EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Resurrect the Estate Tax
How can a civilized nation afford to hand the heirs of the super-rich billions of dollars tax-free and not afford to keep teachers in classrooms?
Dan Duncan died at the end of March. The Houston gas pipeline mogul left behind a spouse, four children, four grandkids, and a fortune worth $9 billion.
Duncan, a prominent philanthropist who supported cancer research and the Boy Scouts, left behind another distinction. He was the first American billionaire to ever leave his heirs a tax-free fortune.
America's first-ever billionaire, John D. Rockefeller, died in 1937. His heirs faced a 70 percent estate tax on the bulk of his estate. Duncan's heirs are enjoying a zero percent estate tax. When he died, his son and three daughters became instant billionaires.
If Duncan had died last year, his heirs would have had to share their new billions with the rest of America. But for the first time since 1916, no estate tax graces the tax code. That's because it's been suspended for the duration of this year, thanks to a 2001 Bush administration maneuver and an impasse in Congress.
Heirs to billion-dollar fortunes, if they sell the assets they inherit this year, will have to report whatever windfalls they rake in as taxable capital gains. But analysts don't expect this new capital gains rule to raise nearly as much money as the estate tax would have.
How much will the absence of an estate tax this year cost the Treasury? It's impossible to say. No one knows how many other billionaires may pass to the great beyond between now and New Year's Eve. We do know that in 2008, the latest year with figures available, the federal government collected $25.7 billion in estate tax revenue.
That sum, by coincidence, would be enough to fully fund the $23 billion Rep. George Miller (D-CA) and Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) want Congress to appropriate to avert the nation's worst teacher layoff crisis since the Great Depression. Without additional federal funding, our schools may lose 300,000 teachers, causing class sizes to balloon across the country.
But getting that help seems to be a long shot. The 2009 stimulus legislation saved tens of thousands of teacher jobs. But stimulus dollars are running out, and deficit hawks in Congress say we can't afford more.
How can a civilized nation afford to hand the heirs of the super-rich billions of dollars tax-free and not afford to keep teachers in classrooms?
We can trace our current budget inanity back to when the Bush White House put on a full-court press to repeal the federal estate tax. The administration lacked the votes needed for a permanent repeal. However, it did manage to pass lower estate tax rates over the rest of the decade and a repeal in 2010. Under that legislation, the estate tax would reappear in 2011.
White House strategists never expected to see this reappearance. They counted on a future Congress to extend the repeal beyond this year. But by 2007, the GOP had become a minority in the House and Bush lost his shot at permanently scrapping the tax.
Meanwhile, estate tax supporters were confident the 2008 election results would make it possible to overturn the 2010 repeal. But in 2009, lawmakers deadlocked over many issues. The year ended without any congressional estate tax action.
Apparently no one in Congress expected a billionaire of Dan Duncan's magnitude to actually go and die without an estate tax on the books.
There's hope that Congress will bring the estate tax back for the remainder of the year, and apply it retroactively. But with so much at stake, lawyers for Duncan's heirs would likely battle that kind of action in the courts. The longer we go without the tax on the books, the higher the chances the courts will agree with them.
After his death, a close friend of Duncan's noted "he really wanted to help everybody." If Duncan's heirs want to help everybody, they'll troop over to Capitol Hill and demand the immediate reinstatement of a meaningful federal estate tax.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



8 Comments so far
Show AllThe sensible thing to do is to re-instate the estate tax with an exemption of five million dollars. That would protect family businesses from ruinous taxation while allowing the super-rich to help keep our country running. Naturally, Congress cannot seem to do sensible things any more, so we are playing games with people`s lives by using ridiculous tax laws that change every year. Bush and his cronies made a fine mess of just about everything they touched. In their greed, they wrecked their own country, but the rich can always move out and leave common people to thy to rebuild what we once had.
There is one minor omission in the article where it addresses the capital gains tax Duncan's heirs may be required to pay if they sell any of the assets they inherited.
Capital gains on inherited assets are levied only on the difference between the value of the asset at the time it was inherited and the time it is sold.
Example:
If I bought stock (or real estate, etc.) for $10,000 in 1970 and sold it for $200,000 in 2010, I pay capital gains tax on $190,000.
If in 2010 I inherit that same asset that my parents bought in 1970 for $10,000, I would pay capital gains only on the proceeds from the sale that exceed $200,000.
Opponents of the estate tax repeatedly call it double taxation when in reality it results in a fraction of the tax that the rest of us pay in capital gains.
The sensible thing to do is to re-instate the estate tax with an exemption of five million dollars. That would protect family businesses from ruinous taxation while allowing the super-rich to help keep our country running. Naturally, Congress cannot seem to do sensible things any more, so we are playing games with people`s lives by using ridiculous tax laws that change every year. Bush and his cronies made a fine mess of just about everything they touched. In their greed, they wrecked their own country, but the rich can always move out and leave common people to thy to rebuild what we once had.
While estate tax opponents love the "family farms being lost to estate taxes" myth, US Farm Bureau statistics confirm that estate taxes have never cost any family their farm.
Many family farms have, however been lost to the scams perpetrated by the same Wall Street banksters and their agribusiness cronies who are pushing for estate tax repeal.
The sensible thing to do is to re-instate the estate tax with an exemption of five million dollars. That would protect family businesses from ruinous taxation while allowing the super-rich to help keep our country running. Naturally, Congress cannot seem to do sensible things any more, so we are playing games with people`s lives by using ridiculous tax laws that change every year. Bush and his cronies made a fine mess of just about everything they touched. In their greed, they wrecked their own country, but the rich can always move out and leave common people to thy to rebuild what we once had.
Sorry, editing doesn`t seem to work well for me.
Why now, with two very expensive wars, an economic depression, and a record deficit, would anyone think about ending the estate tax? Do the richest Americans really need yet another break? Our nation is on the precipice of a grave fiscal decline, yet some politicians want to lower an estate tax that only applies to millionaires – less than one percent of all estates. The estate tax raises tens of billions of dollars in revenue every year from those Americans who benefit the most from the prosperity and opportunity this nation represents.
The wealthy provide much for our economy, but lowering or repealing the estate tax in order to shift their fair share of our national burden onto the middle class is entirely irresponsible. Nobody should be loosening their belt when our national debt is in the tens of trillions, particularly not people whose fortunes provide them lifetimes of financial comfort.
United for a Fair Economy is an organization that shares my views. They demand a strong estate tax for the benefit of all Americans. Check them out at http://www.faireconomy.org/estatetax/
While I favor bringing back the estate taxes, I think that we need to do this on state and local levels mainly because I don't trust Washington to spend wisely. On the one hand we tax the rich to even out the playing field but on the other hand the money is misused for wars and corporate giveaways in Washington. As for family farms, they have been persecuted and destroyed by Big Agri and not by reasonable taxation.