EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Wall Street Bonuses Can Create One Million Green Jobs
President Obama may be joining the populist crusade against Wall Street. In the span of one week he opened up a three front war: a tax on big banks, full support for a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency, and the embrace of Paul Volcker's plan to break up the big banks.
It's about time. Or has the time already passed?
Yes, there is enormous popular anger against Wall Street and the bailouts. However, the deepest anger is rooted in the enormous fears and hardships caused by the lack of jobs.
Obama is responding with a call for another stimulus in the form tax breaks for small businesses and for the weatherization of homes. Not good enough. The scale and scope of his proposals are unlikely to alleviate enough of the pain and suffering experienced by jobless Americans. Unfortunately, the Administration does not realize how deeply the crisis of employment is built into our billionaire bailout society.
So what should Obama do?
Declare a national jobs emergency. Then tie taxes on Wall Street's bonuses directly to job creation on Main Street. Make it simple. Make it fair. Make it fast.
Instead of taxing the banks through his proposed complex asset liability tax which most Americans really don't understand (and which will be lobbied into Swiss cheese), he should slap a windfall profits tax on the $150 billion record bonus pool, which every American can grasp. (Rep. Dennis Kucinich's bill for a 75 percent bonus tax is waiting for Obama's support.)
It's not hard to connect the dots: That bonus money comes directly and indirectly from taxpayer bailouts to Wall Street. That's our money. Take it back and create jobs with it.
At the same time, President Obama should announce the creation of a million-person weatherization corps to insulate every American home, business and public building. The energy efficiency benefits would be wonderful to reduce carbon emissions, global warming, and oil imports. (Do the math: 75 percent windfall profits tax on $150 billion bonus pool equals $112.5 billion. At $100,000 per job including benefits, administration and supplies, you could create more than one million green weatherization jobs.)
But the key is putting one million people to work on this vital national security task before November - that is before corporate donations unleashed by the Supreme Court make a mockery of elections.
Let's keep in mind how we got here. For thirty years the financial lobbyists and their willing partners in Congress and the White House engaged in an orgy of deregulation and tax reform, resulting in wealth accumulation in the hands of a few. So much money accumulated with the wealthy, that they literally ran out of investments in tangible assets in the real economy. Wall Street solved that problem by creating a menagerie of deregulated fantasy finance instruments that sucked up the surplus wealth and earned Wall Street more profits that ever before. (Summers and Geithner were avid cheerleaders for this process.)
The process of securitization and derivatives was creating an upside down pyramid of synthetic instruments leveraged on top of risky assets like subprime loans, which in turn created an enormous housing bubble. (And before that the dot.com bubble, the savings and loan crisis, and so on--it should be clear by now that we're dealing with a distended financial sector that inherently builds bubbles.)
The one clear plus was that the artificial housing bubble also created jobs in the housing supplies, construction, and financial industries, even as our manufacturing sector was dismantled piece by piece and moved to low-wage areas around the world. Average wages stagnated and declined, but Americans, overall, were working.
It's now clear that that these jobs and faux prosperity were built on financial rot. As soon as housing prices stopped rising, the entire upside down pyramid of leveraged assets came crashing down. The financial sector froze and threw the world economy to the brink of another Great Depression. The real economy, starved for credit, went into an immediate tailspin and unemployment shot through the roof. There are now nearly 30 million Americans without jobs or forced into part-time work.
The theory of recovery adopted both by the Bush and the Obama administrations was this: stabilize the financial sector with enormous bailouts to stop the financial implosion and provide stimulus bills to kick-start the real economy. This combination was supposed to lead to a rapid recovery both for financial assets (including our 401ks and pensions) and for the creation of real jobs.
It didn't quite work out that way. The financial sector, which is still living off an array of hidden government guarantees, asset purchases, and cheap money, is making enormous profits again. (If you want to see clearly how TARP is just a small part of the Wall Street bailout package, take your blood pressure pills and go look at Nomi Prins's excellent accounting). Meanwhile the real jobless rate is well over 17 percent.
And just to rub it so it really stings, Wall Street has the chutzpah to award itself a record bonus pool of $150 billion during the worst economic year since the Great Depression. This pool would be a negative number were it not for trillions of dollars of taxpayer welfare for Wall Street.
In our new billionaire bailout society, Wall Street's elites have the ability to restart its speculative money-making games without loaning money to Main Street's businesses. They have a slew of ways to game the system so that the federal money and support flows into their bonus pools. Loan making is still declining even as their profits rise, making a mockery of their role as distributors of capital to the real economy. It is highly questionable if these non-lending financial firms are producing any economic worth at all for our economy.
So Obama is stuck with a bailout and stimulus package that only half worked. At an enormous long-term cost, it may have succeeded to stabilize the financial system and to avoid another Great Depression, at least for now. But it failed to create sufficient jobs to make up for the crater in our economy created by Wall Street's speculative crash.
