Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Mid-April Draws Out US Tax Bashers, Blue Dog Dems
Mid-April is surely one of the favorite times of the year for Republicans, Tea Party members and their covert allies, the Blue Dog Democrats. Much as they hate to pay taxes, they love the opportunity to remind hard-pressed Americans about their steep taxes and their evil consequences. One of their familiar chords is Europe as the land of high taxes and sluggish growth. The only problem with this tale is that the European experience raises a whole set of ethical and economic issues U.S. tax bashers may not want to face.
Steven Hill's recent book, "Europe's Promise," carefully examines taxation in Europe. For starters, he reminds us that measuring the level of taxation in not perfectly straightforward. Forbes Magazine compares high-tax, "miserable" Europe with the low-tax U.S. Forbes relies on the top marginal income tax rate, 52 percent in the Netherlands, for instance, with the top U.S. rate of 35 percent. But as Hill points out, the Dutch rate already includes its social security contribution.
In addition, in the U.S. there are state, local, and real estate taxes, which bring the U.S. figure close to the European. I would also add that the U.S. tendency to raise so much revenue at the state and local level often ends up disproportionately hurting poor and working-class people. States competing for businesses engage in a zero sum competition with other states via low income and corporate taxes and heavy use of sales taxes.
Discussions of tax misery also often fail to probe the question of just what is a tax. Many of us take a deep breath when we write that one large check to the state or the feds in April. How many of us, however, closely scrutinize those monthly phone, cable, cell phone, utility and Internet bills? And how about car registration and annual fees for hunting and clamming licenses? These all add up, and their impact is regressive, hitting working-class residents harder than the wealthy.
Both U.S. and European taxes, properly measured, are high, but for different reasons. Europeans fund a set of generous programs that better prepare its workers for the instabilities of a global economy. These include health care as well as pensions, broad unemployment compensation, college education and job retraining.
The U.S. welfare state, never as comprehensive as the European even during the height of the New Deal, is even more shriveled today. Conservatives would even go after Social Security; yet the out-of-control driver of U.S. tax policy is the Pentagon and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The U.S. spends more than 4 percent of its GNP on the military, as compared to less than 2 percent in Europe. The contrast is even sharper when interest on previous war debts, expenditures on the CIA, NSA, and Homeland Security are included.
Yet even with regard to the military, the U.S. shirks one of its major social responsibilities. If one were looking for an unfunded liability that may indeed bankrupt us, those wars would be a good place to start. The U.S. is already neglecting the plight of its physically and emotionally scarred veterans of this conflict. Complete default on the services owed these men and women is far more likely than default on government bonds.
Although the U.S. and Europe do take a substantial portion of citizens' income, high taxation is seldom the game-changing political issue in Europe. I suspect that many Europeans feel they are getting value for their taxes and also have more of a sense of national if not European- wide solidarity. More democratic political systems with ample opportunity for third parties and more diverse media blunt "taxation without representation" arguments.
In addition, in the U.S., a notion of "rugged individualism" often leads to an odd willingness to pay higher private insurance premiums than the lower taxes that would support a more generous and efficient health care system for everyone. The rhetoric of war buttresses our sense of exceptionalism and go-it-alone faith. Nonetheless, when tax time rolls around, even war is an abstraction. There is all too little in most residents' day-to-day experience to connect quality of life to the taxes they pay.
Welcome to the tea party!
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


7 Comments so far
Show AllWhenever I get into a debate about this issue, the other person consistently overlooks the other element that determines value. Americans may pay lower taxes than people do in Europe, but what are we really getting for our money?
For example, a strong national defense is necessary, but on a day-to-day basis, most of that military spending benefits the defense contractors. Seems to me that the average American citizen gets a whole lot less day-to-day benefits than the average European citizen. We could drastically trim the Pentagon budget without any risk of foreign armies marching down our streets.
Same thing with bailouts for Wall Street con-artists. If they threaten to totally collapse the nation's economy if their demands are not met, these crooks should be tossed out on the street and have their zombie banks nationalized.
It boggles my mind that (as the author mentioned), we, as a culture, would rather pay more for an inferior product--just to uphold an ideology.
Not only that but people who make a big hoot about lower taxes never bother to talk about the higher costs of living. Tax refunds are just a way of dazzling people into believing that they're getting "relief" when in fact that "relief" cannot substitute for things like rising monthly payments, shrinking 401ks and stocks that people rely on, and what you mentioned on public services.
Also, a tax-cut is only to the benefit of the bankster. Gov't carries on (the ONLY institute that really IS too big to fail), & borrows from the banksters to continue governance, thus incurring DEBT, which means INTEREST paid on that debt, which is only a TAX (imperial TRIBUTE) that's paid to banksters. What a f*cked up system that we must borrow our own money from private banksters, instead of having our US Treasury print up Greenbacks for funds.This is the essence of converting a democratic nation/state (OURS'), into a tool for EMPIRE (the enemy's).
I.E. "...the banks own this place..."
So the author doesn't think we pay high enough taxes as is? When you take into account property, sales, gas, phone, capital gains taxes etc, you end up given away half your income to Uncle Sam. More importantly what is this money used for? Well, just over half your taxes funds the military. So I would think not paying your taxes would far more beneficial to world peace than anything I could think of.
Back during the good ole days of FDR, military spending accounted for 37 percent of our GDP. Thanks to war bonds and soaking the rich, it gave the American military the capability to annihilate hundreds of thousands of Europeans and Japanese, destroy their homes and historic buildings, and gave us the stepping stone to create a world empire.
Many of those taxes you mention do not go to Uncle Sam - they go to Uncle Harrisburg, Uncle Brentwood School District, Uncle Albany, Uncle Sacramento, or, especially if you are poor, Uncle Olympia. State and local taxes in most states are terribly regressive - the embodiment of reverse-Robin Hood. In Washington State (where I am temporarily right now) someone in the bottom 20% pays 17% of their income in state and local taxes. Someone in the top 1% income pays 2%.
So much for this great, progressive "Cascadia Republic". Saw a big campaign office for Obama's sorry healthcare plan in downtown Olympia too. What a shame to see this honored childhood home of Rachael Corrie to be full of liberals but few leftists. The beer is nothing special too.
It's just a figure of speech. What I'm getting at is that they go to some sort of government.