Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Why Say Yes to the Party of No?
How does the Big Business-indentured Republican Party get away with
expectations of a runaway election victory this November? If such a
victory should occur in Congress and for many governorships and state
legislatures, it will be due to a ten percent or so shift in voters who
voted Democratic in 2008 and are expected to vote Republican this year
or stay home in despair or disgust. The rest of the voters who do vote
will still stay with their hereditary Republican or Democratic
candidates.
So what is accounting for a possible ten percent shift? Let’s briefly
review some of the Congressional Republicans’ voiced positions:
1. They want to do nothing about unfair Chinese trade practices that
lure jobs away from our country though huge factory subsidies, and where
workers are repressed and counterfeit products abound. Imagine,
Republicans coddling a communist regime, luring the auto parts,
electronic, solar and drug ingredients industries away from America,
often in violation of the World Trade Organization rules. And, in turn,
China is exporting to the U.S. impure food, faulty tires, toxic drywall,
lead-tainted toys and medicines which are contaminated, defective or
harmful. Don’t forget the dumping violations.
2. Republicans, led by Senator Richard Shelby and his banking friends,
declared their adamant opposition to Professor Elizabeth Warren becoming
head of the new consumer financial regulation agency. (To avoid a
confrontation with them, President Obama made her a special assistant to
organize this consumer watchdog.) Ms. Warren has a solid record of
exposing and communicating clearly to families the tricks and traps of
credit card companies, mortgage firms, and intermediaries that have
taken so many billions of consumer dollars with impunity.
3. The Republicans led by their House leader, John Boehner (Rep. Ohio), a
total toady of the gouging student loan companies, opposed the
Democrats successful reform of this taxpayer boondoggle that guaranteed
obscene profits and had the taxpayers absorb any student defaults.
Boehner’s lobbying should upset millions of parents who had to foot the
bill for so many years.
4. The Republicans are opposed to raising the federal minimum wage to
what it was, adjusted for inflation, in 1968!! They opposed an adequate
budget for health and safety enforcement by OSHA to diminish the 58,000
American workers who die every year from workplace toxics and trauma.
They are now blocking protections for coal miners pending in the Senate
after the Massey mine disaster.
5. Republicans oppose doing anything about “too big to fail” even after
Wall Street’s reckless, avaricious collapse of the economy, costing 8
million jobs and trillions of lost pension and mutual fund dollars.
Moreover, they do not support genuine enforcement of the anti-trust laws
which are supposed to break up monopolization efforts, monopolies or
oligopolies like Monsanto (seeds) or the big five banks—bailed out by
taxpayers and secure in their domination of well over 50 percent of all
bank assets, deposits and the credit card business. This is by far the
highest concentration of financial power in modern U.S. history. With
few exceptions, the GOP want very few federal cops on the corporate
crime beat.
6. Fighting for the last billionaire and multimillionaire, Republicans
are blocking ending Bush’s tax cuts on incomes beyond $250,000 per year.
Yes, Republicans want to reduce the deficit yet they want to end
revenues of over 700 billion dollar over ten years of restored
super-rich taxes. They are blocking renewal of the estate taxes after
their expiration on Dec. 31, 2009 left no taxes this year on the estates
of the super-rich. (Over 99 percent of estates were already exempt from
the federal estate tax.)
7. No matter that Republicans caved to the health insurance companies
getting over 30 million new covered customers, starting in 2014, they
supported the industry’s blaming the federal government, no less, for
this month’s latest sharp hike in insurance premiums by Aetna and others
largely on the policies of individuals and small business. The
Republicans did this after blocking the “public option” that would have
given consumers both a choice and the benefit of some competition to the
big insurance firms.
8. Have the Congressional Republicans ever challenged the bloated,
wasteful, contractor-corrupt military budget that makes up half of the
entire government’s discretionary budget?
Even the Congress’s own auditing agency—the Government Accountability
Office (GAO) declares the Pentagon budget unauditable. Many Pentagon
audits document the abuses of Halliburton, KBR, Blackwater and other
firms in the deficit-driving, bloody Iraq and Afghanistan wars (both
Republican espoused.) The Pentagon’s burgeoning budget, now nearing $800
billion a year, is deemed untouchable. (A few Republicans, like Charles
Grassley and John McCain sometimes object to contracting abuses.)
