Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
May Toronto's G20 Be the Last
The security operation on the streets of Toronto has provided Canadians with the greatest single talking point of the G20 gathering this weekend. Many locals are furious at the $1bn price tag for policing a summit which they never wanted to host in the first place. As John Clarke of the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty pointed out, that same money could have paid for five years of the provincial food supplement programme that has just been scrapped in the latest round of austerity cuts.
The high level of militarisation that has been witnessed over the past couple of days has also been a major talking point, as Canadians are not accustomed to seeing such weaponry being so openly paraded at civil demonstrations. One small protest against poverty and homelessness in Toronto itself was quickly surrounded by vast numbers of police in full riot gear, including mounted police. More chilling still was the visible presence of heavily armed officers touting tear gas rifles and other firearms; police have also confirmed firing plastic bullets and pepper spray capsules at demonstrators on Saturday night.
Many Canadians have become suspicious of police tactics since the http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/08/23/police-montebello.html#ixzz0s3... ">Quebec police force admitted that it had disguised three of its own officers as rock-wielding anarchists in an attempt to provoke violence at a peaceful protest in the town of Montebello two years ago. Somewhat farcically, the three were exposed as agents provocateurs when they were found to be wearing official issue police boots identical to those of the uniformed officers "arresting" them.
There are concerns that similar skulduggery may have played a part in Toronto this weekend, where the burning of three police cars quickly became the defining image of Saturday's otherwise peaceful demonstration. Questions are being asked as to why the police chose to drive the vehicles into the middle of a group of protesters and then abandon them, and why there was no attempt to put out the flames until the nation's media had been given time to record the scenes for broadcast around the world.
The fact that so much attention has been directed towards the policing is largely due to the lack of anything newsworthy coming out of the summit itself. Even David Cameron, attending for the first time as British prime minister, published his own desperate plea in the Canadian press this week for summits to be turned into something more than the hot air and photo opportunities they have been in the past. (How this relates to his stated intention to take time out to watch the second half of the England v Germany game with Angela Merkel was not made clear.)
As an invitation-only club whose membership was literally drawn up on the back of an envelope, the G20 never laid any claim to legitimacy. Now it is also in danger of losing any credibility as a forum for global economic governance. Its failure to address any of the structural problems that caused the financial and economic crises of the past three years has certainly not gone unnoticed in Toronto, let alone its complete refusal to deal with the challenge of climate change.
Unbelievably, the G20 is scheduled to hold its next summit in just a few months. If the Canadian experience has taught us anything, it is that such meetings are simply not worth the candle. There are more than enough forums already available for national leaders to discuss the key issues of our time, and almost every one of them has a greater claim to openness and inclusivity than the G20. Now is the time to end the charade of these summits once and for all.

37 Comments so far
Show AllThe global ruling elite have never offered anything but charades to the rest of us. Yes, an end to them, once and for all.
That's not exactly ALL they ever offered the human race.
Until Darwin developed the idea of natural selection, the elite believed that generations of education and culture would improve the human race. That was the basis of our current system: improving on nature through the elaboration of texts.
It seems like they may have been wrong about that. Modern Man's lack of adaptability is front page news now. We cannot adjust to our changing environment. Or at least, our elite won't let us adjust.
The latest G-20 was a billion-dollar farce where the yes-men of corporate tyrants gather and try to look like royalty while the system they maintain destroys life as we know it, and impoverishes innocent hard-working people who don't have time for photo ops in fortified cities or the money to hire lawyers to protect them.
Once again, the rich demonstrate how brilliant they are in leveraging associative social capital to steal from those who can't defend themselves.
I couldn't agree more. Spot on! Every one of those conferences represents another layer of distancing from the democratic process.
The only purpose of these conferences is to show the "Unwashed masses" who the bosses are and who the Police are out there to protect.
It is Class warfare and the Police believe they are backing "The Winners'
Right you are GW.
And notice how the G8 conference preceded the G20 so the first string bullies could get their ducks in a row for dealing with the second string G12 (the semi-washed) who will be advised about how they must behave if they are to fit in.
