Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Gelbart and Schulberg: Two Writers Depart an Ever Stranger Land
You certainly can argue that the depths to which our so-called democratic dialogue has sunk are nothing new. Politicians and advocates have been slinging mud since the earth was cool enough to hurl.
The undeniable difference today is the speed and variety of the compost being thrown. With the 24-hour instantaneous delivery systems offered by radio, TV and the Internet, people are feeling more and more compelled to say ludicrous, shameful things in public that just a short time ago they would have hesitated to say in private.
Rational pleas for ceasefires go unheeded. But this week, conservative Rick Moran, the freelance writer (and brother of ABC News' Nightline co-host Terry Moran) who runs the archly named website Right Wing Nuthouse, went out on a limb and urged sanity.
He wrote, "Employing reason and rationality to fight Obama and the liberals is far superior to the utter stupidity found in the baseless, exaggerated, hyperbolic and ignorant critiques of the left and Obama that is [sic] passed off as 'conservative' thought by those who haven't a clue what conservatism means...
"Exaggeration is not argument. It is emotionalism run rampant. And at its base is simple, unreasoning fear. Fear of change, fear that the powerlessness conservatives feel right now is a permanent feature of American politics, and, I am sorry to say, fear of Obama because he is a black man."
Stir into this perverse brew some of the illogical bloviation being bruited about in the chambers of the United States Congress and you have the perfect recipe for the death of rational political discourse in America.
Listen to Republican Senator John Ensign of Nevada during the markup of the health care reform bill in the Senate Finance Committee this week, arguing that in comparison to other systems around the world, "If you take out accidental deaths due to car accidents, and you take out gun deaths because we like our guns in the United States and there are a lot more gun deaths in the United States -- you take out those two things, you adjust those, and we are actually better in terms of survival rates." Huh?
Or Democratic Senator Max Baucus of Montana arguing that while he's in favor of a public option, he can't vote for it because it won't get the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster -- in part because he won't vote for it. For corkscrew sophistry, that ranks right up there with the story of the American officer in Vietnam who said we had to destroy the village to save it.
All of which brought to mind the summer's passing of two writer friends and colleagues, each of whom had a sure grasp of mass hysteria and a prescient eye for the demagoguery and bureaucratic bunco that are running more rampant than ever.
Budd Schulberg died in August at the age of 95. We first met -- briefly -- in 1975 at a public television auction where he was presenting a pair of boxing gloves autographed by Muhammad Ali. Years later we would serve together on the council of the Writers Guild of America, East.
The fight game was one of Budd's great passions -- his novel, The Harder They Fall, perfectly captured the underside of the boxing world, its story loosely based on that of world heavyweight champion Primo Carnero, a fighter brought down by crooked managers.
Budd made three other great contributions to American literature. First, the classic Hollywood novel What Makes Sammy Run?, an account of the movie business so graphically accurate and acerbic (his father had been the head of Paramount), the studios offered to ride him out of town on a rail -- the third rail, preferably. Its antihero, the appallingly ambitious and grasping Sammy Glick, became a synonym for the crassness of show business and more.
"It was America," Schulberg wrote. "All the glory and opportunity, the push and the speed, the grind of gears and the crap."
Budd relished the story that Tom Cruise wanted to make a movie version of the book -- if they could just make Sammy a little nicer.
To that literary success, add the Academy Award-winning screenplay for On the Waterfront and Schulberg's script for the movie A Face in the Crowd, a stunningly prophetic look at media, the cult of personality and their impact on American society and politics.
Its main character, a talk show host named Lonesome Rhodes, is a ratings smash whose folksy charm hides a ruthless, country-fried fascist with political aspirations -- Sammy Glick with hayseed in his hair.
Sounding remarkably like the Limbaughs and Becks of today, he proclaims, "I'm not just an entertainer. I'm an influence, a wielder of opinion, a force... a force!"
But Schulberg himself was not without hubris. Sadly, he also will be remembered for his role as a friendly witness before the House Un-American Activities Committee during the era of the Hollywood blacklist. For a time, he had been a member of the Communist Party, and when questioned identified several other writers as members.
As journalist Victor Navasky wrote in an afterword to his book, Naming Names, a comprehensive and perceptive chronicle of those times, "The fear conspired to divide and sometimes destroy decent people of good will who for years had been colleagues and compatriots. The wounds won't heal. The issues are passed on from generation to generation."
Publicly, Budd claimed not to regret what he had done. But for what it's worth, in the decades following that awful period, I think there was an attempt at redemption. Budd endeavored to be a staunch member of our union and to share his creative gifts with others, especially through his work with minority artists at the Frederick Douglass Creative Arts Center in Harlem and the Douglass House Watts Writers Workshop in Los Angeles. Was that enough? It's not for me to decide.
The other death was that of Larry Gelbart, the great comedic writer of movies, TV, and theater who died in September. He was 81, and in his will, he reportedly asked that his tombstone read, "At last, a plot."
