Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
J Street Grows, But Can It Change the Game?
A new liberal Washington lobby comes of age at its first annual conference.
WASHINGTON, DC - The 18-month old liberal "pro-Israel, pro-peace" Washington lobby, J Street, went into its first annual conference with huge momentum and a major news spotlight that only grew with the event itself. Expecting 1000 participants, its venues overflowed at Washington's Grand Hyatt Hotel with an announced total of 1,500 registrants. Most sessions were mobbed; this reporter was closed out of one and twice could hardly find a piece of wall to lean on, let alone a seat.
J Street has grown from a founding staff of four to 30 today. It absorbed the student-oriented Union of Progressive Zionists (founded by left-Zionist groups several years ago) as its youth arm and renamed it "J Street U." About 250 J Street U activists had just concluded its national meeting and were very much in evidence at the larger event.
In the weeks prior to the conference, J Street completed negotiations to ally with Brit Tzedek V'Shalom (the Jewish Alliance for Justice and Peace), which has a "grassroots" following in 30 local chapters. It will serve J Street as its field arm, with a possible name change.
Jeremy Ben-Ami, J Street's founder and executive director, delineated the group's three major objectives as: upholding the "right of the Jewish people to a state in the land of Israel," the "right of Palestinians to a state of Palestine," and that "the U.S. should help." He spoke of being "pro-Israel, not anti-somebody else." The conference frequently echoed with words about "inclusiveness," "widening the tent" and how being "pro-Israel" requires being "pro-Palestine."
J Street designated approximately 20 peace-oriented Zionist or human rights organizations in the United States and Israel as "partners," with a number presiding over concurrent breakout sessions, on such issues as settlements in occupied territories and Israel's social problems. Among the more than 100 speakers listed were a number of Arab-American community leaders, Palestinians from the territories, and the Jordanian ambassador.
The "host committee" of 160 members of Congress dropped to 148, due to alarms raised by The Weekly Standard and Commentary on J Street's alleged anti-Israel positions, and the refusal of Michael Oren, Israel's ambassador to the United States, to attend. The Israeli embassy's press statement explained that it "has been privately communicating its concerns over certain policies of the organization that may impair the interests of Israel." The most prominent of the six Democrats scared off were New York's two Senators, Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand; of seven Republicans, all but one dropped out-Rep. Boustany of Louisiana, who appeared on a panel with three Democratic House colleagues.
But both Israel's head of state, President Shimon Peres, and the leader of the parliamentary opposition, Kadima party chair Tzipi Livni, sent friendly greetings. And a number of former and current members of the Knesset from the Kadima, Labor and Meretz parties spoke on various panels.
J Street received the apparent support of the White House, with a speech by National Security Adviser James L. Jones emphasizing how President Obama shares J Street's stand for the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel as the firmest guarantee of Israel's security. While Obama appeared personally at last year's AIPAC conference, it must be regarded as a coup that his 4th ranking foreign affairs official (after Obama, Biden and Clinton) was allowed by the White House to deliver what J Street, the new kid on the block, billed as the keynote address.
Yet J Street's nuanced "pro-Israel, pro-peace" agenda is attacked from the center and left, as well as the right. At a packed plenary session, Ben-Ami politely debated Rabbi Eric Yaffie, an otherwise liberal Reform Jewish leader who had criticized J Street's opposition to Israel's recent Gaza offensive and its preference for diplomacy over sanctions regarding Iran and the nuclear issue. They also differed on the Goldstone Report, with Ben-Ami favoring an independent commission in Israel to investigate allegations of "war crimes" in Gaza-as called for by Deputy Prime Minster Dan Meridor, and like the one that forced Ariel Sharon to resign as defense minister for "indirect responsibility" for the massacre of Palestinian civilians at two refugee camps near Beirut in 1982.
Two days prior to the conference, journalist Jeffrey Goldberg published on his blog at The Atlantic website a transcript of his contentious phone conversation with Ben-Ami. Goldberg, a proponent of the war in Iraq, had chastised Ben-Ami for not "renouncing" support from Stephen Walt, co-author with John Mearsheimer of a book that blames the "Israel Lobby" for that conflict. While Ben-Ami sees their thesis as resembling "conspiracy theories contained in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion," he wouldn't renounce Walt because this "smacks of witch-hunts and thought-police."
Still, in defending his pro-Israel credentials with Goldberg, Ben-Ami's words became fodder for critics on the left-wing blogosphere-such as Max Blumenthal, Helena Cobban, Philip Weiss and Richard Silverstein-whom Ben-Ami actually accommodated at the conference with a room for an unofficial panel discussion during the first day's lunch break (J Street even supplied them, as it did all participants that day, with free food and drinks). He drew the bloggers' ire in part by saying to Goldberg: "I hope we get attacked from the left because I would characterize J Street as the mainstream of the American Jewish community."
Ben-Ami would argue that if he can show the president and Congress of the United States that most American Jews support a strong and consistent effort to end the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians through diplomacy, this helps everyone in the end.
