Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Moyers Legacy
Even in an age of old-media uncertainty, much is still made of the
transfer of network anchor and host positions. Too often the discussion
is purely about personality, but there's more to it than a celebrity
shuffle: the character and content of programs with rich histories and
the potential for crucial contributions to civic discourse are at stake.
So oceans of ink are spilled when CBS shifts the news anchor chair from
Dan Rather to Bob Schieffer to Katie Couric; or when Tim Russert's
Meet the Press post goes to David Gregory. Unfortunately, scant
attention has been paid to the coming shift of what over the past decade
has become the most significant seat in broadcast journalism--the Friday
night position occsupied by Bill Moyers.
Moyers has been the most radical presence on broadcast and cable television since 2002, when the former White House press secretary, newspaper publisher, CBS and NBC commentator, bestselling author and award-winning documentarian settled into the work of producing weekly reviews not of the transitory arguments of the moment but of the great debates on the fate of the Republic. What has made Moyers, who will retire in April, such a radical presence is not his politics but his journalism.
As the host of NOW With Bill Moyers, Moyers on America and, since 2007, Bill Moyers Journal, he has provided an antidote to the blather served up by most news and public affairs programs. Never satisfied to practice stenography to power, as so many news programs do, or to moderate recitations of talking points by political hacks, Moyers refuses to treat Americans as imbeciles who need to be ideologically coddled.
Moyers has always chosen his guests with a purpose: to put new ideas, new analyses, new approaches on the table when most outlets invite talking-head insiders to narrow the range of options. So he has earned the ire of the political and corporate elites who benefit most from a constrained debate as he has cultivated an oasis for outliers who offer unbought and unbossed takes on wars of whim, executive excess, economic wrongdoing and, above all, the corruption of politics.
This has made Moyers, whose pronouncements in recent years have celebrated the populist and progressive reformers of a century ago, a tribune for some of the most insightful progressive thinkers of our time, including Barbara Ehrenreich, Lawrence Lessig, Glenn Greenwald, Michael Pollan, Nikki Giovanni, Roberto Lovato and George Soros.
But Moyers was never satisfied to push the ideological boundary to the left; he also pushed to the right. During the Bush/Cheney years, he hosted not only liberal and progressive critics of the administration (including editors and writers from this magazine) but also conservatives like Richard Viguerie, Cal Thomas and Ron Paul, the Texas Republican the host famously introduced, with a reference to Paul's warnings about the folly of invading Iraq, as "a man who was right when no one listened."
Indeed, while other media outlets portrayed the mid-2000s as a time of simplistic partisan positioning, Moyers viewers were among the first to learn that true conservatives were angry with the GOP administration's excessive spending and disregard for the Constitution. And then, after Barack Obama took office, Moyers began to highlight criticisms from the left and right of the Democratic president's Wall Street-friendly economic policies and unfulfilled promises on torture and transparency.
This delight in dissent from conventional wisdom--from wherever it may come on the political spectrum--made Moyers a worthy successor to the late William F. Buckley, whose 1966-99 program, Firing Line, was similarly adventurous when it came to challenging compromised decision-makers and compromised journalism. A man of the mainstream right, Buckley invited onto his show libertarians and socialists, Margaret Thatcher and Jesse Jackson, Ronald Reagan and Noam Chomsky, Milton Friedman and John Kenneth Galbraith. Just as Firing Line mattered, not merely because of the topics but because of the liveliness and intelligence of the discussion, so watching Moyers has mattered.
The question is whether what comes next will matter. PBS plans to replace Bill Moyers Journal with a public affairs program featuring a new format. Whoever fills the slot will no doubt do things differently, which is to be expected. But it's crucial that a forum be maintained for those with dissenting views--on the left and the right--and for those who are ready to toss aside talking points and wrestle honestly with the great issues of the day. Moyers has created a necessary forum, as did Buckley before him. To lose it would be disastrous, not just for PBS and broadcast television but for our Republic, which can ill afford the hollow hectoring and pointless positioning that passes for debate on TV programs that in entire seasons don't say as much as Bill Moyers does in a single show.