We first met in 1987, when I interviewed him for a book and a PBS series on the history of television. "The only way you can get any feeling out of a television set is to touch it when you're wet," he claimed, and yet in the long-running TV version of the movie M*A*S*H, co-produced with Gene Reynolds, Larry managed to combine pathos and slapstick humor, telling dark jokes against the backdrop of the Korean War -- the show's thinly disguised metaphor for Vietnam.
Gelbart, too, was a union stalwart, combative right to the end, when he was outspoken about recent elections at the Writers Guild of America, West. During the 100-day writers strike that began in 2007, although he couldn't walk the picket line, he took an active role, helping with strategy and manning phones.
It was Larry who advised me that for a writer to pin his or her hopes for career satisfaction on movies or television alone was a sure way to a broken heart -- that it was important to find your voice in other kinds of writing as well -- books, articles, pieces like this.
For Gelbart it was the stage, with such shows as A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum, City of Angels, and a brilliant piece of satire and wordplay called Mastergate.
Written in the wake of the late '80s Iran-contra hearings, Larry's take on the inanities of legislative posturing seem as likely as much of the nonsense being spouted at this week's Senate Finance Committee sessions.
Here's his fictitious chairman, Senator Bowman, announcing that, "This panel, which intends to give every appearance of being bipartisan, will be ever-mindful of the President's instructions to dig down as far as we can, no matter how high up that might take us. Let me emphaticize one thing at the outset. This is not a witch hunt. It is not a trial. We are not looking for hides to skin nor goats to scape. We're just trying to get all the facts together in one room at the same time in the hope that they'll somehow recognize one another. Our chief goal, of course, is to answer the question: 'What did the President know. And does he have any idea that he knew it?'"
In the Heavenly Kingdom or the Elysian Fields or wherever it is gifted writers go to die, Larry Gelbart and Budd Schulberg must be watching the current scene, shaking their heads in both recognition and wonder.


16 Comments so far
Show AllWinship writes ...
"If you take out accidental deaths due to car accidents, and you take out gun deaths because we like our guns in the United States and there are a lot more gun deaths in the United States -- you take out those two things, you adjust those, and we are actually better in terms of survival rates." Huh?
Huh? What part doesn't this idiot understand? If this is true, it it certainly relevant to the computation of survival statistics and using them to judge the medical system.
Also I just heard on the radio that the birth survival numbers are completely skewed against the US because here we try to save everyone, and in other countries many non-viable babies aren't counted in the statistics. Again, if true, it is certainly relevant to the evaluation of the medical system.
"Listen to Republican Senator John Ensign of Nevada..."
____________________________________________
You do realize Winship was quoting that depraved ass Ensign's idiocy, don't you?
Poor Ensign has a lot on his little mind these days, what with negotiating with his ex-mistress for the right price to finally shut her and her family up, and maintain Ensign's unimpeachable reputation for sterling character, dontcha know.
I understand Ensign is trying to have the affair annulled.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Thanks to Michael Winship for a lovely tribute.
Sioux Rose
STAN: I "second" your motion. Interesting details also presented on the achievements of these writers who have recently passed on.
"Exaggeration is not argument. It is emotionalism run rampant. And at its base is simple, unreasoning fear. Fear of change, fear that the powerlessness conservatives feel right now is a permanent feature of American politics, and, I am sorry to say, fear of Obama because he is a black man."
Same old charges of racism. Got to play that race card no matter what. Its beggining to be a losing play you idiot. People are opposing Obama for what he is doing, for his policies.
Most people... perhaps "...are opposing Obama for what he is doing, for his policies."
But, please, Henry8, don't be naive, go South ... deep South or not-so-deep, and actually just about any state in this nation, and you will find the hard-core bigots who feel, with savage intensity, that a "nigger" should no way, nohow be president of the United States.
Generations of conditioning and the way it was does not change fast, especially among people whose minds are set and rigid and who are not known for brains, hearts and spirits which coalesce and learn to fly out of the boxes and soar with awakened sensibilities that embrace All THAT IS with compassion, gratitude, love, a sense of justice, and a yearning for the national/global harmony that is really the way it works, the only way it can work, if all the parts of individual HUMAN BEINGS were truly connected.
Never in my long life have I seen or experienced [personal meetings or what is said or written] so many people in this nation so disconnected from themselves. That is because they have been plugged in to a little box from whence cometh instructions on what to buy and where to buy it, what will make them happy, what to eat, what their inevitable sicknesses of all kinds require to be cured, what pills to take to avoid feeling sad ever again, how to be sexy and how to have sex and how to enhance sex, how to succeed and the definition of success and how to appear successful, how to exercise, how to get to heaven by donating to the cause of Jesus or whomever, how to be soulful and spiritual and become enlightened with 10 Easy Slogans and special prayer beads, ... HOW TO THINK ABOUT WHATEVER ... which is really not independent thinking at all.
The word is CONDITIONING and it is why the vast majority of people don't have a clue about what's happening or why, and many, many, many continue to remain apathetic until our current REALITY hits them squarely between the eyes and where they live.
