Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
In Defense of the ‘Balloon Boy’ Dad
FOR a country desperate for good news, the now-deflated "balloon boy" spectacle would seem to be the perfect tonic. As Wolf Blitzer of CNN summed up the nation's unrestrained joy upon learning that the imperiled boy had never been in any peril whatsoever: "All of us are so excited that little Falcon is fine."
Then came even better news. After little Falcon revealed to Blitzer that his family "did this for the show," we could all luxuriate in a warm bath of moral superiority. No matter what our own faults as parents, we could never top Richard Heene, who mercilessly exploited his child for fame and profit. Nor could we ever be as craven as the news media, especially cable television, which dumped a live broadcast of President Obama in New Orleans to track the supersized Jiffy Pop bag floating over Colorado.
Or such are the received lessons of this tale.
Certainly the "balloon boy" incident is a reflection of our time - much as the radio-induced "War of the Worlds" panic dramatized America's jitters on the eve of World War II, or the national preoccupation with the now-forgotten Congressman Gary Condit signaled America's pre-9/11 drift into escapism and complacency in the summer of 2001. But to see what "balloon boy" says about 2009, you have to look past the sentimental moral absolutes. You have to muster some sympathy for the devil of the piece, the Bad Dad. And you can't grant blanket absolution to those in the American audience who smugly blame Heene and television exclusively for the entire embarrassing episode.
It would be lovely, for instance, to believe that cable audiences doubled in size that afternoon because they were rooting for little Falcon's welfare. But as Seth Meyers and Amy Poehler would say on Weekend Update at "Saturday Night Live," "Really?!?" Many of those viewers were driven by the same bloodlust that spawns rubberneckers at every highway accident: the hope of witnessing the graphic remains of a crash, not a soft landing.
It would also be nice to think that the "balloon boy" viewers were the innocent victims of a dazzling Houdini-class feat of wizardry - a "massive fraud," as Bill O'Reilly thundered. But even slightly jaundiced onlookers might have questioned how a balloon could waft buoyantly through the skies for hours with a 6-year-old boy hidden within its contours. That so few did is an indication of how practiced we are at suspending disbelief when watching anything labeled news, whether the subject is W.M.D.'s in Iraq or celebrity gossip in Hollywood.
"They put on a very good show for us, and we bought it," the local sheriff, Jim Alderden, said last weekend, when he alleged that "balloon boy" was a hoax. His words could stand as the epitaph for an era.
In this case, the show wasn't even that good. But, as usual, the news media nursed it along, enlisting as sales reps for the smoke and mirrors. While the incident unfolded, most TV anchors hyped rather than questioned the aeronautical viability of a vehicle resembling the flying saucers in Ed Wood's camp 1950s sci-fi potboiler, "Plan 9 From Outer Space." But no sooner had the balloon been punctured than the press was caught in another flimflam. Reuters and CNBC delivered the bombshell that the United States Chamber of Commerce had abruptly reversed its intransigent opposition to climate-change legislation. The "spokesperson" source turned out to be the invention of liberal activists who had attempted to stage a prank press conference at Washington's National Press Club.
Next to the other hoaxes and fantasies that have been abetted by the news media in recent years, both the "balloon boy" and Chamber of Commerce ruses are benign. The Colorado balloon may have led to the rerouting of flights and the wasteful deployment of law enforcement resources. But at least it didn't lead the country into fiasco the way George W. Bush's flyboy spectacle on an aircraft carrier helped beguile most of the Beltway press and too much of the public into believing that the mission had been accomplished in Iraq. The Chamber of Commerce stunt was a blip of a business news hoax next to the constant parade of carnival barkers who flogged empty stocks on cable during the speculative Wall Street orgies of the dot-com and housing booms.
As "balloon boy" played out, the White House opened fire on one purveyor of fictional news, Fox News, where "tea party" protests are inflated into a national rebellion rivaling the Civil War and where Glenn Beck routinely claims Obama is perpetrating a conspiracy to bring fascism to America. But the White House's argument is diluted by the different, if less malevolently partisan, fictions that turn up on Fox's competitors. On CNN, for instance, Lou Dobbs provided a platform for the nuts questioning Obama's citizenship. When an ABC News correspondent insisted that Fox was "one of our sister organizations" in an exchange with the president's press secretary, Robert Gibbs, last week, he wasn't joking.
