EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Christian Fascists Are Growing Stronger
Tens of millions of Americans, lumped into a diffuse and fractious movement known as the Christian right, have begun to dismantle the intellectual and scientific rigor of the Enlightenment. They are creating a theocratic state based on “biblical law,” and shutting out all those they define as the enemy. This movement, veering closer and closer to traditional fascism, seeks to force a recalcitrant world to submit before an imperial America. It champions the eradication of social deviants, beginning with homosexuals, and moving on to immigrants, secular humanists, feminists, Jews, Muslims and those they dismiss as “nominal Christians”—meaning Christians who do not embrace their perverted and heretical interpretation of the Bible. Those who defy the mass movement are condemned as posing a threat to the health and hygiene of the country and the family. All will be purged.
The followers of deviant faiths, from Judaism to Islam, must be converted or repressed. The deviant media, the deviant public schools, the deviant entertainment industry, the deviant secular humanist government and judiciary and the deviant churches will be reformed or closed. There will be a relentless promotion of Christian “values,” already under way on Christian radio and television and in Christian schools, as information and facts are replaced with overt forms of indoctrination. The march toward this terrifying dystopia has begun. It is taking place on the streets of Arizona, on cable news channels, at tea party rallies, in the Texas public schools, among militia members and within a Republican Party that is being hijacked by this lunatic fringe.
Elizabeth Dilling, who wrote “The Red Network” and was a Nazi sympathizer, is touted as required reading by trash-talk television hosts like Glenn Beck. Thomas Jefferson, who favored separation of church and state, is ignored in Christian schools and soon will be ignored in Texas public school textbooks. The Christian right hails the “significant contributions” of the Confederacy. Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who led the anti-communist witch hunts of the 1950s, has been rehabilitated, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is defined as part of the worldwide battle against Islamic terror. Legislation like the new Jim Crow laws of Arizona is being considered by 17 other states.
The rise of this Christian fascism, a rise we ignore at our peril, is being fueled by an ineffectual and bankrupt liberal class that has proved to be unable to roll back surging unemployment, protect us from speculators on Wall Street, or save our dispossessed working class from foreclosures, bankruptcies and misery. The liberal class has proved useless in combating the largest environmental disaster in our history, ending costly and futile imperial wars or stopping the corporate plundering of the nation. And the gutlessness of the liberal class has left it, and the values it represents, reviled and hated.
The Democrats have refused to repeal the gross violations of international and domestic law codified by the Bush administration. This means that Christian fascists who achieve power will have the “legal” tools to spy on, arrest, deny habeas corpus to, and torture or assassinate American citizens—as does the Obama administration.
Those who remain in a reality-based world often dismiss these malcontents as buffoons and simpletons. They do not take seriously those, like Beck, who pander to the primitive yearnings for vengeance, new glory and moral renewal. Critics of the movement continue to employ the tools of reason, research and fact to challenge the absurdities propagated by creationists who think they will float naked into the heavens when Jesus returns to Earth. The magical thinking, the flagrant distortion in interpreting the Bible, the contradictions that abound within the movement’s belief system and the laughable pseudoscience, however, are impervious to reason. We cannot convince those in the movement to wake up. It is we who are asleep.
Those who embrace this movement see life as an epic battle against forces of evil and Satanism. The world is black and white. They need to feel, even if they are not, that they are victims surrounded by dark and sinister groups bent on their destruction. They need to believe they know the will of God and can fulfill it, especially through violence. They need to sanctify their rage, a rage that lies at the core of the ideology. They seek total cultural and political domination. They are using the space within the open society to destroy it. These movements work within the confining rules of the secular state because they have no choice. The intolerance they promote is muted in the public assurances of their slickest operators. Given enough power, and they are working hard to get it, any such cooperation will vanish. The demand for total control and for a Christian nation and the refusal to permit any dissent are on display within their inner sanctums. These pastors have established within their churches tiny, despotic fiefdoms, and they seek to replicate these little tyrannies on a larger scale.
Many of the tens of millions within the Christian right live on the edge of poverty. The Bible, interpreted for them by pastors whose connection with God means they cannot be questioned, is their handbook for daily life. The rigidity and simplicity of their belief are potent weapons in the fight against their own demons and the struggle to keep their lives on track. The reality-based world, one where Satan, miracles, destiny, angels and magic did not exist, battered them like driftwood. It took their jobs and destroyed their future. It rotted their communities. It flooded their lives with alcohol, drugs, physical violence, deprivation and despair. And then they discovered that God has a plan for them. God will save them. God intervenes in their lives to promote and protect them. The emotional distance they have traveled from the real world to the world of Christian fantasy is immense. And the rational, secular forces, those that speak in the language of fact and evidence, are hated and ultimately feared, for they seek to pull believers back into “the culture of death” that nearly destroyed them.