Surprise! ... The beginning of WAKE UP TIME.
But, please, Henry8, THERE ARE conditioned racists among us who are boiling and seething because the president leading our country is a result of [for some, the judgment is SINFUL] miscegenation and that makes him BLACK and a ... I won't repeat the word.
A little deeper, please.
peace, cm
Sioux Rose
CEE MIRACLES: Great post! I'd like to add that all this conditioning is not done for naught! It fulfills a number of key purposes, the first may well be to market all of those TAUGHT and conditioned desires, what Dr. Seuss playfully referred to as "thneeds." That ensures a steady stream of profits which the lords of Mammon love all too well. Secondly, a population conditioned from the cradle to the grave to find its permissions granted by the "experts" who speak from said box becomes a populace easy to control. Authoritarians, who come in under various titles to suit each epoch (czar, dictator, pharaoh, king, tyrant, etc.), prefer such a population. Pretty soon no armed forces will be needed, the full process of programming will have become readily internalized. Given the types of weapons now being used or worked on, controlling citizens' perceptions can't be far off! Sci-fi is rendered ordinary fare when the military grants an embarassment of riches to its covert branches of weapons' development.
In the fine film, "My Dinner with Andre," Andre mentions a 80-plus year old botanist who visits New York City and remarks that it resembles "the new model prison camp of the future." He asks rhetorically, "Have you ever noticed how many people speak about getting out... but never do?" And then he concludes, "The inmates have become their own guards," or something to that effect.
There is no conditioning more effective than that which simulates the voice of one's own conscience, style, and predilections. The enemy has been digested in full. You are what you eat, style. I turned off my TV 3 years ago and do NOT miss it, and when I am somewhere only to find its "Big Brother" bullshit bloviating, a visceral response of disgust comes over me. One doesn't realize the degree of its subliminal powers and seductive undertones until one detoxes from it, kinda' like unplugging from The Matrix! (Just wish I could move like Neo or Trinity!)
Great addition, Sioux Rose. I think between the two of us we've covered a considerable span of the waterfront. ; - )
Always meant to see "My Dinner with Andre," but somehow ... Will track it down, hopefully, at one of our two local libraries. The video store here in town closed.
Haven't had a working TV for about three years now either, and when I do watch it occasionally at a friend's house, I also have a visceral response of yecch, except for Turner Classic Movies. Just caught "Mrs. Soffler," 1984 film with Diane Keaton and Mel Gibson, a true story from 1901, and loosely, involving the prison system. Mrs. Soffler is the wife of the warden and passes out bibles and gentle religion to those on death row especially.
I never heard of the film, but in 1984 I had quit my executive director position and was doing a global peace plan unexpectedly, of all things, and perhaps that's why. Recommend "Mrs. Soffler" highly for the superb acting alone. I believe the film and actors won some awards.
Similar theme to what has been discussed in these comments -- waking up from sleep and the demand that that creates to change so many of the things we have become so sure of and then step out there, despite our fears, transforming, and becoming more of who we really are, who we are meant to be.
The Paradigm Shift. It's coming, and nobody said it would be easy.
peace, cm
Thank you for mentioning the excellent Keaton-Gibson film whose title is "Mrs. Soffel."
q
Sioux Rose
Hello, Cee Miracles: I always appreciate your congeniality, and will check out that film. I have built up a collection so that if I need to be "entertained," I can choose from a little library of film classics. And these time-outs also help with being part of the collective "birthing" required by said paradigm shift.
Racism is ingrained in the American public. It goes to the very core of our being. Those who don't recognize this, and don't try to do something IN THEMSELVES, will be part of the vast herd that dance to the tune of the oligarchic propaganda machine.
I though I was free of prejudice. I even had a black lover. But during a very nasty fight I called him a 'darky'. I've never again made the mistake of thinking that I was free of prejudice.
Did it escape your notice that the person saying that is an opponent of Obama?
Winship really must have written that piece in a hurry!
His '[sic]' is inappropriate, since the 'is' refers to 'the utter stupidity' and is therefore correct in number.
It's Primo Carnera not Carnero.
And surely writers, like everyone else, notionally go to heaven or wherever *after* they die.
Bring America Back !!!!
*Nice memoire, Mr Winship, of your Journalist American Idols.
*You should know that your predecessors are up there with
Walter Cronkite===not shaking their heads, nor gasping at
the modern day reality of the News==but relaxing each day
as they hear Cronkite's final report: ..."and that's the
way it is........good night."
This homage is harmless and well-intended, but it does seem a bit forced.
I agree with Mairead's guess that it may have been rushed, though of course that isn't necessarily so. I also agree that the "Looking Down from Heaven" cliché is a touch hacky.
Winship isn't successful in tying up the threads between craptacular reactionary wingnut bloviation and the passing of two writers with similar Crap Detectors, one a conflicted leftist and the other a humanist liberal.
As eulogies go, I'd give it a C, maybe C+.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Redemption. pffft
Don't make me laugh, Schulberg was unrepentent to the end and as far as I know made no effort to make amends with his victims.