Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Your Tax Dollars at War: More Than 53% of Your Tax Payment Goes to the Military
If you're like me, now that we're in the week that federal income taxes are due, you are finally starting to collect your records and prepare for the ordeal. Either way, whether you are a procrastinator like me, or have already finished and know how much you have paid to the government, it is a good time to stop and consider how much of your money goes to pay for our bloated and largely useless and pointless military.
The budget for the 2011 fiscal year, which has to be voted by Congress by this Oct. 1, looks to be about $3 trillion, not counting the funds collected for Social Security (since the Vietnam War, the government has included the Social Security Trust Fund in the budget as a way to make the cost of America's imperial military adventures seem smaller in comparison to the total cost of government). Meanwhile, the military share of the budget works out to about $1.6 trillion.
That figure includes the Pentagon budget request of $708 billion, plus an estimated $200 billion in supplemental funding, called "overseas contingency funding" in euphemistic White House-speak), to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, some $40 billion or more in "black box" intelligence agency funding, $94 billion in non-DOD military spending, $100 billion in veterans benefits and health care spending, and $400 billion in interest on debt raised to pay for prior wars and the standing military.
The 2011 military budget, by the way, is the largest in history, not just in actual dollars, but in inflation adjusted dollars, exceeding even the spending in World War II, when the nation was on an all-out military footing.
Military spending in all its myriad forms works out to represent 53.3% of total US federal spending.
It's also a budget that is rising at a faster pace than any other part of the budget (with the possible exception of bailing out crooked Wall Street financial firms and their managers). For the past decade, and continuing under the present administration, military budgets have been rising at a 9% annual clip, making health care inflation look tiny by comparison.
US military spending isn't just half of the US budget. It is also half of the entire global spending on war and weaponry. In 2009, according to the venerable War Resisters League, US military spending accounted for 47% of all money spent globally on war, weapons and military preparedness. What makes that staggering figure particularly ridiculous is that America's allies--countries like France, Britain, Germany, Italy, and Japan--account for another 21% of the world's military spending. Fully 12 of the top-spenders among big military-spending nations are either allies of the US, or are friendly countries like Brazil and India. That is to say, America and its friends and allies account for more than two-thirds of all military spending worldwide.
China, in contrast, probably the closest thing to a real "threat" to American interests because of America's treaty commitments to the island nation of Taiwan, and China's claim that it is a part of the PRC, spends only some $130 billion on its military, much of which is actually devoted to maintaining military control of the country's own 1.3 billion people, some of whom might prefer to be independent, or to be freer.
The next biggest military spender, Russia, spends less than $80 billion a year on its decrepit military, and isn't even technically an enemy of the US anymore. Its military is largely busy keeping restive regions from spinning off from the mother country, anyhow.
Meanwhile Iran, which the White House and Congress are portraying as America's arch enemy despite its not having invaded another country in hundreds of years, isn't even on the list of the top 17 military big-spenders. Iran's current military budget is a teensy $4.8 billion, about the same as the estimated $5 billion spent on the military by North Korea--America's other "major enemy." Each of those country's military budgets is about one-quarter of the military budget of Australia, or a third of the military budget of the Netherlands.
Just to give one an idea of how small $4.8 billion is in comparison to the $1.6 trillion that the US is spending each year on war and planning for war, that number is roughly what the Pentagon plans to spend over the next year on childcare and youth programs, morale and recreation programs and commissaries on its bases! It's about what the Pentagon will spend acquiring replacement Seahawk, Chinook and Blackhawk helicopters this year.
For the average American, what all this means is that of every dollar you send to the IRS, 53 cents will be going to pay for blowing stuff up, fattening the wallets of colonels admirals and generals, bloating the portfolios of investors in military industries, and of course funding the bonuses paid to executives of those companies, and the campaign chests and expense accounts of the members of Congress who vote for these outlandish budgets. Your money will also be going to pay for the salaries and the bullets of those brave heroes over in Afghanistan who are executing kids, killing pregnant women (and then digging out the bullets and claiming they were stabbed by their families), and for the anti-personnel weapons that are creating legions of legless Afghani kids.
Next time you hear that the government needs to cut funds for providing medical care to the children of laid-off workers, or that supplemental unemployment funds are running out, next time you hear that federal funds that are needed to fund extra teachers at your school are being cut, or that Social Security benefits need to be cut back, or the retirement age needs to be increased to 70, next time you hear that your local post office has to be shut down for lack of funds, next time you hear that Medicare benefits need to be reduced, think about that 53% of your tax payment that is going to finance the most enormous war machine the world has ever known.
And ask yourself: Is this really necessary? Is this really where I want my money going?
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




212 Comments so far
Show AllI would agree with you about the general definition of neocon trolls and I have seen a lot of them on most progressive and liberal forums. I have read the archives over the months and I think that he often gets misunderstood. He can be frustrating at times but not to the point that he is an outright neocon troll as he has admitted to where he agrees with us on a lot of things. In my earlier dialogue with Jake, I would have first interpreted his posts on Exxon to be those of a neocon troll defending them but when I got a little deeper into the issue past the money, he made his interpretations clearer. I was upset at his somewhat shallow response on the civilian loss and bloodshed but I have seen worse among people in this country who are ignorant about the plight of the civilians our army has inflicted on to them.
