EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- Naomi Klein: 'Anti-Shock Doctrines' Show the Way to Resist
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Awful Price for Teaching Less than We Know
Watching Glenn Beck's performance Saturday at his "Restoring Honor" rally in Washington, DC, I thought of the novelist Sinclair Lewis' Elmer Gantry, the charlatan evangelist who seduces most of those around him with his hearty backslapping and false piety.
Then I realized it wasn't Gantry of whom I was reminded so much as another Lewis character, Berzelius "Buzz" Windrip, the politician who poses as a populist, then once elected president turns the United States into a fascist dictatorship, aided by an angry, unknowing electorate and a paramilitary group called the Minute Men.
Read how Sinclair Lewis described Windrip seventy-five years ago in his novel It Can't Happen Here and think Beck: "He was an actor of genius. There was no more overwhelming actor on the stage, in the motion pictures, nor even in the pulpit. He would whirl arms, bang tables, glare from mad eyes, vomit Biblical wrath from a gaping mouth; but he would also coo like a nursing mother, beseech like an aching lover, and in between tricks would coldly and almost contemptuously jab his crowds with figures and facts -- figures and facts that were inescapable even when, as often happened, they were entirely incorrect."
Entirely incorrect. In its despair and confusion, a large segment of the American populace is prepared to believe anything it's told, in part because we are a country less and less educated, increasingly unable to tell fact from fiction because we are so unschooled in basic essential knowledge about America and the world/
I remembered a conversation my friend and colleague Bill Moyers had with journalist and author Susan Jacoby on Bill Moyers Journal in 2008, just after the publication of her book, The Age of American Unreason.
She cited a 2006 National Geographic-Roper Survey: "Only 23 percent of college-educated young people could find Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran and Israel, four countries of ultimate importance to American policy on the map -- a map, by the way, that had the countries lettered on it. So in other words, it wasn't a blank map, [which] meant they didn't really know where the Middle East was either... If only 23 percent of people with some college can find those countries on a map that is nothing to be bragging about. And that has to have something to do with why, as a country, we have such shallow political discussions."
It's not much of a leap from there to the Pew Research Center survey earlier this month reporting "nearly one-in-five Americans (18%) now say Obama is a Muslim, up from 11% in March 2009. Only about one-third of adults (34%) say Obama is a Christian, down sharply from 48% in 2009."
The jump in the "Obama is a Muslim" numbers is sharpest among Republicans (and a new Newsweek poll finds a majority of Republicans also believe that it's "definitely" or "probably" true that "Barack Obama sympathizes with Islamic fundamentalists who want to impose Islamic law around the world"). But as New York Times blogger Timothy Egan noted in an entry headlined, "Building a Nation of Know-Nothings," it's "not just that 46 percent of Republicans believe the lie that Obama is a Muslim, or that 27 percent in the party doubt that the president of the United States is a citizen. But fully half of them believe falsely that the big bailout of banks and insurance companies under TARP was enacted by Obama, and not by President Bush."
Back when Moyers spoke with Susan Jacoby about "the ignorance and erosion of historical memory that makes serious deceptions possible and plausible," she cited as an example that, "If we don't know what our Constitution says about the separation of powers then it certainly affects the way we decide all kinds of public issues."
According to a survey conducted last year by The American Revolution Center, a non-partisan, educational group, more than half of American adults "mistakenly believe the Constitution established a government of direct democracy, rather than a democratic republic," a third don't know that the right to trial-by-jury is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and "many more Americans remember that Michael Jackson sang 'Beat It' than know that the Bill of Rights is part of the Constitution." (Sixty percent knew that reality TV's Jon and Kate Gosselin had eight kids but more than a third did not know that the American Revolution took place in the 18th century.)
So is it any wonder that many Tea Partiers are equally unknowing of the fact that much of their grass roots movement is bankrolled by fat cats with ulterior motives like billionaire libertarians David Koch and his brother Charles, who, as a former associate told The New Yorker's Jane Mayer, seems to have "confused making money with freedom?" Or that continuing tax cuts for the rich while supporting deficit reduction are inherently incompatible concepts? Or that raging Islamophobia plays right into the hands of radical terrorists who use our bigotry to incite and recruit? Or that Glenn Beck just says whatever craziness pops into his head?
"It's one thing to forget the past, with predictable consequences, as the favorite aphorism goes," Timothy Egan wrote on the Times website. "But what about those who refuse to comprehend the present?"