Richard Heene is the inevitable product of this reigning culture, where "news," "reality" television and reality itself are hopelessly scrambled and the warp-speed imperatives of cable-Internet competition allow no time for fact checking. Norman Lear, about the only prominent American to express any empathy for little Falcon's father, vented on The Huffington Post, calling out CNN, MSNBC, Fox, NBC, ABC and CBS alike for their role in "creating a climate that mistakes entertainment for news." This climate, he argued, "all but seduces a Richard and Mayumi Heene into believing they are - even if what they dream up to qualify is a hoax - entitled to their 15 minutes."
None of this absolves Heene of blame for the damage he may have inflicted on the children he grotesquely used as a supporting cast in his schemes. But stupid he's not. He knew how easy it would be to float "balloon boy" when the demarcation between truth and fiction has been obliterated.
There's also some poignancy in his determination to grab what he and many others see as among the last accessible scraps of the American dream. As a freelance construction worker and handyman, he couldn't find much employment in an economy where construction is frozen and homeowners are more worried about losing their homes than fixing them. Once his appetite had been whetted by two histrionic appearances on "Wife Swap," an ABC reality program, it's easy to see why Heene would turn his life and that of his family into a nonstop audition for more turns in the big tent of the reality media circus.
That circus is among the country's last dependable job engines. More than a quarter of prime-time broadcast television is devoted to reality programs. And so, with only a high-school education, Heene tried to reinvent himself as a cable-ready tornado-chasing scientist. Robert Thomas, a Web entrepreneur who collaborated with Heene on a pitch to ABC for a science-based reality show, saw the "balloon boy" stunt as a sad response to his economic plight. "I think in this case the desperation was too much for Richard to bear," Thomas said in an interview with Gawker.com. (It's no less desperate a sign of the times that Thomas insisted on being paid for his interview.)
Heene is a direct descendant of those Americans of the Great Depression who fantasized, usually in vain, that they might find financial salvation if only they could grab a spotlight in show business. Some aspired to the "American Idol" of the day - "Major Bowes Amateur Hour," a hugely popular weekly talent contest on network radio. Others traveled the seedy dance marathon circuit, entering 24/7 endurance contests that promised food and prize money in exchange for freak-show degradation and physical punishment. Horace McCoy's 1935 novel memorializing this Depression milieu was aptly titled "They Shoot Horses, Don't They?"
In 1939, the year that John Steinbeck published "The Grapes of Wrath," his Depression classic about dispossessed Dust Bowl sharecroppers migrating to California's Salinas Valley in search of work, Nathanael West published "The Day of the Locust," about those equally destitute Americans who traveled to Hollywood hoping to land in the movies. "They have been cheated and betrayed," West wrote. "They have slaved and saved for nothing." He could have been describing Americans who lost their jobs, homes and 401(k)'s in our own Great Recession.
The role models for today's desperate fame seekers are "Jon & Kate Plus 8," not Gable and Lombard. But even if they catch a break, as Heene did on "Wife Swap," they still may end up betrayed by a stacked system. As The Times reported in August, many reality shows are as cruel as the old dance marathons. The usual Hollywood workplace rules allowing breaks for rest or meals often don't apply. Nor, sometimes, does the minimum wage. Let 'em eat fame.
If Heene's balloon was empty, so were the toxic financial instruments, inflated by the thin air of unsupported debt, that cratered the economy he inhabits. The press hyped both scams, and the public eagerly bought both. But between the bogus balloon and the banks' bubble, there's no contest as to which did the most damage to the country. The ultimate joke is that Heene, unlike the reckless gamblers at the top of Citigroup and A.I.G., may be the one with a serious shot at ending up behind bars.




35 Comments so far
Show AllMr. Rich, when speaking of media hoax spectacles, please don't forget the three buildings that fell in surreal fashion while all cameras were rolling. Americans will eat excrement if told it's potatoes.
