Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
One Nation, Under Illusion
The hoariest and most oft-repeated cliche in American politics may be that America is the greatest country in the world. Every politician, Democrat and Republican, seems duty bound to pander to this idea of American exceptionalism, and woe unto him who hints otherwise. This country is "the last, best hope of mankind,'' or the "shining city on the hill,'' or the "great social experiment.'' As if this weren't enough, Jimmy Carter upped the fawning ante 30 years ago by uttering arguably the most damning words in modern American politics. He called for a "government as good as the American people,'' thus taking national greatness and investing it in each and every one of us.
Carter was speaking when Watergate was fresh, and government had been disgraced, but still. The fact of the matter is that whenever anything really significant has been accomplished by our government, it is precisely because it was better than the American people.
Think of World War II, America's entrance into which was strenuously resisted by the populace until Franklin Roosevelt carefully laid the groundwork and Pearl Harbor made it inevitable. Think of civil rights, which Lyndon Johnson pressed despite widescale opposition, and not just in the South. Even then it took more than 100 years. Or think of the current health care debate in which Americans seem to desire some sort of reform, just not a reform that would significantly help people in dire need, while the Obama administration is pushing to provide that assistance. In the end, government has inspired Americans far more than Americans have inspired their government. They are too busy boasting.
There is nothing wrong with self-satisfaction or national pride. But the incessant trumpeting of our national superiority to every other country in the world is more than just off-putting and insulting. It is infantile, like the vaunting of a schoolyard bully that his Dad is better than your Dad. It is wrong. And it might be dangerous both to ourselves and to the rest of the world.
Consider what it means. By what standard is one nation any greater than any other nation? Yes, the United States has vast material resources - we rank eighth in gross domestic product per capita - but we also have, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the "highest inequality and poverty rate'' in the world, outside of Mexico and Turkey, and things are getting worse. Nothing to boast of there.
Yes, we have a relatively high median income, but our standard of living as measured by the Human Development Index of the United Nations ranks us only 15th in the world, behind, among others, Norway, France, Canada, and Australia. Are they better than we are? Even our home ownership rate trails that of the citizens of Canada, Belgium, Spain, Norway, and even Portugal.
Yes, the United States has the best system of higher education in the world, but, according to an Educational Policy Institute report, we rank 13th in the affordability of that education, and we are much less successful with lower education - 11th in the percentage of the 25 to 34 population with a high school diploma and 22d in science education.
And though Americans love to crow about the "best health care'' in the world, the fact is that according to the World Health Organization Index, we actually rank 37th in the quality of our health care. And we are still the only industrialized country in the world without a national health care system.
Even when one considers anecdotal evidence - "If this isn't the greatest country then why do so many people want to come here?'' - the case isn't particularly persuasive. Mexicans cross the border to the United States for economic opportunity. Turks go to Germany, Indians and Pakistanis to Great Britain, Arabs to France. This isn't a sign of our special greatness, just a sign that desperate people seek a more powerful economy for their betterment.
The point of all this isn't that America doesn't have a lot to be proud of. It does. The point is that just about every country has a lot to be proud of, and America has no more right to assume it is the greatest nation in the world than does France, Switzerland, China, or Russia.
None of this would make much difference if the self-congratulation was just harmless bragging. But there are consequences. A country that believes it is the greatest in the world is also less likely to be constrained by that world. One could argue that the Iraq war was a direct result of a sense of national infallibility. So was our willingness to torture, our reluctance to admit our mistakes in Afghanistan, our culpability in the global recession, and our foot-dragging on global warming. Such a nation is also less likely to introspect or to strive for true greatness because it believes its greatness has already arrived.
There is something bizarre about a country whose leaders have constantly to toady to their constituents and in which any criticism is tantamount to a lack of patriotism, but that describes America today. Every politician feels compelled to ape Jimmy Carter's old words to the point where our alleged greatness has also become our national mantra.
It seems eons ago when Bobby Kennedy, a politician who didn't like to stroke even his own supporters, actually scolded a rally for booing Lyndon Johnson because, Kennedy said, Johnson couldn't have done what he did in Vietnam if he didn't have the American people, including Kennedy's audience, as his facilitators.
