EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Popular content
Today's Top News
Alberta's Tar Sands Make Canada a Climate Criminal
Canada's image lies in tatters. It is now to climate what Japan is to whaling
When you think of Canada, which qualities come to mind? The world's peacekeeper, the friendly nation, a liberal counterweight to the harsher pieties of its southern neighbour, decent, civilised, fair, well-governed? Think again. This country's government is now behaving with all the sophistication of a chimpanzee's tea party. So amazingly destructive has Canada become, and so insistent have my Canadian friends been that I weigh into this fight, that I've broken my self-imposed ban on flying and come to Toronto.
So here I am, watching the astonishing spectacle of a beautiful, cultured nation turning itself into a corrupt petro-state. Canada is slipping down the development ladder, retreating from a complex, diverse economy towards dependence on a single primary resource, which happens to be the dirtiest commodity known to man. The price of this transition is the brutalisation of the country, and a government campaign against multilateralism as savage as any waged by George Bush.
Until now I believed that the nation that has done most to sabotage a new climate change agreement was the United States. I was wrong. The real villain is Canada. Unless we can stop it, the harm done by Canada in December 2009 will outweigh a century of good works.
In 2006 the new Canadian government announced it was abandoning its targets to cut greenhouse gases under the Kyoto protocol. No other country that had ratified the treaty has done this. Canada was meant to have cut emissions by 6% between 1990 and 2012. Instead they have already risen by 26%.
It is now clear that Canada will refuse to be sanctioned for abandoning its legal obligations. The Kyoto protocol can be enforced only through goodwill: countries must agree to accept punitive future obligations if they miss their current targets. But the future cut Canada has volunteered is smaller than that of any other rich nation. Never mind special measures; it won't accept even an equal share. The Canadian government is testing the international process to destruction and finding that it breaks all too easily. By demonstrating that climate sanctions aren't worth the paper they're written on, it threatens to render any treaty struck at Copenhagen void.
After giving the finger to Kyoto, Canada then set out to prevent the other nations striking a successor agreement. At the end of 2007, it singlehandedly blocked a Commonwealth resolution to support binding targets for industrialised nations. After the climate talks in Poland in December 2008, it won the Fossil of the Year award, presented by environmental groups to the country that had done most to disrupt the talks. The climate change performance index, which assesses the efforts of the world's 60 richest nations, was published in the same month. Saudi Arabia came 60th. Canada came 59th.
In June this year the media obtained Canadian briefing documents which showed the government was scheming to divide the Europeans. During the meeting in Bangkok in October, almost the entire developing world bloc walked out when the Canadian delegate was speaking, as they were so revolted by his bullying. Last week the Commonwealth heads of government battled for hours (and eventually won) against Canada's obstructions. A concerted campaign has now begun to expel Canada from the Commonwealth.
In Copenhagen next week, this country will do everything in its power to wreck the talks. The rest of the world must do everything in its power to stop it. But such is the fragile nature of climate agreements that one rich nation - especially a member of the G8, the Commonwealth and the Kyoto group of industrialised countries - could scupper the treaty. Canada now threatens the wellbeing of the world.
Why? There's a simple answer: Canada is developing the world's second largest reserve of oil. Did I say oil? It's actually a filthy mixture of bitumen, sand, heavy metals and toxic organic chemicals. The tar sands, most of which occur in Alberta, are being extracted by the biggest opencast mining operation on earth. An area the size of England, comprising pristine forests and marshes, will be be dug up - unless the Canadians can stop this madness. Already it looks like a scene from the end of the world: the strip-miners are creating a churned black hell on an unimaginable scale.
To extract oil from this mess, it needs to be heated and washed. Three barrels of water are used to process one barrel of oil. The contaminated water is held in vast tailings ponds, some so toxic that the tar companies employ people to scoop dead birds off the surface. Most are unlined. They leak organic poisons, arsenic and mercury into the rivers. The First Nations people living downstream have developed a range of exotic cancers and auto-immune diseases.
Refining tar sands requires two to three times as much energy as refining crude oil. The companies exploiting them burn enough natural gas to heat six million homes. Alberta's tar sands operation is the world's biggest single industrial source of carbon emissions. By 2020, if the current growth continues, it will produce more greenhouse gases than Ireland or Denmark. Already, thanks in part to the tar mining, Canadians have almost the highest per capita emissions on earth, and the stripping of Alberta has scarcely begun.
