Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Driven by Globalization, Today’s Slave Trade Thrives at Home and Abroad
"The bosses carried weapons. They scared me. I never knew where I was. We were transported every fifteen days to different cities. I knew if I tried to escape I would not get far because everything was unfamiliar. The bosses said that if we escaped they would get their money from our families."
--Congressional testimony of Maria, trafficking survivor from Mexico
The legacy of slavery in America is inextricably bound with the history of the nation. And the State Department has finally acknowledged that, even today, people continue to be bought and sold as property.
The 2010 Trafficking in Persons report, a global review of human trafficking and civic and legal responses to it, for the first time ranks the United States among the nations that harbor modern-day slavery.
Although the report gives the United States relatively high marks for its law enforcement and civic efforts to combat trafficking, victims are scattered throughout the workforce: the captive migrant tomato picker, the prostitute bonded by a smuggling debt, the domestic servant working around the clock without pay.
The media have often focused on dramatic narratives of young girls lured into prostitution rings. But government data suggests that "more foreign victims are found in labor trafficking than sex trafficking," particularly in "above ground" sectors like hotel work and home health care. Official estimates vary widely, but the number of victims could be more than 12 million children and adults worldwide.
Although citizens have also been trafficked, immigrant workers are uniquely at risk. The top countries of origin for foreign trafficking victims, according to the State Department, are Thailand, Mexico, Philippines, Haiti, India, Guatemala and the Dominican Republic.
Today's slave trade capitalizes on vast inequalities across national borders, wrought by migration and economic globalization. Many governments have instituted anti-trafficking policies, but with uneven success. The TIP report states that 23 countries got an "upgrade" in the ranking of their anti-trafficking programs. But 19 countries were "downgraded" due to "sparse victim protections, desultory implementation, or inadequate legal structures."
Despite the country's relative wealth and sophisticated legal infrastructure, slavery trickles into the United States the same way it does everywhere else, through deep cracks in labor and immigration laws.
Victims often remain hidden because they fear the cost of attempting escape; they depend on their bosses not only for their livelihoods but also protection from immigration authorities if they are undocumented. Moreover, legal status is hardly a safeguard against exploitation, and temporary worker visas may even facilitate trafficking. Stephanie Richards, director of policy with the Los Angeles-based Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking (CAST), told In These Times:
We're actually seeing an increase in the number of cases of people coming in lawfully, on lawful visas, and then ending up in human trafficking... because people are using those visas as one of the forms of coercion for keeping people working for them against their will.
To its credit, the State Department's report stresses that anti-trafficking measures should not just emphasize cracking down on trafficking crimes, and that a comprehensive "victim-centered" approach should "focus on all victims, offering them the opportunity to access shelter, comprehensive services, and in certain cases, immigration relief."
But advocates fear that bureaucratic rules put basic humanitarian benefits out of reach for many victims. To qualify for special immigration relief for trafficking survivors known as the T-Visa, survivors essentially must cooperate with a law enforcement investigation-a process that advocates say can be humiliating and traumatic. That may be one reason why the number of T-visas granted annually is far smaller than the estimated scope of the problem. (And despite pressure to bring survivors into the criminal process, the Department of Justice's Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit pulled through only 43 human trafficking prosecutions in fiscal 2009.)
Though the government has documented major strides since the enactment of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, this year's report continues to gloss over the systemic failures that underwrite the bottomless thirst for cheap labor-or even better, free labor.
Sienna Baskin, an attorney with the advocacy initiative Sex Workers Project-which is currently campaigning for legislation to protect the rights of trafficked sex workers in New York-sees a continuum between the trafficking epidemic and immigration and law enforcement policies that criminalize victims:
A highly punitive and restrictive immigration system is a factor that leads people to take risks in migrating, sometimes ending up trafficked, although we must also look at poverty, persecution and gender inequities as factors. The growing problem of labor exploitation could be lessened by comprehensive immigration reform that provides visas and fair wages to all workers.
In California, Richards noted that CAST links its assistance programs for trafficking victims to a wider network of community groups fighting for worker justice:
We believe that there is a spectrum of labor exploitation and abuse that's just unacceptable in this country. And actually, some of the work that we do is taking steps to address the whole spectrum, with the idea in mind that we don't want people to end up in a trafficking situation.
