Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
‘They Kill Alex’
Carlos Arredondo, a native Costa Rican,
stands in a parking lot of a Holiday Inn in Portland, Maine, next to his
green Nissan pickup truck. The truck, its tailgate folded down, carries
a flag-draped coffin and is adorned with pictures of his son, Lance
Cpl. Alexander S. Arredondo, 20, a Marine killed in Iraq in 2004. The
truck and a trailer he pulls with it have become a mobile shrine to his
boy. He drives around the country, with the aid of donations, evoking a
mixture of sympathy and hostility. There are white crosses with the
names of other boys killed in the war. Combat boots are nailed to the
side of the display. There is a wheelchair, covered in colored ribbons,
fixed to the roof of the cab. There is Alex's military uniform and
boots, poster-size pictures of the young Marine shown on the streets of
Najaf, in his formal Marine portrait,
and then lying, his hands folded in white gloves, in his coffin. A
metal sign on the back of the truck bears a gold star and reads: "USMC
L/CPL ALEXANDER S. ARREDONDO."
"This is what happens every week to some family in America," says Carlos. "This is what war does. And this is the grief and pain the government does not want people to see."
Alex, from a working-class immigrant family, was lured into the military a month before Sept. 11, 2001. The Marine recruiters made the usual appeals to patriotism, promised that he would be trained for a career, go to college and become a man. They included a $10,000 sign-on bonus. Alex was in the Marine units that invaded Iraq. His father, chained to the news reports, listening to the radio and two televisions at the same time, was increasingly distraught. "I hear nothing about my son for days and days," he says. "It was too much, too much, too much for parents."
Alex, in August 2004, was back in Iraq for a second tour. In one of his last phone calls, Alex told him: "Dad, I call you because, to say, you know, we've been fighting for many, many days already, and I want to tell you that I love you and I don't want you to forget me." His father answered: "Of course I love you, and I don't want-I never forget you." The last message the family received was an e-mail around that time which read: "Watch the news online. Check the news, and tell everyone that I love them."
Twenty days later, on Aug. 25, a U.S. government van pulled up in front of Carlos' home in Hollywood, Fla. It was Carlos' 44th birthday and he was expecting a birthday call from Alex. "I saw the van and thought maybe Alex had come home to surprise me for my birthday or maybe they were coming to recruit my other son, Brian," he says. Three Marine officers climbed out of the van. One asked, "Are you Carlos Arredondo?" He answered "yes."
"I'm sorry, we're here to notify you about the death of Lance Cpl. Arredondo," one of the officers told him. Alex was the 968th soldier or Marine to be killed in the Iraq war.
"I tried to process this in my head," Carlos says. "I never hear that. I remember how my body felt. I got a rush of blood to my body. I felt like it's the worst thing in my life. It is my worst fear. I could not believe what they were telling me."
Carlos turned and ran into the house to find his mother, who was in the kitchen making him a birthday cake. "I cried, ‘Mama! Mama! They are telling me Alex got killed! Alex got killed! They kill Alex! They kill Alex! They kill Alex!" His mother crumbled in grief. Carlos went to the large picture of his son in the living room and held it. Carlos asked the Marines to leave several times over the next 20 minutes, but the Marines refused, saying they had to wait for his wife. "I did this because I was in denial. I think if they leave none of this will happen." Crazed and distraught with grief, the father went into his garage and took out five gallons of gasoline and a propane torch. He walked past the three Marines in their dress blues and began to smash the windows of the government van with a hammer.
"I went into the van," he says. "I poured gasoline on the seats. I pour gasoline on the floor and in the gas tank. I was, like, looking for my son. I was screaming and yelling for him. I remember that one day he left in a van and now he's not there. I destroy everything. The pain I feel is the pain of what I learned from war. I was wearing only socks and no shoes. I was wearing shorts. The fumes were powerful and I could not breathe no more, even though I broke the windows."
As Carlos stepped out of the van, he ignited the propane torch inside the vehicle. It started a fire that "threw me from the driver's seat backwards onto the ground." His clothes caught fire. It felt "like thousands of needles stabbing into my body." He ran across the street and fell onto the grass. His mother followed him and pulled off his shirt and socks, which were on fire, as he screamed "Mama! Mama! My feet are burning! My feet are burning!" The Marines dragged him away and he remembers one of them saying, "The van is going to blow! The van is going to blow!" The van erupted in a fireball and the rush of hot air, he says, swept over him. The Marines called a fire truck and an ambulance. Carlos sustained second- and third-degree burns over 26 percent of his body. As I talk to him in the Portland parking lot he shows me the burn scars on his legs. The government chose not to prosecute him.
