EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Help! What's the Cure for Financial Insanity?
Now that the bank lobbyists are nearly finished neutering the financial reform bill, it's time to face reality: our financial world will continue to be run by the very financiers who crashed the system two years ago. The bankers' arguments ricocheting through the halls of Congress make it seem as if our financial system is basically rational and sound -- that only a few flaws need fixing. That's lunacy. Our bright bankers may be rational as individuals, but collectively they perpetuate a fractured system gone utterly mad... and getting madder every day.
So the financial insanity will continue, with such psychotic outcomes as these:
1.Our pensions and 401ks will continue on their roller coaster ride, driven by market chaos and high-speed computer cacophony. Last week, the automatic trading programs our financial geniuses invented sent the Dow into a one-hour, 1,000-point freefall. Thank goodness it was only one hour. Two would have set off a global panic. No one is sure what happened or why. But don't worry, we're told. The glitches will be fixed and all will be well. (Just as a little technological tinkering is sure to prevent another offshore oil disaster too--not a problem!) In a saner world we would be asking the obvious: Does that high-speed trading serve the needs of our people, or is it just another high-risk strategy to enrich the largest and most connected investors?
2. Big financial institutions, now fully assured that they are indeed too big to fail, will continue to dominate both finance and politics. Anyone in their right mind knows that allowing five or six banks to control our entire financial system is a recipe for disaster and a major threat to democracy. What's the excuse for this form of madness? Well, we're told, during the Great Depression 4,000 banks failed (including lots of little ones), which proves that size doesn't matter. Please help me with this logic: Many banks failed and caused the Great Depression. A few big banks failed and caused our recent Great Recession...Therefore big banks are better? (Somebody flunked their Logic 101 class.) Here's what our experience tells us. Banks, both big and small, when left to play out in the street unsupervised, often end up at the casino tables-- gambling with our money. Big banks are an even bigger risk, because they have the power to gamble with our democracy as well.
3. We'll continue to pay top hedge fund managers 26,000 times more than we pay teachers. This goes back to a question I asked in an earlier post: Are 25 hedge fund managers worth 658,000 teachers? Apparently they are, since that's what they netted in 2009 during which they enjoyed the benefits of our $8 trillion (not billion) bailout. We rescued every hedge fund and bank, but left more than 30 million Americans scrambling for full-time work. This soaring unemployment caused tax revenues to tank, touching off fiscal crises in nearly every state. So governments dramatically cut spending and axed tens of thousands of teachers. The ultimate losers? Public school kids all over the country who were hoping for a good education. The winners? The bankers who caused the crisis. Even during the worst year since the Great Depression.--the sun was still shining on Wall Street, with a $150 billion bonus pool and a billion dollars each for the top 25 hedge fund managers. We put no windfall profits taxes on those billions, even though the money came directly from the U.S. treasury in the form of bailouts. We even allowed that income to be taxed at lower capital gains rates. That's rational?
4. Little countries that falter, like Greece, will continue to put the whole global economy at risk. We're told that the Greeks have only themselves to blame: They retire too early, drink too much retsina and often break into dance without warning....all on borrowed money. Yes, they broke the EU's debt limit rules. But they had a bit of help from Goldman Sachs, which made hundreds of millions of dollars in fees for creating complex derivatives to "help" the Greek government hide their debt. And yet Congress still refuses to regulate these scary financial items because they are "customized." Of course it was the global crash begun by our big banks that sparked the Greek fiscal crisis in the first place. In a sane world, the largest banks and the wealthiest investors in Greek debt (who caused the crash in the first place) would be forced to make reparations for the damage they caused. Instead, we have to make the Greeks stop dancing? Sicko.