There are wild contradictions within this belief system. Personal independence is celebrated alongside an abject subservience to leaders who claim to speak for God. The movement says it defends the sanctity of life and advocates the death penalty, militarism, war and righteous genocide. It speaks of love and promotes fear of damnation and hate. There is a terrifying cognitive dissonance in every word they utter.
The movement is, for many, an emotional life raft. It is all that holds them together. But the ideology, while it regiments and orders lives, is merciless. Those who deviate from the ideology, including “backsliders” who leave these church organizations, are branded as heretics and subjected to little inquisitions, which are the natural outgrowth of messianic movements. If the Christian right seizes the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, these little inquisitions will become big inquisitions.
The cult of masculinity pervades the movement. Feminism and homosexuality, believers are told, have rendered the American male physically and spiritually impotent. Jesus, for the Christian right, is a muscular man of action, casting out demons, battling the Antichrist, attacking hypocrites and castigating the corrupt. This cult of masculinity, with its glorification of violence, is deeply appealing to those who feel disempowered and humiliated. It vents the rage that drove many people into the arms of the movement. It encourages them to lash back at those who, they are told, seek to destroy them. The paranoia about the outside world is stoked through bizarre conspiracy theories, many championed in books such as Pat Robertson’s “The New World Order,” a xenophobic rant that includes attacks on liberals and democratic institutions.
The obsession with violence pervades the popular novels by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins. In their apocalyptic novel, “Glorious Appearing,” based on LaHaye’s interpretation of biblical prophecies about the Second Coming, Christ returns and eviscerates the flesh of millions of nonbelievers with the sound of his voice. There are long descriptions of horror and blood, of how “the very words of the Lord had superheated their blood, causing it to burst through their veins and skin.” Eyes disintegrate. Tongues melt. Flesh dissolves. The Left Behind series, of which this novel is a part, contains the best-selling adult novels in the country.
Violence must be used to cleanse the world. These Christian fascists are called to a perpetual state of war. “Any teaching of peace prior to [Christ’s] return is heresy…” says televangelist James Robinson.
Natural disasters, terrorist attacks, instability in Israel and even the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are seen as glorious signposts. The war in Iraq is predicted, believers insist, in the ninth chapter of the Book of Revelations, where four angels “which are bound in the great river Euphrates will be released to slay the third part of men.” The march is inevitable and irreversible and requires everyone to be ready to fight, kill and perhaps die. Global war, even nuclear war, is not to be feared, but welcomed as the harbinger of the Second Coming. And leading the avenging armies is an angry, violent Messiah who dooms hundreds of millions of apostates to a horrible and gruesome death.
The Christian right, while embracing a form of primitivism, seeks the imprint of law and science to legitimate its absurd mythologies. Its members seek this imprint because, despite their protestations to the contrary, they are a distinctly modern, totalitarian movement. They seek to co-opt the pillars of the Enlightenment in order to abolish the Enlightenment. Creationism, or “intelligent design,” like eugenics for the Nazis or “Soviet” science for Stalin, must be introduced into the mainstream as a valid scientific discipline—hence the rewriting of textbooks. The Christian right defends itself in the legal and scientific jargon of modernity. Facts and opinions, once they are used “scientifically” to support the irrational, become interchangeable. Reality is no longer based on the gathering of facts and evidence. It is based on ideology. Facts are altered. Lies become true. Hannah Arendt called it “nihilistic relativism,” although a better phrase might be collective insanity.
The Christian right has, for this reason, its own creationist “scientists” who use the language of science to promote anti-science. It has fought successfully to have creationist books sold in national park bookstores at the Grand Canyon and taught in public schools in states such as Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas. Creationism shapes the worldview of hundreds of thousands of students in Christian schools and colleges. This pseudoscience claims to have proved that all animal species, or at least their progenitors, fit on Noah’s ark. It challenges research in AIDS and pregnancy prevention. It corrupts and discredits the disciplines of biology, astronomy, geology, paleontology and physics.