"I wake up in the hospital two days later and I was tied with tubes in my mouth," he says. "When they take the tubes out I say, ‘I want to be with my son. I want to be with my son.' Somebody was telling me my son had died. I get very emotional. I kept saying ‘I want to be with my son' and they think I want to commit suicide."
He had no health insurance. His medical bills soon climbed to $55,000. On Sept. 2, 2004, Carlos, transported in a stretcher, attended his son's wake at the Rodgers Funeral Home in Jamaica Plain, Mass. He lifted himself, with the help of those around him, from his stretcher, and when he reached his son's open casket he kissed his child. "I held his head and when I put my hands in the back of his head I felt the huge hole where the sniper bullet had come out," he says. "I climbed into the casket. I lay on top of my son. I apologized to him because I did not do enough to avoid this."
Arredondo began to collect items that memorialized his son's life. He tacked them to his truck. A funeral home in Boston donated a casket to the display. He began to attend anti-war events, at times flying the American flag upside down to signal distress. He has taken his shrine to the Mall in Washington, D.C., and Times Square in New York City. He has traveled throughout the country presenting to the public a visual expression of death and grief. He has placed some of his son's favorite childhood toys and belongings in the coffin, including a soccer ball, a pair of shoes, a baseball and a Winnie the Pooh. The power of his images, which force onlookers to confront the fact that the essence of war is death, has angered some who prefer to keep war sanitized and wrapped in the patriotic slogans of glory, honor and heroism. Three years ago vandals defaced his son's gravestone.
"I don't speak," he says. "I show people war. I show them the caskets they are not allowed to see. If people don't see what war does they don't feel it. If they don't feel it they don't care."
Military recruiters, who often have offices in high schools, prey on young men like Alex, who was first approached when he was 16. They cater to their insecurities, their dreams and their economic deprivation. They promise them what the larger society denies them. Those of Latino descent and from divorced families, as Alex was, are especially vulnerable. Alex's brother Brian was approached by the military, which suggested that if he enlisted he could receive $60,000 in signing bonuses and more than $27,000 in payments for higher education. The proposed Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, or DREAM Act, is designed to give undocumented young people a chance at citizenship provided they attend college-not usually an option for poor, often poorly educated and undocumented Latino youths who are prohibited from receiving Pell grants-for at least two years, or enlist and serve in the military. The military helped author the pending act and is lobbying for it. Twelve percent of Army enlistees are Hispanic, and this percentage is expected to double by 2020 if the current rate of recruitment continues. And once they are recruited, these young men and women are trained to be killers, sent to wars that should never be fought and returned back to their families often traumatized and broken and sometimes dead.
Alex told Carlos in their last conversation there was heavy fighting in Najaf. Alex usually asked his father not to "forget" him, but now, increasingly in the final days of his life, another word was taking the place of forget. It was forgive. He felt his father should not forgive him for what he was doing in Iraq. He told his father, "Dad, I hope you are proud of what I'm doing. Don't forgive me, Dad." The sentence bewildered his father. "Oh my God, how can I forgive you? ... I love you, you're my son, very proud, you're my son."
"I thought, when he died, my God, he has killed somebody," Carlos says quietly as he readied for an anti-war march organized by Veterans for Peace. "He feels guilty. If he returned home his mind would be destroyed. His heart would be torn apart. It is not normal to kill. How can they do this? How can they take our children?"




111 Comments so far
Show AllKey sentence:
"They promise them what the larger society denies them."
The military's enrollment success is a function of there being a large divide between the haves and have-nots; it depends on there being a social order that denies much to most and keeps them that way, and on a societal mechanism that constantly reproduces the conditions that keep most in a state of deprivation, want, insecurity, and anxiety about their livelihood. And, for some years now, this category of people upon whom the military preys includes illegal aliens, the carrot being that if an illegal alien joins the military, his worries about not being a legitimate resident will be alleviated. By thus drawing on the large pool of illegal residents, the military de facto accepts and even encourages their existence.
>>
"I thought, when he died, my God, he has killed somebody," Carlos says quietly as he readied for an anti-war march organized by Veterans for Peace. "He feels guilty. If he returned home his mind would be destroyed. His heart would be torn apart. It is not normal to kill. How can they do this? How can they take our children?"
