Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The FBI Successfully Thwarts Its Own Terrorist Plot
The FBI is obviously quite pleased with itself over its arrest of a 19-year-old Somali-American, Mohamed Osman Mohamud, who -- with months of encouragement, support and money from the FBI's own undercover agents -- allegedly attempted to detonate a bomb at a crowded Christmas event in Portland, Oregon. Media accounts are almost uniformly trumpeting this event exactly as the FBI describes it. Loyalists of both parties are doing the same, with Democratic Party commentators proclaiming that this proves how great and effective Democrats are at stopping The Evil Terrorists, while right-wing polemicists point to this arrest as yet more proof that those menacing Muslims sure are violent and dangerous.
What's missing from all of these celebrations is an iota of questioning or skepticism. All of the information about this episode -- all of it -- comes exclusively from an FBI affidavit filed in connection with a Criminal Complaint against Mohamud. As shocking and upsetting as this may be to some, FBI claims are sometimes one-sided, unreliable and even untrue, especially when such claims -- as here -- are uncorroborated and unexamined. That's why we have what we call "trials" before assuming guilt or even before believing that we know what happened: because the government doesn't always tell the complete truth, because they often skew reality, because things often look much different once the accused is permitted to present his own facts and subject the government's claims to scrutiny. The FBI affidavit -- as well as whatever its agents are whispering into the ears of reporters -- contains only those facts the FBI chose to include, but omits the ones it chose to exclude. And even the "facts" that are included are merely assertions at this point and thus may not be facts at all.
It may very well be that the FBI successfully and within legal limits arrested a dangerous criminal intent on carrying out a serious Terrorist plot that would have killed many innocent people, in which case they deserve praise. Court-approved surveillance and use of undercover agents to infiltrate terrorist plots are legitimate tactics when used in accordance with the law.
But it may also just as easily be the case that the FBI -- as they've done many times in the past -- found some very young, impressionable, disaffected, hapless, aimless, inept loner; created a plot it then persuaded/manipulated/entrapped him to join, essentially turning him into a Terrorist; and then patted itself on the back once it arrested him for having thwarted a "Terrorist plot" which, from start to finish, was entirely the FBI's own concoction. Having stopped a plot which it itself manufactured, the FBI then publicly touts -- and an uncritical media amplifies -- its "success" to the world, thus proving both that domestic Terrorism from Muslims is a serious threat and the Government's vast surveillance powers -- current and future new ones -- are necessary.
Read the full article at Salon.com.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



75 Comments so far
Show AllSo, the FBI creates work for itself to justify its existence?
What a revolting development...
that has been their reson d'etre from the beginning.
Right from their glorious origins in the Palmer raids of 1920, when J. Edgar Hoover made his first bones.
"raison d'être"
See comment 17
How astute of you!
Interesting that the FBI foiled this latest terrorist plot just as the criticism over TSA "pat-downs" was getting louder and louder....
BINGO!
The FBI has been using this same entrapment tactic to catch so-called sexual predators on the internet. In many instances they will pretend to be an underage person to seduce someone older or they will actually create child porn websites and then arrest anyone who downloads content from it. I'm sure they use the tactic on drug users too. I would not be surprised to learn that there are actually FBI agents who pretend to be drug dealers who arrest anyone who tries to buy from them.
It's entrapment and it's wrong, but they get away with it.
Absolutely.
It is wrong, and in these cases the cops should be charged as accomplices.
Your comment hadn't yet been posted or I wouldn't have bothered to say much the same below.
Bait cars, another example of make work by law enforcement to justify budget increases.
So we have a U.S. government entity that planned a terrorist attack against the United States and recruited an individual to carry it out.
Um....I'm sorry, but isn't that just about the ultimate definition of the word "treason" one could possibly come up with?
Oh, wait...the planners then arrested the person they recruited to carry it out. So it's all good.
Um.....how do you like your fascism? I prefer mine really overt and blatant, dressing on the side.....
"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross."
What a nation of cowardly ignoramuses we are!
Tony Vodvarka
Security by Monty Python.
Precisely . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_ueY4REpCs
"It seemed a bit daft, me havin' to guard him when he's a guard."
Glenn,
Oh ye of little faith....
.....but a lot if insight!!!
Shades of the days of the FBI Cointelpro ops.
You forgot that the timing is also fortuitous to the FBI request before the Congress to expand its surveillance without need for any authorization.
These made up emergencies happen whenever they need to foist the latest (ever so profitable) security measures upon the US populace.
My fellow readers with an understanding of how an empire plays on the "young and disaffected" for their our self-fulling purposes...The is just the tip of the iceberg before the impending collision with the masses. Truth will make us all free.