- Posted in



64 Comments so far
Show AllBill Moyers has done some real journalism over there.. I have no idea what will replace him, but it is my sincere hope they find a real journalist, like Amy Goodman or Glenn Greenwald to fill that chair.
I think Amy or Glenn would be great. So would Jeff Cohen or Robert Jensen. Or Craig Brown, CD editor. Or David Swanson. Or Matt Rothschild. Or KVH. I hope PBS is motivated for maintaining a slot for hearing progressive voices.
*Comment deleted by site administrators for violating our Comment Policy*
see: http://www.commondreams.org/comment-policy
Moyers, like the late Molly Ivins, is irreplaceable. His absence will be felt deeply.
I couldn't agree more. Moyers was a lone voice in the wilderness and a masterful interviewer. I will sorely miss his in-depth discussions of the issues every week. So long, Bill, it's been fun!
I agree! I still miss the "bite" of the Molly Ivins columns! She was absolutely fearless!
As for Bill Moyers, I watch him EVERY Friday night -- without fail. Not only does he cover the news, and countless controversial issues, but he also brings us the best of the arts!
I also watch David Brancaccio, and I hear that his program will be taken off the air, too.
Every morning, I watch Amy Goodman -- I stream Democracy Now! on my computer. If I have to miss the program, I feel completely disconnected form the world. Most days, as soon as the program ends, I go to Salon.com to read Glenn Greenwald.
On Mondays, prior to watching Amy and Juan, I travel to truthdig for Chris Hedges. Truthdig posts their articles by about 6:30 AM -- one of the few websites to be up-and-running that early.
Therefore, we do have some good journalists, but we are certainly losing some very important journalists, and progressive programming as well.
Ditto
Moyers is the Last Broadcast Journalist. He cannot be replaced.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Correction: Moyers is probably the last great broadcast TV journalist. Amy Goodman is of his calibre only she works on radio. Most of the best journalism in America is now indie or alt radio.
"which can ill afford the hollow hectoring and pointless positioning that passes for debate on TV programs..."
Good thing the Nation, that bourgeoisie magazine, has "pointless positioning" sewn up.
Evidently The George W. Bush Foundation will be the funder and supporter of the Public Affairs programs for PBS. At least that is what I read in one of those small, aside items in a reputable news magazine several months ago.
Say it isn't so, and I'll feel very relieved.
/cm
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Unfortunately you are correct and the show PBS is preparing with under the Shrubbery's aegis will probably be in Moyer's or Brancaccio's old slot(s).
If this is true, I find this the scariest scenario of all. No reasonable and intelligent replacement could ever be funded by such a "foundation." We'd just be further subjected to apologists for the big money interests which now rule us. Did Moyers really retire, or was he forced out?
Let's not pretend William F. Buckley was Moyers though. He did have on many diverse guests, but that's where the comparison ends. The man was an intellectual gnome by comparison. There are many online interviews available for viewing that reveal the vacuousness and pretension of his mind. In the Chomsky one he reveals his alternating hilarious smugness and bullying self righteousness. Check them out and see.
With the exodus of Bill Moyers, we are indeed experiencing "the end of an era."
We are now in an era wherein money always speaks much louder than words and intellectual, rational thinking.
At 66, I'm deeply grateful that I had the opportunity to be exposed for so long to such rational and insightful thinking as was broadcast in the past on public broadcasting stations!
Nothing will ever cause me to stray from this kind of reasoning. But we are now in an age where many have not had the advantages we older folks have had.
I feel sorry for them, as they are forced to listen to the drivel of the politicians and, even worse, their sloppy irrational thought lines like: "Are we creating a country of hobos?" (Can you even imagine something that inane being spoken in public, let alone by someone in high public office???)
The people who are "running our country" and their ennablers are caught in a web of financial duplicity, all the while more deeply entrenching themselves in corruption and dishonesty. The television industry (including the public broadcasting stations) has obviously fallen into the same craven miasma.