9. President Obama wants a counter-recessionary public works program
renovating airports, bridges, highways, rail and mass transit, drinking
water and sewage treatment facilities and other infrastructures.
Republicans sneer at this local job creation for much needed facilities.
10. Unlike any Republican Party since its creation in 1854, it has
misused the filibuster threat, and any one of its Senators misuse the
rules and block even going to a floor discussion or a nomination vote.
The Party is earning its moniker as the Party of NO. Republicans have
turned the U.S. Senate into America’s graveyard.
There is much more, but enough has been cited to ask again—how are
Republicans seen by the polls as front runners in the upcoming election?
The answer my friends, is not in the stars. The answer is in the
clueless and spineless Democrats, busily dialing for the same corporate
campaign dollars.
The other answer is in the ten percent of the actual voters who need to
seriously avail themselves of the facts and a modicum of thought. For if
they don’t, they will continue to pay bills handed to them and their
children by their ruling corporatists in Republican clothing.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


415 Comments so far
Show AllA tragic response from Nader … from the “two sides of the same coin” mantra to the”lesser of two evils”.
It would have been better for Nader to say nothing at all … This is just an endorsement of failure at a slower pace …
Sadly, I agree.
CNR,
Hi. I enjoy your posts.
No. I am not working with any parties now. I left the Dems and registered Independent.
I certainly would love to join a meaningful organization. I thought about the Greens, but they're not very active in my state.
CNR,
Thank you.
Here's a good book you and others here might enjoy:
THE OBAMA SYNDROME by Tariq Ali.
Try the Green Party again ... Obama's betrayal and insults have ignited a whole new group of people ...
I'll look into it--thank you.
Quannah and Pelican Beak would be whooping you for saying that. Getting tired of spamming for the Green Party?
Re:"It would have been better for Nader to say nothing at all … This is just an endorsement of failure at a slower pace …"
He just being practical and realistic. If the only choice is between hitting the violence wall at 120mph during the next generation, or hitting it at 60mph during the generation after that, I'll vote for slower, later.
Hello Pelican Beak ... Checks from the DLC still a comin' ?
you imagine that people who disagree with you must be PAID to do so?
Hahahahahahaha.
Don't hurt your shoulder, patting yourself on the back. Hey, you're not alone on this site. Plenty of looney paranoids who believe in "paid posters" without proving it.
No, actually, I consider you an operative for very good reasons ... First time in years I have said so on the net ...
Your tone and content are nothing short of propaganda straight from the party you shill for ... The Democratic DLC hegemony ...
Re:"No, actually, I consider you an operative for very good reasons ..."
Prove it.
Re:"Your tone and content are nothing short of propaganda straight from the party you shill for ... The Democratic DLC hegemony ..."
Ah, association fallacies. Goto love that knowledge Jake newton powered me up with. Damn I love laffing at those looney postings. What a cartoon !
You've done nothing but disrespect others who aren't Obama drones on Alternet as "Pelican Beak" or on this site as "Shawn Berry". You two deserve each other. Oh and I still have proof that you and Pelican are related.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/08-4
Shawn Berry. March 8th, 2010 9:02 pm
Nope, Pelican Beak is another guy I invited from Huffington Post and I'm going to invite more people over from Huffington Post and Daily Kos. I told you change is coming to CD but you wouldn't listen but now you'll learn so take that !
Pelican Beak March 9th, 2010 10:53 am
Not quite, Lex the Loser. Shawn Berry is a campaign fundraising friend of mine. He is involved with the Democratic Party of MN while I am involved with the Democratic Party of OR but we get together sometimes and meet up. I had advised Shawn to stop being too nice on this site and counter the Obama bashing and raise awareness for taking action.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
You both gave yourselves away assuming that it's two people and not one disguised as two. So how's that Democratic Party fundraising going?
Many thanks Lex Thomas ...
Quannah, Pelican Beak, Shawn Berry are all the same or operatives and have devoted themselves to getting me banned from sites where I post ... And they are in cahoots on cheating the Disqus scoring system on Alternet ... Many days they rack up over a hundred points having few if any points ... By posting many dozens of times they can then go back days, weeks to give themselves even more points ...
Again ... thanks
PS add Gregg R and salty to the list ... the DLC are holding a convention here!
mmckinl, actually it is worse. No more Chris Hedges or Glenn Greenwald articles and too many status quo apologist authors, not that Nader is one of them, seem to have gotten the Democrat partisan bot trolls too motivated to rub salt on our wounds.
