Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Lobbyists Retreat but Never Surrender
George Washington's birthday is approaching and with it will come the attendant mythology: hatchet and cherry tree, wooden teeth, throwing a silver dollar across the Potomac River - or the Rappahannock.
Of course, as the old joke goes, a dollar went a lot further then. Today, if you tried to hurl a silver dollar across the Potomac, chances are some member of Congress would snatch it in flight like one of those nature film grizzly bears grabbing a salmon in mid-leap.
And the more likely person doing the throwing would be a lobbyist, tossing coins in the air to keep the playful legislator's attention. The other day, the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics reported that more than 15,600 companies spent at least $3.2 billion on federal lobbying last year. Five hundred thirty-five members of the House and Senate, more than 13,000 registered lobbyists in DC - you do the math.
This week, White House Special Counsel Norm Eisen blogged about President Obama's plans to further crack down on lobbyists by updating the Lobbying Disclosure Act and getting Congress to mandate "low-dollar limits on the contributions lobbyists may bundle or make to candidates for federal office," bundling being that insidious practice by which you raise a lot of money by hitting up a number of people for contributions and "bundling" their donations together.
Good luck with that, Norm. As we've seen, lobbyists are brilliantly devious at figuring out ways into the inner sanctums, and whoever's behind the door tends to welcome them with open arms, as long as they've arrived with the secret password - "Cash."
Example: last weekend, both Democratic and Republican members of Congress held retreats, ostensibly to go away some place and sagely contemplate their navels, discussing issues and plotting strategy. Guess who else was there?
The House Republican Caucus chose to stay near Washington at the Renaissance Baltimore Harborplace Hotel, all the easier for lobbyists to make a quick sprint up Interstate 95 and pitch woo. Among those addressing the Caucus were President Obama - you've seen the video of his give-and-take with them last Friday - and the ubiquitous former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, the GOP equivalent of a rash that won't go away.
The meeting was organized by the Congressional Institute, which describes itself as "a not-for-profit corporation dedicated to helping Members of Congress better serve their constituents and helping their constituents better understand the operations of the national legislature." It holds seminars for legislators and their staffs, publishes a handbook on floor procedure and sponsors the annual Congressional Art Competition.
The reality, as the Center for Media and Democracy's SourceWatch Web site reports, is that the Congressional Institute is "funded by corporate contributions and run by top Republican lobbyists."
Twelve of its 14 board members are registered lobbyists, including its chair, Daniel Meyer of The Duberstein Group, a lobby firm founded by former Reagan chief of staff Ken Duberstein; vice chair Barbara Morris-Lent, who has been a consultant to Verizon and is the wife of former Republican Congressman Norman Lent; and its secretary Gary Andres, a columnist for Rupert Murdoch's right-wing Weekly Standard and vice president of public policy and research for the lobby company Dutko Worldwide. Many of them are former Republican congressional staff members; two of them worked for ex-Speaker Gingrich.
A list of the Congressional Institute's financial contributors reads like a Who's Who of corporate America: among them have been General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Time Warner, UPS, Merck and tobacco giant Altria.
Lee Fang, a researcher for the progressive Center for American Progress Action Fund, paid a visit on the Republicans at their Baltimore hotel. In the time before Congressional Institute representatives told him to scram or face arrest, he found out quite a lot.
The aforementioned Dan Meyer was on his way to the retreat - his Duberstein clients include Goldman Sachs, BP, HealthNet and AHIP, the health insurance industry trade group that fought tooth and nail against the public option in the health care fight.
Also in attendance, according to Fang, was Institute board member Michael Johnson. A lobbyist at the OB-C Group, Johnson "touts himself as a 'Republican heavyweight' whose firm represents the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, JPMorgan Chase, and the health insurance giant WellPoint." And as he was pointed to the exit, Fang spotted John Sampson, chief lobbyist for Microsoft.
Meanwhile, Democrats chose to bask in sunnier climes, and some select lobbyists decided to grab their towels and Jamba Juice and enjoy the balmy weather with them. A dozen senators headlined the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's winter retreat at a Ritz Carlton resort in Miami Beach, a cozy little hideaway with 375 guest rooms, "sumptuous" marble baths, spa and a $2 million dollar art collection.
The senators included DSCC chair Robert Menendez, Carl Levin, Frank Lautenberg, Claire McCaskill and Bernie Sanders. Riding in the wake of their surf were 108 lobbyists - special guests who shared meals, receptions and "informal conversations" with the legislators.
According to the Web site Politico.com, among those attending were "top lobbying officials for many of the industries Democrats regularly attack: Represented were the American Bankers Association, the tobacco company Altria, the oil company Marathon, several drug manufacturers, the defense contractor Lockheed, and most of the large independent lobbying firms."
The price of admittance wasn't released but the maximum contribution to the DSCC for similar events is $30,000 a head. Interesting when compared to recent remarks by Senator Menendez. Politico's Ben Smith quoted a January 27 Menendez press release: "In the upcoming elections, voters will face a choice between Republicans who are standing with Wall Street fat cats, bankers and insurance companies - or Democrats who are working hard to clean up the mess we inherited by putting the people's interests ahead of the special interests."
