EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
The ACORN Standard
Take the case of the top three war contractors, Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Northrop Grumman. These companies have engaged in 108 instances of misconduct since 1995 and have paid fines or settlements totaling nearly $3 billion. In 2007 they won some $77 billion in federal contracts. Or consider pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, which in September paid $2.3 billion to settle a slew of criminal and civil cases, including Medicaid fraud. According to the Justice Department, this was "the largest healthcare fraud settlement" in its history. Yet Pfizer made more than $40 billion in profits last year and won $73 million in federal contracts in 2007; it continues to do robust business with the government. Not bad for a "corporate felon."
Unfortunately, neither Pfizer nor the largest US military contractors are targets of significant Congressional action. Instead it's ACORN, a community organization that trains and advocates for poor and working-class Americans. Over the past fifteen years, ACORN has received just $53 million in federal funds, much of it for low-income housing. Despite--or perhaps because of--its efforts to empower some 500,000 member families, ACORN was the subject of a sting video produced by a right-wing activist that featured a fake pimp and prostitute seeking tax advice. The group swiftly fired the handful of employees who were entrapped, but that didn't put an end to the storm. Fox News aired the video repeatedly, and right-wing astroturf operative Rick Berman set up a Rotten ACORN website. The campaign was wildly successful. In mid-September all but seventy-five House Democrats and seven senators voted with their Republican colleagues to bar the group from receiving federal funds.
ACORN, like all organizations receiving federal dollars, should be subject to Congressional scrutiny. But ACORN was clearly singled out for political reasons. Those Democrats who voted for the "defund ACORN" bill should be required to explain their reasoning to their constituents, particularly when so few of them have taken substantive actions to apply the ACORN standard to corporate criminals with real rap sheets.
A small but growing number of lawmakers are fighting to confront out-of-control corporations. Here are three legislative initiatives that stand out:
§ HR 3679. Representative Betty McCollum of Minnesota introduced her own ACORN Act--the Against Corporations Organizing to Rip off the Nation Act--which seeks to deny federal funds to "corporations or companies guilty of certain felony convictions." Pfizer is singled out, but the act could be applied to other corporations too. "Why are companies that break the law as a business strategy allowed to receive taxpayer funds?" asks McCollum. "A government contract is a privilege, not a right. If a company commits a felony against the people of the United States, then that privilege must end." Significantly, Wisconsin Representative David Obey, chair of the powerful House Appropriations Committee, has signed on as a co-sponsor. Obey also voted to defund ACORN.
§ In the Senate, Bernie Sanders put forward an amendment to the current defense authorization bill (HR3326 S. AMDT. 2617) that calls on the defense secretary to conduct a wide-ranging study of the money the government pays to contractors that have been indicted, settled charges or been fined by any federal agency, as well as those that have been convicted of fraud. It also calls for recommendations on how to penalize contractors that are "repeatedly" involved with fraud. "Virtually every major defense contractor in this country has, for a period of many years, been engaged in systemic, illegal and fraudulent behavior while receiving hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer money," says Sanders. While Sanders is just calling for a "study," the spirit of his amendment could be the basis for legislation that targets corporate criminals receiving federal dollars.
§ Several Congressional offices say they are weighing the possibility of introducing legislation that would apply the ACORN standard to companies like Blackwater, whose operatives will stand trial next year on manslaughter charges stemming from killing Iraqi civilians; or KBR, which is being investigated in connection with the electrocution deaths of US soldiers and contractors in Iraq. Representative Jan Schakowsky says she is considering reintroducing a version of her 2007 Stop Outsourcing Security Act, which sought to ban the use of Blackwater and other mercenary companies from performing armed activities on the federal payroll. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a co-sponsor in the Senate, now oversees the work of Blackwater and other armed State Department contractors, increasingly employed in Afghanistan.
Florida Representative Alan Grayson is spearheading calls for fraudulent military contractors to be defunded under the anti-ACORN legislation. He points to Halliburton's misconduct and its "extreme and gross negligence...putting in showers in Iraq that end up electrocuting soldiers, and feeding them poisoned water." The federal funding ACORN has received over the past twenty years, Grayson says, "is roughly equal to what the taxpayer paid to Halliburton each day during the war in Iraq."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

23 Comments so far
Show AllIsn't there some group that publishes an annual assessment of corruption in each country?
Shouldn't the USA be listed at the top?