History is, however, cyclical and I am happy and thankful I was able to experience the wonderful years of growth and clear-thinking in the news idustry which publicized such intelligent thinkers as Bill Moyers. He will be greatly missed. His like is nowhere to be found today in broadcasting.
My only sadness, as the cycle continues, is imagining all the pain, suffering, and angst people will have to "grow through" before another Bill Moyers emerges and is invited to publicly share thoughtful and meaningful dialogue with the American public.
Well said, Frank
One Marxist said "it is my sincere hope they find a real journalist, like Amy Goodman or Glenn Greenwald to fill that chair."
I'd add a few more to that list: John Pilger, Greg Palast, David Barsamian, and Robert Jensen to name a few. Funny how we almost never see anything by them on CD anymore. I guess they don't have anything to say, or?
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Yep. Ever since that Playgirl centerfold Scott Brown won Ted Kennedy's 40 year old Senate seat the Obama apologists have proliferated and Pilger, Palast, Jensen, Chomsky and Fisk have been downplayed.
-"Moyers has been the most radical presence on broadcast and cable television since 2002"
Radical? why because he highlighted Obama's adoption of bush's constitution shredding policies? Because he made the rest of the media look like PR firms? Because he told the stories of the plight of ordinary Americans? Yeah I guess that is radical in America.
Who will replace him? Whoever the corporate sponsors of your *public* pbs want, I guess. You guys spend cents on the dollar, a tiny fraction of your taxes compared to countries like UK and Germany, for public broadcasting. Compared to the public broadcasters of the advanced democracies, PBS is a joke. You get what you pay for.
Before PBS there was something called NET, (National Educational Television) which had zero corporate sponsorship. It was fully funded by government.
But remember, Moyers was the post-JFK reactionary shill for LBJ, with Rather, Schieffer, Jennings, Lehrer AND MacNeil all having benefitted from Being THERE at the assassination/coup; and who heads up "our" current lackluster "antiwar" movement against the BushCompany, LBJ attorney general Ramsey Clark. (And Texas belle Ivins never did more than bon mot). No progress? No WONDER!
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Jennings didn't become one of the anchor team on ABC's evening news until 1965. Moyers, as RFK, went through profound changes in their world views and politics over the course of their lives. Some people do actually evolve over time. Rather was always a bit of a get. MacNeil was better than Lehrer (who is now so calcified he might as well be a stalactite). Schieffer is too personally cozy with the Shrubbery back in Texas. Ramsey Clark has been extremely outspoken against the neo-cons and almost as seamlessly blacklisted from the "mainstream media" as Scott Ritter. Molly Ivins spent most of her years focused on Texas State-level politics but was still hilarious and incisive in her critiques of national political figures.
Agreed jlocke123.
Feel good liberalism at best.
It just gets worse and worser.
-30-
That Moyers is considered "radical" illustrates the truth of Chomsky's observation: The System safely allows and even encourages the most vigorous criticism from the far left of the spectrum because the bounds of the spectrum itself are fully controlled by System propaganda.
Thanks, Rich. I should have remembered that I could look up the quote online.
Agreed on Moyers's politics...he's said enough daring things that I'd almost give him credit for being an actual leftist, albeit only a mild one.
wow. I'm almost (almost :-) speechless that you remember it was me, Rich! That's one of my all-time favorite quotes, for sure. If all priests were like him, or even just his fellow Jesuits, I might have stayed a RC longer, who knows.
Here's another, apropos Chomsky's thesis...and from another priest, interestingly enough, albeit a Zen one. Have you heard it?
"To give your sheep or cow a large, spacious meadow is the way to control him."
Suzuki Shunryu roshi (1904 - 1971)
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Among old school New Deal-influenced liberals there are two main types: Those who wil publicly acknowledge their respect for the ideas of the old American socialists who influenced FDR, and those who would never publicly do so even though they would vote for (and take credit for) programs based on socialist ideas or principles. Moyers was of the first type and now that he is leaving I'll wager you will hear no more quotations of famous old socialists, let alone see any of them interviewed on American PBS or fully commercial network television.
