Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Embarrassica the Mutilated
Sometime presidential candidate and full-time lunatic Steve Forbes recently wrote a column on “Obama’s Soft-Core Socialism”.
In case the title wasn’t already enough to knock you off your chair and have you rolling on the floor laughing, consider the big ol’ photo that leads in the article. Is it of Barack Obama, the subject of the piece? No, it is not. Is it a picture of Steve Forbes, the author of the essay? No, I’m afraid it isn’t. Instead, it’s yet another obligatory hagiographic rendering of Saint Ronald the Raygun, complete with jaunty smile, plastic Gumby hairdo, and obligatory American flag in the gauzy background. How very... er, relevant. Check my math, would ya, but wasn’t it thirty years ago that this guy was elected president? Before cell phones and CDs, let alone MP3s? And wasn’t Reagan the dude who tripled the national debt, shredded the Constitution, and began the process of cutting the legs out from underneath the American middle class?
As if this isn’t bizarro enough, consider Forbes’ title and thesis. He’s arguing that the guy who threw massive mountains of taxpayer money at Wall Street banks to save them from collapse because of the bad casino capitalism bets they had made is a socialist. (Actually, Forbes is not quite so sure – like many apoplectic freaks on the right, he simultaneously wants to call Obama a fascist too, and sorta does so.) He’s arguing that the guy whose health care solution involves forcing thirty to forty million private Americans to buy crappy expensive insurance from private companies who provide absolutely no value added in the delivery of a crucial product is a socialist. He’s telling us that the president who opened up massive tracts of offshore areas for private sector (read BP) oil extraction in unprecedented quantity, location and scope is a lockstep adherent of Marx and Lenin.
It’s really quite breathtaking. If we hadn’t learned already (and almost no one in the Democratic Party or the American public seems to have) just how insidiously ingenious and recklessly disingenuous these monsters on the right are when it comes to the art of political framing, it would otherwise be tempting to conclude that people like Forbes must be snorting enough cocaine every day to launch a herd of elephants into space and park them in low earth orbit. That’s how paranoid they are.
The piece is riddled with more bad lies than a local Rotary Club golf tournament – after a liquid lunch – and is packed with more stupidity than a truckload of Texas state GOP party platform photocopies coming back from Kinko’s. But the line that really caught my eye was this one: “The truth is that not even the Franklin Roosevelt Administration was as hostile to and ignorant about free enterprise as this Administration is. Almost every action Obama officials take underscores their belief in the stereotype that businesspeople are mostly amoral, corner-cutting, consumer-shafting, pollution-loving menaces.”
Clearly, Steve Forbes and I read different newspapers. I mean that both literally and figuratively. But it might be more accurate to say that we live in different countries. His is America The Beautiful. Mine is Embarrassica The Mutilated.
I’m sure there are tons of good-hearted small business men and women out there, trying to do an honest day’s work for an honest day’s wage, and serving their communities in every way they can (in fact, there happens to be someone just like that living in my house). But the big business corporate actors who meet such a description may well be as rare as a fundamentalist preacher who would actually be going to heaven, if there was such a thing. Even if they’re not polluting or scamming or downsizing the rest of us with wild abandon, at a minimum these corporate porkers all seem to be lobbying the government (or, what used to be called ‘buying Congress’) for subsidies, tax exemptions and deregulation, at the expense of the rest of us.
In Steve Forbes’ America The Beautiful, these corporations are “doing god’s work” as the astonishingly oblivious Lloyd Blankfein described his Goldman Sachs cancer – er, corporation. They’re waging battle against the government which seeks to take away all our freedoms. Well, not quite all, of course. For example, the freedom to breathe clean air, eat safe foods, drink clean water, maintain our health, keep our pensions, receive a pathetic minimum wage, work in a safe place, etc.
In my Embarrassica The Mutilated, on the other hand, corporations and the associated plutocracy of the über-wealthy in this country form an economic dictatorship of unparalleled greed, power and arrogance. Nor am I alone in this regard, and nor is this exactly a flash headline shouting out breaking news.
In fact, this is a very old story, and I’m keeping some pretty good company in retelling it. This guy called Jefferson that you might have heard of once said, “I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations which dare already to challenge our government in a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country”. I don’t remember seeing that in my sixth grade civics textbook for some odd reason, but that does not diminish the significance of the sentiment. The same might be said of that Madison dude’s observation that, “The growing wealth acquired by [corporations] never fails to be a source of abuses”.
