Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
American Incredibility and Israel
Considering the Obama administration's ever wobblier attempt to impose "crippling sanctions" on Iran, the New York Times' David Sanger recently wrote, "The delays and the potential for a substantially watered-down resolution, Mr. Obama's allies say, have put the administration's credibility on the line in one of its biggest foreign policy challenges."
Credibility. Washington policymakers have been in search of it, have even fought wars in its name, for half a century now. In the Vietnam era, realizing that our victory weapons, nuclear bombs, were essentially too powerful to use, American strategic thinkers sought others ways to project, if not power commensurate with our arsenal, then an image of power commensurate with it -- "an image of vast national strength and of unwavering determination to use that strength in world affairs," as Jonathan Schell explained in his remarkable book from that era, Time of Illusion. Unfortunately, when you put your faith in "credibility," you also offer power to others in whose eyes you must, of course, be credible.
By that standard, in the age of Obama, the United States has reached a curious moment of rising incredibility on the global stage. Indeed, nothing illustrated this onrushing state more vividly than the whack the Israelis recently gave Vice President Joe Biden -- and so the global image of American power. While Biden was in Israel paying homage to that country and trying to jumpstart the "peace process," Israel announced a new building program in East Jerusalem. The news wasn't in itself particularly startling -- such building in occupied lands, after all, has been a non-stop reality of Israeli policy for years. New was the stunning timing of the announcement, the way the leadership of a country remarkably dependent on American power and money evidently had no hesitation in administering a humiliating credibility-drubbing to Mr. Number Two.
Most observers have discussed this startling act largely in terms of the Middle East, but it was no less striking if you were sitting in Beijing, wondering how exactly to deal with U.S. complaints about the value of the yuan, or in Moscow, where Russian leaders, during a visit by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton the following week, duplicated the Israelis' act. They announced that they, too, were about to do a little more building; they were going to have Iran's first nuclear power plant at Bushehr up and running this summer, another credibility-drubbing that was more striking for its timing than its substance. Nor were they alone. As Jay Solomon and Peter Spiegel of the Wall Street Journal point out, there has been "a string of public rebukes of U.S. foreign policy in recent weeks," including by Brazilian President Lula da Silva, who spoke out against Iranian sanctions (also during a Clinton visit), and Syrian president Bashar Assad, who appeared with Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the head of Hezbollah, "defying U.S. calls to loosen ties with Tehran and the militants." The Israelis, the Iranians, the Russians, the Chinese... when the Europeans start to say "no," and make announcements meant to sting while American officials are visiting, you'll know that we're in a new world.
In the meantime, consider Prime Minister Netanyahu's slap (and his reiteration of Israeli building policy in his speech at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee convention yesterday) a measure of a Washington with two draining wars and a host of domestic problems that finds itself increasingly incapable of projecting an image of "credibility" abroad. Fifty years ago, with the invention of what Schell called "the doctrine of credibility," the U.S. superpower actually gave others the power to judge. Now, the judgments are beginning to roll in. As TomDispatch regular Tony Karon, who runs the provocative Rootless Cosmopolitan website, makes clear, at least when it comes to Israel, more imagery, no matter how credible, or even more angry words alone, won't help to change that.
- Posted in


19 Comments so far
Show AllWhen will our "leaders" realize that it is unAmerican of them to attend AIPAC conferences while the Israeli occupation is harming our soldiers overseas?!!
Money > patriotism
How is it harming our soldiers overseas? I don't see that.
I see Israel's occupation of West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem is harming both Palestinians (the occupyee) and Israel
(the Occupier) alike.
Humam Khalil al-Balawi, the Jordanian suicide bomber who killed seven CIA agents in Afghanistan recently, is just one example. Israel's brutal assault on Gaza in 2008-9 was his primary motivation, according to his brother.
Have you not read about General Petreaus's comments to the President about Israel's actions and how they put his troops in even greater danger?
Hey look, Archie1954.
If Obama would get our troops the hell out of Afghanistan and Iraq and Pakistan, they wouldn't be in danger. One doesn't have to justify Israel's actions to understand that.
