Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- So God Made A Factory Farmer...And Pesticides. And Subsidies. And Corn Syrup. And Mexicans.
- Who Can Own Life? Farmer vs. Monsanto Before US High Court
- Profiting From Human Misery
- With Little More Than a Note, Obama Deploys US Troops To Niger
- 5 Reasons Why the Keystone XL Pipeline is Bad for the Economy
- Who Can Own Life? Farmer vs. Monsanto Before US High Court
- Profiting From Human Misery
- Decolonize the Consumerist Wasteland: Re-imagining a World Beyond Capitalism and Communism
- Scale Implosion: After Ruining America, the Era of Giant Chain Stores Is Over
- 5 Reasons Why the Keystone XL Pipeline is Bad for the Economy
Popular content
Today's Top News
Julian Assange Honored at London Press Conference
You are not likely to learn this from "mainstream media,' but WikiLeaks and its leader Julian Assange have received the 2010 Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence award for their resourcefulness in making available secret U.S. military documents on the Iraq and Afghan wars.
If the WikiLeaks documents get the attention they deserve, and if lessons can be learned from the courageous work of former CIA analyst Sam Adams-and from Daniel Ellsberg's timely leak of Adams' work in early 1968-even the amateurs in the White House may be able to recognize the folly of widening the war from Afghanistan to adjacent countries. That leak played a key role in dissuading President Lyndon Johnson from approving Gen. William Westmoreland's request to send 206,000 more troops-not only into the Big Muddy, but also into countries neighboring Vietnam (further detail below in the description of SAAII).
This year's award was presented Saturday, with the customary "corner-brightener candlestick," by SAAII awardee, and former UK ambassador, Craig Murray, after Julian Assange and Daniel Ellsberg discussed WikiLeaks' release of almost 400,000 classified battlefield reports from Iraq. The award reads as follows:
It seems altogether fitting and proper that this year's award be presented in London, where Edmund Burke coined the expression "Fourth Estate." Comparing the function of the press to that of the three Houses then in Parliament, Burke said:
"... but in the Reporters Gallery yonder, there sits a Fourth Estate more important far then they all."
The year was 1787 - the year the U.S. Constitution was adopted. The First Amendment, approved four years later, aimed at ensuring that the press would be free of government interference. That was then.
With the Fourth Estate now on life support, there is a high premium on the fledgling Fifth Estate, which uses the ether and is not susceptible of government or corporation control. Small wonder that governments with lots to hide feel very threatened.
It has been said: "You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." WikiLeaks is helping make that possible by publishing documents that do not lie.
Last spring, when we chose WikiLeaks and Julian Assange for this award, Julian said he would accept only "on behalf of our sources, without which WikiLeaks' contributions are of no significance."
We do not know if Pvt. Bradley Manning gave WikiLeaks the gun-barrel video of July 12, 2007 called "Collateral Murder." Whoever did provide that graphic footage, showing the brutality of the celebrated "surge" in Iraq, was certainly far more a patriot than the "mainstream" journalist embedded in that same Army unit. He suppressed what happened in Baghdad that day, dismissed it as simply "one bad day in a surge that was filled with such days," and then had the temerity to lavish praise on the unit in a book he called The Good Soldiers.
Julian is right to emphasize that the world is deeply indebted to patriotic truth-tellers like the sources who provided the gun-barrel footage and the many documents on Afghanistan and Iraq to WikiLeaks. We hope to have a chance to honor them in person in the future.
Today we honor WikiLeaks, and one of its leaders, Julian Assange, for their ingenuity in creating a new highway by which important documentary evidence can make its way, quickly and confidentially, through the ether and into our in-boxes. Long live the Fifth Estate!
Presented this 23rd day of October 2010 in London, England by admirers of the example set by former CIA analyst, Sam Adams.
What Is Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence?
SAAII is a movement of former CIA colleagues and other associates of former intelligence analyst Sam Adams, who hold up his example as a model for those in intelligence who would aspire to the courage to speak truth to power. Sam did precisely that, and in honoring his memory, SAAII confers an award each year to a member of the intelligence profession exemplifying Sam Adam's courage, persistence, and devotion to truth - no matter the consequences.