P.S.: I am sorry to hear that Alternet has banned you. Their articles totally stink of party apologia that they are not even worth responding to as if the apologist articles here weren't annoying and irritating enough. It could be sinking into the next fluffpost site. :(
Alternet has not banned me ...
Through their insulting language they are hoping I say something that will get me banned ... I have had one post removed ... for calling someone a prostitute while their banality and insults raged ...
There is also their gaming of the Disqus point system ... Posting dozens of times getting few points they then return days or weeks later to pad their total.
I can only hope that once these elections are over these trolls go back into the holes.
I am glad Alternet didn't ban you but I know nothing about their new rating system. I haven't had much of a chance to talk with Quannah but about a month ago, she and I had a friendly exchange as I would relate my experiences in Europe to the issues. I think that she is reasonable but I would have to go back and look more into the conversations you and her had. She supported Ralph Nader in 2000 but went Democrat after that probably because of fear of the Republicans. My uncle told me that she is not an Obama apologist per say. As for Pelican Beak and Shawn Berry, those two are too much to bear. I had enough with PB last year on Alternet and I saw his stupid misjudgment of me. He can rot in hell for all I care and I don't believe his phony story about taking care of his mother. In any case, all we can do is get ready for yet another depressing election. ::(
After bringing up Quannah, PB and Shawn suddenly their "friends network" at Alternet on Disqus was deleted of all names ... there were 4 or 5 people on it ...
I don't trust her as she is the worst of the bunch trying to get me banned ... She is the one who got my post taken down ... I don't trust her credibility one bit ...
As you can see above Shawn Berry links Pelican Beak and Quannah in the same sentence. This is too much of a coincidence as Pelican Beak was, before deletions, a "friend" of Quannah on Disqus ...
This whole charade reminds me of the DIGG scandal... of course not as important, but the mechanics of the thing are very similar ...
mmckinl and JB, glad to be back after a long time in hell. I wonder if "Beck" will be showing up. "Beck" always showed hate for Nader on Alternet.
Speaking of PB, I found him trolling again with SB. He's more dangerous against women than you know. You can see his comments on
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/08/26-1
Here's another one of his trolling days
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/16-4
So what if I give a little to some progressive Democrats? I don't donate to blue dog demos.
Lex,
Bravo!
C :)
That's Obomber; disrespect intended
I think it's highly likely that one or more of the posters here who push for a 3rd party option are paid or unpaid republican shills.
Yawn. This accusation comes up pretty much whenever the Dems are criticized from the left.
I'm curious if you don't care how many republican troll disruptors are here, or if you think they are too busy tea baggin'?
You sound exactly like Pelican Beak from Alternet. Are you and Shawn borrowing his scripts by any chance? I'm smelling fowl play here.
Now why would Republicans come here anyway and why do you, Shawn, and Pelican keep insisting that all third party voters are Republican? If you wanna help the Democratic Party, then stop blaming Nader or anyone else.
I can't speak for others, but I've never even thought, let alone insisted, that all 3rd party voters are republicans. That seems like a truly insane idea. Why wouldn't some republicans come here to stir things up a bit? And what's with the chicken reference? ('fowl' play). If that was meant as an insult, sir, then I am truly almost a tiny little bit offended.
I had no intention of insulting, just asking but thanks for answering.
They're probably out campaigning for Republican candidates right now. It's a much more productive use of their time.
Shawn,
Here is a little evidence to support that paid trolling does indeed exist.
The Canadian gov't is doing it... http://www.news1130.com/news/national/
article/58287--harper-government-
monitoring-online-chats-about-politics
The US Air Force is doing it... http://www.wired.com/dangerroom
/2009/01/usaf-blog-respo/
The Israeli gov't is doing it... http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition
/news/israel-recruits-army-of-bloggers-
to-combat-anti-zionist-web-sites-1.268393
Corporations are doing it... http://www.guardian.co.uk
/politics/2002/may/14/greenpolitics.digitalmedia
The Pentagon hires military analysts to go onto mainstream TV news station to influence public opinion.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/
20generals.html?_r=2&hp=&adxnnl=
1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1208689421-
TZiKAoZH6DkPNLF7T7PORw
I'm nowhere near any of them places. Now about those sites.
