Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Risks and Returns: Exploiting the Immigrant Detention Industry
Two recent articles in the Boston Review and Texas Observer reflect on violent uprisings at the Reeves County Detention Center in Pecos last December and January. Tom Barry and Forrest Wilder describe a system of calculated lawlessness in the heart of Dixie.
The clash was driven by detainees’ protests about inhumane conditions, particularly poor medical care and overcrowding. The catalyst was the death of Jesus Galindo, an epileptic who had been isolated in solitary confinement. Immigrant detention has become a political flashpoint for the Obama administration amid reports of abuse and miserably inadequate healthcare.
Although the White House recently pledged to improve detention conditions, there's been little real questioning of the economic underpinnings of the system. The Pecos rebellion illustrated the consequences of marrying America's prison-industrial complex with zero-tolerance immigration enforcement.
As he toured various “prison towns” along the U.S.-Mexico border, Barry observed that “all the prisons I saw had two common features: they were managed and operated by private-prison corporations—including two of the world’s largest, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and GEO [which runs Reeves]—and they were located in remote, rural areas, invariably described by locals as being 'in the middle of nowhere.'”
The industry, he says, capitalizes on towns hungering for economic development.
The prison industry introduces the governments of desperate communities to what some call “backdoor financing”: project revenue bonds in the tens of millions of dollars that suddenly make them feel like economic players....
The full cost of the public-private immigrant prisons that now litter the Southwest and elsewhere is not yet known. Most counties and municipalities are still ten to fifteen years away from paying off the bonds.
The private detention sector works much like the crooked lenders who drove the country into financial crisis, building facilities as “speculative” ventures.
Though business slumped during the 1990s, CCA struck gold with the Bush administration's anti-immigrant crackdowns. Reporting on the Hutto family detention center, Margaret Talbot wrote in the New Yorker, “When immigration detention started its precipitate climb following 9/11, private prison companies eagerly offered their empty beds, and the industry was revitalized.”
Wilder describes how the detention boom-bust cycle works in a cash-strapped Texas town:
In the mid-1980s, with the regional economy devastated by the Texas oil bust, local business and government leaders decided to move into a recession-proof industry that was exploding in an increasingly criminalized America: prisons. In 1986, the county built a 300-bed prison. The prison filled rapidly with federal inmates, pumping revenue into the county’s budget and adding decent-paying jobs to the local work force. By 2002, Reeves had 2,000 beds. In 2003, the county completed construction on a $39 million, 960-bed unit only to find that the feds had no interest....
While the prison sat empty, payments on the bonds, reduced to junk status, were coming due. On the verge of default, county officials begged the Bush administration to send prisoners and hired Randy DeLay, former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay’s brother, to lobby in Washington, D.C. That’s when Wackenhut Corrections Corp., now GEO Group, rode to the rescue. In November 2003, GEO agreed to take over management of the whole 3,000-bed prison complex and soon struck a deal with the Bureau of Prisons to fill the new unit.
Now cut to winter 2008. Jesus Galindo, a 32-year-old Mexican American who was caught crossing the border illegally, desperately needed careful treatment for his epilepsy, Wilder reports. Instead, he got locked up in solitary and spiraled toward his death. An autopsy traced the death to his epilepsy and noted signs of medical neglect.
According to a report by the National Immigration Forum, it's unclear exactly how many private entities are working under Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but prison corporations are well fed by federal largess.
The $1.7 billion budget for “Custody Operations” provides ICE with funding to maintain its current detention capacity of 33,400 people in over 500 facilities on any given night, including operational expenses....
The two largest private prison companies in the U.S. each receive over ten percent of their revenue directly from ICE, which pays an average per diem fee of $87.99 for every immigrant detainee.
All this despite the Obama administration's acknowledgement that most detainees pose no real public danger. Many could in fact be monitored safely outside prison at a far lower cost to taxpayers. Nonetheless, ICE pushed privatization as a revenue-boosting scheme in its initial budget proposal for fiscal year 2010.
Even in the midst of a recession, the detention market is looking bullish. Just as Homeland Security announced its detention reform initiatives earlier this month, Business of Detention project reported, CCA unveiled a brand new 500-bed facility in Gainesville, Georgia.