The Florida-based Coalition of Imokalee Workers merges anti-trafficking and labor activism in their campaigns for farmworkers' rights. The group was recently honored by the White House for its Campaign for Fair Food, which has successfully pressured corporations to adjust their labor policies across the supply chain, from the tomato farms all the way up to brand-name restaurants like Taco Bell.
At the event announcing the new TIP report, Laura Germino, coordinator of the Coalition's Anti-slavery Campaign, reflected on the work left to be done. Just twenty years ago, she said:
There was no admission yet by this great nation that the unbroken threat of slavery that has so tragically woven through our history, taking on different patterns, but always weaving the horrendous deprivation of liberty - that it was a constant.
But here's the good part. There was nowhere to go but up.
Over three centuries into America's path toward emancipation, the government's recent, belated steps to combat modern slavery evoke both wary hope and historical shame. Now, at least, we may finally be reaching the right side of a long arc of tragedy.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



18 Comments so far
Show AllA sex house filled with North Korean slaves is about 5 blocks away from my house. It has been featured on TV. They confronted a john who had left his Blackberry there the previous evening and came back to pick it up.
We shall stop slavery in America when we pay off the slaves enough (with freedom for their families, perhaps, or just for themselves) so that we usually put the traffickers behind bars. Also, we must set up witness protection programs, and pass information about escaping to the slaves in their native languages. A huge loudspeaker next to my local sex house would do the job.
You have been posting this for a while, PaulK. Has anyone called the police sex crimes unit? What do the police say? Are they interested? Are they paid off? (I once reported drug dealing from a Mr. Softee truck that was always parked in front of my building. My local police asked me to provide proof. I told them I thought that was their job.)
What city is this? Has anyone told the sensationalistic TV news? Can someone from the local news install a camera and tape the customers? If I knew this was happening on my block I would do something.
Joe
Here in a factory area of southern China, prostitution is quite open, though illegal. One of the hang-out spots is in a park next to the main police station. Though I cannot speak from experience, I am told that most massage parlors offer sexual services - and there are many massage parlors. Most of the girls dress very nicely and seem content, as I have to walk by them each day.
CAPITALISM is THE "legal" and "respectable"
GLOBAL ALL-encompassing Slave Trade.
horrible as the sex slave trade is in every society -- Capitalism wouldn't bat an eyelash, in fact DOESN'T really, if sex-slave trade can be "included" among capitalism's various "legalities and respectabilities" for Profit...
right alongside Wage Slavery, debt slavery, and its Imperial Enslavements of every imaginable kind...like a BAZAAR of Slavery.
that's what capitalism is.
Michelle Chen points out something very useful here and that is the media ignoring labor exploitation even though it is probably more widespread than the exploitation in illegal sex trades. This could be because most multi-national corporations rely on slave labor in impoverished countries.
It also has a connection with puritan religious values. The fact is what most people find horrifying is not the slavery itself but the sex (in the old testament adultery is considered a crime punishable by death, whereas it is okay to own a slave.)
Notice too how consent of the child is generally only applied in cases that involve sex. No one ever questions whether children can consent to most other things. It is okay to indoctrination children into religious dogmas that teach them to hate homosexuals, but by God you ever show them porn and you'll get the full wrath of the State and child protection services on you. It's even okay, at least legally, to show your kids rated R movies that depict a bunch of violence, death and destruction.
Why is this?
A Wal-Mart got into trouble maybe two years ago when it was busted for locking illegal human beings inside the store at night, and giving them less than minimum wage. Locking people inside is certainly against the fire code, but the slavery issue is more important. Why wasn't the store confiscated as a tool used in the commission of the felony? If you keep your slaves in leg irons, does the state have to give the leg irons back to you?
I have no idea whether all of the slavers up the food chain at Wal-Mart went to prison for their felonies. Is slave ownership ok if you're rich?