Canada hasn't acted alone. The biggest leaseholder in the tar sands is Shell, a company that has spent millions persuading the public that it respects the environment. The other great greenwasher, BP, initially decided to stay out of tar. Now it has invested in plants built to process it. The British bank RBS, 70% of which belongs to you and me (the government's share will soon rise to 84%), has lent or underwritten £8bn for mining the tar sands.
The purpose of Canada's assault on the international talks is to protect this industry. This is not a poor nation. It does not depend for its economic survival on exploiting this resource. But the tar barons of Alberta have been able to hold the whole country to ransom. They have captured Canada's politics and are turning this lovely country into a cruel and thuggish place.
Canada is a cultured, peaceful nation, which every so often allows a band of Neanderthals to trample over it. Timber firms were licensed to log the old-growth forest in Clayaquot Sound; fishing companies were permitted to destroy the Grand Banks: in both cases these get-rich-quick schemes impoverished Canada and its reputation. But this is much worse, as it affects the whole world. The government's scheming at the climate talks is doing for its national image what whaling has done for Japan.
I will not pretend that this country is the only obstacle to an agreement at Copenhagen. But it is the major one. It feels odd to be writing this. The immediate threat to the global effort to sustain a peaceful and stable world comes not from Saudi Arabia or Iran or China. It comes from Canada. How could that be true?
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


25 Comments so far
Show Allthis is the time when most, if not all, of what many would consider to be our common previously-held beliefs will fall...
Canada Is Good...America Is Great...gimme a break...
love is a verb, not a noun...love requires presence and action, not words...
Canadians, like all other citizens, will have to join with the world on September 22, 2012 to voluntarily withdraw, as one, from our energy-dependent, industrially-devastating, economy-driven and property-owning ways...
>>>The immediate threat to the global effort to sustain a peaceful and stable world comes not from Saudi Arabia or Iran or China. It comes from Canada. How could that be true?
Like with many things, it's the inability of many Canadians to understand what is sustainable. It's not just the Harper government - the blame should go to the previous Liberal government as well who did little to put policies in place to meet their commitments under the Kyoto Accord - after all, they were the ones who signed it. So, instead of achieving a modest 6% reduction in emissions below 1990 levels (by 2012, as per 'Kyoto'), Canada's emissions were up 30%. And this during a period when whatever manufacturing was there got shut down or shipped out (same is true for the USA, too - how come the emissions went up during a period when so much of the manufacturing was moved overseas?)
I suspect that distraction with hockey could be a factor (I didn't say 'the' factor). And, like in the USA, a general belief that it's a true democracy - whereas the fact is that a slim majority can be used to wield so much power. When a question regarding a modest reform towards more participatory democracy was put on the ballot in the British Columbia elections (as an example), half the voters didn't bother to show up for voting. The elections were "conveniently" held during Stanley Cup playoffs. At the federal level, the Green Party which has won a substantial number of votes across the country has NOT A SINGLE member in the Parliament - because of the 'first past the post' system. One guy who sounded somewhat genuine (Stephane Dion) on environmental issues stood little chance of becoming the PM because he was a lousy speaker and had no charisma. And the guy who replaced Dion as the Liberal Party head and who can't wait to become the PM (Michael Ignatieff) has also come out in support of the Alberta tar sands - so don't hold your breath for any immediate change after the next elections.
The reason that Canada (and Britain, and a whole lot of other countries) are able to get away with it all is because everyone knows who's the baddest of them all. The USA is a convenient cover for so many other laggards. In soccer, there's something called the 'offside trap'. It would be interesting to see the reaction and true colors of so many countries if, by a miracle, the USA were to suddenly go green.
"Like with many things, it's the inability of many Canadians to understand what is sustainable." Agreed.
I have been across this country many times and there are far too many Canadians that do not know what the hell is even going on. They just want to drink beer, have sex, and forget about reality...
I was born in Toronto and I've lived in Canada my whole life. I do not support Harper or his disgusting backward business first policies. I don't care about Hockey. What I do care about is our environment. The Boreal Forest is constantly under threat, our First Nations People are mostly ignored and marginalized, the fresh water supplies are being polluted, the fish stocks are being wiped out, the biodiversity of this entire nation is rapidly crumbling before my eyes.
