Most Popular This Week
- Not to Worry, Rape Victims Who Want An Abortion: We Won't Charge You With Felony Tampering With Evidence, Just Your Doctor
- The Non Zero-Sum Society: How the Rich Are Destroying the US Economy
- Obama Administration Compromise Would Implement No-Cost Birth Control
- The Right of the People, Even At the Airport
- To End Extreme Poverty, Let’s Try Ending Extreme Wealth
- The Non Zero-Sum Society: How the Rich Are Destroying the US Economy
- Don’t Put a Fork in It: On the Perils of Genetically Engineered Salmon
- Five Possibilities for the Next Great Progressive Push
- An Economic Alternative to Exploitative Free Market Capitalism
- To End Extreme Poverty, Let’s Try Ending Extreme Wealth
Popular content
Today's Top News
More Than Ten Good Things to Celebrate in a Bad Year
This year was marked by turmoil at home and abroad, including a deepening financial crisis that continues to leave millions jobless and homeless, as well as ongoing and expanding wars. But despite the setbacks and disappointments, here is a list of victories to be thankful for, starting with three inspirational women.
- On November 13, Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi was released from house arrest. In 1990 her party, the National League for Democracy, won the elections but the military junta refused to let them take power. Instead, Suu Kyi was kept under house arrest for almost 15 of the last 21 years. Her release brings great joy and hope to millions of people in Burma and supporters of democracy worldwide.
- Dilma Rousseff was elected president of Brazil and takes power on January 1. Dubbed by the media "the most powerful woman in the world," Rousseff was tortured and jailed for three years for opposing Brazil's military dictatorship. She later became Chief of Staff for the popular outgoing president and former metalworker, Lula da Silva, whose policies of growth with equity have helped pull millions of Brazilians out of poverty. While some worry about Rousseff's commitment to the environment (she was also Lula's Energy Minister), the fact that a progressive woman from the Labor Party will rule a powerhouse like Brazil is cause for celebration.
- Elizabeth Warren became "consumer czar." After the financial meltdown in 2008, Warren was appointed Chairwoman of the five-member Congressional Oversight Panel created to investigate the banking bailout and oversee TARP. She won tremendous public support by sharply criticizing the banks and calling for greater transparency and accountability. Warren advocated for a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to protect borrowers from abuses in mortgages, credit cards and other consumer loans. On September 17 President Obama named her special adviser by to oversee the development of this new bureau.
- The Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Chinese literary critic and professor Liu Xiaobo. Liu, a critic of China's one party state, was sentenced to 11 years in prison for drafting a petition calling for free speech and open elections. The Chinese government usually escapes rebuke for its oppressive practices because the country is such an economic superpower. But according to Amnesty International, some 500,000 Chinese prisoners are in detention without charge or trial. Harassment, surveillance, house arrest, and imprisonment of human rights defenders are on the rise, as is Internet and media censorship. Repression continues for Falun Gong practitioners and minority groups, including Tibetans, Uighurs and Mongolians. The Nobel Prize for Liu Xiaobo has helped expose China's dirty secrets.
- Speaking of exposing secrets, WikiLeaks has sent shock waves around the world by exposing the inner machinations of U.S. foreign policy. After a decade of illegal wars, lack of accountability, government secrecy and embedded journalists, WikiLeaks has given the public a much-needed look at the way the U.S. government continues-under President Obama-to cajole, bribe and strong arm other nations into supporting U.S. policies. We look forward to more revelations in 2011 and we hope more people will step forward to defend WikiLeaks and suspected whistleblower Bradley Manning!
- Don't Ask Don't Tell was repealed. The LGBT community has been fighting to repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell since it was first introduced as a compromise measure by President Clinton in 1993. In an historic Senate vote on December 18 the policy was repealed and then signed by President Obama on December 22. While some find it hard to celebrate the ability of more people to now fight in U.S. wars, let's remember that this victory will help the gay community win upcoming, more important struggles for marriage rights and equality in the workplace.