The "global ruling elite" indeed, and the beginning of their end is within each of us. When we finally come to see that we don't need these products, attitudes, habits, wars, etc. that industrial society dangles before us, when we finally come to find more joy in staying "in place" instead of flying, driving, racing off to "somewhere else" to find escape, when we experience the healthier, more communal aspects of growing and sharing food locally, when we find our way to a life without the scramble for "money", then we'll live in to our true wealth, what we truly yearn for ~ each other, community, simplicity.
That doesn't mean we go "back", we move forward with the cultural/scientific/spiritual knowledge we've gained, temper it with the indigenous wisdom that all things are sacred and worthy of respect, not ruling. This "revolution" is what is happening throughout Latin America and around the world, People rising up and saying to the Corporate Beast , "We know how to live together, how to feed ourselves. Get out of the way!"
Resist and Celebrate. When we finally feel, in our bodies, the violence being done to Earth by profit-driven psychopaths in finely tailored suits, we will know the Calling to sting like the honeybee defending her hive, to charge like a grizzly protecting her cubs, and to celebrate Life, All things Sacred, like Earth People have done throughout Time. Nature provides strategies for both actions.
Perfect comment, srenade.
What a wonderful comment! Thank you, I couldn't agree more with what you wrote.
Hear hear!!!
While these are self-serving, ego-filling events for these criminals, they at least serve the purpose of putting face(s) on the members that make up the Wests' worst criminals – the Heads of State. Good to be reminded ever so often who these people are.
Btw, the CBS Evening News didn't air one second of video of the protest. Weasels.
As for the protesters, thank you.
This article proves the agents provacateaur is an actual fact of the constabulary in one Canadian town, but almost surely it's something used on a widespread basis in constabulary forces in the USA, Canada, and other countries.
The power elites will go with what works to keep the mass of people off guard and confused to keep their power and privileges.
AD
This article proves the agents provacateaur is an actual fact of the constabulary in one Canadian town, but almost surely it's something used on a widespread basis in constabulary forces in the USA, Canada, and other countries.
The power elites will go with what works to keep the mass of people off guard and confused to keep their power and privileges.
AD
This article proves the agents provacateaur is an actual fact of the constabulary in one Canadian town, but almost surely it's something used on a widespread basis in constabulary forces in the USA, Canada, and other countries.
The power elites will go with what works to keep the mass of people off guard and confused to keep their power and privileges.
AD
This article proves the agents provacateaur is an actual fact of the constabulary in one Canadian town, but almost surely it's something used on a widespread basis in constabulary forces in the USA, Canada, and other countries.
The power elites will go with what works to keep the mass of people off guard and confused to keep their power and privileges.
AD
Bring America Back !!!!
**At least Mr Hilary mentions a couple issues bringing out the activists: Homelessness and Poverty !
**Was there any mention of every Miss America' dream of
'World Peace' ??
**Hilary's solution is to ban and do away with all these\
Global summits since obviously the World Cop soccer was more important to some of the Attendees. Obama got to trade bottles of beer with someone: now thats his kind of diplomacy.
"May Toronto's G20 Be the Last"
(Largely reposting from "Toronto Police Rough up Journalists"
but just as relevant here, so pls forgive)
"Questions are being asked as to why the police chose to drive the vehicles into the middle of a group of protesters and then abandon them, and why there was no attempt to put out the flames until the nation's media had been given time to record the scenes for broadcast around the world."
False flag operations (attack by forces in power on own country faked to look like enemy-attack, to then justify attack on enemy) and use of agent provocateurs (people hired by power-holders to make protests look bad by acting extreme and violent) should, based on history, be seen as the normal strategy of police-forces.
*
What's happening here, in the broader picture? - Apparently a strategy to create "violent protester clashes at state leader meetings". This will then legitimize further tightening of repressive "security" at other and later events. "Security" has become an euphemism for police-attacks on the public, ordered by amorphous groups of "leaders".
The police herds people and peaceful protesters into an unescapable location, then demand that people leave by unavailable routes. This justifies harassment and arrests, predictably leading to "clashes".
