Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Great Thing About the Health Care Law That Has Passed? It Will Save Republican Lives, Too
An Open Letter to Republicans
To My Fellow Citizens, the Republicans:
Thanks to last night's vote, that child of yours who has had asthma since birth will now be covered after suffering for her first nine years as an American child with a pre-existing condition.
Thanks to last night's vote, that 23-year-old of yours who will be hit one day by a drunk driver and spend six months recovering in the hospital will now not go bankrupt because you will be able to keep him on your insurance policy.
Thanks to last night's vote, after your cancer returns for the third time -- racking up another $200,000 in costs to keep you alive -- your insurance company will have to commit a criminal act if they even think of dropping you from their rolls.
Yes, my Republican friends, even though you have opposed this health care bill, we've made sure it is going to cover you, too, in your time of need. I know you're upset right now. I know you probably think that if you did get wiped out by an illness, or thrown out of your home because of a medical bankruptcy, that you would somehow pull yourself up by your bootstraps and survive. I know that's a comforting story to tell yourself, and if John Wayne were still alive I'm sure he could make that into a movie for you.
But the reality is that these health insurance companies have only one mission: To take as much money from you as they can -- and then work like demons to deny you whatever coverage and help they can should you get sick.
So, when you find yourself suddenly broadsided by a life-threatening illness someday, perhaps you'll thank those pinko-socialist, Canadian-loving Democrats and independents for what they did Sunday evening.
If it's any consolation, the thieves who run the health insurance companies will still get to deny coverage to adults with pre-existing conditions for the next four years. They'll also get to cap an individual's annual health care reimbursements for the next four years. And if they break the pre-existing ban that was passed last night, they'll only be fined $100 a day! And, the best part? The law will require all citizens who aren't poor or old to write a check to a private insurance company. It's truly a banner day for these corporations.
So don't feel too bad. We're a long way from universal health care. Over 15 million Americans will still be uncovered -- and that means about 15,000 will still lose their lives each year because they won't be able to afford to see a doctor or get an operation. But another 30,000 will live. I hope that's ok with you.
If you don't mind, we're now going to get busy trying to improve upon this bill so that all Americans are covered and so the grubby health insurance companies will be put out of business -- because when it comes to helping the sick, no one should ever be allowed to ask the question, "How much money can we save by making this poor bastard suffer?"
Please, my Republican friends, if you can, take a quiet moment away from your AM radio and cable news network this morning and be happy for your country. We're doing better. And we're doing it for you, too.
Yours,
Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com
P.S. I'll have more to say on this tonight, live on CNN, at 9pm ET. I'll be talking with Larry King about the health care bill and where we go from here, considering we still don't have universal health care.
P.P.S. In case you missed these photos in yesterday's NY Times Sunday Magazine... That's the results of seven years of madness. The Iraq War began its 8th year this weekend. How can we remove more of those responsible for this tragedy in November?
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



177 Comments so far
Show AllI, for one, would like to welcome our insurance-company masters.
Phone Calls to Wall Street:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOZTldbo2Fw
Sounds like Moore drank whatever kool-aid was left after Obama gave Kucinich his ration. Moore's comments lend legitimacy to the bill. He doesn't understand that there is little difference between denying victims insurance coverage and pricing victims out of the market.
Just typical Moore... make all kind of radical noises and radical content in his movies, but when the time comes to make a stand, cave in and kiss-up to the Democrats.
Really? What have you done besides dittohead comments on CD?
As Seinfeld would say to George, "Really-Michael, really--Now we can expect the progressive caucus that vowed not to pass the bill without what was, in my mind a weak public option, now we can expect them to get a backbone and go right back at it to make this bill better? Really Michael, are you going to go back to your familiar refrain that we need to support these cowards. Progressives, let's show Rahm that he is wrong about us, that we aren't going to be whipped in line, that real health care reform is more important to us than a tenuous party identity where we are tramped on at every turn, especially by people like Sanders and Kuccinich who once again say that no matter how they voted they are really on our side. Really- Micheal, Really Dennis, Really Bernie. I've had it with you guys-- when you learn how to stand together, hold for your convictions, and have the guts to stand up to Rahm-- let me know--you willl find me in the Green Party for now.
