Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Stop Being and Funding the Evil We Deplore
“Let us not become the evil we deplore”, warned Cong. Barbara Lee when she cast the lone vote against going to war in Afghanistan in September 2001. Well, it’s time to look in the mirror—and it’s not a pretty picture.
Just contemplate these two incidents, one that took place in Iraq in 2007 and has now gone viral on the internet, the other that took place in Gardaz, Afghanistan in February 2010.
Baghdad: U.S. aerial shooters chuckle as they let loose a torrent of bullets, killing over a dozen people, including two Reuters staff. Then they unleash another round on an Iraqi who—passing by in his van—tries to help the wounded. When the American soldiers discover they have hit two children in the van, they can be heard snorting, “It's their fault for bringing their kids into a battle.”
No one—from those who pulled the triggers to those who gave the okay—has been punished for the murder of these innocents. That’s because this blatant disregard for human life falls within the rules of engagement. And the only reason the incident came to light is thanks to Reuters for its persistence and to Wikileaks for procuring the footage and putting on their site.
Gardez, Afghanistan: US Special Operations forces surround a home where a party is taking place for the birth of a grandson. Two men come out to see why they are being surrounded. They are shot dead. The US soldiers later report they found three women inside the house, gagged and murdered by their own relatives.
The Times of London later reports that the women were killed by the American soldiers. Not only that. To hide the murder, the soldiers dug bullets out of the women’s bodies and washed the wounds with alcohol to hide the evidence. One of the women was a pregnant mother of 10; another was a pregnant mother of six; the third was a teenage girl.
No one has been punished in this incident either. General McChrystal was briefed on the case in March but said nothing about it. The murders only came to light because the Times reporter Jerome Starkey visited the family and talked to Afghan investigators.
While McChrystal issued a new directive in July 2009 restricting activities likely to result in civilian casualties and urged troops to act with greater sensitivity to Afghan cultural and religious concerns, the killing of innocents continues. According to the UN, at least 98 Afghan civilians were killed in night raids in 2009.
The same is true at checkpoints. In a rare moment of honesty, while addressing a virtual townhall with troops in Afghanistan, General McChrystal admitted, "We really ask a lot of our young service people out on the checkpoints because there's danger, they're asked to make very rapid decisions in often very unclear situations. However, to my knowledge, in the nine-plus months I've been here, not a single case where we have engaged in an escalation of force incident and hurt someone has it turned out that the vehicle had a suicide bomb or weapons in it and, in many cases, had families in it…We've shot an amazing number of people and killed a number and, to my knowledge, none has proven to have been a real threat to the force."
Our killing of civilians has spread to Pakistan, where the most deadly attacks come from unmanned drones. A report by the New America Foundation speculates that U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan have killed somewhere around 700 to 1,000 people, one-third of them civilians.
As Americans on conscience, we can’t stand by and allow these killings to continue. Here are some actions we should we be calling for:
- stop the air wars, including the deadly drone attacks in Afghanistan and Pakistan;
- stop the night raids that sow terror and abuse;
- hold the soldiers and higher ups accountable for their actions, including General McChrystal;
- pressure Congress to hold hearings on these atrocities;
- organize teach-ins that educate the public and help build the anti-war movement.
- Sign on to CODEPINK's open letter condemning the cover-ups and demanding accountability!
These are all critical actions to engage in. But there is really only one way to stop the collateral murder by our military: stop the wars and bring our troops home. The Obama administration is now asking Congress for another $33 billion of our tax dollars for war. Enough is enough. These are wars we can’t afford, we can’t win, and we can’t condone on moral grounds. Call your representatives—202-224-3121—
- Posted in


106 Comments so far
Show AllI hate to say this, but its just pointless at this time to expect Washington to listen, or more importantly, stop their behavior using the author's suggestions. Its just pointless.
The only way to get them to stop is to confront them directly and forcefully.
That's most likely not going to happen.
The killing & crime machine called Washington, D.C. just keeps rolling on.