Or there was Andrew Jackson’s take on this question (thanks to Thom Hartmann for collecting these): “The question is distinctly presented whether the people of the United States are to govern through representatives chosen by their unbiased suffrages or whether the money and power of a great corporation are to be secretly exerted to influence their judgment and control their decisions.”
Or Grover Cleveland’s: “As we view the achievements of aggregated capital, we discover the existence of trusts, combinations, and monopolies, while the citizen is struggling far in the rear or is trampled to death beneath an iron heel. Corporations, which should be the carefully restrained creatures of the law and the servants of the people, are fast becoming the people's masters.”
Or Teddy Roosevelt’s: “Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.”
I haven’t even included FDR’s impassioned eloquence on the subject, Lincoln’s complaints about banks that he feared more than the Confederate Army, or Dwight (career military man, five-star general, commander of the Normandy invasion, Supreme Commander of NATO, Republican, conservative) Eisenhower’s famous invocation against the all-consuming power of the military-industrial complex.
In fact, against the
authors of these passages, the actions and rhetoric of Barack Obama
look ridiculously tame, passive and corporately compromised by comparison.
Which means that, according to the ‘thinking’ of Steve Forbes –
notwithstanding his widespread fame as a profound philosopher and saint-like
man of unbridled compassion – Jefferson, Madison, Jackson, Lincoln,
Cleveland, Eisenhower and both Roosevelts were even bigger socialist-fascist-whatever-
And, really, does the wisdom of these former presidents or the pathetically mild scolding that occasionally emerges from the current one require such a lengthy leap of logic to comprehend? I mean, what would happen if, for example, Mr. Forbes poked his head out from behind the Wall Street Journal, or the magazine produced by the empire he valiantly pulled himself up by his bootstraps from to inherit from his father, only to read just the few reports of corporate predation still available in the rest of the (largely corporate) media? What might he observe there?
Maybe he’d read about the nice folks on Wall Street who crashed the economy of the entire globe by taking outrageous risks with other people’s money, knowing that if their bets went bad the taxpayers and the hated government would ride to their rescue, a hundred pennies on the dollar, and they’d continue to make record salaries and bonuses while nearly one out of five Americans left in the wake of their disaster can’t find a job.
Maybe Mr. Forbes would see the same articles I’ve been seeing about British Petroleum, and its completely unmatched record for greed and disregard of worker and environmental safety that led to producing a series of catastrophes, culminating (we hope) in the Gulf oil spill, the worst environmental disaster in American history.
What if he were to read “Gulf of Mexico Has Long Been Dumping Site” in the New York Times this week, which notes that “at least 324 spills involving offshore drilling have occurred in the gulf since 1964, releasing more than 550,000 barrels of oil and drilling-related substances. Four of these spills even involved earlier equipment failures and accidents on the Deepwater Horizon rig. Thousands of tons of produced water – a drilling byproduct that includes oil, grease and heavy metals – are dumped into the gulf every year.” The article also describes how “Even the coast itself – overdeveloped, strip-mined and battered by storms – is falling apart. The wildlife-rich coastal wetlands of Louisiana, sliced up and drastically engineered for oil and gas exploration, shipping and flood control, have lost an area larger than Delaware since 1930. ‘This has been the nation’s sacrifice zone, and has been for 50-plus years,’ said Aaron Viles, campaign director for the Gulf Restoration Network, a nonprofit group. ‘What we’re seeing right now with BP’s crude is just a very photogenic representation of that.’”
Perhaps Mr. Forbes would read the investigative piece revealing that “Millions of Americans are being duped by life insurance companies that have figured out a way to hold onto death benefits owed to families. MetLife and Prudential lead the way in making hundreds of millions of dollars in secret profits every year on money that belongs to relatives of those who die, an investigation by Bloomberg Markets magazine found. Among the people being tricked are parents and spouses of U.S. soldiers killed in battle in Iraq and Afghanistan.” The scam is to issue a fake checkbook to beneficiaries, rather than the payout they are owed. The insurance companies then pay the families a whopping 0.5 percent interest on the funds, keeping five to ten times that amount for themselves on all the returns harvested from investing those dollars. Such patriotism, eh? Support Our Troops! Don’t forget your yellow ribbon sticker!