<<
Soldiers kill. That is their job. They don't "help" people in countries they invade. They kill them. That is their job.
There is a basic decency inside of almost all human beings.
The oligarchy knows this, that's why they expend so much effort to hide the effect of their crimes from the people.
Sometimes we on the left allow our frustration to lead us down the wrong track.
'The people' aren't stupid. They've been assidously, carefully and at great expense, misinformed and mislead
'The people' aren't complacent, they're confused, harassed and uninspired.
If we can learn how to remove those barriers, the revolution that is within will be liberated.
iowapinko: I agree with your post. At every turn, people in this country are mentally assaulted -- they are losing their jobs, they are losing their homes, they have already lost their savings and retirement, health insurance costs continue to rise, etc. Their general well-being is in serious jeopardy. I can't help but feel that many people are suffering from, at the very least, a low-grade PTSD.
"'The people' aren't complacent, they're confused, harassed and uninspired." -- iowapinko
Exactly! And, where can they turn? When your life is disintegrating around you, and is in complete shambles, there is little time for reflection or anything beyond the daily grind. Kids still have to be fed, etc.
I agree with both you and iowapinko. The kids that enlist are brainwashed after they enlist, but more importantly they have already been brainwashede by government/corporate fascist propaganda and a failing economy unless one is in the top 1%, just like so many others of us.
The pushers of Death, so called recruiters, lowest scum of humankind, are totally guilty in the terrorist acts of fascist amerika !
They are brainwashed well before enlisting. They are trained to kill after enlisting. Public school education is nothing but an indoctrination camp into support for the federal government and empire. It was purposefully copied from the Prussian model of public schooling. The Prussians began public schooling after losing to Napoleon... The German Army's performance at Waterloo deemed it a success. research John Taylor Gatto's work
As I have said in prior posts here, the majority of the people in this country is being battered on a daily basis by its material and societal circumstances, and by the brutally ideological regime under which we all live.
I agree with you, too ip.
Its very disconcerting to see people of color--especially latinos--being sucked into this wicked machine of ours. I get the feeling this is the general plan by Washington in order to keep the ranks filled. They place a man of color in the highest office in the land and expect the kids to follow him. And they do.
The whole thing seems kinda creepy.
I am gladdened to read that I am not alone in believing there is good in most of us. There is far,far too much divisiveness amidst the Left, thus keeping us out of power. I sometimes wonder whether we are being manipulated soas to remain separate....
It is outrageous that the recruiters of our Imperial Armed Forces have been enabled by Congress to prey on the patriotic naiveté of manipulatable children and teenagers...it must stop.
I entirely agree with the thrust of Chris Hedges' article and the anger of Mr. Arredondo yet I feel compelled to note the humanity of those soldiers who were assigned the task of notifying him. All they had to do was call 9-11 when their van was being torched and you know how this story would have ended. They stuck with their true duty all the way, and no charges were pressed by anyone. In this day and age, such minimal mercies are extraordinary. Would that these useless, savage wars might have been stopped before they layed waste to so many people's lives.
Tony Vodvarka
"abvodvarka"
I am sorry to say that the "minimal mercies" were most likely the result of the Pentagon wanting to minimize the publicity. Who knows what stories of desperately furious reactions we are not hearing.
Just like the lack of images of the coffins, we do not see them because it reflects badly on the agenda.
"...yet I feel compelled to note the humanity of those soldiers who were assigned the task of notifying him. All they had to do was call 9-11 when their van was being torched and you know how this story would have ended."
abvodvarka...go back and look at that paragraph.
"The Marines called a fire truck and an ambulance."
Of course they called 9-11. And still,
"The government chose not to prosecute him."
This was not due to the humanity of the soldiers who were assigned the task. It was not their decision to make. This was the decision of the cynical administrators and prosecutors well up the chain who were compelled to forego their blood-lust only by the absolute certainty of the overwhelmingly negative public relations (and the high probability of a jury-acquittal) would have brought down on the government.
I am not making any judgement.
Perhaps I don't know what I'm talking about.
As I read this, one question and numerous possible answers rose above any others in my brain.
Why are there not, all across this nation, thousands of grief stricken parents and family members ardently protesting like Carlos Arredondo and Cindy Sheehan?
Birdbrain Alley, I totally agree with your question, why are Carlos and Cindy almost alone in expressing the natural outrage and grief that surely all parents feel?
