Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
John Steinbeck, Michael Moore, and the Burgeoning Role of Planetary Patriotism
My father, John Steinbeck, was a man who held human history in great reverence, and in particular the biographies of those people who had risked their lives, their fortunes, and their worldly honor to defend the rights and prerogatives of those who were powerless to defend themselves. Under his guidance I read Herodotus and Thucydides before I got around to Wind in the Willows.
My father valued patriotism above all other social obligations, but he had his own particular interpretation of just how true patriotism was meant to function. His definition was directly geared to a socio-political axiom of his own invention, and I knew it by heart by the time I was seven years old. He said, "If the solution to a problem of absolute disagreement extends to a call for bloodshed, then neither party has demonstrated the intelligence to formulate the question properly." He also liked to affirm that only poets and composers should be made ambassadors. According to Steinbeck, most political placemen have neither the wit, nor compassion for such a profound responsibility that so desperately requires both.
With this in mind, the Steinbeck Award points to examples of American patriots who have made an indelible impact on our culture, and even influenced the core sense of ourselves on a worldwide plane. And they have all come to us with two rare qualities in common that are quite unique for human beings. First, they are all artists, poets, composers, writers, singers, playwrights, and so forth, and secondly, none of the award recipients to date has ever drawn blood over a bad review. On the contrary, as true patriots they have been willing, and morally well braced to endure, not only rank and file criticism, but also broad disdain, public ridicule, numerous slanders of every hue, and in some cases even physical violence. From my father's point of view, without a thought for self, a true patriot stands up against the stones of condemnation, and speaks for those who are given no real voice in the halls of justice, or the halls of government. By doing so these people will naturally become the enemies of the political status quo. J. Edgar Hoover hated my father with an abiding passion, and believed he was a full-blown Red communist, which, if you knew my father, would be found ridiculous on the face of it. But since J. Edgar had nothing he could pin on Steinbeck, he used his power to encourage the IRS to audit my father's taxes every single year of his life, just to be politically annoying. I'm quite sure that previous Steinbeck Award recipients like Studs Terkel, Arthur Miller, and Joan Baez would have blood-chilling tales to tell in that same regard, but they never faltered, in fact they all won handsomely against the forces arrayed against them, and they are now part of our proud public idiom of intellectual independence like Mark Twain, Louis Armstrong, and Woody Guthrie. So if this recipient of the Steinbeck Award, Michael Moore is half the man we believe him to be, then he has by now received at least as many written death threats as Steinbeck, Miller, and Terkel combined. My father believed, like Pericles, that a man's genius could be easily judged by the number of unenlightened fools set in phalanx against his ideas.
Be that as it may, John Steinbeck was the first person I ever heard use the phrases 'ecological balance', or 'conservation of organic energy'. He had watched us walk on the moon, and yet remain childishly embroiled in a pitiful and pointless series of military conflicts from which there would emerge no winners. And with this knowledge that everything had changed technologically speaking, he still witnessed voices of sanity and social equilibrium being politically smothered on a global scale. In that vein, he once sent me a letter in Viet Nam in which he stated that he had completely modified his perception of patriotism. Where the concept had once easily applied to one's county, state, country, or empire, it was obvious that the idea of patriotic principles now had to be applied to the whole world at large. Culture and language aside, the planet was now so chemically and financially interlinked, that the failure of one, meant the fall of many. He closed his letter by quoting Socrates. "Do not call me an Athenian. I am a citizen of the world."
In this particular instance, and without question, Mr. Michael Moore aptly fulfills every required parameter designed to guide the choice of award recipients. When once asked what his role was as a writer, Steinbeck said it was to reconnect people with a sense of their own innate humanity. This sentiment has been the guiding principle in all choices made for the Steinbeck Award, and Mr. Moore has carried the banner higher than the world ever expected. We are profoundly proud of him, and also proud that he accepts the honor as it was intended.

49 Comments so far
Show AllMister Steinbeck .. you are right to remind people of what your father wrote and felt for and taught...and also are trying to impart and remind.
I have long admired his works...and to this day try to "push" it to friends, most specially his "Grapes of Wrath" -- which, merely THINKING about it, picturing the chapters in my mind, never fails to make me shed tears.