Rich failed to address the worst crime that Heene commited...child abuse.
Watching Falcon barf on TV is clearly the result of this inexcusable incident of child abuse.
Correct,raydelcamino, it is one thing to have our children grow up as liars as a result of mimicking our bad behavior but many times worse to directly instruct them to lie about a specific event. This is overt abuse at it's worst.
Exactly right, Buck!
Frank gets it exactly right in pointing out how deceit is used by humans, how the public perception is manipulated, and how easily misled we are.
But of course Frank does not think, or at least will not say, that such a ruse was employed on 11 September.
He is not ignorant, so he must be in denial.
Why waste time bothering to watch the glitzy media? If everyone stopped watching TV for a week, Corporate America would actually collapse sooner and the better.
There may be some hope. I've actually met 2 or 3 people who have given up the cable/satellite for a converter box. But it's a long row to hoe. People who complain about media sex & violence should consider "Turn it off and stop buying their crap"
Amen sister ! I call it one form of guaranteed "single payer" government cannot deny. :)
I'll probably be going the other way. I had satellite TV for several years. I mainly watched Free Speech TV, Link TV, the Discovery channel, History channel, UC Berkeley TV, and of course the Daily Show and Colbert Report. So basically for the most part educational stuff.
This year we have to watch our finances, and so no longer have satellite TV and are watching the over the air channels. Aside from PBS, I am personally stunned as to how stupid most of this programming drivel is. Some days I feel like it is actually sucking my brains out through my eye sockets.
So hopefully we will be back on budget next year so I can change my boob-tube back into something that is at least somewhat useful to me.
You can watch The Daily Show and Colbert Report on their websites the next day. I believe Link TV has much of its programming online too, but I don't know how much.
I have mixed results with viewing things via the net. Sometimes it works fine, sometimes it keeps locking up. I guess my results depend on how many of my neighbors are trying to download porn at the same time. ;-)
Spectacles like this should come as no surprise in a country where the majority of people willingly bought the official story of what happened on September 11th, 2001.
I'm not sure I buy the official story, but I'm pretty sure I don't buy most if not all of the inside job conspiracy theories. I do believe that high level officials ignored warnings whether intentional or not, I'm not sure.
I'm not one to knock conpiracy theories in general, either (e.g. I don't believe Oswald killed Kennedy).
9-11 was definitely an inside job. Too much evidence to ignore. Even Max Cleland said the 9-11 commission was all lies. Israel and our neo-cons aided and abetted this extreme crime.
Hell, even Thomas Keane himself, the Chair of the Commission, has said the Commission Report was a list of lies they were told to print by the Bush Administration.
cdo74, I am with you on your feelings about 9/11. Bush's reaction at the school to the attack seems to demonstrate complete cluelessness, and not the actions of an insider to a conspiracy.
To me it is completely plausible that warnings were intentionally ignored concerning the 9/11 attacks either out of hubris, or the thought that some minor terrorist event could be used to their advantage. But to allow the destruction of the Trade Center and Pentagon would be like a beast biting off it's own head, and right arm. It just wouldn't do something like that.
I would buy an "inside job" possibility more if the attack was on the 9th ward of New Orleans. The Bush administration made it very clear what it thought of poor folks. But the love affair both parties have with big business would not allow them to even think of allowing their possible destruction. They are to be protected at all costs, the recent bailouts are perfect examples of that.
We don't have television ever since the switch to HD and don't miss it. But we did hear about the little boy vomiting on two of the shows. That little boy was under tremendous stress. But he managed to tell the truth and blessings to him.
"But the White House's argument is diluted by the different, if less malevolently partisan, fictions that turn up on Fox's competitors. On CNN, for instance, Lou Dobbs provided a platform for the nuts questioning Obama's citizenship. When an ABC News correspondent insisted that Fox was "one of our sister organizations" in an exchange with the president's press secretary, Robert Gibbs, last week, he wasn't joking."
Oh yeah, Frank Rich gets it.
But curiously absent is the leading role the NYT played in Bush's 2000 selection by smearing Gore, and providing Bush and co. the cheerleading squad to invade Iraq.
