EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- German Official Warns of Immediate 'Revolution' if EU Adopts US Model
- Think Fracking Is Bad? Wait Until You Hear about the Gas Industry's "Acid Jobs"
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- Beware Capitalist Tools
- We’re Being Watched: How Corporations and Law Enforcement Are Spying on Environmentalists
- Burning Tulsa: The Legacy of Black Dispossession
- Think Fracking Is Bad? Wait Until You Hear about the Gas Industry's "Acid Jobs"
- We’re Being Watched: How Corporations and Law Enforcement Are Spying on Environmentalists
- German Official Warns of Immediate 'Revolution' if EU Adopts US Model
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Paradox of Disarmament
Will there be copycats?
Will parents let their children attend political rallies anymore? Will Congress ever come to our corner again?
We witness another impromptu festival of American violence, this one in front of a Tucson Safeway. One more place that used to be safe and ordinary, suitable for children, is suddenly, for one random moment, a free-fire zone. A 9-year-old girl who wanted to learn how government works is among the half dozen dead. Democratic Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, shot in the head, fights for her life.
What do we do now, other than shrug, shudder, grieve?
A few days later, one priority - one - remains standing in the wreckage. How in God's name do we disarm?
How do we disarm our impulses, our fears, our fantasies, our miscalculations? How do we disarm our language, which has us going to war with virtually every problem we face?
Even Sarah Palin gets it. At least she did for an embarrassing oops of a moment, and removed the crosshairs from her map of America. Guess that doesn't look so good right now: a bunch of Democrats in her rifle sites. Not in the wake of a disturbed young man's assassination attempt (with collateral damage) on one of them.
The paradox of disarmament goes as deep into the American psyche, perhaps the human psyche, as anything I can imagine.
I say this remembering how much I loved guns and war games as a boy, remembering the magnetic pull of weapons and heroism, bravery and duty. I have vivid memories, for instance, of an artillery show put on by the Army at a local park in my hometown: tanks, bazookas, real weapons fired off. Afterwards, all the kids were allowed to run down there and hunt for souvenirs. I found a rifle shell casing and a flattened slug, which became sacred objects of my boyhood. I took them to church: secrets hidden in my pants pocket. When I got bored during the service, I'd take them out, stare at them.
I don't believe in eliminating this yearning from boyhood, pronouncing it politically incorrect and pretending it will just go away. This was all about growing up: coming into our power as human beings. The furious opposition triggered by gun control efforts flows directly out of what can only be called a religious fervor for empowerment, which is resistant to all logic on the harmfulness of widespread gun availability or the ineffectiveness of violent conflict resolution.
If people in large numbers are going to embrace domestic disarmament - and demand disarmament among nations - they must believe in means of empowerment that transcend the whack-a-mole logic of gun ownership and find the courage to examine the consequences of violence-centered belief systems. This will only happen when children, yearning to be heroes, are able to transform into adults who understand that empowerment involves something more complicated than dominating others; that it requires the cultivation of compassion, empathy and a cooperative spirit.
For this to happen at a level that makes a social difference, our primary institutions must grow up: the ones that greet young people on the brink of adulthood, in particular, the media and military. Right now I think they're going in the wrong direction. The essence of a failure to grow up is a simplistic division of reality into good and evil, and I fear we've stalled at this level, and have built our economy around it. We live in a world that believes in, and requires, enemies, and such a world is not going to disarm.
The belief that to be an American is to be armed runs wide and deep. For instance: "If suicide terrorists DO attack our city, ARMED CITIZENS could be the First to counter these hostilities in our individual neighborhoods." Thus testified Dick Heller, plaintiff in the landmark 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller, in which the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects the individual, not simply the collective, right to bear arms.
And: "Our Founding Fathers understood that the guys with the guns make the rules." These are the words of National Rifle Association CEO Wayne LaPierre, speaking last year at the 2009 Conservative Political Action Conference.
An abundance of such commentary - logically limited but deeply embedded in our psychology - can be found on the "Insurrectionism Timeline" maintained by the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence in the wake of the 2008 Supreme Court decision (to which I was alerted by Brad Friedman). The timeline also notes the instances in which such rhetoric tipped into actual violence, perpetrated by disturbed loners and anti-government fanatics. Some 20 incidents since June 2008 are listed, resulting in about 35 deaths, a large percentage of whom were police officers.
The belief that only the armed are empowered has breached the constraints of social sanity. We owe it to the victims of the Tucson tragedy, and for the all the victims who preceded them, to examine our consciences and press for disarmament in thought and action. We cannot grieve if we still have enemies in our crosshairs.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


14 Comments so far
Show AllI don't have a gun. I have courage.
I think that you also have an intellect which recognizes that you do not need to have a gun in order to be either a man or an American.
But...but... you don't have any right to that under the Constitution...
The question is not if we should or should not have guns, because the answer is we do have guns. So the question is knowing we have them, do we know what we should use them for? Also should people have them minus learning that legally they can only use them for what they should be used for as dictated by law? Have we created these laws? Do we understand that in order to avoid or greatly minimize shootings like those in Arizona from escalating to an everyday event we must have these laws but first the understanding that will create them.
When we arm ourselves and others with this wisdom as a law of gun ownership then guns are used little or never and only for good.
I accept your points on responsibility, but I'm having trouble getting my head around the idea of guns being used "for good".
