Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Showdown on Wall Street and K Street
The shake-out of the American economy has left a handful of large banks at the pinnacle of the American corporate power structure. Next week, a coalition of major community organizations, unions, and religious groups will launch a campaign to challenge the economic and political influence of these mega-banks, beginning with a series of protests in San Francisco, Kansas City, Charlotte, Chicago, New York, and Washington, D.C.
As a growing number of banks have collapsed and been gobbled up by larger institutions, the four biggest commercial banks - the Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, and Citigroup - now control about 40% of the nation's $8 trillion in bank deposits. The two largest investment banks - Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley - hold one-third of the securities industry's $4.4 trillion in assets.
"We want to use this moment and the rage that the American people have at banks as a way to get into the bigger issues of how Wall Street banks and corporate power have sabotaged the economy and enriched themselves," explained Stephen Lerner, a veteran organizer with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), who heads the union's campaign on financial reform.
The organizing campaign is spearheaded three community organizing networks - PICO, National People's Action (NPA), and the southeast region of the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) - along with SEIU and the AFL-CIO. Organizers believe that the recent victory on health care reform will help propel a similar movement to take on banking giants.
"There's only one group of people in this country who are more hated than insurance companies," Lerner said. "That's the banks and Wall Street. This is not complicated. A bunch of rich, greedy oligarchs crashed the economy and got bailed out by tax payers."
A new public opinion poll sponsored by the nonpartisan Pew Economic Policy Group confirms Lerner's observation. A national survey conducted in March found that 68% of the public have an unfavorable opinion of big banks. Two-thirds of the public blame either the big banks or Congress' failure to regulate banks for the current financial crisis. Seventy-nine percent think it is important for Congress to take action quickly to reform Wall Street's abuses.
To help channel public outrage, the coalition's short-term goal is to push Congress to enact strong consumer protection regulations on the financial industry. Their intermediate goal is to pressure banks to stop the epidemic of foreclosures and renegotiate mortgages so owners can keep their homes. Their long-term goal is to limit the banking industry's political clout and its economic influence. They believe banking should be reorganized so it invests in good jobs, affordable housing, and environmentally-friendly businesses.
"The big banks shattered our economy and left workers and our communities to clean up the pieces. We've lost 8 million jobs, 1 out of every 8 mortgages is in default or foreclosure, and our cities, counties and states teeter on the edge of bankruptcy," said Heather Booth, executive director of Americans for Financial Reform, a coalition of unions, consumer, and community organizations. "Now the same banks that we bailed out with billions of tax dollars are pouring $1.4 million per day into the Senate to stop real Wall Street reform."
"This is a fight about which side are you on -- Main Street or Wall Street? Main Street is organizing, forcing the politicians to decide whether they follow the money or support the American people," Booth noted.
Just as activists hope that voters will reward Congressmembers in November who supported health care reform, they want voters to re-elect politicians who support bank reform and punish politicians who are in the pockets of the bank lobby.
The protests will take place just as the Senate will be debating and voting on bank reform legislation. Progressive Democrats want the bill to include strong consumer protections, requirements that banks renegotiate mortgages for families facing foreclosure, limits on the size of banks, and new regulations against Wall Street gambling with default swaps and derivatives.
The banking industry and its business allies are pushing hard to weaken the proposed regulations. In the past few months, the major banks, along with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have dramatically increased their lobbying activities and campaign donations to thwart reform. Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, has become the banking industry's top ally, but every other Republican and some Democrats also oppose any reform that bank lobbyists don't like.
To rally public opinion, President Barack Obama gave a speech Thursday at Cooper Union in New York, close to Wall Street, and insisted that Congress needed to rein in the risky practices that led to the financial crisis and the recession. He criticized the "battalions of financial industry lobbyists descending on Capitol Hill, as firms spend millions to influence the outcome of this debate."
"It is essential that we learn from the lessons of this crisis, so we don't doom ourselves to repeat it," Obama said. "And make no mistake: That is exactly what will happen if we allow this moment to pass. And that's an outcome that is unacceptable to me, and it's unacceptable to you, the American people."