And if , as you revealed, your father believed in Patriotism to the world and all humanity, and on what you said about "composers and poets" in his ideas...he in fact , known to him or not, was pointing to what the great german composer Ludwig Beethoven - who ALSO intoned poet Schilling's "Ode to Joy" in his greatest work the SYmphony no.9 on the brotherhood of all humanity - had once reportedly done:
that upon finishing his THIRD symphony , some calling it "eroica", he originally dedicated it to Napoleon Bonaparte, when bonaparte had helped overthrown the "nobility" that had so oppressed the french people...but that when Napoleon took in his own hand the crown and crowned HIMSELF "emperor of france"...Beethoven, upon hearing the news, exclaimed: "SO! he is just another Tyrant!!" and in anger and frustration, scratched off the original dedication or tore that copy apart..and on another copy wrote:
"to the memory of a great man"...perhaps , as questions have gone over the generations, in Sad homage to what Napoleon betrayed.
I always thought there were spiritual connections in these matters..the humanity of one composer speaking in another writer or merely even any of us. in my own personal growth ..i had long fancied myself as being someone that , at the very least, WISHED to be a "citizen of the world" ..and at times found myself among friends or people I know looking askance at why I would say that...as if it was some strange thing. Little did I know that it is merely following along the same path as your Father taught....but which also was something I was guided in by my own mother, similarly in being aware of the great works of literature from around the world, as reflections of our humanity's great variations of culture - but always pointing to the same thing: we are INDEED citizens of the world...while yet needing to find that it is SO, just as your father said.
May your father's work, and thought, and devotion to being a "citizen of the world" never fail to move and be read and instruct for as long as humanity exists.
I profoundly agree with the sentiments and reasons for the creation of the Thomas Steinbeck Award. I also agree with the reasons given for Michael Moore receiving that revered honor!
Planetary Patriotism is a virtue towards which we all should aspire!
One of the many reasons I have for loving my wife has been that she inspired me to read all the classics that I missed. She gave me a copy of "Cannery Row" and I was hooked. Here was someone that wrote about a my world. A world full of people with good intentions and personal failings. His ability to illustrate in words real people in real settings is an art that has been almost totally lost. It is for this reason I am glad that you have chosen Mr. Moore for an award in the Steinbeck name. Mr. Moore also has this ability. In a world full of shows about lawyers, cops, and the rich; movies that speak truth to power from the perspective of the "little guy" are desperately needed. Thank you, and I would encourage all to read "The Grapes of Wrath" and my personal favorite "In Dubious Battle" books that are prescient in our time.
I have long been a great admirer of John Steinbeck and his works. I was just looking at a copy of "Travels with Charley" the other day and remembering the first time I read it. I was struck then that this man of nearly 60 years of age would embark on a trip around the country because he said that he needed to discover it all over again. The book is full of his perceptive observations about the America of 1960. One sentence that displayed his ecological awareness was when he asked "Why it is that "progress" looks so much like destruction?" I have asked that question myself many times since. Mr. Steinbeck traveled this country in his pickup/camper which was an unusual thing to do back then. I used to live in the San Francisco Bay Area and took a drive down to Salinas one weekend so that I could visit the Steinbeck Museum. It is a wonderful place which gives an excellent sense of the life that Steinbeck led. It also has the original pickup truck and camper top that he used in his journey with his big French poodle, Charley. It was quite a moment to stand next to "Rocinante", the name of Don Quixote's horse, and imagine one of my favorite authors at the steering wheel and looking out at the America that he had written so well about.
I agree that Micheal Moore is a fine choice to receive the award and I hope that he will continue to make the kind of films that help us to come to grips with what our country has become and to try and reform it without violence.
I've always wanted a whirl poodle.
Thomas, your fathers words...along with the songs of Guthrie, Seeger, Ochs, Baez....allowed me to keep my sanity while others were losing theirs. They showed me that I was not alone in my vision of what humanity is...or... should/could be.
The US and the world is in more dire need of those words and songs than at any other time in history.
Unfortunately Mr. Moore did little, if anything to advance the cause of progressivism when he appeared on Bill Maher's program Real Time on Sept. 17. As I was flipping through the channels I heard Moore proclaim, in a burst of righteous indignation, when referring to the elections coming up in 2012, that:
"I don't think anyone in their right mind is gonna want to go back two years ago and to the absolutely fucking disaster that we had. I just can't believe it's gonna happen."
As to be expected, the audience who was watching Maher's program and hearing Moore say those words gave him a big round of applause for his Democratic apologist speech. And also to be expected, Moore conveniently neglected to mention what a big disaster the Obama administration has been in the way that it has kowtowed to corporate and military power in the already brief time that it has been in office. Apparently the last thing that Moore would ever do would be to urge his viewers not to vote for either a Democrat or a Republican but for a candidate who is actually advocating for the immediate withdrawal of ALL U.S. forces from Afghanistan and Iraq and for the implementation of universal health care in this country, a country which has the dubious honor of being the only industrialized country in the world which does not administer UHC to its citizens.