Kucinich answered his own rhetorical question, and yes, sadly, this is the best he can do. I switched to Democrat to support Kucinich in the 2008 D caucus. I'm going back to the Green Party this morning.
Michael, I believe you are a little premature. This bill does not start saving lives until 2014. Can you explain that to me?
Maybe you can have one of the insurance companies who wrote this legislation explain it to me.
Why you are at it, why don't you get an estimate on the savings to health care subscribers if a public option had been included? More than ___________ Billions?
How is the bill going to start saving lives in 2014, or any time after?
While the bill may not save any lives it will enhance the quality of lives...drug and insurance company CEOs will see their incomes substantially rise and the quality of their lives substantially increase.
Well, so much for what I said about Moore finally getting the point about the Dems last week, and Obama. Without a major growth of backbone in the progressives nothing will happen. You've got a President in there who has no desire to speak the words Medicare for All and showed backbone and did a lot of arm-twisting when it came to getting rid of the public option.
Does Moore really think Obama wants to sign anything that would endanger his corporate donations? It will take a lot of backbone indeed, although I would get great joy in seeing Obama have to choke back the tears as he was forced to sign something that was indeed real health care reform.
Nancy's been grinning like the Cheshire cat since yesterday and the rest of the clowns have all been doing a lot of back-slapping and I'm sure the champagne is flowing. It's been fun hearing the spin. On the front page of one of the rags: Obama declares victory for the American people. Lying sack of shit.
Yes, right about now I almost with I was blissfully ignorant, like all those who only listen to NPR and the MSM and read the rags and listen to Obama. I would probably be happier and maybe healthier, but it's just not in my DNA.
Yeah. He almost brings himself to the point where he can admit that the Democrats are complicit in the corporate rule we now endure, then backpedals like a weeping pansy.
Seeya, Michael. Until you can call it like it is. Now, youre just a slightly left-leaning pillar of the MSM/MIC.
For some reason, Michael Moore continues to believe in the party -- named the Democrats, in much the same way that Kucinich is, above all else, a Democrat first. There is something delusional about their system of beliefs, and it resembles a "blind faith" of sorts -- IMHO.
I still have many friends who blindly believe in Obama, and despite his rhetoric and lies, they imagine that he is playing some kind of grand chess game, in the name of "we the people," even though the results, time-and-again, demonstrate the exact opposite. For the most part, many of my friends can't even admit to the fact that the health insurance reform bill won't take effect until 2014. That tiny issue seems to them to be irrelevant. One of my friends is actually signed up on the voter roles as an Independent, and yet she and her husband are more inclined to believe the Democrats than some of my friends who are registered, at this moment, as Democrats. From time-to-time, she replies weakly to my e-mails, but I haven't heard from her for weeks, since I reminded her, for the umpteenth time, "Obama is NOT on our side. Instead, he advocates for the corporations."
"Nancy's been grinning like the Cheshire cat since yesterday and the rest of the clowns have all been doing a lot of back-slapping and I'm sure the champagne is flowing." -- Samalabear
No doubt, you are correct!
This morning, I watched Democracy Now! and Amy broadcast parts of Obama's speech, along with John Boehner's and Pelosi's. I could barely stand to listen and watch them lie, spinning their web into some kind of salvation in the name of the public interest. Not once did any of these so-called leaders mention the fact that the bill would not go into effect until 2014 -- four years from now. And, I'm sure that most people who regularly weigh in on this site are aware that at least 36 states are planning to challenge the mandate to buy health insurance, and other parts of the bill as well, in the courts. This bill, as it is, is NOT a done deal, so to speak. I'm sure that the Democrats know it, too!
One of my older friends -- who has had some health problems as of late -- acts completely ignorant when I bring up single-payer health care, etc. Over the past three or four weeks, I have helped her get to-and-from her doctor appointments, and I can't believe what she has had to go through -- first of all, the paperwork goes on forever. Her sprained wrist, diagnosed and cast at a New York City hospital, turned out to be a badly broken wrist, and my friend ended up having surgery on her arm this past Friday.