Once creationists can argue on the same platform as geologists, asserting that the Grand Canyon was not created 6 billion years ago but 6,000 years ago by the great flood that lifted up Noah’s ark, we have lost. The acceptance of mythology as a legitimate alternative to reality is a body blow to the rational, secular state. The destruction of rational and empirically based belief systems is fundamental to the creation of all totalitarian ideologies. Certitude, for those who could not cope with the uncertainty of life, is one of the most powerful appeals of the movement. Dispassionate intellectual inquiry, with its constant readjustments and demand for evidence, threatens certitude. For this reason incertitude must be abolished.
“What convinces masses are not facts,” Arendt wrote in “Origins of Totalitarianism,” “and not even invented facts, but only the consistency of the system which they are presumably part. Repetition, somewhat overrated in importance because of the common belief in the masses’ inferior capacity to grasp and remember, is important because it convinces them of consistency in time.”
Augustine defined the grace of love as Volo ut sis—I want you to be. There is, he wrote, an affirmation of the mystery of the other in relationships based on love, an affirmation of unexplained and unfathomable differences. Relationships based on love recognize that others have a right to be. These relationships accept the sacredness of difference. This acceptance means that no one individual or belief system captures or espouses an absolute truth. All struggle, in their own way, some outside of religious systems and some within them, to interpret mystery and transcendence.
The sacredness of the other is anathema for the Christian right, which cannot acknowledge the legitimacy of other ways of being and believing. If other belief systems, including atheism, have moral validity, the infallibility of the movement’s doctrine, which constitutes its chief appeal, is shattered. There can be no alternative ways to think or to be. All alternatives must be crushed.
Ideological, theological and political debates are useless with the Christian right. It does not respond to a dialogue. It is impervious to rational thought and discussion. The naive attempts to placate a movement bent on our destruction, to prove to it that we too have “values,” only strengthens its legitimacy and weakness our own. If we do not have a right to be, if our very existence is not legitimate in the eyes of God, there can be no dialogue. At this point it is a fight for survival.
Those gathered into the arms of this Christian fascist movement are desperately struggling to survive in an increasingly hostile environment. We failed them; we owe them more: This is their response. The financial dislocations, the struggles with domestic and sexual abuse, the battle against addictions, the poverty and the despair that many in the movement endure are tragic, painful and real. They have a right to their rage and alienation. But they are also being used and manipulated by forces that seek to dismantle what is left of our democracy and abolish the pluralism that was once the hallmark of our society.
The spark that could set this conflagration ablaze could be lying in the hands of a small Islamic terrorist cell. It could be in the hands of greedy Wall Street speculators who gamble with taxpayer money in the elaborate global system of casino capitalism. The next catastrophic attack, or the next economic meltdown, could be our Reichstag fire. It could be the excuse used by these totalitarian forces, this Christian fascism, to extinguish what remains of our open society.
Let us not stand meekly at the open gates of the city waiting passively for the barbarians. They are coming. They are slouching toward Bethlehem. Let us shake off our complacency and cynicism. Let us openly defy the liberal establishment, which will not save us, to demand and fight for economic reparations for our working class. Let us reincorporate these dispossessed into our economy. Let us give them a reality-based hope for the future. Time is running out. If we do not act, American fascists, clutching Christian crosses, waving American flags and orchestrating mass recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance, will use this rage to snuff us out.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


374 Comments so far
Show AllI'm glad you raised climate change as an example of where mis-stated data can land an entire movement in hot water. You cannot deny the fury with which climate-change denialists lunched on the recent IPCC report with its mis-stated claim of Himalayan glaciers melting within 25 years. Yes, an "honest" error that should never have made it to copy, but nevertheless, this simple error put the whole climate-change movement back 5-10 years. Together with the similarly maligned "climategate emails", the climate-change movement may never recover.
While you may think that simple "statistical errors" can be simply whisked under the carpet, there are some extremely well-funded lobbies that will take these simple mistakes to destroy the livelihood and lives of untold numbers of people and vast swaths of environment. A certain GW Bush played loose with data on WMDs, and look where that got millions of Iraqis.
The science doesn't factor, mistakes or otherwise.
Global warming has been known since the seventies.
Media controls the dialog/thought of the masses.
Sorry - But I MUST agree with WTF. FACTS are facts... and playing loosey goosey with them will garner no favor.
Hedges cannot claim credibility with his ongoing thesis' on society, politics, religion, economics etc. if he blandly throws out seriously flawed data... otherwise ALL is just a series of randomly interpreted BULLSHIT - and where do you expect that to get you???