We aren't going to hear that sort of honesty from political leaders any more because the American people are too thin-skinned and arrogant to tolerate it. Arrogance in an individual is unbecoming. It is no more becoming for a nation. The Greeks understood that the gods punished mortals for their hubris - for feeling that they were godlike. They knew that overweening pride preceded a fall. One suspects that nations are no more immune to punishment than individuals. A nation that brooks no criticism, a nation that feels it is always better than any other, a nation that has to be endlessly flattered and won't face the truth, a nation whose people think they possess some special moral exemption and wisdom, a nation without humility is a nation spoiling for calamity.
We've been living in a fool's paradise. The result may be a government that is as good as the American people, which is something that should concern everyone.

173 Comments so far
Show AllWell, in one way at least, we are the greatest. We're definitely the greatest bully in the world!
Jim Shea
When the dollar becomes a second class currency and the US can no longer borrow cheap money, the US will find itself just another third world nation.
A nation with 10,000 nukes and leadership that's batcrap crazy.
Take the opportunity to go to different parts of the world and see what a real bully is.
Given that the USA has its Military in over 100 countries and uses it against other countries with impunity, one would have to visit a lot of countries to find a better example of a bully.
How many Countires has Burma invaded?
How many countries does Russia have its Military in?
How many coups of Governments of other nations have been sponsored by North Korea?
How many times have Somali Pilots bombed Libya, killing one hundred plus Civilains and been given a medal for doing so?
The bully description is apt.
Sioux Rose
GW: We were "resonating" to the same theme. I had not yet read your post, while relating the issue of U.S. bases around the world in mine.
Well, the difference with most other global bullies is, that they don't try to white-wash their actions, like the US are doing all the time. "Beacon of Freedom", "Land of the Free" and "Home of the Brave" become empty slogans when considering the unprovoked wars, the close relationships with far-right regimes, and the general "In your face" attitude of the US. Some enemies can be easier to stomach than this "friend", who's willing to invade my country the moment an American citizen has to face trial at the ICC in The Hague; we should have sent you ambassador home!!
Sioux Rose
HAR DAVIDS: Adding to your post, and aimed at Henry 8, is the overt fact of 700 plus military bases set 'round the world. Know of any other nation that dares to leave its martial imprint in so many other lands? Or how about the daily discussions on Afghanistan arguably by the nation's leaders? NEVER do they consider the actual RESIDENTS of the lands being occupied, that is, what they need or want. So-called debate focuses on which military maneuvers (i.e. forms of aggression) will "win" the trophy. Yet the public is led to believe these wars are based on delivering a foreign people to our better way of life, while the numbers of the official dead are hidden, along with their broken, bloodied bodies.
American exceptionalism is the scourge of the world. For every dollar spent on militarism and ACTS of war, pennies are spent on alleged aid. And too often, said aid consists mostly of setting up some resource-hungry corporation on an impoverished nation's turf so it can rip off the population.
This article seems to suggest that the government is what's good about the nation, but the flaw lies with the people for their lack of understanding. It is the government that has altered the rules of broadcasting to ensure that only a few corporations, those with war in mind, get to monopolize the very airwaves that could otherwise make for a better educated citizenry. It's a sinister catch-22. Make the people stupid and ill-informed, then blame them for their lack of universal vision.
Follow the roots of corruption and you end up with two key players: Mammon/"the love of $ = the root of all evil, and "Mars rules," the MIC and its tentacles as bravely warned against by Eisenhower some 49 years ago.
Have YOU lived outside of the USA? By that I mean, have you ever taken up residence somewhere else (not simply a visit to some tourist all-inclusive enclave)?
I doubt it.
Until you do attain that type of experience, then you have no reference points.
"I'm not a politician...I only suffer the consequences"
Peter Tosh
I have, for 10 of my near 70 years ----- and I saw the evils of US domination on two sides of the globe for the entire 1970's.
A second thought though, while it was helpful in gaining some understanding, it was not the only way---- READ CHALMERS JOHNSON!!!
And thus, we are also the greatest purveyor of death and destruction in the world.
"Or think of the current health care debate in which Americans seem to desire some sort of reform, just not a reform that would significantly help people in dire need, while the Obama administration is pushing to provide that assistance. In the end, government has inspired Americans far more than Americans have inspired their government. They are too busy boasting."
