Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Can Obama Help Forge A Global Consensus for Deep Economic Change?
Welcome World to Pittsburgh: Time For More Than Yak at the G20?
Dear International Leaders and Guests,
From The President's Welcome:
Michelle and I look forward to welcoming world leaders to the wonderful city of Pittsburgh on September 24th and 25th and we thank the people of Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania for opening their city as a showcase to the world.
The Pittsburgh Summit is an important opportunity to continue the hard work that we have done in confronting the global economic crisis, and renewing prosperity for our people. Together, we will review the progress we have made, assess what more needs to be done, and discuss what we can do together to lay the groundwork for balanced and sustainable economic growth. Pittsburgh stands as a bold example of how to create new jobs and industries while transitioning to a 21st century economy.
From The Dissector's Response:
Being a welcoming host may not be enough. The summit will be judged by what it does. So far, as the NY Times noted, Obama's style and desire to change the world's attitudes towards the US has not been matched by new policies.
Nevertheless, Pittsburgh was carefully chosen as a perfect backdrop for the ‘Every World Leader in Action' photo op. Did you know: It has 8 Fortune 500 Companies, and less unemployment than many others. Pittsburgh is also the 10th cleanest city according to Forbes. It is also supposedly the most livable, labeled "America's Most Livable City" by Places Rated Almanac and then in 2009, Pittsburgh named most livable city in the United States and 29th-most-livable city worldwide by The Economist.
Yet the G20 has not assembled to live there-but to talk, and hopefully reach agreements. We can only hope this conclave will be remembered for more than parties at the Andy Warhol museum.
Once America's steel Mecca known for its 446 bridges, it was an epicenter of industrial strife in the bad old days. Its lead companies, US Steel and Westinghouse are long gone. I remember documenting a factory closing in the once vital Mon Valley with all its manufacturing plants. How depressing!
(Aside: Speaking of PA. I was just honored to write an intro to a new edition of muckraker Ida M. Tarbell's classic and long out of print two volume History of the Standard Oil Company (Cosimo), one of journalism's greatest works, an expose of corporate exploitation of, in Billy Joel's words from his song Allentown, "the Pennsylvania I never found.")
One writer called the place then "hell with the lid off." The lid is back on even as the population shrunk down to 312,000. Clearly not everyone is enjoying its livability. It is now only the 61st most dangerous city in America with the Pittsburgh murder rate at 2.61 times the national average.
The town has its own dialect, "Pittsburghese;" locals who speak it are known as "Yinzers." The cool subculture revolves around an annual Zombie Fest.
Which is just perfect given all the Zombie banks that are still like dead men walking, with their trillions in toxic loans that seem to be impeding a full recovery. This is one of the reasons 20 nations - and many onlookers - are coming to town to pretend that a global consensus can be found to the world's economic problems.
Two issues on the world's agenda that go beyond what we have been pussyfooting around about: reining in the power of banks (including fraud, excessive compensation and bonuses), and rising protectionism that undermines international cooperation. President Obama's contribution to this problem was his slapping tariffs on Chinese made tire imports which has already led to retaliatory measures and threats of law suits. Not a great symbolic step for the host country!
(Of this decision, a betrayal of Washington's earlier promises to the G20, The Economist writes, "A protectionist move that is bad politics, bad economics, bad diplomacy and hurts America. Did we miss anything?")
The Campaign for America's Future asks us to look beneath the surface of Pitsburgh's economic "recovery":
Many high-paying jobs in manufacturing were replaced with low-paying jobs as waiters or hotel clerks. Many were never replaced at all.
-- America 's once-robust system of economic production -- the invention, design and manufacture of products -- has steadily eroded. In its place, an economy based on asset bubbles and foreign borrowing has developed. That strategy was never sustainable and is no longer available.
--Services alone are no path to prosperity. For the past 30 years, the U.S. has been replacing goods-producing jobs (down 54 percent) with service-providing jobs (up 34 percent). But service jobs don't pay as well. Even in the broad category of "services" -- which includes doctors, lawyers, and investment brokers -- service jobs pay 75 cents for every dollar paid a production job. Retail jobs pay 50 cents.
So it is to Pittsburgh that activists will also come, as they have and do to all these G20 Yak fests which make officials feel important and usually accomplish nothing much of significance.
After the G8 met in London where one protester was killed by police defending The City against The Rabble, a journalist noted:
G8 leaders were unable to come to any firm agreement on how to combat the financial crisis. Acknowledging the dangers posed by the crisis, the summit issued a statement that declared, 'The situation remains uncertain and significant risks remain to economic and financial stability...'
Good work guys (and gals.) How decisive! It was the US in the personage of Tim Geithner who actually blocked a more fundamental reform agenda proposed by the Germans and French.
Years earlier, I covered marches in Denver and then later with a diverse and righteous MAKE POVERTY HISTORY crowd in Glasgow at another one of these Gee Whiz affairs where much was postured to, and little was accomplished. You will note that protesters had to go to Court in Pittsburgh, in this era of Obama and in this land of the free, to even obtain permits to rally and protest. Many groups returned empty-handed.
But "they" will be out there with their signs, raucus music and bandanas, even if they get no coverage unless violence erupts-Remember Seattle-as they fight for a fairer world and efforts to stop climate change.