- U.S. troop levels in Iraq declined dramatically. While President Obama has presided over a disastrous surge of troops in Afghanistan, he does seem to be holding to his promise of ending the U.S. military presence in Iraq. The number of U.S. troops has declined from some 144,000 in January 2009 to roughly 50,000 today. The remaining troops are supposed to leave the country by the end of 2011. The U.S. invasion of Iraq, based on lies and resulting in the death and displacement of millions of Iraqis, is one of the most shameful episodes in our history. The sooner it ends, the better.
- The health care bill passed. No, it was not a single payer bill and it didn't even have a public option, disappointing many of its original supporters. But the bill does extend health coverage to over 30 million Americans who would have otherwise been uninsured; it stops private insurance companies from rejecting people for preexisting conditions; and it allows children to remain covered by their parents' insurance until the age of 26. Taken as a whole, it represents a progressive shift in U.S. social policy, which is why it is being so viciously attacked by the right. And from the left, the fight for a single payer system, especially on the state level, is far from over!
- The Senate ratified the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) between the U.S. and Russia. The New START provides modest reductions in the number of deployed strategic nuclear weapons, and includes monitoring and verification procedures. Unfortunately, to get Republican support the U.S. commitment to disarmament is countered by a new commitment to spend $180 billion over 10 years to "modernize" U.S. weapons and delivery systems. But not passing the treaty would have been disastrous. The new treaty will undoubtedly improve U.S.-Russia relations and will hopefully move us closer to the eventual elimination of nuclear weapons.
- In a little noticed automobile obituary, the last Hummer rolled off the production line on May 24 - a casualty of higher gas prices, the economic crunch and a shift in consumer preferences. The cool cars of today are no longer monstrous gas guzzlers but hybrid and electric cars. There are 28 hybrid models already on the market today. At least 12 plug-in electric cars are planned for 2011, kicking off a wave of new green vehicles.
And a few extras for good cheer:
- At the White House Tribal Nations Conference on December 15, President Obama announced that the United States would support the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The statement is significant because the United States was one of only four countries that voted against the declaration when the UN General Assembly adopted it in 2007, and the last of those four to have reversed its former opposition.
- In a policy reversal after the BP oil disaster, the Obama administration announced that it will not allow offshore oil drilling in the eastern Gulf of Mexico or off the Atlantic coast for at least seven more years. Meanwhile, offshore wind power is taking off from Maine to Georgia.
- Foreign private security contractors were banned by the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan, and Blackwater founder Eric Prince-hounded by lawsuits and bad press-felt compelled to sell the company and move out of the country.
- Thanks to California's Proposition 19, also known as the Regulate, Control & Tax Cannabis Act, the debate on failed Marijuana Prohibition has arrived! Despite not passing, 4 million people voted to control and tax marijuana, with endorsements coming from new allies from the SEIU to the NAACP to law enforcement groups.
- The government-supported student loan program was dramatically restructured, eliminating private banks and thereby ensuring that more money goes directly into the hands of low-income students.
I could keep the list going. It's an important reminder, as we go into what will be a very difficult new year, that people on all continents continue to struggle for a more peaceful, just, sustainable world. And as long as people keep organizing and mobilizing, there will be victories to celebrate.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


241 Comments so far
Show AllThanks! I needed that.
VP, not only do you deserve a big KUDOS so far but also your full reply to this article deserves to be combined into a followup article on this site. The title of this article should read
"Response to Medea's "Good" Things to Celebrate This Year"
Have it published on January 3, 2011 or January 4, 2011 if Hedges's next article comes that Monday. :)
P.S.: If medea is reading all this, it is possible that she will take all of this into consideration and apologize for insulting us.
I have met Ms. B. more than once, and i wouldn't hold my breath, Jennifer!
I totally agree with your post to VP however, and believe as well, that it should be published on this site.
rita
Medea might be representative of most of us working Americans including us here on CD in some ways. She fights and works hard but in the face of also feeling powerless against the system, she falls into trying to feign happiness when she writes such an article. For two years, we have been continuing in regression overall with 2 steps forward 7 steps backward. I think that Medea is hurt by the fact that the 2 steps forward are more than eclipsed by just 1 very bad step backward of 7 and yet like most Americans, she is not ready to let it out that failure, anger, and unhappiness is all over us. Since you know Medea well, I would be interested in knowing if I am correct in guessing why she writes an article as well as her reply in the manner she has written it in. Neither Jennifer, my niece btw, nor I want to go hard on Medea but I think that there is something deep that is preventing even the best progressive champions from letting out what is hurting them despite their best fighting efforts for better days ahead.