If we knew the answer, perhaps we'd be closer to stopping wars in the first place as I somehow believe the two issues are connected.
I would refer you and Birdbrain Alley to the two comments above by (iowapinko September 6th, 2010 12:25 pm) and (Kay Johnson September 6th, 2010 12:39 pm).
Many of them are convinced that their children have honorably and rightfully served their country. They might likely feel ashamed to allow their true feelings of anger and sadness out in public.
If parents felt outrage and protested, that would mean they would have to admit that their son/daughter died for nothing. Not many parents would want to go that far. The community that surrounds the family also insists the young person sacrificed himself for the rest of us. They reinforce the narrative maintained by the government and the media. To question that narrative by protesting war puts the antiwar activist in danger--ostracism, failure to get a promotion, intentional damage to property, all the way to physical violence are all possible and sometimes likely. Everyone is buffaloed into accepting the "freedom isn't free" load of crap that is dispensed by militarists. It's a powerful dynamic and few will oppose it.
"drosera"
Your response was part of what went through my brain.
My question was a reflection of my sadness and, I guess (because I'm uncertain if this is even correct), rhetorical -in that there are too many lives and too many answers and all of the grief was/is unnecessary.
Thanks.
DROSERA: I would like to challenge and/or invite you to read what the poster Loren Bliss presented on the following thread: "Report: States Pass Staggering Array of Anti-Choice Laws." It's on the left hand column of the CD site, and was posted last Friday.
This individual is a genius. He argues/articulates points I've sought to make. His are backed by deep scholarship.
When I read his posts I thought of you... and how much you would stand to gain from considering the perspective he eloquently relates.
Gee, SR, it is nice to know you are thinking of ways to enlighten me. Thanks. I did read the post of Loren Bliss and it certainly is an eloquent exposition of the idea that the patriarchal God of Moses is on the side of capitalism, if not its progenitor--much to the detriment of Gaia and other conceptions of a female goddess. The discussion centers around Western history with its evocation of the Christian God--so I would look outside Western tradition to ask: Are there civilizations with another concept of God that also demonstrates the brutality of capitalism?
I would look to China. I would not describe the economic system of China over the past two thousand years as totally capitalist: there is a question about encouragement of open markets, for one thing. The country did have underpaid artisans, corvee labor, an enormous separation of wealth between rich and poor, a very early move towards mass production, a tendency towards gaining a monopoly within a specific industry, and a society-wide lionization of the wealthy. For good reason the New Year's wish is translated "May you achieve happiness and wealth" in the next year.
China did not have a single patriarchal god. It started out with a sensible religion of Taoism--in which Yin (seen as more than just female) is balanced against Yang (which is more than just male). Confucianism, also practiced from very early times, was about ethical behavior. My point is: If a society shows many of the traits of the ugly system of capitalism we now possess and is not a society based upon a patriarchal conception of God, then the form of religious faith may not be related to the economic system that is practiced.
Thinking always about your (and my) intellectual and "spiritual" advancement,
drosera
I read that article and responded to LB myself. I hope nobody ever finds a way to make men pregnant in my lifetime. I don't see myself good at handling pregnancy as a man. I would hate to see the militant "feminists" having field days with pregnant men.
If men could be pregnant, they would actually learn to have more respect for women and not put them through pain and stress even when pregnant. There would also be fewer men inclined to go to war. This would be ideal solution for the "pro-lifers" and the rest of us who are sick and tired of wars and destruction.
Margaret Thatcher, Hillary Clinton, and Nancy Pelosi, have gotten pregnant had had children.
They would send people off to war being war puppets. Carla was referring to a different matter. She was probably upset about the way men legislate control over women's bodies with pregnancy being the most obvious. Who can blame her for saying what she said?
Since I read the article SR referred to, Loren Bliss's comments on it, and MB's response to LB, I would add that the nincompoops trying to equate fetuses with "life" would be far fewer if men were also capable of being pregnant instead of idiotic statements about fetuses having feelings when there is no way feelings can exist until the child is born and only after the child becomes aware of life can he or she develop feelings. In other words, there is no way a pre-born being can have feelings until after it is born.
Hey, abortion is a sin, but is is totally acceptable to Predator Drone a happy wedding party where Jesus is turning water into wine.
"A great many of the nincompoops equating fetushood with life are indeed women."