Of course they are slaves, non-persons at the least, they can't vote or collect SSI as they have no legal existance, certinally slaves by defination. As lateas 10yrs ago I saw people chained to sewing machines in South Los Angles. They certinally were slaves, and the system likes it that way. Whaen I tried to call for help I spent 1/2 a day being shuttled about, and no one ever went out there I'm sure how would a bust like that not make the news.
A Slave is a non-person with no rights,, good enough?
>^^<
Worldwide there is not a clear line between wage slavery and regular slavery for the very poor. Lack of rights, secrecy and coercion due to need are present in both. Same with child labor and prostitution. The idea of free choice is often an abstraction.
Joe
Thanks for your thoughts. While attempting to discredit the idea that slavery can take a modern forms in today's economy, you don't actually (are perhaps unable to) challenge in any concrete way the term "modern-day slavery," which advocates for survivors of human trafficking use to describe their plight. This terminology is not something that was invented for this article, so you arguments that this is an insidious right-wing plot to confuse the public is somewhat moot (see the Coalition of Imokalee Workers' campaign). The term applies to forms of coerced, involuntary servitude that, as your comments seem to acknowledge, are very much the reality that these workers are facing. You can parse the semantics however you like, but not deny that reality. Please bear in mind that many of the victims and survivors themselves acknowledge that slavery, trafficking and coerced labor exist on a continuum that activists are struggling to bring to public light.
You categorically reject the use of the slavery paradigm to describe these struggles, while acknowledging your agreement with the descriptions of the horrific labor conditions. The definitional problem you vaguely identify as anti-immigrant propaganda (or creating "confusion" that could be misconstrued as anti-immigrant propaganda) is neither reasoned out nor backed with evidence, and it also runs counter to every idea put forward in the article. While your points are appreciated, they unfortunately don't allow for much room for dialogue, as long as connecting two concepts is interpreted as simply "sludging" issues. Please note that the article's intent is clearly not to muddle these definitions, but to create a more nuanced understanding of them--and to provide readers with facts that let them independently weigh the gradients of human suffering and exploitation within the global economic system. Thanks for sharing.
I think that in the U.S.A."Captive Chattel Slavery" is obsolete,made unprofitable by wage slavery,temporary workers and outsourcing.Why own workers when you can lease or rent or subcontract to suppliers using outsourced labor?At the manufacturing level the paternalist company job with a pension and job security and good benefits is a mythical relic of the good old days.With the notable exception of domestic and sex workers,large scale slavery for agricultural purposes in the U.S. may be mostly over.Some foreign drug cartels are still using forced labor to cultivate Marijuana in U.S. park lands however.
The modern "serf" does not have the protection of the Lord of the Manor,nor does he open the granary in times of famine.The landless peasant has no cottage or garden space or grazing ground for his non existent flocks,and the commons is no longer available to graze the family milk cow on..The hourly farm worker has none of the benefits of share cropping.No minimum wage,no overtime, no job security and largely we are not even covered by workman's comp.
The modern temp. rarely works long enough to qualify for unemployment or health benefits,often working as sub-contacted labor and asked to sign liability releases or carry our own insurance.
Trying to evade the modern equivalent of "Jim Crow" Laws and setting up shop for yourself with the proper licenses permits certifications,insurance and financing has gotten harder and harder. The owning class has created a captive labor force that goes home every night and has come to expect nothing extra from their bosses.Many of these workers are on food stamps ,energy assistance and in need of housing subsidies or homeless.
I have "worked the stream" doing "truck and orchard and vinyard work",and I have the utmost respect for the migrant families who handle the U.S. food supply.If U.S. farmers paid $10.00 an hour cash or even more,most U.S. residents still couldn't physically handle or want to do the work.
People get angry at me for saying this but when a farmer(plantation owner) had a huge investment in expensive chattel slaves he had a vested interest in their health and welfare.Now with imported contract workers they often "couldn't give a damn",even less so with more temporary workers he hasn't got to provide housing for.In many ways life was easier for the slave or indentured worker,if only physically due to the ability to marry and garden and have a small shack of your own to use on site.Today workers are lucky to have access to shade clean drinking water,porto poties, and shelter from crop dusters .I apologise if my comment has offended anyone's sensibility.
peace