Well, he's wrong on this one. On the health care front Americans want major reform and neither Obama, nor the Repubs, nor many Dems, are listening to them. Obama is a totally dishonest broker on health care. And on the two unnecessary wars? With all the reports coming out, that speaks for itself, too. I wish I could say that I was inspired by my government, but I'm not.
True progressives understand very well the faults of America and don't fall back on the inflated ego of many Americans. Right now "American exceptionalism" is killing this country and it's people.
"Reform " in America is defined as enhanced corporate welfare.
Gabler sez: "Or think of the current health care debate in which Americans seem to desire some sort of reform, just not a reform that would significantly help people in dire need, while the Obama administration is pushing to provide that assistance."
***
Pretty good commentary overall, but this line stopped me, as well.
Is he talking about "Single payer is off the table" Obama, who spent the lead-up to this "debate" cutting backroom deals with pharma and insurance execs?
there was an article where the writer had interviewed and polled americans:
and what she found out was : an underlying, common notion among americans can be summed up like this =- regarding Health care, social services, etc:
"Americans LIKE these things for themselves -- but DON'T WANT it for others".
THAT sums up the "american spirit".
"There is nothing wrong with self-satisfaction or national pride,"
I very much disagree.
Self-satisfaction and national pride are constant sources of self-deceit and we need to be always wary of these traps.
Both of these can stem from a sense of gratitude, which is usually good, but, all too often, human nature then begins misinterpreting its own history and magnifying its own importance - until it destroys itself.
Even gratitude can be dangerous if it is not accurately applied.
An excellent analysis Mr. Gabler.
If anyone ever has the oppurtunity in their lifetime, set up residence in another country for a year or three. It will give you a clear perspective on what's going on in the United States. When you can see the embarrasing arrogance and hubris in fellow Americans living in other parts of the world you then realize the delusions we have set up for ourselves here. You'll also see what a nation of spineless cowards we have become, because we don't want to step outside of our comfort zones, having embraced contentment with the statusque.
"Everyone" has an opinon.
Wow, henry.
Thanks for proving exactly the point of this article.
You're right Henry8, everyone has an opinion, we all make observations too, particularly from life experience once one has lived long enough to know the difference.
I had a long post refuting all the canards in this pitiful article attempting the same old line of America bashing. I should have just said....and I erased the first to say....this article is manure of the lowest order.
Since when is a bit of honest, self-examination and reflection "America bashing"? This comment smacks of the very thing the article attempts to portray.
Someone else on CD posted about authoritarian personality types a week or two ago. I did some research and what I found helped me a lot in seeing how some others view the world. For all the gory details Google Authoritarian Personality. There is plenty of good info on the first page. I've included some of the traits of that personality type below.
Save your breath. You are not going to reason with people like that, their view of the world is more emotional as apposed to rational.
Authoritarians exhibit:
Faulty Reasoning (lack of critical thinking).
1. make incorrect inferences from evidence,
2. hold contradictory ideas via compartmentalized thinking,
3. accept that many problems are "our most serious problem,"
4. accept insufficient evidence that supports their beliefs,
5. trust people who tell them what they want to hear, and
6. use double standards in their judgments.
Authoritarians exhibit hostility Toward Other Groups, Rigid Character Attributes, and BLINDNESS TO FAILINGS OF SELF, AUTHORITARIAN LEADERS, AND COUNTRY.
So know who you are dealing with and move on, like Barney Frank did when he referred to that lady at the town hall meeting as the same as trying to argue with a dining room table.
People on the left look at the U.S. as a adult child looks at a flawed father. A father you want to help to become a better person, like maybe help him stop drinking, or loose weight for example. On the right they look at the country like a small child looks at his farther. All powerful, all knowing and never wrong.
Tom
The long post would have been full of the excrement you describe. Any and all refutation would have been a lie since the quoted facts are not refutable!!!
There was no bashing of America - just a bashing of mean-spirited folks like yourself who are blind to ongoing events.
One fact that he is apparently not aware of is that universities in the EU are free to those qualified. In fact, there is free space for qualified non-EU students on a space available basis as well. I have several friends whose children got tuition free undergrad degrees at the Sorbonne and Masters from Cambridge - FREE.
