Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The National Empathy Divide
"The loose network among relatives offers the grim solace of knowing that others too have suffered the same curse."
Every terrible rift is the occasion for peace and the place for the peacemaker. And often peace is nothing more, at first, than connecting, pulling the injured or ostracized back into the social circle and the beginning the process of healing.
Peace is not a state of "perpetual pre-hostility," as it has been described by military strategists - that is to say, perpetual armed readiness and checkpoints and unending displays of superior force, eventually and inevitably lapsing into horrific violence. That may be the state of the world, but it's not peace, nor is it sustainable. It's the downward cycle in which we are caught - and in which we fully and enthusiastically participate, with bloated national defense budgets and uncounted trillions spent globally to stay armed, terrified and isolated.
Yet as my friend David Nekimken pointed out, while the policies of what Dr. Martin Luther King called "spiritual death" may be all around us, if we look we can also see "spiritual life" glowing from within the dark.
The New York Times, for instance, saw fit to notice and write about the way in which the family members of mass murderers - whose ranks Randy and Amy Loughner just joined - reach out in "grim solace," as Times reporter Joseph Goldstein put it, to one another. The Loughners have been driven into hiding since their son's rampage, with their house swarmed by reporters hoping to extract tidbits of God knows what, regret, indifference, "local color," to add to their coverage of the Tucson murders.
"When Jared L. Loughner was identified as the gunman who shot 19 people here two Saturdays ago, his parents joined a circle whose membership is a curse: the kin of those who have gone on killing sprees," Goldstein wrote. One of those similarly cursed, David Kaczynski, brother of Unabomber Ted Kaczynski, left a message with their son's public defender, offering to talk to them if they felt the need. Others may follow suit.
". . . the relatives of killers have been known to find comfort in one another, creating a fragile and fraught emotional network among the nation's most isolated families."
What's striking to me about this story is that the Times took the trouble to notice it - to notice and write about the humanity of those on the wrong side of the national empathy divide. The story exists outside the context of vengeance, punishment and titillation - that is to say, incomprehension - which is our normal emotional containment strategy for acts of newsworthy violence.
The story extends humanity to what is perhaps a shockingly large group of people - and the size of this group is, itself, a symptom of deep, unaddressed trouble. All I found lacking in it is the idea that the parents and siblings and others closely connected to the perpetrators of high-profile violent crimes have something to offer only to one another - that "grim solace" and shared isolation are the best they can hope for - with no hint that their return to the great circle that includes all of us is crucial if we are to heal from this national wound.
The movement known as restorative, or transformative, justice, which is slowly taking root and making a difference across the country and around the world, challenges the notion that our basic response to crime should be punishment rather than healing. And healing means restoring a broken system to wholeness, which addresses and honors the complexity of who we are and how we are connected. It includes all of us. The aggrieved and victimized only become empowered when they are able to connect with the ones who have caused them harm.
Furthermore, any criminal act, especially an act of violence, produces consequences, and damages relationships, that radiate in all directions. Only if all who are affected sit down in relationship to one another, a process that is by no means easy or simple, and may well take an enormously long time, can healing occur. Such healing, which means the strengthening of social ties, is the true meaning of peace.
Rupert Ross, in his seminal book on restorative justice, Returning to the Teachings, calls this process "sacred justice."
"The peacemaker is thus an investigator, a teacher and a guide," writes Ross. His or her primary responsibility "is to help each person come to understand that life is relationship, and that a healthy life requires constant effort to provide as much nourishment as possible to every relationship that engages you."
The New York Times story does point out that Mark Kelly, husband of wounded Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, has said publicly that he is open to the idea of meeting with Jared Loughner's parents, recognizing that they're "hurting in this situation as much as anybody."