Erroll,
I saw the clip here on CD last week of Moore on Countdown with that Olbermann ass clown--they were stating that Democrats should be CELEBRATING the passage of that health care bill.
I wanted to puke.
Maher is yet another Dem apologist.
Any respect I once had for Moore is gone.
Thanks for sharing.
I give props to Moore for his films and raising much needed awareness.
However, like most liberals, he's unable to get the ball all the way down the field and score. He still covers for Obama and the feckless Dems.
And his urging of Nader not to run a few years back was inexcusable.
And BTW - where did it get us?
@ jbarret1: Along with Michael Moore, Bill Murray and many others, I gave my time, money and vote to Ralph Nader in 2000 and where did that get us? Eight years of George W. Bush. I'd take eight years of Obama over Junior any day of the week.
RSJ may wish to turn around his analogy and ask himself where voting for Obama got him and the country. His specious claim that eight years of Obama would be better than Bush ignores the fact that getting the lesser of two evils still results in an evil. I seriously doubt if the many Afghans who have seen their families ripped apart by America's 500 lb. bombs are grateful that those bombs were dropped on them by Barack Obama instead of George W. Bush. Let us not forget the many Pakistanis and people of Yemen and Somalia who have been torn to pieces by Predator drone missiles which have been rained down upon them by the less than benevolent Barack Obama.
I also seriously doubt if Ralph Nader would have continued the legacy of Bush that Barack Obama has so eagerly and enthusiastically carried out.
Here, here. My candidate may not have won, and we will never know if Lieberman would have been a more evil VP than Cheney, or Gore more ineffective than Bush II, but one thing we do know, the "change" promised by Obama and the Democratic party did not materialize--and never will as long as the corporate parties control the American psyche into believing there is no other choice. Never underestimate the stupidity of the Amercan voter is the mantra of both Titanic Parties. Candidates that speak intelligently to an informed electorate are never elected. Candidates that are elected don't change a thing.
In his nealy two years in office,Obama has OUT-DRONED George Wanker Bush in all of his eight hellish years.
Bush+Obama=death
RSJ - having a real hard time seeing the difference between W. and Obama. For if Obama were different he may have found a place in his administration for the likes of Ralph. Instead, he kept W's agenda in tact and kept many of the same players.
Change you can believe in??? I don't think so.
The Empire rolls on................
don't forget how he SHUT OUT the "single-payer" advocates - and sat back as they were arrested or intimidated.
Indeed--Obama had taken single payer off the table without discussion and now hires a former health insurance cartel excecutive Liz Fowler to head up health care.
Liz Fowler helped to craft this shitty legislation and she and her other insurance buddies helped to block single payer and even the watered down "public option."
Obama really knows how to pick 'em!
exactly, Chelsey.
and Obama , let's remember, graduated as a CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR...
and I suspect - he INTENTIONALLY studied the constitution, in order to DISMANTLE It.
what a CREEP! that's like someone learning accounting in order to SWINDLE people.. or someone studying science in order to create biological war, or someone that learns psychology in order to learn how to torture.
EVIL itself. no other word for it.
and obama's "cool" ...I suspect is closer to what the lead american investigator that questioned the Nazi leaders during the nuremeber trial , and his conclusion:
"I LEARNED that EVIL is the COMPLETE ABSENCE of conscience. it is BANAL and i found that some of its worst people can be the most ordinary looking and upright".
RSJ,
Hmmm, seems you need to read up on Obama--and steer clear of the corporate M$M!
Here's a good place to start:
THE OBAMA SYNDROME By Tariq Ali
Chelsey
Very good suggestion as my copy should be arriving in a couple of weeks. I have also ordered another book which also critiques Obama from the left and that is The Mendacity of Hope by Roger Hodge an excerpt of which currently appears in the latest issue of Harper's magazine. I am currently reading the new and most insightful book by Paul Street entitled The Empire's New Clothes: Barack Obama in The Real World of Power as well as trying to squeeze in time to also read a most well written tome on that pernicious topic called Zionism in a book called Israeli Exceptionalism: The Destabilizing Logic of Zionism by M. Shahid Alam. I highly recommend this book for this who desire to get a clearer picture on this topic which is written in easy to understand prose of how the Israelis have attempted to justify over the years their claim that the lands that have been occupied by the native settlers for many years, i.e. the Palestinians, supposedly belong to them.
Well, whatever happened that caused Gore to lose saved us from a bigger disaster: Joe Lieberman.