Years ago, I attended a rally protesting government cuts in funding for education and the arts. One of the speakers suggested that we boomers may be the first generation to teach the next generation less than we know. That often-willful ignorance may turn out to be our final, fatal mistake, the greatest American tragedy of all.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



51 Comments so far
Show AllThe baby-boom generation was inundated with ridiculous propaganda too - remember the idiotic 'Red Scare' that went on for decades? Only those of us with first-hand knowledge ever knew the whole smear was a pack of lies, and that 'the common good' (and socialism of any kind) was the real target. Sure, we had geography classes - but propaganda made what we learned twisted and warped (unless we had educated parents). Education, in itself, is useless when propaganda twists reality into such contorted shapes - no change here...
"Only those of us with first-hand knowledge ever knew the whole smear was a pack of lies, and that 'the common good' (and socialism of any kind) was the real target."
Right you are, Mr. Brat.
And socialism of any kind is still the real target.
They tell us of drug wars and terrorism, while the real enemy is a government that is trying to better the lives of its downtrodden masses.
The problem with socialism, in the eyes of the capitalist, is that it cannot be exploited, and so it must be defeated, using one or more of the many procedures outlined in the volumes on how to manage an empire, a series originated by Great Britain, then expanded by the US.
Capitalism doesn't have to be exploitive. I'm a conservative, so I know that is true. I was taught that it was dishonest and immoral to take advantage of anyone - but that making a reasonable profit was honorable. I bought, sold, and rented on that basis - and did just fine (as did everyone else in my family).
However, predatory capitalism - more precisely fascism - is another gig althogether. Fascism is exploitive (like imperialism) in so many ways - including the use of a technologically superior military to enforce the prerequisites of both. But there is no reason a person cannot make a reasonable profit from any endeavor that does not involve the necessities of life - ie, food, water, shelter, healthcare, education - without being exploitive. Used to be that even as low as 5-7% profit was adequate for a business to not only survive, but prosper. Now shareholders want 25-30% - that's exploitive, and it beggars society rapidly.
Let's face it - fascists (long a large minority in the US) killed the Goose that lays the Golden Eggs - but some of us have been waving red flags for decades over that one. We have only one planet - and that limits 'growth' as well as profits. Cooking the goose made it look like there was more available than people thought - but alas, there are no longer those eggs....
There is a very good reason that profits cannot be made without exploitation. If labor is the source of value, as Adam Smith posits, then economics must be governed by the laws of thermodynamics, the second of which is that all transactions occur at a loss. If there are profits, then there must be participants which are not being rewarded to value and are therefore victims: workers, customers, suppliers, the public, and, primarily, the natural world.
Red herring alert. 'Economics' is not a science - it is a faith-based belief-system that serves the agenda of each particular economist. (Therefore the laws of thermodynamics do not apply.) And please - let's not be so Manichean - there is such a thing as a win-win situation where there is no apparent 'loss' in the transaction - and it's inevitable converse, the lose-lose proposition.
If labor is the source of value, one must first define 'labor' - or would you suggest that physical exertion is the only factor in defining 'labor' - ??? This would automatically discount the value of thought processes, esoteric value, etc. And then we can further define 'profits' - or do you confine that definition to mean 'money' only?
By this argument, chemistry would not exist while people continue to believe in alchemy.
Labor is done by the sun, by geological forces, and by the natural world, in addition to that of human labor. Thought processes, etc. promote the efficiency of labor, moving the value closer to a break-even point. Social benefits might not occur in monetary form, but no investor would accept benefits over profits.
armybrat:
You label yourself a conservative, but I know professed liberals whose opinions are further to the right than yours are.
I am a traditional conservative - and you are right: Americans have drifted so far Right that now traditional conservatives - like myself, my family, and my friends - have more in common these days with socialists than anyone else!!! My opinions are based on pragmatism, within the confines of morality and justice. (Justice being a common human trait across the globe and across the ages.) I assure you, none of us would ever vote for a 'Democrat' - we're 'Eisenhower conservatives' - antiwar, anti-interventionist, and anti-fascist. And I don't believe in 'democracy' - mob rule - as opposed to a republic (which makes me a republican - but not GOP or a fascist.) My first choice in the last election was Ron Paul - alas, that was not to be. I also favor many aspects of Buchanan (he has his faults, as do all politicians). I usually end up casting a 'protest vote' - many of my friends once opted for that eccentric dingbat Ross Perot.