The Canadian gov't is doing it...
http://www.news1130.com/news/national/article
/58287--harper-government-monitoring-online-chats-about-politics
It just says a media company but gives no name or why that media company accepted the deal. The Internet is open and free for anyone to read and respond.
The US Air Force is doing it... http://www.wired.com/dangerroom
/2009/01/usaf-blog-respo/
Nothing to suggest that they pay them to post. The diagram looks suspect to call it official.
The Israeli gov't is doing it... http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition
/news/israel-recruits-army-of-bloggers-
to-combat-anti-zionist-web-sites-1.268393
Just an allegation but that was posted on Jan 2009. No updates to confirm or deny it after that.
Re:"Corporations are doing it... http://www.guardian.co.uk
/politics/2002/may/14/greenpolitics.digitalmedia"
Has nothing to do with "paid trolling" on the forums. Monbiot assumes too much of the worst if he doesn't get his answer.
Re:"The Pentagon hires military analysts to go onto mainstream TV news station to influence public opinion.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/
20generals.html?_r=2&hp=&adxnnl=
1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1208689421-
TZiKAoZH6DkPNLF7T7PORw"
That doesn't prove that paid trolling exists. Pentagon has always sent people to talk on TV even before the Internet came.
If I was paid to post here, I'd be a millionaire. But there'd be millions of Americans getting that job before I'd qualify. I would be interested in seeing what Jake Newton has to say about those sites.
LMAO!
Yeah, they must be getting paid or laid to be spreading this pro-Dem Party BS.
NEWSFLASH: The Dems ARE the ugly Repugs!
A lot of people are so darn opinionated that they might well PAY a fee to express themselves.
Where is Nader endorsing "failure at a slower pace"?
Nader should have said vote third party but he didn't even mention third parties ... that omission should tell you everything ...
Re:"that omission should tell you everything ..."
That third parties can never win.
Exactly ... Berry shows up as Pelican Beak and other such characters and poops the Dem Party propaganda all over the postings ...
That's why we Greens have to replace the Dems ...
Americans Renew Call for Third Party
http://www.gallup.com/poll/143051/Americans-Renew-Call-Third-Party.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=syndication&utm_content=morelink&utm_term=Government%20-%20Political%20Parties%20-%20Politics%20-%20USA
"Fifty-eight percent of Americans believe a third major political party is needed because the Republican and Democratic Parties do a poor job of representing the American people."
Have fun getting together with those tea baggers. mmckinl I hope you're not a member of a minority.
Contributing member of the Green Party dear boy ...
Jesus! ... the Dem DLC operatives are coming out of the woodwork ...
I'm only an operative in spirit (half-hearted at that). My point was that your mentioning 58% wanting a 3rd party alternative includes a very diverse group: Birchers and t bags, anarchists and communists, etc.
So, you falsely represented what Nader said. That's really too bad. And for no logical reason whatsoever.
You're not following the thread.
Dude, I asked, 'Where is Nader endorsing "failure at a slower pace"?' mmckinl responded with an what you're accusing me of--an evasion: "Nader should have said vote third party but he didn't even mention third parties ... that omission should tell you everything." Nowhere did Nader endorse "failure at a slowewr pace;" rather, both you and mmckinl read something that was totally unstated, not even implied, in the essay. And you compounded the problem by not following the thread from its start. But enough of this silly squabble.
I will not vote for the corrupt system in Washington because that is like voting for cancer. Barack Obama and the Democrats sold out the People. The Republicans sold out the People. Obama wants to privatize social security, the schools, and who knows what else. He single handedly removed single payer health care from consideration. Huge sums of money were spent on Bankers and Insurance Companies and very little by comparison on solving the foreclosure problem or providing jobs. No I will not vote for a Republican or Democrat. To hell with them all. Attempting to place fear of Republicans in the hearts of Democrats will not work this time. It's over!
Indeed ... vote FOR the Party not against the other Party ...
"Stone"
I mostly agree, but I would caution you to remember that Obama is just one of the many corporate tools in the democrat toolbox. In a way, Obama is there to distract us. So many good-intentioned people worry about what the republicans will do that they don't pay close enough attention to the deviousness of the majority of democrats.
I want my vote back I wasted on this President.
I agree with you on that. He folds like a house off cards every time the repubs yell at him.
While I don't disagree with Nader on the necessity of uniting to defeat the GOP, I have to say that this article coming from Nader is rich, indeed.