- Posted in

17 Comments so far
Show AllThe expression "progressive zionist" is an oxymoron if there ever was one.
q
Indeed, just like progressive and the D party. You cannot be an imperialist and progressive at the same time.
You are right.
Precisely what I was thinking. Could this be a psyops like the Lerner piece which conveniently fails to attack fascist Israeli practices and the war criminals involved? It's fine and dandy to talk of peace but it means nothing if you don't demand law enforcement at the national level. It smells like a psyops. I hope I'm wrong but if no condemnation of Israeli AND USA war policies are forthcoming, it's just a snow job.
True. Effectively J-Street is a Late-Street, in essence a psyops move. Israel may have an A-bomb or two, and it may kill, but it is an anachronism. The debate has moved past what they say we must all talk about. In Palestine it is no longer about how people can respect each other. It is about how they can help each other.
Again effectively, there is already one state there. The Israeli Jews are a devious gang with stupid but wealthy friends in the USA. They are robbing and stealing all the wealth and accentuating differences.
Put them and their international helpers in prison. If this means doing a Gaza on them so be it.
Then enable the people of Greater Palestine to get on with their common interests. It may take a while for them to find them and guidance will be needed but there are very clever and good people there.
Not another penny to or from Israel until,
they disarm their nuclear weapons and
give Palestine back to the Palestinians.
I'm tired of hearing about Israel as if it's the 51st state,
though a seemly match
with the day to day military operations
backed by a nuclear arsenal.
I agree, but 95% plus of both Houses support Israel unconditionally. The Empire supports Israel unconditionally and the new Emperor pledged his unconditional loyalty to Israel at an address to AIPAC before he came to power. He even promised Israel an additional 30 BILLION over the coming years.
So, I am afraid Israel will continue to receive 10 bil, or more a year in subsidies from the Empire.
Though way overdue, J Street is a positive development and needed counterweight to AIPAC (whom for all intents and purposes, are an American auxiliary of the Likud party).
Unfortunately, they have a long way to go before they can begin to approach AIPAC's access and reach in Congress.
This is an overdue and positive development that appears to be gaining steam. However, as already pointed out, J street groups do not have the connections, clout, or influence, and especially, the financial backing that AIPAC and allied groups have.
It is in the interests of the MIC and the Empire to continue the status quo in the ME. The interests who run the show have no incentive to do so.
I agree with Buck....but with no money until Israel complies with ALL UN resolutions...and grants the right to return.
Ooops - and I almost forgot - makes reparations to all survivors(or their families) and the families of the 137 murdered by Israel during the cowardly attack on the USS Liberty in 1968! !
But I could be wrong !
I agree with both of you.
Well said.
Let's hope that J Street comes into its own when the old, intransigent Israeli warriors such as Ariel Sharon, Bejamin Netanyahu, et al. have disappeared from the political scene and younger Jews see that the repetitive cycles of kill and avenge aka 'might makes right' have brought peace no closer in the Middle East than it was in 1966. In spite of great human rights deprivation, the Palestinians are remarkably
resilient and even more, are incredibly hopeful considering all that has been done to assure their bitterness and hostility.
Younger generations of hopeful American Jews and Israelis see the possibilities for co-existence to which the old Zionists (and settlers, of course) seem hopelessly blind. I applaud the development of J Street.
Kudos to the 148 members of Congress who attended the conference notwithstanding the considerable pressure that AIPAC was certain to have brought to bear on them.
Congratulations to J Street for giving Jewishness a good name.
Forgive me, but I can't share the sentiment,
not believing in organized religion.
The quest is personal.
Religious organizations are in the same class as
and operate on the same level as
governmental organizations;
hierarchies
that intertwine,
the source of great lies
consumed by the herds and flocks
before being butchered and fleeced.
Sorry
Bring America Back !!!!
***J Street did a poll and study which showed that over 70%
of Jews in America overwhelmingly support the Israel offensive at Gaza, with the accompanying 1500 dead, including
300 innocent children !!!!
**At the time of the study J-Street expressed no view of its own on the Genocide.
***Re: the last paragraph of this article, it is then
questionable how J Street or its American constituency will be able to treat Palestine as equal in the Peace Process !!!
REMEMBER GAZA !!!!
TruthKnoller: J-Street's March 2009 poll results on the Gaza questions reads as follows----------
"The results of the poll also demonstrate a sophisticated set of views on the latest conflict in Gaza. While American Jews - by three to one - "approved" of the recent military action that Israel took in Gaza, they also realize by 59 to 41 percent that it had either no effect on Israel's security or in fact made it less secure. These views track J Street's position on Gaza, which recognized that while Israel's actions were justifiable and understandable, they did not benefit Israel's long-term security."
They add that they "recognize that military force alone doesn't necessarily enhance security, and are ready to engage with rather than isolate those with whom we have conflicts."
When I have written J-Street about my strong belief that Israel is a war-criminal and terroristic state, they have not disagreed and have affirmed more than once their requirement that justice for the Palestinians be part of any Middle East solution.
Complete poll results are at www.jstreet.org.