Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Worse Than Obama's Kill List? American Support for It
- Scientists Confirm: Arctic Sea Ice 'Collapse' at Our Door
- Nearly 50 Climate Activists Arrested Outside Obama's White House
- Genetically Engineered Meat, Coming Soon to a Supermarket Near You
- DOJ Kill List Memo Forces Many Dems Out of the Closet as Overtly Unprincipled Hacks
Popular content
Today's Top News
G-20 Protesters Faced New Weapons
No longer the stuff of disturbing futuristic fantasies, an arsenal of "crowd control munitions," including one that reportedly made its debut in the U.S., was deployed with a massive, overpowering police presence in Pittsburgh during last week's G-20 protests.
Nearly 200 arrests were made and civil liberties groups charged the many thousands of police (most transported on Port Authority buses displaying "PITTSBURGH WELCOMES THE WORLD"), from as far away as Arizona and Florida with overreacting...and they had plenty of weaponry with which to do it.
Bean bags fired from shotguns, CS (tear) gas, OC (Oleoresin Capsicum) spray, flash-bang grenades, batons and, according to local news reports, for the first time on the streets of America, the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD).
Mounted in the turret of an Armored Personnel Carrier (APC), I saw the LRAD in action twice in the area of 25th, Penn and Liberty Streets of Lawrenceville, an old Pittsburgh neighborhood. Blasting a shrill, piercing noise like a high-pitched police siren on steroids, it quickly swept streets and sidewalks of pedestrians, merchants and journalists and drove residents into their homes, but in neither case were any demonstrators present.
The APC, oversized and sinister for a city street, together with lines of police in full riot gear looking like darkly threatening Michelin Men, made for a scene out of a movie you didn't want to be in.
As intimidating as this massive show of armed force and technology was, the good burghers of Pittsburgh and their fellow citizens in the Land of the Brave and Home of the Free ain't seen nothin' yet. Tear gas and pepper spray are nothing to sniff at and, indeed, have proven fatal a surprising number of times, but they have now become the old standbys compared to the list below that's already at or coming soon to a police station or National Guard headquarters near you.
Proving that "what goes around, comes around," some of the new Property Protection Devices were developed by a network of federally-funded, university-based research institutes like one in Pittsburgh itself, Penn State's Institute for Non-Lethal Defense Technologies.
--Raytheon Corp.'s Active Denial System, designed for crowd control in combat zones, uses an energy beam to induce an intolerable heating sensation, like a hot iron placed on the skin. It is effective beyond the range of small arms, in excess of 400 meters. Company officials have been advised they could expand the market by selling a smaller, tripod-mounted version for police forces.
--M5 Modular Crowd Control Munition, with a range of 30 meters "is similar in operation to a claymore mine, but it delivers...a strong, nonpenetrating blow to the body with multiple sub-munitions (600 rubber balls)."
--Long Range Acoustic Device or "The Scream," is a powerful megaphone the size of a satellite dish that can emit sound "50 times greater than the human threshold for pain" at close range, causing permanent hearing damage. The L.A. Times wrote U.S. Marines in Iraq used it in 2004.
It can deliver recorded warnings in Arabic and, on command, emit a piercing tone..."[For] most people, even if they plug their ears, [the device] will produce the equivalent of an instant migraine," says Woody Norris, chairman of American Technology Corp., the San Diego firm that produces the weapon. "It will knock [some people] on their knees."
CBS News reported in 2005 that the Israeli Army first used the device in the field to break up a protest against Israel's separation wall. "Protesters covered their ears and grabbed their heads, overcome by dizziness and nausea, after the vehicle-mounted device began sending out bursts of audible, but not loud, sound at intervals of about 10 seconds...A military official said the device emits a special frequency that targets the inner ear."
--In "Non-lethal Technologies: An Overview," Lewer and Davison describe a lengthy catalog of new weaponry including the "Directed Stick Radiator," a hand-held system based on the same technology as The Scream. "It fires high intensity ‘sonic bullets' or pulses of sound between 125-150db for a second or two. Such a weapon could, when fully developed, have the capacity to knock people off their feet."
--The Penn State facility is testing a "Distributed Sound and Light Array Debilitator" a.k.a. the "puke ray." The colors and rhythm of light are absorbed by the retina and disorient the brain, blinding the victim for several seconds. In conjunction with disturbing sounds it can make the person stumble or feel nauseated.
Foreign Policy in Focus reports that the Department of Homeland Security, with $1 million invested for testing the device, hopes to see it "in the hands of thousands of policemen, border agents and National Guardsmen" by 2010.
--Spider silk is cited in the University of Bradford's Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project, Report #4 (pg. 20) as an up-and-comer. "A research collaboration between the University of New Hampshire and the U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center is looking into the use of spider silk as a non-lethal ‘entanglement' material for disabling people.