But the "two steps forward" cause the seven steps backward.
Criticizing a person's ideas is not "being hard" on them.
Anger and unhappiness and other emotions are not what is most important.
Progressives and liberals are unhappy because they cannot reconcile two antagonist and contradictory ideas: the hope that the system can be made to work and that there is a role for them in that - the two steps forward - and the reality that in so doing they are perpetuating the system - the seven steps backward. The personal angst over that has nothing to do with the conditions nor with effecting any political and social change, but rather with their own personal needs which are at odds with the needs of the suffering many and which are working against any progress. They are causing the things they claim to be fighting, and there is no way for them to meet their personal emotional needs without that being the case. Criticism of their ideas is then taken as a personal attack for that reason - the agenda is to satisfy personal emotional needs, not to effect social and political change.
If more people take those two steps forward too much for granted, then yes, those seven steps backward can be worse thanks to our foolish underestimating. Is that what you are implying? As for your talk on anger and unhappiness, I often think it is due to lack of self confidence, team confidence, or both. I think that each of us should be 50% individual and 50% team oriented. I hear that's how people think in Europe but I could be wrong.
It is my understanding that they are angry and unhappy for the reasons you mentioned. However, in the US there is a strong denial by the electorate whereas abroad, people are more open about it. 2011 and 2012 don't look promising either.
There is strong denial by the progressives and the activists.
The general public has no choices in elections that mean anything, and elections are never the cause of political and social change in any case.
The absence of a powerful and militant Left is not the fault of the general public, it is the fault of the progressive and liberal activists. Blaming the public is just a convenient excuse. Liberals and progressives are content to "speak truth to power" - an exercise in self-expression for self-centered purposes - while never actually challenging power and attacking any who do, and they are happy with their places in the existing power structure and do nit wish to see the boat rocked.
I do not blame the public for they are ill-informed with all of us being a part of it. I am mixed on your statement about blaming the activists. I could see where some activists are unable to appeal well enough to people outside the base and for that they might share a little blame. However, the media is also at fault for unfairly shutting them out while giving too much publicity to the rightwing activists such as Glenn Beck, Sarah, Palin, Tea Party, etc... . As much as I hate it, people depend on the news media of radio, tv, internet, and newspapers to help them know what is going on and to make decisions. On the one hand, I could agree that the activists could be better but if the media is undermining them hard enough, then it doesn't matter how good the activists are as long as they feel less confident that they will make a difference.
I am going to reply to your last post here, so we don't get the ever-narrowing column effect.
The media is not at fault, either. They are doing their job - defending and promoting their own interests, the interests of the wealthy and powerful. We are at fault if we naively expect anything other than that from them.
"Activism" doesn't work. It is about self-expression and begging rather than organizing and fighting back. It always inevitably gets co-opted, for example Sierra Club and the other major environmental groups "partnering" with BP for a "greener future," and then being completely silent during the Gulf catastrophe. The liberal and progressive organizations in structure are modeled after corporations, hierarchical and top-down and supposedly based on "meritocracy" based on credentials, and the methodology mimics corporate sales and marketing techniques. Successful activism is that which brings money into the organization - no different than a corporation. "Non profit" then becomes merely a sales point, a way to get people to part with their money. There is no accountability. we are to assume that it is sufficient that their "hearts are in the right place," and we are not to look for any results - other than to be made to feel good, which is what the article we are discussing here is about. failures can always be blamed on others - the media, the right wing, the tea party, the stupid general public, the corporate opposition.
None of that is an accident. The activists are promoting and defending the existing social arrangements and conventions, with a little "liberal" and "progressive" window dressing to fool people about that. The methods are not politically neutral - they are the agenda, they are the program.
