Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Where's the Love? Will Lisa Jackson and Nancy Sutley Ever Visit a Mountaintop Removal Site?
I think at the Obama administration we all believe that everybody has the right to live in a clean, healthy environment and a prosperous economy. And we're working towards that. We need to reach out to communities whose voices have been ignored and where there are disproportional impacts, whether it's environmental protection or promoting [a] clean energy economy. --Nancy Sutley interview, July 31, 2009
Question of the week: Given all of their agencies' beautiful rhethoric about "reaching out to communities whose voices have been ignored and where there are disproportional impacts," why haven't EPA chief Lisa Jackson and CEQ administrator Nancy Sutley found three hours in the schedules to visit a mountaintop removal site--the most egregious environmental tragedy in their administration?
Will they ever visit Coal River Mountain in West Virginia--the mountaintop removal battleground for clean energy and a healthy environment?
On June 11, in responding to the national outcry over the tragedy of mountaintop removal mining, the Obama administration promised it would, "engage the public through outreach events in the Appalachian region to help inform the development of Federal policy."
And the EPA, the Council on Environmental Quality and the Department of Interior jointly announced their intent to "work in coordination with appropriate regional, state, and local entities to help diversify and strengthen the Appalachian regional economy and promote the health and welfare of Appalachian communities."
Five months later, where is the Obama administration and its promises to visit the besieged coalfields of Appalachia?
EPA chief Lisa Jackson flew 1,687 miles to the Rocky Mountains of Colorado this week to speak to a high school in Denver, but she--or any top level of her staff--has yet to visit a nearby mountaintop removal mine in Appalachia. (In May, Jackson flew 2,001 miles to visit the less controversial Black Thunder Coal Mine in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming.)
In the meantime: An estimated 1.6 billion pounds of ammonium nitrate fuel explosives have ripped across the lush Appalachia mountains, as part of mountaintop removal operations, since the Obama administration took power in January.
1.6 billion pounds of explosives.
Since Jackson began her career with the EPA in the mid-1980s, over 500 mountains have been blown up, 1.2 million acres of hardwood forests have been clear cut, an estimated 2,000 miles of waterways have been jammed with mining waste, and untold numbers of American citizens have been forced to relocate, through mountaintop removal operations.
Horrific violations of the Clean Water Act have reached a state of emergency in the coalfields--and the front page of the New York Times.
And while affected Appalachian coalfield residents have made numerous visits to Washington, DC to plead for environmental justice and their lives in a virtual war zone, and while over 20,000 petitions were hand delivered to the EPA headquarters last month calling for a SINGLE visit to the region, there is still no word, no announcement, no plans for a visit by Lisa Jackson and Nancy Sutley.
Where's the love?
Nancy Sutley believes environmental justice is a civil rights issue, and she traveled over a 1,000 miles to New Orleans last month, to assure American citizens concerned about coastal restoration and levee safety issues that: "We've heard before and we've heard here again today the need for urgency and we certainly understand the need for urgency."
But Nancy Sutley--or any top level of her staff--has never visited a mountaintop removal site in Appalachia where American citizens are literally dying from coal slurry-contaminated drinking water, and have been forced out of their homes from reckless blasting, fly rock, and coal dust.
While the EPA made an important step to actually apply the law with greater scrutiny of mountaintop removal permits in September, only one federal agency has made any attempt to keep the Obama administration's promise to reach out to Appalachia, in Appalachia: The Army Corps of Engineers, and they held quite possibly the most disorganized, chaotic and violation-ridden hearing in West Virginia in the recent history of the coalfields; residents are still calling for an investigation by the Department of Justice.
And where are those green jobs "to help diversify and strengthen the Appalachian regional economy"?
While small efforts have been made for some reforestation projects, the coal barons and the pitiful WV politicians all know that mountaintop removal has plundered the Appalachian economy, beleaguered the region in eternal costs, and wiped out any diversified economic development and even stopped a tiny tiny initiative for green jobs in West Virginia from passing through the state legislature.
Faced with a declining domestic and world coal demand, the out-of-state global warming-denying union-busting coal barons (CEOs from Virginia, Texas and St. Louis) held a bizarre seance with faltering West Virginia politicians last week and whipped them into an unfounded frenzy about job losses from environmental regulations.
And that is why mountaintop removal blasting began last month on historic Coal River Mountain, less than a football field away from a dangerous and weak coal slurry impoundment--to wipe out any attempt at clean energy and a healthy environment. The out-of-state coal barons want to stop the Coal River Wind Project, which would provide more jobs, more energy, more tax revenues and a healthy environment for the coalfield residents.