However, I have been, quite honestly, very frustrated with her through this last episode. My friend actually looked at me and said, "I don't know what you mean -- I don't know what single-payer is." She is on Medicare, now, and has been on Medicare for quite a few years, but doesn't seem to connect with the reality. Of course, she watches nothing and reads nothing but M$M -- TV and newspapers. And, most of us on this site know that M$M is corporate media. She did NOT know that the U.S. is rated 37th amongst health care systems in the world, etc. She still wants to believe in the Democrats and the U.S.A.
I have had similar experiences with my older friends...people who know I have no insurance and haven't had for years, still think that if I was somehow provided health care then they and their senior friends would suddenly start dropping like flies from being forced to wait for life-saving procedures.
The media phantasmagoria controls reality. Until it is destroyed--or rendered useful--we are well and truly screwed.
Mr. Moore is delusional. This bill will only save the health insurance industry, with the full force of the IRS.
Insurance stocks have been soaring all year in anticipation of their victory especially since all price controls have been taken out of this bill.
Goodbye Michael & good luck to you...
"D"
Now that the health insurance corporations have an additional thirty million or so captive policy holders, they'll be their usual mericless selves in raising premiums, deductible & copays, such that fewer and fewer people will be able to afford their policies. The net result will be that the number of uninsured will start climbing again. What's more, on account of runaway premiums the cost of this "reform" are likely to far exceed the predictions of the Congressional Budget Office, whereupon, opponents of universal health care (even this weak version of it) will be gleefully chanting their all to familiar mantra, "Government is the problem, not the solution". We then can expect a Republican Congress to pass "kill the HCR bill" legislation, and that'll be it for health care for all. Nice going President Obama and Congress. You may have passed HCR but you've failed the American people.
What bothers me is how well I remember the period between the election victory of Bill Clinton and his inauguration. During that short time a body of Republican psychopaths determined to destroy precisely whatever the majority of Americans had voted for. The purpose of democracy is to put US in power and when that does not happen, "democracy is not working" and so the end justifies the violent and criminal means. What it comes closest to is the adolescent mentality of a stalker.
And if health care reform had come to the United (?) States by plebiscite, no matter the ratio of Yes to NO votes, the apoplectic NOs would each become a "Kenneth Starr" and mayhaps prowl dark hospital wards, twisting valves and yanking plugs out of the wall for the good of the country.
Anybody else remember the time when, due to union disputes, Greyhound Buses needed tail gunners? God bless America. I'm still ticked at Michael Moore for saying to Wolf Blitzer - "We live in the best nation on earth."
Trylon
After making Sicko Moore actually told Wolf Blitzer that "we live in the best nation on earth"? Moore learned [or should have learned] during the making of his film how the insured have been screwed by the system and how so many other advanced countries [and less advanced like Cuba] make sure that their citizens receive basic health care and yet he had the naivete [or the stupidity] to come up with that flag-waving statement. It is way past the point that Michael Moore remove his rose colored glasses and take a look at his own film in the hope that he might finally come to the realization that the United States is not, despite his bizarre belief, the best nation on earth. Michael Moore may want to try reading The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and Better Health Care by T.R. Reid. If he did, then perhaps he might, at long last, acknowledge how unequal and inferior this country actually is.
Erroll, I've been pushing the book by T.R. Reid for some four months, now. Glad to see I am not by myself.
Since 1990 I've created quite a long library shelf of books on HC reform, but my ALL TIME sentimental favorite is a book called "The Sold Gold Stethoscope". It was published in 1976, written by Edgar Berman, MD. Dr. Berman did chest surgery in Lambarene, with Dr. Albert Schweitzer handing him the instruments. Dr. Berman was the personal physician of Vice President Hubert Humphrey. Berman is creator-author of the beloathed ==Hippocritic Oath==.