This reopens the circle and invites some of the ostracized back in. What troubles me is that the state affects no interest in this process. Healing can happen or not, but officially we care only about the bureaucratic pursuit of punishment and the perpetuation of the cycle of violence.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


81 Comments so far
Show AllWhen it comes to our bloated, cruelly punitive, for-profit prison system, I think Michelle Alexander, in her book “The New Jim Crow,” has it right. We have largely unconsciously redirected our hatred and fear of people of color toward a complex system of laws that have served to create of our former slaves an undercaste. We can punish them with hard time and solitary confinement and sadistic prison guards and a violent, out-of control environment with no attempt at rehabilitation, and deny them basic rights when they get out—and make lots of money doing so! We can tear apart their families and neighborhoods trolling for drugs, and then throw them into permanent undercaste conditions while drinking our martinis and sneaking a line or two in, all in the name of Justice! Kenneth Burke, whom I used to read a lot of, spoke of cloaked motivations, where when things don’t seem to make much sense—i.e., why is this guy in solitary confinement for a couple of tabs of LSD while the pulseless Dick Cheney lives in luxury—you have to figure that people are operating on remote control, and what they say they’re doing really doesn’t have much to do with what they’re actually doing.
Unconsciously, we still haven’t gotten the racial hate out of us.
With so many calls to fear spewed out of the media 24/7, it’s hard to stop it—both this hate and all the other tribal ones.
Oh, and Cheney lives in luxury for many reasons, all bogus, including the fact that he owns a good chunk of our prison system. Or so I hear.
Almost all, maybe all thought is unconscious. Everything is predetermined. Why we still have to act, go through the motions, pretend and even believe that we are making choices, may be the ultimate riddle of the universe.
And how is it that you "know" Everything is Predetermined? It is the same belief system that allows religions and apparently pre-determinists, to not take responsibility for their actions - it's all pre-determined or God has a plan or whatever. If more people would take responsibility for their actions and the impact they have while in this universe or on this earth, maybe there would be more empathy and thought before acting and maybe people couldn't so easily ignore or accept atrocity and deprivation of others because it's all ready been decided and they don't need to bother because it won't do any good. You do not know that everything is pre-determined except maybe for yourself and that allows YOU to sit above the commons and be indifferent. It's another symptom of the lack of empathy
"And how is it that you 'know' Everything is Predetermined?"
__________________________________
Presumably THAT'S predetermined too!
Maybe we can just cast a horoscope! lol
>^^<
That's the whole purpose of the pretend christian[biblical harlots]false doctrine[babble] "I'm not responsible,god told me to do it and/or Satan made me do it but I'm not responsible". That the appeal of the pretend chritians. I'm not responsible.........!
"Almost all, maybe all thought is unconscious. Everything is predetermined. Why we still have to act, go through the motions, pretend and even believe that we are making choices, may be the ultimate riddle of the universe."
It may be that everything is predetermined yet even if it is, there is still room for free will. Is there a more important purpose for life than true love?
True love, if it exists at all, is an attribute of God alone, whatever you conceive him to be. True love would have to be all inclusive and unconditional. Think about that. Who do you know who loves like that? What sacrifices would you make for your worst enemy?
Dick Cheney is a repulsive pig, but think about him lying in a hospital bed, naked, under a sheet, dying---just a sick old man in a semiconscious state, what is there left to hate? Or still worse, be indifferent about? Could that not be any one of us? If we didn't know who he was would we not feel compassion for him?
That kind of love is a stretch for me. I am, at 68 still growing, maybe someday...Maybe there are people who are already capable of such love, I wouldn't know. If there are I believe they can make choices; I don't know why, it just seems right. And if the love of God can exist, surely also God.
even if we can know nothing about-----.
re: "True love, if it exists at all, is an attribute of God alone"
I'd say God relies on us to be the expression of his/her love... We exist to be this, imo.
re: "Who do you know who loves like that? What sacrifices would you make for your worst enemy?"