It was Adams who discovered in 1967 that there were at least 500,000 Vietnamese Communists under arms - more than twice the number that our military in Saigon would admit to in the "war of attrition." Gen. William Westmoreland had put an artificial limit on the number that Army intelligence was allowed to carry on its books. And Gen. Creighton Abrams specifically warned Washington that the press would have a field day if Adam's numbers were released, and that this would weaken the war effort.
Westmoreland's figures were shown to be bogus in January/February 1968, when Communist troops mounted a surprise countrywide offensive in numbers that proved that Adams' analysis had been correct. But because Sam was reluctant to go "outside channels," the CIA and Army were able to keep the American people in the dark.
After the Tet offensive, however, Daniel Ellsberg learned that Westmoreland had asked for 206,000 more troops to widen the war into Cambodia, Laos, and North Vietnam - right up to the border with China, and perhaps beyond. In his first such act, Ellsberg leaked Sam Adams' data to the then-independent New York Times on March 19, 1968. Dan's timely truth telling, and that of the Times' Neil Sheehan, won the day.
On March 25, President Johnson complained to a small gathering, "The leaks to the New York Times hurt us...We have no support for the war. This is caused by the 206,000 troop request [by Westmoreland] and the leaks...I would have given Westy the 206,000 men." On March 31, Johnson introduced a bombing pause, opted for negotiations, and announced that he would not run for another term in November 1968.
Sam Adams continued to press for honesty and accountability but stayed "inside channels" - and failed. He was not able to see that the supervening value of ending unnecessary killing trumped the secrecy agreement he had signed as a condition of employment. Nagged by remorse, Adams died at 55 of a sudden heart attack. He could not shake the thought that, had he not let himself be diddled, the entire left wall of the Vietnam memorial would not exist. There would have been no new names to chisel into such a wall.
In the past, the annual Sam Adams Award has been given to truth tellers Coleen Rowley of the FBI; Katharine Gun of British Intelligence; Sibel Edmonds of the FBI; Craig Murray, former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan; former US Army Sgt. Sam Provance, who told the truth about Abu Ghraib; and Maj. Frank Grevil of Danish Army Intelligence, who exposed his government's eagerness to conspire with the Bush administration in advertising non-existent weapons of mass destruction in order to "justify" the invasion of Iraq - and went to prison for it; and Larry Wilkerson, Col., US Army (ret.), former chief of staff to Secretary Colin Powell at the State Department, who exposed the powers behind many of the crimes of the Bush administration - first and foremost what he called the "Cheney-Rumsfeld cabal;" in Washington, DC.
An earlier version of this article ran on Consortiumnews.com
Ray McGovern was a colleague of Sam Adams and witnessed the gyrations Sam went through to get the truth out about Vietnam (sans the option WikiLeaks now offers)-in vain. Ray has acknowledged that, in 1967, he, too, blew a golden opportunity to "do a Dan Ellsberg" on Vietnam.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



20 Comments so far
Show All"Small wonder that governments with lots to hide feel very threatened."
Governments have nothing to hide.
Elites have everything to hide.
If it appears that governments have something to hide, that is a crystal clear indication that the government has been hijacked by elites.
The action to take, for the people, then is to purge their government of elites.
To help embolden our fellow citizens to pick up their torches and pitchforks, and march on Washing-town, we can vote third party candidates in the upcoming elections.
Such votes help drain the air out of the elite balloon so we can reach it better with our torches and pitchforks.
Lots of great socialist/universalist policies to implement after that.
Indeed, all we need do is look to places like France to see what must be done. Just wait, conditions will be worsening even further here in the US.
Without meaning to be pedantic, your categorical statement that "governments have nothing to hide" seems inconsistent with your subsequent argument. Clearly some governments have plenty to hide as primary instruments and implementers of elite interests and aspirations.
"Governments have nothing to hide.
"Elites have everything to hide."
I belive that's the most profound prose I've seen you write. Bravo!!