"I swear by Midas, my malpractice insurance, the AMA, and all other gods and goddesses that according to my ambition and Cupidity I will keep this Oath. I shall reckon him who taught me this art equally dear to me as my banker or broker, and relieve his necessities if required, but only if he shall relieve mine. I will impart a knowledge of this art to my sons, if they accept amnesty and return from Canada and their communes. Bound by stipulation and oath according to the laws of the marketplace, I shall teach this art to none other, in order to keep the windfall within the family and medical establishment."
The Hippocritic Oath continues for five paragraphs, each ten laughs a minute.
Trylon
Looking back, Sicko seems like some kind of preparatory propaganda for this bill.
This health care bill is a piece of crap. I am so glad it passed. We can make it better over time.
Most certainly the corporate forces aligned against their profits will remain strong. Realistically, ripping profits away from various corporate entities at one fell swoop is impossible. Change is now in motion. Little by little, it might keep getting better. It's an endless fight, Rich. Incrementalism, hip, hip...
Talking about incrementalism may look great but let's be serious. This bill is nothing of a step in the right direction. At best, it's all faith based not guaranteed to help the people supporters of the bill claim it will help. At worst, it's more taxes and too easy profiteering for the insurers. Thanks to this bill, insurance CEOs can stick out their hats and watch our tax dollars pouring in. Isn't it ironic that this party could shamelessly have the government be the insurers' best friend for massive theft? If you want incremental improvements, trying learning some history from South Africa after the apartheid. Even that nation offers some universal health care similar to Europe doing a private and public mix from what I have been informed. Before the US-backed apartheid had ended, there was no universal health care in South Africa. Don't you feel ashamed that the US is imprisoning itself in an economic apartheid?
I think incrementalism will happen. It's been happening all my life. Sadly, it's been towards fascism -- and I expect that will continue until the people rise up against it.
This Health Bill did not give Americans the right to health care, it only gave us the requirement and burden to buy private health care insurance.
This bill in effect has killed any chance of single payer health care in our life time.
This must be consolation for S-P advocates.
Yep, No Insurance Company Left Behind.
Doesn't do a thing to reduce ridiculous gouging by the Wall St. gang.
I will never spend another farthing on a M. Moore film, ever.
Moore is just another bought and paid for Dem shill.
"Saves lives?"
After correctly enumerating some of the deficiencies and loop-holes in the bill which will allow the insurance bastards to continue business as usual, making money by denying care, how can Moore say this "saves lives?"
Now we're going to "improve" the bill? I'm afraid to learn what the "improvements" will consist of. Will they add a mandate-to-buy apartment and grocery insurance so as to end homelessness and hunger?
Well done. Moore reminds me of a POW who thinks positive thoughts while getting served his tablespoon of rotten rice for the day. And nipping the grass for desert.
RichM
Please add yourself to my posted list above and thanks.
This may not make sense, but I have come to the conclusion that there are 2 Michael Moores. One who is a great documentary film maker and radical, saying things like "capitalism is evil, and you can't reform evil" and, another MM who is a Liberal and writes smarmy apologia for the Democrats (the "second most enthusiastic capitalist party"). I cannot reconcile the two, so I have concluded that they are two different people.
That is a good way to look at that mysterious man. The first MM you mentioned was obvious when Republicans were in power while the second one took over when the Democrats were in power. He must have some kind of a Jekyll-Hyde formula that he uses depending upon election outcomes.
"...your insurance company will have to commit a criminal act if they even think of dropping you from their rolls."
You're kidding, right, Mike? Prior to that, spelled out in the bill, they can triple your premium. If that doesn't cut you, they will not hesitate to commit that "criminal act", which, if it had real penalties, say prison terms as tough as marijuana possession, well, that might mean something. As it is, predators will simply pay the usual cost-of-business fine, and you're just as dead. This is a historic theatrical sham, farce, tragedy. I'm surprised Mike has fallen in with thieves.
Doug Terpstra
Please add yourself to my posted list above and thanks.