But I could be wrong ! But I'm not in this case
But
Good for you Curmudgeon ---- You beat me to the punch---
Henry8 ---- as usual, you are full of it (with the sh left out)
each and every individual is a solitary spiritual entity existing within a body manufactured from the very planet beneath us...if that planet contains toxins, then so does the resulting body...and this process continues throughout one's life as molecules are constantly exchanged between the planet and the body...
we have parents, whether both are present beyond conception, or not, and an immediate environment to provide our physical needs...everything else is conceptually and logistically handed us by either our predecessors, or our more determined contemporaries, invariably with an agenda...
nationality is a consequence of birth, and a fraudulent one...
the idea is to preserve the sanctity of the healthy, living world and share it with all to the best of our ability...
beyond that, one must do one's own thinking about life and purpose, not blindly accept the spoutings of others...ultimately, the conflict between those who would control and those who would remain independent, even alive, becomes violent...we are reaching that point now, as people are forced out of homes, and personal physical sustenance, conditioning and defense are viewed as archaic, having long ago been relegated to professionals...
the only answer is to take back control of, and responsibility for, one's own existence, stop offering allegiance to those who would but abuse such, and return to a supporting network of immediate family and neighbors...this means personally growing and harvesting plants and animals in your vicinity, and personally assisting when defense is required...
we don't have much time to make the switch, as the environment is quickly deteriorating, due to human industrial and chemical alteration...
Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...all the world's citizens unanimously adopting an agrarian, acoustic life...local governance and defense...local food and shelter and water...let's get those gardens growing!
If not this solution, then what? Please? I'm serious...
I agree with much of what you wrote, except that I think the bastards won't let us do it. No way, no how, no chance. If we retreat into our own self-sustaining communities, the bastards will play their games and produce legal paper indicating that our land is theirs and we better get off of it or their army, whether private or public or a mixture of both, will blast us off. I would place the odds on that as 100 to 1 or better. I think that happened before on this continent to some other people in their self-sustaining communities, did it not?
yes, I agree historical precedent is not inspiring...on the other hand, alot of the slaughter that took place here was successful due to treachery on the part of the invading force...a show of honest compromise followed by a knife in the back...perhaps we could learn lessons from that? In spite of such treachery, the native tribes were, at one point, well on their way to uniting in defense, but, sadly, still hampered by continual betrayal by both British and French authorities in government and military...
I don't hold this up as a perfect solution, I hold it up as the best hope for this planet's health, which, to me, is paramount...I honestly don't know what else to suggest...if we do not follow my suggested course, I look forward and see nothing but horror...
of course, it could absolutely be horror either way, but at least my way would be proactive, and hopeful, even if not very, rather than reactive and resigned...
Dubet, I don't always agree with you, but you always make me think. Thank you for that---- As the current steward of a pristine small property at the top of a watershed, I have been heading in this direction for some years, and intend to continue this direction. This time, I happen to agree with you.
Sioux Rose
KIVALS: How about "emininent Domain," and/or "It's a matter of national security," added to the charade about who's a domestic enemy (or not)... as seen in things like Ruby Ridge, Waco, etc. Sort of brings to mind the spiritual adage to "be in the world, but not OF it." Easier said, than done.
"It's a matter of national security,"
in truth, it's more a matter of notional security.
There are four fascists now on the Supreme Court, so if just one more joins the court, anything goes (thank goodness Sotomayor appears not to be that fifth fascist). A fascist legislature could pass any fascist law and the Supreme Court would validate it, regardless of how it contradicts the words in the constitution. All the pabulum from the right about "original intent" is just part of a strategy aimed at confusing the public and should never be taken seriously.
That sounds wonderful, but just to play devils advocate for a second...
What happens when we out grow our local communities and their is competition between neighbors for resources. Localities that share commonalities (whether it be geographical, religious, political, trade, whatever) will unite to form bigger safer States to defend inevitable attacks from poorer over crowded localities.
Prior to the U.S. Constitution we were individual States with a loose alliance under the Articles of Confederation (much like Nations under the U.N. today). We united under the constitution for security reasons.
