Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama’s First Nine Months: Change We Can Believe In?
In the 2009 film The Messenger, we follow two officers from the Casualty Notification Office from Fort Dix, New Jersey as they knock on doors to inform relatives of loved ones recently killed in action in Iraq. These scenes are almost unbearable to watch as we witness the reactions to this heartbreaking news. It struck me that these emotionally affecting scenes on screen are as as close as most of us get to the grim reality of war.
With Obama's massive troop escalation (can the Nobel Peace Prize be rescinded?) he's made Afghanistan his war, reminiscent of President Johnson's Vietnam War escalation. At the current death rate of 500 soldiers per year the events depicted in the film will soon become a shattering reality for many more Americans. And next year Obama will spend some $65 billion on Afghanistan, more than for the Iraq war.Afghanistan, the "Graveyard of Empires," is this administration's most egregious failing and is now fated to define Obama's legacy. Beyond Afghanistian, maintaining permanent military bases and large garrisons in Iraq, allowing Israel to evade a just two state peace with the Palestinians, clandestine Blackwater (now Xe services) assassins roaming around Pakistan, the killing of hundreds of Pakistani civilians by CIA Predator drone attacks authorized by Obama early in his tenure, and a continuing U.S. military build-up in Colombia under the guise of a phony "war on drugs," also are on the list.
A one-year litany of domestic disappointments could be captured by a bumper sticker reading "the audacity of hopelessness." After handing over almost $3 trillion to bankers, we have a jobless "economic recovery," an official 10.2 percent unemployment rate which is actually 16.5 percent, the number of home foreclosures continues to rise and a country in which one in four children only manage to keep hunger pangs at bay because of food stamps and soup kitchens.In the face of this situation Obama's first stimulus package was pitifully small, and while it did "save" some jobs, it wasn't nearly enough for serious job creation. Obama's professed support for helping workers to unionize evaporated shortly after his inauguration. And under Obama's watch, as noted by New York Times columnist Bob Herbert, "Even as tens of millions of working Americans are struggling to hang onto their jobs and keep a roof over their families' heads, the wise guys of Wall Street are licking their fat-cat chops over yet another round of obscene multibillion dollar bonuses -- this time thanks to the bailout billions that were sent their way by Uncle Sam..."(10/20/09). The nine largest banks are distributing $32.6 billion in bonuses. But given the jobs crisis and depression-like situation confronting tens of millions of our fellow citizens, Obama found a record-breaking $664 billion for the Pentagon for fiscal 2010. Finally, Obama and many Democrats quickly abandoned government single payer national health insurance -- the only plausible solution to our healthcare crisis -- caving to the despicable, predatory, for-profit private health insurance lobbyists. (Note: These lobbyists gave $1.8 million to 18 key members of Congress).
For those who worked and voted for Obama, especially younger folks, all of this must be a bitter pill to swallow, a giant step backward toward disillusionment and cynicism. I prefer to interpret it as a necessary and valuable lesson in electoral illusions for those truly serious about making this a better country: Obama, a brilliant and charismatic politician, was always a conservative corporate Democrat, a self-described believer in "the free market," and an enthusiastic accommodator to the rich and powerful. In the words of one pundit, Obama is Clinton without the sleaze. He would never have been given a favorable vetting by the financial elites who chose our presidential candidates if he represented the slightest threat to their domestic interests and global empire. By the way, the latter includes 800 military bases in 130 countries.According to astute political analyst Paul Street, the Obama campaign set new corporate fundraising efforts, including nearly $1 million from Goldman Sachs. (I highly recommend Street's 2008 book Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics (Paradigm, 2008). In short, aside from some crafty rhetoric Obama was never a social justice populist and viewing him that way always contained a massive dose of wishful thinking. In that narrow sense, Obama has been entirely consistent and didn't really betray anyone.
More and more Americans are wise to the fact that because Democrats and Republicans are virtually indistinguishable on the issues that matter most, the "change we can believe it" will not be forthcoming from these two business parties.Short term we need a mobilized and vocal movement from below that dramatically increases the political costs for those resisting needed reforms. Longer term, we need systemic change, change in the class structure of capitalism. Until and unless workers who produce all the goods and services in our society participate in making the major economic policy decisions -- to run the economy democratically -- we will only be tinkering with a system that primarily serves those who own it. We need a new broad-based political party that actually responds to the genuine grievances and aspirations of ordinary working people and youth.