Not where I'm at but I live in the Deep South. There are conservative women, yeah. But 4 out of 5 uttering the fetushood bs are male and it's not just white male conservatives. I've heard even black male liberals buy into the rightwing nonsense on abortion.
"And despite the difficulty of escaping a religious upbringing and society (I have firsthand experience of it), should we not hold people individually responsible for the irrational beliefs they maintain as adults?"
Yes but if they can be reformed to think differently, it might not be necessary.
China may not have had a single patriarchal god but it doesn't get much more patriarchal than China. Girls have been killed at birth for years and sons prized above all else. The interesting paradox here is that China has not had a nature hating a culture as the west and yet is equally woman hating.
Don't the Chinese run rough-shod over the environment nowadays? That Tang poetry and Zen and painting and gardens were just what the elite did back then. Peasants were too busy making rice paddies, killing off tigers for their reputed medicinal virtues, irrigating hell out of every last hectare, and denuding most of China of its forests. Don't think that 'love of nature' went far beyond the literati.
He is a friend of mine, and I agree with you SR.
Interesting points, drosera.
The community I am in has lost quite a few young men to the wars. Rural and urban poor people are disproportionately shouldering the burdens and suffering the consequences.
I would caution you though, when you suggest that the relative silence from the families who have lost soldiers suggests that they are brainwashed or supportive of the wars. They do not approach politics as a matter of self expression. They oppose the wars, which is a big reason that rural counties across the Midwest went Democratic in the last two elections for the first time in decades - in the (now utterly dashed) hope that the wars would end.
The person killed in the wars did sacrifice themselves for the rest of us, by the way.
I remember a couple of interesting polls at DU a few years ago that appeared within a day of each other. One asked "would you place your life for your country?" and the other asked "are you willing to go to jail for your political principles?" In both cases almost everyone answered "no!" emphatically to both questions.
Only in progressive and liberal circles is it necessary to explain the significance of those poll results. If one is not willing to place themselves at risk for the greater good (presumably because they have political disagreements with the regime in power) yet also are unwilling to make even a minimal personal sacrifice to change conditions, they cannot be taken seriously when they express political opinions. If the current power structure is so bad that one is willing to let others die to defend it and not consider placing themselves at risk, would it not then be incumbent upon them to risk arrest - at the very least - to change it? Both cannot be true - the system cannot be so bad that we refuse to protect it, and yet not bad enough that we would place ourselves at risk to end it. There can be no middle ground, other than for the privileged and fortunate, the cowards and hypocrites.
The irony is that many of the same people will lecture others about the personal choices they are making, and claim that social and political change can come - will only come - if each of us change our personal lifestyles.
This blatant and obvious hypocrisy and moral depravity is the main cause of people being driven to vote Republican.
Two,
In my community a soldier was killed in Afghanistan recently and there was a great outpouring of patriotic feeling to the effect that the young man had sacrificed himself for us all. Hundreds--if not thousands--of people expressed this sentiment. They came to the airport, many dressed in camouflage, waving flags, most having driven enormous vehicles and saluted in silence as the vehicle carrying his body set forth to the small town in which he was raised. These are salt-of-the-earth folks--and their conviction that their sons and daughters are sacrificing themselves for a government they don't trust points to a huge contradiction. They are confused, weeping for the young man they knew so well and despising the government at the same time. The best approach--I think--is to give them time to make sense out of it all. Kicking dirt on the values they hold dear will only anger them more. They will figure it out, though it might take a while.
That said, I do not believe we should give in to those that preach the necessity of violence and war. Speaking out against military recruiters, speaking out publicly to oppose views that support the military, speaking to student groups--all of these things take courage. I honor those that do them. At the same time, opposition to the military cannot be so "in your face" that the small town relatives of the dead soldier are infuriated to the point of inflicting violence on people they see as their attackers. There has to be civility. At least that is what I think.
Understood. I don't disagree with anything you say here.
I hold that there is nothing wrong with the values of self-sacrifice and commitment to protecting the community.
What is it we would have people "figure out?" They already know that the imperialist wars are "a rich man's war and a poor man's fight." That is far more radical a view than most gentrified liberals and progressives take. They serve anyway. It is a conundrum. The ideals of self sacrifice and service are in collision with class warfare. We are all caught in that conundrum. We all serve the empire, we all make accommodations with the ruling class. We all comply and submit. I have more respect for those who serve the empire by putting their life on the line than I do for upscale liberals who profit from the system, who are personally safe and comfortable, and who do yeoman's duty rationalizing and justifying empire and Capitalism. They do more damage, cause more wars, and yet risk far less.
