EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- The Downwinders: Fracking Ourselves to Death in America
Popular content
Today's Top News
Challenging the Banks: Stand Up or Roll Over?
On February 1, 1960, four students sat down at a lunch counter at the former Woolworth's store in Greensboro North Carolina.
4 students! Just four!
They were protesting racial segregation. They were denied, service, harassed and arrested.
Greensboro was and still is a backwater, yet their courage and commitment sparked and helped drive a national movement that would, within a few years, transform this country.
Martin Luther King may have had the dream but they had a scheme - a way of getting attention, a way of showing that if you want to make change, you have to be willing to act.
Few us remember their names. I knew one, Joseph McNeil, because he went to my high school in the Bronx before heading to AT&T, a traditionally black college, later famous as the school at which Jesse Jackson played football.
Today there is a marker down the street from where the Woolworth's once stood. (At least there was when I was last there in the 80's.)
Woolworth's had once been one of the best-known brands in America for decades.
The chain went from fame to infamy to out of business. Lunch counters were soon out, and so was Woolworth's despite its skyscraper in downtown Manhattan. It would later be bought up, broken up, and sold off by an avaricious private equity firm, which, in a mad search for profits, drove the company under. Some stores survived in the UK and Australia but not in the USA. There used to be one across the street from where I live. It is now a GAP.
Sound familiar?
Formal segregation may be gone, even if an interracial couple couldn't get a marriage license recently in Louisiana, but class separation and inequality in America has deepened sharply. The middle class that the Greensboro 4 hoped to join as college graduates is only a memory for many.
Black communities across this country have been savaged by the foreclosure crisis. Black unemployment is twice that of whites, a figure that in real terms stands at 20% or more. That means 40% for minorities!
Millions of families are going backwards to homelessness, and insecurity. Downward mobility is now a mass phenomenon. If you don't believe me, look at your bank statement. Check out the added charges, look at your credit card
These large banks are run by the miscreants FDR called "banksters. They" are reporting super profits and giving out obscene bonuses. Their lobbyists are blocking new regulations and eroding old ones while presiding over the largest transfer of wealth in history from the working poor to the flamboyant super rich.
Racialization has been displaced by financialization. Now the "action" in the Tar Heel State is down the road in Charlotte where the Bank of America is based.
But can we still Bank On Banks Like The Bank Of America? (You may not recall but the first bank to go in the great Depression was called the Bank of the United States.)
Banks R' Us. Today, there are bank branches in almost every neighborhood - except the poorest ones where pay day lenders reign with their usury on their mind and in their interest rates. When it comes to credit, the poor pay more - and the banks know it and profit from it. There are also mortgage brokers galore in every community.
Fraud is their middle name. (I am not the only one saying this. The FBI denounces it as an "epidemic." There are arrests every week.)
The many financial institutions and sleazy lenders are there to do business but they could also become convenient targets for civic engagement.
Can they be challenged? So far, very few have been. While the Banks are agressively lobbying; citizens groups are passively sending e-mails. Never before have so many allowed so few to dominate this discourse. The banks are clearly winning over the regulators and critics. Even Barney Frank's committee has capitulated.
Never the less, protests against the big banks are beginning. There will be one at the end of October at the American Banker's Association convention and greedfest in Chicago.
But you don't have to go to "Sweet Home Chicago" to find targets of outrage, or even trek down to Wall Street. You know where you bank! True, many branches are just made up of ATM machines who want your money, not to hear from you. But the bigger branches are not far away. They advertise. They are everywhere, doing business as usual except lending to people who need it most.
Your money in; their profits out.
This could change or at least become "more challenging." Think of the Greensboro 4, just a few people then made enough noise to get things going.
Today, you don't have to call them sit-ins, just polite but firm and "protracted" conversations with the banksters. If a million people called their 800 numbers at once, what would happen? Why not informational picketing to advise consumers about how they are getting ripped off with high rates and excessive fees? Why not bring the pain of excessive debt and dispossession to the people who are causing it and profiting from it? Student loan victims, are you listening.
What if families who can't afford day care turned their favorite branches into day care centers? What if their profits and bonuses were posted neatly on their windows? What if.... (You fill in the blank!)
Lets say, concerned folks assembled at key bank branches during the noon hour - Mondays at Chase, Tuesdays at BOA, Wednesdays at Wells Fargo, Thursdays at Wachovia etc and then spent dress down Fridays at Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley?
I am sure the bankers will welcome the opportunity to "dialogue" with their enraged critics and customers. This can only work if it is done regularly, week after week. One shots won't work. They may make protesters feel good but that's all they will accomplish.
