EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Obama Cans Regulator Who Crossed Wall Street
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
Popular content
Today's Top News
‘High Quality Real Estate Business’
I'm too embarrassed to tell you about all of the violent revenge fantasies I played out in my mind after my car was broken into two weeks ago. Even being the victim of petty crime was enough to trigger an inexplicable urge for retribution.
But in my more reflective moments, I realize that kind of emotional response -- which has also characterized the broader debate on the politics of crime fighting -- is about as productive as shoveling snow in a blizzard.
Last week, the Congressional Research Service published a report on the "Economic Impacts of Prison Growth," providing a useful check on the spirit of vengeance that has dominated penal politics going back to former Gov. Nelson Rockefeller's mandatory sentencing laws in the state of New York in 1973.
"The U.S. corrections system has gone through an unprecedented expansion during the last few decades with a more than 400% jump in the prison population and a corresponding boom in the prison construction. At the end of 2008, 2.3 million adults were in state, local, or federal custody, with another $5.1 million on probation or parole...Globally, the United States has 5% of the world's population but 25% of its prisoners."
What's fueled the growth, the report says, is "tough drug enforcement, stringent sentencing laws, and high rates of recidivism."
Who cares? Well, as the report goes on to point out, this "historic, sustained rise in incarceration has broad implications, not just for the criminal justice system, but for the larger economy."
The U.S. prison industry now directly employs about 777,000 people and the Labor Department expects the prison labor market to grow 9% by 2018, accompanied by a projected 16% increase in the number of parole and probation officers. "By comparison, there were 880,000 workers employed in the entire U.S. auto manufacturing sector."
Of course, there's a host of moral and social dilemmas created by high rates of imprisonment -- "increased income inequality and more concentrated poverty" and "the fact that African Americans and Hispanics are far more likely than whites to be incarcerated," for starters.
But whatever you may think about the plight of the incarcerated and their families, what no one concerned about budgets can ignore is the growing cost. In 2008 alone, taxpayers spent $68.7 billion to feed, clothe, house and provide Supreme Court affirmed medical care for prisoners -- a 688% increase since 1982. In fact, "during the past three decades correctional spending has risen nearly twice as fast as state spending on education, health care, and social service programs."
Because of these costs, CRS observes, "the corrections sector is in stress as states seek to reduce prison populations and rein in costs." It's gotten to the point where Gov. Schwarzenegger has suggested amending the California state constitution to keep prison spending from exceeding spending on higher education.
The alarming "cost-containment" trend of the past few decades has been to privatize prisons, despite studies that have called into question whether for-profit prisons are actually more cost-effective, even as they may stifle economic development in areas where they are located; to say nothing of what cost-cutting means for the work environment of correctional officers and the living conditions of inmates.
Right now, there are two bills in the Senate and three in the House relating to prison reform, including one of the more far-reaching proposals (S. 714) that would establish a commission to "review all areas of federal and state criminal justice costs, practices and policies" and "make recommendations for changes in policies and laws to address (the) findings."
Even though I'd love to flog whoever broke into my car, it's that kind of mind-set that got us into this police-state mess. So as Congress gets ready to deal with rising prison costs and incarceration rates, it wouldn't be a bad idea to inject a dose of Karl Menninger common sense.
In his book "The Crime of Punishment" Menninger noted that most prisoners will eventually be released and if we focus on retribution but forget about rehabilitation, the only thing we're doing is ensuring more future crime victims by taking people with problems, making them worse, and then turning them loose on an unsuspecting public.
You make think that's "soft on crime" or that punishment is a necessary deterrent but then you'd have to explain how nearly four decades of "get tough" policies haven't deterred recidivism.
If having the highest incarceration rate in the industrialized world bothers you, bother Congress and the letters-to-the-editor page about it. If you're a scoundrel, invest in Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), the nation's largest private prison firm who reported $1.6 billion in revenues last year, up 32 percent from 2002. Pershing Square Capital Management, a prominent New York-based hedge fund, bought 9.5% share in CCA and presented it to investors as a "high quality real estate business."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



15 Comments so far
Show AllSean, as usual, getting right to the heart of matters.
from the article:
[What's fueled the growth, the report says, is "tough drug enforcement, stringent sentencing laws, and high rates of recidivism."
