EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Club Med for Recreational Bombing
I mean, you couldn't make this stuff up. In fact, if I were to offer a conspiracy theory to explain it, I might suggest that the U.S. government now exists mainly to feed material to The Daily Show. I'm referring to an article in the New York Times reporting that "the Obama administration and the Department of Defense have ordered the hundreds of thousands of federal employees and contractors not to view the secret cables and other classified documents published by Wikileaks and news organizations around the world unless the workers have the required security clearance or authorization."
Don't laugh. No, really, stop it!
Honestly, it's perfectly sensible. Secrecy being such an all-encompassing value for our government, why shouldn't its employees work in the dark, even when the rest of us, the rest of the world, knows what's going on. Fortunately, I'm not an employee of the U.S. government or its military-industrial contractors; so, though Raytheon, the Library of Congress, and other places have been thoughtful enough to try to minimize the pain of the ongoing Wikileaks dump of State Department documents by blocking people from reading them, and the Obama administration and assorted Internet crews, including Amazon and PayPal, are trying to ensure that there won't be a fourth, fifth, or sixth round of dumps, I've been wandering the Web like any 12-year-old reading around.
You want to know what struck me? Something small. And it happened in Yemen, that anything-goes country whose president Ali Abdullah Saleh gave Washington almost carte blanche to act militarily -- "an open door on terrorism," as he put it to Obama's Deputy National Security Adviser John Brennan in September 2009 (according to one of the State Department documents Wikileaks released). More like an open bomb bay, actually. And Saleh was even eager to take credit for those bombs we were dropping. "We'll continue saying the bombs are ours, not yours," he told then-Centcom commander General David Petraeus last January.
In return for the right to drop bombs and launch missiles, the Yemeni president got his own "open door" -- directly into the U.S. Treasury: tons of money (it's euphemistically called "aid") shoveled his way, U.S. trainers and training for his troops, and lots of fancy military equipment because, let's face it, Washington is still laboring in a coalition-of-the-billing, not a coalition-of-the-willing world. Still, even for Saleh, there were limits and -- it's so Washington 2010 of us -- we nonetheless tried to exceed them. According to that State Department document, Petraeus evidently wanted to get U.S. troops -- probably Special Operations forces -- on the ground in combat areas with Yemeni units. According to a State Department observer, "Saleh reacted coolly, however, to the General's proposal to place USG [U.S. Government] personnel inside the area of operations armed with real-time, direct feed intelligence from U.S. ISR [Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance] platforms overhead."
In other words, anywhere we have a foot in the door of war, the next thing you know we're trying to slip a (uniformed) body through it as well. That catches the American way of war these days and helps explain why we always seem to end up more, not less involved, in conflict in distant lands. Among the places where the U.S. offers big dollars for the right to blast the hell out of things, Yemen is actually a Johnny-come-lately. Only recently have American officials made Sana'a, its capital, a Club Med for recreational bombing.
On the other hand, ever since Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage marched into the office of Pakistani autocrat General Pervez Musharraf soon after the 9/11 attacks and reportedly told him that the U.S. would bomb his country "back to the Stone Age" unless he joined the fight against al-Qaeda, that country has been a magnet for Washington's top brass, military and civilian. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Admiral Mike Mullen had visited 16 times by early 2010 and sometimes there seems to be a greater density of American officials, wheedling, bribing, threatening, cajoling, and maneuvering in Islamabad, the Pakistani capital, than in Washington itself.
Meanwhile, the CIA's drones have been attacking Pakistani territory, its helicopters crossing the border shooting, its Special Operations troops on the ground, and the CIA swarming, as Washington acts with relative impunity in that land. As Fatima Bhutto, author of the epic memoir, Songs of Blood and Sword, about her father, a Pakistani member of parliament killed by police in 1996 while his sister, Benazir Bhutto, was prime minister, points out in her latest piece "A Flood of Drone Strikes," the American war in Pakistan is also functionally a war against Pakistan.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



18 Comments so far
Show AllIt's all down the Memory Hole, citizen.
And how many times did candidate Obama tell us how transparent government would be if he got elected ???
Team Obama has been transparent only when the ACLU or some other organization has sued them for failing to be transparent.
Not to mention:
US warplanes bomb central Iraq
07 December, 2010 11:31:00 MRS/TG/HRF
US fighter jets have reportedly pounded a region in Iraq's central governorate of Babil months after Washington declared an end to combat operations in Iraq late August.
Iraqi security sources said that on Monday, US warplanes shelled a region lying north of the provincial capital of Hilla, Aswat al-Iraq news agency reported.
“A number of US jets pounded this afternoon al-Buhayrat region, al-Askandariya district," said a security official, noting that Iraqi authorities had not been informed about the operation.
“The attack could targeted some armed cells in the region,” he added.
It was not clear if the airstrike had left any casualties.
The US involvement in a military operation comes despite the expiry of the mandate of US combat troops in war-torn Iraq at the end of August.
Upon the expiry, Washington withdrew its troops from the Iraqi soil after seven years of military presence in the country, but left some 50,000 US troops for what it calls "training and advising" purposes.
The Monday airstrike is not the first time the US forces have engaged in a military operation in Iraq after the August expiry.
On September 6, US troops engaged in a gun battle in the Iraqi capital of Baghdad, opening fire on suspected militants, who were believed to have entered an Iraqi military complex in the center of the capital city.
More than 12 people were killed and dozens more left injured during the attack.
