EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Read All About It: Axed General Morphs into Self-Made Celeb
Let's consider for a moment the fates of two men who took unique paths in military life and whose careers were once intertwined: General David Petraeus, now our Afghan War commander, and his former subordinate General Stanley McChrystal, our former Afghan War commander before he became the first general since Douglas MacArthur to be axed by a president -- in his case, for a Rolling Stone version of "loose lips sink ships" (or administrations).
Petraeus, the most political U.S. general in memory, dusted off the failed counterinsurgency doctrine of the Vietnam era, made it bright and shiny again, built fabulous relationships in Congress and in militarized Washington think tanks, and then rode it all to the heights in Iraq and at U.S. Central Command. Now, in Afghanistan, without the slightest compunction, he's left his beloved counterinsurgency doctrine in a ditch as conditions on the ground worsen. Instead, he's called in the firepower and the propaganda, both in double measure. (Oh, and in case you hadn't heard, we've finally achieved glorious victory in the godforsaken village of Marjah in southern Afghanistan where a senior Marine general recently announced that the battle against the Taliban there is "essentially over." Huzzah!)
Thanks to such a string of dazzling "successes," Petraeus has scaled the heights of American celebrity. Just the other day, he reached Mount-McKinley-esque elevations (with Everest still ahead) when ABC's Barbara Walters declared him not just an "American hero" (though that, too), but the Most Fascinating Person of 2010! He topped a list which included Justin Bieber, Sarah Palin, and future British princess Kate Middleton, possibly because he has so much more bling than they do.
McChrystal might not seem such a happy story. Running teams of Special Operations assassins for years from the shadows in Iraq and Afghanistan -- hardly the sort of thing likely to lead to American celebrity -- he became Afghan War commander under Centcom commander Petraeus in 2009. The Taliban, however, seemed to surge faster than his forces did and he was even saddled with responsibility for approving Afghan peace talks with (and "goodwill payments" to) a Taliban impostor.
Then, of course, he presided over a group of hard-drinking aides, deeply frustrated by the war they were so unsuccessfully fighting, who mouthed off to that Rolling Stone reporter about the Obama administration, et voilà, he was out on his ear. Open to him, then, it seemed was only the usual grim route for retired generals: a quick trip through that fast-twirling military-industrial revolving door, pension in hand, to a lobbying job at an elevated salary with a defense contractor and maybe even a "senior mentorship" at the Pentagon.
But such a man was not Stanley McChrystal. Pulling himself up by his combat boot straps, he took another path. He started by accepting a post at Yale University teaching a seminar in "leadership"; then, he signed on with a "world class" speaker's bureau called Leading Authorities, and next thing you know he's on the talk circuit offering "Four-Star Strategy Lessons" for a fee that can hit $60,000 a pop (plus travel expenses and lodging for three).
Alright, it's not all glory as in Marjah. He does, for instance, have to grit his teeth and give the keynote address at the International Sign Association's Expo 2011. ("While the majority of our educational and networking events are directly related to the sign industry, Gen. McChrystal will offer valuable insight into leadership during difficult times," says ISA president Lori Anderson enthusiastically.) Nor does he always fill all the seats when he speaks, but this is what sacrifice is all about, right? And his message is surely invaluable. To wit:
"One of the things I learned about communications is you need to keep it very direct, very straightforward, simple, and you need to be repetitive with it. People need to hear a consistency in your message over time. Don't worry about trying to say something dramatically different every time you talk to people because if they hear the same message enough times it's actually very reassuring that you are consistent in the direction you're trying to take the organization."
Think of Stanley McChrystal, then, as the military version of a self-made celebrity in a world where, as Lewis Lapham writes in "Sweet Celebrity," image rules. Next year Barbara Walters?
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

6 Comments so far
Show Allyou need to be repetitive
you need to be repetitive
Public Law 107-40 started an unwinnable and insane DAFT war.
There is no success.
There is no end to 'preventing future terrorism' by our present and future enemies.
Public Law 107-40 should not be ignored.
We end it, and we end this insanity.
We don't end it, and it will end us.
"Stop using conservative language"
Stop the DAFT war.
These wars are crimes against humanity. CRIMES ARE STILL CRIMES NO MATTER WHO IS RUNNING THE SHOW!!! End the wars NOW. The evil fiends of the military industrial congressional complex have turned our fine young men and women into WAR CRIMINALS!!! Hows that for being all you can be? All you can be is a WAR CRIMINAL. Disobey all laws of this land. If Cheney can do anything, so can the rest of us. DISOBEY ALL LAWS UNTIL BUSH AND CHENEY ARE SUBJECT TO THE LAW!
Respectfully disagree. Those fine young men and women volunteer to be war criminals. They may be uneducated or just poor but they all to willingly sign up. Anyine with a brain has to know those wars are bogus. I do wish they would tour a VA hospital first. They are not heros either. They are murderers. How can they think invading a country is right? Killing people who are defending their homes. Do they ever stop to think what they would do if another country invaded us? Nite raids and breaking down doors to me says they are cowards. I do not feel sad when they are killed. The US has killed 9 MILLION people since 1898. Biggest terrorist group on the planet.
Now how about all those generals that had a contract with the US Government moving their company outside the US so they didn't have to pay taxes. Real American heros. My ass v
McChrystal is just another whore for the MIC. As is Gates, McMullen all the Joint Chiefs and way to many to count. People who say they want their country back are also idiots. Their country stole it from the Indians.
Sooner the US dies the better. But they will take another 10 million or more lives first. After they prop up more brutal regimes. Or do a few more coups.
decent summation pretty much
totally agree
but 99% are clueless
deck the halls 'n' shit, y'know?
Gah, these cookie-cutter generalissimos. One loses his job, ten more off the assembly line are waiting to take his place. What makes these mediocrities think that they're leaders? But the same can be said of corporate executives.
Don't forget that Patreus and McChrystal are grossly incompetent, but no one wants to admit it. Think of the climate when they went to West Point -- Viet Nam blazing, all the smart kids opposed to it, and all the smart kids shunning the military. Only the dumbest went into the military then, and the same remains true today.
I would like to link the tax cut deal to this thread. I believe that the tax deal shows that Obama has adopted the republican world view, which means he will attack Iran before the spring of 2012.
The question becomes, "What will Iran do?" I don't know, but if I ran the Iranian military, I would attack Ras Tanura (the biggest oil tanker sea port in the world and only a few short miles from the Iranian border). Google it. They would bring the world to its knees. But Patreus and his "brain" trust won't think of that in planning their attack.