Moore spelled out the so-called criminal act last week on Countdown and in his blog, which appeared here. He was the only that did it. He gave the example of the cancer patient facing a $100,000 operation. Which makes this statement a total crock of shit. He sounds like Obama here, and I'm sure the insurance companies are quaking in their boots. Pharma has dished out hundreds of thousands in fines over the years -- but they do just fine. The offending drugs stay on the market, they keep being advertised to rake in more bodies, they raise the prices a bit, and it just going on and on ... It is the cost of doing business.
"If you want to hear the new theme song of the democratic party, simply pull up an old episode of MASH"
raydelcamino, Perry logan, peaceocrap, tammons, thepuffin, Kay Johnson, Samalabear, Yankee, amsocialist, Thalidomide, yourstruly, Trylon, Erroll, jimmytwoshoes, NMBill, BodhiHawk, Naturally...
I am proud to put this post here today, simply proud to be among so many good people that can recognize manure no matter how high its piled.
I am also proud to be among so many people that see Mr. Moore for exactly what he really is.
My thanks to you all for saying what I was going to.
Likewise, my friend.
Michael Moore performs some sort of service by getting his message out to the masses through his films. He should be banned from these sorts of sites because he has proven over and over to be a fool. He's like the corporate characters in his own films who don't realize that they're being made fun of. From Wesley Clark as President to Barach Obama ("Nat Clean Coal") to now: "Healthcare Reform" he demonstrates how easily "Progressives" rise to the bait of "Good Cop/Bad Cop". The manipulation is cunning and effective. Now the "Left" has been identified for some time to come with Barach Obama and the Democratic Party's policies. These policies can't serve the people because they're crafted to serve the corporations. Their failure and the frustration and anger generated will be directed at "The Left".
Anyone with any sense on the Left should be disavowing any association with Barach Obama and the Democrats. They should be branded as corporate stooges betraying the American people more deviously but equally as perniciously as the more identifiable Republican thugs.
dougrant, Michael Moore lives in the REAL world. The health care reform CAN be the FIRST step toward universal health care in America. But in order to avoid financial catastrophe we'll have to get rid of our 725 military bases and 5 wars around the world.
Just as Barach Obama could be the first step toward the revolution necessitated on the part of the American people....or maybe, just maybe, he (Barach Obama) could be a simulation of change offered to prevent change from occurring. The Healthcare plan could be also be simulation of healthcare reform. And the REAL world could be a collection of manipulative images arranged to distract people while business is conducted as usual.
If we consume one/fourth of the world's resources is it because those in other places feel we can make better use of their resources than they ...and just hand them over? Or could it be that the people that profit most from utilization of those resources use the public military till to ensure that those resources are delivered into the proper hands?
Agree with your sentiment; however, I have no problem with Moore or other purported leftists giving their opinions on this site even though I don't agree with them because it gives us a chance to expose the weaknesses of their arguments. Also, I don't want to shut my ears to differing views because I use them in developing my opinion.
Published on Monday, March 22, 2010 by TruthDig.com
The Health Care Hindenburg Has Landed
by Chris Hedges
Rep. Dennis Kucinich's decision to vote "yes" in Sunday's House action on the health care bill, although he had sworn to oppose the legislation unless the And so he signed on to a bill that will do nothing to ameliorate the suffering of many Americans, will force tens of millions of people to fork over a lot of money for a defective product and, in the end, will add to the ranks of our uninsured.
The claims made by the proponents of the bill are the usual deceptive corporate advertising. The bill will not expand coverage to 30 million uninsured, especially since government subsidies will not take effect until 2014. Families who cannot pay the high premiums, deductibles and co-payments, estimated to be between 15 and 18 percent of most family incomes, will have to default, increasing the number of uninsured. Insurance companies can unilaterally raise prices without ceilings or caps and monopolize local markets to shut out competitors. The $1.055 trillion spent over the next decade will add new layers of bureaucratic red tape to what is an unmanageable and ultimately unsustainable system.
The mendacity of the Democratic leadership in the face of this reality is staggering. Howard Dean, who is a doctor, said recently: "This is a vote about one thing: Are you for the insurance companies or are you for the American people?" Here is a man who once championed the public option and now has sold his soul. What is the point in supporting him or any of the other Democrats? How much more craven can they get?