I am replying to my own posting because so many people are trashing everything Hedges said because of the difference between 6 billion and 6 million. I should have said that he may not have gotten the numbers wrong; the error may be a typographical one. Perhaps he hit the b with his left index finger instead of the m with his right index finger.
It is at once refreshing and all too sad to see this piece. Refreshing that someone recognizes how truly dangerous America's Taliban are; sad that their regressive lunacy has such traction in the USA.
And wishing somehow it is possible to put them and like-minded Muslim zealots on a desert island, then broadcast them fighting to the death on pay-per-view is not a solution.
Unfortunately, they will have to dealt with, and soon, lest they drag the world into a new Dark Age.
This is an excellent article Chris, but your use of the word “liberal” and “enlightenment” may confuse many of your readers. The word liberal has been distorted terribly for many decades by the Republican party and most use of the word today has no relation to its original meaning. You are referring, I think to the Enlightenment Movement of educating the masses and exchanging scientific information around the world to facilitate a departure from serfdom and a movement toward freedom, which started I think in the 17th century.
Most properly educated individuals believe in evolution and survival of the fittest. Although we humans were originally the product of survival of the fittest, we are no longer. Around the world, we are breeding a new race of idiots, morons, and misfits, because as we became civilized we started to protect and save even the most unfit humans among us. For centuries we have been breeding the unfit and protecting them and that will never change until the day when we can no longer survive.
Forgive me for objecting to some of what you've said. Survival of the fittest doesn't mean 'strongest' or the 'best'. What Darwin was talking about was the idea that the species that adapted best to its environment was the 'fittest' to live there.
Humans don't 'breed' morons, nor do we 'breed' idiots. Morons and idiots are those who will not think for themselves. They're the product of poor education (if any).
There's also a fair bit of archaeological evidence that humans have always cared about the disabled. We've been doing that sort of thing long before we ever got 'civilized'...
It is not the morons and idiots who are at the disadvantage for reproduction, it is the intelligent who think for themselves. Social relations sponsored the dominance of the human species, but social conventions are undermining that prospect for the future.
Did anyone see Chris Hedges' last week's article from Truthdig posted here to cddotorg?
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/this_country_needs_a_few_good_communists_20100531/
I looked for, and didn't see it here. Another thought provoking read from Mr. Hedges.
Peace, y'all,
Jack Chase
Yes. That is one of Hedges' best. Strong recommendation!
Meh. CD has republished articles like that by Hedges before. Your excerpts, have been in many of his articles republished on CD. Doing a quick read through, it is very similar to many of his articles that have been republished on CD.
Nonetheless, isn't it interesting that Chris Hedges' essays garner so many comments? And the ones here on cddotorg are, IMHO, so much more erudite, learned, compassionate, and mindful than those on Truthdig. I reiterate: you cd fellow travelers keep me coming back to "hear" what you have to say. Thank you for the perspectives, the links to further reading, and for your interest.
Peace,
Jack
"Trust those who are seeking the Truth. Doubt those who find it." Andre Gide
I said I've seen a lot of material like this by Hedges on CD.
You don't have to take my word on it. Just do a search of his articles on CD. They all contain the same stuff. Nothing in that article is unusual for Hedges.
rfloh: I agree with you -- Chris Hedges regularly writes on these issues! However, lately, CD hasn't published some of his articles. But, anyone who wants to can find them all on www.truthdig.com -- where his articles are up, already published, each and every Monday morning by 6 AM.
Yea, I did not word my reply properly. I just meant to indicate I saw the article and loved it, not that it was on CD.
About a year ago, I attended a panel discussion, sponsored by Revolution Books, here in NYC. Chris Hedges, Jeremy Skahill, Michael Ratner and Diane Ortiz spoke at length that night on the subject of torture, et. al. Almost no one attended -- the panel discussion took place at the Ethical Society in NYC on 64th Street and Central Park West.
About Revolution Books -- from the website:
"At the heart of Revolution Books is the cutting-edge work of Bob Avakian, whose new synthesis of communism envisions a radically new society that is overcoming all of the oppression of the current world while giving great scope to intellectual work, ferment, and dissent as integral to the complete emancipation of humanity."
This very belief that Messiah will come and save the faithful from a Hell on Earth, is the very thing that will guarantee us a hell on Earth.
Kudos! Well said indeed.
I wouldn't get too upset at this point, population collapse will happen sooner than later...also...NASA/NOAA has some interesting news coming out about the coming solar maximum...