I'm not going to re-label myself just because the birds all started flying in a different direction - I haven't changed, at least not in character or principle (but hopefully in education, understanding, and wisdom). I have more in common with other traditional conservatives than with any other group (even libertarians, whose economics escape me). And my 'conservatism' is both social and economic, as I was taught through reason and logic. I have little use for 'liberals' or the traditonal Left (for all practical purposes, nonexistent in the US and certainly ineffective, which is why US politics is so skewed). Once fascism is defeated (again, and of course, only temporarily), my true colors will once again be apparent to all - but for the time being, I will indeed 'appear' to have opinions far to the 'left' of many 'liberals' - but I will try to stay true to myself and my values, which I've found to be rather mainstream all over the country. I guess I'd classify myself (and my friends) as 'progressive' - which is why I spend a lot of time here on CD. I'm sure you've noticed that I'm quite arrogant enough to be a true conservative - a dying breed, it seems, but it is all relative to the times.
armybrat:
I appreciate your taking the time to explain your politics. You have obviously, unlike the majority, given the subject considerable thought. And it's all quite logical and humanitarian, except, I'd say, for your enchantment by the Libertarians.
I see them as a band of silver tongued rapacious fellows, Republicans in sheep's clothing, whose rhetoric pretends to favor the people, but when the chips are down would steal their granny's gold teeth right after dinner (or maybe before). Remember, Greenspan is, or was, a Libertarian (and a personal friend of Ayn Rand) and he bears a large part of the responsibility for the recent economic collapse, due to his Fed's policy of deregulation.
Libertarians want a return to the economic law of the jungle, where the strong exploit the weak with impunity, thereby violating the concept of universal justice which you so rightly admire.
It's interesting how ignorance ebbs and flows. When my mother was in high school - '40-'44 - the nuns were teaching the atom could not be split. Oops. Fortunately, I was in school during the space race, and not much was spared in science class. I went to a Catholic high school, where evolution was taught. In religion class, Genesis was a nice analogy. Although I wasn't in the advanced placement group, I did pay attention, and read lots of outside material. The math was the hardest part for me, but I understood the science. My younger cousins, and their kids, are woefully ignorant. Not just of science, but of geography, civics, and history. They express themselves with blank stares when confronted with anything outside their narrow, shallow curricula. When I try to get them interested, or offer sources of information, they can't be bothered. People in the 25-49 demographic are about the same, with exceptions, of course, but still...their minds are putty, and they are being molded by the likes of Rush, Sean, and Bill.
I came from the same Catholic high school background, and can relate to your comments about today's shallow curricula. Yes, their "minds are being molded by the likes of Rush, Sean, and Bill" and, might I add, reality TV and too much boob tube generally. I find it difficult to communicate with my siblings who never took school seriously, and so many others in my neck of the woods who really couldn't care less about history, current events (unless it's celebrity-oriented), and public policy. The level of knownothingness is astounding, and profoundly sad. I've made incremental baby-step progress with a few people, but those are rare exceptions. And then there's Glenn Beck. How low can we go?
USans now get most of their information, correct or not, from TV & the Internet.
As long as Corpstream Media puts profits way ahead of truth and investigative journalism (remember that quaint tradition?) because it must lick the hand of the Corporatist-Militarist Ruling Class which owns it, USans will never be correctly informed.
That Ruling Class has destroyed any last vestiges of even a democratic republic here. As Sheldon S. Wolin tells us in Democracy Incorprated, the U.S. is now an "inverted totalitarian" state.
I taught the baby boomers in college, and I remember their contempt for history. They called it "irrelevant." Worse, they led the movement to eliminate many of the general education requirements. When this touchy-feely generation entered the teaching corps, they seemed more interested in their students' self-esteem than in a rigorous education. Now, high stakes testing in reading and math has dealt a death blow to the teaching of history and geography, which were already nearly moribund. I can't blame everything on the boomers, but they certainly did their part.