I thought everybody understood by now that the law is only for the common man and those who represent him.
When the "elite" commit a crime the proper thing to do is pass a law giving retroactive immunity to the lawbreaker. The other option is to "look forward" and not back. Either way it's already been settled that the wealthy and powerful can operate with impunity.
Therefore ACORN's infraction was a horrible act of fraud and they should be defunded and prosecuted. Whereas Lockheed Martin's felonies should be not only rewarded but applauded.
Why's Scahill confused?
Because Scahill, like you, are logical and decent people.
Those at the upper echelons of "Power" are substantially lacking in one or more of the following three characteristics....
a) Logical thinking
b) Decency
c) Bravery (ability to "stand up to" those who are rotten)
If I, as an individual, cheat the government, I go to jail. For example, if I hide $1 million in income tax that I owe, I would, at least, get a year. But the biggest cheats are corporations that, as Harry Truman put it, don't have an ass to kick. Just change the law a little so that the CEO of any corporation becomes criminally liable for any criminal actions of that corporation. Then those corporations that claim to be essential to the conduct of defense or foreign affairs, could continue to get Federal contracts but their CEO's would go to prison and have their bonuses taken away. Just ask Pete Rose or Martha Stewart what prison is like.
Bet they would be a bit more careful.
You are too logical to be taken seriously by those in power!
(I am going to add to that logic, as follows)
IF JUSTICE IS DONE FAIRLY, then.....
The amount of punishment that someone gets is "proportional" to the damage that a person ACTUALLY does.
By this, I don't mean exactly proportional. If someone steals $5 million they don't necessarily get a five times longer prison term than if they stole $1 million. But they DO get a somewhat longer prison term than the person who stole the lesser amount.
With that said, shouldn't those who have done the most ACTUAL damage to America than anyone else, ever, get the longest prison term? If those who have done the most ACTUAL damage to America don't get any prison time, shouldn't everyone now in prison be released?
(If justice is done fairly)
Those who have done the most ACTUAL damage to America than anyone else, ever, are the main men in The Bush Administration.
Haliburton, Blackwater and several other corporations have also done enough damage to warrant life sentences for their main officials.
It is not even a close call.
What's new? The corporate elite have always paid their congressional lackies to pass "legal" loopholes that allow fraud.Laws that punish are meant for the rest of us.
What's new? The corporate elite have always paid their congressional lackies to pass "legal" loopholes that allow fraud.Laws that punish are meant for the rest of us.
Nice sentiment ppeters, but things don't work that way and can't, except maybe in the Mob or in the USSR under Stalin.
No corporate CEO has the capacity to assure that some underling somewhere is not pursuing some self-aggrandizing scheme based on company connections. Policing that would require federal levels of bureaucratic bullshit.
What's needed is a cultural shift that might start by assuring everyone a true safety net instead of the dog-eat-dog society we have today. Everybody needs a fall-back plan, while today if you are coerced or cajoled or bribed to conspire in a corporate crime, who you gonna call on to enable you to Do the Right Thing? The Congress?!
-30-
Obama could always veto the bill that targets ACORN and include a signing statement that Congress should be targeting real corporate criminals who defraud the government yet still receive taxpayer dollars and government contracts. In my dreams.
Yes,
In my dreams too.
But keep in mind that President Obama is not a Liberal, but is a Centrist.
It is like Thom Hartmann said, on his radio show, "President Clinton is the best Republican President that we have ever had."
The same should be said of President Obama.
(President Dennis Kucinich.... in MY dreams)
Liberals (I am not a conservative) continue to downplay and minimize the problems with ACORN. They were a taxpayer funded arm of the Obama campaign, and are being investigated/indicted in multiple states for voter fraud. If that doesn't bother you, it should. A lot of the "housing" they helped people get are those very same mortgages people couldn't afford. The fraud mentality we saw in the videos pervades the organization (starting with the founder who stole millions).
Definitely criminal contracters and criminal bankers should all be in jail. I hope the bills in Congress are a success. But I expect Obama to find a way to rescue his ACORN friends as he has his banker friends.
What you are doing is like someone who equates a burglar stealing a television from a business office, late at night, with someone who robs a bank at gunpoint and steals a million dollars.
Corporations such as Haliburton, Blackwater, and many others have each done much, much, MUCH more damage than ACORN.
The magnitude of damage is substantially different.