Also in September, US and Iraqi forces launched a joint operation in Fallujah which resulted in the deaths of at least seven civilians.
http://www.military-world.net/Iraq/4692.html
How many times in 2010 did Obama tell us that there are no more combat operations in Iraq ???
I'm sure that if the odious Robert Gibbs were confronted with this contradiction, he would wiggle away by either showing that Obama's exact words could be interpreted differently, and that Obama never abolished this particular type of military assistance, OR Gibbs would dredge up some bureaucratic classification in which airstrikes are somehow NOT considered "combat operations".
In short, Team Obama would retreat from the contradiction using defense mechanisms that combine the ink-billowing of the squid with the slippery slime trail of the slug.
OS - nice metaphor...
But I perfer the more direct... "Obama is a lying piece of shit" - as is the entire gov't complex for many decades now.
Cute metaphor does not do the facts justice!
I know someone whose son is a helicopter pilot in Iraq and according to him it's business as usual there for U.S. troops, nothing has changed, U.S. troops are still engaged and obviously their is no need for reporters to be in Iraq because nothing is going on.
I can't help but wonder how many full-blown wars are happening that we haven't even heard of. I have a friend who is a colonel in the Air National Guard in charge of military police for his unit. He often travels to foreign lands for months at a time and always tells us that he cannot tell us where he has been. This leads me to believe it is places other than Iraq or Afghanistan. I've talked to many other soldiers who freely tell me where they have been and how many times they have been there.
This is, quite literally, horribly funny:
Army Calls For Increased Body Armor For Troops In Syria
http://www.theonion.com/articles/army-calls-for-increased-body-armor-for-troops-in,18601/
Iraq? What's Iraq?
You mean "Happy Land"?
Neverland?, never a word of truth about, from or about there.Although, Happy Meals make for a Happy Land.
OK, Professional Left, let's hear you keep defending the Trojan Administration on this one.
You people are bending yourselves into contortions trying to keep the Democrats, and their brave new leader, seeming legit.
Get over it. Same old warmongers and anti-transparency goons as the other guys.
Some of these independent radio talk-show hosts who used to actually be voices I respected fighting vs. the Bush administration... they've come out recently as just more servile mouthpieces shilling for Obama.
They've lost my respect, now that I know them to be no more than prostitutes begging for the other side of the duopoly coin.
SEASONAL HO HO HO
IMO, the US government telling its employees not to look at something on the Internet has an amusing precedent. Sorry if you don't think so, too.
After WW2, the Hollywood film industry began to face constant interference in movie making by the Catholic League of Decency. They demanded early access to screenplays in order to voice objection, before the film reached any silver screens.
In 1947, the CLOD threw a fit about the upcoming movie titled =Miracle On 34th Street=. They did not like that Doris Walker (Maureen O'Hara) was a divorcee, and mother of Susan (Natalie Wood), who re-marries at the end of the film. They demanded of the Producer, William Perlberg, that Doris be either 1) an Aunt of Susan, or 2) a War Widow. To back up their =request= they threatened boycott.
Perlberg told CLOD where to stuff it, and followed the screenplay verbatim. Francis Cardinal Spellman reported this nose thumbing to his friend and master, Pope Pius XII. So it was, for Catholics, that attending the 1947 movie was declared a venial sin, also the non-confession of having done so. My Protestant parents took me to see the movie in Manhattan. I was shocked to see Angharad from =How Green Was My Valley=.
Okay, as you were.
Trylon
Trylon -
My friend, you have your nose burried a bit too deep in the gin bottle for the holidays.
Your Jews vs Jesus analogy re the Hollywood Jewish Gestapo was a non-starter.
Why not just state what is on your mind without the 'magical mystery tour' you seem determined to take us on?
Let's pretend that I get what I want for Xmas. Okay? Thanks.
Public Law 107-40 gets repealed! Repealed, revoked, overturned, burned at the stake, drawn and quartered.
Rep. Barbara Lee (the only one to vote against this monstrosity of legislation) has called for its ending. Support her efforts.
The President would no longer have the authority to send US military forces anywhere he pleases (in order to 'prevent future terrorism' ad infinitum, ad nauseum).
The Rethuglicans and other political opportunists could impeach him for his unconstitutional behavior, if he were to continue to surge US forces anywhere there are/might be/imagined to be, potential future terrorists.
Imagine how politicians would use this for their personal advantage, to attack the President with.
I suggest that the way to end this insanity is to give our reptile-brained and feckless political mis-leaders a personal incentive.
-----------
As a substitute gift:
In line with the article by G. Lakoff about re-framing, I'll say again that we need to win the linguistic battle in order to win the war (the war to end the war).
Please use:
DAFT - Defense against Future Terrorism
instead of MIC-terms invented by Bush minions.
To President O'Bushka: Read My Lipka.
Our tax dollars at work, If it wasn't for killing Yemeni and Pakistani with remote controlled drones we couldn't have Obama Care. It's the way taxation works: war and welfare, love and marriage, all go together like a horse and carriage; this I'll tell you brother, you can't have one without the other.
“We have become a Nazi monster in the eyes of the world-a nation of bullies and bastards who would rather kill than live peacefully. We are not just Whores for power and oil, but killer Whores with hate and fear in our hearts. We are human scum and that is how history will remember us.” (Hunter S. Thompson)
Couldn'ta said it better meself. (Couldn't say it nearly so well meself.)