As sent to the NYT --- we'll have to wait to see if they post it:
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
October 25th, 2009
9:29 am
Frank Rich is correct that Henne is much, much less heinous than the ruling-elite corporate/financial EMPIRE ----- and Henne seeks publicity, while the EMPIRE, which now almost fully controls our country, hides behind the facade of its two-party 'Vichy' sham of democracy (aided by its equally 'Vichy' media).
But if Rich is correct, Glenn Beck is “bending it” -- but not like Beckham --- regarding the real nature of this new style fascism.
Beck notes an insufficient point when he says that this new fascism has replaced communism. But he misses the significance that Dylan Ratigan reflects in the term "Corporate Communism", namely, that the 21st century corporate/financial EMPIRE is an equal opportunity schemer, hiding behind the curtain of 20th century ideological pathologies of both the right and left.
This new release of disguised ruling-elite global EMPIRE is best understood as 'Vichy' Release 2.0:
http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarymanage.php?submit=view&did=14698
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
This was, without doubt, another attempt by the rightwing media to interrupt our glorious leader as he was in the middle of more beautiful speechifieing on how was going to rise N"Orleans from the rubble and mess of the evil "W" and remind us once again how the Federal Government (like God himself) helps those who help themselves and believe me we sure see a lot of people helping themselves.
Someone should email Frank Rich today's CD essay by Harvey Wasserman on the NY Times role in aiding and abetting the Pentagon warmongers in pushing for a deep US plunge into the abyss of Afghanistan and even Pakistan. As Wasserman details, the Times' editors and reporters like Judith Miller and Thomas Friedman acted as uncritical stenographers, indeed cheerleaders for the endless lies and fabrications of the Bush/Cheney/Powell/Rice/Rumsfeld criminal gang in the propaganda buildup to the full scale attack on Iraq. Now the Times crew, minus Judith Miller, are doing a repeat performance in the Af-Pak debate. As Wasserman wisely points out, if the bankrupt US plunges ever deeper into endless Middle East wars costing a trillion or two, all domestic spending priorities will fall by the wayside. It then becomes all too easy to see a future US resembling Orwell's nightmare 1984 vision of life in Oceania: a total police state of endless surveillance amid never ending wars and rumors of wars and a barely survivable standard of living for the majority. As Petraeus and McChrystal advisor, David Kilcullen, writes of a necessary "long war" lasting 50 to 100 years, and possibly extending even into Europe, it is clear that such military mentalities are indeed planning a future of endless wars and they care nothing for the consequences for the hapless civilians of the war zones nor the domestic US priorities. Rich should turn his attention from the corporate media focus on balloon boy distractions to how his own paper aids and abets the warfare state juggernaut of death and destruction.
You wrote: "It then becomes all too easy to see a future US resembling Orwell's nightmare 1984 vision of life in Oceania: a total police state of endless surveillance amid never ending wars and rumors of wars and a barely survivable standard of living for the majority..."
That sounds a bit too optimistic. The US future is more likely to be a combination of Mad Max (for the rural areas in the hinterlands), Soylent Green (for the vast majority of urbanites, with the starvation, homelessness, and desperation though probably without the consumption of human bodies), and 1984 (for the upper echelons in the urban areas). Those living the life of Orwell's protagonist in that novel will be the lucky ones.
***spoilers***
"Those living the life of Orwell's protagonist in that novel will be the lucky ones."
Have you read the book?
The fictional Winston Smith was tortured until his mind was remade to love the party in power. Even Noam Chomsky suggested that this wasn't Orwell's best book (he prefered Homage to Catalonia), because it depicted the most awful totalitarian state possible.
How rude! Yes, I have read the book. My son just read it recently and we were just discussing it. The point was that it appears quite possible that a life such as that of Winston Smith, as terrible as we think that is, will be quite superior to most lives in the US in a couple of decades. An existence consisting mostly of pure chaos, starvation, and constant physical danger and discomfort actually would make Smith's life appear attractive. Political and philosophical preferences are far from the bottom of Maslow's well-designed pyramid, which sometimes seems difficult to accept for those of us living comfortable lives.