"Unless your business model depends on bilking people, there's little to fear from these new rules," Obama said to an audience of 700 people that included Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein and executives from JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, and other financial powerhouses.
"I want to urge you to join us, instead of fighting us in this effort,I'm here because I believe that these reforms are, in the end, not only in the best interest of our country, but in the best interest of the financial sector."
For the activists, the battle to overhaul federal banking regulations is one part of a broader strategy. "We have one eye on winning significant financial reform now and one eye on building a movement for corporate accountability," explained George Goehl, executive director of NPA, which has 25 community organizing affiliates in 14 states.
On Tuesday, April 27, organizers expect more than a thousand consumers, union members, and clergy to march through downtown San Francisco to Wells Fargo's annual shareholder meeting at the Merchants Exchange Building. Some of the protesters who have purchased Wells Fargo stock will confront the board of directors with a list of demands. On that day in Kansas City, family farmers, retirees, veterans and union members from Missouri, Kansas, and Iowa will march through that city's financial district to the Bank of America, an action that organizers are calling "showdown in the heartland."
The following day in Charlotte, N.C., veterans, clergy, and working families hurt by foreclosures and lay-offs will rally at the First United Presbyterian Church and then, proxies in hand, march to Bank of America's annual shareholder meeting at Belk Theater, while in Chicago, unions, community groups, and faith-based activists will march to the corporate offices of Goldman Sachs, whose outrageous executive bonuses, illegal practices, and political influence-peddling have made it the poster child for public anger against big banks. (Last week the Securities and Exchange Commission accused Goldman Sachs of defrauding investors). NPA started the ball rolling last month by announcing and organizing the April 29th march on Wall Street. Organizers now predict over 5,000 protesters, joined by AFL-CIO President Rich Trumka, will march on Thursday.
The protest actions will culminate in three-day "Showdown on K Street" in Washington, D.C. from May 15 to 17. The DC mobilization will focus attention on the connections between the banking industry's political clout through its huge campaign contributions and lobbying warchest. It will include a series of protests at the offices of corporate lobby groups and members of Congress - Democrats and Republicans -- with close ties to the banking establishment.
The protestors have a list of demands for each bank. In San Francisco, for example, they'll insist that Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf resign from the board of the Financial Services Roundtable, the powerful lobby group that represents the nation's largest banks and which is using its muscle to thwart the proposed federal Consumer Financial Protection Agency, one of the top priorities of the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats.
The grassroots delegation will also ask Wells Fargo to stop rampant foreclosures and evictions of homeowners and tenants.
"Everyday Americans from all walks of life are going to be challenging banks like Wells Fargo to keep families in their homes, to stop predatory and payday lending, and to start investing to create jobs and rebuild our communities" explained Adam Kruggel, director of CCISCO, a PICO affiliate in northern California. "Wells Fargo was one of the biggest subprime lenders in the United States and it has modified less than 8% of the troubled mortgages eligible under the president's Making Home Affordable program. That is unacceptable. It has an awful track record of predatory lending, including offering payday loans to its own customers at annual interest rates of 240%."
The bank reform coalition hopes to popularize a "move the money" campaign to help channel public anger with the banking establishment. Drawing on the boycott tactics of the civil rights and labor movements, and the divestment efforts that helped dismantle apartheid in South Africa, the campaign is based on the idea that Americans should move their money from mega-banks that destroy jobs and communities to financial institutions that act more responsibly.
"Can you imagine what would happen if we could get the major labor unions and religious denominations, and even some local governments, foundations, and universities, to take their pension funds, endowments, and deposits out of banks that engage in abusive practices and into banks that support our families and communities?" asked Gerald Taylor, the southeast director for IAF, a community organizing network with seven chapters in North Carolina, including one in Charlotte, where the Bank of America is headquartered.
In addition to mobilizing for federal reform legislation and pushing banks to address the foreclosure crisis, the coalition wants to draw attention to the banks' responsibility for state and municipal budget crises.
"Cities and states are cutting vital services, and laying off teachers and other employees, because the banks crashed the economy and starved local and state government of the revenues they need," explained Gordon Whitman, director of public policy for PICO, which has 1,200 religious congregations as members in over 150 cities.