It is quite a racket. And they seek a monopoly over any and all opposition to the rulers, which is why they will viciously attack anyone suggesting any other approach. This form of "activism" replaced organizing and resisting around 1970, and those running it seek first and foremost to prevent the old form of opposition - organizing and resisting - from returning. Every spark of militant or left wing talk must therefore be stomped out immediately before people can hear it.
Hear hear, VP's piece completely deserves to be it's own article! Well thought out! If VP doesn't, how about you quoting in an article JB?
Thank you VP for your in depth critique of Ms. Benjamin Medea. I am with you on this one.
When it comes to positive thinking I am very much thankful for Rebecca Solnet.
Thank you for taking the time for such a complete response. I had a lot of questions when I read Medea's list. I fail to see how the repeal of DADT is going anything except to get more bodies to send to the six wars (Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia and Colombia) the US is involved in without even tacit protection for those of who have a different sexual orientation. Before DADT, LBGT members of the military were hazed, brutalized and thrown out when convenient. It seems to me the same thing could happen again since the repeal included no protections. I fail to see how the repeal is going to change the mind of one Governor or CEO.
The health care bill is a bust. Those now covered are going to get junk policies that provide no protection from bankruptcy or denial of service. The penalty for doing so is so ridiculously small that it is cheaper for them to pay the fines than cover treatment. 20 million still have nothing.
I am grateful for WikiLeaks and I don't think they are going to be able to get this Genie back in the bottle. I'm not grateful for a President that is so corrupt that he goes after the media instead of the criminals. That he would rather ban free speech than fix what's so very wrong in his State Department.
There is so much institutionalized injustice and brutality, one doesn't know where to begin.
But the one thing I do agree with Medea on is that we can't give in to despair. It's the first weapon of despots. Reform has found a way in even worse circumstances and we will find our way, too.
Visiting Professor:
You have done a great job on this long response to Medea Benjamin! I don't know if I have ever seen a such a comprehensive and carefully-composed reply to an article on Common Dreams--it's about two or three times as long as the pieces that are usually published here.
I also like the tone of your comments. You want Medea Benjamin to know that you disagree with many of her points, but you use respectful language without any name-calling or histrionics. In fact, you were much nicer to her than she was to us when she told us to "continue to wallow in our negativity." That was a very insensitive comment, in my opinion. I mean, we're all hurting here.
At any rate, I hope that this is published as a complete piece on Common Dreams so that more people can read it. Does anyone know how to contact the editors to recommend this?
I like what you say about Warren. I think she is very popular because she has appeared with Colbert and Stewart a few times and they lauded her. Also, she was featured in michael moore's Capitalism, A Love Story movie.
I have had the same thoughts as you.
I'm not sure what the status is of private military contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan now. I thought they were still active in those two countries. Can somebody clarify this issue?
VP, please, keep 'em coming, and as another suggested, write your own piece!! I hope Medea is reading this...too much apologist rhetoric is being written these days, Thanks so much!
Obama broke the first promise he ever made when he promised to adopt a dog from a shelter. I heard this one over and over, and thought "wow! what a humane individual!" A few months later it was " oh, we forgot that one of the girls has an allergy " and so a fully trained Portugese Water Dog was added to the First Family.
Hypo-allergenic dogs are killed in shelters daily, and there are breed rescues for every breed. There was never any intention of keeping this or any of the promises you listed, VP, from how things look to me.
move
Why are CD editors posting a feel good story? Most of us CDers hate that kinda shit.
LOL! I thought the same thing. I wonder how long it will take until this discussion thread goes negative. My guess is it will happen before Noon EST.
Oh fellow CD'ers please prove me wrong!
You were not proven wrong NC Tom! And i am part of your worst fears... ;-)
rita
Before noon? It happened at 9:49.
That felt like a bit of an internet paper cut...
LOL myself. If there's one thing people hate on CD, it's anything that has the appearance of a ray of hope, a reason for cautious optimism, or the choice to look at the bright side of a mixed and complex issue.
My God, don't you realize that 100% of people who are born on this planet still die?! They die every day!! Until we can ensure that everybody on this planet lives happily ever after, we should remain angry, negative, and conspiracy-driven.