As far as Moore and this award, just remember the one Obama got.
Neither award means anything now.
Great filmmaker, but dubious citizen. Accept the wonderful lessons he (Moore) provides on film, but reject his political assertions.
Ralph Nader is more deserving of the Steinbeck award than Michael Moore. He is staying the course. No public official can answer sensibly to the laser focus he regularly puts on the important issues.
jabarret1,
Well stated.
I used to like Micheal Moore-- he seemed like a nice guy.
I really enjoyed his SICKO documentary--I thought he had taken health care seriously.
But as you stated, he covers for those feckless Democrats--which is really a pity.
I see Moore as an entertainment tool--nothing more.
Michael Moore, though certainly flawed, has still done more to open peoples eyes to the "Coroprate Abomination" than most who have a voice on the airwaves.
That is why he is so despised in the Corporate M$M. I think the award is justified.
Yeah, he's certainly better than nothing--I guess. Although as powerful as his films are, they have changed little-if anything. Any momentum they provide is quickly drained when he turns into Mr. Hyde (as he always does around election time.)
I talked with Moore about that last year. He agrees with you.
Michael Moore is a worthy recipient of the Steinbeck Award.
Like your father, he has never forgotten, in spite of all his incredible success and growing celebrity, that what matters is what any of us actually do on behalf the "least" of us.
He's never forgotten that none of us are ever truly prosperous, happy, safe, or free - until we all are.
And he continues to make films that force us to see, and that hold our feet to fire until we agree to act.
Michael, regardless of how it might appear - every day that passes a few more of us really "get it," and you're a big part of the reason why.
Here's to 2010's "Most Dangerous Man in America." We Love Yah.
A minor point: Charley the standard French poodle was not Steinbeck's dog; he belonged to a friend who was in Europe that summer and had asked Steinbeck to take care of his dog for him. Steinbeck mentions that Charley was bilingual and could respond to either French or English, but was quicker in his first language because translating to English slowed him down.
I have always been a supporter of Michael Moore, the many years of his activism and especially his films. Recognition of these life long actions and works that the presentation of the award implies only emphasizes what many people have know and applauded for years.
Here at the Common Dreams mutual admiration society of “Restore Liberal”; Moore's works and accomplishments,like so many others, are often seen as only existing because of the dreaded lime light the Democratic Party brand of liberals affords them.This allows commentators to ‘diss’them by such comments as :
You see- Moore just has not distanced himself sufficiently against Obama , the DP and media et al; so he is "hopeless with shallow,limited political vision"; "a court jester of sorts and as such is not to be taken seriously."
This non distancing is so horrendous that some have expressed their feelings on it with infant like out tantrums of futility- defiantly holding of the breath and stomping their feet-“I will not vote for the Democrats; I will no longer take him seriously or ever see his films”. So there!
The likes of Michael Moore, Tom Englehardt, and others who are so often taken to task for the same questionable reasons-are hardly shaken by the winds of praise or blame; they don’t allow others to define -who to vote for, or more importantly another's good or badness and really –why should you?
“My father believed, like Pericles, that a man's genius could be easily judged by the number of unenlightened fools set in phalanx against his ideas.”
What a great statement. Congratulations Michael Moore.
Yes, indeed.
Michael Moore is a good capitalist, he has made a fortune selling media to a certain segment of the population.
Yours is a somewhat cynical comment with which I completely agree.
Would either of the two correspondents above have had the guts to do what Michael Moore did at the Acadamy Award ceremony? Do you have any idea how much profit he threw out the window (not to mention the death threats and harrassment) by denouncing the Iraq invasion to an audience of millions, five days after its inception?
But, yet, he strongly supports the war-mongering Democratic Party.
It is somewhat of a paradox isn't it?
One can always disagree about tactics but Michael Moore's progressive credentials are extensive and unimpeachable, and we of a progressive bias should always be able to recognize someone who is pulling in the same direction, and, in Moore's case, pulling harder than most.
Unimpeachable?
Try posting something upon his blog that is unflattering. It languishes and dies in some purgatory called =pending= while ass kissing posts flow onto pages like shit through a goose. My respect for Michael Moore is become a peregrine who has seen a stationary rabbit.
Trylon
because moore spots parasites like you immediately and squishes them. he's smart. i hope CD learns from moore.
at least sincere people on CD should stop feeding these worms.
curiousteve:
Hey, you can kiss all the ass you want to. MM has a big target. He made a complete fool of himself in Canada earlier this month - sticking his uninformed nose into THEIR politics. And he did not want to BE informed by my 30 years experience living in Canada. But the truth doesn't go away.
