EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Health Care Hindenburg Has Landed
Rep. Dennis Kucinich's decision to vote "yes" in Sunday's House action on the health care bill, although he had sworn to oppose the legislation unless there was a public option, is a perfect example of why I would never be a politician. I respect Kucinich. As politicians go, he is about as good as they get, but he is still a politician. He has to run for office. He has to raise money. He has to placate the Democratic machine or risk retaliation and defeat. And so he signed on to a bill that will do nothing to ameliorate the suffering of many Americans, will force tens of millions of people to fork over a lot of money for a defective product and, in the end, will add to the ranks of our uninsured.
The claims made by the proponents of the bill are the usual deceptive corporate advertising. The bill will not expand coverage to 30 million uninsured, especially since government subsidies will not take effect until 2014. Families who cannot pay the high premiums, deductibles and co-payments, estimated to be between 15 and 18 percent of most family incomes, will have to default, increasing the number of uninsured. Insurance companies can unilaterally raise prices without ceilings or caps and monopolize local markets to shut out competitors. The $1.055 trillion spent over the next decade will add new layers of bureaucratic red tape to what is an unmanageable and ultimately unsustainable system.
The mendacity of the Democratic leadership in the face of this reality is staggering. Howard Dean, who is a doctor, said recently: "This is a vote about one thing: Are you for the insurance companies or are you for the American people?" Here is a man who once championed the public option and now has sold his soul. What is the point in supporting him or any of the other Democrats? How much more craven can they get?
Take a look at the health care debacle in Massachusetts, a model for what we will get nationwide. One in six people there who have the mandated insurance say they cannot afford care, and tens of thousands of people have been evicted from the state program because of budget cuts. The 45,000 Americans who die each year because they cannot afford coverage will not be saved under the federal legislation. Half of all personal bankruptcies will still be caused by an inability to pay astronomical medical bills. The only good news is that health care stocks and bonuses for the heads of these corporations are shooting upward. Chalk this up as yet another victory for our feudal overlords and a defeat for the serfs.
The U.S. spends twice as much as other industrialized nations on health care-$7,129 per capita-although 45.7 million Americans remain without health coverage and millions more are inadequately covered, meaning that if they get seriously ill they are not covered. Fourteen thousand Americans a day are now losing their health coverage. A report in the journal Health Affairs estimates that, if the system is left unchanged, one of every five dollars spent by Americans in 2017 will go to health coverage. Private insurance bureaucracy and paperwork consume 31 cents of every health care dollar. Streamlining payment through a single nonprofit payer would save more than $400 billion per year, enough, Physicians for a National Health Plan points out, to provide comprehensive, high-quality coverage for all Americans. Check out www.healthcare-now.org. It has some of the best analysis.
This bill is not about fiscal responsibility or the common good. The bill is about increasing corporate profit at taxpayer expense. It is the health care industry's version of the Wall Street bailout. It lavishes hundreds of billions in government subsidies on insurance and drug companies. The some 3,000 health care lobbyists in Washington, whose dirty little hands are all over the bill, have once more betrayed the American people for money. The bill is another example of why change will never come from within the Democratic Party. The party is owned and managed by corporations. The five largest private health insurers and their trade group, America's Health Insurance Plans, spent more than $6 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2009. Pfizer, the world's biggest drug maker, spent more than $9 million during the last quarter of 2008 and the first three months of 2009. The Washington Post reported that up to 30 members of Congress from both parties who hold key committee memberships have major investments in health care companies totaling between $11 million and $27 million. President Barack Obama's director of health care policy, who will not discuss single payer as an option, has served on the boards of several health care corporations. And as salaries for most Americans have stagnated or declined during the past decade, health insurance profits have risen by 480 percent.
Obama and the congressional leadership have consciously shut out advocates of single payer from the debate. The press, including papers such as The New York Times, treats single payer as a fringe movement. The television networks rarely mention it. And yet between 45 and 60 percent of doctors favor single payer. Between 40 and 62 percent of the American people, including 80 percent of registered Democrats, want universal, single-payer not-for-profit health care for all Americans. The ability of the corporations to discredit and silence voices that represent at least half of the population is another sad testament to the power of our corporate state to frame all discussions.