The only good news is that health care stocks and bonuses for the heads of these corporations are shooting upward. Chalk this up as yet another victory for our feudal overlords and a defeat for the serfs.
This bill is not about fiscal responsibility or the common good. The bill is about increasing corporate profit at taxpayer expense. It is the health care industry's version of the Wall Street bailout. It lavishes hundreds of billions in government subsidies on insurance and drug companies. The some 3,000 health care lobbyists in Washington, whose dirty little hands are all over the bill, have once more betrayed the American people for money. The bill is another example of why change will never come from within the Democratic Party. The party is owned and managed by corporations. The five largest private health insurers and their trade group, America's Health Insurance Plans, spent more than $6 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2009. Pfizer, the world's biggest drug maker, spent more than $9 million during the last quarter of 2008 and the first three months of 2009. The Washington Post reported that up to 30 members of Congress from both parties who hold key committee memberships have major investments in health care companies totaling between $11 million and $27 million. President Barack Obama's director of health care policy, who will not discuss single payer as an option, has served on the boards of several health care corporations. And as salaries for most Americans have stagnated or declined during the past decade, health insurance profits have risen by 480 percent.
Obama and the congressional leadership have consciously shut out advocates of single payer from the debate. The press, including papers such as The New York Times, treats single payer as a fringe movement. The television networks rarely mention it. And yet between 45 and 60 percent of doctors favor single payer. Between 40 and 62 percent of the American people, including 80 percent of registered Democrats, want universal, single-payer not-for-profit health care for all Americans. The ability of the corporations to discredit and silence voices that represent at least half of the population is another sad testament to the power of our corporate state to frame all discussions.
Change will come only by building movements that stand in fierce and uncompromising opposition to the Democrats and the Republicans. If they can herd Kucinich and John Conyers, the sponsors of House Resolution 676, a bill that would create a publicly funded National Health Program by eliminating private health insurers, onto the House floor to vote for this corporate theft, what is the point in pretending there is any room left for us in the party? And why should we waste our time with gutless liberal groups such as Moveon.org, which felt the need to collect more than $1 million to pressure House Democrats who had voted "no" on the original bill to recant? What was this purportedly anti-war group doing anyway serving as an obsequious recruiting arm of the Obama election campaign? The longer we tie ourselves to the Democrats and these bankrupt liberal organizations the more ridiculous and impotent we appear.
"I'm ready to listen to the White House, if the White House is ready to listen to the concerns about putting a public option in this bill," the old Kucinich said on the "Democracy Now!" radio and television program before he flipped. "I mean, they can do that. You know, they're still cutting last-minute deals. Put the public option back in. Make it a robust public option. Give the people a chance to really negotiate rates with the insurance companies ... from the standpoint of having a public option. But don't just tell the people that you're going to call this health care reform, when you're giving insurance companies an even more powerful monopoly status in our economy."
As many of the Democrats have been doing, Moore selects a part of the bill that is good to promote the whole bill, ignores the overriding negative that the bill is a sellout to insurance companies, and tells us to lower our expectation and have faith the Democrats will fix the bill in the future (tomorrow, tomorrow, tomorrow is their recurring theme). The Democrats could have easily passed some good parts of the piecemeal and quicker although they wouldn't have gotten as much lobby money by delaying the process.
Well said!!
Michael Michael. Like Obama, you sound so good, so pro working class and vested in fairness. But when the rubber hits the road you fall apart like a cheap suit.
What's needed is a more effective message to counter the free market argument. Lakoff has some good ideas but he can get a little cerebral. How about, instead of calling it socialized medicine or the apparently inscrutable single-payer, we name it the Insurance Company Elimination Act. Afterall, nobody, not one single person I ever debated with, can tell me why the hell health insurance companies are needed (and most have gotten screwed by them one way or another). Other than finding ways to deny care, they are the most expensive paper shufflers ever employed.
