Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Rocky Times Ahead: Are You Ready?
This isn't a future you can, or should, face alone. How to make sure you don't have to.
"I don't believe the economy is getting better," says Billy R., a member of a mutual aid group in Oregon that he jokingly calls "my reality support group." "All around me I'm surrounded by media and advertising urging me to keep borrowing, buying, and sleepwalking. I love meeting with others who are staring down the potential risks and challenges of the future."
Maybe more of us could use a reality support group.
Even with the announcement that the official unemployment rate fell to 9.4 percent, millions of people remain in dismal economic straits. The pace of home foreclosures has barely slowed and millions remain out of work. Even upbeat scenarios still assume protracted unemployment and economic stagnation for much of the decade ahead. The unspoken scenario is that things could get worse.
Can forming a small group like this really make a difference, when the problems we face seem so overwhelming? History tells us they can.
So here's the point: you must not face the future alone. Find your own "reality support group" (we'll tell you how below). This year, make a resolution to deepen your relationships with people around you with whom you can face what's coming down the pike.
Sometime during the next couple of years, there will likely be a fundamental shift. It might be another economic meltdown along the lines of 2008, or a shock to the economy thanks to a rapid spike in energy costs. It could be a series of extreme weather events that result in flooding, drought, or unprecedented heat waves. Think Hurricane Katrina on a larger scale. These changes could lead to food and water shortages-and test our personal and community preparedness in ways that we have not experienced in our lifetimes.
You should know that we, the authors of this piece, are not apocalyptic, bunker-building, pessimistic people. We're both parents, gardeners, and active in our neighborhoods. We like a good football party-though we root for different teams (Patriots v. Steelers).
We believe our society has almost everything we need to build stronger communities, reduce inequality, live in harmony with the earth, and make a graceful transition to a new sustainable economy. But we won't get there ignoring the data, and we won't get there disconnected from one another.
We're not talking about yet another issue campaign. We certainly need to remain engaged in the good fights around economic justice, peace, democracy, the environment. But there is something huge missing right now in our approach to social change. Our social movements are weak and, with some inspiring exceptions, not changing the political dynamics. The "Net Roots"-online organizing and social media-are creative ways to aggregate money and power in specific situations, but online activism is not a substitute for a movement based on durable and trusting face-to-face relationships. In some religious and labor traditions, this is called solidarity.
Fearful, Alone, & Ashamed
Presently in the United States we are witnessing the emergence of politics based on fear and the erosion of status. Millions of people saw their livelihoods and dreams collapse in the aftermath of the economic meltdown. People lost their homes, jobs, savings, and sense of a positive future. They've had to adjust their expectations-for example, facing the reality that they may never be able to retire or improve their standard of living.
Some people respond to these circumstances by blaming themselves and feeling ashamed about their difficulties. Many are hunkering down, feeling depressed and withdrawn. In the U.S., we tend to think everything is about the individual-even blaming ourselves for things that are largely beyond our control.
Others of us respond by scapegoating others, often those more disadvantaged. These responses often come from a place of fear, isolation, and shame.
There is good reason to be angry and focus on powerful financial and political actors who are responsible. But, as in the grieving process, we must move from anger to a place where we can boldly face today's difficult realities and also initiate pro-active responses. We can start by learning to accept and live within new limits set by economic and ecological reality. Many people are already deliberately moving away from the old economy, and they're finding new types of security and abundance. Perhaps unsurprisingly, they often feel much richer than they did in lives defined by the "work-watch-spend" cycle.
Rebecca Solnit, in her remarkable book A Paradise Built In Hell, reminds us to look for the "shadow governments of kindness," the deep reservoirs of resilience and compassion that emerge during disasters and troubled times. All over the planet, people are defying the stereotypes of the self-centered "economic man" and instead caring for one another, building alternative economies, and deepening solidarity.
A Movement to Build Economic Security
The good news is people are already coming together in small groups to form and strengthen relationships. Some are called "common security clubs," while others go by names like "mutual aid groups," "resilience circles," and "unemployed support groups."
Call it what you want, but the purpose is the same: getting together regularly-8 to 15 adults-to face ecological and economic change. Small group organizing is part of the missing architecture in our social movements ... which may be why it's catching on so quickly.