"Maxpayne" and "lostymytribe", good for you. I turned off my tv a couple of years before the HD switch and have been slowly emerging from the fog ever since. From its hypnotic flash rate to its insidious content it has numbed an American public, already narcotized by its food supply (factory-farmed, hence nutritionally deficient, then spiked with chemicals, coloring agents, HFC syrup, toxic sweeteners, and residual hormones and stimulants in the meat), and fluoride-laced water. I honestly believe that no change in this death-oriented plutocracy will be possible until people abandon the Corporate "Media" ("Minitru" in 1984) and develop an alternative forum for public discussion. Rich's parallel of the balloon story and the housing bubble is great, though as several of you correctly observe, not complete.
My wife pulled me out of watching and shouting at the tellie a few years ago just to reduce my blood pressure. As an added bonus, not getting hooked to all those poisonous junk and chemicals is enough to make me say that doing away with the tellie is one "single payer" government cannot deny. I watch Indian and Russian teleseries on the internet in place of all this.
After all said and done.
What is now best for the Boys and the Heenes? Should their father be sent to prison? Should be receive a fine he can not possibly pay?
Should the State seize the Children and have them suffer through foster homes?
Furthermore as the author of this piece alludes to.
Should Mr Heene be punished for HIS fraud while those Wall Street fraud artists rewarded for their own?
Thank God I was at work when all of this happened. Thank God I even have work for which I'm paid to do, especially in a recession.
I do think Mr. Heene is a jerk, but if he had gainful employment, would he have even put on this hoax? Would he be so unstable?
The right-wing goes on and on about family values and how the left-wing supposedly wants to destroy it, yet it's the economic policies of the right-wing and the centrists for that matter, that create turbulent homelives.
If everyone had a job at a decent wage with decent hours, and free education/health care, would there be any more broken homes? Would there even be so many reality shows? Imagine if people didn't have to work so many hours. They could spend more time with their kids and people would have time to cultivate real talents. Socialism I believe would bring about a cultural renaissance.
Unintended, Rich provides us with a look at how long the Propaganda System has worked at distracting/misleading the public, and how the "playbook" hasn't changed much from the 1930s. Orson Welles's radio broadcast "War of the Worlds" would never have gained as much noteriety if not for that type of broadcast (sensationalism, just like the Balloon Boy) having alredy gained purchase.
Rich has written about the NY Times's role in selling the Iraq Holocaust in his "The Greatest Story Ever Sold: The Decline and Fall of Truth in Bush's America." This essay builds on that. It's likely that his current story wouldn't be published if he were to include the NY Times as a part of the Propaganda System. But then, the larger truth in the essay includes the NY Times, WaPost and others, as Rich alludes to.
I think the saddest commentary is the reality show programming exists. I watch a lot of TV, none of it prime time network. Can we excuse the viewer any more than the universal soldier? You can put it on, but you can't make me watch.
Frank Rich makes excellent points. I wish we would hold the large fraudsters to account and to the same contempt as Richard Heene will suffer.
The Balloon Boy Hoax, I think we should blame Global Warming and George Bush and the rest of the Republicans. Though there is the possibility of a conspiracy, like the balloon was either remote controlled or it could have been a drone aircraft.
This hoax/conspiracy will definitely go down in history as one of the biggest, even bigger than 9-11, JFK, the Holocaust, and the Apollo Moon landings (all six of them).
I don't buy the connection between "rubbernecking" and "bloodlust"--I think rubbernecking is just natural curiosity, and that most rubberneckers are quite disturbed when they actually catch sight of something gruesome.
Tendencies for rubbernecking are virtually universal. I hope the same is not true for bloodlust.
I want to hear more about the Reptilians that inhabit human bodies and run our political, religious and financial institutions and have been around for thousands of years after traveling inter-dimensionally from the Sirius star system. Can you say David Icke???
"They put on a very good show for us, and we bought it," the local sheriff, Jim Alderden, said last weekend
Was he talking about Ballon Dad, or Obama?
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
Here they'd bust mommy/daddy for lying to the man, filing false police reports, releasing a loose balloon into airspace,
Then CPS would grab the kid.