Kyoto wasn't a failure: our government failed. Dion should be PM right now. The Green Party leader turned her back on the one thing that spelled success for Greens: one seat in parliament, but she threw that away in order to run a no-win situation in her own riding that was going to the conservatives no matter what.
It's a shame that so many failures have gathered together in and around office in an attempt to sustain nothing but their bulging paychecks while the rest of the planet is told to forget about their own resources, forget about health, forget about peace.
There are hundreds of thousands of Canadians who are changing how they live their daily lives in order to do what our "government" refuses: to tackle the real issues of gluttony and pollution.
Thank you that is all I have to say right now.
Canada is to the climate what Union Carbide is to Bhopal.
That would be more apropo.
If you are interested in the truth behind the Tar Sands, check this out:
http://h2oildoc.com/home/
and for more info, check out submedia:
http://submedia.tv/stimulator/
Also: Oil Sands Truth - http://oilsandstruth.org/
With the exception of, for now, its public healthcare syatem, and maybe a couple other social programs, I am coming to the conclusion that Canada is even further advanced on the path of corporate neoliberal capitalism and privatization than the US is.
An inportant toll highway in suburban Totonto ("The 407") was completely privatized in 1999. The company that now owns the highway charges $27 to drive it's 100 km length, collects fees using a advanced camera syatem that reads license plate numbers, and sends the drivers bills that accrue 27% interest!
And unions are being busted or cowed with a media-whipped hysterical ferocity at least as bad as anywhere here in the US.
If you don't beleive me, just go to the Toronto Star, open any labor or public service news story, an read the shrill remarks from the market-extremists. The ghosts of Ayn Rand and Ronald Reagan are stalking the Great White North big time!
It doesn't have to be that way! There are new and very promising technoligies on the market that can extract bitumen without the environmental morass or at least without 80% of it. What has to happen as always is the persuasion from homegrown citizens to international agencies must be brought to bear to use these new technologies no matter how much was spent on the old technolgies.
Canada is targeted for resource extraction.
China provides cheap labor.
Latin America will grow food.
Europe will be a museum.
US will be financial control capital with a few million servitors for maintenance.
Environmental pollution will just be another social control device.
Overall will rule the few thousand members of global command class.
>>>Europe will be a museum.
Thanks for the chuckle !!
Much bigger chuckle:
"US will be financial control capital..."
Like the drug gangs in Mexico, Canadian tar sand extraction has an addicted customer with lots of money. Us.
Hillary has blessed the pipeline from Alberta to the US. The US remains climate enemy number one.
With the earth cooling as the global warming controversy heats up, this makes Monbiot two for two in his latest misfires and public forays. Looks as though he is going to pretend there is global warming right to the bitter end. Wonder what would get him to change his mind.. Just a rhetorical question.. no need for a question mark.
The blue media seems to be even more blindered than Monbiot.. Not a peep from them on the world wide controversy and the gigantic reset-panic button blaring at them. Just a eerie.. keep moving.. NOTHING here to see. Move on.
Blue media? Blue is the color associated internationally with conservatism. Your small-minded US insularity is showing.
Temperatures are not declining. That is utter nonsense. There are some elementary statistical concepts - taught around the world in sixth grade or earlier, but in the USA are considered an advanced mathematical concepts. Among them is this thing called a linear regression.
Please study it, then tell me global climate is cooling.
"In 2006 the new Canadian government announced it was abandoning its targets to cut greenhouse gases under the Kyoto protocol"
No, CANADA isn't...
but the CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF CANADA is
under Calgarian criminal Prime Minister Steven Harper..elected by a MINORITY of Canadians
please dont tar all Canadians with the tar sands brush.
Canada had signed Kyoto in good will until BUSH came along and scuttled the whole deal, which emboldened the conservatives to do the same.
The Harper government is a MINORITY government. The majority of Canadians did not vote for this man!!! The two opposition parties do not have the cajones/ovarios to bring this guy down. Maybe this will do it. Biggest mistake the liberals ever did was Michael Ignatieff - send him back to Boston or Harvard or wherever he escaped from. Jack Layton, where are you when we need you -- and don't be pulling an Obama on us!
Unfortunately, I do not see Ignatieff as an Enviromentalist. The guy might squawk about going "Green" but that only because he is in opposition and seeks to curry support with those who would abandon the Liberals for the Greens or the NDP.