Or what about framing the issue this way: How would you like it if you never had to worry about health care again? That there's no possibility your family will ever go bankrupt if hit with a unfortunate calamity? No endless paperwork or doughnut holes. And yes, you can choose your own doctor, who, when recommending a needed procedure, can't be overruled by some high-rise bean counter. And if you didn't like any part of the way the system works, you and your fellow citizens can do something about it (your vote).
As for the 'afford' part - that's easiest of all to address. Beyond the mountains of cash that will be saved by eliminating the insurance industry, changes in the tax code and foreign policy would provide more than enough. If not, a separate, means-tested tax with caps.
But my arguments have foundered because oppponents can't get past the idea of evil government control. Reagan implanted that vile maggot on their brains and despite how bad things get, no amount of logic can kill it.
Glacier Worm,
Well said--I pointed out that rubber and road thing too.
LOL!
I hate the article but love the comments but let's face it. Who will listen to any of us? People want filth for entertainment and the Obama fools found their "Rush Limbaugh" that is Michael Moore a long time ago. My otherwise liberal minded family thinks I have a mental problem for opposing Obama's sham and instead calling for single payer. I was asked about what country I am basing the idea of single payer off of and the minute I said Canada, there they went blowing out the same old propaganda on waiting times as if the US does any better ! I try to explain why the current health care system needs to be demolished and replaced entirely by single payer and they get rude and talk loud over me. Even my sister spews Reagan talk on health care for all by saying "Why should government give people free food? Make them buy their own damn insurance !". She reads Huffington Post and Wall Street Journal for all her financial news. I can't believe their Obama talk ! If this were the Republicans passing this bill, they would have been on our side. They insist that the insurance companies will be forced to comply and before I can explain to them, they go nuts bugging me to buy hundreds of shares in Exxon, Chevron, some of these insurance and drug companies, Mcdonalds because soda will be $1 soon, etc... But what's to be surprised about when half of my relatives including my idiot cousin in Canada badmouth single payer with "Dr. Helen Smith" and take articles on little guys getting arrested for selling counterfeit drugs and giving their bullshit lecture on "Always trust big name drug companies for buying your meds !".
I am totally infuriated that I was reminded of what I read from Peter Schweitzer on Michael Moore's controversy on Halliburton. Isn't this the same Michael Moore who was exposed for being a sheer hypocrite in owning Halliburton stocks even as he loudly proclaimed to be anti-war? I wonder how many shares that fatty has invested in the pharmaceuticals and health insurers. Please tell us Mr. Moore and please post it on Huffington Post and Wall Street Journal so my stupid family and relatives can blow my brains out and call me a mental case for not throwing my money in the stock market ! Yep, I should say "thank you" to this bullshit 2700 pager, read Wall Street propaganda, gamble my hard earned money in the stock market with the delusion that I'll be a millionaire, and pay no attention to the bill's 2700 page fine print. I wonder how many fools in this country are Obamabots or Republican suckers like them.
I'm critical of Michael Moore for this article, however comparing him to Rush Limbaugh is just hogwash.
Ranjit Kumar
You can inform your relatives that waiting times in the good 'ol USA are hardly superior to countries like Canada as my wife had to wait five months before she was finally able to see a neurologist in Seattle about seven years ago. An easy way to swat aside the inane arguments given to you by your relatives is by purchasing and reading T.R. Reid's most excellent and relevant book The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper and Fairer Health Care. Reid looks at the health care systems of other countries with a fair and critical eye. His chapter on Canada is entitled "Sorry for the Wait", for example, which acknowledges the wait times that Canadians have to endure. But as Reid points out, they do not have to stand in line for life threatening injuries while their health care system costs a fraction of what Americans pay for theirs. But the entire book describes how and why other advanced countries can supply basic health care for its citizens while the US spends twice per capita than any other country.
If you read any book on health care, my suggestion, if I may, is to read this one, as it would be time well worth investing.
Waiting time has nothing to do with who pays for the service, but how much medica; service is available for the number of people needing it. To shorten wait time, invest in medical education and facilities.
(What?! Fund education and invest in building domestic infrastructure instead of destroying the children and infrastructure of other countries?? Why, I must be a pinko madman... hee, hee, hee)