EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Sky is Falling - on John Bolton
John Bolton has made a cottage industry out of trying to scare people about nuclear weapons. Contrary to the subtitle of Dr. Strangelove - "how I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb" - Bolton's motto seems to be "why you need to start worrying and embrace the bomb." He reiterates this point at every opportunity, most recently in a piece published in the Washington Examiner. But does he really believe that the Obama administration's modest but essential first steps towards reducing global nuclear arsenals are putting us in grave danger? I seriously doubt it.
Bolton believes in maintaining the status quo, a world in which the United States and Russia possess 95% of the world's arsenal of 20,000-plus nuclear weapons and it's not worth even trying to use diplomacy to reduce those arsenals, much less those of other nuclear powers. In his most recent piece, he even appears to dismiss President Obama's pledge to secure "all vulnerable nuclear materials in four years, so that they never fall into the hands of terrorists." What's Bolton's logic here? Do we need to leave loose nukes and unsecured bomb-making materials lying around to show we're tough? Or is he just so intent on opposing anything that the Obama administration is for that he will oppose even the most effective policies available for reducing the nuclear danger?
What are Bolton's alternatives to diplomacy? Bombing Iran? He has implied as much, even though the effects of such an action would most likely be to undermine the Iranian opposition, accelerate Tehran's efforts to seek a nuclear weapon, and sow further chaos in a region that can ill afford it. Invading North Korea? Even he doesn't seem willing to go that far over the top.
Instead of quaking in our boots at the prospect of nuclear arms cuts, as Bolton would like us to do, we need to look at the real security benefits of a multi-faceted approach to achieving substantial reductions. These steps should include a new nuclear arms reduction agreement (START), followed shortly thereafter by negotiations for even deeper cuts in U.S. and Russian arsenals; a global ban on all nuclear weapons tests (the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty); accelerated investments in securing all nuclear weapons and bomb-making materials; increased investments in the inspection capabilities of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); a concerted effort to solve the Kashmir problem and improve relations between India and Pakistan to the point that each nation will feel secure in reducing its nuclear arsenal; and a renewed global effort to get Iran and North Korea to curb and then reverse their nuclear weapons programs. Some of these steps are obviously harder - much harder - than others. But each of them is valuable in its own right, and we can't afford not to pursue them.
It's important to remember that there has been considerable success in reducing nuclear weapons over the past two decades. Since the end of the Cold War, more than twice as many countries have abandoned nuclear weapons or bomb-making programs as have initiated them. Total nuclear weapons stockpiles are down by over two-thirds since their peak in the mid-1960s. And programs like the Nunn-Lugar program - which invests in dismantling and securing Russian nuclear bombs and nuclear materials - have made impressive strides. There is no reason why we can't build on these successes to accomplish further reductions in nuclear weapons, making the world a far safer place in the process. We just need to make sure people don't buy into the scare talk of John Bolton and his cohorts.Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

38 Comments so far
Show AllBe very, very afraid of people using scare tactics to induce fear.
Scary !
Annabelle: I guess that means we should be very, very afraid of our U.S. Government!
The Upper Class Ruling Families are who we should all understand causes this propaganda of fear, ruling through fear and obeying from a place of fear.
Bolton, too, is Nuking FUTS!
the guy with black hair and white mustache. or is it white hair and black mustache. very odd man
Nuclear weapons are the ultimate Weapons of Mass Destruction. They are the tools of terrorism -- by a nation-state. Their rationale is Mutual Assured Destruction. Quite MAD I know.
But, as the article points out, there has been progress. There desperately needs to be more. Mass demonstrations have worked in the past with receptive leadership, but I am afraid we do not have that now, any more than we did in the last (shudder) administration. So how DO we bring pressure when protests and messages to the leader is ignored?
Damned if I know.
Gary
"Force is all-conquering, but its victories are short-lived."
-~ Abraham Lincoln
Bolton is psychotic. He is the evil anti-Captain Kangaroo. The Captain taught us how to respect others and how to get along. Bolton lives by a basic philosophy of instilling as much fear of others as possible and has respect for NO ONE.
Bolton needs to play the Chill Wills part in Dr Strangelove and ride a bomb all the way to the ground. Somehow I think he'd enjoy that. I know I would enjoy NOT having him around to bother and hurt the country any longer.
The man is obviously deranged. I can't understand why anyone, even on the right, would pay any attention to someone so far out of reality. Someone needs to tell him that it's not 1970 anymore. The Soviet Union is gone, we WON the GD cold war. Get OVER IT!
If you want to understand what is going on then you have to look at agendas. If the agenda is peace, then Bolton's ideas are insane. But if the agenda is war, domination, oppression, then Bolton's ideas are rational.
To sell his war agenda, Bolton will incite fears of external threats, real or not, inflame patriotism, and tout the economic benefit of the war-making enterprise.