"The compensation bonus pool for the big six banks - over $130 billion -- would solve the entire budget crisis for all the states," noted Lerner, the SEIU organizer.
Activists in different cities have been organizing people to push for municipal legislation to hold banks accountable for exacerbating local economic problems. In Oakland, for example, SEIU and several community groups have pressured the City Council to demand that banks renegotiate or cancel interest-rate swaps that cost the city $5.2 million in fees. In Los Angeles, SEIU, LA Voice (a PICO affiliate), and the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (a new organization formed by former leaders and staff of ACORN) worked with City Council member Richard Alarcon on legislation to renegotiate swap deals on municipal bonds and would require the City to move its investments (including $25 billion in pension funds and almost $1 billion in deposits) from financial institutions that failed to cooperate with local, state and national foreclosure-prevention efforts.
At least five states have introduced legislation to explore how their deposits in banks can be used to guarantee reinvestment in their state and more responsible lending practices.
Grassroots organizing against the power of banks goes back to the agrarian Populist movement in the late 1800s. In the 1970s, community organizing against redlining - racial discrimination in mortgage lending and bank divestment from inner cities - led to passage of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) in 1977, led by NPA. Over the past decade, ACORN, along with the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, the Center for Responsible Lending, and NPA, led the fight against predatory lending and the foreclosure epidemic. NPA is now mobilizing people in cities around the country to hold banks and bank regulators accountable. Two years ago, for example, NPA brought over 500 people to a protest at Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's house in Washington, D.C. Since then, NPA leaders have meet with Bernanke three times, pushing him and his staff to toughen regulations on rip-off "pay day" lenders and to update the CRA.
The battle for bank reform has triggered new alliances. This is the first time that PICO, NPA, and IAF have worked together on a common campaign. And the recent involvement of the labor movement in the battle against Wall Street and the big banks injects additional political clout into the activist coalition.
"We need stronger reform of Wall Street, but we also need a new business model for banking," said PICO's Whitman. "We need to get back to the day when people could trust their banks and banks made their money by lending to homeowners and small businesses, not speculating in the Wall Street casino. We want to squeeze speculation out of the banking system. This is about rebuilding our communities and our economy."
More information about
the
activities in each city and the coalition's broader agenda can be found
at: http://showdowninamerica.org
and http://www.ourmoneyourvalues.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


23 Comments so far
Show AllThe problem is not mainly the size of the banks or the regulation of them. The problem is enforcing the existing regulations, since the regulators are pretty well all captive.
Yes, money has a way of keeping people captive, especially when they rely on maintaining a career on Capitol Hill. Like Bob Dylan said, "It may be the devil or it may be the lord, but you're gonna have to serve somebody". We all know the majority are not serving their constituents. Most have sold their souls.
Congress is responsible.
But those slim balls in Congress will return to their districts and convince the ignorant and lazy that they tried, but others in Congress defeated their best efforts. Of the stupid and lazy, which are and overwhelming preponderance of the voters, they will re-elect the shill back to the peoples house.
Good Grief.
PICO is delusional in wanting to "squeeze speculation out of the banking industry".
Speculation is only a problem when its not regulated.
If New Deal regulations were restored you would keep banks from growing larger than $100 billion in assets, make banking activities transparent, and separate investment banking, insurance and commercial banking.
If speculation was transparent and separated from insurance and commercial banking the speculators could fail by the millions and the only cost to taxpayers would be cleaning their splattered bodies off the streets after they jumped out of windows.
Rather than solving any of the causes of the 2008 meltdown, Obama's bankster bill will enable more speculation and more bailouts.
"The problem is enforcing the existing regulations"
That's one piece, and certainly, the SEC and other regulatory agencies could use a shake-up.
But most of what these people are doing is legal. The suit against GoldamnSachs, where they assembled a CDO that they knew would fail and sold it as a good investment, was only illegal because they failed to include, deep in the fine print, a mention that the hedger that picked the lemons was shorting. From what I gather, this kind of backhanded deal goes on all the time and the "notification" requirement is met so inconspicuosly that investors don't notice it.