Maybe Steve Forbes could take a gander Bob Herbert’s latest column, detailing how corporations are doing great right now, in part because they’re holding onto gobs of cash rather than hiring workers or paying a decent wage to the ones they’ve got. “They threw out far more workers and hours than they lost output,” said Professor [Andrew] Sum. ‘Here’s what happened: At the end of the fourth quarter in 2008, you see corporate profits begin to really take off, and they grow by the time you get to the first quarter of 2010 by $572 billion. And over that same time period, wage and salary payments go down by $122 billion.’ ... As Professor Sum writes in a new study for the labor market center, this period of economic recovery ‘has seen the most lopsided gains in corporate profits relative to real wages and salaries in our history’.”
And while he’s at it, perhaps Mr. Forbes might want to take a look at the country that’s been created by thirty years of bowing to the interests of corporations and other oligarchs, as institutionalized by the Washington whores of both parties whom they’ve purchased to do their bidding. The US median wage is the same as it was decades ago, and even fell during the Bush years. Today the richest one percent of Americans take home almost a quarter of all income in the country, just like it was in the good old days of 1928, but way up from the less than 10 percent they got in the pre-Reagan years. Meanwhile, millionaires realized a growth in their wealth of fifteen percent last year, rather a different experience than most of the rest of us, I’d say, especially the more than 15 million unemployed people, along with another ten million who either work part-time or have quit looking for work altogether, not to mention the 39 million people in this country who are chronically poor and do not have enough food to eat, or the 47 million without health insurance.
This is just for starters. We could go on and on here. There doesn’t appear to be any bottom to the well of greed. It is the Tragedy of the Commons cranked up on a killer cocktail of amphetamines, steroids and radioactive pellets. Our greed seems entirely boundless. Good luck to any geese out there who lay golden eggs, or for that matter geese of any kind. Or the ground they walk on. Or the rivers they drink from. Or the air they breathe. Is there not a way that’s been found yet to commoditize and profitize air? If they can’t sell it, some good folks will at the very least insist on getting rich polluting it.
This society has just lost its way. But looking at its history of stealing land from Native Americans and then abusing them, slavery, prison labor, oppression of women and minorities, and neocolonialism throughout the developing world, it may be that it never did know its way – or at least a decent, humane way. It just seems so much more grim today.
Today we raise our children with the sort of values that make them (and especially us) seem as though they were never raised at all. Gimme-gimme greed is an embarrassing attitude associated with toddlers. Oh, and adult Americans. Bullying exploitation is a shameful behavior generally left behind on the playgrounds of junior high. Unless, of course, you’re a corporate CEO or a leader in American government. Lying is something people are supposed to learn to stop doing when they’re kids. Unless you’re a regressive, that is.
Plutocratic plunderers just can’t seem to wreck this world, its people, and the planet which sustains us all fast enough. We are now rapidly reaching the natural limitations of such exploitation, and the planet is beginning to bite back.
If we’re lucky, people will too.




28 Comments so far
Show AllAll of the Presidents named above have, in their own way, promoted brutal capitalism and empire. As long as "progressives" are talking about Forbes and not Obama himself, who also works for neoliberal capital and empire, then we don't have to worry about "progressivism" being a positive factor in our political culture. As always, DMG (not me) is in denial about the nature of the system, in which he himself has a privileged place. As long as sites like CD present DMG's and others views as supposedly helpful, then it's clear they remain clueless.
"... then we don't have to worry about "progressivism" being a positive factor in our political culture."
And until we do so worry, we may as well be discussing the latest Hollywood scandal or wringing our hands over the fact that Tony Haywood will get $1 million/year for the rest of his life.
Too many of the people are duped into acceptance of the dim-witted conservative babble designed to suppress them.
Enough of reiterating the woes of the progressive community. This kind of discussion is unproductive. We here are all aware of the problems we face.
We will remain powerless until our thinkers turn their attention to ways of popularizing the progressive message.
It's new ideas that are needed - even wild ones - that will make the people realize that their political salvation will come only through their acceptance of the progressive philosophy.
DG,
How easy it is to sit in judgment on presidents and figures from the past, noting their racism, their lack of commitment to social justice, their attack on the environment! It's easy precisely because in 1828, 1865, 1900, 1912 there was no platform created to discuss those ideas. That is why these persons were so important--they voiced ideas that were out of the mainstream, that went against prevailing propaganda of the time. You can always find flawed understandings, racist locutions, exceptionalist cant in the speeches and writings of practically all historical figures, but remember--your privileged seat of judgment exists only because they began the questioning that resulted in a change in our political perspective. They might not have been perfect, but they did something that does not deserve scorn.