As official authorities naturally dominate the media (cf. Israel's attack and murder of peace activists May 30, 2010), what will remain in "the public mind" (i.e. mainstream media's short-hand references to the events later) is a perception that "anarchists", "violent protesters" or "unruly demonstrators" have upset important and legitimate gatherings of world leaders who are hard at work with the difficult tasks of securing the good of all. However bad the purported good is.
This false picture is then used to justify further aggressive and proactive "security" measures by official rulers wherever similar meetings take place.
This will also be the demand by the "leaders" who visit these events. Individual countries have little to say on the size and quality of "security arrangements". Countries wanting to be part of "the international community" will have to make the "security arrangements" demanded by the organizers of such summits.
The public pays for these costly attacks on ourselves and democratic rights.
This is not budding fascism. - It's escalating fascism presented as democracy. But people all around the world are waking up to the fact.
The world's becoming one, including regarding the strategies different countries implement to handle "protest" - i.e. legitimate objections to ruling policies.
We the people striving for more harmonic living have an ally in the planet herself, as the biosphere reacts to abuse and in effect shuts down the exploitation by overextended human systems. Harmony will win, eventually. But the way there isn't pretty. Nor is it made prettier by our leaders.
What's happening at the current G-20 meeting, preceeded by a premise-setting G-8 meeting, is simply put that elites design how the public shall pay for the richest's financial extravagances and crises - and the wasteful, unsustainable living of the top ten percent of the world's population. (The top ten percent equals about 700 million in the global "West" - us rich and educated enough to use the internet. That's us here, friends). With the tracks set for the rest to follow with little choice or leeway.
The disastrous track of uncontinuable "growth" in the limited quantity planet Earth is, shall go on while people die 'en masse' from it.
All growth in excess of THE NATURAL HUMAN GROWTH RATE OF 1.3 PERCENT annually, countering our natural decay, can now only exacerbate the problems the global human tribe faces.
Time to wake up to how we're abused - no matter how well we live. 25,000 die every day from our trade-systems, and one billion live in starvation - just beyond the horizon of our attention-spans.
Ingenious and forceful reaction to the voilent abuse of people by authorities is now the way to save the best of human culture. - Don't believe the hype that non-violent resistance is the way of humanist protest. History belies that passivising claim.
Do unto authorized attackers as you'd accept them doing to you if you'd become as dastardly crazy as them.
*
"Now is the time to end the charade of these summits once and for all." Indeed.
*
Documentation that today's 'Black block' destructive rioters are probable police 'agent provocateurs':
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19928
Actually, G20 is somewhat of an "improvement" over G8 - a highly pretentious group of old-timers trying desperately to retain their power and relevance. G8 used to be the G7 before Russia was "admitted" into the club. And even before, it was just the G6 before Canada got in (why Australia is not there, I really don't know). G6 was initiated by France - another pretentious imperial country, trying to stay relevant in the 21st century. The *only* country that is in this rich man's group called the G8 purely because of their citizens' hard work (and NOT due to past imperial conquests, or through an abundance of natural resources at their command - also due to imperial conquests in the past) is Japan. (Japan's imperial history is relatively for a short period of time. Though people do not consider China to be an imperial power, China has been an empire for most of its history, and is run today using similar instruments of control).
I agree - it's time to question the motives and the rationale behind G20. But we HAVE TO start with the G8 first. And while we are at it, it's time to either break up the so-called P5 (Permanent Members) of the UN Security Council, or expand it to reflect the current geo-political situation. It's a scandal to have a tiny group of countries - all imperial powers (excepting China) lording over the rest of humanity. When countries like Germany, Japan, India, South Africa and Brazil want to become permanent members, the existing members - including, and especially, China, do everything in their power to stop any reformation of the UN Security Council. And some clever games such as "P5+Germany" seem to be played as in the case of the Iran nuclear "issue". So it would seem that the existing P5 members would rather have Germany as a new member, over any of the other countries such as India or Brazil. The whole thing is a scandal, and it must stop.
So, let's get rid of the G20. But we should start with the G8 and the P5 first.
Good call.
if one were to make a citizen's arrest of an agent provacateur, would the agent provacateur have a defense? can law enforcement grant one immunity to break the law?