The quest for information is much different than the quest for knowledge which is, in turn, much different than seeking wisdom. In grade school it is the book banners who beat the libraries and teachers into submission. Some good teachers fought back but many took the easier path and self-censored. In high school the emphasis on social success beats the pants off getting good grades and adequate development of the tools for further advancement.(See sports and drill and dance teams). In college settings the whole idea is economic survival for 4 years to get a degree, any degree, to land that first big payoff. Let's face it, the middle class home was much more comfortable and nurturing than dorm life: paid better, too. Most wanted what they perceived their parents had and shared with them. So, for those of us baby boomers who actually enjoyed the cornucopia of oppurtunities and didn't want to be rushed out in the real world, the academic life was laughed at by those who had no use for information that wasn't relevent to the big payoff. The boomers are an easy target; for oppurtunity and entree abounded then. Today I tell my younger friends that in the 70s you had businesses literally coming to your house, asking if you wanted to work for them, with decent pay, too. They are shocked by hard it is right now and by how much life in America has changed. The pursuit of money and easy material gain has warped what is really important and knowledge and wisdom has been shortchanged even more than our formal educational institutions of higher learning. Just sayin'.
when one's life is lived entirely dependent upon others for all physical sustenance (land, housing, water, food), due to the privatization of property, and all meaningful representation, due to our form of government, why would one's intellectual positions be any different?
ideas are presented just as products in the store, via a nonstop deluge of coordinated media...
most don't go to the store and tell the manager what to put on the shelf...most just select from what's offered...
if not your preference, well, too bad...how would you even know?
a couple of most basic topics: local edibles, and overcoming oppression...
take life back...take the land back...
Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...
Equally sad is the loss of street smarts.
It's amazing how few can connect dots to see a larger picture.
Or, how fewer still can sniff out absurdly obvious disinformation and propaganda.
How monumentally stupid do you have to be to fall blindly for the "Iran Nuclear Bomb Threat" media push after just getting played with that very same line regarding Iraq?? (66% say Iran's enrichment program is developing nuclear weapons despite zero factual evidence to support this position.)
Wouldn't a person with a functioning brain stem, at the very least, hesitate for a nanosecond before swallowing that claim whole?
How does a person displace from their thought process the linkage of thousands killed, trillions of dollars wasted and liberties lost with that very same WMD lie from just seven years ago?
A population this idiotic does not deserve a functioning democracy.
At present it apparently doesn't have a functioning democracy, or at least not one based on reason and fact and evidence and a desire to do the best for the country.
This is why a republic is just as necessary today - but keeping out the fascists is still a problem. All that 'touchy-feely' stuff gets in the way of lining them up and just shooting the bastards - and round up their families as well, since the gene pool is a dangerous production-plant for such psychopaths. The 'red-necks' are too stupid to be a threat - but the corporate gangsters are another thing altogether, as the Boston Tea Party declared. This country should never have allowed corporations to form at all.
If everyday ordinary folks could only wrap their minds around how deeply and honestly the controlling upper class hates them, and how dedicated they are to kicking us down even further, then lining them up and finding people willing to shoot them would become very easy and acceptable indeed.
Please don't call the filthy-rich robber-baron gangsters 'upper class' - they totally lack 'class' of any kind, and give a bad name to well-educated people of means. I was raised with the notion of 'noblesse oblige' - which is a worthy class standard (I'm not sure I'd really call it 'upper' though - we were simply called 'intellectuals' or 'well to do' in earlier times). Anyway, that meant never exploiting anyone, and always looking upon another's misfortune as one possible future for ourselves - fate can be fickle.
Americans have a nasty habit of denigrating 'others' - animosity and resentment of class stature is really ugly, and does no service to society - which is not the case in older societies. Plundered wealth (ill-gotten) always reflects the character of the looter - confusing 'money' with 'class' is a very bad mistake - one these plunderers hope you will make. (Revolutions are always hard on 'intellectuals' and professional military officers - my family has first-hand experience with this ugly reality.) However, I do agree that the filthy-rich (noveau riche) do hate ordinary folks, and will continue to kick them down.
What is most tragic about the decline of minds in America, is that this is happening in the midst of multiple crises: 1) global warming, 2) end of oil, 3) global financial collapse, 4) rise of drug resistant diseases, 5) nations of nuclear armed religious fundamentalists (USA, Israel, Pakistan, India, North Korea) demanding they get their way or we get nuclear war. This really is the perfect storm, and neither the captain of our ship, nor the crew, nor the passengers have the will or the ability to think or act rationally. Instead, we revert to doing what we did in the 19th century, namely, put all of our resources to war, conquest and colonialism.
Are you suggesting that one is not the direct result of the other?
The growth of protestant fundamentalist christianity in America is exemplified, for me, in the statements of my own family members to me when I earned my doctorate: "You have a PhD, and no faith in God. If the price of education is my faith, then I'll leave education alone."
What horror is greater than a deliberate return to ignorance? And how easy their manipulation becomes.
Kill your television.