Not to mention the Jewish and Muslim fascists. As a matter of fact, the secular fascists are having a pretty good winning streak in Washington too...
Jewish and Muslims fascists? Yep. Secular fascists? No such thing dude.
Many good points as usual with Hedges, but again with the Liberal bashing. The right wing has the basic mindset that the ends justify the means. Therefore lying, stealing, killing, cheating are just justified means to an end for them. Not so with a liberal. So how do you fight fire with fire when you don't believe it's right to set fires?
This is the kind of comment that makes you jump out of your seat and vomit!
"Therefore lying, stealing, killing, cheating are just justified means to an end for them. Not so with a liberal."
PUH-LEASE
Obama's list:
-expand the war in Afghanistan, murdering countless civilians with drones
-continue the occupation of Iraq after 1 million dead, 2-3 million displaced
-continue warrantless wiretapping
-continue Gauntanamo Bay torture
-continue Bagram Air Base torture and renditions
-continue to argue against habeous corpus protections
ad infinitum.
We need a movement to deligitimize the liberal class, a movement grounded in anti-authoritarian politics that are socialist, anarchist and left-anti-authoritarian communist. It needs to be a legit 'working class' movement, not one fucking liberal, as they will sell you out and stab you in the back at the first opportunity.
The only people who consider Obama liberal are right wing nut jobs and media pundits who don't have a clue. Evidently you're the former.
Did you actually read what I wrote? How did you interpret my comments as someone that considers Obama a liberal?? I consider him a republican in liberal dress.
But more importantly, liberals are a disgrace IMO. They should be resisted at every turn to build a real working class movement.
tip o' the hat to Robert Fulghum, and learning everything you need in kindergarten...
the world contains bullies...people who are happy to get what they want by hurting others...
in kindergarten, you rely on teachers to deal with bullies...
as adults, you rely on the cops, or the courts, or Congress, or Jesus...
unfortunately, those avenues aren't effective...the first three have become corrupted participants in the bullying...the fourth is, um...
the problem we have, right now, is so simple as to be silly to have to state: we are trying to deal with killers without killing back...
the rest is bullshit...and rampant toxicity...
we have no land, no recourse and no future...we will never if we don't fight back...
Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...
The forth is a myth just like the first three, and all four are used as tools. I have always admired Thoreau, later came King, and then I learned of Gandhi. Nonviolence makes sense if one finds violence revolting. But, people are dieing. The chatter lately has been over nine murdered on the relief boat. The reality is that people are dieing by the thousands and millions because of the actions of a greedy few. The stage is set for it to turn into billions.
If Bin Laden was truly behind the demolition of the towers (more than serious doubt), then his mistake was one of target choice. Same with McViegh, same with Stark. It does no one any good to murder bystanders.
Where is a John Brown when we need him? Someone must take the fight to the source. We, all the people on Earth, are losing to the few. The content americans sit on couches as the herd is thinned like Bison dropping to long rifles. Those believers illustrated by Hedges will help with the reloading until no longer needed and then will fall prey to the same marksmen. Mutual hunger is our only hope to unite the masses.
yes, without going too far into the burning towers, the specific targets (offices\agencies\files) that were hit on that day are very interesting, indeed...
I'm running low on gumption, lately...I feel like a primed racehorse brought to the gate, but the race isn't starting, and time is dragging on...
the garden is well, but the larger daily damage goes unabated...
your John Brown comment is interesting...so much will be local, we will need many John Browns, and concurrently...
if hunger (or thirst or homelessness) is to be the driver, and I agree, at least things are proceeding accordingly, if agonizingly...
how close does the victim let the attacker get before fight-or-flight kicks in?
Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...take the land back, take your life back...
peace, brother Buck
dubet, my friend, maybe you should get off line for a spell. Daily injections of bad news can fester the spirit. I visited a friend in Wisconsin over the weekend. He is THE only person I know personally that pays attention and gets it. Day to day I'm surrounded by urbanites, Zappa's plastic people. It was great seeing the Sandhill Cranes, listening to their fluttering clucks. Found some cool rocks, enjoyed another storm. A serious dose of Nature does a body good.
Peace and goodwill, Buck
The intellectual and scientific rigor of the Enlightenment has no place in the empire's plans for the source nations of its military muscle, and much less amongst its sources of (wage-)slave labor.
