No Escape from Debt by Selling Jails
Arizona's plan to sell prisons to the highest bidder is a leap back in time for correctional thinking, and a recipe for fiscal disaster
Here's an idea: sell off our prisons to the highest bidders, reap a pile of short-term cash to inflate near-empty state coffers, then lease back the prisons for 20 years at a cost to the state that far exceeds the original purchase price paid by the companies. While we're at it, let's completely privatise medical and mental health services - and mandate that bidders come in with lower per prisoner cost estimates than those currently paid out by the state. And, to cap it off, privatise the day-to-day operations of all the prisons, including supermaxes and death row sites, and, in an incentive to cut corners, split the savings 50-50 between the state and the private companies doing the administering.
Conservative fantasy? Alas, no. This is the set of kooky proposals recently embraced by legislatures in a near-insolvent Arizona, looking to trim dollars from their state budget.
A boondoggle to the private sector? Sure. A recipe for disaster as poorly paid, under-trained private prison guards assume control over supermax prisons - an environment in which private guards have had little-to-no prior experience (historically, private prison companies looking for easy criminal justice pickings have shied clear of hard-to-manage high security facilities)? Almost certainly. An invitation for prisoners to sue as medical and mental health services are farmed out to low-ball bidders? Yes, again.
"I'm telling you, it takes the cake," says Caroline Isaacs, programme director of the prison-reform group the Arizona Friends Service Committee. "I've lived here for 15 years, and I'm completely blown away by this. This has never been done anywhere."
A couple of weeks ago, the Pew Research Centre found that 10 states were facing particularly devastating budget implosions. Not surprisingly, many of these - including California, Arizona, Nevada, and Florida - were states hit particularly hard by the bursting of the housing bubble. Much has been written about California's crisis. But in many ways smaller states like Arizona are in even bigger trouble; and as they teeter on the brink, so increasingly bizarre policy proposals are gaining traction. Arizona's even contemplating selling off its capitol building, for Pete's sake.
A few years ago, in my book American Furies, I compared the reactionary practices of the Maricopa county jails - centered in Phoenix and run by the infamous Sheriff Joe Arpaio - to the progressive reforms being implemented in Arizona's state prisons by then-corrections commissioner Dora Schriro.
Schriro had made a name for herself in correctional circles through modernising prisons in the state of Missouri, developing a reform theory she labeled the "parallel universe". Her results had been impressive: lower recidivism rates, lower in-prison rates of violence, educational successes with inmates, drug-treatment programs that actually worked. In Arizona, too, she brought outside-the-box thinking to a large, and violent, system. For a few years, Arizona became something of a poster-child for prison reform.
But Schriro moved to DC to work for the Obama administration, researching and writing on conditions of confinement for illegal immigrants awaiting deportation, and then recently moved on to run the jail system in New York City.
She left behind a new, and relatively ineffectual, corrections administration in Arizona, one unable to defend its reforms from a conservative, and increasingly fiscally desperate, legislature and governor (Janet Napolitano, the previous, Democratic governor, also went to DC to work in the new administration, and her successor, Jan Brewer, is a Republican).
Now, the vacuum might soon be filled, as Arizona stands poised to go where no American state has gone before: sending out a request for proposals that could soon see an almost entirely privatised state prison system. That's a leap back not just a few decades but a few hundred years in correctional thinking.
Private prison companies in America have a dismal track record: a slew of escape scandals and prisoner abuse allegations brought major companies to their knees about a decade ago; workers at the facilities are paid abysmally low wages; and medical services, along with access to education, drug treatment, and vocational training frequently are on-paper fictions rather than genuine realities.
Privatisation might generate a few tens of millions of dollars for Arizona in the short-term; but the long-run costs - both financial and moral - of farming this basic state function out to for-profit private companies will likely be immense.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
25 Comments so far
Show AllHm. Sell off a longterm asset to solve a cash crisis?
Isn't that called a reverse mortgage?
Well, it's sure worked well for millions of older homeowners who were afraid of becoming poor. They fear it no more: They are.
Now, we can do it to a whole state!
Isn't this what's already being done, particularly, in places like Pennsylvania where the [dis]honorable judges make millions a year for sending rowdy kids to jail for years to the great advantage of the private contractors that finance them?