Those making hay out of patriotism and the military, saber rattling and talking tough and posing as super-patriotic, like the right wing pundits in the media, are most often those whom Lincoln described as "invincible in peace and invisible in war." In other words, they are hypocrites, blowing a lot of hot air and belligerent talk but unwilling to make any personal sacrifice. For example, hardly any of the war mongers in the previous administration ever served in the armed forces themselves.
Too many liberals and progressives blame the working class people, especially those at the bottom of the economy, for the actions of the ruling class.
Is the ethical element working class soldiers have (which liberals do not) called "duty"? They see college-educated liberal types as lacking in that virtue. On the other hand, liberals cannot understand duty without examining what it is you are pledging your trust to. As you mentioned, liberals do not have to demonstrate their commitment to anything. They should do something that proves they care about society, something more than writing posts at a blog, adding their names to an online petition, or contributing a couple of bucks to their favorite liberal causes.
I think that is a good description of the issue, yes.
As those two polls at one of the biggest liberal online sites illustrates, there is a pervasive hypocrisy. If one does not feel that the country is worth risking anything for, because of the rulers, would it not then follow that one would place themselves at risk in order to overthrow those rulers? If one will do neither, that then is the upper class WASP mentality being revealed, the Capitalist boss mentality - aloof and disengaged, in a supervisory and technocratic role, forcing others to do the dirty work, assuming a position of moral superiority, subscribing to the Protestant doctrine that individual conscience - personal beliefs - trump everything else, the rugged individualism of Anglo-Saxon Capitalism and imperialism.
Liberals do not need to prove they care about society. Prove to whom? The poor dumb suckers so that they will vote them into power? Prove to themselves to assuage their own conscience? It does not even matter if they "care." The only thing that matters is which side they are on.
Yes indeed, what you say is true. I know many people doing what you describe, and a long tradition for it sometimes associated with various ethnic groups and religions. I am completely sympathetic and supportive, I have no criticism for what you say here.
I have no problem with people making personal decisions and choices as you describe. I do object to that being presented as a political solution or program.
I would think many parents would not want to publicly display their failure and guilt in allowing their child to be recruited.
BbA, very good question. "If we knew the answer, perhaps we'd be closer to stopping wars in the first place as I somehow believe the two issues are connected." and insightful analysis.
I don't know the answer but have some thoughts:
1) There ARE more parents who question the senseless waste of their children, we just don't hear about it.
2) They've persecuted the parents who vocally protested and made their lives even more miserable, so it inhibits further protest.
3)The brainwashing has worked
The social stigma associated with questioning the military is very overwhelming. Having never lost a child this way, I can't fully comprehend the amount of grief parents must experience, but I imagine it would be incredibly difficult to summon the additional fortitude to take on the establishment at this terrible time. Plus there are financial issues to consider, and most of these families are not well-off.
I often wonder why more people didn't resist the nazis while they still had the opportunity to do so. Why there wasn't moreresistance to slavery in the US.
You're right, though, when we understand these issues more clearly, we will be a much stronger movement.
You ask: Why are there not, all across this nation, thousands of grief stricken parents and family members ardently protesting like Carlos Arredondo and Cindy Sheehan?
Because, a lot of people in the USA are very willing to sacrifice their loved ones to a false, made-up boogie man. Ignorance abounds.
paradox of deeds...
loyal young lie moments from... those fighting steps to death...
under names instilled within their brains... to have them 'be their best'...
they looked ahead from days now dead... insurance sold to youth...
invincible their young eyes saw... till blood men showed them truth...
how different front lines change the mind... from boot camps stamping 'follow me'...
when seeing skies through other eyes... becomes a lie in infantry...
surviving skills put to the test... in battles on his soul...
whip the dread of 'kill the rest'... which made the soldier whole...
lessons wrought when preachers taught... those kids their golden rule...
sneak outside from where they hide... like questions meant to fool...
down-sized arrows pierce inside... and hit the bull's-eye knot...
as leaking veins collapse in pain... leaving open wounds to rot...
what's left tides over soldier's time... treading water on a wave...
in seas of big shots' apathy... for finding ways to save...
false towers built by self-made power... crumble neath their spell...
of 'right is might' by some men's light... held in that height from hell...
tales tell them... 'do it well... as those before you did'...
while memories of old sympathies... emerge from where they hid...
the enemy's sight of family ties... gets beaten up by second-thoughts...
as faces lose the human race... when saving grace is the guy who lost...
blood lines to what's left behind... back in someone's home...
let the despair of not being there... drip on dying bones...
the war within the soldier's core... strips life from broken seed...
what they go through... for who knows who!?!... is the paradox of deeds!...