Thank you Brother Glen for posting the legal shenanigan's of our empire in actions of fear...
Thank you Glenn for bringing forward this important point. Who is this young man, what's his history. We he be allowed to speak? Is he an impressionabe teenager befriended and rewarded emotionally or tangibly? And if he does hate our foreign policy, well that's a pretty understandable position and not a crime. Yet.
Whether creating plots, or allowing plots to move forward, even to the point of facilitating, is standard practice. But this is purely for propaganda, and attention needs to be paid to it.
From the initial reports it does sound like a firehouse arson operation — firemen starting fires so they can put them out.
Sadly, it seems part of a larger national trend, an Orwellian one really, of not just the FBI, but of other police forces increasingly facilitating criminal activity to assure easy arrests.
Great fun to see a Republican senator get set up in a Minneapolis mens' room, and also comical to think the public good requires a veteran cop, a police sergeant, to be paid to sit all day on a public toilet with his pants down in hopes of encouraging a morals violation.
But the ugly reality of sting operations, whether for national security or victimless crimes, is it's doubtful there would have been a crime if the police hadn't instigated one — that in itself should be a criminal act.
These aren't sting operations though. A sting operation is completely legal. It becomes entrapment when the crime is encouraged by the the undercover agents and they supply the means to commit a crime. What you are talking about in the mens' room is entrapment because it actually encourages the crime and supplies a victim.
A sting operation would be going undercover to find out if someone is selling drugs. Now if they actually gave the suspect drugs to sell, then it would be entrapment.
Thanks.
Important difference. I didn't know that.
I thought that these phony FBI entrapments were the brainchilds of the Cheney/Bush crowd to keep the gullible public scared, then relieved that our firm jawed, steely eyed FEDS had saved us. What is so scary is that so many juries have actually convicted so many of the losers that the FBI entrapped. These entrapments have continued after Obama came into office. Some of the really stupid convictions were the one who was going to cut the cables on the Brooklyn Br4idge with a blow torch. The jury seemed so dense that they didn't ask how the person would be able to do it without being seen and how it would be almost impossible for a man to cut those huge cables. In one case the US Attorney had to get three juries before they found one so gullible they would convict the "entrapees". The judges in all these cases should instruct the jury to consider if the "entrapees" would have been willing or capable of carrying out the deadly deed if not given lots of encouragement, money, and technical support by the FEDS.
Thank You, Glenn Greenwald. We all need to question authority, and I love the title of the column, too.
What if innocent people had actually been killed, had their "brilliant" plan gone awry? Who would bear the blame?
How would it be spun, for spun it would be.
Or covered up.
Or shrugged off as necessary sacrifices for the "war on terror", with the appropriate speeches, testimonials, monuments. Fox coverage.
Aren't you all sick of this?
"What if innocent people had actually been killed, had their "brilliant" plan gone awry? Who would bear the blame?"
That's easy. Somalia. Then the US would attack it, seizing its oil in the process.
You see clearer than most.
Hey Glenn Greenwald, check this out:
"Five years ago, Portland became the first city in the nation to withdraw from the FBI-led [Joint Terrorism] task force."
So Portland decided that it didn't want to invite the Gestapo to meddle in the city's affairs.
Gee, I wonder why the Gestapo chose Portland as the best place to fabricate its crime. And the timing fits right in with the Fox "news" War Against Christmas narrative.
And you now what? It might have worked!
"Portland Mayor Sam Adams and Police Chief Mike Reese have discussed for months whether Portland should rejoin the Joint Terrorism Task Force, a multi-agency group that investigated Friday's failed plot to set off a bomb downtown."
Adams said. "If I believe there is a compelling public safety reason to change Portland's existing relationship with the JTTF, I will not hesitate to propose one to the City Council."
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/11/portland_mayor_police_chief_di.html
I think you have found the reason. At least they didn't give him a live bomb.
Silence is Consent.
chaokoh -
Nice contribution on your part to this recent mainstream news cycle flappette, linking terrorist plots thwarted by the ever-vigilant FBI to the annual make believe war on Christmas, and then to the city of Portland's near calamitous disengagement from a federal/state/local Joint Terrorism Task Force. The evil doer now in custody awaiting justice supposedly was targeting an annual tree lighting ceremony in a politically progressive region of the country in order to maximize the number of innocent children who would be killed. I frankly prefer the way your post connects the dots.