Change will come only by building movements that stand in fierce and uncompromising opposition to the Democrats and the Republicans. If they can herd Kucinich and John Conyers, the sponsors of House Resolution 676, a bill that would create a publicly funded National Health Program by eliminating private health insurers, onto the House floor to vote for this corporate theft, what is the point in pretending there is any room left for us in the party? And why should we waste our time with gutless liberal groups such as Moveon.org, which felt the need to collect more than $1 million to pressure House Democrats who had voted "no" on the original bill to recant? What was this purportedly anti-war group doing anyway serving as an obsequious recruiting arm of the Obama election campaign? The longer we tie ourselves to the Democrats and these bankrupt liberal organizations the more ridiculous and impotent we appear.
"I'm ready to listen to the White House, if the White House is ready to listen to the concerns about putting a public option in this bill," the old Kucinich said on the "Democracy Now!" radio and television program before he flipped. "I mean, they can do that. You know, they're still cutting last-minute deals. Put the public option back in. Make it a robust public option. Give the people a chance to really negotiate rates with the insurance companies ... from the standpoint of having a public option. But don't just tell the people that you're going to call this health care reform, when you're giving insurance companies an even more powerful monopoly status in our economy."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


370 Comments so far
Show AllIt is amazing that liberals are so easily conned into supporting this garbage and calling it reform. I honestly think they are as dumb as the real wing nuts on the republican side.
Yes, it's incredible. What happened to these people? Do they believe everything they hear, like robots without question? Do they have the capacity to think things through? Are they suffering the same brain drain as the Tea Baggers?
It's truly shocking and disturbing.
It gags me to say this but Rahm caled it. They're f__king retards.
All politicians and beltway establishment types have absolutely ZERO incentive to ever take them seriously, now. They slit their own throats for good this time.
Played them like a fiddle by the smug Obama Monarchy.
Obama is honing in on generations of every middle class penny to be taken from them and handed over to the insatiable rich. Fat chance of this happening, but Obama should be run out of town before there's absolutely nothing left of us.
US "Liberals" complained for 8 years about how so many of Dubya's supporters didn't let the facts get in the way of good stories and their faith in da man.
Since the 2008 election many of the same self styled liberals have not let the facts get in the way of good stories and their faith in Obama.
Spot On...
"D"
"They slit their own throats for good this time."
All the way to the bank.
Chomsky once said you won't understand them (the economic elite) until you understand they want to take everything from you and leave you with nothing. Thanks for paying attention everyone posting on this article and Chris hedges especially, the Obamabots on some of the other items here were starting to depress me.
The cheering Democrats and MSM remind me of a little leaguer who hits a ground ball that goes through the shortstop and the left fielder's legs and rolls to the wall screaming "I hit a home run, I hit a home run".
Strange that Mr Hedges is ignoring those parts of this "reform" which seriously damage the health care of women.
Probably he hasn't given it much thought --
but I agree with you and you should elaborate on those damages.
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
Your cliche is a myth as well... how can a woman give life without a man's sperm...?
Um, Hedges excoriates all of it. The entire bill. As it applies to everyone.
Women, men, children.
Why do women have to be special victims here?
See, your argument implies that the bill would be just swell if it only treated women better.
So, you're either a well-intentioned, albeit misinformed or none-too-bright progressive, or you're an operative, willing or otherwise, of the divide-and-conquer corporatists who "passed"--synonymous, in some contexts, including this one, with "excrete"--this abominable bill.
For the nth time, albeit with a different iteration:
The conflict is not between Democrats and Republicans. Nor is it between men and women, poor and middle class, blacks and whites and latinos and...
It is between humans and corporations.
So cut it out. Hedges unequivocally states the bill sucks balls, and that would be true even if women all received gold plated gynecology and prenatal care, because it would still suck balls for men, boys, and girls.
Sheesh.
"It is between humans and corporations."
Not quite. This is class war, humans against wealthy humans that capitalize through the corporations.
Right.
The humans that control corporations wouldn't be so troublesome if we stripped them of the protection of those corporations.
Class war is too casually batted about as a term which implies that there are large groups of people competing for scarce resources.
The truly wealthy are assisted by the upper middle class--lawyers, accts, gov't bureaucrats and so on. The middle class shoulder most of the burden, and the poor and prison class are just there to scare the fuck out of the middle and upper middle classes to keep them working for the elite.
So yeah, it's class war, if you go with approx. 400 families constituting a "class".
If the rest of us united against them, who would win that conflict?
That'd be us.
"The middle class shoulder most of the burden, and the poor and prison class are just there to scare the fuck out of the middle and upper middle classes to keep them working for the elite."
The "middle class" shoulders "the burden" eh? And the poor are "just there" to scare poeple? I guess you don't know many poor poeple, don't you?