- Posted in



34 Comments so far
Show All"For those who worked and voted for Obama, especially younger folks, all of this must be a bitter pill to swallow, a giant step backward toward disillusionment and cynicism. "
Some of them I can forgive as they show themselves to have a heart on the issues and are willing to work on correcting the mistake of "voting for the lesser of the evils" but some of them are still hooked into being Obama apologists and that I show no respect for and will continue to classify them as no different from the Limbaugh dittoheads.
"More and more Americans are wise to the fact that because Democrats and Republicans are virtually indistinguishable on the issues that matter most, the "change we can believe it" will not be forthcoming from these two business parties."
And yet 99% of the voters picked between Mccain and Obama last year even when it was obvious. Unfortunately, such genuine wisdom has no place in politics and that should be obvious for someone with a PhD in political science. Instead, we have to shut up and "vote for the lesser of the two evils" or else. Whether people pick because of fear, blind loyalty, or whatever, until more people learn to actually vote on the issues and not on a candidate's party affiliation, there will be no real change to believe in other than believing in change for the worse.
Mccain or Obama, I saw a lot of this coming though I didn't anticipate it that fast and that bad. Still, I knew that we needed real leadership and that picking between the same old Wall $treet puppet parties was morally reprehensible.
So what do we do? Continue picking between Democrats and Republicans in 2010 and 2012 and reading more sorry articles or are we all ready to vote with our hearts and minds for new parties ready to put new ideas and even bring forth populist ideas similar to those of FDR?
I'm not afraid to continue discussing issues non-politically with my friends and family and doing my level best to convince them out of picking out of party affiliation.
And quit harping on Obama's Nobel Peace Prize. After giving Henry Kissinger a Nobel Peace prize, the Nobel Committee lost all credibility with all but the most delusional among us.
Obama should have been wearing his Nobel medal when he gave the speech at West Point this week.
In Orwellian doublespeak war=peace. Seems like the Nobel committee subscribes to that notion too.
When former congresswoman CYNTHIA MCKINNEY sat in an ISRAELI PRISON for a week after being arrested by arrogant ISRAELI naval kids in international waters.Mistreated and shown no respect by these teenage thugs and subjected to their gestapo behaviour,OBOMBA did and said NOTHING! I think the word "SLEASE" is quite fitting for this COWARDLY SYCHOPHANT AND WAR CRIMINAL.A DIMINISHED PRESIDENT,WHOSE MOUTH PIECE IS GATES AND HILLA.GATES HAS DECIDED TO ADD 3000 more troops to OBOMBA'S 30,000.HAS OBOMBA BEEN HUMILIATED YET BY THE POWER MONSTERS?
Former congresswoman CM because Aipac conspired against her and she was defeated.A direct result of the new york garden club women raising enormous amounts of money to fund her opponent and spreading camel shite to smeer her!HILLA STYLE LIES!
President Obama- Down the Rabbit Hole
President Obama used many clichés in his December 1st speech to West Point- especially concerning the greatness of America, our exceptionalism- how we seek to help rather than dominate. These words are empty- but so part of the standard vernacular, as to be safely ignored by anyone that knows even recent history.
However, the Presidency- as a position of great leadership- is often a test of moral courage. Moral courage is hard to define- but it boils downs to the ability to do what is right regardless of perceived cost to one's personal well being. It implies a willingness to accept risk and uncertainty, but also the confidence that by actively seeking the truth- good will emerge. Courage and idealism often go hand in hand.
President Obama has fallen into the trap of his predecessor. He has allowed the fear of something to cause him to take actions that are most likely to bring about what he fears most. At its root this is a lack of moral courage- a fear of being perceived weak and a fear that if things "go wrong," he will be blamed for the loss of lives.
His greatest fear is probably the fear of a chemical, biological or nuclear terrorist act. While this fear maybe justified, the question is whether his actions are driven by this fear or merely informed by it. Fear can trap us into old ways of thinking or it can help open up creative pathways that move beyond fear- to a pursuit of the truth.
To counter the fear of terrorism- there is in fact a need to bolster our security- and to do so in a way that is consistent with the law and the basic rights of individuals and groups. It is important not to bog down our police and intelligence operatives with excessive bureaucracy and indecision. It is important to work cooperatively with multiple organizations- domestically and abroad. It is important to stop the spread of lethal conventional and non-conventional weapons throughout the world.