Unconditional love need not apply to all things in manifestation. I give my unconditional love, very very conditionally. Because, once I do, well... I'm stuck, no?
re: "Dick Cheney is a repulsive pig, but think about him lying in a hospital bed, naked, under a sheet, dying---just a sick old man in a semiconscious state, what is there left to hate?"
Hate? I would call it regret and disgust. And there's much of that which will be left after his life on Earth ceases – I'll always regret, oppose and be disgusted by the legacy of hate, suspicion, sadness and oppression he has introduced inextricably through the actions and decisions made throughout his power-mad existence.
re: "Could that not be any one of us?"
It could be, but that's not what is important. What is important is that we have choices in life, like in a choose your own adventure book. Our outcomes, and those we bestow upon the world are based upon a set of circumstances, choices, and consequences.
So, to re-answer, no, actually it could not be just *any* of us that turns into a Dick Cheney. Only the sick, and sadistic and those blinded by the lust for power.
* * *
I believe in universal love, I really do. But if I could forever rid the world of ticks and fleas (and a few other specific species – not including mosquitoes since they're an important food-source for many other animals) I would do it, readily. That's because I actually believe in the love I have – for what is good – deserves that I fight against what truly threatens this. (btw... This is not a false front argument to excuse our wars etc. as I specifically believe the fight against terrorism needs to be solely a criminal endeavor, not military).
Your last line lost me.
namaste
I like this post...not sure if I can go with you on the predetermined thing, though...I still prefer to believe I have choice...
I have an affinity for reincarnation, and chocolate...what does one really know? the current breath...
interesting how often the simple fact that a couple hasn't divorced, or publicly spatted, can be interpreted as love...as we are all alone, and unable to know another's ture, innermost thoughts, avoiding failure becomes success...
could be they hate each other deeply...just quietly, and without demonstration...
regarding Cheney...I believe I have encountered, more than once, the essence of evil...at risk of reputation, ha ha, he and his cohorts give me such feeling...
as much as I like to state our similarities vastly outnumber our differences, differences do exist...could moral ones be among them? if we were not all equal...
hard to know the moral responsibility surrounding the compassion for, or forgiveness of, evil...does evil really care, or is this more an excuse for the victim to do nothing other than 'forgive'?
I am always glad to see your tag on a post...hope you are well...
I am truly sorry you have hatred and fear for people of color. Please don't assume we all do, I find that truly offencive!
>^^<
When I use the word "we," I mean we as a society. Some people reject that "we." I don't because I am part of that society, and feel it is my responsibility to try to change that society for the better. I was raised in a family, and communities, that assumed racism, although they'd balk if you called them on it. It took me many decades to rid myself of the racism instilled in me. Many people who say they are not racist, and truly believe it, still hold racist assumptions that they have never examined.
Cheney and his ilk commit mass murders and nothing is even said about it. A black man, Michael Vick goes to jail and is condemned by the MSM for his atrocities of fighting dogs.Marion Jones, a black woman, does jail time for perjury.Cheney refuses to be questioned under oath, so he can't be convicted of perjury because he is given a license to lie.
With a PIC, prison industrial complex,the prison population has quadrupled for the purpose of increased profits. The PIC has legislatures draft Taliban type laws for the purpose of incarceration and the prison population has gone from 750,000 to over 2,500,000 now all because of the Americanized Taliban. Furthermore, people are not sent to prison to be punished, prison itself is the punishment. American prison have not always been brutal at one time their were no wholesale rapes and availability of drug.Prisons in Europe do not have these hazards.Of course, with the prison officials condoning these atrocities the recidivism rate is high and that's what the PIC wants. Prison are rife with corruption starting with who's granted the construction contracts to providing the goods and services all subject to graft, corruption and legalized criminal bribery for the politicians.The prison are the Talibanization of American and American don't even know it, although it is their tax monies[forced contributions] that pay for it. They complain about taxes supporting higher education but not a protest about their taxes for prisons.