Who cares? Well, as the report goes on to point out, this "historic, sustained rise in incarceration has broad implications, not just for the criminal justice system, but for the larger economy."]
I care. The charade that is drug classification is well documented. The fact that this growing segment of our economic system is based on that charade, and millions of lives are ruined in the process, is something I definitely care about.
Was the caring question facetious?
The 'drug' war: make a substance illegal, cultivate and sell the substance, use the illegal profits for illegal purchases that supplement your cottage industry, and kill or imprison any victims you wish along the way for private profit...
take your life back, citizen! take the land back...
September 22, 2012...let's get those gardens growing!
Good post Dubet. It is unbelieveable, after all of these years of complete failure, that we still try to prohibit drugs and impose other laws that do nothing more than force the moral standards of one group of people on another that has different views.
Since Nixon kicked off the war on drugs, the number of non-violent users imprisoned for possession or low level dealing have skyrocketed, drug prices have dropped, political and law enforcement corruption has skyrocketed, abuse of civil rights has drastically increased, property crime has increased, drug potency has increased all while the national addiction rate has increased rather than decreasing. It's way past time to eliminate the War on Drugs and give people the freedom to consume whatever they as adults choose to consume as long as they don't encroach on the rights of others in the process, just as we currently do with alcohol and tobacco.
One of the biggest arguements in favor of maintaining drug prohibition is to keep our children safe and away from the influence of illegal drugs. Well, drug dealers don't ask for ID. Additionally, since drugs are supplied by a criminal black market, the purity and dosage of street drugs is unknown, which obviously contributes to deaths from overdose. If drugs were to be legalized and regulated based on the relative danger posed by said drug, overdose deaths would plummet, property crimes would plummet because the inflated black market prices would have to compete with legally available substances that are far purer and safer, law enforcement could return to policing and preventing violent crime, the cost of incarceating non-violent people who use drugs would be eliminated, the fear of seeking treatment for addiction would be eliminated, and the violent drug cartels would collapse due to lack of money.
It seems like a no brainer to end drug prohibition and replace it with a policy of regulation and harm reduction, but unfortunately, our society has been accustomed to associating drugs and crime. Drug addiction is an illness that should be treated as a medical condition rather than a crime. Many of the drugs currently demonized are far less harmful than alcohol, but due to the lies and mis-information of the prohibition community, most are completely unaware of the realities surrounding the various drugs. Prohibition of a substance doesn't work and never will...prohibition of alcohol should have proven that point a long time ago. Unfortunately, because of the money behind the law enforcement/prison/industrial complex, it will be very difficult to reverse.
Hey, Aussidawg!
Thanks for your response!
it does look difficult to reverse...perhaps we need a new method of change?
Dubet, the War on Drugs is a real pet peeve of mine.
This is the biggest waste of taxpayer money (with the exception of course being the bailout of the banksters) that has ever existed. Why in the fuck are we using 14 billion tax dollars every year to enforce what good "Christians" (the same bunch who brought about Prohibition during the 1920's) believe to be "good morals"?
These "do-good" people are responsible for more death, destruction, and misery...not to mention dismissing the very morals they preach by lieing, stealing, and murdering everyone who dares think different than they wish.