Hearing all this makes me think we should stage a national intervention and ship the entire 111th Congress off to a different kind of retreat, a sort of political rehab facility. They would be kept isolated from lobbyists and special interests for as many weeks as it takes for them to be weaned from money and pork and made to pay attention to the needs of their constituents - and the nation.
There would be lectures, motivational speakers, readings from the Federalist Papers, and daily screenings of "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington." And emblazoned across its entryway would be a denunciation of money and politics, Thomas Jefferson's 1816 battle cry to "crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
I know it's just a fantasy, but I feel better already.




21 Comments so far
Show AllFor that fantasy retreat Winship muses about, we could utilize one of those concentration camps (U.S. Relocation Centers) built under FEMA and the REX 84 Program. (Just Google or Bing US Concentration Camps). Might as well get some use out of them.
Gary
"Thought: The bottles are another great reminder of the confinement that pervades the novel – embryos are literally bottled, but metaphorically the citizens are trapped inside boundaries set by the World Controllers."
-- Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
If the unemployed would go camp out in DC like they did in 1932 Congress and Obama might feel some pressure to push a progressive agenda rather than to just send the unemployed their unemployment insurance checks and food stamps, while continuing to gun for the corporations.
No, what would happen is they'd be quickly swept away by "law enforcement." The homeless have tried that here a few times and have been swiftly swept out of sight. Much as I would love it if "People Power" could work here, the forces we're up against are so huge and so well organized and connected up, I don't believe it would work. Anyone who'd care to prove me wrong is welcome to try and, if it looks like it's starting to go our way, I'm there.
Saw the Moyers show last night. Bill mentioned the above article as the parting segment and it came as no surprise.
As long as there is one lobbyist who can give money to elected officials so they can better compete in their campaign, there cannot be democracy in America.
Public funded elections now and forever. Of course, with the latest Supreme Court ruling on corporation funding, there will have to be new restrictions put on corporate TV commercials too, even if we get public funded elections.
America is following Alice down that rabbit hole faster and faster.
Lobbyists win because they're rich and most progressives and liberals are stupid losers who refuse to put pressure on Congress compared to the right wingers.
All right. Look. I admit that it's very difficult to pressure some members of Congress but it's not impossible. There's got to be a chance somewhere somehow. People were poor during the Great Depression and the rich people still had all the money to pressure Congress but it was the proud blue collared working class people who united and made FDR rise above strong opposition to Congress. I don't know how to get back to FDR style but I think progressive unity is very weak and Congress is tougher to pressure and the media is too powerful. Yeah, I'm addicted to the TV shows on the media like most Americans but I haven't given up the basics. I still think we have the power but we just don't know it or how to work it here.
I forgot to reply to you or Ephraim about the Nader thing. I don't remember which one of you said it but yeah, Gore didn't run a great campaign and he picked Lieberman and didn't fight the count well enough but Nader taking away 97,000 votes in FL could have been avoided had he not run. Nader was a great guy otherwise and I wished he would take the time to build a progressive party that we can turn to. I can't believe he's not trying.
Shawn -- Why don't you join in putting the Nader Florida thing to rest? First, blame the Supreme Court...Bush's "win" was a coup. Second, don't ignore the 250,000 Florida Democratic votes for Bush. Why don't you blame them for "giving it to Bush"? It would be logical (actually more logical considering the numbers.)
Implicit in your view is that Nader's candidacy wasn't as "legitimate" as that of the Democrats and Republicans. Why else would you ignore a count that buries his 97,000?
Arry, ok, I agree about the Supreme Court and Bush stealing but one thing I don't get is where did you get that 250,000 Florida Democrats number from? I saw the number of votes Nader actually got but do you have the source to the 250 thing?
I'll be back in the morning once I'm sober to see this and I got some thinking to do on RichM's recent reply. Thanks.
Let us not forget, as Greg Palast writes, "Jeb Bush's operation denied over 50,000 citizens their right to vote. Given that 80% of registered voters actually cast ballots in the presidential election, at least 40,000 votes were lost. By whom? ... We can confidently state that this little twist in the voter purge cost Al Gore a good 30,000 votes..."
And "Bush won more than 70% of Muslims who voted. In Florida, that totaled 55,000 people, who, according to an exit poll by the Tampa Bay Islamic Center, favored Bush over Gore by 20 to 1. According to this exit poll, Bush got 88% of the vote to Gore's 4%, with 8% voting for Nader."
And "Nearly $14 million magically poured into the Bush/Cheney Florida recount effort - four times the amount raised by the Gore/Lieberman camp. The money flowed in so fast... that Bush campaign officials... were dumbfounded... The Bush campaign took in $13.8 million, most in large contributions. Listed among those large contributors were Bush and Cheney's two most reliable genies - Enron and Halliburton... As soon as a recount was announced, Bush forces moved quickly. Money was no object. They dispatched over 100 lawyers to Florida and Texas, booking hundreds of plane tickets, rental cars and hotel rooms. Among the expenditures listed was a payment of $13,000 to Enron Corp. and $2,400 to Halliburton Co. for the use of their corporate jets and other unspecified services...."