I do not mean to imply that the poor do not work hard or pay taxes. I mean only that the middle class and poor are pitted against one another by the elites to prevent us from destroying their game. If the wealth were more equally distributed, there would be no problems. But a very few control most wealth, and to maintain it must keep us from coming together.
That's all, mon frer. I myself am poor.
Great posts Puffin,
This class warfare you speak of is just like the so-called "war" between the Israelis and Palestinians. In reality it's Israeli jet fighters vs. the Palestinian teenagers armed with rocks. With us as the Palestinians!
The only difference is, if we could all come together, we could muster 300 million rocks that no one could escape.....
BTW, we don't need to justify our posts to a troll like Metal. His modus operandi is to divide and conquer.
Cheers mate,
TJ
To only criticize and attack allies without offering alternatives does nothing but preach to the hardcore choir. How effective is that?
What "allies" ? Mr. Hedges is pointing out that, once again, the Democrats have sold us out, and they are NOT our "allies."
Though I guess you could say that the Democrats are our "allies" in the same way that Lucy was Charlie Brown's "ally," since, like Charlie Brown, we always see our Democratic "allies" pull the ball away at the last minute."
Yesterday I attended an antiwar rally in Seattle, and was delighted to learn that long-time progressive activist Dr. Richard Curtis is running for the U.S. Senate as an independent. (richardcurtis4senate.org) I can't wait to vote for him, and am sending him some money this morning.
My "alternative" from now on is to vote third party when possible, and otherwise to vote against the incumbent. Reminds me of the old bumper sticker: "Stop repeat offenders: don't re-elect them."
Are Kucinich and Moveon now the enemies? No wonder the left is so weak.
julian3
They are indeed. And yes they weaken the left. Very observent!
They are certainly unprincipled sell outs who cannot be trusted to keep their word when they pledge to do something, and then do the opposite. With friends like that who needs enemies.
Neither Kucinich nor moveone are left they center right astrofturf tools of corporations they only look "left" to MSM watchers conditioned to seeing proto-fascist as moderate and centrist. :(
MoveOn is a phony arm of ther Dem Party funded by Sorros. Dennis is a phony non-progressive. I'd say they're not our friends.
F*uck them both.
Chelsea
It's too depressing to count the number of times I've heard "... even Kucinich voted for it ..." in the last several days, thus vindicating and validating the Health Insurance Bailout Act of 2010 apologists everywhere.
When the Last Man Standing sat down last week the final bit of air was sucked out of the left flank of the fight against this monstrosity of a bill, leaving only the wackos. That's what makes Dennis's sellout so devastating.
And to you blue kool-aid drinkers like Julian3, clean out your ears and open your damn eyes.
("To only criticize and attack allies without offering alternatives does nothing but preach to the hardcore choir. How effective is that?") -- "allies"? -- "hardcore choir"?? -- "...without offering alternatives"???-- are you kidding? Easily one of the more ridiculous posts on CD in a long time.
Hmmm. Did I strike a nerve?
So you change your post from "Thanks for proving my point" to this one. What are you, 12?
You've proved from all of your previous postings that you think we on the left "bicker" too much. "Why can't we all just get along ... sniff?"
You've also proved that it doesn't matter how many reasons we give as to why this bill is worse than nothing at all, or how thorough and fact-filled those reasons are, or how many times we point out that there IS a logical, inexpensive, moral alternative to the monumental disaster of a bill you support (an alternative supported by the vast majority of Americans, by the way).
Not that you'll get it any time soon, but this isn't about striking a nerve with me or anyone else on this site -- it is about the nerves of the Democratic Party and their apologists, which have been on strike for most of my sixty years on this planet.
Z-Man
YEP!
I'm perplexed. How you know my political leanings so well?
Sorry to ruffle yer feathers.
you have added zero to the discussion. go back where you came from; i'm guessing perhaps from under a rock.
Yes, it's rather shocking.
The majority of Americans wanted a public option - at least - in this bill, including over 88% of Democratic voters. Yet, Democrats refused to put it in. Pretty stinking deal, I'd say.
They are not serving We the People .... but we pay them, and we vote for them. All the while they take huge amounts of money from entities working against us. Yeah, it strikes a nerve.
BTW Z man, I never thanked you for the "Requiring Individuals to Obtain Health Insurance: A Constitutional Analysis." So thanks.
Hey DCH -- I think you mean to thank "zmann", not me.