Trylon
I might have added to the above, Moore's denunciation of the Iraq war and the very legitimacy of the Bush regeme occurred when the nation was in full hysteria whipped up by the corporate media and, if anyone remembers, almost the entire left community had lockjaw, simple cowardly lockjaw. Moore's statement at the Acadamy Awards ceremony was a great act of bravery. Viva Moore!
another neo-shill. please do not feed these parasites.
your agenda is clear to all here: trash CD as a credible source of information and inspiration for and about the progressives.
shills like you have trashed huffpo and many others.
i will never feed you from now on.
You don't know what Capitalism is, or you could not say that. Capitalism is not trade, it is not sales, it is not business. All of that existed long before Capitalism arose. Capitalism is the profiting from buying and selling the labor of others. It is dealing in human lives on a more profound and destructive level than slavery did. The output, the products of people's labor, is stripped from them for the purpose of increasing the power and domination over them by the owners. Along with that loss by the worker - most of his time and the value of his productivity - goes the loss of all meaning and purpose in life, of all freedom and autonomy, and of all community and culture.
It is not merely profit. That misrepresents the case.
Traders profited on goods they took from one place to another long before Capitalism. Artisans sell items they make for more than the cost of the materials that went into the items. That is not Capitalism.
What is new is profiting from the labor of others - forcibly separating the production of a person from that person, dominating and controlling and exploiting others as though they were slaves.
If you and I were dealing directly with one another we would trade the product of one hour of your work for the product of one hour of my work. If you made a quiver of arrows in an hour, and I made a pair of shoes in an hour, we would trade that quiver for that pair straight up. Enter the Capitalist, and suddenly you have to work 10 hours making arrows to afford the pair of shoes I make, and I have to work ten hours making shoes to buy a quiver of arrows. Where does the product of the other 9 hours from each of us go? Look around and it is easy to see where it goes. A handful of people are piling up massive amounts of wealth. And how does that Capitalist get in a position where he can control both of us? By having capital. And how does he get capital? By controlling us.
We fight for freedom and self-determination, not for stuff. We fight against domination and oppression, not against greed or wealth. We fight to release people from bondage, not to convert them to new beliefs. We fight to improve the conditions under which people suffer, not to improve the people.
Those who rise to the top and gain power are those who are unable or unwilling to relate to others as equals. They must dominate others, must be in control. Amassing capital is the way to control others, and having even a slight advantage over another in access to capital puts one in the more powerful position, everywhere and in all things. This is perverting and corrupting all of our social relationships. It is recent, and while pervasive it is shallow and needs constant propping up and suppression of its victims to persist, and is contrary to the way things have been done in human societies since the beginning of time. This means that it can be overthrown, it will be overthrown. The most anti-social people among us are allowed to seize the most social power over others. That won't work, and cannot last, and is the root cause of all of the political and social problems.
With the steady accretion of wealth comes the corollary, steady accretion of Power, like drop after drop building a stalagmite. With both comes social stratification into ranks and classes and the unequal ability to affect or control government.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Jane Goodall has shown us that power corrupts great apes (which we are) at a biological level. (Bill & Monica.)
Add those together and one of the constant products of power is overt or covert demand for sexual access along the power hierarchy. Want a job? Want to keep your job? Want a promotion? Anybody remember the Congressional scandal regarding high school students interning as Pages? "What page are you on?" they asked each other.
I revere John Steinbeck as one of our greatest writers and a major contributor to the progressive cause. However, I cannot forget that he publicly supported the Vietnam war, which was a great disappointment to me at the time. Perhaps the man that wrote "Winter of Our Discontent" was much changed from he who wrote "Grapes of Wrath" and "In Dubious Battle".
Tony Vodvarka
I watched Michael Moore's Capitalism A Love Story. I was impressed by how much he listened. John Steinbeck's Grapes of Wrath and East of Eden gave me more insight into not just the human condition but in East of Eden the inner workings of the characters. The same with Arthur Miller. And with Rainer Maria Rilke and the Sufi poet, Rumi. And our very own national treasure of a poet Walt Whitman. Thank you Thomas Steinbeck for this article.
I believe the award is given for...effort....not perfection.
As such, compared to most consumers pretending to be citizens, Mr. Moore is assuredly more astute, more galvanizing, more of benefit to global society, than many who would criticize his recognition for effort to..make the world better...
I feel confident that we all can...improve...our standards.
Thank you Michael Moore, and as your friend and fellow global citizen, I forgive your inability to yet see through the veil of global corporate machinations posing as "American Democrats".
Kind regards,
B