(things need to change to get better... lotsa stuff to do... keep telling the lawmakers... ((no matter when their terms come to an end... and hopefully better workers begin!))... to wake up this government!... to care about the basics!... and stop misleading!... and end all the war!... and don't waste anymore!...
and here's one of many links that can be used to do that... and get congressional information etc too)... http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials
(and there's lotsa other stuff to do too!)...
the best of wishes'n'ways'n'todays to each'n'everyone!... :)
Sally: I cried when I read this article by Hedges. Could feel the impossible pain of that poor father! And your poem (is it yours?) is quite good and truly moving.
Thank you for your post.
KAY JOHNSON: Wise words!
hiya siouxrose'n'all!... am glad ya appreciated my poem... the best of wishes'n'ways'n'todays to each'n'everyone!... :)
we must stop this world of power plays!...
it claims more innocent life each day!...
may awareness come to shine upon...
all hidden human common bonds!...
the best of wishes'n'ways'n'todays to each'n'everyone!... :)
What attracts many recruits is the fact that the U.S. military is the one socialist bastion in the U.S. Free medical and dental care, guaranteed pension, permanent employment and a host of other benefits that the "greater society" doesn't provide. The catch of course is that your job (besides guarding oil wells and pipelines) is to kill and destroy any pockets of socialism here and abroad.
Birdbrain Alley writes... " are there not, all across this nation, thousands of grief stricken parents and family members ardently protesting like Carlos Arredondo and Cindy Sheehan?"
Most Americans I know that have lost children in the wars talk about how proud they are that their son or daughter "died for their country". Patriotism trumps logic all too often. The successful corporate led campaign to misinform the general public resonates with most Americans to the point that people now associate anti-war sentiments with being unpatriotic. There are only a handful of enlightened people in a sea of ignorance.
SPACE: You make excellent points. As per your 3rd paragraph, the concept of patriotism itself is marinaded in blood. With war so embedded into the fabric of the nation's history, many of the boys (and now girls) who sign up do so because their fathers, brothers, uncles, and grandfathers "proudly served" their country, when in truth, as Smedley Butler & Jack Perkins exposed, they served as the muscle behind the trade deals that benefited only an amoral elite few.
Traditions work like magic to cast millions under their spell. So long as militarism remains touted as a brave, HONORABLE tradition, the sins of the fathers will be visited on the sons and endless rivers of blood, here and abroad, will continue to flow.
This is why it's so important to alter the concept of heroism, and untangle it from acts of war and naked aggression. It needs to be associated with selfless acts that improve the lives of others, especially those who own no political clout or pathway to beneficial change.
Excellent set of remarks, in particular on the currently totally distorted use of the notion of heroism.
And now, coal miners who die working in deliberately and recklessly unsafe conditions by management are "heroes" too. Come down to WV, go into a bar in, say, Beckley, and try criticizing Massey Energy Corporation. You will be told that you re "dishonoring' the "29 fallen heroes" of UBB, and asked to leave or they will call the police.
I'm not making this up.
According to the dominant ideology, anyone who sacrifies or is sacrified to promote the interests of the State and the corporate order it serves and enforces is a hero.
Not so.
There are two Americas - the ruling class and the working class. Progressives and liberals are the ones who confuse the two, who routinely see "America" as the ruling class. This is revealed when people say "we did such and such" when they mean "the ruling class did such and such," or say "America is such and such" when they are describing the ruling class.
Most who sacrifice themselves for the country are sacrificing themselves for the other America, the working class America. It is not up to them to decide what the ruling class does, and they don't presume to pick and choose about that. We - the intellectuals and commentators and readers and thinkers - are far more guilty of defending the ruling class than the soldier who serves could ever be. We are the ones steeped in the ruling class ideology, indoctrinated into it from a young age.
I can't make head or tails of what you wrote.
When a soldier, or now, a coal miner, is duped into becoming cannon or methane-blast fodder he is duped by the ruling class that he is doing it for his country - whatever that might mean.
And how can you assume that there is this elite "intellectuals and commentators and readers and thinkers" class that comprises those who comment here on CD?