My favorite quote of an old reformed socialist democrat cited on air by Bill Moyers:
"We must always question the socialist's answers, but we must always be asking the socialist's questions."
God, I hate to imagine the day when Chomsky leaves this earth, the world will have lost one of our greatest minds.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
But the System's broadcast TV media does not allow or encourage vigorous criticism from the far Left of the spectrum, although the bounds of the spectrum itself are fully controlled by System propaganda.
As a sometime viewer of American news, Bill Moyers Journal has always provided a reassuring sense that there are at least some clear-thinking Americans who are not mired in narrow-minded ideology.
When he retires, I invite him to Canada to help bring the same sensible features of his program to our public broadcaster which has been hijacked by the same glitzy production quality as many of the mainstream 24 hour news channels.
I cannot believe that Moyers is considered radical. It is sad when common sense and believing in what is best for all people is considered radical. Well, paint me radical then -- if that's the case.
"It's sad to me that such a basic thing as the principled opposition to coercion is considered to be extremist, unreasonable, unrealistic. Why do I have to believe in permanent peace to oppose war? How is it utopian to denounce force?" -B. K. Marcus
I'm radical too...
Ray Berthiaume
I guess we'll just have to tune in to Al-Jazeera.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Piss off.
Although I enjoyed Moyer's show, I can't really agree that he was 'radical' in his views. A devout Christian, Moyers received a bachelor of divinity, which may be part of the reason he stayed on TV so long.
Now, being a devout christian dosen't necessariy have a negative connotation, but I remember in several of his shows where his religion got in the way of objectivism.
Still, he will be missed as the one interviewer on mainstream media that did ask some tough questions. For my money though, if it was Amy Goodman, Greg Palast, John Pilger or Chris Hedges asking those questions, the interviewees would have been shaking in their boots.
In our household, the last rationale for having a tv, with all its blathering and 2-year-old ads, is gone. Truth is found by going to some of the web shows, like Democracy Now, Common Dreams and Truthout
"a man who was right when no one listened."
This statement by Moyers was an insult to those who did listen, especially Scott Ritter.
Ritter wasn't a listener, Ritter was another man who was right when no one listened.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Moyers meant no one in the media and political establishment, and most in the brainwashed general public. Remember, this was when American public approval of Bush's bait & switch from Afghanistan to the invasion of Iraq was at 70%.
I agree with commenters above that several people like Goodman, Pilger, Palast and Greenwald would be worthy successors to Moyers, which is practically a guarantee that none of these will be selected by PBS. More than likely, they will follow their recent proclivity to water down anything approaching a progressive content to their programming. Their demotion of NOW from an hour to a half hour show was only the beginning. Much as I personally love Bill Moyers Journal, it has (in most episodes) an all-too Charlie Rose-ish format of a dry sit-down talk show that will turn off the elders (most of us I suspect) who have trouble staying awake after 9 PM on a Friday night; and the younger crowd of folks headed out for their evening's entertainments. So our little Friday night oasis of true Journalism on TV is about to dry up. Sad. But maybe Bill Moyers in retirement may yet be a force on the national political scene. I'd see him a welcome addition to either entry in a presidential ticket, especially a progressive third party one. Wouldn't you really trust this man more than you would the ever-pliable Michael Moore or Howard Dean?
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
I would definitely vote for Moyers if he ran for the presidency and I do believe he would be far superior to either Michael Moore or Howard Dean. We should be so lucky. However, a lot of the Establishment old guard hate Moyers for coming out so strongly against the Vietnam War after LBJ was out of office and his life would be under constant serious threat because he is closer to a New Deal Democrat than any other living public figure of whom I am aware.
yes Bill Moyers does tell the truth from time to time. but then PBS is owned by Cargill and Arthur Daniel Midland.. and other big sponsors...
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
PBS is not owned by any corporate sponsor. Those corporations sponsor individual programs on the PBS line-up but not ALL of them.