5. The deficit hysteria drumbeat will build to a deafening crescendo. Forget about taxing the super-rich--we've got to cut benefits for working people instead. Respected journalists like New York Times columnist David Leonhardt warn us that we're all living beyond our means. It's time to tighten our belts or we'll end up like Greece. No more tax breaks for health and housing. We've got to retire later, with less money, and cut our medical expenses. And our wages have to become more "competitive." But who is "we"? Where are all these high-living people? The average non-supervisory production worker in America (about 75 percent of the workforce) has already seen an 18 percent drop in real wages since the mid 1970s. Meanwhile productivity increased by more than 90 percent. Yet now we've got to tighten our belts? Where did all that money from the higher productivity go, if not to us? No surprise here: into the hands of the few.
It all goes back to that most glaring symptom and cause of our psychosis: our insane maldistribution of income, which gets worse and worse every year. The richest 1 percent of Americans now earn more than the bottom 50 percent. Back in 1973, the richest 1 percent of earners collected 8 percent of the national income. By 2006, the top 1 percent got nearly 23 percent of the national income -- the highest proportion since 1929. Or look at the pay gap on the job: In 1970, the top 100 CEOs earned 45 times more than their workers, on average. In 2009 the ratio was 1,071 to 1.
Here's an example of what this maldistribution is costing us: The top 400 richest Americans have a combined wealth of more than $1.3 trillion. And that's enough money to endow every public college and university in the country so that students could attend tuition-free in perpetuity. (Hopefully some would decide to graduate before then.)
We need to return to Eisenhower era tax rates: 91 percent on those earning over $3 million in today's dollars. The money would roll in, and the deficit hawks would sound like parakeets.
The ultimate insanity of our current moment is that the richest investors and the largest bankers in the world just crashed our system, got bailed out by taxpayers, grew even larger, and now are back to earning record profits and bonuses. They caused the biggest jobs crisis since the Great Depression and drove the entire global economy into a ditch--and they could do it again any minute. And now they're telling us to tighten our belts and act more responsibly?
Here's the good news. The American people sense something is really wrong. They're angry at Wall Street and anyone in its pocket. It's taken a while, but the truth is seeping in. The angry public forced Congress to bring those squirming bankers into their hearing rooms. Unfortunately, Congress caved when it came to actually passing a strong reform bill that would bust up the biggest banks, end windfall profits and curb the gambling. Too bad the average citizen has no way to register his or her anger except to vote the "ins" out. Since both parties are largely in the pocket of the financial industry (and other industries), it's hard, if not impossible, to be optimistic about the new "ins."
Imagine if we could vote for something like a jobs and environment party, free from Wall Street's money, that was dedicated to putting ALL of our people to work building a truly sustainable economy? Now that would be really insane.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


42 Comments so far
Show AllSioux Rose
LES LEOPOLD: You laid out some great points... and still Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, and Grover Norquist aren't satisfied. There's yet more to take from the struggling to lavish upon the rich. I think Chris Hedges nailed it when he said we're all (becoming) serfs now.
The tide of history appears to be inverted... so many movements and liberties bravely won are being rolled back like Wallmart's prices. Ultimately I do believe the wave (of progress and progressive values) will surge forward. Waiting for the wave to turn is the hard part... or doing what we can to help it gather momentum.
It is amazing to consider it, but Glenn Beck is actually preaching to the Tea Partiers that we need to roll back America to a time BEFORE Teddy Roosevelt. That would plant us back in the Gilded Age, when JP Morgan could game the entire American financial sector just by himself. Roosevelt instituted anti-trust legislation, to break up the trusts, and America never looked back, until now. It's simply astonishing to me that people are now being propagandized to wish for the Gilded Age all over again, when a 'Great Gatsby' few lorded it over the rest of America. But that's what Beck wants, in the name of 'individualism', the new American religion.
And anyone who thinks differently is swiftly being identified as a nazi. The Tea Partiers use the word 'purge' quite often, as code to describe what they intend to do to progressives if they ever gain power.
I had to go searching for this quote from the book, The Great Gatsby:
"They were careless people, Tom and Daisy--they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money of their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made."
F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby
I was 'forced' to read Fitzgerald in High School. Thank goodness.
I too, like to be an optimist.