I wish I didn't agree with you -- about contacting our elected representatives, Moonpie, but my experiences, here in NYC, don't reflect anything very positive. I attend as many rallies/protests/lectures/panel discussions as I can, but people are NOT showing up. The left seems MIA, regardless of the issue. Maybe, with the revelations of the latest atrocities, people will re-engage. I don't know.
First of all, the "Anybody But Bush" campaign for Kerrey in 2004 served to neutralize the anti-war/peace movements. And, it worked! Then, most organizations continued to capitulate after Obama won election in 2008. I even remember Code Pink stepping away from some of their original principles.
If people in this country still believe that U.S. troops are in Afghanistan to save the women of Afghanistan, think again! The February incident -- two pregnant women shot, with their hands tied behind their backs, and then, in order to cover up the debacle, the special forces use knives to dig out the bullets, drowning the knives and wounds in alcohol, to further disintegrate the evidence -- should clear up any misconceptions! Of course, other people were also murdered in the same incident. Those lives, certainly, are just as important!
Me three.
I don't begrudge those who are motivated by a need to keep trying, or dispute foregone conclusions like "one never knows unless one tries" or "better to at least keep kicking & screaming than let the bastards roll right over us!"
Still, it ought to be obvious by now that our Elected Misrepresentatives have turned every traditional means of ordinary citizens holding incumbents' cloven hooves to the fire into a well-oiled game of pattycake.
Public indignation may still influence, not to say counter-manipulate, sitting (more like squatting) politicians. But it is a far, far distant second to the one and only thing that matters: $$$.
It's vaguely reminiscent of that old cartoon or slapstick comedy shtick in which a small, runty man (or Olive Oyl) furiously rushes upon a Goliath-sized brute, whereupon the brute calmly reaches out and holds the shrimpy berserker's head at arm's length-- leaving the Goliath's body well out of reach of his puny adversary's windmilling fists.
Money talks, principles walk.
"Money talks, principles walk." -- Obedient Servant
To use an old cliche, it's sad but true!
I can see Olive Oyl!
Obedient servant: We both know a writer who used to post regularly on CD articles and with whom you had a number of exchanges. This person has written articles in his weblog on the aftermath of the Citzens v. F.E.C. debacle which seemingly enshrined money even higher in the pantheon of power in U.S. elections; but the person argues perversely that it is not only essential but also possible, to take "the politicians out of the money" if not to "take the money out of politics" by a deliberate program of "progressive populist" candidates for public office with severely restricted budgets of campaign contributions and expenditures, making their very modesty of spending a virtue to be converted into votes over the public's very revulsion at that "money power." This person hasn't been content to assert this as a principle of political campaigning; he is in process of creating Campaign Corner, a directory of candidates from the Green Party, and among independents and adherents of other progressive third parties, not simply to run to campaign "smartly" and show the whole political world that this country is NOT at the mercy of the plutocrats.
So pick up that phone and call the attendant at a congressional office if you will, but note that your effort will probably be ineffectual. But please look at the material linked below and give some thought whether it might indeed be "smarter" to join other political candidates dedicated to recovering democracy from the clutches of the money-bags.
The articles: http://sunstateactivist.org/ssablog/?p=439
http://sunstateactivist.org/ssablog/?p=455
Campaign Corner: http://sunstateactivist.org/campaigncorner/
Obedient Servant
May I quote your sentence that ends in "pattycake," with attribution, of course? It's the best one I've read by a modern writer in a long, long time.
PeaceTruthBeauty!
Jack Chase
Mais oui!
Flattery will get you everywhere. Thanks for the compliment.
And PeaceTruthBeauty yourself!
You're welcome, and thank you. Into the journal it goes.
Keep feeling, thinking, writing.
Peace,
Jack Chase
Yes, but remember when Randle McMurphy tried to pick up the thingamajig in "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest"- and failed- but he TRIED. And though he failed, and ended up with a lobotomy, later on the Big Chief guy DID pick the damn thing up and throw it through the window and escape.