Mark my words, this will increase their costs DRAMATICALLY over the next ten years, and these "legislators" will be cursed forever, as they should be.
Colorado made just such a stupid and foolish move decades ago. Where 25 years ago, we spent $70 million per year on the DOC, now we spend $770 Million per year on it. We are now THIRD in the nation in prison spending. It's the single most STUPID thing that gov't can do, to abdicate it's responsibilities for the profits of a few at the expense of everyone else.
Oh, and just for the record, we now spend as much just on cannabis "crime" as we used to on EVERYTHING. It's now $69 MILLION per year because people use a PLANT. How GODDAMNED stupid can those in AZ be? It's NOT a good idea, it's ultimately going to cost you ten or 11 TIMES what it costs now.
Here's an idea: Try waking the hell up and seeing just what crimes REALLY need jail time and which are NOT CRIMES AT ALL. Locking someone up for things that don't involve anyone else is just plain STUPID. It's time to get off of the authoritarian kick that the republicans have put us on, for gov't to take back it's own responsibilities, and for this country to stop ruining people's lives for the profits of someone else.
If those in AZ do this, they will find that they have saved NOTHING, and that they have cost themselves their very freedom. When jail is a profitable thing, EVERY action that some shit head in congress doesn't like becomes a reason to lock YOU up. And NO ONE will be on your side then, because YOU will be a criminal. And the rich will continue to buy themselves out of trouble every time.
us senator lamar alexander made a fortune off private prisons in the 1980's. when he was governor of tennesse, he pushed for prison privatization all across tennessee. meanwhile, his wife made huge stock investments in cca stock, which she eventually sold at more than four times her purchase price. cca, as you might know, stands for corrections corporation of america, one of the biggest private prison corporations in the world.
Well I can see where this is going to lead:
To privatized courts. We already have a lot of that right now in so-called "rehab" programs, where private for-profit contractors make the decision (with the authority of the court) on whether you:
1. Are completed with the program
2. Have to repeat it for some small infraction like being one minute late over six months time.
3. Send you back to the court to be put in a longer program at the same facility for no given cause.
Note: It's not in their best interest to pick door number 1.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
And let's not forget the collection agencies that are in charge of collecting those fees, costs and fines for a percentage of what they bring in.
People need to keep at hand, as I do, the "bible" on all this privatizing crap, Naomi Klein's monumental The Shock Doctrine, describing how "disaster capitalism" (what else is a state's budget today?) uses "shock and awe" of privatization and reductions of social services to bring about a desired state of corporate dominance. As Abramsky well points out, Arizona is not exactly the unique case that the Arizona Friends lady asserts it to be. Any budget-stressed state is tempted to the disastrous quick fix of cash received for public facilities leased or sold to corporations. In this Faustian bargain, what they are going to get in return for selling the soul of the public commons is just the "hell" that is introduced wherever correctional corporations or private security forces (mercenaries) or charter schools are created: prisons, battle zones and schools where conditions of correction, war or education deteriorate badly.
Sioux Rose
JERRY: You see exactly what I do! Having released their Disaster Capitalism "trial balloons" on less populated/prosperous nations, they refined "the model" to bring it on home. It only took buying off enough senators and congress people, aligning with the big pockets that own media to shape public consent accordingly, after years of conservative "leaders" placing their crony capitalism exploiters onto the Supreme Court. Now the recipe is finished and we're about to taste the cake they baked. Makes me think about living in other nations on a DAILY basis.
P.S. good luck with the play. I intend to see it.
In the Red Mars trilogy by Kim Stanley Robinson, the nations of the world "Privatized" Governments wherein large Multinational Corporations would be given Contracts to run a given Country as a Business entity.
This is where this all leads.