Such groups are designed to strengthen our personal and community resilience. They typically have three purposes: to learn together, support one another through mutual aid, and engage in social action.
Learn together. It's hard enough for each of us alone to keep up with news about the ways our changing economy and ecology are impacting our lives. But it's particularly challenging to face unsettling realities in isolation. In order to move forward, we need a community to help us learn and figure out how to deal with our fear, anger, loss, and feelings of betrayal.
Group members watch videos, read articles, talk to each other, and organize forums. Since the "experts" mostly got things wrong two years ago, participants are investigating things for themselves. What's really happening in the economy? What caused the economic meltdown? What's changed? What are the ecological risk points? How will the decline of cheap, easy-to-get oil affect the future economy? What will a transition to a new economy look like?
Mutual Aid. Our mutual aid muscles are out of shape. We need to find ways to increase our real economic security and web of support through shared resources, skills, experience, and capacities. Some folks do this through extended families, religious congregations, and ethnic and fraternal associations. But millions of people are disconnected from extended family and the immigrant and civic associations that helped earlier generations survive. And many religious congregations have gotten out of the practice of being centers of mutual aid.
Common security clubs often gather around potlucks, sharing food and recipes for healthy, low-cost meals. They support one another to get out of debt, brainstorm about employment options, share tips on saving money. They form bartering circles to swap skills, tools, and time. They talk about the challenges of parents moving in with children, children moving in with parents-and adjusting to new norms and limits as a result of the changing economy and future.
Social Action. Many of us want to make meaningful change at the local and national level. We want to find ways to constructively channel our anger and fear to resist further Wall Street destruction of our local economies. We want to act together in ways that go beyond online petitions or phone calls to our member of Congress. Think "affinity group" or "social action group"-a place to deepen our effectiveness as a small unit, but be part of larger movements.
Common security clubs in particular have worked for national policy changes, from universal health care and Wall Street financial reform to the extension of unemployment benefits. Many clubs, animated by the "break up with your bank" and "move your money" efforts, relocated personal, congregational, and other funds out of Wall Street, and into community banks and credit unions.
Other clubs have connected with community-wide "transition" efforts, inspired by the Transition Town movement sweeping England and now moving U.S. communities into action. Transition neighborhoods and towns proactively prepare themselves for climate change, economic hardship, and the decline in easy-to-get oil and cheap energy-with its huge implications for transportation, food security, building design, and our standard of living. Within the broader initiatives, small personal groups like common security clubs provide a place where people can meet to practice mutual aid and reciprocity. Both transition towns and common security clubs are integral components of building needed personal and community resilience.
A Few Stories
Encouraging stories are emerging from common security clubs and other mutual aid groups.
A group of unemployed workers in Maine created a resource sharing exchange. They met regularly at the library and laughed so much the librarian didn't believe they were economically struggling.
A group in Greenfield, Massachusetts calls themselves "the neighbors" and meets monthly to check in, sing together, and practice mutual aid. On another night they meet for a monthly game night-what one member called "fun and affordable entertainment."
In Fort Wayne, Indiana, a network of Unemployed and Anxiously Employed Workers meets weekly and has formed committees to help educate one another about computer use, unemployment insurance, stress management in tough times, and green job opportunities. "Part of our work is to help face the unemployment bureaucracy so people get their benefits," said Tom Lewandowski, a founder of the group. They invite people leaving unemployment offices to join the group. Members volunteer at libraries on Sunday afternoons to help unemployed workers file claims online.
Small Groups in Social Movements
Can forming a small group like this really make a difference, when the problems we face seem so overwhelming? History tells us they can. At many crucial moments in our past, small groups have played an essential role in incubating the seeds of great change.
During the Great Depression of the 1930s, more than 27,000 "Share Our Wealth" clubs formed to discuss the causes of the Depression and advocate for a radical program of wealth redistribution.
Also in the 1930s, seniors organized "Townsend Clubs" to advocate for old age pensions-a formidable social movement that added to the pressure to establish Social Security. By 1936, more than 8,000 Townsend Clubs had been formed with over 2 million members. In ten states-including Oregon, Colorado, California, Florida, South Dakota-there were more than 50 clubs per congressional district.