So all I can do is TRY, even if I bust my heart trying, and one of these days SOMEONE will succeed where I fail. But only if I try now.
That's how I look at it, anyway.
Good stuff.
Yes. Call a phone attendant in Washington. Tell them 'no more money for war'
That has to be the most gormless thing I've read so far today.
Money talks and bullshizzle walks in the corporofascist paradise.
All of this reminds me of that scene in Monty Python's Meaning of Life where the soldier is saying after one of their colonial battles in Africa:
"Better than staying at home, eh sir! At home if you kill someone they arrest you. Here they give you a gun, and show you what to do, sir. I mean, I killed fifteen of those buggers sir! Now at home they'd hang me. HERE they give me a fucking medal sir!"
Dark, dark humor... sometimes its either laugh or cry. Tell them 'no more money for war.'
I'm with you fellow anarchist.
Can you describe how you can just "not pay?" What happens to the automatic witholding, if you earn wage income? You never even see it, it is already gone...
You can learn about resisting the war tax by going to www.warresisters.org and/or http://www.nwtrcc.org/what_is_wtr.htm. They kindly provide taxpayers with percentages of the budget spent on various DOD requests and taxpayers can subtract that percentage from their tax payment (be sure to include a note) for the year to which it applies.If you are not ready to take the IRS head-on yet, pay your taxes with a note attached to check and/or return saying "paid under protest". I agree that if we do not refuse to pay the portion of our taxes designated for illegal war activities, we are complicit in actions such as the recently revealed atrocities committed by our soldiers in Baghdad. Listen hard to your conscience.
Sounds so similar to the reality in Iraq and Afghanistan- or new Orleans in 2005.
Thanks Medea, for all the work and some laughs too.
persistence with humor is the greatest
"Call your representatives—202-224-3121—and tell them..."
Now there's a truly radical idea, call 'em up on the phone!
Well, so much for (land of the free and home of the brave). These ideas, the ones to stop or curtail the war, have been tried often and by many. The thing is they won't listen. Thier MO will not change. Though they are supposed to serve us, thier pockets are lined by other means. I am really discouraged. Hope someone comes with a good and viable idea. To peace in our time!
Somebody remember to call Kucinich, so he can be the last Democrat to go for a ride on "Air Force One" before voting for more war money!!!!
Sadly, too true.
Okay, here's a good and viable idea.
We MUST launch a NEW PROGRESSIVE POLITICAL PARTY IN THE UNITED STATES.
The Democratic and Republican parties are now owned by corporate America and they do NOT care about the average American citizen.
By now this should be abundantly clear to all of us at Commondreams, at Huffington, at Crooksandliars, at Salon, at Antiwar.com and on and on.
Medea Benjamin, Cindy Sheehan and millions of other progressive Democrats realize that there is not ONE SINGLE DEMOCRAT WHO CAN BE TRUSTED ANY LONGER.
Not even the adorable Dennis Kucinich. We cannot trust Bernie Sanders.
Any person now serving in Congress "goes along to get along" with AIPAC, with the DNC, the DLC, the DCCC, the big healthcare insurance corporations, big pharma, big hospitals. With anyone who will write them a BIG CHECK for their next campaign.
Time is short. The American public who still bother to vote are all being hypnotized by the teevee and the MSM propaganda. All they know is, "BUY THIS NEW THINGAMABOB!!! IT'S THE LATEST AND GREATEST!"
Okay. So let's give them what they want. We all talk to our neighbors and folks in line at the store and post office and at coffee shops. People know that something is VERY wrong in D.C.
We need to give them a NEW party that has a platform of COMMON SENSE VALUES and that is FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE AND SOCIALLY PROGRESSIVE. The party needs to be BRANDED AND MARKETED LIKE A SHINY NEW FORD HYBRID.
This is completely doable. We can have a new party in place by the 2012 elections and with candidates running for every open seat in the country from dog catcher to president all with the same platform.