Notification or not, it seems like outright fraud and as such, should be illegal. And it's only one of scores of different scams, that are also currenly legal.
In order to have effective enforcement, the regulations have to be in place.
A big addition to the problem: our culture of greed and profits of the few vs. the well-being of all.
Only a fool would trust Obama and the Democrats to do right by the American people. This will turn out to be another corporate welfare scam dressed up as reform. The mainstream media will be called upon to sell it to the sheeple.
Never fear, just such an aged stooge (Chris Dodd) is on the scene:
Dodd is associated with the AIG bonus mini-scandal, and with accepting some questionable loans from Countrywide. He takes a lot of money from the financial industry and comes from a wealthy state that is home to many hedge funds and insurance companies. And his manner is distinctly senatorial and patrician at a time when bare-bones populism is all the rage.
Retiring this year and good riddence. Chris Dood is writing his resume for the job hunt. Expect him to become a lobbyist for one or another of the Financial groups next year and rake in the cash.
We are facing an interesting primary season in CT to replace Mr Dood, The Republican side pits former Representative and former spook Rob Simmons against Linda McMahon of World Wresting Federation fame. That's two different nightmares battling each other.
On the Democrats side, our worthless Attorney General, Dick Blumenthal Vs an unknown but EXCELLENT progressive challenger: Merrick Alpert. The Greens are not running a Senate challenge this cycle but the New London Greens have been meeting with Merrick, interviewed him for local cable and he seems to be excellent in his positions. As such, he probably stands a third party's chance in the Primary because Blumenthal has massive incumbent-party machine advantages. In debates, Merrick mopped the floor with him, as did McMahon, Blumenthal will probably get the nod anyway and could lose to McMahon. Even if he wins, he's a Lie berman clone so our delegation is likely to go even farther to the right.
Good luck. For the last thirty years the apostoles of supply-side economics have sold the manufacturing soul of America to the whims of the archbishops of finance inside their cathedral banks, letting the production-based backbone in the country go to rot in favor of outsourcing major industries responsible for the employment of millions of Americans to third world countries where lax regulations and much lower labor costs mean ever larger corporate profits. It is of course, at least a start but it ought to be understood that the road ahead will be hard and riddled with obstacles since the entire banking industry has undergone an extreme makeover in the last thirty years or so. Unless the federal government begins a concerted program of subsidizing local credit unions whose self-interest is intrinsically tied to the long-term prosperity of the communities in which they do business, we can expect more shenanigans from the perpetual gamers of the system to come up with repeated schemes to get around any new rules of the game.
It is high time for American culture to grow up to the notion that the models of raw capitalism are broken and there are not enough geological years in the planet to go on hitting and missing our way through implementation of its flawed, near-sighted ethos. Beware of the economic propagandists ready to declare victory in a jobless recovery. The real economic indicator of sane growth in a free society ought to be the rising living standards of its middle and working classes coupled with vibrant commercial industries. This translates not just to available work opportunities but GOOD employment with cost of living adjusted for inflation wages. It is difficult to contemplate a steady and constructive progression towards such an end of greater economic parity inside the "grab all you can" mindset which remains a staple of Americana.
Obama has proven to be as much a supply-sider as Ronny Raygun.
""To rally public opinion, President Barack Obama gave a speech Thursday at Cooper Union in New York, close to Wall Street, and insisted that Congress needed to rein in the risky practices that led to the financial crisis and the recession. He criticized the "battalions of financial industry lobbyists descending on Capitol Hill, as firms spend millions to influence the outcome of this debate."
Obama is the guy who got most of his campaign contributions from the financial industry and the second largest single contributor was Goldman Sachs.
Give me a break. The reform will look pretty, but when she smiles she will have no teeth.
Yes, Obama is telling the banksters to "join us" in crafting bankster "reform" just like the insurance industry and drug industry "joined us" to craft one of the biggest corporate welfare programs in history disguised as health care "reform".