Will Lisa Jackson and Nancy Sutley ever find three hours in their schedules to see mountaintop removal first hand and visit Coal River Mountain?
Do they truly believe, as Sutley declared this summer:"...everybody has the right to live in a clean, healthy environment and a prosperous economy. And we're working towards that. We need to reach out to communities whose voices have been ignored and where there are disproportional impacts, whether it's environmental protection or promoting [a] clean energy economy"?- Posted in




14 Comments so far
Show AllI think there's another lobby active here, too.
The coal-fired electric utility companies like Duke. Bet they don't wanna see any damned Coal River Wind Project...
Methinks there's gonna be blood in the slurry before this is over.
From the article:
"An estimated 1.6 billion pounds of ammonium nitrate fuel explosives have ripped across the lush Appalachia mountains, as part of mountaintop removal operations, since the Obama administration took power in January."
Although comparisons with explosives dropped on Iraq would be difficult to make with any accuracy, this seems like a nation AT WAR WITH ITSELF. And the air pollution just from the explosives themselves must be horrendous.
If another country instead of corporate personhoods were doing this to us it would be called a war crime.
One more thing: where are the survivalist militias in all this. I thought they believed in "family values" yet here we have literally mountains of indigenous mountain people being dislocated and torn from their land and the land torn from the earth. Like ants on an anthill, kicked by the jack-booted cartels.
Those of us who voted for Obama for hope and change need to get over our grief and despair and self-loathing and move to the anger/organizing phase in the heiarchy of emotions after the trauma. "Fool me once..." NEVER AGAIN!
-30-
And Will THEY ever just(ly) enforce the Clean Water Act's DEADline of 1985 for ELIMINATION of such waters/wetlands' filling (i.e., NOW!)?
And where is Mr. Climate Change and Oscar winner Al Gore, once claiming to be filled with deep concern about global warming? When will he show up at a mountain top removal site and take a real stance on the ground? One wonders if he too is one of these political figures selling a package of hope and change but never really doing anything to challenge the system they are imbedded in, because that's where their real allegiances lie.
"Owl" Gore has won him an Oscar and gotten a Nobel and it's time to declare victory and start collecting honoraria to supplement the multiple millions he and Tipper inherited from Al's daddy.
Poet
Wait till the run-off from all that polluting slag starts to poison the Ohio and Mississippi water sheds. You hear that Cincinatti, St. Louis, Memphis, New Orleans and every other town and agricultural operation big and small in between?! Blind fools!
Poet
hopes in arkansas and change is at taco bell. 89 cent menu!
lisa jackson failed nj miserably and now she is doing it
to the whole country. obama's been bought and paid for
since his ill. days and this folks is just another day
at the office.
Ah, you progressives are always whining about mountaintop removal, the melting of the Arctic ice, and Obama's duplicity and perfidy with regard to environmental issues. You fail to understand the Shakespearean grandeur of Obama's actions:
"Oh God! That one might read the book of fate,
And see the revolution of the times,
Make mountains level, and the continent,
Weary of solid firmness, melt itself
Into the sea."
From Henry V (1599) I, ii.
liberals fall for the democrats promises again, like every other election! Hope and Change! Hey, you guys cried on Nov 4th. you got what you wanted!
Sioux Rose
I find it so painful to read these articles. One can almost see the bejeweled body of the grand Earth Mother rendered into a skeletal carcass as ecosystem by ecosystem is raped, robbed, burned, blasted, or otherwise destroyed. Had the virtues of Venus, the capacity to share and care been taught in lieu of envy, competition, and dog-eat-dog MAN against MAN rites of societal passage, we might have better preserved this great Eden/garden. The few Indigenous Americans who contribute to this forum carry a legacy of a way of living that did not cannibalize the life force upon which it depended. They have much to teach us. Instead, an impossible ugliness and brutality results from spiritually bankrupt values applied to callously efficient technologies. To witness the death of mountains is not unlike looking directly into the abyss, and to experience on a visceral level all that's been lost, tossed and never (not for many millions of years, if then) to return would no doubt turn these careerists around. Only the hardest of hearts could still participate in the grand lifeless masquerades constituted by modern life, play "deciders" like gods having looked at the unspeakable. Unfortunately most in high-placed positions lack the substances of inner worth (or spiritual empathy) to sense what's being so blithely disregarded, when not utterly destroyed.