However, even more importantly, we must recognize the causes of terrorism- to understand them, to acknowledge our own short comings and to take concrete actions to achieve a more humane, fair and just world. For example, insisting on the use of land mines, using cluster bombs and white phosphorus- are acts of cowardice that make us less, not more secure. Condemning human rights reports that show a consistent pattern of abuse from a traditional ally- hurt rather than promote the cause of human justice and encourage the spread of terrorism. Supporting corrupt and oppressive regimes throughout the world - again fans the flames of terrorism and hatred.
It is true that no nation or individual is perfect. This lack of perfection is not an excuse for violence-there is in fact no excuse for violence. However, if the world is to prosper, there needs to be a collective responsibility among nations. Sometimes bold acts of courage can start with our leaders. In the case of President Obama, he has consistently shown a lack of such courage, despite what appears to be good intentions. Still- there is always hope- always the ability to learn and grow.
"good intentions" -- Where? Here?...No...Over here?...Hmm... Ah, under here...Nope. Ha ha.
Truth be told. No one thought he would be this bad. Who even thought Clinton would be this bad?
I expected 'this bad' - based on his FISA vote and 'Commander-in-chief' campaign rhetoric -but not this soon.
What I expected were a few cosmetic bones thrown to the progressive 'base' as he quietly continued the free-market (sic) drift rightward. Instead, he slammed the rudder hard to starboard on inauguration day and has never looked back on the voters left bobbing in the wake.
Democrats or Republicans, same shit, different assholes.
Actually, the asshole is the same. Uncle Sam has (or had) an anus with two exit holes. However, the proctologist who examines him yearly finds the two holes increasingly becoming one until now they are, for all intents and purposes, indistinguishable. This has been attested to and certified by J.D. Power and Associates.
Ass souls, indeed. And the content of Obama's character depends on what the definition of SLEAZE is!
A one-year litany of domestic disappointments could be captured by a bumper sticker reading "the audacity of hopelessness."
Where can I get one of these?
I want one too!
And a t-shirt.
From article:
"More and more Americans are wise to the fact that because Democrats and Republicans are virtually indistinguishable on the issues that matter most, the "change we can believe it" will not be forthcoming from these two business parties."
Quite right. In other words a de-facto one-party state. Democracy becomes only a symbolic and empty term that rhymes with hypocrisy.
Ralph Nader, Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn and others have been saying this for decades now. Time to heed the call.
Usually it takes a couple of years before you can predict a President will be a one-termer, but President Obama has sealed this fate in record time. The best part about his administration is that we can no longer entertain any illusions that one major party serves the people any better than the other. Most of us are just not in a high enough income bracket to get either party's attention.
It really IS too soon to tell, IMO.
Dreadful as it seems, even today I suspect that the lesser-evil trap remains cocked and loaded. Even a chewed-up and picked-over carcass like Obama might lure enough dull, desperate Palinphobic voters to prevail.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Obedient Servant
I can say without hesitation that Obama is a one term President. He has lost the folks that elected him and he will not get them back. That I am decidedly sure of. I'd bet real money on this.
Even a Palin could beat him, God Forbid....but she is not a serious player. A leader will come forth for the Republicans and their nominee will be the next President.
Obama/Pelosi/Reid have guaranteed it.
No Henry. Don't say it, not even in jest. Things are bad now, but put a republicanazi in the driver's seat...holy shit!!!
This is make or break for this grand old experiment. Either a viable populist third party that will represent the people emerges before 2012 (2010 is really gonna be interesting) or I strongly suggest everyone interested in living a semi-free lifestyle get their passport up to date and either make plane reservations or pick the quickest route north or south, which ever border you prefer!
We are on our own. There is nobody at any level of power, who is actually looking out for us, with the possible exception of some local governments. And there is little hope in organizing/supporting a "progressive" faction in the Dem party or a third party. The Dem Progressive Caucus has been caged, hobbled and neutered. Third parties cannot get into the game in any meaningful way given the arcane, anti-democratic rules of electoral politics. Street demos are ignored and under-attended. Everybody is too busy trying to make a living and avoid foreclosure or eviction.
Kids are too busy trying to memorize and regurgitate info-bites at our business-friendly degree mills or should I say credentialing companies. We're all getting priced out of "higher education" anyway.
The unions have become a sad joke, ever willing to fund Dem leaders who slap them down repeatedly, ever willing to expend scarce resources on stupid, brutal internal disputes.
What is to be done? First of all we must give up "hope", in the sense of "hope" and "change". We must instead act as if we're already dead, already renditioned in some gulag outpost, already silenced, already whipped and chained with shoulder to an ever more burdensome plow. What we fear isn't on its way; it's here now.