I would suggest this... a world with strong local governments and economies, but an international bill of rights, and a loose alliance between ALL localities to adhere to that bill of rights. Which is essentially a federalized constitutional republic. Which is basically what we have now. People just need to take more interest in local affairs.
I appreciate your response...
unfortunately, what we have now is completely dependent upon the destruction of the living world, which cannot be allowed...
if 'interest in local affairs' equates to cessation of all industrial and chemical alteration of local natural resources, perhaps based on watershed, and the termination of money-based allocation of land and shelter and reliance upon electricity, then we may be in agreement...
if not, then all arguments related to human affairs will become moot before too much longer, as this planet will simply cease to support us, due to our industrial and chemical breaking of vitally integrated processes...
the living human population is a subset of the living world...without the living world, there will be no governments, no economies, no bills, no rights, no alliances, no nothing...
the choice to abandon our industrial life will be made, one way or another...
To say that the US is the greatest nation on earth misses a more important point: Americans were born on third base and act like they hit a home run.
It is no great thing to amass great wealth when you do so by wars of conquest, slave labor, selective persecution of designated demographics of the population, and by stirring up ethnic, racial, religious, and gender strife as a means of keeping everyone quarreling among themselves.
The US is no different than the empires of old from Egypt to Britain--except that it indulges the self-deluding hypocrisy that "God" has blessed it do as they did and not suffer the same consequences as they did.
Poet
Well said, Poet!
Also. Not to bring up an oft. repeated mantra. But.....Obama has alsways claimed his belief in 'american exceptionalism'. That was enough for me to know. Right from the start.
Also. This delusional thinking is no different, in fact, than the kind of thinking that moved missionaries for centuries, to foist their religion upon the world, in the infantile belief that they alone held the only Truth and the only Way.
And, the belief that Obama would 'save' us from ourselves, as has been posted in other commentary, is part of the delusional thinking. Much like going to Church (voting booth)and believing you've 'got it covered'. It is profoundly naive to have believed in change we can believe in.
I never knew what that meant. Where's the 'there', there'?
And of course. The belief in a 'saviour' rescuing us after we've allowed the atrocities to be done in our names and to ourselves...... It is very 2,000 years ago.
All just my own opinion.
Re Poet October 13th, 2009 11:09 am
Another source of exceptionalism, in this case white Northern European, is exhaustively treated in Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs and Steel." It goes farther back than 1776, or even 1620.
Henry8, and others who take exception to "America-bashing," would do well to look into it.
Thank you for the tip!
Hey, I'm reading that very book as we speak! I have about 90 pages left.
Fascinating read, and it's interesting to hear a physiology professor's take on history and evolution. It won the Pulitzer Prize back in 1997.
E Pluribus Delirium
nice
:O)
Long live Pangea!
Actually, this article is a bit behind the curve. It is the people that want out of Iraq-Afghanistan, that would prefer single payer, that oppose Wall street bailouts, that support environmental issues...In fact the majority supports Gay Rights--it is the corporate media and corporate government who give a false impression of what the people want and for that reason this article is insulting and offensive.
oh, and Walt disney was a jackass who stole the work of German animators.
1st ill-usion God ...
Here Here!
We eventually teach our children that a kind, old bearded man doesn't actually bring us presents if we are good...even when we write him letters.
The closeness of this myth to the myth of a kind, old bearded man who listens to us and rewards us with presents is astonishing.
Yet one myth we managed to lose by the time we are teenagers, while the other one supports a vast world-wide infrastructure, takes large sums from people who cannot afford it, and receives billions in tax-support and tax breaks.
Bill Mahr is right, if we don't grow up and take some responsibility for what we do we may well encounter our own self-fulfilling prophecy of wholescale planetary disaster.
Neal Gabler says our problem is because we are "too thin skinned and arrogant." NO! We are IGNORANT. This is to be expected when our citizens watch hours and hours of TV everyday. The more time the children spend watching TV the harder it is for them to learn to read. The more a person watches FOX news the less they know. Our educational system has been destroyed by inadequate funding and horrible text books---especially on the subject of American history. We are fed lies and are so gullible that we belive them and even defend them. PROUD TO BE AMERICAN is on lots of car bumpers---I ask, proud of what?