Who voiced ideas out of the mainstream? Andrew Jackson? Theodore Roosevelt? Lincoln? No they didn't.
Any time you express a view that goes against those of the wealthy, you are going against the current. I seem to recall TR ran as a progressive in 1912, opposing Morgan and his crowd, and lost. Would he have lost if he was on the 'right' side?
How would you label a Head of State who claims the Right to execute .... Anyone. ... Anyplace ....... Anytime... ????
If I remember right, Ronald Reagan practically invented Republican deficit spending.
David Stockman, of all people, writes in support of your thesis:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/opinion/01stockman.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1
Stockman was Reagan's OMB director, basically responsible for the initial foray into 'supply-side economics'. He says they backpedalled furiously when it clearly wasn't going to work as planned, but then a curious thing happened: Republicans found deficit spending to be so politically popular than they abandoned any pretense of caring about balancing the budget. Reagan had opened a rip into a new kind of GOP populism, and the GOP tore it wide open.
So ironic that Steve Forbes labels Obama the socialist for trying to repair the damage Republican policies have done to this country while claiming to be 'fiscal conservatives'. I find it a bit comforting that they can no longer even fool Alan Greenspan or David Stockman with that claim, anymore.
You always hear "Tax and Spend Liberal" repeated over and over and over. Why don't the Democrats use, "Deficit Spending Conservative", over and over until that one sticks. It would frame the debate concerning the deficit against the Republicans.
Borrow and Spend has a slightly better ring to it. If the Liberals has any sense or any principles, they'd proudly pronounce themselves the "Tax the rich and spend" Liberals. They'd invest in infrastructure, education, health care, renewable energy,etc. Of course they don't have any principles and would hardly consider seriously raising taxes on the wealthy.
All wealthy Americans are simply following George Washington's example. He singlehandedly started the French-Indian War, which spread to Europe as the Seven Years' War, then persuaded General Braddock to split the land obtained, basically the state of West Virginia, between William Byrd III and himself in contravention of British Law which would have divided the land among the troops. It was to pay for these wars that the British Crown raised taxes, which finally resulted in the War for Independence. Alarmed at the uprisings known as Shays' Rebellion, Washington, our nation's first millionaire, agreed to become our nation's first president. Overriding the fears of the framers of the Constitution who included the second amendment to provide for an armed militia to defend the republic, because all republics of ancient Europe were overthrown by their own professional military classes, one of Washington's first acts was to establish West Point and begin to train a professional military class. He appointed the nation's first presidential commission to investigate the complaints of farmers rising up against the tax on whiskey known as the Whiskey Rebellion. The commission somehow failed to notice that Washington owned the largest distillery in the US and that his tax amounted to an attack on his competitors, so Washington was the first to employ federal troops on his fellow citizens to enforce his domination of the market.
No one can become wealthy without the callous victimization of others.
thank you
Benjamin Franklin as another example...He grew rich publishing Newspapers. As Postmaster he forbid all Rival papers from using the Post. That killed off the competition right quick.
Hey its just BUSINESS..as usual.
Great personal wealth is accrued at the cost of other people's suffering. We live in a collective but rather than acknowledging our responsibilities and debts to each other, the oligarchy values people and resources strictly in the ways that they might be exploited. They owe us nothing. We owe them our lives.
If Obama is a socialist than the four horsemen of the fascist corporate Apocalypse that is now upon us are Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr,George Bush Jr, Dick Cheney,
Next time some right wing fascist rag prints a story of a right wing fascist corporate nut job calling Obama a socialist, can some one please counter with pages of information detailing all the corporate welfare grants, funds, tax breaks given world wide at the expense of US taxpayer socialistis.
And the most expensive corporate welfare program to date is the 2 trillion dollars handed to the military industrial complex, for two never ending illegal occupations.
Obama the socialist, if it makes republicans cringe,say it 1000 , say it , hes been in office over a year,and the republicans are crying like little girls. Just think , get Obama another 4 years , 2012 to 2016,
we will turn the country center left with real regulation, real fair trade, real wages , real jobs, and if were lucky, no more republican wars.You heard me.