So he needs to directly put Americans to work unless he and the Democrats want to lose their jobs as well. Although the most efficient means to create one million weatherization jobs would be through direct public employment (like a new WPA), the anti-government mood requires that we use as many private contractors as possible. That kind of government funded/private contractor partnership should be able to cut through the ideological barriers because Americans will understand that employing people in useful jobs is fundamentally worthwhile. We need to save energy. We need work. And, we need to make the bankers, who so recently wrecked our economy, pay for it.
This will never happen unless the President stays on message every day. He also needs to act as if we were in a dire national jobs emergency, which we are.
It was telling to watch the President at his recent town hall meeting in Elyria, Ohio. Although the session was billed as a jobs event, he revealed his real concerns when he concluded with a call for health care reform and energy legislation. As important as those issues are to all of us, he'll never get there unless he focuses on jobs, jobs and more jobs until we are working again.
At the same time, the President should challenge the "do nothing" Republicans and their blue-dog Democratic cousins to put up or shut up on jobs. If they refuse to pass the needed legislation, the President should redirect unspent funds from other programs to combat the jobs emergency. No one will blame him for playing hard ball on jobs creation.
Is it realistic to create a million jobs in a short period of time? We'll never know unless someone tries. But if we limit ourselves to advocating only what seems realistic, here's the sickening reality that awaits us: bankers walking off with record bonuses during a year in which they nearly destroyed our economy, and during a year in which we bailed them out with trillions of dollars of taxpayer welfare.
It would be an important morale booster for the country to create green jobs - one million of them -by November.
Isn't that change we can believe in?
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


17 Comments so far
Show AllThe $14 trillion that Obama, Congress and Bernanke have committed to the bankster bailout could cover a comprehensive jobs program PLUS single-payer medical insurance for all 308 million Americans.
Wall Street Bonuses Can Create One Million Green Jobs or Bribe 100 Senators. Senators win!
Government can only create jobs in the goverrnmental sector or by tax and trade policies. They cannot create "jobs" We don't need a job's program for jobs that don't exist.
Till you reverse the tax and trade policies,restore the government regulations and laws that were removed over the last 15 years that brought us tio this sorruy state, yiou are watering the wind.
The republicans squandered the power we gave them on themselves, now the democrats are doing the same, but even worse under Obama. Till we return governance to the rule of law, equity of return for effort and take care of our least able, we are not America.
And its time people stood up and said they were Americans again. Refused to believe all the tripe about it makes no difference what we do or if we vote. The fact that it does is being illustrated for us at the moment.
nonsense
the myth that only private sector jobs count is completely false
the private sector , especially the industrial base is able to produce more goods that ever before with less labor
unless the government
A) makes these businesses provide jobs for all of us or
B) taxes these businesses and the provides jobs for all of us
there will be fewer and fewer jobs, and we will all spiral into poverty except a select few
djb
"the myth that only private sector jobs count is completely false"
I didn't say that only private sector jobs count, what I said was that government cannot "create" real jobs. Government jobs are all administrative.
I must disagree. Unless we become overnight, a dictatorship or a communist country like China, the government doesn't have the power to make these businesses provide jobs for all of us.
"taxes these businesses and the provides jobs for all of us"
Thats essentially been the California method. Hasn't worked out to well for them I think.
"there will be fewer and fewer jobs, and we will all spiral into poverty except a select few"
That is what has started. The only way government can help is to return Glass-Stegall as law. Change tax laws that reward speculation and moving jobs, business's and industries off shore. Restore tax laws that do not reward companies for ditching their workers or replacing them qwith foreign workers. Change trade policies like NAFTA that hurt the workers in every country and reward multi country corporations and banks.
The government is part of the partnership that has hurt Americans. I would rather not count on them to place American workers on the "dole"
Sioux Rose
CALIGULA: I lost the thread where you sent me to a former article. I want you to know that I did respond at length to your post in that earlier thread.
Souix Rose
Thats why I sent you back. I think you misunderstood my reply to another poster. I'll get it to you on another thread I'm sure.
Thanks young lady and I hope your man is doing well. Its very hard on the care giver.
Edit: I just read your posts. We mostly agree. I would note I was never a professional. I was drafted, the dirty %$#^@#*&&@)*^&'s! I served two tours , the second simply because I couldn't leave my men top inexpierenced people. Stayed in for another hitch just to do Embassy duty. Went to college at 26.
Your other may still be out there.
Pax
I remember reading various accounts of the CEO of Goldman Sachs over the last few months. He is a good example of what is wrong with our system. He is making $68 million a year plus perks and bonuses. He gave a pep talk to his executive team saying they were doing "God's work." His meaning was the loans their corporation was making stimulated the economy for everyone, but he came across as a delusional sociopathic white collar criminal that worshipped money. The obscene short term profits represented in these salaries and bonuses have been the driving force behind the wild speculation.
Fewer Wall Street giants now control most of the market share of loans nationwide. If they are to big to fail, they are monopolies and need to be divided up into component parts. Then the component parts that are directly involved in stimulating a recession, they MUST be pushed into bankruptcy to re organize and the assets of all those white collar criminals that profitted should be seized.