As you are probably aware, *ALL* of our drug laws have a rascist origin. "Marihuana" was outlawed because of falsehoods about cannabis spread by Harry Anslinger...a relative to William Randolph Hearst who had a few hundred thousand acres of pulp that was lost in the Mexican-American War, as well as his paper industry being threatened by the more efficient hemp plant. Anslinger and Hearst were related by marriage. Blacks were demonized as attacking white women as a result of using cocaine, and of course the original drugs laws on opium were aimed at the Chinese immigrants, who again were accused of luring white women into their opium dens and raping them. Nixon then upped the ante by using the war on drugs as a political weapon against those who opposed his policies in Viet Nam. It's all a lie...the tales of heroin (which in pure phamecuetical doses of known strength is safer than aspirin and far safer than alcohol), the tales of people going crazy from weed, the tales of suicide by jumping from windows thinking they could fly from LSD (Art Linkletter's daughter committed suicide six months after her last dose of LSD due to abuse by her father...Art Linkletter)...the drug war is yet another fraud perpetrated by our government for monied interests.
I am so tired of hearing about intelligent people who cannot go to college because they cannot get Federal funding due to a drug charge, or non-violent people spending years in prison with those who commit violent crimes due to a minor non-violent drug charge, or those who cannot get public housing because of a non-violent drug charge, or those who contract AIDS because they cannot get clean needles, or those who die from a drug overdose because supplying the ER's with Narcan might show an endorsement of drug use, or those who cannot get drug treatment because they are afraid of prosecution, or those who suffer intractible pain because their doctor is afraid of prosecution...all of this because of our drug laws and *WE ARE PAYING FOR IT WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS!!!*
I am so fucking tired of hearing "good Christian" leaders talk about the evils of drugs while they go and hire male prostitutes and use illegal drugs complain about the immorality of drugs and prostitution. Bill Clinton, George W. Bu$h (Jr., not his daddy, Poppy only imported drugs through the CIA), and now Barack Obu$ha all used drugs, yet support the waste of our tax dollars on the drug war.
Dubet, why can't people see what a waste of both money and lives this has caused? It frustrates the shit out of me (BTW, I am one of those chronic pain patients who has a choice of using opiates or illegal weed for pain, and the legal meds. I have to jump through hoops to get because the doctor is so afraid of retaliation by DEA) that the majority (albeit getting smaller) still support this foolish policy? This is why Mexico is a war zone...our drug policies!
The truly abominible part of the drug war is the profiteers...law enforcement, prisons (private mostly), lawyers, judges...talk about a motley crew. We face severe financial difficulties, but as usual, the greedpigs will prevail while the public at large loses. *SIGH*
I appreciate your response as well! Take care Dubet:)
"This is the biggest waste of taxpayer money (with the exception of course being the bailout of the banksters) that has ever existed." You must have temporarily forgotten about the Department of Death and Destruction as the biggest waste of our tax monies.
OYE
"You must have temporarily forgotten about the Department of Death and Destruction as the biggest waste of our tax monies."
La verdad. MIRA!
Besides that point, aussiedawg has spelled it all out as far as the "War Against Citizens".
Looks like we may have a legalization of marijuana initiative on the ballot for November out here in California.
I still have to pick over the wording for the usual Black is White White is Black malarkey, though.
A good part of what were nice, homey towns in Tamaulipas and likely elsewhere are falling into open warfare just because American black ops people want to keep the street price in the states high for their cronies. The narcotraficantes are entering schools and abducting kids, drafting them as soldiers. People are staying home, staying low, and sandbagging their doors.
My thanks to all in the States who stay sober, stick to home-grown, or work to change the laws.
The last paragraph says it all.
Build it, and they will come. It's just business, folks!
The US has more human beings in prison, both per capita and absolutely, than either mainland China or the Russian Federation.
How can Gonsalves write on the subject without mentioning Angela Davis, who has rightly analyzed and documented the "prison industrial complex" of the Right, including their private contracting and contracted out slave labor?
Another "Liberal" who does not mention a serious leftist like Davis?
Davis is a great source, but one might also ask why he does not name Foucault. It's a little difficult to hit everyone every time.
The drug laws and the private prison system that feeds off them are creating a new class of slave laborers. The drug war is and has always been a war against the poor and others.
peacekeepertwo:Privatization never made sense to me. Private companies have to show a profit, Public institutions Don't.The cost of privation will always be greater, because o the profit factor is an additional cost.
Exactamundo.
Sean is one of the greats, always on point.