Obama is the best Republican the Democrats ever had.
deleted by poster
Here is a link that has the details of how our system went south.
http://www.henryckliu.com/page222.html
The description of activities and events designed to impact an egregious situation, i.e. corruption in our financial system; the emergence of new allies united in the desire for change is heartening and inspiring, my thanks to the author for this article. The people and organizations you describe realize there comes a time when action is required. I am glad to know that others sense the spirit of this country and its residence in the heart of the people. That “Same Spirit” ended Jim Crow as we knew it then and gave women the right to vote. That “Same Spirit” will right this great ship of America. This article is evidence of "things unseen, the substance of things hoped for". We can join this spirit or we can stay "on the misty flats".
Isn't it obvious now that the system of government that the founding fathers handed down to us is what's gotten us into this mess. So many built-in mechanisms for frustrting popular rule. No surprise then. that depite the impending doom, not only is our government doing nothing to avert the unthinkable, it's favoring the very interests (fossil fuel, for example) that are responsible for global warming. Which raises the question as to why we stick with politics as usual? Doesn't this amount to doing the same thing over and over again and each time expecting a different outcome, behavior which just happens to fit one definition of insanity? But if not same old same old status quo, then what? Well, given that time's running out, the only action that has any chance of turning things around; namely, our rising up en masse and changing the world. Impossible? Isn't that what was said two decades ago in regards to the possibility of a popular uprising bringing down the Soviet Empire? Yet overnight isn't that what happened?
Below, an article that partly UNCOVERS the often-unmentioned reason of "why foreigners come to the USA"....
because most countries also DO NOT TAX their citizens (even those that hold double citizenship) - when they work abroad, such as in the USA...and this is probably quite commong among developing countries who don't hound their citizens with double taxes.
AMERICA , is the "only industrialized country that Double-Taxes"...
but THAT is just ONE reason. another of course is America's hubris bringing its own "blowback" FROM WITHIN its own citizenry....abroad...who
eseentially "LEAVE" america.
I had often said it for a few years now - the time will come when americans WILL see the other end of the stick - when it is THEY that will be seeking "havens"
ABROAD...and the USA will no longer be able to intone "people come here because we are the greatest"....a generation from now...the children of today's america will NOT be able to maintain an attitude of ASSUMED superiority of citizenship..for THEY might find they will need the Tolerance and accomodation of OTHERS .
===============
April 25, 2010
MORE AMERICAN EXPATRIATES GIVE UP CITIZENSHIP
By BRIAN KNOWLTON
WASHINGTON — Amid mounting frustration over taxation and banking problems, small but growing numbers of overseas Americans are taking the weighty step of renouncing their citizenship.
“What we have seen is a substantial change in mentality among the overseas community in the past two years,” said Jackie Bugnion, director of American Citizens Abroad, an advocacy group based in Geneva. “Before, no one would dare mention to other Americans that they were even thinking of renouncing their U.S. nationality. Now, it is an openly discussed issue.”
The Federal Register, the government publication that records such decisions, shows that 502 expatriates gave up their U.S. citizenship or permanent residency status in the last quarter of 2009. That is a tiny portion of the 5.2 million Americans estimated by the State Department to be living abroad.
Still, 502 was the largest quarterly figure in years, more than twice the total for all of 2008, and it looms larger, given how agonizing the decision can be. There were 235 renunciations in 2008 and 743 last year. Waiting periods to meet with consular officers to formalize renunciations have grown.
Anecdotally, frustrations over tax and banking questions, not political considerations, appear to be the main drivers of the surge. Expat advocates say that as it becomes more difficult for Americans to live and work abroad, it will become harder for American companies to compete.
American expats have long complained that the United States is the only industrialized country to tax citizens on income earned abroad, even when they are taxed in their country of residence, though they are allowed to exclude their first $91,400 in foreign-earned income.
One Swiss-based business executive, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of sensitive family issues, said she weighed the decision for 10 years. She had lived abroad for years but had pleasant memories of service in the U.S. Marine Corps.
Yet the notion of double taxation — and of future tax obligations for her children, who will receive few U.S. services — finally pushed her to renounce, she said.