Ignorant people glom onto religion because it is the lazy man's way out - no need to learn history, scientific theories, or logic. Notice too, how arrogant the bastards are - as if they were 'holier than thou' - what disgusting maggots.
Amen armybrat !
Our Father who art on Wall Street, greed is your game. Empire is your business, and hypocrisy be thy name.
Hoa binh
our crime isn't teaching less than we know, it's not acting upon what we know...
that we have sold out...
Mamma always said, "Stupid is as stupid does.".
We've been on this path for many decades - but really started on the downhill slide back in the 1980's. During Reagan's reign, education budgets were cut, curricula were changed and emphasis on public education dulled.
But, more importantly, it was also the time when the consolidation of the media was enabled by legislation and appointments to important commissions (FCC, etc.) I think there are six global corporations which now own the vast majority of the media outlets in this country. And, they are the ones who dictate what is true and what is false in the public mind. We are so-o-o-ooo screwed.
Media consolidation and Glass-Steagal (as well as NAFTA and ending personal welfare) happened on Clinton's watch.
MERICANS EVEN DUMBER NOW. ECONOMY BETTER, JOBS COMING. C
Read the late Jane Jacob's book, "Dark Age Ahead". She identifies 5 trends that accompany or cause social collapse. One of them is the trend in higher education away from actual teaching and learning to "credentialing". There's nothing wrong with preparing yourself for the rigors of work. There is something deeply wrong with mistaking that preparation for your actual purpose in education.
To become educated is to become a citizen, a participant, a contributor. To be credentialed is really more like getting a keycard to gain entry into a certain socio-economic market demographic, i.e., your berth in the shrinking middle class. Nobody in the political class talks about educating citizens anymore; they talk about preparing youth for life in the workforce, about "competitiveness", about skills and "marketability". And vast numbers of young people apparently believe all of it or go along because it's the only game in town.
The "Reagan (Counter) Revolution" is complete and the gains of the counterculture, anti-war, environmental and liberatory political movements have been eclipsed, co-opted into "lifestyle choices" or erased altogether. Anybody who thinks that shameless, glad-handing, gen x self-promoters like Arne Duncan and Barack Obama are going reverse this trend is dreaming. Take a look at "race to the Top". Who says education is a "race"? Who says there is a "top"? What is the "top". Who says making schools and teachers compete with each other on the basis of standardized test scores will result in better education for kids? Who says vouchers, charter schools, and arbitrary "performance metrics" applied by bureaucrats will improve educational outcomes for significant numbers of kids?
As far as I can see there isn't a shred of credible data supporting any of these suppositions.
Lack of data never stopped these guys however.
Read Dewey. Prepare the serfs for their place at the oars. As for 'credentials' - that is a farce. Many people have no need of institutional 'higher learning' in order to be successful at their calling. Those credentials are just another part of the system that stamps and labels people as 'objects' and values them by how much they can be exploited.
All portended by the demise of the door-to-door encyclopedia salesman.
Great observation. My parents bought a 12 volume set in 1951. I still have several to this day.
Hoa binh
Ours came with a set of 'junior classics' - read most of them before I ever started school. Yeah - we still could use those encyclopedia salesmen - but only if the information is sifted carefully for propaganda (got enough of that already).
For so many people, it's "I'll see it when I believe it">
Rupert Murdock provides the Stage and hires the Actors that inundate the air waves with gibberish. He is taking great pleasure in manipulating American Politics through the media that he owns. The Actors like Beck and Rush, merely parrot what Rupert Murdock wants the Public to hear.
Let us remember that Rupert is Australian. So why is it that a person from another country, is allowed to control the American political process without comment?? Beck and Rush are merely 2 of the trees in Murdock's Forest of misdirection. Rupert is pulling the strings. He is twisting the foundation of America, our Constitutional Rights, into warped fun house reflections of itself.
Oh yes, remember that Australia does not allow immigration of anyone who is not White...
this is not the first time you have posted incorrect 'facts'
Rupert Murdoch is an australian born american citizen.
tens of thousands of asians and africans migrate to australia every year
http://www.immi.gov.au/media/fact-sheets/60refugee.htm
http://www.immi.gov.au/media/fact-sheets/20planning.htm
"Oh yes, remember that Australia does not allow immigration of anyone who is not White..."
Uhh, are you sure your post isn't several decades out of date? If you go to Australia nowadays, you would have trouble walking anywhere without seeing someone of Asian descent.
Were sunk!