The black bloc people were NOT agent-provateurs. That is just utter ignorant nonsense.
My brother and his partner report a fair amount of support for the black bloc actions in their Toronto neighborhood (Parkdale). The targets are all vile corporations, and the police, for whom the G-20 exists to serve.
SaboCat:
Did you just definitively state the "Black Bloc" in Toronto over the weekend are not agent provacateurs because your Torontonian brother reports a "fair amount" of support for "the black block actions" among residents of Parkdale.
You really did, didn't you!?
Do you not realize that residents of Parkdale supporting the group's targeting of "vile corporations and police" in no way supports or provides evidence to your assertion? Do you often have trouble accurately extending logical arguments?
Talk about utter ignorant nonsense!
Have you heard that Mr. Obama will not raise discretionary spending for three years? Promise.
Does that mean he will freeze the Defense Department?
Spending must increase on projects to get people working or the USA may slip back into depression.
We shall see.
Obama, Wall Street and the morons in Congress are completely stuck in the Hoover mentality. Thanks to the self-styled "defecit hawks", spending will not increase, except for wasteful useless war spending, and the USA will go into a depression. You can count on it.
A junket for the owners of the planet
A get together for leaders who damn it.
who will do nothing to upset their status.
and will make pronouncements that amount to flatus
Their world is overrun with problems of human vermin.
Some of which they would very much like to extermine
So many hungry lives competing, so many will die
The total needs and wants are impossible to satisfy.
The global score likes to think its in control,
But all it does is mark the results on the board.
The teaming masses tumble down hill with the earth roll.
The winners take all they can for their own reward.
I've been to a number of protests in Canada including the Quebec FTAA Demo. The Black Bloc are mostly the same guys who get into post game Hockey and Football riots. Canadians are not quite as quiet and passive as we would like other people to believe, enough beer and testosterone and windows get broken and cars flipped and torched for no good reason other than fun.
The classical Gandhians in the protest community will claim that the Black Bloc undermines their credibility but will tolerate their presence because only pictures of violence will get into the media. This speaks to a much larger issue. We are all, both in Canada and the US totally addicted to a non stop diet of violence from our media, both in entertaiment and news, (more and more becoming the same thing.)
How much can we blame the participants who pander to our addiction on both sides of the line? The police like getting on TV also. If quiet protests got onto the news and the views participants have were aired then violence would not be tolerated by the demonstrators themselves. That doesn't happen. Peaceful protest is ignored. It is just not exciting enough to warrent air time and sponsors support. Maybe we should start taking some personal responsibility for the programming we are willing to pay for.
"The Black Bloc are mostly the same guys who get into post game Hockey and Football riots..."
What nonsense! Anarchists hate pro sports - especially violent, individualistic hero-worshiping ones like hockey and American football.
The smashing and burning of nonliving, inanimate glass, plastic and steel is not "violence". Attacking living things is violence. Leave it to a liberal to conflate property with living things. I can assure you that an anarchist NEVER inflicts injury on another human, and in most cases animal (they are overwhelmingly vegan).
It seems they just hate
I'm not convinced that vandalism is always the best way to protest, but I do think that if those windows had not been broken is Seattle and the delegates not physically intimidated, the entire march against the WTO would have been ignored by the news* media.
While resistance movements can learn from Gandhi's example, so can the cops. People being passively hauled away in paddy wagons no longer has the punch that it used to.
*propaganda
OK, no hockey, and a paper thin rationalization, same testosterone. Not that I really disaprove, nothing gets on the media these days without violence. Can't even do a wildlife film without some kind of animal violence in it. But the rationalizations are lame.
The idiot prime minister and his people had the brilliant idea to hold this useless summit in downtown Toronto and spent a billion dollars so these stupid twits could come for a short holiday and read a written summary given to them by bureaucrats and which means absolutely nothing.
