Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
G-20 Protest: It Wasn't a Waste of Time
During the G20 ministerial meetings in Toronto, the sensational images of burning police cruiser cars and broken shop windows dominated the newspaper headlines. This is what the world saw.
What I saw in Toronto was radically different.
On June 21, I travelled to Toronto in a van filled with activists and journalists from around the country to participate in protests at the G20 meetings. Using brightly colored rainbow paint, we displayed our concerns with the G20 agenda on the doors and bumpers of our caravan. From "Shut Down the Tar Sands" to "Sign the UN Convention on the Right to Water", our messages expressed our beliefs that issues central to our vision of a more just and sustainable world are being ignored by the leaders of the G20.
The protests in Toronto were part of a much larger effort to question the inequality of the status quo. A network of civil society groups, known as the anti-globalization or alter-globalization movement, hold values rooted in anti-corporate and anti-colonial struggle. Seeing the images of broken windows and flaming cars constantly repeated by the media was demoralizing because it was a distraction from the serious issues to which peaceful protestors were trying to draw attention. What made Toronto truly important and memorable were educational forums and lectures by well-known activists like Naomi Klein and Maude Barlow and creative and peaceful demonstrations. However, these aspects of the Toronto protests were virtually ignored by the media.
At the height of Saturday's protests, I saw 25,000 Canadians exercising their political agency in a way I have never before seen. It was truly inspiring and it brought me hope to know that so many people care about these issues and are doing something about it.
Returning to Winnipeg meant coming back to everyday reality. My dad told me that protesting at the G20 was unproductive and ineffective. I was crushed. Suddenly, riding in my parents' car, I felt powerless.
In Toronto, discussing alternatives in the caravan with other activists, and holding my sign proudly on the streets of Toronto, I felt like we were changing things. But at home I began to question whether or not we were making any difference at all. Perhaps we just had the illusion of change because we were surrounded by like-minded people. When my dad asked me "what did the protests change?" I didn't have an answer. They certainly did not change the G20 agenda.
But my question for him and his generation is: what will change things, then? If protesting is meaningless, as he suggests, what can we do to create a more just society?
Surely my parents and others are concerned about the same issues we are. But what are they doing about it? Too often they don't challenge them directly and they don't encourage their kids to do so either. My dad reminds me that some choose to work quietly at incremental change rather than taking to the streets. But has that worked?
Would it be better if people did not protest at all? What if we all stayed in our comfortable homes, transfixed to our big-screen TVs, ignoring the reality around us? Should we really just accept the status quo that makes the poor poorer and allows the environmental destruction that is ruining our planet?
Where are all the people who protested in the 1960s and 1970s who inspired many of today's activists? Have they given up on fighting for their ideals? I fear that too many people from my parents' generation have abandoned their ideals because they think eliminating poverty or weaning ourselves off our oil addiction just isn't "realistic".
Not only is protesting important, it is our fundamental right. Many of my friends were denied this right when the police unlawfully detained them in appalling conditions for protesting peacefully, more specifically, for holding hands in a semi-circle. In order to preserve our right and ensure this does not happen again, a public inquiry into police conduct and detainee conditions is absolutely essential.
I don't agree with my dad and others that say our efforts were a waste of time. Protesting the G20 gave activists from across the country the opportunity to learn and network, as well as express and raise awareness about their discontent with current systems and policies.
Protesting was undoubtedly better than doing nothing at all, and incremental changes alone are not making the impact necessary. Were past protests for civil rights, women's rights and worker's rights a waste of time? Just a hundred years ago women's right to vote did not seem realistic either. But like speaking out against the tar sands, fighting for the right to water, and calling for an end to poverty, it was necessary. Protesting made it a reality.
Brigette DePape is a summer intern at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Manitoba and is completing a degree in international development at the University of Ottawa.



26 Comments so far
Show All"Seeing the images of broken windows and flaming cars constantly repeated by the media was demoralizing because it was a distraction from the serious issues to which peaceful protestors were trying to draw attention."
That is why the mercenary "Black Block" was there, doing the work of their corporate masters to drowned out any meaningful protest.
Bullsh*t!
Read this:
The Toronto Sixteen
Supporting the Prisoners of the G20 Police State
By PETER GELDERLOOS
http://www.counterpunch.org/gelderloos07072010.html
The reality is Black Bloc,or no Black Bloc, the corporate media was not going to talk about the issues, they never do.