One of my sons was murdered at work two years ago and I have to attend another sanity hearing for his murderer in about a week.
This single act that lasted only three minutes has changed the lives of dozens of real people beside my son and his murderer.
Two years later and we all still are grieving... I'm sure that the murderers family is grieving, too. Soon after the murder I felt that someone should talk with that family... I wanted to. I wanted to tell them it was OK. That I shared their grief in this horrible situation.
But I couldn't... and I still can't.
You see... compassion would jepordize a "fair hearing" and could "influence the outcome at trial".
Do I even need to say anything else?
... BTW ... We are not the same race or economic class as the murderer and his family. You know what... race, economics, politics... none of that has been any part of the pain and grief.
Some things transcend politics.
Bob: My sincere sympathy to you and yours.
I agree with you. I have absolutely no sympathy or empathy for these criminals. Neither do I have any compassion for War Criminals, nor their enablers and protectors.
My wife and I were victims of an armed robbery several years ago, where the thugs held guns to our heads and threatened to kill us. The police said, in cases like this, they often kill the victims. The perpetrators were never caught.
My reaction was – let me just say that I never have to worry about being called for jury duty.
Certinally shows a lack of balance in our so called justice system, Most every previous socity could see that murders need to die, Sanity not withstanding, the act of murder is clearly insane. How do you pay for a life taken? How can you? for any truly honest person, you can't! Only by the elimination of the killer can balance be restored.
DUI, Accident no matter, you can not repay a life except with a life! Balance must rule, justice is nothing else, else it is a fraud!
How many have the banksters killed with their derivutives? their poison Home Loans. How many times can they die? I wouldn't mind finding out, yet they sit at Aspen and the worlds finest tables gorgeing themselves on their ill gotten gains!
I never bought into the fantacy of Heven and Hell, if they skip punishment in this life they skip. That's why I belive in stern but balance oriented justice here on earth. Also it would reduce prison populations greatly!
>^^<
Great article, very pertinent for our times. I have never really considered the effect on the family and those close to mass murderers. However in one way or another we must all share in the pain of social eclusion of self or others for lesser crimes. Gender, skin color, spiritual beliefs, political beliefs. How quickly we all rush to decide if the individual is inside our social network our outside it, mostly based on weaknesses of our own, fear, old wounds, old experience. We all seem to have a part in this great truth presented today in this well written article, especially here where odd ostracisms abound.
I think we're too quick to exclude. I know in the last 10+ years I have enjoyed a great amount of excusion, due to disability. Humans it seems can't love, The average stray cat gives love more readly than a Human. We need to open our eyes it's nearly too late! As the prophet love your neighbors you love your self!
>^^<
ELIZABETH & BOB: Interesting posts.
Does anyone remember the name of the young woman murdered in South Africa when she was doing humanitarian work there? The story aired on "60 Minutes" about 7 years ago. It gained interest because the young woman's parents went to Africa to continue her work! That is how they made good on the death of their beloved daughter.
"60 Minutes" found the story intriguing because, like Koehler's references, the family's intent was not vengeance-based; but rather, the pursuit of a higher form of humanitarian love. That expression is all too rare in our nation.
When I was student teaching in New York, I bonded with a teacher whose daughter had been murdered. She became active in an organization known as "Parents of Murdered Children."
Persons who experience the same mortal wound have a basis for a unique form of empathy. This concept was captured vividly, with profound satire, by Jules Pfeiffer in the film, "Little Murders." I think its depictions are brilliant.
Once when I was visiting New York, both my daughters pint-size, we got on a subway. Two men came on frothing at the mouth and yelled that they had a bomb. No one even looked up from their newspapers. It was surreal. Of course I couldn't help but react, and grabbed my children to dart out at the first subway stop.
Jules Pfeiffer shows a scene of someone mugged who makes his way down the subway steps and gets onto a train. No one looks up, although he's brutally wounded. Only someone else who's been stabbed (and is bleeding) shows any empathy or willingness for HUMAN (as in eye) contact.