On the other hand, only certain religious convictions are acceptable, excluding much New Testament apostasy of that commie Jew fellow who had the temerity to throw money changers out of the temple and preached sermons about the difficulty of camels getting through needle eyes. Poor Constantine's desparate imperial bargain is no longer adequate. And, of course, the current imperial banned and restricted items list very definitely excludes all those Muslim anti-capitalist heresies.
Mass conversion to the narrow confines of acceptable thought and religious practices will take some time and a few messy military crusades, but the new reformation is well under way. It's all about getting rid of burkhas and allowing little girls to attend the same "educational" facilities as little boys, dontcha know.
The Christian fascists are victims, as we all are, of class domination, but they mistakenly attribute their victimization to Satan. In this regard they are acting as all Christians have acted since the faith was canonized and made into imperial fiat by Constantine. (Indeed if the Revelations of John of Patmos are prophesizing any person, it would certainly refer to a Roman emperor who becomes a Christian and subverts the teaching, making Constantine the true Antichrist and all followers of that scripture worshippers in the religion of Antichrist.) First the faith, with the support of the imperial court and the Roman army, attacked the old faiths, which they called "pagan," meaning "bumpkin." When the pagans were defeated and all their temples destroyed, temples that housed granaries, schools, hospitals (such as they were), libraries, and all manner of public resources, Christians then turned against the Jews and drove them underground. With no further enemies in sight, Christians turned against each other and began the wars on heresy--wars in which the victors received the reward of writing the scriptures to their own satisfaction.
Profound ignorance of history is general among the whole public, who do not seem to know of the Gesti Pilati, for instance, the records of Pontius Pilate's term in Judea, containing no reference to the events related in the Gospels, which should therefore be taken as outright fictions. The public is also unaware of the Sinaticus, a fourth century codex containing a very different version of the Gospel of Mark. (No ancestry is given for Jesus, no childhood stories are related, and he does not return from the dead in that recounting.)
To continue...
People seem to think that ignorance is just a tabula rasa, but that is not so. When real facts are lacking, these are supplanted with myth, superstition, and the deluded, narcissistic projections of the self. This last is exactly the evil against which the Buddha inveighs, and is the source of the other two. Those who proclaim that all religions are equivalent are mistaken. All three of the great Abrahamic religions make a virtue of faith in god, amounting to nothing more than the claim of divine authority for one's own opinions, and this "virtue" is exactly the problem that Buddhism seeks to remedy. Liberal Christians are attempting to take Buddhist virtues for their own, while still embracing the imperially founded delusions of Christianism.
Ideas do indeed have consequences, and the idea of the separation of church and state would be a good one--if our nation had ever actually lived up to it. Inside the deluded hearts and minds of most Americans, however, the church is seen as the foundation of morality and all which does not conform to it are comporting with evil. That there might be a strong moral foundation outside of belief in god is rejected out of hand in polite society, even by this author in a previous article. When noted liberal Bill Moyers hosted a PBS series on religion, he defined religion as "the search for god," a definition which would exclude Buddhism. It should be understood in the light of reason, in seeing for yourself, that the nation's sins are abetted by its failings, certainly, but caused by its virtues.
And what solution does Mr. Hedges see to the problem of Christian terror? Why Christian love, of course, the same solution that Buddha dismissed as a non sequiter, for to love is to treat the beloved better than others. Love is not now and never can be the answer because to love is to be partial. Compassion is the answer, addressing the inequities that fuel the danger of Christian terror. Among those with whom I have discussed politics, the sense is that time has run out and the failure of liberals to overturn class society, for not doing as Communists would have done, leaves the right emboldened and on the march to the general doom of all for the foreseeable future.
Interesting thoughts. This is a pretty cool interview with Karen Armstrong (religious historian) and her movement to promote 'compassion' as the central artifact and command of all the worlds great religions:
http://bigthink.com/ideas/17653
Are Buddhists searching for God? Is Buddhism a "religion"?
The issue is at the root of Buddhism as opposed to all other teachings: the self is conditional and its existence cannot be verified by any means, because such means are merely conditions illuminating states of the self, but not the self at all. This idea would be no less applicable to a god than to a human being. A unique and accountable individual self, characterized by an invisible "soul" is the foundation of all other teachings, and particularly of the three Abrahamic faiths.
Buddhism IS and IS NOT a religion.
It IS in the sense of its true meaning from the Latin "religare" (or the older sanskrit word Yoga) which means to join to unite and in a philosophical sense to merge with the "absolute" reality of who you are and the things around.