There are many overlapping local and international movements from gardens on former parking lots in Oregon to the Bolivian and Venezuelan social reorganizations.
Perhaps money accumulating up in the big consumer countries may be a good thing, as we learn to liver better with less stuff.
Glendon Wayne
The corporate media hacks like Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck divert the frustrations and anger of the American workers onto immigrants, Muslims, and environmentalists; and the disillusioned public is turning in increasing numbers to the appeals of evangelical fundamentalism, patriotic fascism, and spectacles.
Oh Well!
The real economy will not be able to sustain the Wall Street economy and it will collapse. Middle class values will collapse along with the real economy and so will neighborhoods, communities, schools and whole regions of certain states. See Michigan, Ohio and other parts of the Rust Belt. There it is already happening. Here on the West Coast real estate values continue to slide and with it the equity and savings of many. The old Concord Coalition will spout more nonsense about balanced budgets and fiscal conservatives will rise up to protect stockholder's interests. The Big Lies will continue from the MSM with more stories about cute pets, the 24 hour weather forcasts and high school sports. Rome will burn while Nero-like Neo-cons plot and fiddle away what's left of our country's fortunes. What a pleasent weekend thought, thanks a bunch for this article.
Does anyone (other than me) have suspicions about last week's sudden and still unexplained stock market plunge? Did any financial reporter look into who might have scored big because prices went way down, enabling them to get bargains, the buying of which bargains sent prices back up? Is there any way to check up on this sort of thing what with the financial industry insisting (with copious campaign cash) that it works much better with little or no regulation?
The people who work in these large financial institutions don't believe they're criminals -- I know; I once worked in middle management for one of them. They believe that, so long as they aren't actively robbing people at gunpoint, that what they do is entirely right and moral. They rarely make decisions with any awareness of the actual real-life effects their decisions are having on real people.
I distrust them utterly and, since what they do is done through computer systems and networks that there is no way of checking (would "derivatives" and "credit default swaps" even be possible without big computers?), we would have no way of knowing whether some company had its hackers tweak the market into precipitously declining so those in the know could do the opposite of a "pump and dump" -- send it spiraling down then buying cheap and having that very buying cause values to rise.
Unless somehow regulators can monitor the financial services industries without their being able to bribe the foxes watching the henhouses, more of this kind of thing is sure to happen again, until the whole global house of cards collapses (who'd have thought that the economy of country of Greece could almost -- and still may -- make everything crash and burn?).
Pam Martens wrote on this event for counterpunch.org and she plans to write more -- she left the article with, "to be continued..."
http://www.counterpunch.org/martens05122010.html
If you haven't yet scanned down through the financial articles on counterpunch, your time will be well spent -- if you are interested, that is!
What surprises me about the upwards migration of wealth in this country is how it flies in the face of history. Immigrants came to this country to escape the class-based societies in Europe--at least my ancestors did. Here there was hope that an ordinary person could make a good life for him/herself. And now we are establishing a new class of the super-rich without even raising a whimper of protest. Look at the baseball diamonds: Used to be, rich and poor would be in the stands together rooting for the team. Now there are boxes for the elite, air-conditioned with fifty inch TV's, martinis, catered food and who knows what else. Emblematic of what is happening here. Clunkers for most of us, Mercedes Benz for them. We rent apartments and they build multiple oversize homes. Travel for them first-class, and a fifty mile trip over crappy roads for us. Amazing--how we allowed it to happen!
I think part of the problem is they sought freedom and independence, and got it thanks to America's open frontier. But that frontier closed 50 years ago, and in each succeeding year the old constraints of economic slavery have tightened, until now we are all horribly impacted. There is no easy 'new frontier', we are left to gain space for our boxed-in lives the way Europe and Asia have been forced to for much longer than we: by pushing back on the top 1%ers. Unfortunately, that flies into the face of the logic of 'independence' that served Americans so well for so many years, back when they really were carving new realities whole cloth out of wilderness.
