. We've put up holiday lights, done gardening, cleaned up toxic spills, shared meals, etc. but when it was realized following this past Christmas that our heads were not turned around as desired the entire group distanced themselves. I see it as a belief in separation, the very kind of separation that Jesus bridged. Simply being human is discounted, disregarded. This is why I sense we can get nothing done, and why we have no virility when it comes to social change. We are literally divided by illusions, and conquered by doubts.
I agree, the deviding lines are more than just policitical viewpoints. Too bad everybody couldn't listen to John Trudell at least once, hear the power of his music and the strength of his poetry, to know his story. Many in the "Christian" world seems to have forgotten the message, and worship only the messanger. The same can be said of many of the religions around the world I guess.
We are all more alike than different. I guess with the 'organic' issues, it is more of a factor that man now believes that mankind can use everything today and has no repsonsibility to protect what is here for posterity. I believe we are caretakers, not owners. As such, what we use should be as little as necessary, not as much as possible. just my opinion
"Coexistence" is impossible.
People should recognize this as the war against life that it is.
-30-
re: ""Coexistence" is impossible."
Resistance Is Futile.
Well, some resistance can look that way but not all resistance is futile. Yes, it is sad that this latest move further soils our already damaged health care system. As my uncle would say, "Grow what you can and if possible, do some neighborly gardening". It finally also donned on me that even those of us who live in apartments and condos/townhouses where gardening isn't possible can rent a small patch of land in some places and grow our own food. Yes, a little driving will be required but then again, driving is already a must almost everywhere what with little to no public transportation in most places. I may not do political movements but I still believe that we can try all venues no matter what.
P.S.: We need more discussion on reversing the land grabs and the ruining of small towns in the process that forced more citizens into inner cities and suburban sprawl.
Very refreshing to hear from someone with perspective on this.
"We need more discussion on reversing the land grabs and the ruining of small towns in the process that forced more citizens into inner cities and suburban sprawl."
Absolutely. Herding people off of their farmland, hunting and fishing grounds, and sustainable cooperative communities is an ongoing global assault. This makes the resources available to the corporations and crates a desperate dependent work force in the cities.
Making different consumer choices or starting a garden will not stop that process.
On your last sentence, yes it will not stop that process but it can slow it down some. :)
P.S.: I prefer grassfed milk, raw or pasteurized, over conventional milk even if it has the "organic" label as grassfed milk is naturally organic. Since you are a farmer, I would be interested in getting your thoughts on grass fed milk.
We will have to disagree on that. We can see from this thread that the consumer choice and lifestyle approach - all based on beliefs and limited knowledge and experience - has a strong hold on people's imaginations, and that makes it very difficult to discuss the issue or for anyone to learn anything.
At one time there were 180 dairy operations in this county. There are three now. Farms have been forced to specialize, consolidate and grow bigger. I was in a discussion with farmers about that today. It seems that this pressure results in the worst characters becoming larger and dominating the industry. That is pervasive in Capitalism of course, since the corner-cutters and predators are always rewarded.
I favor returning to decentralized local systems for dairy, eggs, poultry, pork and beef and shutting down the food factories. That is going to take public policy, funding and infrastructure. Personal choice and free markets will never work to effect beneficial social programs and policies.
The debate about the various food choices probably doesn't matter, though, since the whole food system will soon be under the control of a handful of corporations and farming in the US will collapse. We are getting closer and closer to that, and the pace at which things are collapsing is accelerating.
Our foodie obsessions make for a stark contrast with the reality of the growing starvation and destruction of fame land. It strikes me that it is some sort of emotional compensation - rather than face the truth, we embrace the illusions of "personal choice" and obsess over that rather than looking at the big picture. Can;t fault people for that, as we are living in a nightmare, people are very frightened, and they will seek relief and escape from that in fantasies of various kinds.
Yes, grassfed milk is nice. A livable planet and sane society would be even nicer. But I suppose that so long as we are eating well and making the "right choices," at least we will be healthy when the whole world blows up.
You are right that this is about corporate control of farming, but it is also about poisoning us. I don't see how these two are mutually exclusive.