No more "going along to get along" with lies, war, corruption, war crimes, torture, environmental degradation and healthcare schemes that rob the taxpayers and force us to deal with for-profit insurance corporations.
There is only ONE WAY for us to change this country for the better and that is to DIVORCE OURSELVES COMPLETELY FROM THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS.
And the only way is with a NEW party. "New, fresh, exciting, clean and really American through and through and that is based on the Constitution."
I am ready to work on this 24/7.
What about you Medea? Have you had enough groveling to the Democrats who just ignore you and kick you in the teeth?
Why not start the new party with an outreach from Code Pink? Meetings called all over the country on the same day to organize a platform. We could easily raise the seed money for the website and to launch the party with full page newspaper ads. From there we would raise plenty of money on the website with "money bombs".
There WILL be a new party launched in this country SOME DAY. WHY NOT NOW?
Totally agree- taking energy born of compassion, frustration, and anguish into a positive compassionate direction....and necessary caz the two war/ corporate parties WILL NOT change !
tioche, Mexico....gotta be a World movement 1
There are not enough progressives/independents/current-minor-party-members (call them all "independents" for purposes below) willing to form a new party to challenge the republicans or democrats--- it's just not going to happen. But independents have the numbers to swing elections to either democrats or republicans very effectively. I think a more effective strategy is to aim to get rid of almost all high seniority congressmen(and presidents) of both parties; they and the president determine which issues even get brought up in committees. How to do that----most of these people are in safely gerrymandered districts. Strategy: get most independent voters to vote against the incumbent--REGARDLESS OF PARTY OR VIEWS! Do not try to vote "Lesser-Evil". History shows that strategy is ineffective on the bigger fundamental issues. After a few 2-year election cycles (maybe 6-10 years) most of those highly indebted (to lobby groups) will be history. Then (hopefully) new candidates will realize that being beholden to moneyed contributors will get them the "loyal" base party voters ,but not the determining independent vote. THEN, independents need to dictate their key platform agenda to new Democrat candidates.This is probably the hardest part, since some entity would need to express the overall agenda and announce which candidates should be supported.This is not a "party" since the candidates would be either independent,or more effectively democratic or republican.Probably some on-line new entity that collects votes of independents on agenda and announces the most effective independent vote.Then it becomes a matter of whether independents have the trust and cohesiveness to overcome pet-issues that do not make the cut to make the decisive cohesive independent minority vote.In other words, does humanity have the stuff to make democracy work for the common interest?DOn't know---yet to be determined.) (After eliminating the current office-holders of both major parties, forget the "new" candidate Republican idealogus who would rather go down with the ship than change their myopic idealogies). If the newly elected democrats fail to follow through when elected, swift re-implementation of the anti-incumbent strategy will shortly emphasize the point. If most independents would hang together on the main strategy despite some differences, this strategy over time would leverage the minority independents as the controlling election group.The obvious downside is that for a few cycles we would give anti-progressives maybe more contriol---but heck that is likely to happen even with the lesser evil strategy cycles.There is no silver bullet to change our plutocratic oligarchy, but this is the only one I know of that could likely succeed,IFF enough independents would buy in and adopt it.Perhaps even some of the current small ineffective independent parties (some of which would not buy into the overall independent agenda) would buy into the strategy upon realization it would give them their best chance on their own when the powerful incumbents are eliminated.
Things seem to have changed a bit.
Maybe lots of folks are thinkin, "This is a good time to get ready for War".
What will the left do during Armageddon?
I know what my congress people feel about what I want so I will save the wasted energy on another disappointment....
Do you want to hit the streets again, Really?
If so why don't you do it?
Because nobody but the usual suspects, my friends, show up?
"There has got to be a better way", I'll bet your thinkin/
Does the left itch to compete with the anger of the right wing militias looking for them Socialists out there taking away their jobs and freedoms?
We may have to have peace here before we can have peace over there.
Things seem to have changed a bit in America.