Which is also a spectacularly successful strategy for attracting new people with new, creative, problem-solving energy into the progressive camp, I understand.
Let the flaming begin!
... oops, it already has.
Admiring some of the decorations and deck-chair arrangements on the Titanic as it sinks does seem a bit flaky. I mean, the gravity of the situation...
Over the years I've watched a lot of talented and intelligent progressives and environmental activists burn out and give up the fight because the incessantly negative news finally wore them down, and weighed on them too heavily.
I know the same would happen to me if I didn't, from time to time, step off of the world-is-going-to-hell merry-go-round of negative news and seek out the glimmers of light among the darkness. Sorry, but that's just how I'm made ... otherwise I become a grouchy and cynical curmudgeon that no one wants to be around. Which means I accomplish nothing.
But it sounds like you are made of stronger stuff than I. Good for you. We're all different. Keep up the good fight.
I only encourage you not to jump to judgment about others just because they don't agree with you 100% of the time. That never works in an intentional community, in an activist organization, or in a marriage. (Regardless of how easy it is to do anonymously on the Web.)
And, just to set the record straight, I'm registered Green Party, not Dem.
If you will just believe it's true Then there is nothing you can't do There's not a mountain that you can't climb There's not a river you can't make it over There's no tomorrow that you can't find if you try I know you're gonna make it Nothing can stop you now!
Now this is the CD I've come to know and loathe. Posting a Democrapic puff piece, to help break up the monotony of the hundreds of shitty things to be angry about, is what we expect from the editors of CD. Thanks!
You should read in CD "Looking Back at 2010 by Grace Lee Boggs" "..."50% of African American males, ages 18-60, were unemployed." What a stunning news!
and some of the people of Afghanistan actually view the US and NATO as invaders!!!
Medea Benjamin is like a good bottle of wine that's been open to damn long and starts to turn bad. The Code Pink days of in your face activism were very much needed and thanks... but the recent exploits starting with unquestioning support for Obama, war is good for the women in Afghanistan, and the all-too-typical simplistic gibberish like the above is folly.
And her take on health care "reform" is embarrassing.
Agreed, bernie.
Good old Medea, still supporting obama and believing in the change she could believe in. Spare me, please.
readytotransform
To be fair, the Obamaites are simply channeling their commander-in-chief, who spent a near decade, from 2001 to 2009, pontificating on the illegality or superfluousness of the Patriot Act, renditions, tribunals, Predators, Guantanamo, and overseas wars, and then as president embraced or even expanded all of them.
Prospero Anno Nuevo!
Right on mightymite,
If he had simply fought but failed to enact change that would be forgivable, but it was the embracing thing ...
Ah yes -- negativity abounds. But, Newsmax and Fox do it so much better. Time for a change!
Liu --- funded by interventionist neocon Democracy Foundation
Rousseff ------ as Lula said to be bad for indigenous people.
Oilybombercare ------- barf! Up to triple premiums for overweight ( considered pre-existing condition)and over 55 years (appox. 27% of income).
Unconstitutionally Mandated approx.9% of income premiums which may rise yearly for the non preexisting conditions clients.
Service may still be refused albeit with monetary penalty.
Will Oilybomber vacate Iraq?
"overweight ( considered pre-existing condition)"
pre-flabricated?
Liu --- funded by interventionist neocon Democracy Foundation
-- oh
I usually appreciate Medea for what she writes but here are my biggest objections.
1. On #3, how long will Warren last and just what is she really getting for the position? So far, it looks like she will be relegated to being politically tied and toothless.
2. On #8, it was not health care at all. In fact, it was another disaster capitalism bomb mandating that we pay Big Insurance to continue to abuse us or pay Uncle Sam more money and get added to the "most wanted" list. There is no progress in any of that !
3. On #7, it has been said so many times that troops have been replaced with mercenaries and the disasters in Iraq have likely worsened without the American electorate being informed about it.
4. On #12, if the price of gas goes up, Obama will do exactly what he did in 2008. He will flip-flop and allow the drilling to continue.