Under one early act (pre-emption?), homesteaders could just "improve" land by cutting down some trees and then could file for ownership. With a whole continent to plunder, it is no wonder some ordinary folks made a fair living. As the population increased and the land got bought-up, that avenue closed down quickly. I agree with you that Americans didn't have to fight the wealthy in the early years--there was so much wealth here the crumbs filtered down. Now the tea-baggers imagine it is as it used to be--just let (me) loose and don't tax me and I'll be a great success. Might take a while for that fantasy to die.
Hi drosera
Even under the Homestead Act most of the land that was supposed to go to individual settlers went to corporations, especially the railroads, who received vastly more than they needed to build tracks. Striking workers in those days were often killed, sometimes by private armies organized by the Pinkerton Detective Agency, sometimes by the National Guard. Farmers were squeezed by the railroads who charged them exorbitant fees to take their crops to market. And when the market declined in one of the frequent 19th century depressions, farmers lost their mortgages to the banks.
There has been no Golden Age in America, but the belief in one is a hook by which they lead us by the nose.
I think you've got it right. Individual independence made sense in an underpopulated wilderness, as the freedom to engage in independent decision-making produced more value than an interconnected dependent system probably would have, and it was real. But once the US became more densely populated and economically interconnected, independence became an illusion. However, in the mid- to late-20th Century the elites saw that if they convinced the common people that individual independence still was the American ideal and even the defining characteristic of the country, the common people would be far more reluctant to join together to form organizations, including unions, and more reluctant to vote in a left-leaning government, to protect themselves from the predations of powerful elites.
If you really want financial sanity, then you have to get rid of every scrap of Reaganomics. It was stupid, nonsensical and nationally suicidal when the Alzheimer's president first put us on it, and there was NO other possible outcome. Now, everything the gov't USED to do at 3% overhead costs us at least 30% for rich people's profit margins. We lock up more people than any other country in the world, we spend more on the military than the entire rest of the world combined, and we haven't improved the world in a generation, now.
Conservative is just a word used to justify the rich looting the coffers of the rest of the world. It's time that it get recognized for what it really is, a selfish, greedy, self centered waste of humanity. It benefits only those who already have too much, and makes the rest of everyone else pay for it's excesses.
Look back over the last 30 years, and tell me just what we REALLY have to show for 3 decades of conservative ideology. I don't see a thing. We've lost our leads in so many ways, and we are FAR from a moral country anymore. We have lost so much of what made this a great country, and it was all ON PURPOSE. Thank you, conservatives. How about if you tell us all just WHAT you conserved? I only see the destruction of a once great country as your legacy.
And that legacy is a 'gift that keeps on giving'. Half the country is being schooled that a bankrupt government is the fault of government spending, rather than of a conscious plan by conservatives to bankrupt the government by simultaneously defunding it through tax cuts and funding the difference through lending by wealthy conservatives (and other countries): debt enslavement.
As mentioned in this article, we need to go back to Eisenhower tax rates until the debt is paid off. And impound the wealth of the rich who try to send their money beyond borders in this new global economy. The alternative to this for treating the Reagan debt is to slash entitlement spending on the rest of us, and I'm not for that. But Glenn Beck is, and the Tea Partiers are heading in that direction. You watch: they'll define a way in which THEIR entitlement spending is sacrosanct (by Age-testing, or location-testing), but OUR'S is forfeit. 'Keep your government hands of MY Medicare' has a different meaning, seen this way.
In order to understand the real situation we need to make a clear distinction between the capitalist elite and capitalism itself. Capitalism is an economic system driven by growth; the capitalist elite are the folks who have managed to gain control of the Western world while capitalism has operated over the past two centuries. The capitalist system is now well past its sell-by date. The banking elite are very much aware of that fact and they are adapting.
Capitalism is a vehicle that helped bring the bankers to absolute power, but they have no more loyalty to outdated capitalist economic theories than they have to nations, or to anything or anyone else. They think on a global scale, with nations and populations as pawns. They define what money is and they issue it, just like the banker in a game of Monopoly. They can also make up a new game with a new kind of money. They have long outgrown any need to rely on any particular economic system in order to maintain their power. Capitalism was handy in an era of rapid growth, but that is no longer sustainable.