In the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s, people formed nonviolent direct action groups to engage in sit-ins and keep up morale. Activists rooted in faith-based congregations and tight-knit communities were able to take greater risks knowing that if they should be jailed (or worse), there were others to care for their children and elders.
The women's movement was built upon small consciousness-raising groups, which enabled millions of women to reflect on their identity. "The personal is political" was experienced in thousands of face-to-face gatherings, ultimately shifting gender attitudes throughout the society. The anti-nuclear movement in the late 1970s formed "affinity groups" as part of direct action efforts to prevent power plants from being built.
In the labor movement, the success of organizing female clerical workers into trade unions depended upon an organizing approach that included small support groups. Large mega-churches have grown upon a foundation of "small group ministry" in which members connect through smaller, face-to-face groups. A growing number of organizers today are examining the "power of networks" in social movements.
Given the challenges we're collectively facing in the present, where are such movements today? It appears that without a lived experience of "solidarity" in our personal lives, it can be difficult to respond to an abstract call for the common good. It may be that small group organizing is central to our hopes for broad-based change.
|
How to Start a |
Potential Shock Points
There is good reason to believe that the next 10 years are going to be very different than the 10 years prior to the 2008 economic meltdown. Persistent unemployment means that millions of people may live out the decade in an economic depression.
Moreover, the underlying economic structures that brought on the collapse have not been addressed. We remain at risk for more financial nosedives. As a result, new Wall Street economic bubbles and busts may emerge. The "danger" light on the dashboard is still flashing...
In fact, the future could bring any number of "shock points": another economic meltdown along the lines of 2008; a further increase in unemployment, even to 20 percent; more extreme weather events (hurricanes, floods, droughts, heat waves); new spikes in the cost of energy; rapid deflation as the value of money falls; a dramatic increase in the cost of food; and/or shortages of fresh water.
Because of the extreme inequalities of income and wealth that have opened up over the last generation, the brunt of these changes is falling, and will continue to fall, most intensely on lower and middle income and disadvantaged folks. But these changes will touch everyone in various ways, even those who believe they have built a wall of economic security around their families.
These are some of the reasons people need to face the future together and strengthen the social fabric of our communities. This is not a future you can, or should, face alone.
The Transition to the New Economy
Eight million jobs in the old economy are not coming back. But new jobs, enterprises, and livelihoods are emerging. We are seeing vibrant new kinds of enterprises in the local food sector, green building, and alternative transportation, as well as locally rooted cooperatives and producers. These are the pieces of a new economy that is emerging piecemeal around the country-an economy based upon entirely different models of economic growth and indicators of community health, and also new conceptions of wealth, community, and governance.
This new economy includes financial institutions invested in the real economy, like community banks and credit unions walled off from the Wall Street speculation that adds no real value to our economy. It includes respect for "all that we share"-our commons of public and private institutions such as libraries, schools, or agricultural knowledge. It is based on sound management and protection of the gifts of nature including water systems, seed banks, and land conservancies.
In the current political moment, leadership for large-scale transition to this new economy will not come from Washington, D.C., but from movements around green jobs, local manufacturing, alternative transportation, regional food, and more. This is a moment for each of us to reflect on our own power and agency. We each have a role to play, but perhaps we aren't sure what it is yet. This is where your small group is important. Small groups help disconnected individuals find their roles, turning them into community players who contribute to the movements toward the new economy.
If we are prepared for a transition, we will be in much better shape than if we simply hope life will somehow return to normal. If we have our "core group," we can face changes with less fear and more sense of our personal agency. Together, we will be able to work toward an economy that works for everyone.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


115 Comments so far
Show AllThey both appear to be sniveling corporate fascist whores to me. Watching those two respect each other has little value in my book. One only look at the environmental disaster that China has become and realize that the leadership in China is as corrupt as that of the US.
I wasn't posting for argumentation purposes. I was just throwing out a different perspective. One I have been struggling with. I have to question how much acceptance and cooperation are really part of the whole psychology of victim and enabler. We can think good thoughts all we want but I think our actions speak far louder. I can think about compassion and goodness while I strangle you with my hands as a case in point. The same way we think about freedom and democracy as we drone bomb nations, engage in drug wars which marginalize both foreign peoples and our own populace, engage in wholesale exploitation of peoples to provide us clothing and plastic toys, relegate native populations to reservations of poverty and alcoholism, the list is endless.
