Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Worse Than Obama's Kill List? American Support for It
- States Take On GMOs in Battle Over Labeling
- Nearly 50 Climate Activists Arrested Outside Obama's White House
- Genetically Engineered Meat, Coming Soon to a Supermarket Near You
- DOJ Kill List Memo Forces Many Dems Out of the Closet as Overtly Unprincipled Hacks
- Watch a City-Sized Glacier Collapse
- Nearly 50 Climate Activists Arrested Outside Obama's White House
- Around the World, A 'Billion Rise' to Fight Violence Against Women and Girls
- Study Finds 80% of All Antibiotics in US Used for Big-Ag
- DOJ Kill List Memo Forces Many Dems Out of the Closet as Overtly Unprincipled Hacks
Popular content
Today's Top News
Malalai Joya Won't Be Silenced by Warlords, Fundamentalists, or US Occupation
A lot of people have tried to silence Malalai Joya. When she spoke in the Afghan parliament as its youngest elected member, the microphones would be turned off. When that didn't deter her, her fellow parliamentarians expelled her.
She has survived four assassination attempts, and still she speaks out, denouncing the warlords, the ''criminals'' in the Hamid Karzai government, the terrorist Taliban, and the occupying troops.
Words pour out of Ms Joya, 32, in a rush, as if she must tell everything she knows in case someone tries to shut her up again.
Advertisement: Story continues below
The democracy activist and campaigner for women's rights is in Sydney to deliver an uncompromising message: ''Democracy never comes by war, by occupation, by cluster bombs and white phosphorous,'' she says.
She wants foreign troops out of Afghanistan because that would mean one less enemy to fight. ''We are sandwiched between two enemies, the Taliban and warlords on one side, and the foreign troops on the other,'' she says.
She says more than 8000 innocent civilians have been killed during the nine years of US and NATO occupation, with a spike under the Obama administration's troop surge; opium production has flourished again, and even the heralded gains for girls and women are a sham.
''The situation in most provinces is as catastrophic as under the domination of the Taliban,'' she says. ''A few schools are built in big cities to justify the occupation but it's the law of the jungle for women in the provinces.''
In the album she carries, mostly photos of shockingly injured civilians, are also pictures of smart Afghan women in the 1960s in modern dress, stepping out. Today women were being whipped, stoned and shot in public for alleged illicit affairs, she said, and rape cases were skyrocketing.
''This is a caricature of democracy,'' she said.
She is unrelenting in her criticism of the Karzai government and sees its recent overtures to moderate Taliban as ''one terrorist group inviting another terrorist group to join the government, and both are misogynist''.
Ms Joya was born four days after the Russian invasion of Afghanistan. Her family fled to Pakistan in 1982, where she went to school in the refugee camps. She returned when the Soviets retreated, and taught girls in secret basement schools under the Taliban.
She was elected to the National Assembly in 2005 and expelled two years later. She decided not to run in the recent election, partly to protect her supporters whose lives would be endangered, and because ''any hope I've had for positive change through the ballot box is gone''.
She was invited to Australia by Deakin University to be the keynote speaker at the World in Crisis/ Business as Usual conference and spoke last night at The Sydney Institute.
''I'm an optimist about Afghanistan,'' she said.
''If I was negative I would come to the West and enjoy my life. But while hope is alive, anything is possible.''
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

59 Comments so far
Show AllWho here is giving "consent to her ascension among the Afghans"?
You are arguing with demons in your head, not the people posting here.
And i am going to sleep now, good night.
It's simple, she had no power before, and now she is in a position to obtain power. You know, pass laws, make rules, that sort of thing.
What is beneath our current debate here is one of legitimacy, because any agreement eventual or otherwise with the Taliban will almost certainly be about the legitimacy of the Governing Body in Kabul installed by the U.S Army.
With that firmly in my mind it is hard to honestly care whether this woman is "good" or "bad". See?
It doesn't matter. That's not why I'm talking about this. That's also, by the way, why I don't understand why some of the posters up above are accusing me of "slander", because from my point of view, I'm simply trying to point out that if someone ran for governor in your state after MURDERING the other people running or was closely associated in ANY WAY WHATSOEVER with the people who committed the murders, you would probably be suspicious of them and what they thought of you and the other common folk.
As I've said before, she can yell at the U.S military all she wants, Karzai does that too, where's that gotten him? Is he more legitimate to the Taliban because he does that? Do you honestly believe that? I don't.
So I don't believe it about this woman. The sense of legitimacy that many people here feel compelled to give to this woman, quite frankly, astonishes me.
I will repeat what I said earlier: If she's really this good, she would be safer, and clearly better appreciated, over hear in America, where she could pursue pretty much the same agenda.
"If she's really this good, she would be safer, and clearly better appreciated, over hear in America, where she could pursue pretty much the same agenda."
She is that good but she's outnumbered. It's like expecting one outstanding senator to pass his or her agenda to save this country when the odds are slim to none with 99 others opposing it.
Well, i'm sure she's waiting on your advice...
And your argument is full of holes. The USA did not invade Afghanistan to place her in power, and she is not in power, having been ousted years ago from her brief term as one isolated member of the legislature, and she is not seeking any office now. And EVERY PERSON who ran in that election did so in the wake of the US invasion.
See ya.