Since at least 1970, capital has not so much sought growth through increased production, but rather by extracting greater returns from relatively flat production levels. Hence globalization, which moved production to low-waged areas, providing greater profit margins. Hence privatization, which transfers revenue streams to investors that formerly went to national treasuries. Hence derivative and currency markets, which create the electronic illusion of economic growth, without actually producing anything in the real world.
For an era of non-growth, a different game is being prepared. It may be called capitalism "for old time's sake", but any resemblance to the capitalist underpinnings of a bygone industrial era will be purely coincidental. What you are witnessing is the early transitional stage of a profound transformation and a whole new social order.
If you've hated the capitalist elite's manipulations of national and international economies, your probably won't like its rapidly evolving micromanagement of the global societal environment much either. Expressing your sentiments out loud, however, is likely to be increasingly unwise.
__
Largely plagarized from Richard K. Moore's "Prognosis 2012":
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17826
Thanks for the Heads-up to Moore's essay; it ties together several threads of thought I've had about events, recent and further ago. Unlike Hudson's recent essays, this one is good, but only up to a point as he's a climate-change-denialist. He even appears to deny Peak Oil despite his essay relying on resource depletion as one of its premises. He even gets the year of the Seattle WTO protest wrong. Then there is the glaring lack of footnotes to substantiate his assertions. All of which greatly hurt his credibility, although I do find some areas of agreement. We agree that the great enemy of the people globally is the Money Power, although he uses another term. As with many essays I read, his would be severly red penciled and returned for a rewrite. There's a reason Chomsky writes like he does.
I have some problems with Moore's long-winded article too. But it seems to hit some of the capitalist devolution angles pretty well.
Sioux Rose
RV: Thanks for this post. It's one of the clearest descriptions of what's taking place that I've ever read, having read the big names trying to decipher what's going on from Deep Capture, on. WOW! This analysis truly nails it!
Thanx. The real credit belongs to Richard Moore, of course, but I found his original article to be a bit long-winded. So I tried to extract and summarize the relevant essence.
I think we're doomed. Revolution is the only solution. It's funny how a nation which is continuously murdering people in three different countries piously preaches nonviolence while characterizing the man who flew his plane into the IRS building in Austin as an insane murderer. Who's insane? Who are the murderers?
What about a constitutional amendment to authorize secession? That could introduce some chaos and even some creative destruction into the system and has the benefit of potentially gaining the support of millions of people on the right.
Will all of recently acquired U.S. imperial conquests also be allowed to secede? The military base closures alone could pay for a lot of "creative destruction" at home.
I was thinking that would be a likely, and welcome, consequence. The predatory leviathon would hopefully be disabled.
Tried it down here in the southland, didn't work out too well.
Sioux Rose
EAGLE BILL: This post should be sent to Bill Maher. You definitely see the illusions for what they are.
The tax cheaters destroyed Greece like the Prop 3 destroyed California.
I say tune in, turn on, drop out. We simply can't compete with the rich--but, really, there's no need to--left to their own devices they will burn out---consumed by their insane and endless greed. Meanwhile, you and I will live small,slow and sane. The turtle will win this race against the hare. Sure the Mongols might invade but they might just do it no matter who is running the show.
Sorry i don't think so. Turtle and hare. Get over it for goddess sake. The fucking
turtle has been assassinated by covert agents trained in the School of the Americas.
The goddamn turtle is being crushed by the fuckin hare because the turtle is so GD
stupid. The turtle will not friggin win the friggin race against the hare because
he's too busy watching Survivor or The Biggest Loser.
The Cap and Trade bill (and much else) will allow them to control everything to do with energy in your home and enter it with federal agents to tell you what you must or must not use. This is the means by which the oil, gas, coal and nuclear industry can say that your home solar or wind or water systems that get you off the grid are not approved by the government so not acceptable.