While I was but a child during the 60's, I have been greatly influenced by the protest movement of that era. Sadly many of that generation have given up the fight,too bad!,we could use the help.
Protest is not a waste of time.
Here are official photographs of a plane-crash site.
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/hunt_the_boeing.htm
We need to protest that Canadian and US citizens still are denied truth.
I'm not sure you could characterize it as "giving up". I suspect many of them are tired out and discouraged and possibly too financially pressed to travel any long distance to demonstrate. It takes the optimism and hope of youth to continue the struggle. I think very few people have the strength of mind and spirit necessary to keep up the fight over decades when the world appears to slip back two steps for every step forward. There are a few--Pete Seeger comes to mind as well as someone in my own family who was on her way to a peace demonstration on the day she died in her mid-eighties.
Oops, this should have been a reply to Mad Loon a few posts back.
Waste of time depends on why you went.
If your intent was to actually make an impact on all the leaders there I would say, sure it was.
I however believe that the protests are an excellent way to highlight the lack of liberties we have, despite being told otherwise, and to show how authorities abuse their powers to become tyrants and police states.
Take interested people to protests if they have never been and make them observe how the state and the police treat your rights.
My first G20 protest was an eye opening experience in terms of the false information spread by media and the tactics employed by the state that border on conspiracy.
Unshakeable peace
____________________________________________________________________________
[The strength of the humand mind lies in the ability to think of OUR future]
http://principlesofbeing.blogspot.com/
okay, young lady, you've gotten me angry. Where are the older generation? You've got to be kidding! We've been fighting the battle for forty years or more while we watch one batch on young people after another come up and walk away from anything but their own self interest or pleasure. Trying to get college students, the 20th somethings, those in their 30s or 40s, or 50s for that matter, has been a hopeless task.
Our efforts to bring folks together for any type of justice work means getting the same old tired, but true folks. Hell, most of the time it looks like a bloody AARP meeting!
When you've driven across the country a dozen times or more to exercise your beliefs come back and talk to me!
Now, go out and gather the rest of your cohorts together and take action; we'll come join you.
There were people of all ages participating in the marches, demonstrations, discussions.
John Pruyn, for example, who had his prosthetic leg confiscated.
There seems to be a lack of high-profile people willing to jeopardize their cozy positions as regime flunkies. But that leaves more space for the grass-roots people to make the movement what they want it to be.
Its never a waste of time to bust-up the Man's Joint.
They never stop bustin' up everybody elses–including the planet's. Its the only thing They understand (along with money of course.)
TRUST NO ONE OVER THIRTY. THAT AS GOOD A MISSIVE NOW AS IT WAS WHEN TODAY'S OLD FARTS WERE YOUNG AND PROGRESSIVE OR EVEN, OBAMA FORBID, REVOLUTIONARY. MOST OF THESE SOLD OUT AND GREW UP A LA GEORGE BUSH AND GLENN BECK.
WHAT IS REMARKABLE IS THAT THE STRUGGLE HAS CONTINUED BASICALLY WITHOUT THE OLD FARTS. GOOD RIDDANCE, THEY ARE THE PAST, YOUTH ARE THE FUTURE.
THE OLD FARTS HAVE GIVEN UP THE WORLD TO PRIVILEGE AND PROFIT.
WHO NEEDS THEM?
I don't know if your serious about trusting no one over thirty, but that makes no sense to me. Obviously the youth are a big part of the future, but you can barely get any eyesight from them because most are glued to their tv, iphone, social networking site, new twilight movie - all illusions taking them away from reality.
The youth are just as dumb as those 'over thirty' that have tainted the country and I'm a 'youth' so I feel no shame in saying making that statement.
Perhaps you could look up one of those OLD FARTS to teach you how to use the shift key - I'm sure that having learned keyboarding on an ancient typewriter, s/he remembers how.
Have the old farts given up? Many if not most of the most eloquent activists and commentators are old farts. Look around.
Many of the old farts you so readily disparage participated in the civil rights protests in Alabama and elsewhere, and in the anti-Vietnam demonstrations, and in gender equality activism. They were young then.
You are young now: it's your turn.
Besides just sh*tting on the rug, what are you actually DOING?
Here's the opinion of this old fart that has been protesting for many years:
No protest, no stand, no voice against the Powers That Be is wasted. Each outcry adds to the sum total of resistance great and small.
Get off the ageism shit. Not only does it perilously ignore the wisdom of those who have fought the good fight, but the Resistance needs EVERY SINGLE PERSON in the fight if we are to move forward.