If we are going to have any influence at all on the present and the future, massive, sustained non-cooperation will be required. This wall cause suffering, pain, dislocation, death, poverty, heartbreak, loss and terrible loneliness. It is also the only thing left to us. We have been excluded from every other means of effective "redress of grievances". Our way of life is a mockery of our founding documents and our original political project, which, with all its serious shortcomings, at least exalted human freedom and set a course for its expansion. We went off the tracks a long time ago, but those words still mean something to some of us.
What are we going to do Common Dreamers? What are we going to do?
Hi Jareilly, congratulations.
When we ask, "What are we going to do?" we have taken the most important first step. Yes we are alone, in the USA political universe anyway, and yes, we need to practice non-cooperation with the establishment. But we also need to learn how to cooperate with EACH OTHER so that we can create counter institutions and a counterculture.
Here are two books on the subject (which just happen to have ben written by friends of mine in Berkeley.
1. John Curl's, "For All the People: Uncovering the Hidden History of Cooperation, Cooperative Movements, and Communalism in America"
2. Janelle Orsi & Emily Doskow: "The Sharing Solution: How to Save Money, Simplify Your Life & Build Community"
Also, google "Mondragon,Spain" the workers' co-operative movement of over 90,000 people, ("twice as profitable as the average corporation in Spain") and "MST,Brazil" the "Landless Workers' Movement" which has occupied enough land non-violently to create farms and co-ops for over a million people, and which has created its own art, music, schools and churches.
In answer to the question, "What are we going to do?" there is a huge history which we need to study and learn. Enjoy!
Before we can create a mass political party, we first have to build a mass social movement. Let's get going.
I do not believe that a third party--led by Ralph Nader or Cynthia McKinney or Elizabeth Warren or whom you please--has any chance of electoral success at the present time for reasons too numerous to name. What Jane Hamsher is doing over at Firedoglake, on the other hand, strikes me as very promising. Namely, recruiting volunteers to call progressive voters in other Congressional districts and states to put pressure on their lawmakers to take progressive positions on key pieces of legislation--or face challenges from real progressives when the next primaries roll around. At the same time Firedoglake stands ready to raise grassroots funds to offset any loss of corporate contributions if these lawmakers actually vote for meaningful reform. Take the current health care fight. You may live in New York City or LA. But you can get a list of Democratic voters in Arkansas and Nevada from Firedoglake, along with training in what to say, to put the heat on the likes of Pryor and Reid. If these lawmakers end up shafting us, we'll work with local progressive groups to defeat them in the primaries. That's how a new progressive party can arise from within the existing Democratic party. We don't have to start from scratch.
You are dead wrong ...
The only way forward is with a progressive party ... just look at the "progressive caucus" ... failure at every turn ... mightn't we strengthen their spine if they see candidates from the left?
The only way forward is with a progressive party. The Republican-Democratic warfare-bankster-anti labor-globalizer duopoly will never, never put progressive policies in place.
Look at the breadth and depth of the field for a progressive alternative...
Labor, Environmentalists, Liberals and Progressives.
The time is now to join and support The Green Party ... You have nothing to lose, Obama is Bush III, and everything to gain ... Unless there is a third party to shake things up, unless there is real pressure from the left on every Dem and Rethug corporatism lives on, sucking the life blood from us and our children, America, the World and the Environment.
Hey MMCKINL, good to see you here at CD!
I'm in agreement with you. It is way past time to kick the dems and republicanazis to the curb and get ALL of our power behind one prgressive but representative party. Since the Green Party has the organization already established, we need to get the push behind them. Liberals, prgressives, left leaning libertarians (and they do exist...trust me on this one), hell, even a few educated "tea-baggers" (I know, an oxymoron, but there are those who do realize that the elite are the ones fucking them over econmically). The bottom line is we need the numbers. We need the power of the pissed off population to get things done!
Count me in. I am behind you 1000%! Let's go. Let's get organized and kiss some political ass!!!
I see no reason that these approaches should be mutually exclusive. Much the opposite:
Make all the calls you want. Make more than you'd like to. If you have been a loyal Democrat, say so over and over. But let the snakes know the door opens both ways. Let them know that you know you got hoodwinked, and you know that they did it on purpose, that they have used up all their credit, and that you're doing business on a cash-up-front basis.
And if they don't produce something better than pablum by 2010, vote against every incumbent who didn't stand up and make a noise.
And then call them again and let them all know what you did and why.
..
Electoral success? You might want to define that.
For anyone with a progressive agenda, 5% and a reason the Demned Elect ought to L I S T E N has been the toastiest game in town since 1972.