No doubt the charade will continue unabated. Summits, councils, major conferences and all the rest are nothing but stalling actions for the Big World Actors to jerk each other off and agree to do NOTHING. Status quo sounds good to all the G20. Call out the robocops, bust some heads, look authoritative, say nothing of substance to the press since there is no press, and go about business as usual--destroying the world piece by piece. If the natives get restless, bust a few more heads. Get on your yachts with Tony Hayward and associates, light up those Havanas and play like you're saving the world while having a great time. Barack will join you very soon, maybe in Dubai on Tiger's golf course. You'll all have a good time massaging each other's ignorant egos.
Gee, which of these great leaders gets to be the pivot person in a twenty country circle jerk?
The police state established in Toronto to protect a small but elite group mirrors that in St. Paul when Homeland Security, the FBI, Secret Service, and even some military personnel providing intelligence arrived with 3,000 imported riot-clad cops who sealed off downtown to protect McCain, Palin and the other Republicans attending their 2008 convention. In Toronto, there were apparently 20,000 imported cops -- two for every demonstrator.
In St. Paul, over 800 demonstrators were arrested and jailed by the county sheriff (who was the "enforcer" designated by the feds). Of this number, fewer than 50 were actually charged with any kind of offense and something like seven or eight were (or will be) tried.
Here, too, journalists were treated like criminals. Two of Amy Goodman's producers were arrested even though they wore valid press tags, and she was arrested when she showed up to ask why the other two had been illegally detained. She is now suing the city (which had no control over security and which had been promised by the feds that everyone's civil rights would be protected) and other governmental bodies.
Is every city and/or poor country to pony up a billion bucks to provide this massive and militant "protection" every time important people get together for a meeting?
According to Naomi Klein on Democracy Now yesterday, last year's summit theatrics in Pittsburgh cost $100 million for security. She said the Toronto cops took advantage of this summit to purchase all of the latest high-tech doodads and substantially increase their pay. When word got out about the egregious $1 billion price tag, Canadians were understandably angry, so the cops had to show burning police cars (left to burn for hours, says Klein, instead of being put out right away) and anonymous masked 'demonstrators' destroying property to justify the outrageous cost. False flag, indeed.
Going back to at least the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago, the violent actions of agent provacateurs have been used by US law enforcement as an excuse to crack down. (I was at some of the events in Chicago -- it strains credulity that any of the 'peaceniks' would throw bags of feces at the cops, knowing, as they did, that they'd be giving them an opening to bash heads.)
In the run-up to the 2008 GOP Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota, many peace groups reported strange individuals joining their ranks trying to foment violence. Some were later exposed as undercover policemen.
So there you have it: The police are committing crimes to justify cracking down and busting Americans exercising their Constitutional right to assemble and protest, and to justify spending more on security for these useless events. The world turned upside down.
Of course, none of this applies to right-wing demonstrators -- there, you can carry a loaded gun and threaten anyone you wish and not be arrested, with the police knowing that several rightie nuts have killed innocent people in the past. What a sour joke.
The very purpose of the summits is not to gather & discuss, but to demonstrate that the elective tsars are inaccessible within their floating fortresses, that protest is useless in the modern state & that the idea that any right trumps SECURITY is, in the eyes of those tsars, entirely outdated.
Global corporate capitalism is collapsing, a higher global consciousness is emerging throughout the world that is challenging and delegitimizing the forces of global corporate rule. Read Paul Hawkins book "Blessed Unrest".
We need to recognize this and do our personal best in becoming part of this movement, using our individual talents and the life transforming dynamics of spirituality to bring about radical social change.This needs to become a new national conversation.
There can be no radical social change without a spiritual message. Humankind must rise to a higher level of conscuiousness in order to do this.
The above Srenade post speaks so well of this emerging higher consciousness.
Will Toronto's G20 Be the Last G20 Anywhere?
From James Howard Kunstler:
"What banks and governments have been doing for the past eighteen months is a dumbshow meant to distract the public from the fact that the world financial system has been effectively destroyed. There isn't enough money left in the known reaches of the universe to pay off the outstanding claims. In fact, not even close. Everything that proceeds from this fiasco will be in service of impoverishing most of the population and, incidentally, probably bringing down governments and, with them, convenient social usufructs such as due process of law and civil order."
http://kunstler.com/blog/2010/06/say-what.html