Here is what the US must do, besides rejecting Cap and Trade, and the food safety bills, which are even more terrifying. http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/s-510-is-hissing-in-the-grass/
EU/IMF REVOLT:
GREECE, ICELAND, LATVIA MAY LEAD THE WAY
Ellen Brown, December 7th, 2009
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/eu_imf.php
Europe’s small, debt-strapped countries could follow the lead of Argentina and simply walk away from their debts. That would shift the burden to the creditor countries, which could solve the problem merely by a change in accounting rules.
Total financial collapse, once a problem only for developing countries, has now come to Europe. The International Monetary Fund is imposing its “austerity measures” on the outer circle of the European Union, with Greece, Iceland and Latvia the hardest hit. But these are not your ordinary third world debtor supplicants. Historically, Iceland was settled by the Vikings, who successfully invaded Britain; Latvian tribes repulsed even the Vikings; and the Greeks conquered the whole Persian empire. If anyone can stand up to the IMF, these stalwart European warriors can.
Hate to say this but, there is no cure for 'financial insanity'. There would have to be a collective epiphany and I don't see that happening.
Human enlightenment is long gone and it ain't coming back.
Financial power, money, and the accummulation of it, drives and regulates everything about us and society. Every aspect of our lives is entangled in this suffocating financial web. It decides who lives and who dies. It decides who gets to win and who gets to lose. It decides everything but not with any amount of justice. Financial power ... that must be so intoxicating ... yeah, that must be it, they're drunk with the power to shake up the world. Then to have us all grovel, then beg to carry the weight so they can be free to put things back together, like it was.
oh please, oh please master of the markets ... if things could only be as they once were it would all be okay. oh please, oh please master of the markets ... tell me you can make things alright.
"1.Our pensions and 401ks will continue on their roller coaster ride, driven by market chaos and high-speed computer cacophony."
Anyone who puts money into the stock market for an investment of their 401K is foolish.
The stock market is a big crooked casino. Nothing more.
The crux of the matter:
"Hey, Mr. banker! What does the finance sector do?"
"Well, I'm glad you asked that, Billy. You see, through the miracle of the invisible hand, the finance sector places the proper value on everything in the economy; from macadamia nuts to prison guard salaries! This is a boon for proper capital investment!"
"Gosh, Mr. banker! In that case, what does the finance sectors invisible hand say the finance sector itself is worth?"
"Well, that depends, Billy. How much do you have?"
i dont understand it... the net-net of 401k's since 2000... HAS to be negative... and i'd bet dollars to donuts... the value lost exceeds the cost to close it out and take the 10% penalty... and don't forget the tons of money in churning and fees every quarter buy buying and selling within the account... and the SAME compound interest and matching that gives 401k's the upside... can be MORE THAN offset by the hidden or virtually undiscernable management and transaction fees...
so... why do people leave THEIR dreams locked up with criminals...
that's like asking the local punks and thugs to watch your house while you're away...
it won't be there when you come back...
Remember the old Tom Lehrer song?
"They're rioting in Africa, ladadeda de do da, they're _____ in Greece...."
And Thailand. And doubtless other places we don't hear about.
I think RV's comments earlier have it about right. Esp. his:
"Expressing your sentiments out loud, however, is likely to be increasingly unwise."
As it is, and has been for decades the federal government has been acting with impunity even on the domestic front. What is now increasing is "trickle-down impunity" for example as cash-strapped local governments think up new ways to raise revenue. For example, a local resident just wrote in the local newspaper that he was pulled over by TWO squad cars and questioned and then charged with...not wearing a seat belt, which is supposed to be a secondary offense. The local resident reported that one of the cops just happened to say he was a nephew of the County Prosecutor. The local resident is a land owner in two counties in two states, yet the message was clear: don't try to fight city hall.