This has nothing to do with an unwillingness to compromise. Let the Dems cough up a proposition that does involve what their constituency wants: like health care and withdrawing from the occupations, for starters.
This is far from extreme. This is what the majority of all Americans want - Demoplican, Republicrat, and Nonentity.
Your advice is only meaningful to those who agree with the actual Dem Party platform (vs. the idealistic agenda that no longer exists). In a nutshell, the true Dem Party platform involves carrying out these agenda items: constituent service to corporations, war funding, defense spending to fund home districts, bankster bailouts, for-profit medicine controlled by insurance companies, and many more odious things.
If you agree with all of that, by all means go with "the Dog."
However, you should know that Firedoglake and MoveOn.org are just two funding arms for the Democrats. Their purpose isn't really reform. The purpose is to divert the left portion of the Dem Party's base more toward compromise and acceptance of the corporate agenda. If you think that's not what those groups are doing, you need to track just how far they will go on progressive matters. You'll find that they stop short of real reform and meaningful policy changes.
And no, that's not the wisdom of compromise. It's surrender to corporate rule.
-TIA
Nine months after all the liberals planted their seed of hope in obama...
The truth has finally donned on them that not only is he not carrying their "love child" after all...
But that, In fact, he never even was pregnant... it was only a "sympathy belly" all along...
To fool voters into providing him with "maternity leave" & "child support" before & after the election...
I remember after inauguration day, my liberal friends celebrating that Obama had closed Gitmo,
And they were shocked & offended when I reminded them that he had only "pledged" to close it...
Predictably, like clock work, Obama has reneged on that promise as well...
And now the liberals are "holding his feet to the fire" for honoring his campaign pledge to send more troops into Afghanistan...? It is one of the only campaign pledges he has honored...
they all should be praising him for being truthful to his word for Once...
Even though that was the one campaign pledge that they were hoping he would change...
When are the liberals going to realize that Obama is a Confidence Man and they have been had...?
It seems the process resembled more his planting his seed in them.
At this point, the only way Obama can redeem himself and prove that his promise of "change" was authentic is if he calls his entire administration to a meeting in a high school gymnasium and kills them all with telekinetic powers a la Carrie (De Palma, 1976).
Join and Support the Green Party ...
Isn't it crystal clear that nothing progressive will happen as long as we have the Republican-Democratic duopoly in power. Just look at the "progressive" caucus in the house ... a miserable failure at every turn ...
There is only one answer, join a party that stands for progressive policy... The Green Party ...
I've changed. I see Obama as no different than W when it comes to action. I think we've gotten exactly what we'd have gotten if W had been allowed a 3rd term, or if McCain had won. No real health care reform, just the pretense of one; Gitmo remains open; renditions continue unabated; we are still in Iraq in equal numbers; rather than hastening our exit from Afghanistan, we are sending 30,000 more troops to deal with 100 estimated Al Qaeda members; we've bailed out the big banks at the expense of regular people; we're doing next to nothing to help those facing foreclosure, but allowing Wall St to dish out obscene bonuses; no movement on climate change issues; no progress on growing a green economy. Yep, if this is change then I'm Cleopatra.
I don't believe in this administration. Who is in charge and who they listen to are the same old hacks and insiders as ever. There are no new ideas coming out of Obama's top advisors -- how could there be? If you don't bring in fresh minds who are not and have not been part of the ruling financial and governmental regime, you're not going to get any thinking outside that box.
I'm so over it, you can't begin to inspire me again.
hope and change! Change we can believe in! real hope, real change! Yes we did! Hey you voted for him, live with your choice!
Proportional representation, anyone, or is that yet another quaint idea only more successful "democracies" practice?
Or perhaps it is too complex an idea for our math-challenged Diebolds.
-30-
"can the Nobel Peace Prize be rescinded?"
Either rescinded or rendered irrelevant. Dynamite's choice.
"For those who worked and voted for Obama, especially younger folks, all of this must be a bitter pill to swallow, a giant step backward toward disillusionment and cynicism. I prefer to interpret it as a necessary and valuable lesson in electoral illusions for those truly serious about making this a better country"
A bitter pill? A necessary lesson? To the people who voted Demok, O'Bamba is neither. O'Bamba is simply a personification of the fossil/material opiates these people were addicted to before they voted in Nov 2008. They voted to perpetuate the opiate flow, simply put.
Bitter pill. Necessary lesson. Hilarious.
When the people are ready to kick the opiate addictions, they'll vote third party.