Who will bell the AIPAC cat, i.e., start a formal investigation into their lobbying and their role in "vetting" candidates based on their support for Israeli policies and actions?
Who got congress to condemn the Goldstone report?
Credibilty? What creditility? Here's what a former Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, Paul Craig Roberts, has to say about it in his most recent article ( http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts03242010.html ):
"Truth has fallen and taken liberty with it. [...] Today Americans are ruled by propaganda. Americans have little regard for truth, little access to it, and little ability to recognize it."
It's difficult to convince other nations of your credibility when there is none at home. Foreign audiences, even under threat, aren't quite as gullible as the domestic herd, despite USA Incorporated's best efforts to "globalize" its propaganda machine and American "cultural" excrement.
If you could just export your "educational" system, you might have a chance.
If anyone wants a good read on "American Exceptionalism" or just out and out hubris read this authors piece in todays HuffPost.I have not seen better outside of a book.Tony
Credibility is relative: different acts may establish credibility depending on what you want people to believe.
The US government wishes to be credibly violent and to credibly back its goons, not to be credibly honest.
Aid to Israel satisfies both criteria.
A little waltz to play "honest broker" for the citizens at home, and another 3bn to tanks and planes.
I think that the only "credible" opinion on this whole tragic situation is the one implicit in Michael Moore's question when he recently asked, on a CNN interview (relating to the Health Care Bill, but it applies as well to America's Foreign Policy) "Why is it that, when the Republicans have a cause to defend, everyone not only expects them to come onstage with their guns blazing, while when we Democrats have a cause to defend, we impose on ourselves the discipline of calm reasoning, and that stance of composure in the face of the most barbaric verbal and physical aggression on the part of our opponents is EXPECTED of us?"
President Obama quite likely means well. But, he is not "pragmatic" enough, not ready to return "blazing gunfire" against the really bad guys, including Benjamin Netanyahu and the warmongering, hate-spewing, greedy/predatory hawks everywhere. In the circumstances, a third intifaada may very soon be the only option left in the Middle East, while in Iran a recoil to hardline conservatism and paranoia that not only wipes out the gains towards liberalism that the Mousavi/Khatami reformist camp has so painfully accumulated over long years of struggle, but strengthens a feeling that, since America recognises as the only legitimate empowerment to dialogue the threat of mutual annihilation that nuclear weapons represent, Iran has no choice but to actually cross the rubicon and make the decision to seek to acquire such weapons. That would be the ultimate tragedy of what, in the 1970's, Lester Thurow called America's "zero-sum society" mentality.
"President Obama quite likely means well."
I see this qualifier on too many articles and comments to think it doesn't "mean" anything.
What exactly makes you believe that Obama "means well?" Did you say the same for Bush? Obama is in lock step with a very similar agenda.
Obama is a great gift to the brutal, dying American empire. If McCain was president and following Bush's footsteps, we'd see progressives in the streets by the hundreds of thousands.
In light of the Israeli's recent conduct, it's about time that we threaten, or actually, impose sabctions on Israel - - they've been asking for it with all of their sabre-rattling and the way they thumb their collective noses at our attempts to bring a decent resolution to a peace process in the Middle East that never quite seems to gety off the ground.
.
Neither the author, Mr. Engelhardt, nor P.M. Netanyahu, have yet realized, that a major shift in U.S. Foreign has already occured. The Obama Administration has distanced itself from its relient and weak dependent relations with the other nations of the world.
It has effected a disentanglement from the Jewish State of Israel. Henceforth, it will demonstrate its independance.
The newspeople will write many columns. They may cite the recent "slap/insult" to Vice President Biden as the pivotal point.,,,,WRONG,,,,,,,,Obama and Clinton have been planning and slowly inplementing these realignments over the last year.
The United States is not going to be manipulated by the Zionist Leaders of the State of Israel. Time will reveal all.
Netanyahu, Lieberman, and their gang of Fascists; are now dealing with a stronger and smarter U.S. Administration.
/
What proof do you have that Obama and co. won't continue to be lapdogs to our ally in the Mid East?