5. On #13, how long will it be before Washington calls for another "regime change" after realizing that even those US-backed puppet regimes emerge out of their puppet status and show some true heart for their civilians whose lives are already long ruined?
6. On #14, "debates" always occur in CA and yet overturning prohibition always fails. Besides, even if the prohibition were repealed in CA, it would be null and void unless the federal prohibition were removed first.
7. On #15, why not just make those loans grants instead of loans?
I don't know as much about the weapons and what goes on between these nations but I trust nothing.
P.S.: As far as Russia is concerned, despite the government, the people there are great and you would love it enough to make you more than disgusted with this rotten nation.
Of all the metal that goes towards such destructive weapons, I can't help but wonder how much of it could instead go towards more constructive ideas such as improving public transportation and even expanding on it such as deep into the heartlands especially the depopulating rurals that get more depressing to look at year after year.
I was able to go to Russia because I had lost relatives who lived there who I had never met my entire life ! I am happy to hear about the Russian community in your city. Like most Europeans coming here, they don't expect much when they come.
I'm just relieved to know Elizabeth Warren is actually still alive, aren't you? Of course we have not seen or heard from her in months, so it's safe to assume she is being chained in a dungeon at the Federal Reserve undergoing re-education. Surely Ms. Benjamin knows that Obama had, on puppeteers' orders, strategically sidelined Warren months ago as an 'advisor', specifically in order to preempt and prevent her appointment as chairwoman of the very agency she conceived.
It would seem that Ms. Benjamin is not (yet) cynical enough to see such dastardly "strategery" for what it is. But, good Lord, if she sees the insurance racket ('healthcare') bill as an achievement, rather than the fascist Trojan horse that it is, then she joins the "professional left' in extreme credulity ... bordering on dishonesty.
And of course on drilling, it is only a question of 'WHEN' not 'IF' the price of gas goes up, then Obama will again fast-track deepwater drilling as he (thru Salazar) did specifically for BP's disastrous circumvention of safety regulations. Of course, the price of gas is rising predictably as we speak, and although the growth of wind-power is indeed encouraging, I have little doubt big oil will still hold sway over Obama. It gets what it pays for.
Yes, I am glad that Warren is still alive and making it through despite Obama holding her nomination up for so long while he got Elena Kagan to SCOTUS rather "quick". But for what you stated in the rest of that paragraph, it would have been a little more honest of Obama to just let her go. We will see what happens to her but I am not holding my breath.
I wrote to Elizabeth very early on when she was in COP, nothing ever happens. Just hot air. She will end up just like Harold Koh another criminal to the list.
I heard of Harold Koh and having compared his background and views to Warren, I would say that she is highly unlikely to stoop to his criminal level. I fear that she will be persecuted in a manner far worse than Van Jones for having a heart for consumer rights and protection.
Wrong, did you check Harold Koh credential? Impeccable, Dean of Yale Law School, an honest broker, former Harry Blackmun law Clerk, civil right advocates and a potential associate Supreme court Justices. How such a man would have advices Obama use domes to kill innocent civilians, just as John Yoon adviced Dubya on torture? BTW who is worst?
I give more credit to Warren's background of growing up in Oklahoma and being frugal and pro-family at heart. From what I read about Koh, some "conservatives" liked him and some didn't whereas with Warren, none of them treated her with any respect. Koh served in both Raygun and Clinton administrations before. Warren, on the other hand, was pro-family at heart throughout her career. Not a single "conservative" appreciated that. It took only 3 months after Obama nominated Koh to get him confirmed whereas Elizabeth Warren was dragged out for several months before finally getting a token "position" when in fact, Obama could have easily nominated her for SCOTUS instead of shamelessly choosing to replace John Paul Stevens with Elena Kagan !
We will wait and see, if she does turn out the way I see it or the way you envision. BTW, anyone expecting Associate Justices Elena Kagan to be like John Paul Stevens is in for a shock. Let hope she will not turn to be another Clarence Thomas! You seem to be a very strong supporter of Elizabeth, that’s OK with me but, hope you will not vote for Obama again!