JUSTICE ARCS posited that perhaps Julian A works as an insider. Most of the recipients of the Sam Adams award share that status.
I'm glad that Julian is slated for this award, as I do see a value (let's call it the Just Side of Shock and Awe) in having the record made transparent. However, no one on the list of recipients seems to challenge the make-war establishment or militarism, itself. (Maybe Ellsberg is the exception.)
Just as some in this forum wisely point out that senators/representatives like Wellstone, Franks, Kucinich lend their imprimatur to an otherwise corrupt party; this award seems to say there IS a legitimate way to run spy (CIA) operations, and accumulate data about other lands largely for the purpose of efficiently attacking them.
In other words, there is a gaping moral disconnect in the ritual of passing out this award, along with what it stands for.
Sioux Rose: Webster Tarpley suggested that Assange might be an insider as well. I still don't know enough about it yet to make a judgement.
Webster Tarpley sees the hand of the CIA in everybody and everything.I heard an interview with him on KPFA a couple of months ago. He's become my new gold standard for stark bonkers madness on the left. Makes you wonder if he's a real person, with a name like that.
ricardo:
I think he is a real person, and I do agree that he goes overboard on certain issues, however he has raised some important valid points about the international financial system: I have seen him interviewed on Russia Today (RT) and heard him on KPFA as well. He did not provide any evidence that Assange was an insider, therefore only wild speculation. He may be a bit paranoid, but I don't think he is insane (however I am no psychiatrist).
Well, I may be funning a bit, and maybe I exagerate.He can't be dismissed entirely-however, his name seems to be popping up more and more on CD as an "authority", which makes me cringe.For me, he's a little hard to take seriously, but that's just my opinion.There's certainly no harm in listening to what he has to say (my eyes glaze over), and drawing your own conclusions.
Sioux, the unfolding events need to be carefully looked at. Just remember that the Noble Prize also has been awarded to those who were not worthy. Just because one wins and award does not give it credibility because of other names attached.
I would like to know what past awardees have to say about it, especially Coleen Rowley and Sibel Edmonds.
That said, I wonder why certain whistleblowers end up quite financially well to do while most others end up very poor or deceased...
The end game appears to keep troops in the Middle East and for other purposes. Mr. Assange may be honorable and was used for this end, or he is complicit. Most of his leaked material is common knowledge for those who have paid attention. The media circus he has created with the "embeds" and absence of NLS's lead me to believe he is a willing participant. I wonder what the Nobel Committee would say?
I know for a fact that Sibel Edmonds, Coleen Rowley and a whole host of other whistleblowers do see the development of WikiLeaks as some hope of being the answer to the lack of any effective whistleblower protection here in the U.S. as well as the answer to the lack of the type of independence that the investigative media used to enjoy. Main stream media reporters, even Pulitzer-prize winning ones, are effectively threatened with losing access or press passes (or being fired as Helen Thomas and Juan Williams were) if they do not report stories as the government or corporations want them to. In some cases, reporters are even threatened with being jailed for failing to reveal their sources (as Judith Miller and James Risen were/are). No longer are Woodward and Bernstein types able to keep their "Deep Throat" sources confidential. Journalists are also constantly under surveillance and are being monitored by the NSA's warrantless monitoring program. In this way, the government detects when a reporter happens to find something out that the government would prefer the public not know. There is no reporter-shield law that exists in the U.S.
For these reasons and more, "freedom of the press" has really taken a big hit in inside the U.S. in the last few years. If WikiLeaks can operate internationally, outside the borders of the various countries it makes disclosures about, and if it can assure confidentiality of sources, and thereby accomplish more timely truthful disclosures, it can bolster the mainstream media and help serve as an effective outlet for the truth.
I absolutely agree. However I know for a fact that Mr. Assange has towed the "company line" with respect to something Sibel testified about.