Shame on anyone who doesn't get EXTREMELY angry with corporations who do what Haliburton and Blackwater have done.
And shame on anyone who doesn't put in perspective what ACORN did, as compared with the IMMENSELY worse damage of corporations such as Haliburton and Blackwater.
Until most Americans get educated in the truth of political topics, and therefore almost literally "burst blood vessels" due to extreme anger with Haliburton, Blackwater, etc. there will be NO real hope that America can be a decent country.
"They (Acorn) were a taxpayer funded arm of the Obama campaign"
By applying your logic, then we must also agree that Blackwater, headed by Erik Prince, would the be the taxpayer funded, armed wing of the Republican Party.
Trillions of dollars of tax payers money to bail out corrupt, incompetent, greedy and immoral bankers and car execs (mostly white). The government hardly bats an eye. A small scandal involving a few million at most in a partly government funded organization that has done much to alleviate the suffering of the poor (mostly black or brown), our congress goes into hysterics. Is there something wrong with this picture?
You wrote, "The government hardly bats an eye."
Yes, but what about the hundreds of millions of "common" citizens?
They hardly bat an eye, either.
Shame on anyone who doesn't get EXTREMELY angry with corporations who do this.
And shame on anyone who doesn't put in perspective what ACORN did, as compared with the IMMENSELY worse damage of corporations such as Haliburton and Blackwater.
Until most Americans get educated in the truth of political topics, and therefore almost literally "burst blood vessels" due to extreme anger with Haliburton, Blackwater, etc. there will be no real hope that America can be a decent country.
Think of this subject in another way....
Even when a family member becomes a criminal, especially if it is something major, that family member is often "disowned" and at the very least, harshly scolded.
Now, why do we have so many MENTALLY TWISTED Americans who treat corporations, mentioned in this article, such as Pfizer, Northrop Grumman, Haliburton, etc. better than a loved family member who has become a criminal?
This is insane!
It boggles my mind why so many Americans think that it is not a big deal if corporations do billions of dollars of damage.
And conversely, why are Americans so predisposed to harshness against ACORN?
I am becoming more and more convinced that most of my fellow Americans are literally mentally twisted. And I am starting to actually hate most of what America stands for and actually does.
"It boggles my mind why so many Americans think that it is not a big deal if corporations do billions of dollars of damage.
And conversely, why are Americans so predisposed to harshness against ACORN?"
T. Jefferson said "Enlighten the people, generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like spirits at the dawn of day". It's not happening. Instead, the elites teach USans to believe in strongly what they do not understand. So they are easily split into factions fighting over their strongly held beliefs in things they do not understand, divided and conquered. United we stand, divided we fall.
Like the spiritual deities USans are taught to believe in, the corporations are the caretakers of the society, operating in mysterious ways to provide USans a steady stream of petro-luxuries/conveniences. The deities will mysteriously grant us life in an eternal paradise while the corporations grant us paradise in this life. USans must not understand how the corporations do it, for that would reveal the paradise to be more like a slave plantation.
Everyone should seek enlightenment. Understanding why we should target the godzilla corporations instead of ACORN is one of the dots to connect to form the big picture. Awareness of the big picture gets rid of the "tyranny and oppression of body and mind". Petro-opiates cannot do that.
Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Northrop Grumman help kill brown people.
Acorn helps brown people.
So of course they have to be targeted :-)
The corporate inspired attacks on ACORN are this decade's version of one of Grandpa Caligula's favorite anecdotes: the Welfare Queen who spent her check on vodka. The purpose is the same, to screw poor people.
My take on ACORN.
Here are the facts. There is a scandal concerning ACORN offices in Brooklyn, borough of New York City, Baltimore MD, Washington DC, San Bernardino CA too. ACORN stands for Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now. There issues are housing, voter registration and protecting their members clients from predatory lenders. The reform organization is the largest in terms of memberships of its kind. There are chapters in major cities throughout the United States.
What basically happened was a young woman, Hannah Giles and her cohort, James Okeefe presented themselves as a prostitute and he, her pimp. They are self appointed conservative crusaders with funding from major right wingers There was a hidden camera sting operation. Bertha Lewis sewing the filmmaker for fraud, conspiracy and
Some ACORN workers in various offices, were given illegal information from Ms. Giles and Mr.Okeefe on how to set up a brothel. There was discussions on home loans, evading taxes, underage brothel workers trafficked from El Salvador. All this was caught on videotape. The community organization said it will sue the video makers for false, defamatory damages. The ACORN workers who were part of this were immediately fired.