Corn feeding of beef, even for 6 weeks, replaces omega 3 fats with omega 6. This bad ratio is responsible for an epidemic of fatty acid deficiency, producing some unknown percent of heart disease, mental illness and arthritis. I don't see that as a "foodie obsession" but a dramatic difference in health care costs and a personal difference between between health and illness for millions of people. And, it is a consequence of the corporate control of farming. Raising beef naturally to save medical costs as well as grief beats destroying fish to get fish oil for everyone. I don't think you will be able to have a revolution if everyone is sick.
When you say personal choice and free markets will never work, I'd suggest that, actually, they were working so well that agribusiness got scared and has retaliated by destroying their competition through implementation of laws and regulations. It was agribusiness that pushed for national organic standards as real organic moved out of the West coast. Given a true choice and a little education, people do often choose local, naturally raised and grown products.
When you say that personal choices will not work and that we are obsessing about it, what specifically are you referring to? I could agree with that if it were about people who make a personal decision between Wal-Mart and Whole Foods where it would not make a difference. If, however, it were a personal decision between Whole Foods and a local farmer's market, I would beg to differ. It is indisputable that disaster capitalism makes it difficult to impossible to get true choices.
As for saying that free markets do not work, we have to be specific on which definition of "free markets" we are talking about. The current definition that allows big corporations to get away with anything all the while persecuting the little is nothing more than faking "free". On the other hand, if we had a truly free market, small farmers would be given equal opportunities and a fair level playing field as Big Agri. There is so much to think about in all of this and I don't mind getting another headache for putting it all together. A combination of good policies and getting ourselves and each other to make better decisions would certainly help.
P.S.: Thank you for also trying to talk some sense into "Naturally". Cassandra, "Naturally" was very rude in his response to you and he does this to most of us who don't toe his flakey thinking. Yes, he can make good points and write good things for all of us to agree on but his approach stinks to the core. Part of it is that he allows business and politics to be the basis for achievement and that is where he gets it all wrong. For example, he still thinks that Hillary is a progress based on selected votes on issues and that she would be a starring "success" just like her husband. He will look at polls on issues and misuse them to lecture us into "putting pressure" on Congress and then blame us for somehow not doing enough. Even on the issues themselves, he will rely on political polling. He thinks that this nation is getting closer to embracing socialism and that all we have to do is keep calling and sending letters and then we will all "fly" like Peter Pan into socialism-for-all-land despite the harsh reality. When failure strikes, his "blame the individual" mantra can often get irritating.
This is horrible for our lives and health. I never bought from Whole Food but have bought Stoneyfield and Organic Valley. Today I need butter and though I previously bought Organic Valley because it costs less. But never again. Today I will happily pay extra for local and never let another cent go to Organic Valley or Stoneyfield. I f enough of us do this they will feel it.
More than that we must realize the corporations will kill us and the planet if we do not rise up to stop them.
artemix-please check the link to Organic Valley in the first paragraph. I couldn't believe the author lumped them in with WFM and then only discussed WFM. I saw some comments about co-existence but it's almost a feeling of resignation about the inevitable. There are several comments following the article and someone from OV has responded to some of them. I don't see OV using this to protect their profits as WFM seems to be doing.
Of course, instead of "remuneration", the USDA and Monsanto should be sued over destruction of property rights. If someone else's crop messed up a GM crop, you bet they'd be hauling someone to court.
ANOTHER SUPPRESSED INSTANCE OF USDA CAPITULATION TO THE GMO INDUSTRY:
"USDA Certified Organic’s Dirty Little Secret: Neotame"
http://farmwars.info/?p=4897
"Just when we thought that buying “Organic” was safe, we run headlong into the deliberate poisoning of our organic food supply by the FDA in collusion with none other than the folks who brought us Aspartame. NutraSweet, a former Monsanto asset, has developed a new and improved version of this neurotoxin called Neotame. "
Look up Sweetos – its the term for yet another Monsanto product that's still 'USDA Organic'™®! A term coming to mean less and less by the minute.
This is major news in my opinion, yet try doing a Google news search for it.
The legislation passed only recently, but the world did not notice. If they can't undermine, steal and repackage the *idea* of Organic, they WILL steal the term and destroy it.
Yes, Monsanto is now officially sanctioned to add their poisons to ORGANIC food. And we Americans will think that was all for our own best interests... Thanks to our helpful representatives in Washington, and our friends at the FDA.
The people who really know best what lies we are allowed to swallow and consume.