And so while Bolton's sights are set on world domination, his subjects have set their sights on security, pride and prosperity. The leaders and followers each pursue their separate, but linked, agendas, which are highly unjust, misguided, or both.
And when is war EVER rational?.....NEVER
That part was played by Slim Pickens
He is truly pathological. I mean it. When i've seen him interviewed it is like he is not connected to anything. I mean, it is like Cheney but .....even more disturbing. Although.
Rumsfeld gets the award for the most perverted and twisted man i have ever laid eyes on. And.
He looks like a civil war re enactor.
Aren't there people in this world for whom an unused nuclear weapon is a wasted opportunity?
Bolton would look good dropping from 30,000 feet, riding a nuke. It was Slim Pickens who played Major Kong, though. The problem with those on the right, though, is Bolton is speaking their language - fear.
The United States does not want any other country to have nuclear bombs - because - some other country might have the moral reason to use one, just like the United States did against Japan. Having the nukes when no one else has them, rigs the game. Nukes will never disappear (unless we blow the entire planet to smithereens), the game will always be rigged. Lah dee dah, la dee dee........it is nice to dream of a peaceful world...
I'm still waiting for someone to demand that Israel abide by international law regarding nuclear weapons. Until this is done, along with hauling the Neo-cons to jail who provided much of the fake intelligence for the Iraq, little else matters.
When the US and Israel can act with impunity - the rest of the world will hestitate to agree to anything.
Oh, how that Mustache Must Ache when he tells these Whoppers to frighten small minds.
The best defence is to laugh in his face!
Funny that Hartung forgets the key irritant in the entire mess we're in in South West Asia and their "secret" nuke program.
Otherwise, he's right on.
Kim Jung Il named Bolton "Human Scum", I'm not so sure about the Human part.
John Bolton was ostracized while our UN representative and should be such wherever he goes and whatever he says.
I just read the Bolton article referenced in this piece.
It is largely gibberish.
The man is clearly a psychopath. Which helps explain why he was a Bush appointee.
-30-
Remember where his ravings got him under Bush. He probably thinks he would qualify for Secretary of State under the next Republican administration. Unfortunately, that may come sooner than we think because of Obama's waffling and wretched performance so far.
Bolt ON
Bolt OFF
Rave on, John, your volume has been squelched
Is that a milk mustache John or did your closet buddy miss?
Y'all do know that this is just the tip of the iceberg of the continuing shenanigans of shrub's and papa bush's administrations? Really scary is the Keep American Safe group.
I guess it's a group because the website is a .com instead of a .org. More of your corporate dollars at work! Bill Kristol, noted NYT neocon is on the board.
Started and lead by one of Cheney's daughters - Liz. I wonder if she thinks that America needs to be safe from her lesbian sister...
http://www.keepamericasafe.com
Thanks IowaIrish,
Bolton = Bush Empire Dog of War.
They didn't go away. They're still there, and their house boy is in the white house playing a good sting on all of us.
All Harvard and Yale University grads. All PNAC fanatics.
They won't be happy until we're all in a world war.
Criticism
Critics allege Bolton tried to spin intelligence to support his views and political objectives on a number of occasions. Greg Thielmann, of the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), was assigned as the daily intelligence liaison to Bolton. Thielmann stated to Seymour Hersh that, "Bolton seemed troubled because INR was not telling him what he wanted to hear ... I was intercepted at the door of his office and told, 'The Undersecretary doesn't need you to attend this meeting anymore.'" According to former coworkers, Bolton withheld information that ran counter to his goals from Secretary of State Colin Powell on multiple occasions, and from Powell's successor Condoleezza Rice on at least one occasion.[36]
In 2002, Bolton accused Cuba of transfers of biological weapons technology to rogue states and called on it "to fully comply with all of its obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention."[37] According to a Scripps Howard News Service article, Bolton "wanted to say that Cuba had a biological weapons capacity and that it was exporting it to other nations. The intelligence analysts seemed to want to limit the assessment to a declaration that Cuba 'could' develop such weapons."[38] According to AlterNet, a progressive/liberal activist news service, Bolton attempted to have the chief bioweapons analyst in the State Department's bureau of intelligence and research and the CIA's national intelligence officer for Latin America reassigned. Under oath at his Senate hearings for confirmation as Ambassador, he denied trying to have the men fired, but seven intelligence officials contradicted him.[26] Ultimately, "intelligence officials refused to allow Bolton to make the harsh criticism of Cuba he sought to deliver,"[38] and were able to keep their positions. Bolton claims that the issue was procedural rather than related to the content of his speech and that the officers, who did not work under him, behaved unprofessionally.[citation needed]
Bolton is alleged by Democratic Congressman Henry Waxman to have played a role in encouraging the inclusion of statement that British Intelligence had determined Iraq attempted to procure yellowcake uranium from Niger in Bush's 2003 State of the Union Address.[39] These statements were claimed by critics of the President to be partly based on documents later found to be forged.[40] Waxman's allegations have no visible means of support as they are based on classified documents.[39]