As to the NDP, they have bought into the swill that they have to be more friendly towards the Corporations and Big Business in order to gain any leverage.
There an underlying problem here and that has to do with the nature of the voter. Several years ago when the economy booming and we were running surplus after surplus the number one Issue with Canadians was "The Enviroment".
Then the downturn and jobs lost and the number one issue is now "Jobs and the Economy". The problem is too many see those as diametrically opposed.
The mindset is "Protecting the Enviroment means loss of jobs and income and Canadians become poorer' The "people" see it as being a CHOICE.
This is the message we are sold by the Corporations and their supporters in Government. The message they sell is "Sure we can protect the enviroment but then You will all have to Go on UI, line up at food banks and wont be able to send your children to University".
We have to break that mindset and its not so easily done.
I read recently that a major agribusiness is going into partnership with a number of First Nations tribes in Western Canada. For a yearly fee paid to those tribes they are going to have Reservation land turned over to them to farm.
Enviromentalists are concerned but..
It the Natives land and they have had generation after generation of living in poverty. Now they see a chance to garner wealth....They see this as a means to improving their financial status and giving their people what so many others take for granted....
At the same time we well know where Corporate Agriculture leads...
So how to react?
This the same thing with those tar sands. Folk come from all over Canada to work up there....These are people from some of the poorest regions In Canada. They make 100K plus a year. How can you tell them it not GOOD?
I am not proud to be Canadian- we have a shallow right-wing government that rules a semi-literate bunch of red neck hockey fans. What nobody talks about here in the Great White North is the wide spread racism. As a white, middle-aged male I am sorry to say that most of my fellow Canadians could never elect anyone but someone like me. No Obama, no Native Americans, no women will ever be elected to the office of Prime Minister. If Canada has ever done anything to earn the reputation of a non-partisan moderate, it was by accident.
"No Obama, no Native Americans, no women will ever be elected to the office of Prime Minister."
Sounds a bit silly and likely self-flattering on your part. The GG is black, and even if she wasn't elected, she is extremely popular in the job, and she was selected by people who knew that she would be popular. The former GG was of Chinese origin, and she was popular as well.
In 1993, the Conservatives chose a woman as their leader because the very sophisticated polling told them that Canada was more than ready for a woman. And it looks like it was. But Kim Campbell ran an absolutely horrible campaign, plus she followed the deeply unpopular Mulroney, and her party was devastated. But she was selected by the most conservative of group of $$$ people because they knew that Canada was ready for a woman and she was very popular at the time.
Why is it silly? You yourself say that the Governor General is not elected. According to Wikipedia, the current GG was born in Haiti - although she moved to Canada with her family 40 years ago? And the previous GG was born in Hong Kong - also moved to Canada with her family at a young age. Again, according to Wikipedia, "The Governor General of Canada is the viceregal representative in the federal jurisdiction of the Canadian monarch and head of state, Queen Elizabeth II...Between 1867 and 1952, all Governors General were born beyond Canada's borders and were members of the Peerage; these viceroys spent a relatively limited time in Canada, but their travel schedules were so extensive that they could "learn more about Canada in five years than many Canadians in a lifetime." In a Parliamentary system, the real power lies with the Prime Minister - even one who's heading a minority government. And the GG is probably even selected (?) by the Prime Minister of the day, though formally appointed by the Queen? So I don't see how this is a proper response to freespeaker's comment.
Abdullahoblongoda writes:
"With the earth cooling as the global warming controversy heats up, this makes Monbiot two for two in his latest misfires and public forays. Looks as though he is going to pretend there is global warming right to the bitter end..."
The source for this mythification probably is the report that 1998 was the hottest year in recent history, which may or may not be true but nevertheless irrelevant in the greater scheme of things, primarily because while there may be a temporary respite in terms of global warming, per se, there is an inexorable increase in greenhouse gases due to human activity.
Mother Earth from a human perspective can be fickle on a day to day basis, even year on year, decade on decade, but the great bulk of research is now predicting a disaster.
"Over the river and through the woods to grandmother's house we go, the snow..." Oops! Here in Indiana we just had our first SNOWLESS November in memory. What the hell, my favorite radish is still growing because morning lows never got cold enough to kill it. But of course that is only ANECDOTAL, like the reports from the Nations of the Tundra that their communities are sliding into the sea.