The FBI/DOJ press release, and Sunday's New York Times front page account of this latest jihadi-of-the-month-club arrest, quoted an official spokesman named Arthur Balizan reassuring a worried public that despite the elaborate, drawn out nature of the FBI's successful sting operation "at every turn, we denied him the ability to actually carry out the attack."
Whew! Close call! Instead of a buy/bust operation typical of drug cases where undercover cops pose as dope sellers, this was an adroitly orchestrated bomb/bust operation.
There is actually a school of thought in some law enforcement circles (and in some professional espionage circles) that instigating intricate conspiratorial activity through snitches and double agents, followed by a great public fanfare following arrest, scares off and deters wannabe criminals, thereby making us all safer in the long run. I've always thought this theory was fundamentally bullshit.
Anyway, too bad that special agent Balizan wasn't on the Bush/Cheney/Tenet/Rumsfeld team during August and the first ten days of September, 2001.
Bill from Saginaw
At least that knuckle-headed teenager can count on three squares, a roof over his head, and access to health care- that's better than can be said for millions of Americans who aren't foolish enough to fall into an FBI trap.
I still remember when the "drug war" was instituted, and the authorities began to train and hire people to "narc' on others. To me, the so-called "narcs" were much worse than the drug users, and others involved with drugs, and not just from a moral standpoint, but also from a legal framing of the issues. For the "narcs" it was OK to break the laws. And, all of these policies continue -- and are intensified in order to justify the war on terror as it spreads around the world, perpetrated by MIC, U.S. corporations, the U.S. government -- Republicans and Democrats as well, etc.
Greenwald is like a playwright creating a tragicomic farce of a confederacy of dunces suffering paranoid delusions. This can’t possibly be real, can it? Which act is this, and when is the curtain call?
that's why he's smart enough to live in Brazil.
i heard an official, i suppose it was someone with the fbi say on NPR this morning, "that at no time was the public in danger". That seemed to me complete admission that the whole affair was a setup.
Well TSA, you can back off now! It appears that the most recent "terrorists" are going back to the Tim McVeigh "home grown variety" vehicle acts.
Haven't the last 2 bizarro acts been with motor vehicles? The NY one and now Portland?
Vans and SUVs are now to be suspect, EVERYWHERE! Will the local police soon begin fondling the lines at Motor Vehicle registration?
Apparently too, it's such a bad world world economy that plane tickets are much too expensive for even the "terrorists." Let's ban that icky polluting fertilizer too, especially that one called 'Round Up." Who named that one, ICE?
The government has been known to infiltrate all kinds of groups, including environmental ones, and hoping to incite anarchy. Doesn't this affect your credibility?
Wouldn't it have been more positive, FBI to stop the kid once he was e-mailing to those he thought were terrorists? ( if that was even true) You all should see that video 'Scared Staright," and work in that area. Wouldn't the e-mails have been enough proof of some anti-American thinking? Was street theatre so necessary?
There have been several drug dealing cases where the FBI "evidence" was thrown out because they actually provided the house and all the drug making condiments. Wasn't that a lesson to you?
U.S. Government you are walking a very fine line, as many do not trust much of what you say. One poster has said that Portland told the FBI, thanks but no thanks, and now we have this? That is a very interesting conundrum to find; what is true anyway and who can we believe?
Oh, John Cleese, please make a world wide video called, 'Scared Smart," as maybe humor could permeate the global miasma. Oh, and FBI. please don't tell us that this is Bradley Manning's fault too! If he could do ALL of the wikileaks work and this, well, then there really is a Superman, and what do we need you for?
You have to remember that the FBI and CIA agents are getting younger and younger and only have TV DRAMA to work with. They cannot read and they wouldn’t know a good plot of a book if it were plopped down in front of them. So then, we are at the mercy of their lousy street theater. The well informed can always see through it.
So…from the front row seats and with the rest of the audience who are paying attention….I am throwing lots of rotten vegetables at the “stage”.
Another note:
The Islamic Center in Corvallis where he was a student and lived was torched last night.
Any bets on the perpetrators?
Just a fine case of FBI Blow-back...nothing more here...move along...nothing more to see...
And don't worry, the FBI ARE on this case.
Let's see, 911 they solved in 2 hrs, they will HAVE to have this solved by midnight 2050.
Like private prisons, terrorism is a growth industry. How long before spy agencies are completely privatized?
In criminal law, entrapment is constituted by a law enforcement agent inducing a person to commit an offense that the person would otherwise have been unlikely to commit. In many jurisdictions, entrapment is a possible defense against criminal liability. However, there is no entrapment where a person is ready and willing to break the law and the government agents merely provide what appears to be a favorable opportunity for the person to commit the crime. Government agents entrapped him if three conditions are fulfilled:
1. The idea for committing the crime came from the government agents and not from the person accused of the crime.
2. Government agents then persuaded or talked the person into committing the crime. Simply giving him the opportunity to commit the crime is not the same as persuading him to commit the crime.