They have developed a method for producing recombinant spider silk protein using E. coli and are trying to develop methods to produce large quantities of these fibres."
--New Scientist reports that the (I'm not making this up) Inertial Capacitive Incapacitator (ICI), developed by the Physical Optics Corporation of Torrance, California, uses a thin-film storage device charged during manufacture that only discharges when it strikes the target. It can be incorporated into a ring-shaped aerofoil and fired from a standard grenade launcher at low velocity, while still maintaining a flat trajectory for maximum accuracy.
--Aiming beyond Tasers, the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency, (FY 2009 budget: $1B) the domestic equivalent of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), plans to develop wireless weapons effective over greater distances, such as in an auditorium or sports stadium, or on a city street.
One such device, the Piezer, uses piezoelectric crystals that produce voltage when they are compressed. A 12-gauge shotgun fires the crystals, stunning the target with an electric shock on impact. Lynntech of College Station, Texas, is developing a projectile Taser that can be fired from a shotgun or 40-mm grenade launcher to increase greatly the weapon's current range of seven meters.
--"Off the Rocker and On the Floor: Continued Development of Biochemical Incapacitating Weapons," a report by the Bradford Disarmament Research Centre revealed that in 1992, the National Institute of Justice contracted with Lawrence Livermore National Lab to review clinical anesthetics for use by special ops military forces and police.
LLNL concluded the best option was an opioid, like fentanyl, effective at very low doses compared to morphine. Combined with a patch soaked in DMSO (dimethylsufoxide, a solvent) and fired from an air rifle, fentanyl could be delivered to the skin even through light clothing. Another recommended application for the drug was mixed with fine powder and dispersed as smoke.
--After upgrades, the infamous "Puff the Magic Dragon" gunship from the Vietnam War is now the AC-130. "Non-Lethal Weaponry: Applications to AC-130 Gunships," observes that "With the increasing involvement of US military in operations other than war..." the AC-130 "would provide commanders a full range of non-lethal weaponry from an airborne platform which was not previously available to them."
The paper concludes in part that "As the use of non-lethal weapons increases and it becomes valid and acceptable, more options will become available."
--Prozac and Zoloft are two of over 100 pharmaceuticals identified by the Penn State College of Medicine and the university's Applied Research Lab for further study as "non-lethal calmatives." These Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), noted the Penn State study, "...are found to be highly effective for numerous behavioral disturbances encountered in situations where a deployment of a non-lethal technique must be considered.
This class of pharmaceutical agents also continues to be under intense development by the pharmaceutical industry...New compounds under development (WO 09500194) are being designed with a faster onset of action. Drug development is continuing at a rapid rate in this area due to the large market for the treatment of depression (15 million individuals in North America)...It is likely that an SSRI agent can be identified in the near future that will feature a rapid rate of onset."
In Pittsburgh last week, an enormously expensive show of police and weaponry, intended for "security" of the G20 delegates, simultaneously shut workers out of downtown jobs for two days, forced gasping students and residents back into their dormitories and homes, and turned journalists' press passes into quaint, obsolete reminders of a bygone time.
Most significant of all, however, was what Witold Walczak, legal director of the Pennsylvania ACLU, told the Associated Press: "It's not just intimidation, it's disruption and in some cases outright prevention of peaceful protesters being able to get their message out."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

21 Comments so far
Show AllPeople of Chicago be forewarned. You may think the Olympics are a good thing for the city but think of the costs and the turmoil you'll be forced to endure.
Our police state nation will be itching to have some fun with us.
I know I wouldn't want it.
To borrow a line from "The Manchurian Candidate,"
We'll make Martial Law look like anarchy.
Progress is on the March! And, as these weapons are 'non-lethal', using them shouldn't be any problem to maintain today's idea of law and order.
The 1999 Seattle WTO protests gave police departments the justification they needed to declare a 'war on protest' and ever since have invoked the threat of anarchy to justify to the public their use of peaceful protesters as TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES in crowd control.
Don't ever think ANY police action at a protest is about protecting free speech, or about balancing the rights of protesters with public safety. Unless otherwise proven, assume police action is about TRAINING in paramilitary actions on peaceful protesters.
This completely unjustified adversarial attitude and the 'war on protesters' will never disappear, unless the leftist public starts joining the police force. These attitudes give the police another justification for playing soldier, and benefits university researchers, paramilitary supply companies, and politicians who can say they're supporting public safety.
I would add that to no small degree this attitude also causes police to believe that protesters per se are unpatriotic and anti-constitutional. Also, this will not go away until our people join the police.
That won't work. Take a look at this article:
Police reject candidate for being too intelligent
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_56314.html
hey, john mitchell...
followed your link...fits into the larger picture rather nicely, doesn't it?
with police like these, who needs terrorists?