One would think this was self-evident. But perhaps not.
WHY ARE THE BURNING POLICE CARS NEWS BUT THE UNARMED PEOPLE BEING GUNNED DOWN IN IRAQ ARE CLASSIFIED FOR REASONS OF NATIONAL SECURITY.
ONE IS NEWSWORTHY.
REVEALING THE AMERICAN STYLE MURDER IN IRAQ VIA WIKILEAKS IS ON THE OTHER HAND A HIGH CRIME FOR WHICH HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWER MANNING WILL GO TO PRISON FOR LIFE IF THE OBAMA REGIME HAS IT'S WAY!
Brigette DePape: "Where are all the people who protested in the 1960s and 1970s who inspired many of today's activists?"
That was forty and fifty years ago when they were possibly in their twenties and thirties so many may, in their infinite wisdom, being in their seventies and eighties, find it inconvenient to stir from their wheelchairs to bear police beatings, fifty-thousand watt jolts, and do jail time.
Thanks, Brigette. Keep the hope, the optimism bright. The task is a long and slow one and gets done in tiny increments.
This Old Fart's generation protested the draft, the war in Vietnam, racial segregation, gender disparity, etc. Clearly, even with progress made, the battle is never over.
You are the vanguard, the tip of the arrow; your courage will encourage and animate those who see you work.
Brigette,
Yes, it was fashionable to broadcast protest in the 60's and 70's , but believe me it was a tiny bunch at the barricades, relatively speaking. Welcome to the cusp. Lots of those who claim protester status from then were just riding on the coattails of the risk takers. That's the way it is. It's like the brain. Only 3 pounds to steer the remaining mass of approximately 150 pounds. I am glad you are not in denial about your role in the body politic and acted on it. Shine on with the rest of us 2%'ers.
To Brigette DePape
To Everything (Turn, Turn, Turn)
There is a season (Turn, Turn, Turn)
And a time for every purpose, under Heaven
A time to be born, a time to die
A time to plant, a time to reap
A time to kill, a time to heal
A time to laugh, a time to weep
To Everything (Turn, Turn, Turn)
There is a season (Turn, Turn, Turn)
And a time for every purpose, under Heaven
A time to build up, a time to break down
A time to dance, a time to mourn
A time to cast away stones, a time to gather stones together
To Everything (Turn, Turn, Turn)
There is a season (Turn, Turn, Turn)
And a time for every purpose, under Heaven
A time of love, a time of hate
A time of war, a time of peace
A time you may embrace, a time to refrain from embracing
To Everything (Turn, Turn, Turn)
There is a season (Turn, Turn, Turn)
And a time for every purpose, under Heaven
A time to gain, a time to lose
A time to rend, a time to sew
A time to love, a time to hate
A time for peace, I swear it's not too late
When is the time to kill? Or a time for war? Or a time to hate?
Brigette - thank you for posting this, and while there are those who have a cynical and at times dismissive response to your evident innocence, that very innocence has to be kept alive and encouraged if the imagining and effecting of another world is to be possible. Why should this planet, your country (mine too, actually), be raped and robbed as it is by these fascists masquerading as elected leaders, who construct the false, anti-democratic, anti-United nations and indeed criminal entity called the 'G8/G20'? Why should you or anyone have to put up with the brutal repression of your freedoms of speech, assembly and association in the alleged interests of protecting those who steal from your commons and repress you? This is the New Feudalism, and it must be opposed. Keeping up the protests is essential. Your father is wrong - the effect of protest is often hard to discern, especially as the MSM insists on masking the real nature and demands of the protesters in an allegedly democratic society behind exclusive and inflammatory coverage only of flaming police cars and destroyed shop-fronts, in the continuing anti-democratic propaganda effort by the state. but as others have pointed out, the incremental effort and potential gains are needed.
And 'DHJV', please cut the anti-intellectual bullshit about not trusting anyone over thirty. In this iPod/iPhone/iThis/iThat/'Whatever' era, where do you suppose wisdom and experience comes from? As was already pointed out to you, there is now a generation of young people who couldn't give a fuck about anything but their gizmos and material gain - preferably through the corporate means. I spend a fair bit of time checking, and while there is enthusiasm here and there for knowledge and activism, amongst the fear of raising your head above the rabbit-hole, there are a lot of 'kids' out there who want to remain ignorant, want to consume and fornicate, and expect others to clean up the mess.