When I use the phrase, "Mars rules," it is intended to show the disproportionate emphasis modern American culture places on war, uber: individualism, violent "solutions," and proofs of toughness. We end up with a society that loses an equal measure of those qualities associated with Venus: love, compassion, peace, diplomacy, law, balance, and basic decency.
Usually when I make this point, I get attacked... which is really quite telling, and essentially proves my thesis.
Sioux, the young woman who was murdered in South Africa was Amy Biehl.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2000/02/28/60II/main165933.shtml
I wished that more Americans would take the time to do what her family did and get to know that they were not really killers but the victims of the apartheid started by Raygun. As it is, people in South Africa are generally friendly despite Washington trying to push that nation back to apartheid status. Thank you for bringing up your point on "Mars rules". I look back and think that despite other nations successfully trying to live peacefully, they are always in an uphill battle against the remote forces Washington doing everything it can to force them into militancy. The ongoing battle against "austerity" reflects that.
Actually, although I do not remember approving of anything President Reagan did, one thing I can be sure of is that he did not start apartheid in South Africa. That began about 200 years ago when the Boers took over that land. As far as I know Reagan did not do anything to counteract apartheid, but neither did any other American president.
Regarding how friendly South Africans are, in an interview once, Nadine Gordimer told a reporter that even she, who had written and campaigned extensively about the evils of apartheid would not be safe in the streets when people were rioting. She said that she would just be another white person, who probably was an enemy.
Most people in most places are friendly, but not all of the time.
There are plenty of articles that prove Raygun's connection to the South Africa apartheid but this one which I recall reading describes Raygun's cruel attitude towards South Africa.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0609-03.htm
Ronnie could not undo the Civil Rights Act of 1965 so he had the nerve to push for ethnic cleansing elsewhere. It sickens me that Obama would praise such a heartless racist and trash the 1960s and 70s progressives and their movements.
I do not blame you for your previous support of RR. We are seeing the same thing with Obama and his remaining bot supporters who still cling to him shamelessly. I look back at my life from growing up in the rurals to being a city girl and then moving to the suburbs due to the painful costs of living and fear of insecurity.
Believe it or not, the white flight from the big cities to the rurals and suburbs has been nothing more than racism slowly creeping up without waking up the public. The religious "right" has also had its share of using "God" against minorities and women. I know that they hated the Civil Rights Act of 1965, Roe v Wade, Billie Jean showing the world that women can be just as ambitious and successful as men, etc... . Well, their chipping away efforts over the years and decades has paid off and they still keep begging shamelessly for more.
In the meantime, the "we got to be practical" Obamabots are useless as well. Obama could stifle the civil rights of women and minorities and the Obamabots would hail that as "progress". That makes even the former Reaganites "harmless" in pale comparison. We are at a point where the Reaganite disease has been so pervasive that we will need to purge it deeply and hope that other nations can successfully fight off this nation's plague before it traps them in the same fateful status as the USA. I say good work on your part and keep it up.
Legalized Apartheid was enacted in South Africa in 1946 and it was fashioned after the the segregation laws of the Southern States which also served as an inspiration for Apartheid.
Jennifer: Thank you for providing the data.
"So either you were a student in the eighties, or the 60's and probably earlier 70's."
She once said that she was educated in the 1970s.
I'm aware of the conflict between you and her but I don't think it's good to get too angry with her on it. Save your attacks for when she attacks and then counter-attack if you must.
I'm not siding with ctrl-z or doing any good cop bad cop shit. Now you're doing exactly what you accuse SR and Ctrl-Z of doing. Control yourself or go see a psychiatrist.
I wouldn't be talking if I was you after the admins kicked your rude replies out recently on another thread. I was gonna post a response to your last one on flagging me but you got in trouble I see. I didn't flag your posts by the way but whoever did agreed that you tried to start the war with SR on that thread. I ain't no FOX editorial either. I'm ok with myself but you're having anger management problems. Take a break and relax.