Even if we didn't pay our taxes, Washington could always borrow from China. I know there's no easy way out of this war machine but being that this nation is such a totally lost soul, I don't know what to say feeling that nothing we do puts a dent on anything other than to just leave the war machine stranded. I guess that like the energy issue, we're going to need multiple ideas and plans on ending the war machine.
So we want to do something, but for heaven's sake, let's make sure it is legal. No wonder we Americans are so ineffectual in effecting change. Even civil disobedience is illegal-- those who participate get fined, spend a few months in the slammer, or both. If you want change, you need to take risks and endure the consequences. Otherwise, count on enduring the SOS.
Funny, but true.
Well...Marshall Rosenberg tells a couple of stories about his visits and work in prisons. In one he leads and inmate through a process where he discovers that the person he murdered was only the stimulus of the angry rage that helped purpetrate the act and not the cause. After a 3 hour pause in their conversation the inmate comes back to Rosenberg and says, "I wish I would have known this earlier"..."why?"..."because then I wouldn't of had to kill my best friend".
The other story involves an inmate (a beater and raper of children) where Marshall helped him come to the basis of his actions, like all of ours, fulfilling our "needs". As Rosenberg helped the inmate review his atrocious acts to uncover his need...it was, "to gain the longing of affection that I saw in my father's eyes when he did the same thing me". Yes, affection is a need that every human requires for full happiness, and a thorough understanding of this is key for opening the locks that hold back the tide of a new phase of peace.
The new Ben Stiller movie Greenberg has a line in it, "hurt people, hurt people". Do you take this as a chant to "hurt people", or something else? So as Ty says, "We have to look deeply, we can't just condemn". Have we done acts of evil? Obviously. Do we have to do them, continue doing them, do we like doing them?...If we look deeply...I don't think so.
As an educator that has been involved in fighting the relocation of our school from a college campus to a school directly across from a juvenile detention center I can truly tell you all that the frustration is overwhelming. My students wrote letters to elected politicians, visited their elected representatives, protested and even attended all the meetings that these panels held to simply hear the inevitable and lose. However, they learned a valuable lesson that you fight and if you lose you fight again eventually you will get a win but giving up is not an option. Common dreamers cant give up and this defeatist attitude can not prevail eventually they must listen and when they do we would have lost so many battles that we will demand the unthinkable and get it because we will have no fear of losing a battle. We must organize and mobilize it is our moral and ethical duty and lets do it from where ever we are.
WITCH
A-hah!
(laughs)
So! You won't take warning, eh? All the
worse for you, then. I'll take care of you
now instead of later! Hah! When I gain
those ruby slippers, my power will be the
greatest in Oz! And now, my beauties!
Something with poison in it, I think. With
poison in it, but attractive to the eye --
and soothing to the smell!
(laughs)
Poppies! Poppies! Poppies!
Congresswoman Barbara Lee cast her lone dissenting vote in 2001 in opposition to the AUMF - Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists. She's been quoted as saying it was not a vote against the use of military powers but that it was in protestation of the way the bill had been drawn up, giving overly-broad powers to the President to declare war on anyone involved in the 9/11 attacks anywhere at any time without the due process of evaluation of evidence. The AUMF as it stands written is basically a green light for the use of force by Presidential decree against any deemed terrorist threat against the U.S. In other words, it effectively parlays the whole issue of a response to the 9/11 attacks into a global campaign against terror through the use of military force without time limits. It's also framed in such a way that any objections to the use of such broad executive powers can be portrayed as endangering the country's national security capabilities.
"No one has been punished in this incident either."
Of course I want the atrocious forms of death to stop and be transformed into another means of passing, but what should the punishment be? And before the call for punishment is made, is there another form of confrontation that would better serve hamanity? I mean: isn't the call to punishment, that president George W. Bush issued from his bull horn from the rubble of the Twin Towers, still the main energizing form that the US operates under today? Isn't that the form which transformed "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" into the billboards I see stating "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of those who threaten it"?