Bolton is alleged by the Knight Ridder news agency to have been scheduled to tell the House of Representatives International Relations subcommittee that Syria's development of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons had progressed to such a point that they posed a threat to stability in the region. Knight Ridder reported that Bolton’s appearance was cancelled after CIA and other intelligence agencies said that assessment was exaggerated.[citation needed]
Bolton claimed that Iran and Syria were threatening the world with weapons of mass destruction, an allegation that was denied by the CIA. Bolton has also made threats against Iran. In a 2006 speech to AIPAC, Bolton threatened Iran with "painful consequences" if that country did not yield to Washington demands that it shut down all its nuclear programs. Bolton's actions at the United Nations Security Council were controversial. During and after Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 2006, he consistently blocked efforts to adopt a ceasefire. He rejected criticism of Israel's bombing of Lebanon and claimed that there is "no moral equivalence" between Lebanese civilians killed accidentally by Israel retaliation attacks and Israelis killed by "malicious terrorist acts".[citation needed]
Bolton stated in June 2004 congressional testimony Iran was lying about enriched uranium contamination: "Another unmistakable indicator of Iran's intentions is the pattern of repeatedly lying to ... the IAEA, ... when evidence of uranium enriched to 36 percent was found, it attributed this to contamination from imported centrifuge parts." However, later isotope analysis supported Iran’s explanation of foreign contamination for most of the observed enriched uranium.[41] At their August 2005 meeting the IAEA's Board of Governors concluded: "Based on the information currently available to the Agency, the results of that analysis tend, on balance, to support Iran’s statement about the foreign origin of most of the observed HEU contamination."[42]. Bolton has authored a new book titled Surrender Is Not an Option. In his book Bolton criticizes the Bush administration for changing its foreign policy objectives during the start of the administration's second term.[43]
In 2006 a politician from Sweden's Liberal Party nominated Bolton for the Nobel Peace Prize[44]. The prize later went to Muhammad Yunus and Grameen Bank "for advancing economic and social opportunities for the poor, especially women, through their pioneering microcredit work".[45]
On May 28, 2008, the British activist George Monbiot attempted to make a citizen's arrest of Bolton, for his role as an architect of the Iraq War at the Hay Festival of Literature & Arts in Hay-on-Wye, Wales. The attempt was unsuccessful, and Monbiot was ejected by security personnel.[46]...
...A member of the Project for the New American Century, Bolton was also one of the signers of the January 26, 1998 PNAC letter sent to President Bill Clinton urging him to remove Saddam Hussein from power using U.S. diplomatic, political and military power. The letter also stated "American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council."...UNQUOTE
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Bolton
These profiteering war families never go away.
TJ
Bolton, yet another piece of human garbage.
If Obamageddon wants to impress me, he would order the dismantling of all but one thousand nukes. Then challenge all nuke possessing countries to match the USA with a proportional reduction.
I find it amazing that this article talks about what needs to be done to make the world safer from nuclear weapons and neglects to mention Israel. It talks about India,Russia,Pakistan,North Korea and Iran. Apparently, Iran is an important threat. Israel? Not even a mention. Very curious indeed.
My first impression as well. What about a nuclear-armed rogue terrorist state that even got away with attacking a US naval vessel and strafing the survivors? Wasn't that an act of war - or did the Zionists threaten nuclear retaliation if the US objected - or even told the world about the 'incident' - once a terrorist, always a terrorist, especially if you're a psychopath.
Me? I'm more worried about those Israeli nukes.
Bolton's loyalty is to zionism, not to US.
The difference being?
Nation states allegiances are so 100 years ago......
Planet earth and human beings. Check it out. It's the way of the future!
It is remarkable that those who did not join the military, or opted to avoid it by joining th national guards, are most willing to risk or engage in war.
Two things:
Why is John Bolton complaining about o's nuclear policies?
Why is William Hartung claiming the o is fighting nuclear proliferation and is trying to reduce our nuclear arsenal?
Have people NOT paid attention when o, in January of this year, increase by 10% the budget on america's nuclear arsenal? Well?
http://rawstory.com/2010/01/pledging-reverse-spread-obama-seeks-surge-nuclear-weapons-spending/
Or
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1247049/Nobel-Peace-Prize-winner-Barack-Obama-ups-spending-nuclear-weapons-George-Bush.html
Good points samosamo--We should also ask why Hartung states that Iran is working on building nuclear weapons when there is no evidence of that.
There should be a place for men like Bolton, and Judge Bjork, who are awarded "Anachronism of the Year", like in a zoo, where people can visit.
Bolton is one "Gepetto gone bonkers."
"Oh, Pinoccio! Ve must bomb dem beforrr dey bomb us!"
(LOL)
Now we know where all the people went when they closed the asylums...