A company spokesperson boasted, “Our positive impact, for more than a decade, on the State of Georgia is considerable, in terms of bringing strong careers to hard-working Georgians and much needed taxes and local dollars.”
Profit-driven immigrant detention is just one facet of a much larger epidemic that is destroying poor communities of color across the country. Yet Pecos is an especially striking display of the cruel economics of mass incarceration.
The detainees, as well as those running their prisons, have more in common than they probably know. As economic desperation propels migrants to seek work across the border, impoverished American communities, which are conditioned to dehumanize immigrant workers, gravitate toward a prison business underwritten by draconian federal laws.
And so the machine whirs on, muffling the cries of immigrants like Galindo. Once they're inside, it seems, no one has to listen anymore.
- Posted in



12 Comments so far
Show AllWell,
You miss the point. The scumbags are the ones supporting these hellholes. That way they can more effectively control and abuse the workers and pay them even less by holding out the threat of such detention as the alternative.
remember NAFTA? Shoved down our throats by US corporations looking for cheaper labor than unionized US workers. NAFTA ruined the farming industry of Mexico and provided only less than subsistence jobs in the factories which blossomed just south of the border.
Check the stats for workers migrating looking for sustainable work before and after NAFTA implementation.
It is still happening - check the number of manufacturing jobs still being exported.
None of this justifies the less than human industry created to mis treat these human beings whose distress is caused by US sponsored NAFTA's failed economic model.
I guess that the guv is saving the KBR-built concentra..er 'illegal immigration detention centers for US citizens who will take to the streets eventually to overturn the controlling oligarchy who places death and profits above all else.
How do you go from "give me your tired,your hungry,your masses yearning to be free" to locking people up for profit?Tony
That's for people entering the United States legally. Got it?
wasn:t cheney and alberto gonzalez indicted last december
for this? does anyone have any new info on this? this
was a state indictment in texas and the prosecutor had
to be dragged into court by the bailiff to unseal the
charges. the judge threatened to jail the the prosecutor
on contempt of court charges. cheney must have threatened
to have him killed if he did.
wasn:t cheney and alberto gonzalez indicted last december
for this? does anyone have any new info on this? this
was a state indictment in texas and the prosecutor had
to be dragged into court by the bailiff to unseal the
charges. the judge threatened to jail the the prosecutor
on contempt of court charges. cheney must have threatened
to have him killed if he did.
This has been an ongoing problem and there is more to this than the article describes.
Remember the two judges, in Pennsylvania I believe it was, that were sentencing juveniles convicted on very minor charges to private corrections facilities that were giving the judges kickbacks for each offender sent to these facilities? Well, the same shit happened with the Hutto Immigration Facility. There was a local judge who had a large amount of stock in Wackenhut (now Geo Corrections) that was sending illegal immigrant families to the Hutto facility in which he owned shares. These families were subject to horrendous conditions, with minors being separated from adult family members and housed with other adults, inmates sexually and physically abused, etc. He was eventually caught, but whatever happened to him for this crime against humanity was apparently a mere slap on the wrist as I never saw any followup as to his punishment for creating his own personal gain from the misery of others.
The corrections "industry", just like health insurance, has no business whatsoever in the "for profit" world. The very simple fact that proper expenses for qualified employees and proper housing, medical care, and nourishment flies right in the face of the "profit" motive makes for profit prisons implausable. Further, and officials such as judges should be prohibited by law from owning any financial interest in the for profit prison industry. Violaters of this law should or those who receive kickbacks for using for profit prisons should be subject to their own fucking prison for a very long time. That this goes on without more public exposure is a crime in itself and there is no reason whatsoever for a "for profit" prison industry to exist except to enrich those who exploit those who are the most exploitable, which is no reason at all.
It's interesting that Georgia's economy is so strong on prisons and military academies.
The British control of Georgia started as a military struggle between the Spanish colonial capitol in St Augustine, and the South Carolina capitol of Charles Town. After the Spaniards had been pushed out, the British decided that Georgia was a good place to send their poor, who were over-populating the debtors prisons.
So having a prison build-up in Georgia seems right in line with history.