It's OK -- Mom mixes us up all the time, too ... ;o )
Why denigrate the people taking a principled stand against this privatization forced consumption from the health corps as wackos? That isn't helpful at all. The people standing up for single payer are the people with principles fighting against the corporate takeover of America which is sensible not "wacko."
julian3, are you referring to the Obama admin who excluded from the process progressives and single-payer advocates and the clear and effective solutions that they attempted to present?
No, that was not effective in creating any reform.
I am referring to attacking Kucinich, Moveon, or anyone else, regardless of track record, for making a compromise. Being truly effective would be to find ways to unite progressives, not divide us.
Julian 3, are you in the Rahm Emmanuel school of Democratic politics? Their strategy to "unite progressives" is to exclude progressive ideas from consideration, bully progressive representatives into betraying their promises, and then mock and shame progressives who decide to leave the abusive relationship.
I'm not sure how MoveOn "compromised." First they supported Kucinich for promising to vote against any health care reform bill that didn't include a public option. Then they attacked Kucinich for the same thing. This was a total reversal, not a "compromise." MoveOn is a tool of the corporate Dems, and I've taken myself off their email list.
I'm not sure how Kucinich "compromised." He promised to hold out for a public option, and then he folded under White House pressure. He sold out the people like me who are not in his district, but supported him because he promised not to cave. Maybe the people in Kucinich's district in Ohio really wanted him to vote for the insurance reform bill, in which case Kucinich did the right thing. But I'm not supporting him with my money again.
Maybe Rahm Emmanuel is right, and most progressives will swallow the abuse and stick with the Democrats. But you can count me out.
Phuking A, petrkrop,
Welcome to the third party side.
My opinion is: We've got two choices here.
1. Join the 3rd biggest parties: the Libertarians or Greens and take in all Common Americans who have been screwed, and put an immediate stop to the wars (which is their main plank) or
2. Revolt in an National Boycott and National Strike where we all get the blu flu, stay home and default on our mortgages and credit cards and all bills at the same time.
If we stay fragmented into greens, Naders, Libertarians, and Independents, all we'll get is more duopoly follies.
While outdated, this chart is interesting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._party_affiliation.svg
I found it here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_parties_in_the_United_States
TJ
While I believe - and have stated - that 'third parties' need to unite, I still have heard nothing from third-party supporters about what electing a couple of third party members of Congress could be expected to accomplish on its own.
You need to do much more than vote third party.
julian3
You hit the nail on the head. Kucinich, Moveon...people and organizations like them do divide and betray progressives and liberals alike.
Mistaking betrayal, lying and dishonesty for compromise is not helpful.
Found this in the comments over this piece over at Truthdig. I left the link at the bottom, and while I didn't read the whole thing word for word, but in skimming it, you would take this entire speech and place it on the teleprompter for Barack to parrot. It's complete with the heart-wrenching stories Barack is so fond of, and his supporters eat up, citing that he is a caring individual.
HEALTH COVERAGE FOR ALL CALIFORNIANS
Bruce Bodaken
Chairman, President & CEO, Blue Shield of California
"First, employers, with the exception of the smallest companies, would be required either to offer coverage or contribute the financial equivalent for an essential benefit package for their employees. Employees would be permitted to opt out and purchase coverage as they do today. Second, every eligible Californian would be enrolled in a Medi-Cal or Healthy Families program. The state needs to work with the private sector on creating an effective outreach strategy to achieve this goal of full enrollment. Third, all other uninsured Californians would be required to purchase coverage in the individual market on a guaranteed basis, with no one denied coverage based on a pre-existing condition. Those who can't afford that coverage would pay their fair share and be subsidized for the rest. Fourth, an essential benefits package defined by independent medical professionals would specify the minimum level of coverage, which would include preventive care, physician services, hospital care and prescription drugs. Some health plans today offer products that don't meet this minimum level of care. Those products would be eliminated, either voluntarily or through regulation."
http://www.commonwealthclub.org/archive/02/02-12bodaken-speech.html
Fvck Blue Shield.
They're not going to pay for any of the claims just like they don't now.
How's this big corporate government working out for you?
Pretty soon they're going to mandate home insurance for all, and Umbrella lawsuit coverage for all, and life insurance for all... Failure to purchase the high-priced/low-payout product means JAIL.
This is not a Free Country anymore.
We let the camels nose poke under the tent by mandating private auto insurance and now private health care policies, and pretty soon the whole camel is going to come crashing into our tent.
This is not health care reform. This is another citizen-borne AIG insurance bailout.