That may not be exactly a new idea - because, after all, the British East India Company "ran" a large part of India until the 1850's, the Hudson's Bay Company had it's own "charter" over vast areas of Canada, the imperialist businessman Cecil John Rhodes (who founded 'De Beers', the diamond company in South Africa) actually got to name a huge area of land after himself: "Rhodesia" - which included most of today's Zimbabwe and Zambia, and so on...Colonialism was mostly an imperialist/corporate venture where the dirty work was done by the merchants and traders, enforced by mercenary troops, all in the name of God, King and the Country. Oh, and also freedom and democracy.
this is also a premise of some robert heinlein books from the late
fifties early sixties! its clear that the political "leaders"
are usually short sighted people with no creativity. i know
a man who works for mike bloomberg. here is how he describes
dealing with politicians "they are so stupid that you have to
take them by the arm and bring them inside when rains so they
don't get wet" this explains everything!
when one sees that the current world governments are, indeed, working in tandem, and across national boundaries, to foster the exploitation of all facets of industry, including devastating and wasteful accessing and harvesting of raw materials, toxic manufacturing and refining processes, and horrific labor conditions and wages, one understands we are already where you would place us...
so many of these activities are initiated and supported in the third world via military violence or covert influence or economic coercion, or some combination thereof...
Sioux Rose
GW NORTH: You always bring interesting info into the forum. I had to respond to the "Red Mars Trilogy" title, as you know how clearly I see the West's (particularly America's) alignment with the ethos relative to that sign/myth principle in its use, abuse, and worship of warfare. Hail Mars... not!
Anytime you see the word 'conservative' read one or more of the following: stupid, ignorant, greedy, crooked, selfish, heartless, sadistic, mentally ill, egotistic, sociopath, and of course bereft of any positive traits except maybe shrewd.
What they can't seem to understand is that after the richest 5% get through using them they will get no better treatment than the rest of us. If the slave master pats you on the head it's not because he likes you. He wants you to do something for him. Like the rest of us you are an object to him. When you are used up you will be thrown away.
a
Better yet, release all the prisoners inside for non-violent crimes, incarcerate the state legislators who vote for this idiocy and let them bugger each other into infinity. Make sure to photograph it all, for posterity as it were.
I know, but one can dream.
-30-
You would have to make Legislative Prison a work-release program...
I believe the term for Senators buggering each other into infinity is:
In Session...
Translation:
- Get the state to sell off the prisons.
- Take the money.
- Invest a small part of it in running prisons.
- Get most of the rest of it the hell out of the country before anyone's the wiser.
- Cut a deal with judges and law enforcement to bust peaceful (easier to guard) people for trifles so as to charge a premium to guard them.
Kids would be a particularly good target. Their parents mostly cannot raise them or do not want to anyway. They have far fewer protected rights, and they become institutionalized far more quickly.
Once a privatized prison is in place, it has to work this way, with amendments to stay clear of whatever regulatory agencies have actual teeth.
Why?
It's far more profitable to guard relatively harmless druggies and kids than violent criminals. Moreover, they're more common and therefore easier to find. Besides, since the criminals exist anyway, the kids become the growth industry.
Ooh, man - maybe it wasn't something I ate.
All according to the neo-liberal, Friedmanite, laissez-faire plan.
Privatize everything. Schools, Prisons, the lot. Why not? We already have a private Illness and Death Profit Industry.
Working class kids have three choices when they complete the 8th grade: Prison, the military, or wage slavery at Wal-Mart. All three choices generate huge profits.
Rich kids will go to private schools and then on to Stanford, Harvard... $37,000 per year for tuition only? No problem.
Page one in the World Bank's play book.
as long as our politicians are prostituting themselves, anyway, and way too cheaply, why don't the states pimp them out, raise the rates substantially, and use the money for public purposes, rather than have much smaller amounts personally benefit only the whore?
Privatize our public servants, officially...finally...
Privatized prisons will only encourage systems that result in increasing numbers of prisoners, whether those systems are just or no...
The ensuing corruption will be beyond our wildest imagination. Example: two judges in New York were recently convicted of taking kickbacks from privately-run, juvenile detention facilities to insure beds were filled. This was just the beginning....
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/28/us/28judges.html
The ensuing corruption will be beyond our wildest imagination. Example: two judges in New York were recently convicted of taking kickbacks from privately-run, juvenile detention facilities to insure beds were filled. This was just the beginning....
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/28/us/28judges.html
Great reference, I heard about that story on KPFA news (Pacifica Radio). Absolutely disgusting.
I thought the judges resided in Philadelphia, and therefore, the story took place in Pennsylvania, not in New York.
From Democracy Now!:
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/1/29/headlines#16