You will be surprised because the acts of a few can inspire action by the many. Think of Brian Haw, camped out in front of the Parliament in London every day since the Iraq war started in 2003. He knows we are in a marathon, not a sprint!
You get where I am going? I am not sure where Fred Douglass banked, back in the days when companies like Lehman Brothers, before its fall, were financing the slave trade, but his mantra that without struggle, nothing changes still survives.
Nothing will change without making them uncomfortable. Anger, if not ‘deployed" like an unguided missile, has its uses.
The Banksters are terrified of what they call "economic populism." I prefer to call it economic democracy. Even Barack Obama understood that years ago when he worked as a community organizer. I am not sure if he still does.
No one's going to win a Nobel Prize in Economic Fairness for this type of non-violent activity but it will bring this issue out of the back pages of the business section where it is safely buried and into the front lobes of people's minds.
Where are the activists blocking foreclosures or rallying at unemployment offices for extended benefits. Where is the push back against the health insurers? Why are you asleep?
It's so simple. The Greensboro 4 understood it decades ago. If you don't stand up, you might as well lay down.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


13 Comments so far
Show AllWhat if all students refused to pay their student loans?
The one area where the Obama Administration has been totally progressive is student loans to help out their legions of college supporters. Obama is cutting out all the private student lenders and using the $15 Billion saved to provide more college loans.
Of course they also passed the biggest successor to the GI Bill allowing veterans to
go to college.
If only Obama would be as progressive in reality on every other area.
In particular placing a cap on credit card interest at 18%.
"a cap on credit card interest at 18%"
In the old days, mafia loan sharks would blush at such rates of return. We've set the bar pretty low. Think rate of inflation plus one percent. That might put you at 4 percent.
Excellent point. What would happen if people didn't pay their unsecured loans like credit cards? If it weren't for usury interest rates, penalties and late fees, many people would have these balances at zero. I am reminded of a bank that took a poor woman to court in Ohio. When the judge tallied up her payments, he found out that she had paid for her purchases three times over yet the bank was trying to sue her for a huge amount. He threw the case out.
Force them to implement debtor's prison again.
I don't know what can possibly do about these financial institutions which I have been calling criminal conspiracies since I worked at the corporate headquarters of one of them during my misbegotten yuppie years. They are so thoroughly imbedded into our government that even a newly elected president who we thought would at least try to be kind of progressive leaves the Goldman Sachs gang largely in charge of the bailed-out banks and their use of the money taxpayers gave them.
We can't tell what's happening with "our" money. Some report record profits, some say they're losing money, and evidently no one in "our" government representing "us" can do anything other than let them do whatever they will.
They will no doubt be back pleading "too big to fail" soon, saying that if we don't fork over, the whole system will collapse.
Maybe the next wave of economic disaster and collapse will wake people up. Thanks to Danny Schechter and others who continue to do what they can to call this enormous uber-fraud to our attention.
It hit me last night, more clearly than usual:
The bottom line dilemma: the majority of us are afflicted with Greedism to one degree or another. Let's say, at 100 degrees, we got the 'financial industry,' where those with severe cases of Greedism are paid the most, because 'financial industry' Rule #1 is: enough is never, ever enough... to 0 degrees - Our Lady of Victory Carmelite Nuns.
The majority of Americans are way closer to 100 than 0. Not that there isn't a sizable minority of those either mildly or non-afflicted - just that they're but a tiny tree in the Greed forest.
This is why 'we' aren't rising up in revolt - because the only other viable economic option is not Greedism based and driven. So if we actually manage to scrap the current system and replace it with the 'right' one, we also eliminate all hopes of every owning 5 houses and 22 cars and etc...
And, like most 'a-holics,' we Greed-a-holics are not yet mature enough to put down the bottle/needle/stock options and begin the long, hard road to recovery.
And, because we're no different than any other drug addict, we're willing to take a f@#king shitload of pain if it means maintaining the fantasy of fast wealth w/little to no work...
Though not a nun, I'm at about 4 degrees - for whatever reasons, I'm basically un-afflicted by Greedism. It's like being the only sober guy at the World's Drunkest American contest most of the time...
For years I have put my retirement funds into socially responsible investment funds like Pax World , or Calvert which refuse to invest in military oriented, alcohol or tobacco businesses. Unfortunately I believe in the past they have invested in banks as a non-War oriented business. But they still have fought to open up Corporate governance to the people, to promote divestment from Apartheid South Africa, and are
lately actively supporting Green investments in solar and wind energy.