I'm able (though reluctant) to stretch to "necessary" or "unavoidable" (as a means to aquire food for those of us still holding the morally shaky position of omnivores, perhaps), but "good"? Guns are for killing at a distance. We might be in a situation where we can see no other way, but that doesn't make it "good".
What did you have in mind? Victory over the Bad Guys or putting Johnny Foreigner in his place?
Forgive me if I sound frivolous.
T.A.
Excellent point.
I use my rifle to hunt for a deer or elk (sometimes both) in the fall season. I live in the mountains of Colorado. I would consider that I am using my rifle for a good purpose - feeding myself, friends and family very cheaply with lean and wonderful tasting meat that isn't a part of the horrible supermarket food chain. My grandfather taught me how to hunt for deer, fish and how to grow a garden as I was growing up. He passed on his knowledge of how to cheaply feed a family by using good hunting and gardening techniques (that is not saying he still went into town and went to the markets to buy grains, rice, coffee and other items). He would also use his rifle to protect the garden from little varmints. Not only did he pass on his knowledge... he passed on his hunting rifle to me when he was no longer capable of hunting. I am honored to have his rifle. I think it is a wonderful thing to be able to know how to provide food for your family.
BTW- I think sport hunting is ridiculous!! I only hunt for the food I will eat.
And, just because a vegetarian thinks that these hunting techniques that my grandfather taught me are a bad thing... doesn't make it so. I really scratch my head in wonder when somebody has the gall to try and tell me that the use of my rifle to provide part of my food necessities for myself is a bad thing. I think it highlights their self-righteous attitudes quite well... of course, they don't see it that way because they feel they are in the right, and I'm just a cruel person who kills a cute little deer or elk once a year. I try to mention how over population of deer up here is actually a problem... but they can't hear it because it is too hard for them to be wrong.
And, I'm guessing, but if the US supermarket food chain system does collapse (which is possible considering it REQUIRES oil to work) I am going to CHERISH the techniques my grandfather taught me as the folks who thought it was 'bad thing' to hunt for food starve.
Long post in answer to my reluctant "necessary", but you write well. I think I'd have liked your grandfather.
Hunting for meat is a much more tenable position than buying it from the supermarket and pretending that's where it comes from, but it still involves killing and I think that disqualifies it from being good. It may be necessary as a survival trait (as long as the ammunition shops don't close with the supermarkets) and I wish you well when the collapse comes.
The word "bad", though, was one of your own. It's not a case of being one thing or the other - there are alternatives to "good" and "bad". Remember "necessary"? Killing in order to live isn't intrinsically bad, but that doesn't make it good - or unregrettable.
Has a vegetarian been having a go at you? Let me know who it was - I'll have a word. Us morally shaky omnivores should stick together.
from the article:
~ The belief that to be an American is to be armed runs wide and deep. ~
there would be no America without the gun...
the gun created America...Americans were never exemplary, just armed and vicious...
the gun was used to kill those already living in this virginal paradise, then used to import and enslave yet another population to enrich the gunned, then used to kill any and all, especially former countrymen, on the heels of a nasty divorce to protect the newfound wealth of the gunned...
no wonder the American is wedded to the gun in our minds...
they are wedded...rather, the gun is our mother...we were born of her...a Son of a Gun...
the gun, of course, cheats around, even to this day, lover to all, loyal to none...so does the American government...
Good luck with that Robert, but the genie is out of the bottle and we might best be thinking about harm reduction in lieu of disarmament.
from the article:
~ And: "Our Founding Fathers understood that the guys with the guns make the rules." These are the words of National Rifle Association CEO Wayne LaPierre, speaking last year at the 2009 Conservative Political Action Conference.
An abundance of such commentary - logically limited but deeply embedded in our psychology - can be found on the "Insurrectionism Timeline" maintained by the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence in the wake of the 2008 Supreme Court decision (to which I was alerted by Brad Friedman). ~
how is Wayne LaPierre's statement 'logically limited'?
We need to disarm the State before we disarm people - that's what the 2nd Amendment is all about, regardless of how many people abuse this right, or how arcane you think this right may be.
There is no way that a few people killed by mindless nuts can compare to the millions killed by the MIC, or the hundreds of thousands of Americans abused and/or killed by the domestic militarized 'police' forces. Just because there are some people who have and use guns for the wrong purpose does not mean we should carelessly give up our last - and possibly most important - remaining right.
This isn't about 'being American' - I'm about the furthest from that you can get - but being pragmatic.
As for this latest atrocity - what about this guy's father, who let him go out and kill those people that day? I don't think my father would have done that - I think he would have killed on of his own children first, if that's what it took to stop a massacre. Parents aren't responsible for their children anymore - maybe you should start licensing them, and taking the children away from negligent parents.
As for me - I can't forget what the Nazis did to my family - all who had been disarmed by the Nazis, who went door-to-door with the gun registration lists and took their weapons away. Walk a mile in my shoes - or better yet, in theirs.
"We need to disarm the State before we disarm people"
armybrat, These are words the world can live by. It is past time to end the industrial manufacture of death tools. The arms race is a fools' race without winners. Far too many in the u.s. think "their" country is winning. This is a short sighted, narrow view toward life. If Peace on Earth is the goal, then it is counter productive to expend energy manufacturing violence.
In order to disarm this runaway State of insanity and inhumanity, the State must be dissolved. It will never self heal organically.
Peace and goodwill
Buck
nothing matters, gun or not,
when there's no real democracy,
when the authority works against people's will and interest,
when the people have no way to assert their power.