That was a very sensitive and eloquent response, Sioux Rose.
Regarding your reference to Venus and your emphasis on MAN: I think it's a mistake to view men as generally callous and aggressive and women as caring and compassionate. There are barbaric men and barbaric women, as there are kind men and kind women. It's true that young men are much more prone to violence than young women, but macho young men find as many women to admire and love them as do any other men.
Women could probably put a quick stop to all wars by refusing to have sex with any man who participates in war. Maybe you can start a movement ...
Sioux Rose
JOHN: There are structural problems with the linear nature of the English language, added to the prejudices we have all been thoroughly soaked in, by, and through across many generations. With that being said, I often refer to archetypal energy and realize it is not exclusive to either gender. However, up until very recently, women were not recruited into the military, and thus the martial manipulation of culture was aimed at males, young men in particular. The rites of passage often involved acts of cruelty, macho quests for strength invoked in brutal forms of combat, conquest, or competition. I do NOT see the world through a polarized prism, although it's obvious there are two genders. Using the Divine circle as my reference, there are 12 archetypal expressions. The Yin and Yang of it includes 6 variations on each "gender" theme. I have frequently put forth the proposition that the archetype of MARS is too much with U.S. and I believe the amount of $ the US spends on weapons, war, and designing yet more agents of death substantiates my case with FACTS.
The soul is neutral, and therefore all males own feminine traits and vice versa. For a female to "get ahead" (the terminology--a HEAD connotes the part of the body, head, that is said to associate with Aries, the sign ruled by Mars) in today's Mars-rules nexus, she must demonstrate traits that match the criteria the elites value. Therefore martial females like Condi Rice, Hillary Clinton, Ms. Palin and others make it to the top of the heap. Men like Father Dear, Robert Jensen, David Korten and others resonate with the more inclusive unifying, harmony-seeking, nature-respecting ethos of VENUS. Remember, these principles are not exclusive to each gender, yet society tends to condition the female to Venus: she must BE beautiful to be of worth; while society conditions the male to resonate with MARS: he must be HARD and strong, and NOT show any "sissy" emotions or become a "girlie man," etc.
I'd have thought for the many times I have delineated these differences you would have noticed. Nonetheless, I hope I have made the distinction(s) clear this time.
And OLEMAN RIVER was referring to Lysastrada, a myth I find quite intriguing. If memory serves me well the women gave in first! I have certainly known men who had performance anxieties and would look for ways to avoid sex... through the long legacy of history, when women were forced into bonds (thus only faithful to one man) and therefore had no basis for comparison (in lovemaking skills) insecure men were made far more secure than may be the case these days. (That comment is not aimed at you, John, it's generic.) So the Lysastrada model might actually allow some men a breather!
I think Lisa and Nancy are probably taking the "If Mohammad can't go to the mountain, let the mountain come to Mohammad" approach.
(No offense or disrespect intended, conservative Muslim readers; it's just an old expression.)
I expect that Massey et al will present them with custom-designed indoor tabletop "Zen Gardens", cleverly incorporating materials obtained from the annihilated mountain tops!
Nice people doing nice things.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Hey John Mitchell---
You wrote to Sioux:
"Women could probably put a quick stop to all wars by refusing to have sex with any man who participates in war."
Since you earlier so brilliantly quote Shakespeare, you must know there is an old Greek play on precisely that theme.
***
Meanwhile, Obedient Servant's remark, "I think Lisa and Nancy are probably taking the "If Mohammad can't go to the mountain, let the mountain come to Mohammad" approach," contains the seeds of direct action:
Why not a bucket brigade that dumps a mountain of coal sludge on the capitol steps? And another to poison the White House lawn...
-30-
You're referring to "Lysistrata" by Aristophanes, in which Lysistrata convinces the women of Athens and Sparta to withhold sex from their husbands until they sign a peace treaty.
My seeming erudition is mostly fake, though. I happened to stumble across the Shakespeare quote in a book of scientific quotations (of all places) shortly before reading this article. And after you mentioned the play, I learned about Lysistrata from an internet search :--)
The description of the play at http://www.sparknotes.com/drama/lysistrata/summary.html contains this funny part:
"Delegations from both states then meet at the Akropolis to discuss peace. At this point, all of the men have full erections."
I remember reading a news report some time ago about the wives and girlfriends of gang members in Columbia (as I recall) refusing to have sex with their men until they stopped fighting. The news report said that the amount of fighting dropped precipitously. I don't know if the peace lasted, though.