“I loved my time in the Marines, and the U.S. is still a great country,” she said. “But having lived here 20 years and having to pay and file while seeing other countries’ nationals not having to do that, I just think it’s grossly unfair.”
“It’s taxation without representation,” she added.
ARTICLE CONTINUED
===========================
Stringent new banking regulations — aimed both at curbing tax evasion and, under the Patriot Act, preventing money from flowing to terrorist groups — have inadvertently made it harder for some expats to keep bank accounts in the United States and in some cases abroad.
Some U.S.-based banks have closed expats’ accounts because of difficulty in certifying that the holders still maintain U.S. addresses, as required by a Patriot Act provision.
“It seems the new anti-terrorist rules are having unintended effects,” Daniel Flynn, who lives in Belgium, wrote in a letter quoted by the Americans Abroad Caucus in the U.S. Congress in correspondence with the Treasury Department.
“I was born in San Francisco in 1939, served my country as an army officer from 1961 to 1963, have been paying U.S. income taxes for 57 years, since 1952, have continually maintained federal voting residence, and hold a valid American passport.”
Mr. Flynn had held an account with a U.S. bank for 44 years. Still, he wrote, “they said that the new anti-terrorism rules required them to close our account because of our address outside the U.S.”
Kathleen Rittenhouse, who lives in Canada, wrote that until she encountered a similar problem, “I did not know that the Patriot Act placed me in the same category as terrorists, arms dealers and money launderers.”
Andy Sundberg, another director of American Citizens Abroad, said, “These banks are closing our accounts as acts of prudent self-defense.” But the result, he said, is that expats have become “toxic citizens.”
The Americans Abroad Caucus, headed by Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, Democrat of New York, and Representative Joe Wilson, Republican of South Carolina, has made repeated entreaties to the Treasury Department.
In response, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner wrote Ms. Maloney on Feb. 24 that “nothing in U.S. financial law and regulation should make it impossible for Americans living abroad to access financial services here in the United States.”
But banks, Treasury officials note, are free to ignore that advice.
“That Americans living overseas are being denied banking services in U.S. banks, and increasingly in foreign banks, is unacceptable,” Ms. Maloney said in a letter Friday to leaders of the House Financial Services Committee, requesting a hearing on the question.
Mr. Wilson, joining her request, said that pleas from expats for relief “continue to come in at a startling rate.”
Relinquishing citizenship is relatively simple. The person must appear before a U.S. consular or diplomatic official in a foreign country and sign a renunciation oath. This does not allow a person to escape old tax bills or military obligations.
Now, expats’ representatives fear renunciations will become more common.
“It is a sad outcome,” Ms. Bugnion said, “but I personally feel that we are now seeing only the tip of the iceberg.”
Simplest solution, don't take a job overseas! Oh, by the way, in alot of these foreign countries with their tendencies for social democracy, (Europe for example) it would not surprise me if these people are paying more taxes over there than they would have to pay here. Of course they are not going to tell you about the subsidized healthcare, the shorter work week, and most of these contries have mandatory vacation time. The people of other countries aren't as selfish and grasping as Americans have become.
The first $91,000 is tax free?!!
And we're supposed to feel sorry for these runaways?
Obviously most are quite wealthy, and there money means more to them then their native country.
I won't be shedding a tear for these folks.
This coalition of organizations attempting to take on the big banks are trying to put out a fire that they themselves are responsible for.
Can you imagine why? It's very simple. These organizations endorsed elite candidates in the elections. These organizations thereby endorsed laissez-faire capitalist business as ususal.
They could have endorsed third-party progressive candidates. But they didn't. And so now, they get to pay the piper for the choice they made, i.e. we place the responsibility on THEM.
I really rankles whenever someone mentions the "victory" of health care. It was not a victory. It's a win-win for the corporate coffers and not much, if anything, for the people. Why is this considered a victory? Why would anyone want to use this as an impetus for meaningful financial reform?
BTW, I heard in passing by the radio this morning that this bill is now about 1,000 pages at this point. Another 2,000 pages and we should be set to go with another corporate-written bonanza, which GS's golden boy Obama will be more than happy to sign and Congress (Dems) will self-congratulate themselves on.