It IS NOT however, in the ordinary sense, to believe to fill your head with concepts given to you by somebody else ... so NO DOGMA is allowed, questioning everything and everybody is in fact encouraged for the sake of your own awareness.
Searching for GOD? depends, if GOD=a personal entity, they're not for sure, and most would consider that concept really childish and unrealistic, if GOD=mystery, then more than actually searching for GOD you can say we are just being true to our own real "human" nature of great explorers, and the journey to your real self is in fact the greatest of all.
"And what solution does Mr. Hedges see to the problem of Christian terror? Why Christian love, of course, the same solution that Buddha dismissed as a non sequiter, for to love is to treat the beloved better than others. Love is not now and never can be the answer because to love is to be partial."
Unless the "beloved" includes all of creation. Are you perhaps not confusing agape with eros?
Is not compassion born out of love? Are they not, in many ways, interchangeable? Can you have one without the other?
What happens when the beloved, no matter how well treated, wants to know why he or she or it is no better treated than anyone else?
If the beloved is treated well, what should it matter if others are as well? Again, unless you are dealing with eros and not agape ....
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I generally like Chris Hedges provocative articles, such as this one. However he spends practically this entire article describing the Christian right and their various absurdities, and I think most of us already know these (in my case, by personal experience). But, where are the statistics showing the growth of this movement? Glenn Beck is mentioned. He's a powerful force, but he is also a Mormon. How is this accommodated by his fundamentalist flock?
I'm certain fascism is in the U.S.'s future. This is not because of the Christian Right, but because of the traditional right, which is fairly secular. It's certainly willing to use the Christian right to gain power, but its main power comes from money, specifically corporations and the rich who own them. So, I'd have loved to hear more, in this piece, about how the Christian Right was going to take over these powerful rightward entities (corporations, the wealthy), given its relative lack of money-power. Failing such an argument, I really wonder if the Christian Right can ever do this. No matter, however: the country is turning hard right because the existing secular fascists are more powerful than ever. But, we should never forget that their god is money and power.
Hedges has done much to illuminate how a dangerous confluence of extraordinarily concentrated military power, religious fundamentalism, division of wealth, and corporate takeover of democracy has led this country to the precipice of fascism. To fight this, we need to understand what forces will dominate this rightward shift. Hedges just says the Christian Right will dominate, spends the whole article describing how disgusting this aspect of the Right is, and never offers any justification for why he thinks the Christian Right will ever be any more than a populist sideshow: trotted out by the Rulers around Christmas, unleashed by them as a mob to burn down universities, etc. It does appear that the military will be taken over by the Christian Right, however, and that is chilling enough. Even so, the fascist rulers will be secular, as they usually are. This is important because in Hedges last paragraph he talks about how we need to offer the dispossessed a 'reality-based' alternate narrative about what is happening to them. This means identifying the enemy that exploits them, and I really don't think that's the Christian Right. That's the regular right, and most of its arguments are of the Ayn Rand variety. For example, its not the religious aspect of the Tea Partiers that concerns me. Instead, it's the way it insists on 'doubling down on the crazy' of the free-market, deregulated, every-man-for-himself bankrupt mythology that's brought this country to its knees. It is that expression of blind faith I find most troubling about the right, not the Christian expression. And its a powerful faith, as the evidence is literally in every direction that it is leading to global destruction.
On a humorous note:
Hedges: "Jesus, for the Christian right, is a muscular man of action". My sister is a fundy, and sent me some CD's of the Gospels being read. It is actually kinda comical listening to Jesus confronting the moneychangers in the temple. Jesus has this deep, bellowing voice, and the moneychangers have these wheedling, whining voices, like everybody's prejudicial image of such people. Too funny, and difficult to take seriously (which is sad cuz I do think the Gospels are otherwise pretty good reading).
I agree with your main point here: CH would have done well to actually show us how the christian right is more powerful, scary, or violent than before. Census or poll data might have been illuminating. He gives a bit of anecdotal evidence, but I tend to think it's always been the same with the "fire and brimstone" types.
I think you are right on about the corporate right wing being a bigger threat. The corporatocracy is actually a force that is, at this very moment, at the head of our country. It is affecting my life on a daily basis, when I pay my bills, feed my kids, etc., whereas I don't see the christians really bothering me. They can fuck right off, and I'm free to tell them exactly that.