(And, yes, I know, that he is a property owner shouldn't matter in issues of equal treatment, but it is simply a fact that cops make all sorts of subjective decisions about who to charge and with what and how.)
The trickle-down effect of federal economic corruption is starting to impact the daily lives of local people and their relations with ever-more-desperate local governments. The criminal bailout of Wall Street is truly starting to hit home.
If yore local county sheriff is spending all his time and budget on processing foreclosures and kicking people out of their homes, how much time is he spending fighting crime? Thus the run on ammo...
Oh, and since I'm rambling a bit tonight, how come they don't require seat belts on school buses? Next time you're pulled over, get out of your vehicle and stand by your closed door with your hands visible to the officer. (By getting out of the car you have voided the seat belt issue...) He will probably tell you to get back in the vehicle. The next decision is yours. You violated no (known) law by getting out of your car when pulled over (in fact I was specifically taught to do this by a major newspaper I worked for. We were told that this should reduce the cop's fear that you might be carrying.)
Failing to obey a lawful order can really clog up the system...and the paperwork on a seatbelt violation can be discouraging. The local jails are way too full, so you'll probably be let off with a warning or an admonition, unless you are a person of interest, in which case...you can get a pretty quick lesson in who is running things.
FASTEN YORE SEAT BELTS!
-30-
"4. Little countries that falter, like Greece, will continue to put the whole global economy at risk."
And it is no surprise the origins of these problems can be traced back to the US.
“…officially the US is a democracy and US policy is to bind people to corporate patronage and peonage not to democratic institutions. So when the US enforced its control over Greece, first through the Truman Doctrine and then through covert NATO support of the “Colonels”, it was determined to control the state and thus the country’s resources...”
http://www.counterpunch.org/wilkinson05142010.html
Actually they can be traced direct to short sales by Goldman Sachs. Small world isn't it? Funny how 6 degrees of separation doesn't take into account these cozy-upped " market making " business adventures. The Shock Doctrine is alive and well and the people on the streets of Athens have read the book and see the handwriting on the walls. The walls just happen to be 5000 years old.
EU/IMF REVOLT:
GREECE, ICELAND, LATVIA MAY LEAD THE WAY
Ellen Brown, December 7th, 2009
http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/eu_imf.php
Europe’s small, debt-strapped countries could follow the lead of Argentina and simply walk away from their debts. That would shift the burden to the creditor countries, which could solve the problem merely by a change in accounting rules.
Total financial collapse, once a problem only for developing countries, has now come to Europe. The International Monetary Fund is imposing its “austerity measures” on the outer circle of the European Union, with Greece, Iceland and Latvia the hardest hit. But these are not your ordinary third world debtor supplicants. Historically, Iceland was settled by the Vikings, who successfully invaded Britain; Latvian tribes repulsed even the Vikings; and the Greeks conquered the whole Persian empire. If anyone can stand up to the IMF, these stalwart European warriors can.
Nothing- absolutely nada will get better for the fascist amerikan empire as long as amerikan terrorism continues- thats the terrorism of occupacion, drones, torture, environmental destruction.....the true cost of amerikan imperialism is destroying the heart and soul of its people/ its very existence !
tioche, Mexico
No, Greece can lead on this. And we should all learn.
Web of Debt - EU/IMF REVOLT: GREECE, ICELAND, LATVIA MAY LEAD THE WAY
Dec 7, 2009 ... Ellen Brown article: EU/IMF REVOLT: GREECE, ICELAND, LATVIA MAY LEAD THE ... Standing up to the IMF is not a well-worn path, but Argentina ...
www.webofdebt.com/articles/eu_imf.php
The American people sense something is wrong ....
Are they aware this has been planned in advance and includes many other kinds of take overs here besides money? Look at S 510 and what they plan to do using food as the cover. http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/s-510-is-hissing-in-the-grass/
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries.“– David Rockefeller, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.
Here is the schedule the bankers and others have had the US on for its dismantling. They intend to end democracy here and set up the NAU and a NWO.
Watch all 9. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2D4-noTiCg