I am definitely not condoning prostitution and pimping. I do not condone what the young man and young woman suggested ACORN do for them. I think there is much more than catching people in illegal, immoral acts. Truth is James OKeefe said "exposing hypocrises and moral lapses of liberals." What of the moral lapse of destroying an agency that helps people keep their homes, protect from predatory lenders
What Mr James Okeefe and Ms. Hannah Giles was a sting. I know the police can perform them. I'm uncertain if private citizens can. If they can't its a good thing Okeefe and Giles hired lawyers. Besides they solicited the ACORN workers. Solicitation is definitely illegal. In Maryland anybody operating a sting who is not a member of law enforcement There is a law in MD video and/or audio recordings must not be shown unless every participant knows of the taping. This prevents hidden cameras. If the Veritas Visuals film does violate Maryland law, it is a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. Based on the wording of the statute, it could even be illegal for YouTube to disseminate the video
I believe in lawyers for the two film makers not because I think what they did is correct. I am for legal representation because it is my belief every US citizen deserves judicial rights. ACORN should receive their legal, judicial rights too.
The ACORN workers who cooperated with Okeefe and Giles were wrong. However ACORN is made up of many different offices throughout the US. To condemn the entire association in my opinion would be like condemning for example, every police officer for the ones who are corrupt and/or racist. This is not to say there isn't police corruption, racism. What I'm saying it isn't fair or right to to entirely denounce the entire police force. Likewise it's unfair to be denouncing the whole ACORN agency.
Republicans's been condemning ACORN for years. In 2008 there was the voter fraud controversy. In a political cartoon in the post, ACORN members were depicted with donkey heads. The donkey is the symbol for Democrats. Or perhaps they were showing them to be asses. Or maybe they were illustrating they were both for that matter.
Being that the US Congress voted not to fund ACORN, my gut feeling is this incident with Giles and Okeefe was a way to completely obliberate ACORN.
At the very minimum, ACORN must make absolutely certain they hire responsible employees. Perhaps their main fault is not hiring men and women who act responsibly.
ACORN IS non partisan. They helped poor people to register to vote. ACORN's members being mostly low income and of various minorities tend to vote Democratic.
Rachel Maddow of MSNBC is reporting the lies said and written of ACORN by rightwingers and the truth. It is a refreshing perspective from the FOX news point of vew on this matter. I urge checking it out for a real fair and balanced and accurate look.
Karl Rove, Bush's strategist is behind the ACORN attacks. James Okeefe and Hannah Giles, a columnist for ultraconservative TownHall were funded by wealthy conservatives. Chief Peter Thiel who funded startup money for Facebook. They were not unfunded independent video makers. Okeefe is a member of the Leadership Inst, a neocon think tank.
www.factcheck.org the vast ACORN democratic vote fraud conspiracy was more a case of lazy workers than real vote fraud.
and children, people with disabilties.
I distinctly recall thenGoverner Rudy GulianoNYR at the 2008 Republican convention, smirked when he mentioned Barack Obama was a community organizer. The message to me, and most likely quite a few others , is helping low income people organize for their rights, needs is to be looked down upon Its to be discredited from real work. As I figured he was tacitly referring to Obama who previously worked as a lawyer for ACORN.
Former U.S. attorney David Iglesias who one of the US attorneys in the firings initiated by then pres. George W. Bush and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales even though he received many positive review. He claimed his firing was because he refused to obey Republican pressure to pursue phony voter registration cases that supposedly involved ACORN. He never found any evidence of any wrong doing regarding voter fraud by ACORN.
Thanks for the synopsis.
Thanks to Jeremy Scahill for making a simple point that seems to have gotten lost in the static about the ACORN "stings."
Betty McCollum, David Obey, Bernie Sanders, Jan Schakowsky, and Alan Grayson deserve great credit for taking this opportunity to clean house. They have the perfect rejoinder to conservatives who will howl in protest: if it was proper to cut ACORN's funding, why isn't it proper to cut funding for other organizations that have abused the public's trust much more seriously than ACORN?
And by the way, why haven't we heard from teams of private investigators with video cameras working on the federal grantees in question? Come to think of it, from the statements in the article, it looks like plenty of incriminating evidence has already been gathered.