This is one way to put your money where your mouth is...
Put your money in a local credit union or a local bank that has not participated in the bail out or in sub prime loans and mortgage securitization. My credit card rate with the credit union is 9.5%
Except for my credit cards which I always pay off I am pretty much totally out of
the rapacious banks. I just paid off my mortgage with a home equity loan from my credit union which is where I have always done all my checking and banking for
years.
Out of their greedy grasp!!
For a period I worked for the bankster Jamie Dimon and JPMorgan Chase and for convenience I got a savings account solely to get cash where I work.
I could not believe the fees!
Under $300 balance fees, more than 3 ATM withdrawals, fees, checking account - fees!
Unbelievable when I am depositing MY money with them so they can get interest from it!
It is SACRIFICE that the youth in North Carolina came upon.
It resulted in their arrest and abuse and sometimes death.
Who is ready for that?
Until we are ready for SACRIFICE please don't complain.
The change towards justice and peace that many seek will not be realized.
Nonviolence requires SACRIFICE as does Victory in the struggle.
Pure SACRIFICE in a just cause ensures victory because it is a direct manifestation of Truth.
Truth when activated can not be defeated.
Just be sure that, as Mr.Schechter informs, it must be continuous to be effective.
SACRIFICE is a tough word to say for many and an even more difficult concept
to embrace, yet it is an absolute essential in the long battle for social justice,
human rights, peace or any other struggle of worth for that matter.
Gandhi spoke tirelessly of the necessity of SACRIFICE in his brilliant work entitled
Non-Violent Resistance (Satyagraha)
He lead his movement for India's liberation through SACRIFICE.
We can liberate ourselves as well.
Get Ready!
Amen! On this our hope rests.
35 yrs. ago we knew all about the evil fucking banks. I remember living in Isla Vista going to UCSB . That yr. 1974 a Bank of America was torched there. Not much has changed except the B of A now along with 3 other banks own America and run DC. How do u stop these orgs.? Burning them down just makes them stronger.
Danny Schecther wrote, "You will be surprised because the acts of a few can inspire action by the many. Think of Brian Haw, camped out in front of the Parliament in London every day since the Iraq war started in 2003. He knows we are in a marathon, not a sprint!
You get where I am going?"
Sort of, but while Brian Haw's camp-out, maintained protest demonstration lasted for years, I haven't read of other people joining him in this act. So, well, I'm not entirely sure where Danny Schechter wants to get to with this, since what Brian Haw did was excellent, but it doesn't seem to have inspired others to do the same.
Danny Schechter then wrote, "I am not sure where Fred Douglass banked, back in the days when companies like Lehman Brothers, before its fall, were financing the slave trade, but his mantra that without struggle, nothing changes still survives".
True, but if I understand Fred. Douglass' stand and words correctly, he wasn't only speaking of non-violent, non-physical confrontation, either. From what I gathered, he understood that words of protest don't suffice against the power of the evil, wicked "elites" reigning over our populations and hijacking our governments.
Danny wrote, "The Banksters are terrified of what they call "economic populism."", and I guess this is true, or once was, but am not sure they really fear it any longer in the USA, since they know about their major push for globalisation to profit worldwide and that the USA's population is only around 5% of total human population on Earth; while Asia has around two-thirds of the total population. There are MANY poor people there, but there's a lot of potential, our economic and political hijackers can perceive. They could be "sacrificing" profiting from Americans for the much greater potential of profiting on the global scale. They certainly didn't put all of the push that they did behind globalisation for nothing, or to be good, kind, generous, ..., albeit extremely generous for or to themselves, yes.
Danny, on Obama, wrote, " I prefer to call it economic democracy. Even Barack Obama understood that years ago when he worked as a community organizer. I am not sure if he still does."
I'm not sure he ever did. He could've done that only to try to make a political name for himself, to make himself popular, to later exploit this gain in undemocratic, unjust, greedy, ... ways. After all, if what I read about his early political "career" path is true, then he's always been very backed by financial "elites", first in Chicago, and then on a broadening basis. He progressed, but not in any good ways. He progressed from local, small-time fraud, to being that on the national [and] international scales.
Danny later wrote, "Where are the activists blocking foreclosures or rallying at unemployment offices for extended benefits. Where is the push back against the health insurers? Why are you asleep?".
I'm not so sure they're asleep. Maybe they only know how to fight when it is taking wars (of aggression) to other countries, especially when non-white. They could be saying to themselves, "Well, as long as the rich elites hijacking our government and economy are whites, they must be pretty okay people, so we just have to accept to be their sacrificial lambs".