TJ
Our people's government has been privatized as everything
will be -- unless the public begins to organize and
mobilize. Social Security and Medicare will be next for
destruction.
While our attention has been on health care deform, Obama
and the right wing are at work dismantling the public school
system in America -- attacking teachers - and their union.
First, up end the myth of corporate "personhood."
It's the only way to get corporate money out of the system and
some compassion back into it.
.
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
As various schools of human development show, it's a more effective strategy to focus on "how" systems and individuals are organized then to intellectually scrap everything and start organizing anew (are you going to organize a new language and numbering system, or the biological process that creates language and numbering?). That's why it's better to use MoveOn as a model while not a leader or scraping their experience all together.
And in organizing and for getting to a deep and broad human experience it's very valuable, if not the only way, to realize mythological constructs are the natural process for dealing with mystery and linking the past to the present for courage for stepping off the cliff of the future: i. e., "corporate 'personhood'" is the law of the land that has arisen out of the actions culminating from a myriad of personal myths.
Even within families reading from the same holy, poetry or philosophy books there is variance in mythology...and that includes a myth different from yours where the interplay of feminine and masculine aspects are integral to life itself. Thus, if you were to be so bold as to question your mythological construct that "according to all myth, the female -- not the male -- gives life", you would find a less antagonistic and more solid and composed organizing mythological statement. For, though I'm not well traveled, I have yet to meet a female, or male, that can give the life of a single grain of grass, never mind the complexity of the human form(s). No one makes/creates a meal, though they take part in preparing a meal...making this human realization will go far towards preparing a cornerstone for the foundation that moves beyond Our current callous corporate state and into a new organization entailing the human compassion for which you call.
I listened to the majority of the "debate" on Politico and C-Span yesterday and was aghast at the cliches and the empty rhetoric on both sides of the aisle.
At the end of the day the irony of the matter is that the Republicans have historically been the pro-corporation party (witness the Republican-heavy Supreme Court decision to grant personhood status to corporations) yet not one voted for this so-called bailout package to insurance corporations.
How does this jive with what CH is saying here? If this is really a corporation-driven bill, why was there NOT ONE republican who voted for it?
While I admire CH and his opinions, is there an over simplification of the issue here and a dogma over complex and often contradictory reality.
As a primary care physician myself, I do not understand the bill and cannot predict what the consequences will be, but I do know that the bickering over this bill between R and D challenges some assumptions about who is really benefiting from the legislation.
Terry, I see your point. I also find it odd that I'm on the same side of the issue as the right, the extreme right, and the tea baggers. (Politics does indeed make strange bedfellows.) I see a couple of possible explanations (and I'm sure there are many more): I believe this bill taxes the so-called Cadillac health plans, and of course the right opposes taxes; and I think Republicans perceive this legislation as government-run healthcare, even though the insurance companies are still running the show.
Anne - another confounder might be the fact that the republican party is experiencing rebirthing pains since it now seems to encompass both traditional, fiscal-conservative republicans as well as angry tea baggers, and therefore the future of the GOP is threatened, hence an almost knee-jerk rejection of anything that even smells of bigger government, not to mention contituent rage that will be vented during election time.
Terry Scott
And I would guess that the democrats just handed the Tea Party an army of foot soldiers and a ton of money. Hooray for Pelosi/Reid and Obama.
I would say the future of the republican party is assured.
I wouldn't be so quick to think Republicans will gain from the passage of this bill. Are they seriously going to campaign on repeal? One of the first things to go into effect is closing up the so-called doughnut hole in Medicare so they would be campaigning to repeal that fix. That wouldn't go over so well with the Medicare crowd, also known as the majority of the people who actually vote. Same for the middle-class friends of mine who can put their out-of-work children back on their policies. This bill gives just enough and gives it quickly enough that people will not be willing to relinquish what they have gained, and that's how the debate will be framed.
It gives next-to-nothing to the poor, but they don't vote.
sherry
I believe you are going to find this bill doesn't do much for anyone but insurance companies and the taxman. People haven't gained much at all. Frankly I haven't read a bill this blatently corrupt before.
If you thought all those folks were unhappy before, I'd say you haven't seen anything yet.
And I firmly believe that with this vote the democrats just handed the House back for sure and the Senate is a possibility. Obama is assuredly a one termer.
We'll know soon enough.
It's all kabuki theater dude. You know good cop bad cop , they are all giving us the finger and giving themselves high-fives,out our view of course. They are all corporate owned scum period.
"D"