Let's not kid ourselves, evil is afoot. Talking sticks, respect for our fellow humans, respect for our fellow earthlings and respect for mother earth herself are good things. Unfortunately, we're so far from that model in a practical sense, I find myself trying to envision precursors to genuine change, both at a personal and collective level. Acceptance and cooperation with evil is evil. I'm certain of that fact. Even if the tribe votes me down a million to one, I will maintain that reality.
If organization and cooperation have taken us to this point in the path, perhaps we should consider something different. Like you, I have nothing for sale, no minds to change or control.
Yah, I hear you. Each of us has to follow our own path and in those decentralized efforts effective lifeways will emerge as useful and practical. I choose not to confront the plutocracy believing that it is a lost cause; but instead, choose to birth lifeway's that transcend the old system, and blunt the effects of it's death upon us.
The values that Americans have been taught has instilled them with mindlessness, the inability to discern thoughts from facts. Mindlessness is orchestrated by the government, businesses and the pretend christians[biblical harlots] which institutionalizes it thereby giving it legitimacy and creating peer pressure for mindlessness. The MSM recites the USG/MIC, Mafia Industrial Complex,mindlessness propaganda and
TV is especially effective. Mindlessness propaganda is evidenced by the day, hour, minute, second.
I agree. The plutocrats appear to purposely promote nonsensical ideas to create a sort of information chaos and logic chaos, making it more difficult for individuals to sort through all the noise to get a clear picture of what is happening and making it virtually impossible for any large groups to form made up of individuals that share that clear picture. Most of the little people in the US are so broken down by this method that they lose faith in their own reasoning abilities and they absorb whatever the plutocrats tell them with little resistance, even if it is complete nonsense and obviously is inconsistent with such little people's interests.
I actually think it is more profound than that. It is a psychology of victim and enabler. It is pervasive in our culture and we are bombarded with it from every angle. From plutocrat to peasant, the message is loud and clear. At this point, you have large segments of the working class railing against their own self-interest. I find it quite strange.
Their self-interest is in as much protecting their worldview.
As long as American capitalism stays in place no economic-financial stability will ever happen until those individuals and families whose incomes are derived from profits voluntarily agree that their incomes need not be larger than $ 100,000 and that the remainder of profits must be disbursed as salaries to workers. Since that will never happen, a very bleak future is on the horizon.
As long as workers refuse to take full responsibility and leadership for what they produce a very bleak future is on the horizon. Since workers in our nation have not done that after 1848 no economic-financial stability is likely to ever happen.
I try to read through all of the comments before responding. Sort of like allowing others to hold the 'talking stick.' Sometimes I just move on w/o responding (i.e. my thoughts were conveyed by another poster already - usually better), sometimes I cannot contain the impetus to respond, and interject or interrupt before getting to the end.
But this is a virtual medium. We don't 'see' each other face-to-face, and most of our identities remain hidden (I accept any and all attacks of 'hypocrisy' - suffice it to say, I have my reasons...)
A few things come to mind.
1_We must frame the overriding issue of party affiliation, groupthink, "lesser-evilism" etc., into the following meme: It is the Corporate Party vs. Everyone else. The sold-out political hacks in Congress and State Legislatures, be they blue or red, do not work for US. Nor do any of the liberal institutions of the not-so-distant past (unions, higher education, the arts). The system is corrupt to the core. It cannot be fixed from 'within'. On this point is where we must resist the demagogical, professional "left".
2_Social organizing of the type mentioned in the article IS a form of rebellion. The fight can take many shapes. It is counterproductive to argue the merits of destroying first to create, or building another alternative which may then attract the masses. The key operative word is 'action through cooperation' with one clear objective: survival.
3_Will it be a hard or soft revolution? Will we go down with a whimper or a bang? My (or anyone else's) opinion on such matters is immaterial, because we cannot predict the future. However, we can PREPARE for it. This is what the article advocates: Simple cooperation with the underlying realization that we are all connected.
Peace.
Well said.