"get Obama another 4 years , 2012 to 2016,
we will turn the country center left with real regulation, real fair trade, real wages , real jobs, and if were lucky, no more republican wars."
Uh,huh, and pigs fly ....
Would anyone out there care to name a few Republicans out there today who are advocating for anything that might Benefit this country and the people who live here? I am talking about the mainstream population of America. Tell us who they are and what 'good deeds' they are doing for anyone other than themselves and the Giants who feed them their daily bread. OH, my mistake, anything to actually benefit this country would be considered socialism and would be totally unacceptable.
"Tell us who they are and what 'good deeds' they are doing for anyone other than themselves ..."
I can't name even one, Annabelle.
That's the brilliance of their PR. They've been able to convince half the population that evil is good and good is evil. That's no mean feat. Who better deserves the Nobel Prize for Successful Lying?
It's unfortunate that those telling the truth have so little ability in getting their message to the people.
"We are now rapidly reaching the natural limitations of such exploitation"
DMG is more correct on this one than I think he even knows. This is the elephant in the room that none save a relative few of us radicals (in the developed world anyway) are willing to talk about.
Our way of life is about to change in ways we can't even begin to predict. If you really want to know what time it is, check out "Crash Course" on Youtube. Here's a link to the 45 minute version, but do yourself a favor and watch the whole thing some time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpePv0hgXHA
Exponential Growth cannot ever be sustained for long. Prepare yourself for the end of growth and the beginning of contraction. The math is undeniable. The data points easily verifiable. The natural consequences of man's destructive behaviors: priceless.
'This society has just lost its way--------,it may be that it never did know its way – or at least a decent, humane way'
Precisely.
What we see now is the reductio ad absurdum of a culture, the Western monotheist culture. It never had the absolute validity it has always assumed. Now, having run out of victims in the rest of the world (they possess the necessary and are inconveniently fighting back) it is intent on impoverishing and killing most Western people along with those 'others' who fight back. It is a monster ripping out its guts and eating them.
There is hope.
The solution to this is that people in the West must move towards the East in mind and intent and so isolate the West, which sucks their wealth. It is simple. People must now work, not to benefit self and thereby the whole as the specious mantra goes, but to benefit the whole and thereby self.
This is not the death of history, it is the death of selfishness.
Make no mistake, GW Bush was a prophet. The Republicans and the lock-step Democrats are right. It is a war. But it is a war underneath and against their war as has never been fought before, and it is going to wipe them out.
An immense shift has already taken place. Possessions, once a sign of wealth are becoming a sign of immense liability evident in its pathetic scraps everywhere: the motor car, the air conditioner, the house, the land, the aeroplane and the overseas holiday, the stocks and shares, the food, the clothes, the water the air, the sun, even the beauty.
Even the children.
Face it.
Meanwhile the response of the Westerner to this astonishing looming threat is absurdly funny. No Soap Opera could imagine the mental environment of the US citizen evident in bucket loads on every page and corner and screen and face now, and the US citizen is not alone in this nuttiness.
An entire culture has been reduced to the absurd. The war against war has already been won. These are the times of the screams, the cries of despair and rank, snide dishonour, the times of the death throes and the time of the horrific smell of a mental and physical corruption of millions upon millions is near.
You see Mr and Mrs West, your monotheist God is dead, your dedicated worship of self hidden behind the words God or Democracy or Justice or Love and other such pathos now lies exposed in all its horror. Your optimism in whatever form is a cancer.
You are your terrorist; your enemy.
Yup, that pretty much sums it up.
PS: Another very significant word for this specious God in the self worshipping West is Rights.
This is from the Tao teh Ching, written about 2500yrs ago by a certain Lao Tzu.
It is a free rendition of
Chapter 77.
Perhaps it may be said
That Heaven's Way
Draws Power like a bowstring
And brings the highest
Closest to the lowest.
Accordingly, Heaven's Way uses the successful man's upward thrust and greed
To raise those dispossessed and thrust to the bottom by him.
Only the man of Tao
Draws in this way,
Does his work to complete it,
Accomplishes without proclaiming;
Knowing that Virtue is the only reward.
---------------//------------
Note Tao means Way, not 'The Way' as it is often written in the monotheist West. It is Way as with a high mountain, seen by each from his own place near or far east or west, morning or evening, cloudy or sunny, on the slopes or from the plains, in a valley or from a tree top on a ridge. Every view is unique but each is of the same as all the rest.