Average Americans are still being hammered by this recession and the banks/loan corporations bounced back with good profits. What's wrong with that picture?
it's too late, les, and won't happen, though it sure sounds good...(see chris hedges) ... such an article keeps us in slavery....
with new supreme court ruling he needs to play hard ball,
Here's a guy battling one of Wall Street's allies--collectors: "Cunningham calls himself a private attorney general—someone who files private lawsuits in the public interest. Debt collectors call him a credit terrorist."
http://www.dallasobserver.com/2010-01-21/news/better-off-deadbeat-craig-cunningham-has-a-simple-solution-for-getting-bill-collectors-off-his-back-he-sues-them/
I'm sure we all know someone who'd like to learn what this guy does so they can do it themselves.
It looks like the CD comment software is going to truncate the rather long URL, so after simple- you'll need to add this: solution-for-getting-bill-collectors-off-his-back-he-sues-them/
djb wrote, "the private sector , especially the industrial base is able to produce more goods that ever before with less labor..."
As a worker in the manufacturing sector, I'm not so sure that this is a significant cause of high unemployment.
1) We read about increased worker productivity, but that can be misleading. Rising corporate profits combined with stagnant or declining wages can create this illusion. And out-sourcing American jobs to slave-labor countries contributes even more to the higher-worker-productivity excuse.
2) OK, so maybe one robot can replace several assembly-line workers, but what happened to so many of the replacement jobs designing, building and programming those robots?
3) And then there is the fear factor. For example, my employer has had us restricted to a 4-day workweek for the past 7 months. But I still have deadlines. A number of times, I've taken work home to do on my "day off." (E-mailing unfinished spreadsheets to my PC at home then e-mailing them back to the office.) But I don't dare complain. People tell me, "Be grateful you have a job!"
On another issue, this morning I read some of the highlights of the President's plan to help out the middle class. I would not qualify for ANY of the proposed ideas. They all seem focused on 2-income households (or one-income households where the income-provider earns a lot more than I do--and can afford a family) or for those who can afford to buy certain things in order to get a tax credit. The single-income, displaced-worker (like me) households will just keep declining, I guess, as long as there is no job market to provide a choice of employment.
Fivecorners
An excellent post.
Your description of: "I've taken work home to do on my "day off." (E-mailing unfinished spreadsheets to my PC at home then e-mailing them back to the office.) But I don't dare complain. People tell me, "Be grateful you have a job!"
is exactly where big business wants the worker to be.
"I would not qualify for ANY of the proposed ideas. They all seem focused on 2-income households (or one-income households where the income-provider earns a lot more than I do--and can afford a family) or for those who can afford to buy certain things in order to get a tax credit. The single-income, displaced-worker (like me) households will just keep declining, I guess, as long as there is no job market to provide a choice of employment."
Here you hit on another problem. You don't make enough on one hand and you make too much on another for any help.
What they have done is plain. How to fix it seems plain to most people. But some still buy business's propaganda of "Globalization" and we are one world now. That our country should allow anothers exploited workers working for little or nothing to produce products and bring them here while penalizing any product made here. Its a great deal for the big corporations of the world.
Obama will continue the charade of a lot of nothing. He will never implement a real serious jobs program. He's going to keep handing out a pittance here, a pittance there, just enough to keep people treading water to avoid out and out revolt.
But it looks to me like Obama (Wall St) wants to keep unemployment high. They've already basically accepted 10% unemployment as the new normal. Even have the balls to call it a "jobless" recovery. The goal is to drive wages down. If they keep unemployment high, then Obama rams through immigration reform which will add another 11 million to the workforce. presto, they've turned the US into a source of cheap labor. Now that SCOTUS has opened the floodgates, multinationals will be governing this country from boardrooms, amd Wall Street will make a killing.
All of the actions taken in the last ten or fifteen years have not been by chance. These banking monsters have goals and by God, Obama's the man gonna take them across the finish line.
No, Obama is not 'joining a populist crusade against Wall St.' What he 'could' do and what he will do are nearly exact opposites. Being something of a weenie, I think BO could be pressured (this has certainly been proven anyway) if the populace finds a way to do it. But otherwise he's useless, just a boulder to walk around to get where we need to be.
Absolutely, a WPA-style jobs programs could work. There's a wonderful bridge at Whidbey Island, Washington built by the PWA in the '30s, still standing, still admired.
WPA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Works_Progress_Administration
PWA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Works_Administration
Deception Pass Bridge: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deception_Pass_Bridge
"So Obama is stuck with a bailout and stimulus package that only half worked."
What? You mean it actually worked at all for the average American? Come on Les.
He's right though.
Hey, I'm all for companies paying exorbitant amounts of moolah to CEO's, ball players, actors.
But tax it by at least 50% if not more.
And have the pay of average workers keep up with those of the bosses.
Call me crazy, but I think there should be a living wage of $880 a week for everyone, even if they sweep floors. That alone would solve a few problems.