There is no doubt that the military has all the money at its disposal to plant some trolls on this site but I don't think that Jake Newton quite fits it. None of us here can actually be sure that he is or isn't a paid troll even if he does upset his with shallow remarks at times. For that matter, I would seriously doubt that the military profiteers are looking at most CD posters as threats to their status quo especially when you consider the fact that we're outnumbered compared to the partisan Democratic forums such as Daily Kos and Huffington Post.
"For that matter, I would seriously doubt that the military profiteers are looking at most CD posters as threats to their status quo"
Bingo. Thanks for your comments.
One thought that came to my mind when I wrote that was if most people here actually read from other supposedly progressive and liberal sites. I know some do as their names are familiar but I guess not everyone wants to. I was glad I could help you out. We may not agree on everything but knowledge comes from such healthy debates. Thank you as well for your input.
P.S.: My niece, JenniferB, told me a lot about you and she found your posts in the past interesting. I had a chance to see your conversations with her from the archives. I don't know what others thought of her unique way of conversing with you even as she was a Nader lover but she once told me "It doesn't matter if they hate me after that. I like variety and challenges."
Thanks a lot. Where is Jennifer these days? I remember her, she was fair.
You know, reasonable and intelligent and informed people can have honest disagreements about complex issues. I go in with that assumption then see what happens.
I've hardly posted in months except the last week or so. To busy at work, and it's about to get busier.
Jennifer took a long vacation for three months and finally got back late last month. She really wanted to visit Europe for a while and she finally took the chance plus she went to Russia and South Africa. She only posted a couple of days here in February but told me that she wanted to dedicate her time to knowing more about those foreign lands in person. She brought her long lost relatives over for a visit and I had a chance to get to meet them. I had a chance to go visit them too last week. She has changed somewhat but I think that she will continue to keep her fairness in thinking and looking at all sides before jumping to conclusions. She hasn't been in much of a mood to read or posts on the sites but I guess she has a lot to take care of first. Filing her taxes wasn't too hard for her but it seems that she has a lot of work to take care. She took a lot of unpaid leave she told me and I don't know what is going on over there but I am sure she'll take care of it. I don't know when she plans on coming back and posting but I am sure she will return. Hang in there. I hear you about those busy schedules too. We all get them when we least expect them. I will be taking a couple of weeks away from work myself and taking her overseas relatives she brought over for a brief visit to the US to a few states out in the heartland and the West. This could get interesting. Take care and good luck at work.
"Filing her taxes "
Taxes! Har, I am glad to see you take it full circle with this. I filed mime early, yesterday. :-) Sounds like she is doing fine. You take care of the both of you.
Thanks Jake. I live a distance away from her but we email and phone each other from time to time. She lives in the St Louis suburbs. I got her to confidently use tax preparation software a few years ago. E-filing on the federal level is free with the software but state returns cost extra so we got to do our paper work there. And to honor buying local, I purchase from H&R Block since I live in Kansas City, MO. :)
"All the neocon trolls are resentful when they're exposed."
You don't know what a "troll" is. I don't resent a thing. I'm still here with you. It sounds to me like *you* are the resentful one because I crushed your arguments. That's just a guess on my part. Hopefully you learned something in the discussion, I always do.
"spending with specious and dishonest comments. That's easily seen simply by inspecting his posts."
If it's so easy, why did you *fail* to demonstrate that yourself when I asked? Because you are wrong to begin with, and you know you can't do it. So instead you dance around it and try to talk about who or what you think I am so you can ignore what I said. This is a well known fallacy of logic called “Ad Hominem”. I suggest you study up on Critical Thinking. Start with Logical Fallacies. There are a number of good on line resources. If you spent just a half hour doing that, you would be so far ahead of where you are today. You'll be able to have better faith in your views and be able to support them better. You may even have to re think some of your positions. Everyone who is intellectually honest has to do this from time to time anyway. One day you will thank me for this tip.
"you think military profiteers can't afford trolls?"
How much do you think I get paid? How do you think the "military profiteers" came up with that figure vis a vis the value of the perceived benefits of my "services"? What I am asking here is called a "Business Case". Do you know what that is?
Democrats and Republicans agree on more war, more military spending, and less constitutional rights.
One reason I'm active in the Green Party is because it's the only national party that is serious about ending the wars and redirecting money wasted on weapons of war to programs of social uplift.
If you're serious about opposing the perpetual warfare state, get active with the Green Party today.
This is absolute proof that the war industry is OUT OF CONTROL. Death wiorship........ genocide, violence, maiming, bioweapons, sonic weapons, nuclear weapons, laser weaponry, HAARP, chemical weapons, mind control weapons, chemtrails, drugs as weapons, torture, bombs, drones, tanks, machine guns, grenades, landmines, bombers. These people are OUT OF CONTROL, everyone involved.
Do you guys even read the news?:
"The already sweet contracts Iraq scored from more than a dozen foreign oil firms just got a bit sweeter: instead of taking $700 million in loans from two consortia, it converted them to a $200 million signing bonus they get to keep.
Ten contracts signed with international oil companies since November give the operators between $1.15 and $6 for each additional barrel of oil produced, which is then assessed with a 35 percent tax and a 25 percent cut for the state oil partner."
Back in 1967, a group of us in San Francisco and Berkely protested against WAR TAX.
We did not support the genocide in Vietnam.
The thing about griingos is they have no historical memory.
I found creative ways to avoid paying taxes, then finally left Gringolandia for good in 1993.
I paid taxes in Mexico until I retired in 2006. Mexico, for all its faults--including its proximity to the US, has not made war against other countries.
Sometimes you just have to put your money where your mouth is--even if it means you earn less money.