AESOPS: I am entirely neutral on Julian's status. I don't know. My point was that it's curious that an agency mostly rewarding sleuths within its own ranks offered him the award. I also tried to make the point that people like Ray McGovern remind me of Andrew Bacevich in that both remain INSIDERS to a military system (or particular branch of it). Like the handful of democrats with conscience, their presence inside these organizations seems to suggest an attempt to raise the bar. However, there's also the ugly fact that they also lend credibility and a cloak of honor to organizations that in my view violate those very notions, given their self-appointed licenses to kill. With well over a million fairly recent casualties, that raison d'etre must stop! Intelligence is to the killing machine what the architect is to the building's blueprints.
Excellent, Sioux!
I can only go by my inner sensing, which is always reliable for me. That is what this type of situation calls for, when all is said and done.
And we both know that the development of our inner senses are what we will be needing to utitilize, more and more. In conjunction with our intellects.
We need both sides of our brains to be firing!
I trust his intentions. That is my own sensing, however. It reminds me of the Truman Show. When someone would break onto the set and tell him it is all a tv show. There are ways to go outside the reality that 'they' have created. They aren't infinite and they don't control the universe. They are limited by virtue of their constricted view of reality.
And there is my own little take!
Peace,
rita
I agree somewhat with all commenters responding to my post. The problem with "deep state" is that it operates in the "abstract". This makes it extremely difficult or nearly impossible to find out what is really going on. This allows "it" plausible deniabilty and much needed time to make adjustments in the event things become exposed or go wrong.
This is a situation that needs to assessed in the abstract with all reliable/available information going back 10 or more years. A lie is covered by a lie.....occasionally sprinkled with a little truth and involve many operators sometimes unaware.
The way the operators work are key in uncovering this abstract world. Sibel could weigh in on this as could others. Julian has made at least 2 very important mistakes. Sibels take will be important if she discusses this (NSLs' may still prevent her from doing so). Her website is boilingfrogspost.com
RITA: I certainly understand about sensing, and yet I can admit I have sometimes been wrong... or shall we say, fooled.
Many years ago when I lived in London, I came across a very funny set of cartoon-like booklets which were based on the Zodiac signs. In the Leo booklet (mine) there was an illustration of an individual who looked like a crafty pirate, with the other person's arm wrapped joyously around them. The other person was the Leo. The caption stated, "Leos are great judges of character." I think, since we come "from the heart," that we look for that light, or love in others. (Leo women have quite dramatic love lives as a result).
You, yourself, wrote about Obama as the "savior" phenomenon. I think many of us want Julian to be that savior, too. I do believe the man is coming from a place of rare courage.
Last night I watched, "Casablanca" which I was lucky enough to locate at a consignment shop. The central figure, Laslow, who led an underground resistance against the Nazis demonstrated that type of courage that rises to the top of what otherwise too often can seem like the human junk heap.
In this era with government acting like the worst of organized criminals, so many unexamined questions--like 911 left unanswered; it's almost reflexive to question ANY source.
The levels of depravity that the U.S. war machine has thus far gotten away with must be calling to the heavens and earth for agencies of redress. Perhaps Julian is one of "The Chosen" for that operation, armed by fate to accelerate the promise of justice arching back to what is LAW-FULL, as opposed to its darkly established counterfeits.
I see this :
"If the WikiLeaks documents get the attention they deserve, and if lessons can be learned from the courageous work of former CIA analyst Sam Adams-and from Daniel Ellsberg's timely leak of Adams' work in early 1968-even the amateurs in the White House may be able to recognize the folly of widening the war from Afghanistan to adjacent countries. That leak played a key role in dissuading President Lyndon Johnson from approving Gen. William Westmoreland's request to send 206,000 more troops-not only into the Big Muddy, but also into countries neighboring Vietnam (further detail below in the description of SAAII)."
Maybe the White House people breathed a sigh of relief, as they recognise, now, the folly of what they intended (or said they intended) to do. Assange could have been on their side after all!
~sc
~sc
Naybe CNN's Atika Shubert will invite Assange back to interview him about his award. lol
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/23/julian-assange-walks-out-_n_772837.html
A brave man up against it.
What is true, is that their will be many Americans, who if you mention Wikileaks, will say Wiki, what?