Read the article, thanks, AND an academic article about it, where police managers generally agree that higher intelligence is one of the qualities they seek in new officers. Nevertheless, the New London police had claimed in rejecting the applicant with an IQ of 125, that brighter applicants leave police work more often for better jobs.
That's probably true, but not all do, or even the majority (according to the police managers' study), so the question should be whether the higher quality of policing is worth the increased turnover. NObody has studied that. Your statement that "that won't work" is considerably premature, as you're generalizing from one isolated case.
IMO, the New London police had a different motive in rejecting higher intelligence applicants, but I'll leave this discussion at that.
My opinion that your suggestion wouldn't work wasn't based solely on the one case I mentioned; it's based on my general impression of police forces and attitudes of American citizens. I respect your ideas and your goals, but I'm not as optimistic in this respect as you seem to be.
Police attitude pre-existed Seattle.
Change we can sieg-heil to.
If the teabaggers were faced with this threat to their free speech, they would of stayed home.
Do I get this right?
*All* of these got unleashed at once? Police used them broadly against non-protesters?
That takes on the character of an experiment.
Since they already know approximately what the biology and behavioral response of the direct victims is, they must be experimenting with public response.
Sounds like time to respond.
"With the increasing involvement of US military in operations other than war..."
does that sound right to you?
I caught that, too...I'm afraid my ever-increasing cycnicism let that slide by as 'yesterday's news', but you're right...the fact that the words have been plainly spelled out is worthy of note...
I would suggest the way to shut down the military is to shut down the taxation system, but, then, they have alternate sources of funding...
the world is a crime syndicate, and the militias are whoever pulls the trigger on whatever weapons systems they have, or contract...there is no national, patriotic aspect to it, as if there ever was...certainly no moral or ethical aspect...just business, and murder...'operations other than war' = murder...
"yesterday's news"
that would be the Posse Comitatus Act.
The paper on the possible use of non-lethal weapons on the AC-130 gunship includes some interesting items.
This one seems unusually honest for the U.S. government: "Non-combat operations include ... support of insurgency."
Regarding military operations other than war, the paper notes that:
"Military forces are not allowed to enforce the law except in two specific circumstances: to protect civilian property and functions after a sudden and unexpected civil disturbance, disaster, or calamity, or to protect federal property and functions. In both cases, specific authorization must be given, and the circumstances should be beyond the control of civilian law enforcement authorities. US military forces are not placed under the command of civilian law enforcement officers or nonfederalized National Guard; the federal military chain of command is maintained."
Not that I'm reassured by such statements.
Another disturbing thing was present on some of the videotape from the police attack at the University, namely an amplified voice warning the people present to disperse as the police had possession of and were planning to use weapons that would cause bodily injury. It is very creepy when you hear it.
I think people need to organize to specifically prevent any event that brings with it this kind of police presence - G20 meetings, political conventions, etc - from coming to their cities. If organizers believe that such events cannot be held without this type of security then, as someone said yesterday, these events should be moved onto military bases. The attack at the Pittsburgh University was an attack on the civilian population in general, as the vast majority of people present had nothing to do with the protests. The same thing happened in Seattle when the police attacked the Capital Hill District.
I want to repeat this link from another article, because I saw videos of the protests and I think Cindy Sheehan wrote a great open letter to the authorities, including email addresses for expressing your opinions to them at:
http://cindysheehanssoapbox.blogspot.com/
She also made the point that her son would likely not have died if his unit was as well equipped as the monstrosities used against our own people here at the G20. Truly sickening.
She is still doing a weekly broadcast that can be played free anytime from:
http://www.cindysheehanssoapbox.com/LISTEN.html
The elites sense that the sleeping giant is awakening.
How is it that the creeps who think up these torture devices and the goons who apply them are the ones with the authority? They should be the ones "in detention!" How far from a just and democratic society--which we have never had--have we come? Will this ever be reversible without the sacrifice of many many lives? What is happening?
"Will this ever be reversible without the sacrifice of many many lives?" –(Clovis)
–My feeling is that it won't be.
That window of opportunity is like an aperture that now lets in no light.
The line between police law enforcement and military operations may still be formally separated, but in practice that is no longer true.
A premonitory 'shot across the bow' announcing what is to come.
Pittsburgh is just another proving grounds– a seepage of the regnant darkness rendered visible into the obscuring light of day.
America defaults unassailably to fascism. The rest of the world knows that.
It is good to keep that squarely in mind. Not let the mind drift off the state terror, the torture, the Predator drone, the blood spoor that is America.
Maybe a rational politics will one day emerge by holding such truths self evident and building on it. Namely that fascism is not 'negotiable.'
It is dealt with not by accommodating it through the dilatory conventions of electoral democracy and liberal tolerance.
And fascism has little intention of negotiating with you. That's as clear as the first rain in Spring. Or Pittsburgh. –(Jill Bains)