Forest, do you agree or disagree with the post by John J Coghlan? If you agree, then there is no basis for your feud with me. If you disagree, will you allow that those with whom you disagree have a legitimate view that - while you may take another view - should be heard without speculation and insinuations about their motives and character?
The problems were not created by Labor Unions, or Lazy Workers. The problems were created by Big Business, for the sole purpose of creating bigger profits, at the expense of jobs for the American Workers. They not only save money shipping jobs to other countries, but when you have high unemployment in this country, you can hire people for lower wages. The end result is a lower standard of living for the middle class, and a higher standard of living for the rich and privileged. This has not happened by chance. It has taken a lot of planing by Corporate America, and our Government.
The Media wants to get working people to look in the wrong direction, to blame each other, or blame some one else for our problems. How stupid can some people be? The poor and middle class in this country are broke because we have been robed. I don't know how much clearer that can be.
Money doesn't disappear, it only moves from one place to another. The middle class's money didn't vanish. Somebody else has got it. While husband and wife are working sometime two jobs just to make ends meet, the rich and privileged are living better than they ever have. Guess where your money went.
Corporate controlled Television has a steady flow of propaganda which keeps telling everyone that we are all moving in the best direction, and as the troops march by and patriotic Americans are saluting old glory, the bastards are picking their pockets. Money is being squandered on wars that no body wants, and while the war machine generates big profits for the upper class, the rest of us go without, decent health care, good jobs, good schools, and some folks don't even have a roof over their heads any more.
Welfare for the needy has been replaced by Welfare for the greedy. The rich have been the recipients of the new government giveaways. The billion dollar bailouts given to Wall Street were in part converted into holiday bonuses for top management. How much did you get for a holiday bonus this year? The Fat Cats have been getting million dollar bonuses, thanks to you the Tax Payer. Most people only see the poor guy down the street who is getting free food stamps from the government to feed his kids.
I guess the conservatives think giving the rich money, is better for the economy. I mean they build big mansions that they will pay property taxes on. The money will recirculate and feed the capitalist system,and than it will trickle down on us all, and everyone will prosper. On the other hand, the poor hungry child that you give food to, will eat the food and it will be gone. The next day it will need more food. A solution to the problem would be to withhold the food. When the child is dead, the problem will be solved. I am not trying to make a sick joke. Many conservatives think exactly this way. The word conservative is misleading. These people are full fledged nuts.
The Bush Administration has built concentration camp prison facilities around the country. I can only imagine what they are for. May be they could be used to house the people who waged illegal wars, tortured, murdered, kidnapped, fixed elections, robed the treasury, trashed the constitution, polluted the environment, destroyed the economy, and damaged our good name in the world.
I don't think a violent revolution ever solved anything, but I do think a powerful social revolution is in order. WE THE PEOPLE have got the bastards out numbered 100 to 1.
Lets take back what has been taken from us. With all of our money back, we could feed the world, buy our homes back, support our family by working one job like we use to, and start living like middle class people again. The new deal would even have something in it for the rich blood suckers that have been living off of us for so long. With all the old factories opening up again they could put in an application for a job. What an enriching experience it would be for these people who have never worked a day in their life to be able to work and support them selves.
God helps those who help them selves. Wall Street ain't going to do it. Neither are the people in Washington who are working for Wall Street.
Good comment. Thanks for writing it.
Excellent post.
Whoever will that take advantage of the chaos due to the shortcomings of the capitalist system they will have to provide the Peoples of the World an economy that can meet their needs. The only credible alternative that is proposed to you is ☮ La Nouvelle Économie.
☮ La Nouvelle Économie.
http://blog.d-s.me/
Qui que soient ceux qui profiterons du Chaos du aux défaillances du Système Capitaliste il leurs faudra fournir aux Peuples du Monde une économie qui pourra subvenir à leur besoins. La seule alternative crédible qui vous soit proposée est ☮ La Nouvelle Économie.
☮ La Nouvelle Économie.
http://blog.d-s.me/
מי שזה לא ינצל את התוהו ובוהו בשל החסרונות של השיטה הקפיטליסטית הם יצטרכו לספק את עמים העולמי כלכלה שיכול לענות על הצרכים שלהם. החלופה היחידה אמינה הציע האם אתה הוא
☮ La Nouvelle Économie.
http://blog.d-s.me/