Looks like the dissolution of the settler-state Israel is just around the corner, what with the bombshell dropped by the likes of General David Petreaus, VP Joe Biden and Sec. of State Hillary Clinton to the effect that Israel's intransigence vis a vis a peace accord with the Palestinians not only is why they hate us, it's costing the lives of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan. A revelation that has the potential of putting the so-called special relationship between the U.S. and Israel at risk. Especially with the Israeli PM essentially giving America the middle finger with his statement last week that while Israel and the U.S. have mutual interests, when it comes to Israel's land-grabbing in East Jerusalem, bug-off, America, it's none of your damn business. Except it is our business cause it's costing American lives. Which means that here in the homeland the actions of the settler-state (better, its very existence) poses a national security risk. Zionists, of course, are aware that the situation is precarious for Israel and for its supporters. Not enough though to back off with this land grab. Indeed, yesterday the Israeli government gave the go-ahead to another building project in Arab East Jerusalem. Apparently they believe they can weather the storm, and well they may, unless those of us who seek a just and peacefull resolution of the Mideast conflict see to it that the settler-state's complicity in the martyrdom of our soldiers remains foremost in the minds of the American people. How? By holding daily rallies and vigils at Federal buildings and at the district offices of all the members of Congress, with ralliers chanting slogans such as, "Hey, hey, B.H.O., because of blowback from your unconditional support for Israel, how many Americans died in Afghanistan today?" How long will it take for these protests to force the Obama administration to rethink its approach to the Mideast conflict? A couple months. Less time provided there's a significant Jewish-American presence, because that'll encourage those who are angry as hell at what Israel's doing to come out, people who otherwise might not from fear of being called an anti-Semite or self-hating Jew, charges which will be rendered ridiculous and ineffective by the participation of so many Jewish participants at these rallies. What'll be the underlying purpose of these rallies? Persuading our government to downgrade the so-called special relationship between the U.S. and Israel, such that, the settler-state will be on its own, thereby forcing it to the negotiating table, where Jewish occupier and occupied Palestinian can work things out on the basis of one equals one with liberty and justice for all. And then, presto, no longer will "they hate us", which will reduce the number of caualties (theirs and ours) in Afghanistan, thereby giving peace a chance, after which, by popular demand, our troops come home, demilitarization set in, and we're en route to peace on earth and goodwill to all living beings. And history will record that the undoing of the special relationship between the U.S. of A. and its client state Israel was the key.
Ariel Sharon: "A lie should be tried in a place where it attracts the attention of the world."
Did any of you see [R] Minority Whip Eric Cantor's speech after a bullet was fired through the window of his Virginia office yesterday? The speech was all about how Democrats are politicizing the Tea-Bagger violence (as if he wasn't trying to co-opt the issue of political violence for himself). Poor benighted Republicans. They are clearly the victims here. And he's sooo young and good looking, too. Perfect hair and, oh, those muscles. Made me want to bust out crying for them and beleaguered, voiceless corporate America whose only protection is their cronies on the Supreme Court and dominating both Parties in Congress. Cantor is AIPAC's "Israel can inflict wanton cruelty on anyone it fucking wants" golden boy in the GOP.
The timing of the bullet with respect to recent events; the fact that it was fired from such a sheer downward angle that it could not possibly hit anyone inside the empty office and landed almost straight below the blinds, the nature of the speech, and the person chosen to deliver that speech are all just a little too perfect, my gut instinct tells me. Don't be surprised to see Cantor running for president or vice president in 2012, or that this may have been the beginning of his campaign.
All the theatrics of US-Israeli tensions is rubbish. A little drama for the masses.
Nothing has changed. Three quarters of Congress are Zionists, Clinton, Biden, and Rahm are Zioinists. And Obama has no convictions or principles on anything.
He gets on his knees for Israeli so they don't take him down for 2012 and they will if he doesn't obey. They've taken everyone down for the last forty years who doesn't cooperate. Jewish media ownership has been essential in destroying the some of the best possible public servants for America, by running them out of town through false accusations.
And why do you think Liberals are so reviled by the establishment? Liberals are the only remaining people who openly criticize Israel.
Our three branches of government serves the people of Israel first and foremost.
Everyone else, especially the American people can drop dead.
Nobody else matters.
Excellent comment! You pretty much summed up everything quite correctly.