Leave Marco out of this discussion. There's no way you can equate me with Marco or Ctrl-Z. Your anger is playing tricks on you. You have a personal problem that needs fixing. I suggest you take a break from the site and fix yourself before you return. It's for your own good. That or keep getting corrupted by rbtl's bile and hate spew.
Dennis D.: In most cases responding just encourages them. Just ignore them (I mean really ignore them, not pull the stick-out-your-tongue, hit reply and type IGNORED nonsense the twins like).
You're right. I can be slow sometimes to figure out who's not worth responding to. Their recent dialogue on this thread shows who the lamest sock puppets are. Best to ignore them indeed.
Thanks, but your ID's show just above your postings. No need to warn us.
Of course, sometimes an opportunity is just too good to pass up. :-)
I'm kinda regretting this one to be a mistake to think it was an opportunity. Another lesson learned.
Yeah very nice of you to say that when you're in need of anger management lessons.
I am fully expecting to be criticized for my comment here. And that is A OK with me!
Since the Black Trench Coat Mafia mass murder in Columbine, i have been saying that the parents need to bear some culpability. This guy lived at home and i have no doubt that his parents knew he was seen as a threat. Especially considering that he was expelled from college because of this. The neighbor knew it, as she was interviewed by Amy Goodman.
His parents had a moral obligation, both for the sake of their son and the community at large, to try to have him committed, if he refused to seek help willingly. Now, having said this, i am well aware of how difficult it is to bring this about. However, it appears that after his expulsion, it should have been quite doable.
Kumbaya isn't very helpful here. I also have found, after many years of experience in the field, that sociopaths are not exactly well treated at home when growing up. I am always amazed by how surprised people are that human psychology isn't formed in vacuums.
And while i am on the subject of this whole event - i am certain that if the shooter had a Muslim name he would be a 'terrorist'- but that is off subject, i know.
Too many people get their information from Oprah's book club. Uh oh. She now owns her own OWN!! Everyone gets a Chevy!!!
Good comment! well thought out.
>^^<
empathy just doesn't feel the same anymore.
The difference between being murdered and living a full happy life is only a matter of time. We have no information on which to base our fear of death, except for our absence here and now. Yet we spend our only lives squabbling about ego. Until we make an attempt to accept death and no longer fear it we will forever attempt to blame the inevitable on someone else. We know not from where we began and we know not where we will end. Empathy or apathy, both acknowledge a seperation of all living things. No such distinction can be made.
Well said Wiretap. Americans seem to be phobic in general with death topping the endless list of their fears. "Die daily" is the admonition of great sages for it keeps ego in check. "Fear poisons our souls; it's children are cruelty, deceit, and suspicion" (to paraphrase Steinbeck); "Fear corrupts" notes Ann San Suu Kyi, and we are a corrupt society that would (do?) murder half the world to chase a few spooks out from under our collective beds. Man's justice is always flawed and likely further from devine justice than Hell's Kitchen is from the Pearly Gates of Heaven, if I may wax biblical. Death is actually a beautifull thing and very neccessary to Nature. Even stars and universes don't last forever; all things must end, even man!
"To sleep, perhaps to dream." Peace.
We also have no information to base our security in life upon either, we have the here, i'm not sure about how many have the 'now' though. The other side of the coin of accpeting death and not fearing it, is accepting life and not fearing it. They are both part of what is. To have dying things, you must have living things. Perhaps our whole language needs to advance to there are things, minus judgement. That is, that is, that is, that is, that is. I think that when this ego splintering is balanced with some creative unifying, we have a better chance of seeing a new way to be. It is not so much that we make distintions in thinking, but that those distinctions of thought become extinctions of thought. This extinction of thought which leads to all kinds of illness is a form of spiritual death well known through time.