The person who said you do not change society through criticism but through new systems was correct.
Except, while the system may be new as a predomainment force in our culture, it has in fact to some extent always existed.
David M. Green,
This is now one of my two favorite political articals ever written. It is accompanied only by Charles M. Young's "More Cynicism". Thanks for the article.
Yours,
Douchette Baggie
P.S. - Thanks to Thom Hartmann for the quotes
Not meaning to criticize the earlier quotes of old dead presidents who warned of the threat to democracy by banks and corporations, so far no one has mentioned Woodrow Wilson, who is reported to have signed the Act that created the Federal Reserve Bank (many argue that this in effect privatized the U.S. Treasury), around the same time the federal government invoked the income tax, circa 1913.
Wilson later lamented the creation of the Federal Reserve. Or so it is written. But there are questions: Was that Wilson or his wife writing after his stroke, for example.
And by no means the sole example of historical holes here. One might well ask who ran the last two or three years of the Reagan White House; Nancy? Thence to Dick Cheney, who later claimed that "Reagan proved that deficits don't matter."
How close to this is: "mortgages don't matter"? Or "AIG bundled instruments don't matter"? Or Henry Paulson reportedly on his knee before Nancy Pelosi, seeking approval of the TARP bailout? About three quarters of a trillion dollars (that do not exist except as fiction).
(Oh Lord how I wish I were a real writer now: a year after Paulson's genuflection, a cousin of mine, a small hedge-fund owner, did suicide when he realized he could not make it "right" for his clients. At least a third-generation dedicated investment banker, he left a wife and young children.)
Unlike BP.
It is time to radicalize the Supreme Court's "Citizen's United" 5/4 decision and to strip corporations of ALL "citizenship" whatsoever.
Did Dick Cheney REALLY obtain a LEGITIMATE Degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison? (I was there, then!) Has anyone asked the Registrar? Has anyone asked for the Library Records of Dick Cheney at the Wisconsin University System?
Can you trust their library records? Only if they kept the analogue cards requiring typwriter updating, and including those little notes written in passing by people who wanted to tell you they had visited. (FYI: many years ago, these issues were discussed at some length, by, if memory serves, The NY Review (of Books). (The alternative would be The New Yorker, while it is possible that both attempted the issue, while I would bet that VANITY FAIR did not.) (Then there was that report of tons of records had disappeared into a labyrinth. Was that VANITY FAIR?)
Recalling history is difficult. Reconstructing it is a different task entirely. The "digital revolution" is nearly killing History. Writing in long-hand may be relevant these days!
Besides buying up old European art, is Bill Gates buying up old U.S. libraries? Hard Copy?
It would make sense. What was the "real" name of the guy who wrote The Wizard of Oz?
[And who, really, was Ronald Reagan, to say nothing of Gerald Ford.))
"Now the local American agriculture specialist wants to introduce alfalfa to these waterless, rocky mountains to feed herds of cattle principally pastured in his mind.
"Yet even as I was filling my notebook with details of their delusionary schemes, the base commander told me he had already been forced to "put aside development." He had his hands full facing a Taliban onslaught he hadn't expected. Now the local American agriculture specialist wants to introduce alfalfa to these waterless, rocky mountains to feed herds of cattle principally pastured in his mind.
"Yet even as I was filling my notebook with details of their delusionary schemes, the base commander told me he had already been forced to "put aside development." He had his hands full facing a Taliban onslaught he hadn't expected.
I'm in the American Midwest. I suspect that the Corporate Food System is failing. NOT that I want it to. It just is. Failing. The entire Post WWII system is failing. The Baby Boomers had a chance to turn around the world.
Hey Steve, when I was in high school, I had pimples, too.
We have a last chance.
Use it.
-30-
Nanoo
Sorry to hear of the tragic death of your cousin. Your comments are terrific. Watch out for real about Court House Records too, as I know the older ones can somehow disappear. I suppose the only lousy excuse being they were misplaced when going from written records to computerized. Behold the written record and long hand, indeed.
Oh, my!!
David Michael Green, you are SUPERB!
Every time that I read one of your commentaries, the pedestal on which I have put you gets higher.
You are a true American patriot..... and one of my heroes.
I love it when someone as brilliant as you skewers those Right-Wingers whom I hate so much.