I have not had access to television for a long time but a great Moyers quote is;"News is what they don't want you to know,every thing else is just publicity."
peace
That actually is a paraphrase of "news is what somebody somewhere wants to suppress; all the rest is advertising", said by a British newspaper tycoon, Lord Northcliffe (d. 1922) (I was going to use the conventional term "newspaper baron", but I couldn't quite bring myself to, since he was actually given a viscounty)
I suppose that Buckley Jr had at times an "intelligent" conversation with his guests. But I'll never forget the episode where he had a college professor who taught Central America history who tried to argue on behalf of the poor and the Indians who were being massacred in that part of the world by US friendly dictators.
Buckley Jr. kept interrupting the good professor to make the point over and over again, with the same glee and enthusiasm you expect to see in a serial killer, about how great would it be if, for example, the US would declare El Salvador the 51st state so US troops could be send down there to take care of the "communist" problem once and for all.
I'm afraid the Nations Editors are being way too kind to William.
There could hardly be a more enthusiastic supporter of Bill Moyers and his brand of journalism then me, that is, until he conducted his interview with Judge Goldstone, and his report on the conflict in Gaza. In that telling interview, Bill Moyers surrendered his journalistic integrity to a powerful special interest, and betrayed those of us who believed he had the courage and moral backbone to allow the facts and truth to be fully exposed for all to see. Instead, everything from his aggressive body language to the questions that came right from the propaganda talking points of the Israeli apologists, left me saddened that this once great journalist had sold out those of us who looked to him as a beacon of truth.
How true!!! I pretty much fell to the floor while watching Moyers' interview of Goldstone. To the letter Moyers acted like the classic American journalist Israel apologist. Or Israel agoniste, like Lewis Lapham likes to say.
What a dissapointment that was. I mean, truly, we Palestinians have been caught in a Twilight Zone which is simply impossible to escape.
Who can we trust to frame the Israel-Palestine debate within the context of international law instead of Israel's bogus "security" concerns?
Chomsky? Some obscure left wing magazine? Same old, same old?
The whole thing is so hopeless, so hopeless.
bluecurl3:
That does not surprise me at all. Moyers talked with author Salman Rushdie and words like fundamentalism, radical Islam, jihad, madarasses came up throughout the interview but the words I did not hear during that interview were Palestine, Kashmir, the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. Moyers is OK, but I'm not going to put him on a pedestal.
This is one of Bill Moyers's favorite poems, by his friend James A. Autry. It tells us who he is, and about his childhood.
COMMUNICATION
Now we dial the phone
but Aunt Callie still yells into it
and ends every sentence with a question mark
as if she can't believe that all her words
can get through those little wires
But back then we stepped out and pointed our voices
across the hills
Whooooeeee
It would follow the bottoms and up the next hill
and in a few minutes
it would come back from Cousin Lester
Whooooeeee
When there was trouble
Uncle Vee would blow the fox horn
or ring the dinnerbell
and someone with a car would come
not knowing the problem but that we needed a car.
When Uncle Vee yelled or blew the horn
there was a message to send.
Don't you boys be out there
yellin' up somebody
'less you got somethin' they need to know
But we'd yell
and the old folks would know we were just yelling
and let it go
our high voices somehow falling short of the next hill
the dogs not even coming from under the porch.
Weeks would pass without a real yell
then it would roll up the hill from Cousin Lester's
Whoooooeeeeee
And Uncle Vee would step out on the porch
and cup his hands and answer
and turn his head and listen
nodding at the message I could never understand.
It's how we heard Cousin Lottie got snake bit
and James Louis came back from the Pacific
It's how the fox hunts were arranged
and the hog killings set
They yelled about babies being born and people cured
about fires and broken bones and cows loose and dogs lost
the words always short and spaced
for the distance they had to travel.
Now there are the wires
and Aunt Callie still yells for the distance
and looks at the phone
holding it so her eyes can aim the words
through the instrument and across the hills
where they are to go.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
It's hard to believe the remnants of that era ended as recently as the late 1950s and very early 1960s. The era of the mule and the cooperative hog butchering.