Not by any means all, but an alarmingly high number of young people are disgustingly mind-controlled by this religion of corporatism - I just got rid of a business associate 20 years my junior because he's incapable of living in, imagining or doing business in the arts world in non-corporate terms. Even when faced with the proof of the toxicity of the corporate mind-set on the making of art, even allowing for the occasional necessity of using corporate mechanisms to advance business, this zombie plows right ahead, for everything must be subsumed to corporatism. Even a conversation becomes like trying to talk sense to these 'born-again christian' zombies. And this is partly the explanation for the seriously reduced numbers of activists and protesters compared to the 60s.
So, since you're fond of upper-case: I SUGGEST YOU GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ARSE.
As Michael Moore has said - he no longer refers to himself as an activist, since, if you consider yourself a member of a democracy, you are by definition an activist.
"As Michael Moore has said - he no longer refers to himself as an activist, since, if you consider yourself a member of a democracy, you are by definition an activist."
I like and admire Michael Moore but he frequently sticks his foot in his mouth with opinions presented as definitive statements. This is one of his worst, and belies the period of time 12-18 months ago when he was lamenting on his website that he was out there fighting battles "all by himself - where is everybody?".
This lonely feeling, however, is understandable if a major part of his income needs to be spent upon 24/7 armed, private, physical protection for all members of his family. Even the stones would cry out.
There are others of us who, like elder cachelot, are covered with battle scars from life long confrontation and clashes with The Man. I met CORE founder James Farmer the summer I was 15, the same summer I comprehended the tyranny of HUAC, the same summer I began to absorb protest music by Woodie Guthrie, Pete Seegar, and others. My family ties go to Colonial Virgina, Cumberland Gap, Talladega, Montgomery, Tuskegee, Selma, and to both houses of Congress. Better quit here.
Trylon
"protesting at the G20 was unproductive and ineffective." is an easy thing to say.
It's so easily said by those who are never there.
- Post-Constitutional America
Curious, they hold the g-20 summits in large citys, why?
It was reported in the news that security cost was about a billion dollars for securing this meeting in Toronto. Why?
There have been large scale protest of the G-20 for years.
The police always arrest thousands, and do it unconstitutionally. Why?
They could hold these meetings on any military base , and save the billion . They dont, why?
Every time there is a g-20 its the same result, people protest, and the g-20 watch the show and flex there muscle.
Protest everything,
"we are not champions of lost causes , we are champions of causes not yet won." Norman Thomas.
Here is what I don't understand: Why don't people just protest the G20 where they are at? Have all those cops in a line and have all that security ready and protesters pick a different meeting site and start protesting against G20. It's unlikely that the protesters are ever going to break past the wall of cops and actually stop the G20 unless it is a huge amount of people.
Also it would make any country look foolish to spend that much on security that never came into play.
Thank you, Brigette, and keep the faith!
History shows that when the public is sufficiently aroused, actions that once seemed impossible become inevitable.
"When the middle classes of the west are plunged into poverty, it will force an awakening, for when people have nothing, they have nothing left to lose......Even if elites think that they truly do run the world, human nature has a way of exposing the flaws in that assumption." - A. Gavin Marshall
A handful of vandals, the Black Bloc were left alone by the police to commit acts of vandalism and photo ops were spread around the world. The thousands of police officers on duty were strangely somewhere else.
My grandson aged 14 decided to take his bicycle down to see the exciting spectacle of 20,000 policemen all dressed up like Darth Vader. Along with about 900 others who were there as either gawkers like my grandson or peaceful demonstrators they were arrested without charges, manacled and packed into Paddy Wagons. Those arrested included teenage boys and girls, Native Indians, a few vagrants, professors, media specialists, ordinary concerned citizens, two German tourists and a TTC bus driver. They arrived at a vast warehouse filled with cages, each cage holding about 20 prisoners and with an open toilet without paper. A recreation of Guantanamo Bay. The average lock up averaged between 20 and 30 hours with most of that time being denied water and food. Incarcerated criminals wouldn't have to put up with this treatment so who the hell in the higher levels of the Federal Government planned this disaster? As expected they all seem to be in hiding. The police seemed as confused about it as the people being arrested.
Tommy Taylor a young documentary film maker was one of the people arrested and I have included his story in my blog. I highly recommend you take the time to read it. The story closely parallels how my grandson describes those events.
http://justtryingtosortitout.blogspot.com