One minor quibble with your post: As a former card-carrying mormon missionary, I would say you're off base if you think that mormonism is not a fundamentalist religion. Behind the slick PR sheen purchased by the tithing-rich church corporation is a culture that fits Hedges descriptions here quite precisely. To me, it is a classic, yet powerful cult. Apologies to any mormons, but this has been my experience.
I didn't mean to imply that mormonism wasn't fundamentalist. Just present evidence that the fundies aren't as 'United in Christ' as they would have us believe. I agree with you on corporatism. We are in a disastrous situation. We may in fact NOT fall to fascism: Why should the wealthy corporate class take, formally, what they already own? That would actually be pretty stupid of them, and they aren't stupid.
Of the two blind faiths rightwingers hold, I think their economic fundamentalism is the more damaging, by far. Hedges seems to indicate that we need to fight their other, religious, fundamentalism. In this, I absolutely disagree. Religion may be the opiate of the masses, but free-market fundamentalism is the act of thievery that makes such a drug necessary in the first place.
Great analysis by Ubrew. I love Chris, but the idea of fearing the Christian crazies more than the corporate, military, and financier crazies is, well, crazy. If we had a serious movement against the MIC and the bankers, the Christian Right would split and shrink rapidly.
Perhaps the point is that to keep progressive influence at the polls from getting stronger, the MIC is perfectly willing to recruit and fund "Christian crazies" in the effort, sort of the way the US funded the mujahaddin(sp?) in Afghanistan. The Dem part of the establishment is having a harder time keeping its base in line, so time to re-enlist the Rep troops, and the most energetic of those are the "crazies". The MIC may be playing with fire here, and wind-up with blowback, but I think they are confident they will stay in control. They still need to control the outcome of the electoral process and this may be the way they have chosen ....
However, it is never good to underestimate "the enemy" and I think the "crazies" might be said to be included in that category ..
Though the "crazies" may not consider themselves allies of the MIC, the fact is that, to the extent they keep progressives from gaining a foothold, the MIC may well consider them to be allies of it, for now - the enemy of the enemy is my friend. The point is they are dangerous and they are growing. Hedges is that voice in the wilderness crying "Beware". We ignore him at our peril ....
There are a billion Christians in the world, and a billion Muslims. There are 10 million Jews. There are still way too many people on these boards equating the three. In addition, you'd be hard pressed to find a million of that 10 who actually believe the all-knowing, all-powerful biblical God exists, and maybe 10% of that number that actually believes in literalism and prophecy, and almost none that reject modern technology.
This is not to say that there aren't a lot of fascist Jews, or that they don't play a role in world politics. It is to say that their role does not even approach a level that can be equated with the 2 billion Christians (whose top brass control most means of production) and Muslims (whose top brass control oil), and to say that unlike the Christians described by Hedges, superstition plays no role in their decision-making processes. At the very least, that holds out the hope that sustained efforts to reason with them can bear fruit. No such hope exists for prophetic cultists. Nobody has yet come up with a program for dealing with them. I don't know if it's possible.
Since we are slouching toward Bethlehem we might as well read the poem.
The Second Coming by Yeats
TURNING and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
nice. Thanks for posting. "The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere the ceremony of innocence is drowned" is an apt description of the Gulf coast right now.
dreamlot174 posted William Butler Yeat's famous poem, "The Second Coming".
"And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?"
I must admit that I have no information that would suggest that this is what he had in mind, but I have often thought that it sounds a lot like the culmination of Zionism.
It is ironic that my wife's parents both converted from Hindu to Christianity in India but that she wants to convert from Christianity to Hindu. After visiting the East, I began to see why that might not be such a bad idea after all. There are other great religions in the Far East but Hinduism sparks my interest the most. Of all religions tied to the military, not even Islam can win the contest on militarism against the Christians. Those of us who are good Christians are already marginalized anyway. I think that a beautiful morning spent meditating for an hour at the beach would be better than getting bored listening to sermons at a church that nobody follows. As my wife and I prepare to part with Christianity, I will be contemplating what the USA would have been like as a Hindu nation for a change. At least I would wager that a Hindu USA would be peaceful and not a lost soul that the current USA is today.
"At least I would wager that a Hindu USA would be peaceful and not a lost soul that the current USA is today."
You have a lot to learn about Hinduism. It is very militaristic, and its Caste System is brutal. Must reads are the Mahabharata, Ramayana, and Upanishads. The Bhagavad Gita is found within the Mahabharata. Joseph Campbell's discussions about them within his Masks Of God video lecture series is also a great source.