There are laws against murder and punishments accorded to that act by law. Why not invoke them when dealing with murderers?
Yes, I agree with enacting a societies laws against someone who murders. But to call for punishment right now instead of using the breakthrough (from the vise grip that vice president Cheney placed on the media) in the technology and dignity and diligence true journalists are providing humanity to look fuller at what our collective behavior is condoning...isn't that the energy to coalesce right now? Certainly "punishment", some sort of reconciliation should come, and when it does, what should it be for someone who murders, or issues orders to murder, in a war, a war perpetrated by a sick society as evidenced by the skyrocketing use of prescription drugs of the last few years that are currently being reported?
It seems that Only Anarchy ca gets it. The taxpayers are complicit in these crimes. Blog away, call the venal politicians, march in the streets, sign another petition, then remember that if you give them tax money you have financed murder. Go ahead, render your best excuses. Find a way to justify your lack of morality and/or cowardice.
Buck,
OK, I'll give it my best excuse. Considering that I have no option about paying income taxes if I want to be employed as a public school teacher, and since I have my last child to have to get through high school and further, and that I have to eat, sleep, etc. . . preferably in a secure and dry location, I cannot not pay my taxes. If there was a way I would not pay the portion that goes to the death and destruction that America rains upon the world. I do have an obligation to my children for now and afterwards I will do what I can.
And no it is not a lack of morality nor cowardice.
OYE
But there is a way, many ways in fact. One is even legal.
Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rummy and the rest of that rotten lot should be indicted for murder. Obama and his gang should also be hauled in for murder charges too. These people are war criminals.
Yes.
Americans cannot seem to get their minds around the idea that our government has been taken over by one of the the worst organized crime syndicates in modern history. I guess we get fooled by the nice suits and don't realize that they are just mostly thugs in office. Soldiers and capos, like that.
Medea Benjamin: "The Obama administration is now asking Congress for another $33 billion of our tax dollars for war. Enough is enough. These are wars we can’t afford, we can’t win, and we can’t condone on moral grounds."
Of course Benjamin is correct in her opinions about Amerikkka's wars, but she just doesn't understand that Amerikkka's fascist business interests are reaping vast profits as a result of these policies. And after all, profit is the sole criterion that drives the ruling elite.
Last I heard, 53 percent of the American public approve of Mr. Obamageddon's handling of the War in Pakistan.
Now what?
Wait for the new polls on Afghanistan and Iraq.
Yes, by all means call your bought-and-paid-for misrepresentatives, and receive back boilerplate form letters thanking you for your concern while said misrep. continues funding the wars his party (Dem or Repug) knows is the Right War. I have a short stack of such replies from my worthless representative for a host of issues over the past several years. He never does a single thing I want him to, and like any good Democrat, he doesn't give a shit what I think about it. Asking these assholes to stop the war is like asking Donald Trump to give all his money to the Haitians and go to work for Greenpeace.
You lie ! You didnt contact your representative. I contact mine once every two weeks and I get nice replies and some disappointments. Now be nice, calm down, and write a good letter to your representative. You don't need college education to do that dude. DOH !
I don't lie, you offensive oaf. Go straight to hell with your Democratic love fest. You may as well, since you deride college education or anything at all that smacks of actually understanding these issues.
Oh yeah, your pointless letter writing has really touched their hearts and minds. Ah, nevermind. They don't even care what you think! Thanks why they have their staff write you phony, pre-planned responses to morons like you, who want to believe that the Dems care and have morals.
Children, children, stop your bickering.
I have many of those shortstacks from forty years.
The 110th congress was the most written and phone called
congress in history.
I faxed 50 a day for two years until AT&T finally shut me down.
We are way past where a write in campaign is anymore
than supplying Capitol Hill toilet paper.
I am sure the previous poster was tongue in cheek, I am new
here. Keith and the girl are not news reporters but
apologists for the Dems
I get form letters with invitations to drop on by for milk and cookies.
When I receive requests for money, I start my reply with "Bite me", then explain my disgust.