And Washington Post's Tom Edsall reports, "The Justice Department disclosed yesterday it will file suit in three Florida counties charging voting rights violations in the 2000 presidential election... [They] expect the counties and municipalities to admit wrongdoing and agree to take steps to prevent recurrences of problems in the 2002 elections... Boyd said the allegations include improper purges of voter rolls, 'disparate' treatment of minorities in the voting process, failures to provide required voter registration material in certain public places and inaccessible balloting for disabled voters. Boyd's announcement is the first formal action taken by the Bush administration to deal with the politically explosive controversies that surrounded the 2000 election in Florida...."
And on 7-15-01, NY Times reporters David Barstow and Don Van Natta Jr. documented how the Bush campaign pressured numerous Florida counties to count illegal overseas military ballots. A thorough statistical analysis of this data estimates that Bush gained 286 votes as a result of this massive fraud. Without those 286 illegal votes, the Florida Supreme Court would have declared Gore the winner on 12-8-00, when it overruled Katherine Harris and accepted the results of partial recounts from Palm Beach and Miami-Dade and cut Bush's lead to 154. These 286 votes also put Gore over the top in most of the media recount scenarios.
As for the Florida Bush Democrats: "Twelve percent of Florida Democrats (over 200,000) voted for Republican George Bush" -- -San Francisco Chronicle, Nov. 9, 2000
Now, tell us again how Nader cost Gore the election.
Gary
“Rather fail with honor than succeed by fraud.”
-- Sophocles
That's a lot of details but thanks. I guess that shows that Nader wasn't quite a spoiler in Florida than I had thought just because of his 97,000 votes he got. I'll keep this in mind.
If Bill Clinton had not passed NAFTA, sold the FCC down the river, killed Glass-Steagall, shifted welfare payments from citizens to corporations and fibbed about getting a blow job, Gore would have won (even with GI Joe on the ticket with him).
Clinton was far more responsible for Gore's loss than Nader was.
The "national intervention" is a great idea.
Failing that (and we will), we're left with three alternatives: Disobedience, Resistance and Revolt.
I won't feel better until the perp walks start on Capitol Hill.
The words rich and powerful people speak cause these to be enriched, those to be impoverished, these to survive in luxury, those to perish in destitution.
I think that the richly powerful people of this world should cease to speak ... forever and, for the sake of their immortal souls, should die pennyless.
How many people have been able to drill down deep enough ... to the core and shine the eye of their mind on the hands of the supremely powerful few who are working the levers of this world's fate?
We are being directed towards World War Three and the obliteration of human life on this planet.
This isn't going to happen.
On the contrary, a destiny of beginnings lies before us and a peace on earth and in a light that is eternal.
We have entered Humanity's Next Cycle.
Michael, do we know if Lee Fang got the names of any crotch candy?
As far back as 1965, and just out of a small Christian college, I was dispatched to locate chocolate eclairs for aldermen - on behalf of my Fortune 500 Employer - merely to defeat a lousy increase in the damn Water Rate, for a town in the Chicago suburbs. I stopped drinking the water.
Anybody else remember Spiro Agnew? He had a lot of common dreams.
Winship writes:
"Hearing all this makes me think we should stage a national intervention and ship the entire 111th Congress off to a different kind of retreat, a sort of political rehab facility."
I have a better idea. My suggestion would be that the entire 111th Congress be stripped naked, dipped in chocolate, sent by rickety boat to Haiti and then paraded through the streets of Port au Prince, single file, past the collapsed Palace and that big old Catholic Church where the High Priest was killed by God. Historically speaking, that would be justice.
As for whether the people of Haiti merely taunted them as they passed by, or tore them limb from limb, or licked the chocolate off them before rendering their fat on a spit, that would be their decision.
God has spoken to the people of Haiti.
Let (S)He now speak to us.
It is certain that the tendency of the Present cannot hold.
-30-
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/26604
Wish I had the confidence in the American people that the author did in calling for a new Constitutional Convention. But in the era of teabaggers I worry.
Gary
“It's interesting to witness the suppression and acceleration of voter turnout, depending on who's pulling the strings.”
-- Christie Donner
RichM writes:
"There are several big differences between the 1930's & the present, so one can't simply assume that what was done then, could be done today."
The old adage that "history repeats itself" is essentially dead. History is a fractal, and today we call it "progress."
Meanwhile, I generally admire your authentic and educational posts on CD.
Something just occurred to me as I was reviewing this. Try inverting:
"There are several big differences between the 1930's & the present, so one can't simply assume that what was NOT done then, could NOT be done today."
What if we CAN trust the weatherman but we just don't know who he is? Do we, Mr. Jones?
I like gdgoodman's erudition, too, by the way. What the hell, I'm a CD addict!
-30-