Perhaps when the Greenland ice sheets slide into the sea, people like oblongoda will wake up, too late.
One of America's problems in confronting global warming is that the great majority of us live in "the built environment" which separates their daily lives from Mother Earth. For most, the "weather" is little more than an inconvenience except when blizzards or typhoons impinge. Probably, a lot of Americans think that Global Warming will cut down on their winter heating bills. They might be right.
Canada, meanwhile, is the perfect place for the tar sands to appear, given that it takes so much water to process the tar sands, and Canada is blessed with fresh water, the most valuable commodity.
-30-
Surely, it is too late for politics. People must do something themselves, at least community Canadian flag burnings, if not mounting the case for treason. Tarring and feathering images of the Canadian PM Harper might be fun, too.
Here is a short video we made, ‘STAND ON GUARD, O CANADA: Treason and Ecocide in the tar sands’ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgBGwsLILic.
Please pass this invition to direct resistance around as widely as possible being from tsresistance@googlemail.com where people can join and receive the outline of the treason case against those running the Canadian government.
So sad, so true. A very good article. In Manitoba, no snow in November. What's up with that? The current minority Government refuses to protect its (Muslim) citizens from illegal torture abroad; and as pointed out here, actively blocks environmental progress by others. It is a minority government, but only because the other three parties refuse to form a coalition. The one brief moment when they did, the Liberal Party could not hold true to its position for even two short weeks. Now look where they are. The Liberals, NDP and BQ are a very sorry group with no principles they are willing to stand for, no principles they are willing to stand together on, and they have found a way to make the Conservatives look competent by comparison. Egads.
The problem we have in Canada is that, unlike the United States, the left part of the political spectrum is divided into four different parties, the Liberals, the New Democrat Party, the Bloc Quebecois and the Green Party. The entire right wing is housed within one party, the Conservatives (which was actually a nasty mix of a regional rightwingnut protest party called Reform and the near dead Progressive Conservatives, the party that Kim Campbell led to a marvelous defeat in better years.
Due to a stupid miscalculation, a Liberal Minority Government headed by an overeager Paul Martin who rolled the dice and lost. Since Canada has a first past the finish line electoral system, with the votes for the left split among so many choices, it was inevitable that the (newly named) Conservatives won the largest number of the seats in the country. This was how we got the parti-time mortuary salesman and Baptist Minister, Prime Sinister Harpo. I believe he may kiss his autographed picture of George W. Bush every night before he goes to sleep.
The only party that really wants to take effective action is the Green Party. They have an excellent intelligent platform and were very ably led by Elizabeth May, by far the most intelligent and articulate of the candidates for Prime Minister. Sadly, Canadian voters are still programmed to vote for a familiar face and name, and especially politicians liked by Big Business.
Alberta, home to Prime Sinister Harpo and the location of the tar sands is as ultra right wing as Texas in the States. The lure is money, money, money and concern about the environment is quite possibly the lowest item on the list of national concerns in that Province.
Even a coalition of parties on the left will not result in affirmative action. The parties are too split on what steps should be taken to combat Climate Change.
These days, the Economy trumps all. People don't want to give up their comforts. They want the burden to be carried by someone else.
I personally do not see how we can avoid a worst case scenario. It is almost certain now that we will experience a six to ten degree rise in global temperatures and a seven to ten foot rise in sea levels.
Canada stands to benefit most from global warming since the northern lands stand to become more fertile. I suspect there will be a mass migration of Climate Refugees to fill the available land.
Here's an investment tip. Buy some hills just back from the water in Iqaluit. It should be nice beach property soon enough.
Canada has long coasted on its past reputation, but the current regime is bringing the image of the country down big time. It is ideologically driven, vicious, and yes neo-fascist in word and deed. They strongly back the right in the Americas (position on Honduras is even worse than the US) and loudly supported Israel's past two wars while playing at demonizing critics. The fact the press is even more highly concentrated in Canada also does not bode well.
Canadians are even more pacified than Americans and just easily manipulated. Very sad.
These reports on the Canada that I remember as a liberal alternative to repressive USA are rather alarming. I have always wanted Canada to stand as a "northern tier state" much like the Scandinavians.
Canada gains absolutely nothing by any mimic of the USA. Better to listen to First Nations not corrupted by casinos.
Remember "freedom fries"!
It is better to remember history than to forget it.
-30-