3. The person was not ready and willing to commit the crime before the government agents spoke with him.
-Wikipedia
I once met someone who claimed to be a member of the Socialist Equality Party. She invited me to several events and I attended a few. She then tried to persuade me to join but insisted that I had to sign a document calling for among other things the overthrow of the government using force if necessary. I objected to signing it because I am not an advocate of violence. She argued that our nation was founded in a violent revolution and that force may be necessary. I said, “You may be right about that, but I am not signing any paper calling for violent overthrow of the government.” We parted ways to this day.
Later on, someone else claiming to be from their organization called me soliciting funds (material support?) in exchange for a book on Marxist philosophy, and also touched on the topic of revolution.
I still read their website, wsws.org, but I am not certain whether the people I dealt with were really SEP members or posers working to getting me to sign something I wouldn’t have dreamed of signing on my own. I always wondered if government agents were trying to entrap me. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were.
Yes, people who advocate effective militant action for change on the US left always get accused of being FBI agent-provocateurs.
So you aren't willing to believe that at some point, armed struggle may be needed? When has a capitalist ever made any concessions by mere appeals to be "nice"?
Just because somebody believes that violent revolution may be necessary in this country, doesn't mean that they should be foolish enough to put that in writing and sign it. I have no doubt that this was an attempt by somebody to set him up, for possible arrest or maybe blackmail. I would see nothing wrong in working to ovethrow the government if there were a fascist takeover in this country. As would any patriotic American. (Typos corrected in editing)
Thank you old commie. I am with you, only a fool would sign it. And old friend, we basically do have a fascist takeover in this country. When the people finally get that and take to the streets to protest in mass I will be there with them.
I say no to signing a confession and sitting in jail while everyone else is busy watching TV or shopping at the mall. Why the hell should I? So they can arrest and parade me in front of the news cameras as a so-called homegrown terrorist? Yeah right, I am sure they would like that.
SaboCat, you don't need to convince me about that. Now, if you would like to sign a piece of paper calling for the violent overthrow of the government let me know and I'll ask them to email you one. Put your money where your mouth is.
A.....are you FBI and can I see your credentials?
It's easy to spot an FBI agent. When Hoover ran the bureau, he instituted a policy, still in effect today, where all FBI men have to shave their legs.
"Yes, people who advocate effective militant action for change on the US left always get accused of being FBI agent-provocateurs."
That is because it is so frequently true.
We should be thankful that the FBI conducted this sting operation. If the CIA had done it, they would have used a real bomb.
John Mitchell, I fully agree for once.
If the FBI had been in charge of monitoring the alleged 9/11 coconspirators in the weeks immediately preceding the attack on the WTC, there may have been less chance of tragic loss of life.
Running a successful sting operation with snitch informants on the inside and surveillance teams on the outside is an art form of sorts. For all their shortcomings, follies, and Caucasian right wing political slant, the fact of the matter is that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has a shitload more institutional expertise when it comes to running a sting than the CIA, the DIA, the NSA, and the rest of the Homeland Security alphabet soup all put together.
I've always NOT believed that Colleen Rowley got hung out to dry up in the Minneapolis FBI field office on her simple request to take a look at Moussaouia's laptop because of risk averse incompetence by the FBI's DC beltway upper echelon bureaucracy (as the official 911 narrative claims). I think she and the Minneapolis office got stiffed because the FBI (and those pesky lawyers lurking over at the Justice Department) were deliberately kept out of the loop by the Bushies, largely for ideological, power-political reasons. This Al Qaeda plot was gonna be an act of war. So let's put the military and the CIA (and the CIA's cooperating foreign intelligence services such as the Pakistani ISI) in charge, and marginalize Mr. Hoover's boys - even though the threatened impending attacks were to take place on American soil, with innocent civilian lives at risk.
Other than a leak which tips off the bad-guy targets that it's a set up, the biggest risk inherent in running a successful sting operation is getting double crossed and burned by your own inside snitch informant. Despite its own foibles, failures, and police state mentality excesses, the FBI (and a few sophisticated state drug enforcement teams) generally have better training, better safeguards in place, and much more experienced control officers running their surveillance teams, than the spooks or the soldiers do.
No shit, with a non-FBI team in charge, some asshole might decide it would be cool to use a real bomb, since we're certain to bust all the evil doers anyway.
Bill from Saginaw