I heard Glenn Beck is a Mormon. Aren't these the guys that hate the US government? Were involved in 3 wars against the citizens of the USA. Illinois War, Missouri War, Utah War Aren't these the same people whose Dantist Manifesto calls for exterminating all people who aren't Mormons? I may be wrong but I'm pretty sure that what I reported is true. Anybody got time to check the facts. They are all about wealthy men. They have hotlines for young Mormon men who are banished because they compete with the older men for young women. Any truth to that while you are checking?
These are also the people who until the 70's held as official doctrine that black people were directly descended from Lucifer and thus inherently evil.
All poets and writers who are in love with the superlative want more than they are capable of. Nietzsche 1879
If you have not taught recently, you have no idea how strangled teachers now are - every iota of what is taught must be scrutinized so that the school district does not get sued! Most of the time it is by parents who are worried that their dear little ones might learn about what is REALLY happening in the world! All the old myths must be preserved, but nothing that might cause students to question that the US of A is the biggest, baddest, best, most important country ever, and it has been singled out by God so that everything we do is blessed.
So, where do you think the whole "our schools are terrible, failing and we need to completely change everything they do" movement came from??
Is it an accident that "No Child Left Behind" puts so much emphasis on testing and the old three R's that there is no time left for personal investigation, research and learning? Think it's an accident that the answer for all our school ills is "privatize 'em?"
How about the movement to give money to kids so they can go to private (even religious) schools? And if that fails, keep 'em home and teach 'em all the crap you hear from Rush and Glen and the preachers.
If we think we have problems with adults now who don't know history or geography, science or politics, JUST WAIT until all the little brainwashed home-and-religious schooled kids grow up!!
I have to blaim a lot of this on Organized Religions. Firstly
your asked to never analyze anything your told, just open
wide, close your eyes, and swallow it whole(choke/gag). Secondly, it engenders the Them v. Us mentality, which splits
societies, fragments nations and countries, and has been the
cause of countless wars going back to the Crusades at least!
As fran...pointed out, it's also strangled teachers who are
relentlessly badgered by fanatical parents and school boards
for daring to teach children to analyze or question anything,
or deviating so much as a millimeter from popular mythology.
If kids have any imagination or intellect it's killed quickly
and teachers with these qualities are fired even quicker.
TV, movies and Video Games finish destroying any analytical
bent or connection with reality. Death, laws of Physics etc.
are violated routinely. My kids used to say I was "wrecking
the movie" whenever I brought up the utter impossibility of
what appeared on the screen, but I persisted in "Wrecking"
quite a few, to the point of going thru calculations at times. Nine G's for 11 min (Mercury Rising)= 190080 ft/sec!
Man's delusional nature, egotism and greed have triumphed.
Let's do better if we rise from the ashes after 2012. Ban all
organized religions and find your own path back to the Void!
Corporations are not people and their Charters must commit to
socially usefull activities, goals, profits, apprenticeship
programs etc, and NO POLITICS OR LOBBYING!
Many Americans are proud of being ignorant, stupid, and uneducated (but not untrained) - even my pets are better than that! Schools used to encourage us to challenge authority - and we did, with gusto. Now they produce automatons - trained seals that perform on demand or get their flippers whacked... I think a lot of this 'pride' came from illiterate immigrants who were ashamed of their status and pretended to be 'above' being educated - as if that would mean they were 'sissified' - that macho crapola again. Which is why 'democracy' - mob rule - is so dangerous.
Apparently the beast in man is dominant and civilized man is recessive. It's more of a question of Biology than education. Humans are beasts. It therefore is inevitable that we will destroy ourselves directly through war with weapons of mass destruction or indirectly through global warming. We are not too far removed from marking trees with urine.
I am in full agreement with Mr. Winship's analysis. Unfortunately, it may be worse than the article indicates. In 2005-06 "researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds." http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/07/11/how_facts_backfire/ In fact facts frequently made misinformation stronger. This was especially true among the highly partisan.
==Back when Moyers spoke with Susan Jacoby about "the ignorance and erosion of historical memory that makes serious deceptions possible and plausible," she cited as an example that, "If we don't know what our Constitution says about the separation of powers then it certainly affects the way we decide all kinds of public issues."==
The year 1968; the place Toronto.
Me: You're kidding! Why on earth, Ma, did you vote for the election of Richard Nixon?!
She: (looking angry) BECAUSE BILLY GRAHAM HUGGED HIM.
Father: (looks humiliated)