I am also sure no rightwing Teabaggers and 9-12ers will be out supporting this anti-government fight for economic justice which includes more money for AIDS, anti-poverty programs, financial reform, and jobs, jobs, jobs.
Officially, the G20 conclave is being positioned as another upbeat media event and exercise in perception management.
At the same time, we need to be reminded that while the G20 Meets in the City of the Three Rivers, it is a global moment, not just an American issue.
I was recently on the receiving end of an intemperate blast from a reader who did make a valid point that in all of this economic discourse, including some of my own work, we have to focus more attention on the people most in need worldwide who are hurt every day by Western economic policies.
How can we help the vast majority of humankind get visibility for their campaigns to be free from exploitative practices, curable diseases, and economic oppression?
How can we educate people in our own countries about the need to take part in this broader global effort and encourage our media to cover it more than they do?- Posted in


9 Comments so far
Show AllAdolph Reed’s 1996 assessment of Obama, shortly after the latter won his first Illinois state senate race:
“In Chicago, for instance, we’ve gotten a foretaste of the new breed of foundation-hatched black communitarian voices; one of them, a smooth Harvard lawyer with impeccable do-good credentials and vacuous-to-repressive neoliberal politics, has won a state senate seat on a base mainly in the liberal foundation and development worlds. His fundamentally bootstrap line was softened by a patina of the rhetoric of authentic community, talk about meeting in kitchens, small-scale solutions to social problems, and the predictable elevation of process over program -- the point where identity politics converges with old-fashioned middle-class reform in favoring form over substance. I suspect that his ilk is the wave of the future in U.S. black politics, as in Haiti and wherever else the International Monetary Fund has sway. So far the black activist response hasn’t been up to the challenge. We
have to do better.”
“The Curse of Community,” Village Voice, January 16, 1996—reprinted in Class Notes: Posing as Politics and Other Thoughts on the American Scene
(New Press, 2000)
Now of course we know as he says himself that Obama "loves the free market" so of course O-Man is on board with the capitalist neo-liberal robber barons so Danny's opening question is easily answered. The "deep economic change" that Danny may fantasize is somehow on the mind of Obama is not now nor has it ever been possible in the mindset of a guy who has completely accepted and internalized the ideologies of the ruling class.
“In Chicago, for instance, we’ve gotten a foretaste of the new breed of foundation-hatched black communitarian voices; one of them, a smooth Harvard lawyer with impeccable do-good credentials and vacuous-to-repressive neoliberal politics, has won a state senate seat on a base mainly in the liberal foundation and development worlds. His fundamentally bootstrap line was softened by a patina of the rhetoric of authentic community, talk about meeting in kitchens, small-scale solutions to social problems, and the predictable elevation of process over program -- the point where identity politics converges with old-fashioned middle-class reform in favoring form over substance. I suspect that his ilk is the wave of the future in U.S. black politics, as in Haiti and wherever else the International Monetary Fund has sway. So far the black activist response hasn’t been up to the challenge. We
have to do better.” -- Adoph Reed, 1996
mcoyote: THANKS for including this in your post. Mr. Reed nailed it, didn't he?
As I followed Obama's campaign, I began to note that I was finishing his sentences, word-for-word, before he could. Therefore, I began paying even closer attention. And, yes, there is a certain elegance to his rhetoric, but when I printed out his speeches, and read them, I found them to be lacking in substance.
Then, he cast his TELECOM vote, and Obama lost me for good!
I can't imagine that anything of any consequence -- economic policies, or otherwise -- will come out of the G20 conference in Pittsburgh. With Summers, Rubin and Geithner on hand, how can we even hope to believe in change?
Can Goldman Sachs Help Forge A Global Consensus for Deep Economic Change?
Danny, will you be the last to understand that the only change that will come from the top is oppressive change?
There are nefarious, secretive, greedy, plutocratic economic elites conniving in egregious plots to exploit and control the people. One cannot deny this. However, poverty is also caused by the overproduction of human beings. The enlightened masses apparently love to provide their owners with more cannon fodder, wage slaves, and debt peons ad disastrum.
I filed this under "Article Titles that Made Me LOL".
(The comments were nice, though.)
What a joke!
The only global economic change that would be appropriate is for the proletariat to rise up AROUND THE WORLD and obliterate the ruling class.
Nothing else will be effective. Nothing.
The G20 is nothing but a big shindig for the ruling class - eat rich food and great wine, exchange business cards, give each other insider trading tips, and plot how to further disenfranchise the working class.
Thanks to mcoyote for the Village Voice article. The key word may be "communitarian".
Danny m'boy, do you think a "broader global effort" is a substitute getting it fixed at home? Or that by thinking globally we can somehow resolve our national dilemma?
This is the communitarian way: to confuse the interests of the individual with the community. The betrayal of the American dream and its revolution is the betrayal of individual liberty with the notion that individuals exist to serve the community that results in subordination of individual liberty to an abstraction: the community.
The global economy is founded on the strength and viability of each national economy, just as the health and sustainability of any sustainable community is founded on the individuals that comprise it.
Fix our national economy so that it sustains and supports our American revolutionary goal of individual liberty, then we will be in a position to make a "broader global effort". Right now we're not in any position to help the world. We've got nothing to offer the world except a useless imperial military machine.